Prof Yasser M. Abdelhamid MD
Professor of Nephrology
Cairo University
• A) Initiation
• C) Dosing
• D) Termination
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• Modality: The main mechanism with which
clearance is achieved.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Ideal Treatment Modality
• Preserves homeostasis
• Does not increase co-morbidity
• Does not worsen patient’s underlying
condition
• Inexpensive
• Simple to manage
• Not burdensome to the ICU staff
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• 80% of patients with AKI in the ICU were
treated with continuous therapies,
• 17% with intermittent Therapies
• 3% with peritoneal dialysis or slow continuous
ultrafiltration
(Uchino et al, Intensive Care Med, 2007)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Modalities
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
IHD
PD
PIRT
EDD
SLEDD
SLEDD-f
CRRT
• Convection is used for higher than 1000 kDa
up to several thousand kDa
Principles
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Membrane Characteristics (SC)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid Neri et al, Critical Care , 2016
• Adsorption:
Principles
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Modality Choice
o IHD # CRRT
o SLEDD # CRRT
o IHD # PD
o SLEDD # PD
o CRRT # PD
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Modality Choice
o IHD # CRRT
o SLEDD # CRRT
o IHD # PD
o SLEDD # PD
o CRRT # PD
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
CRRT: Advantages
 Hemodynamic Stability
 Recovery of Renal Functions
 Correction of Metabolic Acidosis
 Biocompatibility
 Correction of Malnutrition
 Removal of Cytokines
 Solute Removal
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Disadvantages
• Continuous??!!!
• Anticoagulation
• Bed rest
• Higher cost
• Lower efficiency than IHD
• Risk of hypothermia
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• Gradual removal of solutes and metabolic
waste helps to clear inflammatory mediators
and ensure adequate nutrition for patients
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Intermittent Hemodialysis
 Short duration
 less anticoagulation
 Higher efficiency
 Less bed rest
 Flexible
 Bags cost saving
 Dialysate
 Infrastructure
 Rebound
 Hemodynamic
instability
 Residual renal
functions
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
CRRT ……Gradual
Deepa and Muralidhar, J Anaesthiology clin Pharmcol,2012,386-396Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Why
• Maintenance of intravascular compartment volume
• Prolonged treatments permit lower fluid removal rates
– IHD: 3 L in 3 hours = 1 L/h UF rate
– CRRT: 3 L in 24 hrs = 0.125 ml/h UF rate
• Urea diffusion is faster with IHD than CRRT
– IHD: Urea clearance ~160 ml/min
– CRRT: Urea clearance ~15-30 ml/min
• Convective sodium removal rate
[hemofiltration/hemodiafiltration] is less than diffusive
removal rate [hemodialysis]
• Decreased core temperature.
• Convective removal of inflammatory mediators could
contribute to hemodynamic stability.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• Cardiac failure.
• Large amount of IV intake.
• Hyperthermia (core temperature >39.5°C) or
hypothermia (core temperature <37°C)
• Overdose with a dialyzable toxin (e.g. Lithium)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Non Renal Indications (ICU)
• Combined acute renal and hepatic failure
• Acute brain injury: Decreases cerebral edema
– Autoregulation is lost!
– Sudden changes in systemic or intra-abdominal
pressure change intracranial pressure
– Slow correction of azotemia
• Na disorders
• Abdominal compartment syndrome
Non Renal Indications
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Special Circumstances
• Acute fulminant liver failure:
– Brain edema.
– Hyponatremia is common, causes brain edema
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
CRRT Modalities
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
(Cerda´ and Ronco, Seminars in Dialysis, 2009)
• Many intensivists and nephrologists prefer to
use CVVH in the belief that pure convection
will remove a greater number of larger
molecules than diffusion-base CVVHD.
• CVVHDF in a safe combination
(Ricci et al, Crit Care, 2006)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• Initially, high volume hemofiltration offered
benefit over conventional hemodialysis.
