Dr. S. Krishnan 
Associate Professor of Psychiatry 
Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram
 You are an outsider 
 You don’t have a right to intrude and peep 
 You are not a savior or judge 
 Don’t promise to solve all the family issues 
 Beware of transference issues 
 Family is different from HOME
An intervention which focuses 
on altering the interactions 
among family members and 
improve the functioning of the 
family as a unit of individual 
members of the family
 Numerous phenomena gave rise to family 
therapy and the systems perspective in the 
1940s & 1950s 
 Small group dynamics 
 Marriage Counseling 
 Research on schizophrenia 
 The Child Guidance Movement
Precipitating 
Maintaining Perpetuating
 Identify family’s 
unspoken rules 
 Disagreements about 
who makes these rules 
 Distorted ways of 
communications in the 
family 
 Rigid intergenerational 
patterns which cause 
distress within or 
between individuals
 Child psychiatric problems 
 Adolescent crises 
 Schizophrenia 
 Bipolar disorders 
 Dissociative disorders 
 Somatoform disorders 
 Dysthymia 
 Recurrent depressive disorders 
 And many more…
Understand 
the rules 
Modify the 
rules 
Improve 
communication
 5-10 sessions (Milan Approach) at intervals of 
1 month or more 
 2-3 sessions when the patient is in the 
hospital (preferably no more than one session 
per week) 
 Each session of 1-3 hours duration 
 Duration of therapy depends on the model 
used: 
 Problem solving models (short duration) 
 Growth oriented models ) (long durations - years)
1 
2 
5 3 
10
Improved communication 
Improved autonomy for each 
member 
Improved agreement about 
roles 
Reduced conflict 
Reduced distress in the index 
client
 All families face two 
types of stressors 
Developmental 
stressors 
Environmental 
stressors 
Families in distress 
are not sick, but have 
been unable to adjust 
to the stressors
 Marriage 
 1st child in family 
 1st teenager in 
family 
 Gender role 
changes 
 Death of a parent 
 Children leave 
home
 Fire 
 Injury 
 War 
 New job or job loss 
 Financial stressor 
 Rape
 Is often unwilling to take responsibility 
 Interprets problems from a linear causality 
perspective, rather than a circular perspective. 
 Suffers a confusion of levels (children and 
parents) 
 Forms coalitions (a parent and a child against 
another parent) 
 Appoints children to quasi-adult roles (a child 
taking on the role of one parent’s confidant)
 Stressors -- environmental and developmental -- 
arise in the normal course of a family’s life. 
 The failure of its members to cope with and 
accommodate to stressors leads members to 
disengage from some members, and become 
enmeshed with others 
 Indirectness of communication and anxiety ensues, 
with triangular relationships substituting for direct 
encounter and the pursuit of intimacy. 
 Identified client is usually reason for entering 
therapy, but often only the symptom of family 
distress..
 Concept by Murray Bowen 
 Two-person relationship is the basic unit of any 
emotional system. 
 Under stress the two-person system tends to 
draw in a third person to stabilize ( three-person 
system of two-against-one). 
 When anxiety builds up in any one triangle, it 
spills over into other triangles, filling the whole 
family system. 
  Problematic behavior patterns 
Monica McGoldrick, Genograms. W.W.Norton, 2007
 Families repeat themselves. 
 What happens in one generation will often 
repeat itself in the next, though the actual 
behavior may take a variety of forms. 
Monica McGoldrick, Genograms. W.W.Norton, 2007
 Families have rules 
that determine how 
balance is reinstated. 
If something violates 
the rules, then one of 
two things happen: 
 Members reassert the 
rules. 
 The family changes the 
rules.
 Families have values 
that assign meaning 
to various events. It 
is important to 
understand those 
values in working 
with families. 
 Values are a function 
of family and 
cultural origins.
 Families have ways of describing people and 
situations that reflect their values and rules. 
 It is important to understand the way the 
family uses language, in order to effectively 
reframe people and situations whenever a 
more positive viewpoint is possible. 
