This document discusses strategies for assessing speaking skills in a second language. It describes the characteristics of spoken language, such as variation in speed, loudness, gestures, intonation, stress, rhythm, and pausing. It presents several methods for assessing speaking, including role plays, interviews, oral presentations, picture-cued story telling, and translations. Role plays can be structured or unstructured. Interviews involve warming up, level-checking, probing, and winding down. It's important to determine the appropriate criteria and tasks for assessing fluency versus accuracy in speaking.
This document discusses factors related to assessing speaking proficiency, including the constructs of speaking, oral development processes, task design, and performance conditions. It addresses linguistic features of speech, construction of speaking tasks, and circumstances of performance such as planning and examination context. Key aspects of speaking that can be observed and evaluated are discussed, such as involvement, fragmentation, and editing features. The roles of declarative and procedural knowledge in methodology are also covered.
Speaking Assessment_Language Assessment - By Sheila CheiSheila Wijayanti
This document discusses assessing speaking ability in English. It outlines basic types of speaking like imitative, intensive, responsive and interactive. It recommends choosing an appropriate technique to elicit a valid oral sample, such as interviews, role plays, or responses to audio recordings. The document provides a rating scale from 1 to 6 to evaluate ability to communicate orally based on ease, errors, and difficulty experienced by native English speakers. It stresses creating reliable scales to score aspects of speaking like accuracy, appropriateness, range, flexibility and size.
This document discusses various types and methods of assessing speaking skills. It describes imitative speaking, which tests pronunciation and comprehension through repetition of words, phrases, and sentences. Intensive speaking assesses grammatical competence through short responses, while extensive speaking evaluates longer monologues. Different task types are outlined for intensive and extensive speaking, such as direct responses, read alouds, and picture-cued storytelling. Scoring speaking presents challenges in clearly defining criteria and establishing reliability.
This document discusses how to assess students' speaking skills. It recommends designing speaking tests with lower teacher participation, creating a list of objectives, including different speaking tasks, designing an evaluation rubric, and providing feedback. Some common speaking tasks are classroom participation, presentations, and weekly voice journals. An example assessment asks students to choose a topic, prepare for 4 minutes, present on the procedure and results, and grade their peers using a rubric. The overall purpose is to determine if learning objectives have been achieved.
1) The document describes a workshop used to help teachers assess students' speaking skills by making them more aware of the different criteria they could use and how the criteria should depend on the testing context.
2) The workshop involves teachers viewing student speaking samples, discussing what criteria affect their evaluations, being introduced to a list of common criteria, and examining how the criteria selection depends on factors like the test purpose and administration process.
3) The goal is to improve the validity and reliability of speaking assessments by making the criteria choices and weightings more explicit and tailored to the testing context.
This document discusses different types and methods for assessing speaking ability. It describes 5 types of speaking from imitative to extensive. For assessment, it proposes tasks that elicit imitative, intensive, responsive, interactive, and extensive speaking. Tasks include repetition, picture cues, questions, role plays, interviews, instructions, and translations. The document provides examples and discusses how to design valid, reliable speaking assessments through clear procedures, appropriate elicitation, and consistent scoring.
This document discusses various methods for assessing speaking ability, including imitative, intensive, responsive, and interactive tasks. Imitative tasks involve repeating words or sentences to assess pronunciation. Intensive tasks elicit short stretches of oral production to demonstrate competence in narrow grammatical areas. Responsive tasks involve question-and-answer exchanges and instructions. Interactive tasks assess longer conversations and include job interviews with warm-up, level check, and wind-down stages. Proper task design and reliable scoring methods are important for valid speaking assessments.
This document discusses strategies for assessing speaking skills in a second language. It describes the characteristics of spoken language, such as variation in speed, loudness, gestures, intonation, stress, rhythm, and pausing. It presents several methods for assessing speaking, including role plays, interviews, oral presentations, picture-cued story telling, and translations. Role plays can be structured or unstructured. Interviews involve warming up, level-checking, probing, and winding down. It's important to determine the appropriate criteria and tasks for assessing fluency versus accuracy in speaking.
This document discusses factors related to assessing speaking proficiency, including the constructs of speaking, oral development processes, task design, and performance conditions. It addresses linguistic features of speech, construction of speaking tasks, and circumstances of performance such as planning and examination context. Key aspects of speaking that can be observed and evaluated are discussed, such as involvement, fragmentation, and editing features. The roles of declarative and procedural knowledge in methodology are also covered.