• Meta-analysis (IVOIRE) suggested no
benefit (Borthwick et al, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013, Joannes-Boyau et
al Intensive Care Med. 2013)
• High dose 80ml/kg/h was found to decrease level
of IL 1B, 6, 8 and 10 with no effect on mortality
than conventional dos of 40ml/kg/h
(Park et al, Am J Kidney Dis, 2016)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
CRRT and Sepsis
Modality Choice
o IHD # CRRT
o SLEDD # CRRT
o IHD # PD
o SLEDD # PD
o CRRT # PD
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
 Slower (QD,QB).
 Prolonged >5 h.
 Hemodynamic tolerance.
• 6–12 hours over night treatment.
• Patient mobility
 Anticoagulation.
 Superior clearance than CRRT,
 Removal of toxins (higher flows)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Advantages
Disadvantages
• Same as IHD
• Hypophosphatemia.
• Hypothermia.
• Low efficiency.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Hybrid Methods
• Operational characteristics
• Fluid removal: ultrafiltration volumes vary
between zero and 6 L /d
• Electrolyte control and nutritional
considerations: maintained within normal limits.
• Protein should be augmented by 0.2 gm/kg per
day during hybrid treatment.
• Drug clearance: intermediate between that of
IHD and CRRT.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Ultrapure Water
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Hybrid Methods (PIRTT)
Reported experiences suggest patients
outcomes are similar to those reported with
other acute therapies.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Outcome
s
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• Conclusion:
• SLEDD is a viable modality of renal
replacement therapy in patients with septic
shock as the hemodynamic effects are similar
to CRRT.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Sepsis associated AKI
Use of Norepinephrin
194 pt , 531 sessions
No difference in mortality
or renal recovery
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Modality Choice
o IHD # CRRT
o SLEDD # CRRT
o IHD # PD
o SLEDD # PD
o CRRT # PD
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Advantages
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Limitations
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study of Tidal Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Continuous R
Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study of Tidal Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, Volume: 22, Issue:
4, Pages: 371-379, First published: 25 March 2018, DOI: (10.1111/1744-9987.12660)
Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study of Tidal Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, Volume: 22, Issue:
4, Pages: 371-379, First published: 25 March 2018, DOI: (10.1111/1744-9987.12660)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• Comparison of
metabolic and fluid
control in daily
extended hemodialysis
(EHD) and high volume
peritoneal dialysis
(Researchgate)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
BUN
Creat
Bicab
K
UF Kt/V
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• CONCLUSIONS:
• Based on moderate (mortality, recovery of kidney
function), low (infectious complications), or very
low certainty evidence (correction of acidosis)
there is probably little or no difference between
PD and extracorporeal therapy for treating AKI.
Fluid removal (low certainty) and weekly
delivered Kt/V (very low certainty) may be higher
with extracorporeal therapy.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• Hemodynamic stability of the critically ill
patient is the main determinant of the choice
of dialysis modality
(Palevsky et al, N Engl J Med, 2008)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Criteria of Different Therapies
(Cerda´ and Ronco, Seminars in Dialysis, 2009)Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Modalities and Clinical Outcome
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Fluid Overload
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Figure 1
Kidney International 2009 76, 422-427DOI: (10.1038/ki.2009.159)
Copyright © 2009 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Figure 2
Kidney International 2009 76, 422-427DOI: (10.1038/ki.2009.159)
Copyright © 2009 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Figure 3
Kidney International 2009 76, 422-427DOI: (10.1038/ki.2009.159)
Copyright © 2009 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Figure 4
Kidney International 2009 76, 422-427DOI: (10.1038/ki.2009.159)
Copyright © 2009 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Renal Recovery
• Forty-nine studies were included
• Conclusion: Findings of the conducted
assessment show that initial CRRT is
associated with higher rates of renal recovery.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
RRT and Recovery
• Decision to initiation:
• No clear effect on short and long term
recovery
• (Clec’h C, et al, Crit Care, 2011)
• (Elseviers et al, Crit Care, 2010)
• (Bagshaw et al, J Crit Care, 2013) BEST
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Initial therapy, at least with CRRT, may confer
a higher likelihood of recovery to dialysis
independence
(Wald et al, Crit Care Med. 2014)
(Glassford et al, Curr OpinCrit Care 2011)
(Schneider et al, Intensive Care Med 2013)
 RENAL and ATN (the reverse)
RRT and Recovery
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Impact on Modality on Recovery
(Schneider and Bagshaw, Nephron Clin Pract 2014)Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Definition
of
Recovery
Do You Trust?
