Fundamental Elements 2017 Webinar 1: Development of an Advanced RAIM multi-constellation receiver Corrigendum: Slide 15, first award criterion, second bullet:  “Requirements identification, development and testing of developed receiver” should replace the older version:  “Requirement identification, development and testing methodology”

1. Development of an Advanced RAIM
multi-constellation receiver
Katerina Strelcova, Aviation Market Development Innovation Officer
Vincenza de Tommaso, Financial Officer
Alina Hriscu, Market Development Officer
Fundamental Elements Webinar, 29th March 2017

2. 2
• Participants’ microphones are muted. To
avoid any echo, please switch off your
microphone.
• Make sure your speakers or headphones
are switched on, and turn up the
volume.
• To interact you can use the common chat
room. Questions to individual
participants will not be answered.
• Your questions will appear anonymously
to the other participants
Before we start – way of working (1/2)

3. • Questions are collected and addressed at the end of
the session, if time allows it.
• All questions and answers will be published on the
GSA website in order to guarantee the equal
treatment of tenderers/applicants.
• Slides and clarifications will be available in due course
online after this webinar.
• After the information session, you will receive a short
satisfaction questionnaire, please fill it in.
3
Before we start – way of working (2/2)

4.  CALL BACKGROUND
 TECHNICAL SCOPE
 ELIGIBLE PARTICIPANTS
 HOW TO PREPARE YOUR PROPOSAL
 GRANT AGREEMENT
 Q&A TIME
Agenda
4

5. • Specific ARAIM Technical Sub-Group (TSG) established in
2010
‒ under the U.S.-EU Agreement on GPS-Galileo Cooperation signed
in 2004 on the cooperation activities between the USA and the
EU in the field of satellite navigation
‒ aims to develop an advanced integrity concept in civil aviation
‒ to develop a solution to ensure navigation integrity for en-route
flight, terminal, and approach operations, which should support
lateral and vertical guidance down to a Decision Height/Altitude
(DH/DA) of 200 feet
‒ produced 3 reports publicly available
‒ defined roadmap
EU-US ARAIM Technical Sub-Group
5

6. • Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring is a concept
with the intention to provide a global integrity service based on
multiple satellite constellation
• The ARAIM concept is based on three possible architectures
enabling different level of performance:
‒ Horizontal ARAIM, to support horizontal navigation based on an occasional
Integrity Support Message (ISM) updates
‒ Offline ARAIM, to support horizontal and vertical navigation based on a
monthly Integrity Support Message (ISM) updates
‒ Online ARAIM, to support horizontal and vertical navigation based on an
Integrity Support Message (ISM) frequently updates (e.g. every 12 minutes)
ARAIM
6

7. OBJECTIVES OF THE CALL
7

8. • To develop, test and assess the performance of an
ARAIM receiver’s prototype, following the guidelines
defined by the ARAIM TSG (Technical Sub Group).
• To characterise, consolidate and validate the local
effects of the threat model as specified by the ARAIM
TSG.
• To contribute to the standardisation activities on
ARAIM.
Objective of the Call
8

9. Expected project flow
9

10. • Aims to define the requirements and implementing
the ARAIM receiver’s first version prototype
1) Define all receiver’s requirements (functional,
safety, performance)
2) Design and develop the prototype receiver using
the most updated ARAIM reference algorithm
available
3) Consolidate a performance validation plan
TASK 1
10

11. • Aims to assess the achievable performance of the
implemented receiver’s prototype
• Testing execution:
1) in a simulated environment (with support of JRC)
2) using real GNSS signal in a number of representative scenarios (real
signal validation)
• ARAIM receiver performance to be assessed against SoL
requirements
TASK 2
11
NOTE: Tests to be conducted in coordination with other relevant projects

12. • R&D FOR ADVANCED RECEIVER AUTONOMOUS INTEGRITY MONITORING:
ARAIM DEMONSTRATOR
‒ ARAIM Demonstrator development including tests with real Galileo Signal In Space (SIS)
• AVIATION STANDARDISATION FOR MULTICONSTELLATION (ATLAS)
‒ draft technical standards for implementation of multiconstellation/dual frequency, next
generation SBAS and Advanced RAIM techniques, as aviation receiver standards are
currently published for GPS stand-alone and GPS/SBAS equipment
• AVIATION DFMC SBAS RECEIVER PROTOTYPE
‒ design, develop and test a prototype of the DFMC SBAS user terminal for the aviation SoL
service, augmenting GPS and Galileo capabilities including Horizontal-ARAIM and RAIM
Other initiatives related to ARAIM
12
Applicants shall propose a project plan aiming at maximising the effectiveness of the project
results allowing for the interaction with the above as minimum or any other relevant projects.