Speaking Assessment_Language Assessment - By Sheila CheiSheila Wijayanti
This document discusses assessing speaking ability in English. It outlines basic types of speaking like imitative, intensive, responsive and interactive. It recommends choosing an appropriate technique to elicit a valid oral sample, such as interviews, role plays, or responses to audio recordings. The document provides a rating scale from 1 to 6 to evaluate ability to communicate orally based on ease, errors, and difficulty experienced by native English speakers. It stresses creating reliable scales to score aspects of speaking like accuracy, appropriateness, range, flexibility and size.
This document discusses various types and methods of assessing speaking skills. It describes imitative speaking, which tests pronunciation and comprehension through repetition of words, phrases, and sentences. Intensive speaking assesses grammatical competence through short responses, while extensive speaking evaluates longer monologues. Different task types are outlined for intensive and extensive speaking, such as direct responses, read alouds, and picture-cued storytelling. Scoring speaking presents challenges in clearly defining criteria and establishing reliability.
This document discusses how to assess students' speaking skills. It recommends designing speaking tests with lower teacher participation, creating a list of objectives, including different speaking tasks, designing an evaluation rubric, and providing feedback. Some common speaking tasks are classroom participation, presentations, and weekly voice journals. An example assessment asks students to choose a topic, prepare for 4 minutes, present on the procedure and results, and grade their peers using a rubric. The overall purpose is to determine if learning objectives have been achieved.
1) The document describes a workshop used to help teachers assess students' speaking skills by making them more aware of the different criteria they could use and how the criteria should depend on the testing context.
2) The workshop involves teachers viewing student speaking samples, discussing what criteria affect their evaluations, being introduced to a list of common criteria, and examining how the criteria selection depends on factors like the test purpose and administration process.
3) The goal is to improve the validity and reliability of speaking assessments by making the criteria choices and weightings more explicit and tailored to the testing context.
This document discusses different types and methods for assessing speaking ability. It describes 5 types of speaking from imitative to extensive. For assessment, it proposes tasks that elicit imitative, intensive, responsive, interactive, and extensive speaking. Tasks include repetition, picture cues, questions, role plays, interviews, instructions, and translations. The document provides examples and discusses how to design valid, reliable speaking assessments through clear procedures, appropriate elicitation, and consistent scoring.
This document discusses various methods for assessing speaking ability, including imitative, intensive, responsive, and interactive tasks. Imitative tasks involve repeating words or sentences to assess pronunciation. Intensive tasks elicit short stretches of oral production to demonstrate competence in narrow grammatical areas. Responsive tasks involve question-and-answer exchanges and instructions. Interactive tasks assess longer conversations and include job interviews with warm-up, level check, and wind-down stages. Proper task design and reliable scoring methods are important for valid speaking assessments.
This document discusses how to properly assess speaking skills. It emphasizes using a clear test purpose, suitable test constructs, and a range of task types. Speaking tests should include a variety of tasks like monologues, interactions, and paired activities. Assessment should consider cognitive knowledge, processing abilities, and automaticity. Tasks can vary in difficulty based on factors like familiarity and abstractness of topics, as well as speech functions. Tests should use clear instructions and a justified ordering of tasks. Scoring can be done through holistic or analytical scales, with each approach having strengths and limitations.
This document discusses assessment of speaking skills and provides guidance on how to effectively test speaking. It identifies key aspects to evaluate such as vocabulary, grammar, fluency, pronunciation, and task completion. Both holistic and analytic scoring methods are described, with holistic providing a quick overall score but less diagnostic feedback, while analytic takes more time but provides useful information on individual skill areas. The document also lists common speaking tasks, advantages and disadvantages of speaking tests, and factors that can affect task performance like instructions, timing, and marking criteria.
The document discusses assessing speaking skills in students. It begins by defining speaking and listing reasons to assess it, such as helping students and teachers understand strengths and weaknesses. It then covers what speaking involves, including micro and macro factors. The document provides guidance on planning a speaking assessment, such as choosing learning outcomes, designing a test or activity, developing a rubric, and considering the testing environment. Sample rubrics are included that assess pronunciation, vocabulary, accuracy, fluency, non-verbal communication skills, and ability to communicate. The document concludes by discussing next steps after assessment, such as remedial planning, feedback, and analyzing results data.
