This document discusses and compares the ISA, EISA, and microchannel bus architectures used in PCs. It notes that while ISA became a de facto standard, it has limitations like a narrow 16-bit bus and slow 8-bit DMA chips. EISA was developed as an evolutionary upgrade to ISA to allow 32-bit components while maintaining compatibility. The microchannel introduced by IBM is a revolutionary redesign but is proprietary. EISA aims to integrate both 16-bit and 32-bit components but ends up similar to ISA for 16-bit devices. Overall microchannel has a simpler design while EISA maintains compatibility with existing ISA devices and standards at the cost of greater complexity.