13. TASK 3
13
• Transversal activity
1) Disseminate of the project results
- including at least 2 technical papers to international conferences
2) Contribute to standardisation activities
- if the results deemed satisfactory and meaningful as an input
3) Provide technical support to GSA/EC

14. Minimum list of deliverables
14
Work plan
ARAIM receiver
Requirements
Justification File
Safety assessment
document
Preliminary
architecture of the
ARAIM receiver
Detailed architecture
and Design Justification
File of the ARAIM
receiver
Error model –
characterisation and
validation
ARAIM prototype
validation plan against
SoL operations
requirements
Validation report
Testing tool
specifications
Testing tool validation
plan and report
Dissemination Plan
Report on the
Demonstration
activities
Roadmap for
operational
implementation (H-
ARAIM, V-ARAIM)
Dissemination
documents and multi-
media
ARAIM receiver
prototypes
ARAIM receiver
requirements
document
Demonstration kit
Report on the
Demonstration of the
ARAIM receiver
prototypes
Demonstration training
material
Report about the status
of implementation of
the dissemination plan
only in case the demo is proposed by the applicant
DEL v0 ~ preliminary deliverable to be included in the proposal
DEL v1 ~ as defined in the Call text

15. Award criteria
15
Relevance, credibility of the proposed
approach and innovation of the
solution proposed
(max 50)
Impact in terms of
economic and public
benefits
(max 20)
Coherence and
effectiveness of the work
plan, appropriate task
and resources allocation
(max 30)
 Relevance and quality of
 the proposed validation approach
(Preliminary DEL 8)
 Requirements identification,
development and testing of
developed receiver
 the methodology to characterize the
ARAIM errors (Preliminary DEL 7)
 Overall proposal quality in term of
deliverables, their content and structure
 The main key stakeholders involvement
 Roadmap for operational
implementation of H-ARAIM
and V-ARAIM (Preliminary
DEL 14)
 Maximisation of the benefits
to citizens by the adoption
of the results in market
 Representation of
companies with their
headquarters geographically
based in EU member State ,
Norway or Switzerland
 Consistency of the work
plan
 Appropriate management
structure, procedures
 Coherent activity
definition, schedule, effort
and cost
 Appropriate task and
resources distribution
 Credible and effective
dissemination plan
(Preliminary DEL 12)
If a total score lower than 60 points or a score lower than 60% for any of the above three criteria is obtained, the proposal

16. Call timeline (indicative)
16
Stage Deadline
Publication of the call 28 February 2017
Deadline for request for clarifications 26 April 2017
Publication of the clarifications 3 May 2017
Deadline for submission of applications 19 May 2017
Evaluation period June - July 2017
Information to applicants on the outcome of the
evaluation
August - September 2017
Signature of the Grant Agreement October 2017

17. • Maximum total budget allocated to the call: EUR 2.500.000
• Maximum number of projects: 2
• Indicative EU financing per project up to: EUR 1.250.000
• Maximum EU financing rate of eligible costs: 70%
• Maximum duration of the action: 2 years
Budget allocation and duration
17

18. ELIGIBLE PARTICIPANTS
18

19. Participation conditions
19
• Applications by legal persons established1 in and/or natural person(s) being nationals of
any of the EU Member States, Switzerland or Norway.
1 Legal persons are considered to be established in the EU when they are formed in
accordance with the law of an EU Member State, Norway or Switzerland, and have
their central administration, registered office or principal place of business in an EU
Member State, Norway or Switzerland
• Applicants: active in the development and/or integration and/or performance
assessment of GNSS receivers and/or development and validation of safety-critical
software, and/or expert in the field of GNSS research and development (R&D), and/or
expert in the assessment or development of aviation standards and/or active in the
dissemination of the project’s results;
Eligible applicants
Only applicant consortia shall be eligible to participate in this call –
proposals by single legal or natural person shall not be admissible.