• IRRT: Lower illness severity
• IRRT: Greater hemodynamic stability
• Impact of original disease.
• Other treatments.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
End Point of Recovery
• 30 d survival
• 90 d survival
• ICU stay
• RRT dependence
• 6m, 12 m survival
• RIFLE improvement
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• Retrospective cohort
• 2000 to 2008 who received RRT for AKI and
survived to hospital discharge or 90 days
• 4738 pt AKI KDIGO 3
• 638 (47.7%) survived to hospital discharge
• Renal recovery (alive and not requiring RRT
• 90 and 365 days.
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• No significant difference in hazards for non-
recovery or reasons for non-recovery
(mortality or ESRD) with intermittent
hemodialysis versus continuous RRT
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Truche et al, Intensive Care Med (2016)
• CRRT did not appear to improve 30-day and 6-
month patient outcomes. It seems beneficial
for patients with fluid overload, but might be
deleterious in the absence of hemodynamic
failure. (Truche et al ,Intensive Care Medicine, 2016)
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
 Conclusion
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
• Hemodynamic stability is the main determinant
of modality choice.
• Clearance is better achieved by combination of
diffusion and convection.
• Specific indications for CRRT.
• Volume overload and renal recovery.
• CRRT and recovery ???
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Egyptian Nephrology Guidelines ( Part 1 )
Dialysis in AKI
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
Yasser Abdelhamid

Dialysis in aki

  • 1.
    Prof Yasser M.Abdelhamid MD Professor of Nephrology Cairo University
  • 2.
    • A) Initiation •C) Dosing • D) Termination Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 3.
    • Modality: Themain mechanism with which clearance is achieved. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 4.
    Ideal Treatment Modality •Preserves homeostasis • Does not increase co-morbidity • Does not worsen patient’s underlying condition • Inexpensive • Simple to manage • Not burdensome to the ICU staff Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 5.
    • 80% ofpatients with AKI in the ICU were treated with continuous therapies, • 17% with intermittent Therapies • 3% with peritoneal dialysis or slow continuous ultrafiltration (Uchino et al, Intensive Care Med, 2007) Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 6.
  • 7.
    • Convection isused for higher than 1000 kDa up to several thousand kDa Principles Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 8.
    Membrane Characteristics (SC) Prof.Yasser Abdelhamid Neri et al, Critical Care , 2016
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Modality Choice o IHD# CRRT o SLEDD # CRRT o IHD # PD o SLEDD # PD o CRRT # PD Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 11.
    Modality Choice o IHD# CRRT o SLEDD # CRRT o IHD # PD o SLEDD # PD o CRRT # PD Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 12.
    CRRT: Advantages  HemodynamicStability  Recovery of Renal Functions  Correction of Metabolic Acidosis  Biocompatibility  Correction of Malnutrition  Removal of Cytokines  Solute Removal Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 13.
    Disadvantages • Continuous??!!! • Anticoagulation •Bed rest • Higher cost • Lower efficiency than IHD • Risk of hypothermia Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 14.
    • Gradual removalof solutes and metabolic waste helps to clear inflammatory mediators and ensure adequate nutrition for patients Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 15.
    Intermittent Hemodialysis  Shortduration  less anticoagulation  Higher efficiency  Less bed rest  Flexible  Bags cost saving  Dialysate  Infrastructure  Rebound  Hemodynamic instability  Residual renal functions Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 16.