 Reframing is using language to describe a 
person or a situation in a more positive way.
 Psychodynamic-experiential models 
 Bowen model – family systems model 
 Structural model 
 General systems model
 Murray Bowen 
 The family is an emotional system 
composed of many generations, whether 
living or dead. 
 The goal of therapy is the differentiation of 
self from one’s family-of-origin. 
 Individuals who are not differentiated form 
unstable relationships and are prone to 
triangulation.
 The goal of therapy is differentiation. 
 Focus on family and relationship patterns 
rather than specific issues. 
 Look for signs of emotional cut-off and 
triangles. The stance of the therapist is that 
of observer. 
 Therapists must be highly differentiated to 
avoid the emotionality of the family system. 
 Genograms help clients map 
multigenerational processes.
 Salvador Minuchin 
 General systems approach to family therapy 
 Focused on the balance between stability & 
change, openness & closedness. 
 Its efficacy has been demonstrated with a 
wide variety of family configurations.
 Observations made of 
the communication 
styles in schizophrenic 
families. 
 Double bind 
 Marital schism 
 Marital skew 
 Pseudomutual and 
pseudohostile 
communication
 A view that when an individual receives an 
important message with two different 
meanings and is unable to respond to it, the 
individual is in an impossible situation. 
 If such messages are repeated over time, 
individuals may begin to show signs of 
schizophrenia.
 A situation in which one parent tries to 
undermine the worth of another (parent) by 
competing for sympathy or support from the 
children.
 A situation in which the psychological 
disturbance of one parent dominates the 
family’s interactions. 
 An unreal situation for family members is 
created so that the family can deal with one 
member’s disturbance.
 Presenting an appearance of open 
relationships in a family so as to conceal 
distant or troubled relationships within the 
family. 
 Members develop roles that they play rather 
than relating honestly.
 A system represents a set of units that stand 
in some consistent relationship to one 
another. 
 A system is organized around relationships. 
 Elements (units) interact with each other in a 
predictable, “organized” fashion. 
 Units, once combined form an entity - a 
whole, greater than the sum of its parts. 
 Therefore, no element can be understood in 
isolation.
 The organization of relationships may include 
groups, alliances, coalitions, and tensions. 
 The organization gives clues to the system’s 
consistent or repetitive interactive 
patterns…know as rules.
 Family rules: 
 Family interactions follow certain persistent 
patterns – rules (Jackson, 1965) 
 Redundancy principle – a family interacts in 
repetitive behavioral sequences. 
 Rules may be 
▪ Descriptive - metaphors describing patterns of 
interaction. 
▪ Prescriptive – directing what can or cannot occur 
between members.
 How changes in one 
family member can 
bring about changes 
in another, by looking 
at the entire family 
as a unit.
 Feedback: the reinsertion into a system of the 
results of its past performance, as a method of 
controlling the system. 
 Negative feedback: Information that flows 
back to a system to reduce behavior that 
causes disequilibrium. 
 Positive feedback: Information that leads to 
deviation from the system’s norm, bringing 
about change and a loss of stability.
 Equifinality: the ability of a system to arrive at 
the same destination from different paths. 
 Homeostasis: A dynamic state of balance or 
equilibrium in a system, or a tendency toward 
achieving and maintaining such a state in an 
effort to ensure a stable environment.
 Assessment of the family structure 
 Summarizing family structure – GENOGRAM 
(Murray Bowen) 
 Current and past state of family life 
 Roles of the members 
 Therapist tries to answer two questions: 
 How the family functions 
 Whether family factors are involved in client’s 
problems
 1) Inviting entire family to session 
 2) Joining and building a collaborative 
relationship 
 3) Assessing problem from multiple 
perspectives 
 4) Assessing family rules, values, language 
patterns, and goals (teleological lens) 
 5) Assessing cultural issues (multicultural lens), 
and family of origin for patterns across the 
generations (developmental lens)  genogram
 6) Observing, or tracking interactional patterns -- 
asking process questions (Bowen) 
 educates the family about circular causality 
 I-position encourages taking responsibility and 
ending of blame 
 7) Observing and encouraging typical dynamics -- 
enactments (Minuchin). Therapist may use 
 Reframing, poking, “stroke and a kick” 
 Assigning tasks 
▪ boundary adjustments 
▪ eliciting and supporting competencies
One person is asked to 
comment on the 
relationships of 
others. 