20. HOW TO PREPARE YOUR PROPOSAL
20

21.  The Administrative package
 The Technical package
 The Financial package
Summary of the proposals
21

22. Summary of the proposals
22
FORM CONTENT CO-ORDINATOR CO-APPLICANT(S)
A1 PROPOSAL OVERVIEW X
A2 PROPOSAL SUMMARY X
A3 COORDINATOR PROFILE X
A4 CO-APPLICANT PROFILE X
A5 DECLARATION OF HONOUR X X
A6 FINANCIAL CAPACITY X X
B1 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL X
B2 OPERATIONAL CAPACITY X X
C1 PRELIMINARY BUDGET X X
ADMIN
PACKAGE
TECHNICAL
PACKAGE
FINANCIAL
PACKAGE

23.  Admin package:
WHO does WHAT?
23
FORM CONTENT Co-ordinator Co-applicant(s)
Affiliated
entity
A1
PROPOSAL
OVERVIEW
X
A2
PROPOSAL
SUMMARY
X
A3
COORDINATOR
PROFILE
X
A4
CO-APPLICANT
PROFILE
X
A5
DECLARATION OF
HONOUR
X X X
A6 FINANCIAL CAPACITY X X X

24. 24
Admin package – overview of forms
Cover page
It serves 2 purposes:
COVER PAGE (TO BE FILLED BY THE COORDINATOR + GSA)
 Checklist for the applicants: list of the submission set +
number of docs to be submitted
 Basic information on the Proposal for GSA: project
acronym and consortium composition + receipt of the
documents.

25. 25
Admin package – overview of forms
Form A1 & Form A2
 Contact details: Name/Surname, Organisation, ..
 Proposal Abstract: high level description of the proposed technical solution
 About the participants: name, role in the project and represented country
FORM A1. PROPOSAL OVERVIEW (TO BE FILLED BY THE COORDINATOR)
FORM A2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY (TO BE FILLED BY THE COORDINATOR)
 Objectives of the proposal: target of the proposal, including value proposition and
benefit for the users
 Description of the work: high level project’s workflow
 Milestone and Expected results

26. 26
Admin package – overview of forms
Form A3 & Form A4
FORM A3. COORDINATOR PROFILE
(TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE COORDINATOR WITH: LEGAL ENTITY AND FINANCIAL IDENTIFICATION FORMS)
 Legal Information: LEF (Legal Entity Form: private or public company, registration info)
 Financial Identification: (FIF) banking details and account holder’s info
 Power of attorney: to commit the company/organisation
 Information on co-financing: how the applicant would do it? under which form?
 Previous EU contracts/grants: to check the no-double payment principle.
 Stamp: in UK it’s not common however for admin purposes EC needs it!
FORM A4. CO-APPLICANT PROFILE
(TO BE FILLED BY THE CO-APPLICANTS WITH: LEGAL ENTITY FORM)
 Same as for Coordinator: to be filled by the co-applicant.

27. 27
Admin package – overview of forms
Form A5 & A6
FORM A5. DECLARATION OF HONOUR
(TO BE SUBMITTED BY ALL APPLICANTS – INCLUDING AFFILIATED ENTITIES)
 It serves to check the exclusion and selection criteria
 Generic text used by EU.
 (The template was made after the amendment of the EU Financial Regulations as of 1 Jan
2016.)
 If requested consider to start early enough collecting all the evidences; since might be
time consuming
FORM A6. FINANCIAL CAPACITY
(TO BE SUBMITTED BY ALL APPLICANTS – INCLUDING AFFILIATED ENTITIES)

28.  Technical package:
WHO does WHAT?
28
FORM CONTENT Co-ordinator Co-applicant(s)
Affiliated
entity
B1
TECHNICAL
PROPOSAL
X
B2
OPERATIONAL
CAPACITY
X X X