This document discusses methods for assessing speaking ability. It outlines structured and observational approaches, with the structured approach involving tasks to evaluate specific oral skills and the observational approach unobtrusively observing natural speech. Rating systems can be holistic, providing an overall impression, or analytic, evaluating various communication aspects. Factors like linguistic competence, functional competence, and sociolinguistic competence are also discussed. The document provides details on testing speaking such as format, content, performance conditions, stimulus, timing, scoring, and considers valid assessment formats. Principles of assessment speaking are outlined related to reliability, validity, practicality, authenticity, approach, and wash back.
The document discusses various methods for assessing speaking ability, divided into 5 basic types - imitative, intensive, responsive, interactive, and extensive. It then provides details on designing assessment tasks for each type. For imitative speaking, tasks include repetition and read-alouds. Intensive tasks include directed responses, fill-in-the-blank dialogs, and picture prompts. Responsive tasks involve questions and answers or giving instructions. Interactive tasks include interviews, role-plays, and discussions. Extensive tasks include oral presentations, storytelling, and translations. The document emphasizes matching tasks to objectives and establishing reliable scoring criteria.
This document discusses key considerations for assessing speaking skills. It addresses why a 60-70% score is usually passing, what makes speaking difficult to test, different types of speaking tasks, and factors that affect task fairness. It emphasizes that speaking involves many subskills performed automatically, and that tests need a clear purpose and a range of task types matched to the construct. Raters should use suitable assessment scales and criteria to reliably score performances.
Challenges in the teaching and testing of speakingC Romney
This document discusses challenges in teaching and testing speaking skills. It is divided into four parts: 1) defining speaking and its genres, 2) how to teach conversation skills, 3) common evaluation methods, and 4) ideas to improve teaching and testing. The key points are that speaking encompasses different genres beyond presentations and interviews; conversation is the most important skill but often not taught or tested; and evaluations should match what is taught in the classroom.
The document discusses various methods for assessing speaking skills in tests. It describes a continuum of speaking tasks from imitative to extensive. Imitative tasks involve simple repetition, while intensive tasks assess narrow grammatical skills through short responses. Responsive tasks involve simple interactions, and interactive tasks have longer, more complex exchanges. Extensive speaking includes speeches and presentations with limited feedback. The document also discusses techniques like role plays, interviews and games to assess speaking at different levels.
The document discusses various techniques for teaching speaking skills, including both direct and indirect approaches. It emphasizes using tasks that focus on meaningful communication over language practice. Specific techniques mentioned include conversation practice, transactional activities like ordering from a catalog, and individual oral dialogue journals. Principles for designing speaking techniques include using a variety that cover accuracy and fluency, providing meaningful contexts, feedback, and opportunities for student initiation of oral communication. The document also discusses teaching pronunciation and considerations around error correction.
From the CALPER/LARC Testing and Assessment Webinar Series
Download the handouts and ppt: https://larc.sdsu.edu/archived-events/
View the recording: http://vimeo.com/58413470
Presentation Description
The word assessment comes from the Latin assidere, meaning to sit beside. This notion evokes the image of learner and teacher working together to improve learning and teaching. Involving learners in assessment helps them reflect on their learning, set goals, monitor progress, and regularly evaluate their goals. In the case of listening, learners become aware of the cognitive processes and develop greater metacognitive awareness of listening to help them better regulate their comprehension processes. This leads to greater learner investment and motivation and, ultimately, autonomous language learners.
Comprehension, the product of listening, can be assessed by a variety of informal and formal methods. In this webinar, we will examine and discuss a number of examples of formative assessment of listening. We will then discuss some issues related to these examples, as well as some well-known examples of summative assessment, in light of five important criteria: 1) validity; 2) reliability; 3) authenticity; 4) washback; and 5) practicality.
Webinar Date: 2/23/2012
This document provides an overview of assessing listening skills. It discusses the nature of listening as an active process using linguistic and non-linguistic cues. Key concepts in language assessment like practicality, reliability, validity and authenticity are also covered. The document outlines observing performance through multiple tests, tasks and forms of assessment. It describes the importance of listening and basic types of listening like intensive, responsive, selective and extensive. Microskills and macroskills of listening are defined. The document provides examples of designing assessment tasks for intensive listening focusing on recognizing phonological/morphological elements and paraphrase recognition.