    CRRT ……Gradual Deepa andMuralidhar, J Anaesthiology clin Pharmcol,2012,386-396Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Why • Maintenance ofintravascular compartment volume • Prolonged treatments permit lower fluid removal rates – IHD: 3 L in 3 hours = 1 L/h UF rate – CRRT: 3 L in 24 hrs = 0.125 ml/h UF rate • Urea diffusion is faster with IHD than CRRT – IHD: Urea clearance ~160 ml/min – CRRT: Urea clearance ~15-30 ml/min • Convective sodium removal rate [hemofiltration/hemodiafiltration] is less than diffusive removal rate [hemodialysis] • Decreased core temperature. • Convective removal of inflammatory mediators could contribute to hemodynamic stability. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 19.
    • Cardiac failure. •Large amount of IV intake. • Hyperthermia (core temperature >39.5°C) or hypothermia (core temperature <37°C) • Overdose with a dialyzable toxin (e.g. Lithium) Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid Non Renal Indications (ICU)
  • 20.
    • Combined acuterenal and hepatic failure • Acute brain injury: Decreases cerebral edema – Autoregulation is lost! – Sudden changes in systemic or intra-abdominal pressure change intracranial pressure – Slow correction of azotemia • Na disorders • Abdominal compartment syndrome Non Renal Indications Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 21.
    Special Circumstances • Acutefulminant liver failure: – Brain edema. – Hyponatremia is common, causes brain edema Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 22.
    CRRT Modalities Prof. YasserAbdelhamid (Cerda´ and Ronco, Seminars in Dialysis, 2009)
  • 23.
    • Many intensivistsand nephrologists prefer to use CVVH in the belief that pure convection will remove a greater number of larger molecules than diffusion-base CVVHD. • CVVHDF in a safe combination (Ricci et al, Crit Care, 2006) Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 24.
    • Initially, highvolume hemofiltration offered benefit over conventional hemodialysis. • Meta-analysis (IVOIRE) suggested no benefit (Borthwick et al, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013, Joannes-Boyau et al Intensive Care Med. 2013) • High dose 80ml/kg/h was found to decrease level of IL 1B, 6, 8 and 10 with no effect on mortality than conventional dos of 40ml/kg/h (Park et al, Am J Kidney Dis, 2016) Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid CRRT and Sepsis
  • 25.
    Modality Choice o IHD# CRRT o SLEDD # CRRT o IHD # PD o SLEDD # PD o CRRT # PD Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 26.
     Slower (QD,QB). Prolonged >5 h.  Hemodynamic tolerance. • 6–12 hours over night treatment. • Patient mobility  Anticoagulation.  Superior clearance than CRRT,  Removal of toxins (higher flows) Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid Advantages
  • 27.
    Disadvantages • Same asIHD • Hypophosphatemia. • Hypothermia. • Low efficiency. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 28.
    Hybrid Methods • Operationalcharacteristics • Fluid removal: ultrafiltration volumes vary between zero and 6 L /d • Electrolyte control and nutritional considerations: maintained within normal limits. • Protein should be augmented by 0.2 gm/kg per day during hybrid treatment. • Drug clearance: intermediate between that of IHD and CRRT. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 29.
  • 30.
    Hybrid Methods (PIRTT) Reportedexperiences suggest patients outcomes are similar to those reported with other acute therapies. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid Outcome s
  • 31.
  • 32.
    • Conclusion: • SLEDDis a viable modality of renal replacement therapy in patients with septic shock as the hemodynamic effects are similar to CRRT. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 33.
    Sepsis associated AKI Useof Norepinephrin 194 pt , 531 sessions No difference in mortality or renal recovery Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 34.
    Modality Choice o IHD# CRRT o SLEDD # CRRT o IHD # PD o SLEDD # PD o CRRT # PD Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
    Acute Kidney Injuryin Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study of Tidal Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Continuous R Replacement Therapy Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study of Tidal Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, Volume: 22, Issue: 4, Pages: 371-379, First published: 25 March 2018, DOI: (10.1111/1744-9987.12660)
  • 39.