Others are asked to 
comment on her 
response 
Purpose is to discover 
and clarify confusing 
and conflicting views
 Designed to provoke the family into making 
changes which they cannot make in other 
ways 
 Paradoxical injunctions are impossible or 
counter intuitive suggestions which force 
the family to confront their hidden or 
unacceptable motives
 Structure (genogram) (single parent, step 
parent, size and age of spread of he sibship) 
 Relationships (close, distant, uncooperative, 
conflictual) 
 Patterns of interactions (child siding with one 
parent against the other) 
 Changes and events (births, deaths, 
departures, financial problems
 Contribute to patient’s problems (son does 
not want to leave widowed mother after 
marriage) 
 Supporting the client (codependence) 
 Reacting to the client’s problems (unrelated 
other problems may be there)
 Denial 
 Distortions 
 Arbitrary inferences 
 Selective abstraction 
 Overgeneralization 
 Minimization 
 Maximization 
 Dichotomous thinking 
 Personalization…
 Supporting parents (hierarchies) 
 Insulating parents from their own families of 
origins 
 Insulating parents from children 
 Establishing direct communication or “De-triangulating” 
 Nurturing competencies through reframing 
symptoms as strengths and assigning tasks 
 Redefining relationships one-to-one with 
family of origin
Critical/Enmeshed Parent / In-Law 
Acting out Teenager 
Affairs
 Unwillingness of adult child to assert boundaries 
 Unwillingness of son/daughter in-law to confront 
parent directly 
 Can lead to carryover of anger of adult child to 
spouse 
Establish better boundaries and privacy between 
couple and parent 
Confront in-law by adult child 
Establish direct relationship between son/daughter 
in-law and parent in-law (de-triangulation)
 Usually one parent is disengaged from the 
family 
 The other parent is usually over-involved in the 
“problem” child’s life. 
 There is a lack of intimacy between couple due 
to preoccupation with child. 
 There is often a neglect of other children’s 
needs
 Get couple to work together to resolve 
differences, clarify rules, and express 
expectations 
 Reframe teenager’s behavior if possible 
 Encourage direct communication between 
teenager and disengaged parent(s) without 
interference
 Usually occurs during major developmental or 
environmental stressors, which disrupt 
communication and intimacy between spouses 
 Can be due to lifelong suppression of one’s needs in 
the context of a marital relationship 
 Can be due to lack of intimacy due to family 
pressures
 Establish that it takes two for an affair to happen. 
 Need to communicate unspoken needs 
 perhaps too much difference or 
“complementarity” 
 perhaps not enough “similarity,” and quality time 
 explore unexpressed dreams
 Focus on process (how) rather than content 
(what) 
 Focus on interpersonal dynamics, rather than 
personal feelings and thoughts 
 Focus on here and now, vs. there and then
 Teach Circular Causality/Reciprocity 
 Ask “process questions” that encourage 
linking one’s own behavior to the effects on 
others, example: “What effect does it have on 
her when you withdraw and watch TV?” or 
“Have you tried to talk with him about it rather 
than giving him the silent treatment?” 