Language Assessment - Assessing Listening by EFL LearningEFL Learning
The importance and basic type of listening, micro- and macro skills of Listening, and how to observing the performance and designed the assessment tasks
While assessing Language acquisition, one of the most difficult skill to assess is listening. This presentation explores methods that can be used to assess listening - intensive, responsive, selective and extensive. This also looks at some tasks that can be used to assess listening. The presentation is based on the book published by Brown on Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practice published by Longman. The presentation was created by Shama Kalam Siddiqui for presentation and talk at Ateneo De Manila University for a Masters in English and Literature Teaching Program.
The document discusses several topics related to teaching oral communication skills, including pronunciation teaching, accuracy versus fluency, affective factors, and interaction effects. It provides examples of micro-skills involved in oral communication, such as producing chunks of language, stress patterns, and strategic devices. The document also discusses factors that affect pronunciation learning, such as native language and age, and provides a model for correcting speech errors. Overall, the document offers guidance on techniques for developing students' oral communication abilities.
This document discusses teaching oral skills to English language learners. It outlines some of the challenges of teaching oral skills, such as lack of student motivation and large class sizes. It then describes various speaking activities that can be used, including discussions, speeches, role plays, conversations, and using audio media. For discussions, it recommends giving students specific roles and clarifying expectations. For speeches, it notes topics can vary by student level. Role plays are suitable for practicing social language. Conversations emphasize analyzing language use. The document concludes by discussing assessing classroom performance and ongoing developments that will impact language teaching.
The document discusses issues related to teaching pronunciation to language learners. It addresses whether there should be a focus on pronunciation and factors like accuracy, fluency, anxiety, and learning environment. It also discusses techniques like clustering, redundancy, rates of delivery, feedback, and avoiding fossilization. The techniques discussed are meant to cover learners' needs, be motivating, use authentic language, and focus on speaking and listening links.
The document discusses different types of listening assessment, including intensive listening, responsive listening, selective listening, and extensive listening. It provides examples of assessment tasks for each type, such as phonemic pair exercises, sentence paraphrasing, information transfer through pictures, and dictation. The document also discusses communicative stimulus-response tasks and more authentic assessment methods like note-taking, editing, interpretive tasks, retelling, and interactive listening.
This document discusses factors that make speaking a foreign language difficult and principles for designing speaking techniques and activities in the classroom. It addresses the following key points:
1) Successful language acquisition involves the ability to accomplish pragmatic goals through interactive discourse. Several factors make speaking difficult, including affective factors like anxiety, the interactive nature of communication, and performance variables like hesitations.
2) Speaking activities in the classroom include imitative, intensive, responsive, interactive, and extensive types. Techniques should be intrinsically motivating, address a range of learner needs, and provide appropriate feedback.
3) Teaching conversation can involve direct instruction of speaking skills or an indirect approach of conversation practice. Individual practice and other interactive techniques
This document discusses how to properly assess speaking skills. It emphasizes using a clear test purpose, suitable test constructs, and a range of task types. Speaking tests should include a variety of tasks like monologues, interactions, and paired activities. Assessment should consider cognitive knowledge, processing abilities, and automaticity. Tasks can vary in difficulty based on factors like familiarity and abstractness of topics, as well as speech functions. Tests should use clear instructions and a justified ordering of tasks. Scoring can be done through holistic or analytical scales, with each approach having strengths and limitations.
This document discusses assessment of speaking skills and provides guidance on how to effectively test speaking. It identifies key aspects to evaluate such as vocabulary, grammar, fluency, pronunciation, and task completion. Both holistic and analytic scoring methods are described, with holistic providing a quick overall score but less diagnostic feedback, while analytic takes more time but provides useful information on individual skill areas. The document also lists common speaking tasks, advantages and disadvantages of speaking tests, and factors that can affect task performance like instructions, timing, and marking criteria.
The document discusses assessing speaking skills in students. It begins by defining speaking and listing reasons to assess it, such as helping students and teachers understand strengths and weaknesses. It then covers what speaking involves, including micro and macro factors. The document provides guidance on planning a speaking assessment, such as choosing learning outcomes, designing a test or activity, developing a rubric, and considering the testing environment. Sample rubrics are included that assess pronunciation, vocabulary, accuracy, fluency, non-verbal communication skills, and ability to communicate. The document concludes by discussing next steps after assessment, such as remedial planning, feedback, and analyzing results data.