29. 29
Technical package
• Every proposal shall be assessed against the criteria
set out in the relevant Call for Proposal.
• In particular, for the technical package:
The Technical proposal (B1 Form) shall be assessed against
the AWARD criteria (CfP sect. 9)
The Operational capacity (B2 Form) shall be assessed against
the SELECTION criteria (CfP sect. 8.2)

30. 30
Technical package – overview of forms
Form B1
The co-ordinator, on behalf of the consortium, shall
submit the TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
1. CONCEPT and APPROACH (max. 30 pages)
2. EXPECTED IMPACT (max. 10 pages)
3. IMPLEMENTATION (max. 20 pages)
4. TECHNICAL ANNEXES

31. 1. This section shall contain, as minimum:
 Description of the proposed technical solution and its compliance with the
CfP’s objectives
 Technology involved (focusing on innovation elements), E-GNSS
differentiators, etc.
 Description of the applied methodologies which shall be used in the
implementation of the action
 The feasibility of the proposal targeting market implementation
 Considerations about the engagement of the key stakeholders (e.g. chipset
manufacturer, system integrator, service provider, etc.)
31
Technical package – overview of forms
Form B1: Concept and approach

32. 32
Technical package – overview of forms
Form B1: Expected impact
2. This section shall at least address the following topics:
 Which benefits to the user will derive from the implementation of the
project? Which additional applications shall be enabled?
 Elaboration of a Preliminary Business Plan, describing the strategy to
exploit the results.
 Elaboration of a Preliminary Dissemination Plan, establishing the
measures to disseminate the achievements of the project among
relevant stakeholders in the appropriate phases of the project

33. 33
Technical package – overview of forms
Form B1: Implementation (1/2)
3. Structured section guiding the applicant through the following
points:
 Work Plan definition
 Work Packages: description, effort, resp., objectives, etc.
 WP schedule: Gantt chart, or similar
 WP inter-dependencies: Pert chart, or similar
 List of Deliverables (e.g. specification, report, demo kit, etc.)
 Project management
 Milestones, and relevant decision making
 Preliminary Risk register

34. 34
Technical package – overview of forms
Form B1: Implementation (2/2)
3. Structured section guiding the applicant through the following
points:
 Consortium as a whole:
 Partners complementarity
 Tasks allocation
 Effectiveness in the project execution and to target
commercialisation
 Project’s Resources:
 Planned staff effort
 Other Direct Costs
 Subcontracting
 Budget overview

35. 35
Technical package – overview of forms
Form B1: Technical annexes
4. Table to be filled out with the following information:
 Partners name (Organisation/Company)
 Company category (e.g. Research institute, chipset manufacturer, other)
 Country
Legal person: origin meaning “established”: having a registered office OR
central administration OR principal place of business in one of those
countries.
Natural Person: citizenship

36. 36
Technical package – overview of forms
Form B1: Operational capacity
Every applicant (coordinator and co-applicants), shall
submit the OPERATIONAL CAPACITY Form.
Objective: to demonstrate compliance with SELECTION criteria set out in the
CfP
Ref. CfP section 8.2 – “Applicants must show they have the operational
(technical and management) capacity to complete the activities to be
supported by this Call for Proposal and must demonstrate their capacity to
manage the activities corresponding to the size of the project for which the
grant is requested.”

37. 37
FORM CONTENT CO-ORDINATOR CO-APPLICANT(S)
A1 PROPOSAL OVERVIEW X
A2 PROPOSAL SUMMARY X
A3 COORDINATOR PROFILE X
A4 CO-APPLICANT PROFILE X
A5 DECLARATION OF HONOUR X X
A6 FINANCIAL CAPACITY X X
B1 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL X
B2 OPERATIONAL CAPACITY X X
C1 PRELIMINARY BUDGET X X
ADMIN
PACKAGE
TECHNICAL
PACKAGE
FINANCIAL
PACKAGE
 Financial package:
WHO does WHAT?