 Encouraging I-position, not talking about 
others 
 Explore cross-generational patterns
 De-triangulating 
▪ Getting people to talk directly without 
interruptions 
▪ Role playing direct communication 
▪ Having everyone present for meeting 
 Acknowledging competencies and putting them 
to work 
 Reframing -- “Stroke and Kick” -- Reframe and 
redirect 
 Genograms for cross-generational patterns
 When FMs can complete transactions 
 When FMs can interpret hostility 
 When FMs can see how others see them 
 When FMs can see how they see themselves 
 When one member can tell others what is 
hoped, feared and expected from them or how 
they manifest themselves 
 When FMs can disagree 
 When FMs can make choices 
 When FMs can learn through practice 
 When FMs can free themselves from harmful 
effects of past models 
 When FMs can give clear message
Family group therapy 
Social network therapy 
Paradoxical therapy
Dr. krishnan's family therapy

Dr. krishnan's family therapy

  • 1.
    Dr. S. Krishnan Associate Professor of Psychiatry Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram
  • 2.
     You arean outsider  You don’t have a right to intrude and peep  You are not a savior or judge  Don’t promise to solve all the family issues  Beware of transference issues  Family is different from HOME
  • 3.
    An intervention whichfocuses on altering the interactions among family members and improve the functioning of the family as a unit of individual members of the family
  • 4.
     Numerous phenomenagave rise to family therapy and the systems perspective in the 1940s & 1950s  Small group dynamics  Marriage Counseling  Research on schizophrenia  The Child Guidance Movement
  • 6.
  • 7.
     Identify family’s unspoken rules  Disagreements about who makes these rules  Distorted ways of communications in the family  Rigid intergenerational patterns which cause distress within or between individuals
  • 8.
     Child psychiatricproblems  Adolescent crises  Schizophrenia  Bipolar disorders  Dissociative disorders  Somatoform disorders  Dysthymia  Recurrent depressive disorders  And many more…
  • 9.
    Understand the rules Modify the rules Improve communication
  • 10.
     5-10 sessions(Milan Approach) at intervals of 1 month or more  2-3 sessions when the patient is in the hospital (preferably no more than one session per week)  Each session of 1-3 hours duration  Duration of therapy depends on the model used:  Problem solving models (short duration)  Growth oriented models ) (long durations - years)
  • 12.
    1 2 53 10
  • 13.
    Improved communication Improvedautonomy for each member Improved agreement about roles Reduced conflict Reduced distress in the index client
  • 15.
     All familiesface two types of stressors Developmental stressors Environmental stressors Families in distress are not sick, but have been unable to adjust to the stressors
  • 16.
     Marriage 1st child in family  1st teenager in family  Gender role changes  Death of a parent  Children leave home
  • 17.
     Fire Injury  War  New job or job loss  Financial stressor  Rape
  • 18.
     Is oftenunwilling to take responsibility  Interprets problems from a linear causality perspective, rather than a circular perspective.  Suffers a confusion of levels (children and parents)  Forms coalitions (a parent and a child against another parent)  Appoints children to quasi-adult roles (a child taking on the role of one parent’s confidant)
  • 19.
     Stressors --environmental and developmental -- arise in the normal course of a family’s life.  The failure of its members to cope with and accommodate to stressors leads members to disengage from some members, and become enmeshed with others  Indirectness of communication and anxiety ensues, with triangular relationships substituting for direct encounter and the pursuit of intimacy.  Identified client is usually reason for entering therapy, but often only the symptom of family distress..
  • 20.
     Concept byMurray Bowen  Two-person relationship is the basic unit of any emotional system.  Under stress the two-person system tends to draw in a third person to stabilize ( three-person system of two-against-one).  When anxiety builds up in any one triangle, it spills over into other triangles, filling the whole family system.   Problematic behavior patterns Monica McGoldrick, Genograms. W.W.Norton, 2007
  • 21.
     Families repeatthemselves.  What happens in one generation will often repeat itself in the next, though the actual behavior may take a variety of forms. Monica McGoldrick, Genograms. W.W.Norton, 2007
  • 22.
     Families haverules that determine how balance is reinstated. If something violates the rules, then one of two things happen:  Members reassert the rules.  The family changes the rules.
  • 23.
     Families havevalues that assign meaning to various events. It is important to understand those values in working with families.  Values are a function of family and cultural origins.