This document discusses methods for assessing speaking ability. It outlines structured and observational approaches, with the structured approach involving tasks to evaluate specific oral skills and the observational approach unobtrusively observing natural speech. Rating systems can be holistic, providing an overall impression, or analytic, evaluating various communication aspects. Factors like linguistic competence, functional competence, and sociolinguistic competence are also discussed. The document provides details on testing speaking such as format, content, performance conditions, stimulus, timing, scoring, and considers valid assessment formats. Principles of assessment speaking are outlined related to reliability, validity, practicality, authenticity, approach, and wash back.
The document discusses various methods for assessing speaking ability, divided into 5 basic types - imitative, intensive, responsive, interactive, and extensive. It then provides details on designing assessment tasks for each type. For imitative speaking, tasks include repetition and read-alouds. Intensive tasks include directed responses, fill-in-the-blank dialogs, and picture prompts. Responsive tasks involve questions and answers or giving instructions. Interactive tasks include interviews, role-plays, and discussions. Extensive tasks include oral presentations, storytelling, and translations. The document emphasizes matching tasks to objectives and establishing reliable scoring criteria.
This document discusses key considerations for assessing speaking skills. It addresses why a 60-70% score is usually passing, what makes speaking difficult to test, different types of speaking tasks, and factors that affect task fairness. It emphasizes that speaking involves many subskills performed automatically, and that tests need a clear purpose and a range of task types matched to the construct. Raters should use suitable assessment scales and criteria to reliably score performances.
Challenges in the teaching and testing of speakingC Romney
This document discusses challenges in teaching and testing speaking skills. It is divided into four parts: 1) defining speaking and its genres, 2) how to teach conversation skills, 3) common evaluation methods, and 4) ideas to improve teaching and testing. The key points are that speaking encompasses different genres beyond presentations and interviews; conversation is the most important skill but often not taught or tested; and evaluations should match what is taught in the classroom.
The document discusses various methods for assessing speaking skills in tests. It describes a continuum of speaking tasks from imitative to extensive. Imitative tasks involve simple repetition, while intensive tasks assess narrow grammatical skills through short responses. Responsive tasks involve simple interactions, and interactive tasks have longer, more complex exchanges. Extensive speaking includes speeches and presentations with limited feedback. The document also discusses techniques like role plays, interviews and games to assess speaking at different levels.
The document discusses various techniques for teaching speaking skills, including both direct and indirect approaches. It emphasizes using tasks that focus on meaningful communication over language practice. Specific techniques mentioned include conversation practice, transactional activities like ordering from a catalog, and individual oral dialogue journals. Principles for designing speaking techniques include using a variety that cover accuracy and fluency, providing meaningful contexts, feedback, and opportunities for student initiation of oral communication. The document also discusses teaching pronunciation and considerations around error correction.
From the CALPER/LARC Testing and Assessment Webinar Series
Download the handouts and ppt: https://larc.sdsu.edu/archived-events/
View the recording: http://vimeo.com/58413470
Presentation Description
The word assessment comes from the Latin assidere, meaning to sit beside. This notion evokes the image of learner and teacher working together to improve learning and teaching. Involving learners in assessment helps them reflect on their learning, set goals, monitor progress, and regularly evaluate their goals. In the case of listening, learners become aware of the cognitive processes and develop greater metacognitive awareness of listening to help them better regulate their comprehension processes. This leads to greater learner investment and motivation and, ultimately, autonomous language learners.
Comprehension, the product of listening, can be assessed by a variety of informal and formal methods. In this webinar, we will examine and discuss a number of examples of formative assessment of listening. We will then discuss some issues related to these examples, as well as some well-known examples of summative assessment, in light of five important criteria: 1) validity; 2) reliability; 3) authenticity; 4) washback; and 5) practicality.
Webinar Date: 2/23/2012
This document provides an overview of assessing listening skills. It discusses the nature of listening as an active process using linguistic and non-linguistic cues. Key concepts in language assessment like practicality, reliability, validity and authenticity are also covered. The document outlines observing performance through multiple tests, tasks and forms of assessment. It describes the importance of listening and basic types of listening like intensive, responsive, selective and extensive. Microskills and macroskills of listening are defined. The document provides examples of designing assessment tasks for intensive listening focusing on recognizing phonological/morphological elements and paraphrase recognition.