38. • Filled in with figures from your annual (audited)
accounts
• GSA calculates ratios (e.g. profitability, indebtedness,
financial independence)
• Used to assess your financial viability
Not applicable to public bodies and international
organisations
Financial package – overview of forms
Form A6: Financial capacity (1/2)
38

39. If outcome of the check is not satisfactory and in any other case GSA can:
• request further information
• propose a grant agreement without pre-financing
• propose a grant agreement with a pre-financing paid in instalments;
• propose a grant agreement with a lower percentage of a pre-financing;
• propose a grant agreement with a pre-financing covered by a bank
guarantee
• reject the application
39
Financial package – overview of forms
Form A6: Financial capacity (2/2)

40. Financial package – overview of forms
Form C1: Estimated budget
40
Project Name Participant Name
Project Acronym
Estimated eligible direct costs
Estimated eligible indirect
costs Total estimated eligible costs
Total requested GSAgrant
(EUR) (EUR) (EUR) (EUR)
A B C = A+B D = 70% x C
Direct eligible costs
(Numbering of categories as in "Eligible Costs for
the grants" section 12.2 of the Call for Proposals -
apply the rules detailed thereunder)
declared on the basis of flat rate of 7%
of 1. + 2. without costs of
subcontractors, costs of third parties
not working on beneficiary premises,
and cost of financial support to 3rd
parties
Total requested GSA grant at the
maximum reimbursment rate of 70%of
total costs
1.1 Personnel under direct empl. contract 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
1.2 Personnel under other than under empl.
contract (in-house consultants)
0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
Sub-total for cost category 1 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
2.1 Travel costs 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
2.2 Costs for equipment and other assets
procured for the action
2.2 a) Costs for equipment and other assets
procured for the action: Full purchase costs
2.2 b) Costs for equipment and other assets
procured for the action: Depreciation costs
0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
2.3 Costs for equipment or other assets not
procured but used for the action (depreciation
costs)
0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
2.4 Costs for rental or lease of equipment or
other assets only to the portion of use and
limited to the duration of the action
0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
2.5 Costs for use of technical facilities or
laboratories
0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
2.6 Costs for consumables and supplies 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
2.7 Costs arising directly from requirements
imposed by the grant agreement
0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
2.8 Costs entailed by subcontracts as
described in the proposal
0.00 € Not applicable 0.00 € 0.00 €
2.9 costs of financial support to third parties
2.10 Duties, taxes and charges paid by the
beneficiary
0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
Sub-total for cost category 2 0.00 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
Total direct eligible costs 0.00 €
Total indirect eligible costs 0.00 €
Total eligible costs 0.00 €
5. Total EU contribution 0.00 €
Not applicable in this call for proposals
ESTIMATED BUDGET
Not applicable in this call for proposals
Estimated eligible costs of the action and GSA contribution (Table 1)
1. PERSONNEL COSTS
2. OTHER DIRECT COSTS

41. • During evaluation it will be checked:
‒ Staff effort – in relation to estimated budget for
personnel
‒ Description of other direct costs
‒ List of subcontracts
‒ Cumulative budget overview
Financial package – overview of forms
Form B1: Technical proposal
41
The amounts
should fit with
amounts in C1
Form

42. • 3 payments in total:
‒ Pre-financing 30%
‒ Interim payment up to 40%
‒ Final payment (30-70%)
Payment scheme
42

43. • When the tasks in B1 cannot be done by the consortium
• Principles:
‒ Best value for money or the lowest price
‒ No Conflict of Interest
‒ May only cover a limited part of the action and can not cover the core activities
‒ Necessary for implementation
‒ Stated in the proposal and in estimated budget
Subcontracting among beneficiaries is not possible!
Subcontracting
43

44. GRANT AGREEMENT
44

45. Draft Grant Agreement
45
• NOT part of the submitted proposal
• Please read it before submitting a proposal!
• It contains important elements on payments,
reporting, IPR etc.

46. • GSA: Legal and Procurement Department
• E-mail address: gnss.grants@gsa.europa.eu
• Office address: GSA, Janovského 438/2, 170 00, Prague 7, Czech
Republic
Contact coordinates for the call
46
Submit requests for clarifications by: 26 April 2017
Submit proposals by: 19 May 2017
Please refer in the subject to the relevant reference number of the Call
GSA/GRANT/01/2017