  • 24.
     Families haveways of describing people and situations that reflect their values and rules.  It is important to understand the way the family uses language, in order to effectively reframe people and situations whenever a more positive viewpoint is possible.  Reframing is using language to describe a person or a situation in a more positive way.
  • 25.
     Psychodynamic-experiential models  Bowen model – family systems model  Structural model  General systems model
  • 26.
     Murray Bowen  The family is an emotional system composed of many generations, whether living or dead.  The goal of therapy is the differentiation of self from one’s family-of-origin.  Individuals who are not differentiated form unstable relationships and are prone to triangulation.
  • 27.
     The goalof therapy is differentiation.  Focus on family and relationship patterns rather than specific issues.  Look for signs of emotional cut-off and triangles. The stance of the therapist is that of observer.  Therapists must be highly differentiated to avoid the emotionality of the family system.  Genograms help clients map multigenerational processes.
  • 28.
     Salvador Minuchin  General systems approach to family therapy  Focused on the balance between stability & change, openness & closedness.  Its efficacy has been demonstrated with a wide variety of family configurations.
  • 29.
     Observations madeof the communication styles in schizophrenic families.  Double bind  Marital schism  Marital skew  Pseudomutual and pseudohostile communication
  • 30.
     A viewthat when an individual receives an important message with two different meanings and is unable to respond to it, the individual is in an impossible situation.  If such messages are repeated over time, individuals may begin to show signs of schizophrenia.
  • 31.
     A situationin which one parent tries to undermine the worth of another (parent) by competing for sympathy or support from the children.
  • 32.
     A situationin which the psychological disturbance of one parent dominates the family’s interactions.  An unreal situation for family members is created so that the family can deal with one member’s disturbance.
  • 33.
     Presenting anappearance of open relationships in a family so as to conceal distant or troubled relationships within the family.  Members develop roles that they play rather than relating honestly.
  • 34.
     A systemrepresents a set of units that stand in some consistent relationship to one another.  A system is organized around relationships.  Elements (units) interact with each other in a predictable, “organized” fashion.  Units, once combined form an entity - a whole, greater than the sum of its parts.  Therefore, no element can be understood in isolation.
  • 35.
     The organizationof relationships may include groups, alliances, coalitions, and tensions.  The organization gives clues to the system’s consistent or repetitive interactive patterns…know as rules.
  • 36.
     Family rules:  Family interactions follow certain persistent patterns – rules (Jackson, 1965)  Redundancy principle – a family interacts in repetitive behavioral sequences.  Rules may be ▪ Descriptive - metaphors describing patterns of interaction. ▪ Prescriptive – directing what can or cannot occur between members.
  • 37.
     How changesin one family member can bring about changes in another, by looking at the entire family as a unit.
  • 38.
     Feedback: thereinsertion into a system of the results of its past performance, as a method of controlling the system.  Negative feedback: Information that flows back to a system to reduce behavior that causes disequilibrium.  Positive feedback: Information that leads to deviation from the system’s norm, bringing about change and a loss of stability.
  • 39.
     Equifinality: theability of a system to arrive at the same destination from different paths.  Homeostasis: A dynamic state of balance or equilibrium in a system, or a tendency toward achieving and maintaining such a state in an effort to ensure a stable environment.
  • 41.
     Assessment ofthe family structure  Summarizing family structure – GENOGRAM (Murray Bowen)  Current and past state of family life  Roles of the members  Therapist tries to answer two questions:  How the family functions  Whether family factors are involved in client’s problems
  • 42.
     1) Invitingentire family to session  2) Joining and building a collaborative relationship  3) Assessing problem from multiple perspectives  4) Assessing family rules, values, language patterns, and goals (teleological lens)  5) Assessing cultural issues (multicultural lens), and family of origin for patterns across the generations (developmental lens)  genogram
  • 43.