Language Assessment - Assessing Listening by EFL LearningEFL Learning
The importance and basic type of listening, micro- and macro skills of Listening, and how to observing the performance and designed the assessment tasks
While assessing Language acquisition, one of the most difficult skill to assess is listening. This presentation explores methods that can be used to assess listening - intensive, responsive, selective and extensive. This also looks at some tasks that can be used to assess listening. The presentation is based on the book published by Brown on Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practice published by Longman. The presentation was created by Shama Kalam Siddiqui for presentation and talk at Ateneo De Manila University for a Masters in English and Literature Teaching Program.
The document discusses several topics related to teaching oral communication skills, including pronunciation teaching, accuracy versus fluency, affective factors, and interaction effects. It provides examples of micro-skills involved in oral communication, such as producing chunks of language, stress patterns, and strategic devices. The document also discusses factors that affect pronunciation learning, such as native language and age, and provides a model for correcting speech errors. Overall, the document offers guidance on techniques for developing students' oral communication abilities.
This document discusses teaching oral skills to English language learners. It outlines some of the challenges of teaching oral skills, such as lack of student motivation and large class sizes. It then describes various speaking activities that can be used, including discussions, speeches, role plays, conversations, and using audio media. For discussions, it recommends giving students specific roles and clarifying expectations. For speeches, it notes topics can vary by student level. Role plays are suitable for practicing social language. Conversations emphasize analyzing language use. The document concludes by discussing assessing classroom performance and ongoing developments that will impact language teaching.
The document discusses issues related to teaching pronunciation to language learners. It addresses whether there should be a focus on pronunciation and factors like accuracy, fluency, anxiety, and learning environment. It also discusses techniques like clustering, redundancy, rates of delivery, feedback, and avoiding fossilization. The techniques discussed are meant to cover learners' needs, be motivating, use authentic language, and focus on speaking and listening links.
The document discusses different types of listening assessment, including intensive listening, responsive listening, selective listening, and extensive listening. It provides examples of assessment tasks for each type, such as phonemic pair exercises, sentence paraphrasing, information transfer through pictures, and dictation. The document also discusses communicative stimulus-response tasks and more authentic assessment methods like note-taking, editing, interpretive tasks, retelling, and interactive listening.
This document discusses factors that make speaking a foreign language difficult and principles for designing speaking techniques and activities in the classroom. It addresses the following key points:
1) Successful language acquisition involves the ability to accomplish pragmatic goals through interactive discourse. Several factors make speaking difficult, including affective factors like anxiety, the interactive nature of communication, and performance variables like hesitations.
2) Speaking activities in the classroom include imitative, intensive, responsive, interactive, and extensive types. Techniques should be intrinsically motivating, address a range of learner needs, and provide appropriate feedback.
3) Teaching conversation can involve direct instruction of speaking skills or an indirect approach of conversation practice. Individual practice and other interactive techniques
The document provides guidance on teaching speaking skills in the classroom. It begins by defining speaking and outlining the major speech types. It then discusses the linguistic elements involved in speaking and some of the difficult aspects. The document emphasizes teaching students to overcome these difficulties. It also outlines the micro and macro skills needed for oral communication and discusses factors that can affect students' spoken abilities. Principles for teaching speaking are presented along with sample lesson plans, activities for teachers and students, and suggestions to improve student responses.
Speaking is a complex skill that involves more than just pronouncing words. It is the process of building and sharing meaning through verbal and non-verbal communication in a variety of contexts. Speaking skills allow people to convey messages in a clear, thoughtful, and convincing manner so that listeners understand. Teaching speaking skills is important for activities like making presentations, having conversations, reporting information, and solving problems. However, developing strong speaking abilities requires overcoming barriers like a lack of confidence, practice opportunities, and attention to effective techniques.
1. Teaching oral skills is challenging as it requires integrating many subsystems simultaneously.
2. Effective methods focus on developing grammatical, sociolinguistic, discourse and strategic competence through activities like discussions, speeches, role-plays and interviews.
3. Teachers should balance accuracy and fluency, encourage student responsibility, and assess classroom performance and large-scale exam preparation.
This document discusses principles for teaching less commonly taught languages endorsed by STARTALK (Strategic Language Training and Research Training). It emphasizes using the target language for at least 90% of instruction time and making the language, culture and content comprehensible to students. To do so, teachers should paraphrase in simpler terms, use familiar structures and repeat key words and phrases. They should also use gestures, visual aids and meaningful contexts to aid understanding. Formative assessments and integrated performance tasks are recommended to evaluate students' knowledge and language skills. The goal is for students to interpret authentic materials and use the language for daily communication and knowledge acquisition.