    Acute Kidney Injuryin Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study of Tidal Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, Volume: 22, Issue: 4, Pages: 371-379, First published: 25 March 2018, DOI: (10.1111/1744-9987.12660)
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
    • Comparison of metabolicand fluid control in daily extended hemodialysis (EHD) and high volume peritoneal dialysis (Researchgate) Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid BUN Creat Bicab K UF Kt/V
  • 43.
  • 44.
    • CONCLUSIONS: • Basedon moderate (mortality, recovery of kidney function), low (infectious complications), or very low certainty evidence (correction of acidosis) there is probably little or no difference between PD and extracorporeal therapy for treating AKI. Fluid removal (low certainty) and weekly delivered Kt/V (very low certainty) may be higher with extracorporeal therapy. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 45.
    • Hemodynamic stabilityof the critically ill patient is the main determinant of the choice of dialysis modality (Palevsky et al, N Engl J Med, 2008) Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 46.
    Criteria of DifferentTherapies (Cerda´ and Ronco, Seminars in Dialysis, 2009)Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 47.
    Modalities and ClinicalOutcome Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 48.
  • 49.
    Figure 1 Kidney International2009 76, 422-427DOI: (10.1038/ki.2009.159) Copyright © 2009 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 50.
    Figure 2 Kidney International2009 76, 422-427DOI: (10.1038/ki.2009.159) Copyright © 2009 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 51.
    Figure 3 Kidney International2009 76, 422-427DOI: (10.1038/ki.2009.159) Copyright © 2009 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 52.
    Figure 4 Kidney International2009 76, 422-427DOI: (10.1038/ki.2009.159) Copyright © 2009 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 53.
    Renal Recovery • Forty-ninestudies were included • Conclusion: Findings of the conducted assessment show that initial CRRT is associated with higher rates of renal recovery. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 54.
    RRT and Recovery •Decision to initiation: • No clear effect on short and long term recovery • (Clec’h C, et al, Crit Care, 2011) • (Elseviers et al, Crit Care, 2010) • (Bagshaw et al, J Crit Care, 2013) BEST Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 55.
    Initial therapy, atleast with CRRT, may confer a higher likelihood of recovery to dialysis independence (Wald et al, Crit Care Med. 2014) (Glassford et al, Curr OpinCrit Care 2011) (Schneider et al, Intensive Care Med 2013)  RENAL and ATN (the reverse) RRT and Recovery Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 56.
    Impact on Modalityon Recovery (Schneider and Bagshaw, Nephron Clin Pract 2014)Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid Definition of Recovery
  • 57.
    Do You Trust? •IRRT: Lower illness severity • IRRT: Greater hemodynamic stability • Impact of original disease. • Other treatments. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 58.
    End Point ofRecovery • 30 d survival • 90 d survival • ICU stay • RRT dependence • 6m, 12 m survival • RIFLE improvement Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 59.
    • Retrospective cohort •2000 to 2008 who received RRT for AKI and survived to hospital discharge or 90 days • 4738 pt AKI KDIGO 3 • 638 (47.7%) survived to hospital discharge • Renal recovery (alive and not requiring RRT • 90 and 365 days. Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 60.
    • No significantdifference in hazards for non- recovery or reasons for non-recovery (mortality or ESRD) with intermittent hemodialysis versus continuous RRT Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 61.
    Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid Trucheet al, Intensive Care Med (2016)
  • 62.
    • CRRT didnot appear to improve 30-day and 6- month patient outcomes. It seems beneficial for patients with fluid overload, but might be deleterious in the absence of hemodynamic failure. (Truche et al ,Intensive Care Medicine, 2016) Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 63.
  • 64.
    • Hemodynamic stabilityis the main determinant of modality choice. • Clearance is better achieved by combination of diffusion and convection. • Specific indications for CRRT. • Volume overload and renal recovery. • CRRT and recovery ??? Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 65.
    Egyptian Nephrology Guidelines( Part 1 ) Dialysis in AKI Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid Prof. Yasser Abdelhamid
  • 66.