     6) Observing,or tracking interactional patterns -- asking process questions (Bowen)  educates the family about circular causality  I-position encourages taking responsibility and ending of blame  7) Observing and encouraging typical dynamics -- enactments (Minuchin). Therapist may use  Reframing, poking, “stroke and a kick”  Assigning tasks ▪ boundary adjustments ▪ eliciting and supporting competencies
  • 44.
    One person isasked to comment on the relationships of others. Others are asked to comment on her response Purpose is to discover and clarify confusing and conflicting views
  • 45.
     Designed toprovoke the family into making changes which they cannot make in other ways  Paradoxical injunctions are impossible or counter intuitive suggestions which force the family to confront their hidden or unacceptable motives
  • 46.
     Structure (genogram)(single parent, step parent, size and age of spread of he sibship)  Relationships (close, distant, uncooperative, conflictual)  Patterns of interactions (child siding with one parent against the other)  Changes and events (births, deaths, departures, financial problems
  • 52.
     Contribute topatient’s problems (son does not want to leave widowed mother after marriage)  Supporting the client (codependence)  Reacting to the client’s problems (unrelated other problems may be there)
  • 53.
     Denial Distortions  Arbitrary inferences  Selective abstraction  Overgeneralization  Minimization  Maximization  Dichotomous thinking  Personalization…
  • 54.
     Supporting parents(hierarchies)  Insulating parents from their own families of origins  Insulating parents from children  Establishing direct communication or “De-triangulating”  Nurturing competencies through reframing symptoms as strengths and assigning tasks  Redefining relationships one-to-one with family of origin
  • 55.
    Critical/Enmeshed Parent /In-Law Acting out Teenager Affairs
  • 56.
     Unwillingness ofadult child to assert boundaries  Unwillingness of son/daughter in-law to confront parent directly  Can lead to carryover of anger of adult child to spouse Establish better boundaries and privacy between couple and parent Confront in-law by adult child Establish direct relationship between son/daughter in-law and parent in-law (de-triangulation)
  • 57.
     Usually oneparent is disengaged from the family  The other parent is usually over-involved in the “problem” child’s life.  There is a lack of intimacy between couple due to preoccupation with child.  There is often a neglect of other children’s needs
  • 58.
     Get coupleto work together to resolve differences, clarify rules, and express expectations  Reframe teenager’s behavior if possible  Encourage direct communication between teenager and disengaged parent(s) without interference
  • 59.
     Usually occursduring major developmental or environmental stressors, which disrupt communication and intimacy between spouses  Can be due to lifelong suppression of one’s needs in the context of a marital relationship  Can be due to lack of intimacy due to family pressures
  • 60.
     Establish thatit takes two for an affair to happen.  Need to communicate unspoken needs  perhaps too much difference or “complementarity”  perhaps not enough “similarity,” and quality time  explore unexpressed dreams
  • 61.
     Focus onprocess (how) rather than content (what)  Focus on interpersonal dynamics, rather than personal feelings and thoughts  Focus on here and now, vs. there and then
  • 62.
     Teach CircularCausality/Reciprocity  Ask “process questions” that encourage linking one’s own behavior to the effects on others, example: “What effect does it have on her when you withdraw and watch TV?” or “Have you tried to talk with him about it rather than giving him the silent treatment?”  Encouraging I-position, not talking about others  Explore cross-generational patterns
  • 63.
     De-triangulating ▪Getting people to talk directly without interruptions ▪ Role playing direct communication ▪ Having everyone present for meeting  Acknowledging competencies and putting them to work  Reframing -- “Stroke and Kick” -- Reframe and redirect  Genograms for cross-generational patterns
  • 65.
     When FMscan complete transactions  When FMs can interpret hostility  When FMs can see how others see them  When FMs can see how they see themselves  When one member can tell others what is hoped, feared and expected from them or how they manifest themselves  When FMs can disagree  When FMs can make choices  When FMs can learn through practice  When FMs can free themselves from harmful effects of past models  When FMs can give clear message
  • 66.
    Family group therapy Social network therapy Paradoxical therapy