This power point contains information about the basic concepts of teaching speaking in Second Language, paralinguistic features, phonemic system, paralinguistic features, features of spoken English and the current issues and trends in English language teaching.
Oral language assessment evaluates students' communication abilities. It examines how students use language both for basic interactions and academic purposes in various contexts like small group work, presentations, and classroom activities. Effective oral language assessment considers students' use of language functions to express meaning using communicative and academic language. It also plans assessments from the start of a unit to motivate students and recognize their accomplishments. Both informal observations and formal assessments throughout the year provide information on students' developing oral language skills, which form the basis for early literacy instruction.
Oral language assessment aims to evaluate students' ability to communicate effectively for both basic and academic purposes. There are many informal assessment tools used in schools, including observations of students' oral language in social, academic, and presentation contexts. Oral language assessments for English language learners also examine the language functions students use to express meaning, such as communicative and academic language functions. Initial, formative, and summative oral language assessments in primary grades provide information about students' skills as the basis for literacy instruction.
ACTFL Core Practices. Students Build Language Proficiency #wlclassroomJoshua Cabral
The ACTFL Core Practices provide guidelines and methodology for teaching foreign language so that students are using the language to communicate and move beyond simply knowing about the language.
The effectiveness of call on language learning by excellent private centerRatu Masrana
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CALL ON LANGUAGE LEARNING. This present how effect using CALL in learning. CALL is computer assisted language learning. Now is the modern era. We can use computer, gadget, etc to teach the students. The point is how to make the learning is effective.
Research in the Teaching of Speaking- U10d4Matarazzo27
The document summarizes research on teaching speaking skills. It focuses on 6 areas: the growing influence of spoken language corpora, debates on native and nonnative speaker models, issues of authenticity in spoken materials, modeling speaking in the classroom, descriptive frameworks for teaching speaking, and teaching genres of spoken interaction. It discusses challenges such as a lack of authenticity in scripted materials and difficulties for nonnative teachers to fully master new cultures and languages.
The document provides criticism of the Grammar Translation Method of teaching foreign languages. It notes that while the method has some benefits like easing vocabulary learning through translation, it has significant drawbacks. Specifically, it is unnatural compared to how languages are acquired, focuses too much on grammar at the expense of other skills, and positions language as collections of words rather than a system of communication. Overall, the Grammar Translation Method provides a limited and ineffective approach to teaching foreign language proficiency.
The document discusses oral communication skills and classroom speaking performance. It describes micro skills which refer to skills at the sentence level used in conversational discourse, and macro skills which are skills at the discourse level. It then outlines various linguistic skills required for oral production, including grammar, vocabulary, fluency, pronunciation, pragmatics, and language interaction. Finally, it discusses different types of speaking tasks that can be used in the classroom from imitative tasks that practice language forms, to intensive, responsive, transactional, interpersonal, and extensive speaking tasks which provide opportunities for meaningful interaction and language use.
The document discusses techniques for teaching speaking skills effectively in a second language classroom. It notes that the goal should be communicative efficiency. While variety of activities and interaction are beneficial for students, traditional speaking classes often lack preparation, explicit teaching of skills, strategy development, feedback and follow-up. The document provides suggestions for how teachers can structure speaking activities, including focusing on pronunciation, stressing intelligibility, providing preparation and multiple practice opportunities, and giving feedback to help students improve. It also discusses characteristics of successful speaking activities like pair/group work and keeping students actively speaking in the target language.
1) The document discusses the challenges of speaking in a second language and strategies to improve oral communication skills. It notes that speaking requires not just grammatical competence but understanding of social and cultural norms.
2) Several factors that can lead to mismatches in oral communication are explored, including lack of linguistic knowledge, different background knowledge between speakers, and differences in sociocultural expectations.
3) The document provides advice for language learners and teachers to help strengthen oral abilities, such as using compensatory strategies, engaging in activities like storytelling and discussions, and creating an supportive environment in the classroom.
The document discusses challenges teachers face in assessing students' oral language abilities and provides guidance on how to do so effectively. It notes that teachers must make time for assessment, select appropriate activities, and determine evaluation criteria. When assessing English learners, it is important to consider a student's ability to communicate for both basic and academic purposes. The document recommends focusing assessment on a student's capacity to interpret and convey meaning in authentic interactive contexts. It provides steps for effective oral language assessment, including identifying the assessment purpose, planning, developing rubrics, and setting standards.
The document provides guidance for teachers on developing students' oral language skills through carefully planned classroom interactions where English is the sole language used, and the teacher acts as a language model, guide, helper and ally by creating a comfortable environment and adjusting their language based on students' needs and abilities. It emphasizes acquiring functional language through natural language use, language routines, building up and breaking down vocabulary, and providing multiple opportunities for practice.
English Language Lab has a tradition of helping learners to improve their English, whether for work, personal enrichment or English for Academic Purposes. Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing (LSRW) are the four skills which play an important role in the acquisition of language and learning. The system ensures a stress free environment with high quality digital content.
Similar to Developing and assessing speaking in a competence based (20)
Language skills need to be assessed through well designed rubrics related to the educational purpose of the programme. It is highly recommended to record the results through rubrics with specific criteria and results intended.
Critical thinking embeds all the cognitive thinking skills of bloom's taxonomy. It is important for learners to understand what is critical thinking and how to use it in class.
Reflective teaching involves systematically collecting, recording, and analyzing observations of one's own teaching and students' learning in order to identify areas for improvement. Teachers can reflect by keeping a diary after each class, inviting peer observation with later discussion, recording lessons for self-analysis, and gathering student feedback through discussions or surveys. After reflection, teachers should discuss their performance with colleagues and students and write a new plan with improved strategies.
Teaching sources are tools to implement curricula. They are needed by teachers and learners to integrate language and cognitive skills in a social conduct. Kindly, read my previous article "Coursebook Evaluation" to learn more about coursebook features. Understanding the effective elements of a coursebook will help you decide the adaptability of a book.
Teachers can evaluate coursebooks. They use them frequently and make sure to adapt them to learners' needs. All what teachers need is to learn to set criteria and understand how and what to assess of a coursebook. Please, write your comment and share your own opinion of the topic. Your contribution matters.
Assessment of young learners (formative & summative)Noura Al-Budeiwi
This is a short presentation discusses what is assessment and its types, assessment tools, why do we have formative and summative assessment for young learners and its importance to teachers in class. Please, write your comments if you have any information to share.
Developing and assessing listening in a competence basedNoura Al-Budeiwi
This document discusses developing and assessing listening skills in a competence-based curriculum. It emphasizes that assessment should have a clear purpose, choose an appropriate method based on the context, and involve a process. Formative and summative assessments can include projects, games, worksheets, and tasks. Listening can be measured by aligning varied tasks to curriculum standards and descriptors, and using suitable assessment tools like observations, portfolios, and rubrics. Examples of listening descriptors in rubrics include recognizing and describing concepts, categories, and responding appropriately to questions.
Learner centered teaching and active learning strategiesNoura Al-Budeiwi
Active learning is best demonstrated in a learner-centered approach. This short article explores few active learning strategies and the use of technology in class. Feel free to comment in the comments section.
Collaborative learning and cooperative learning.mineNoura Al-Budeiwi
This article describes the differences and similarities of collaborative and cooperative learning. It also discusses their usage for young learners. Please add your own ideas and thoughts in the comment section.
Teachers can create interactive lessons for students in OneNote. Students can listen to audio, watch videos, and complete homework independently related to tasks. Teachers can add notebooks, pictures, recordings, videos, webpage links, text attachments, and link between notebooks and pages. The document provides instructions on how to insert these different media types and links in OneNote to create engaging lessons for students.
Developing and assessing writing skill in a competence based curriculum mineNoura Al-Budeiwi
This short article discusses developing the reading skill in a competence based curriculum in the new Kuwait National Curriculum. If you have more ideas, please do add a comment.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
2. SPEAKING SKILL
• It is challenging to have students acquire a foreign language in a spoken form.
The speaking skill needs practice outside class doors.
• “Brown (1994) labels speaking as the most challenging skill for students because
of the set of features that characterize oral discourse:
- Contractions, vowel reductions and elision;
- The use of slang and idioms;
- Stress, rhythm and intonation;
- The need to interact with at least one other speaker.”
3. SPEAKING SKILL
Speaking is an “activity requiring the integration of many subsystems…all these
factors combine to make speaking a second or foreign language a formidable
task for language learners…yet for many people, speaking is seen as the central
skill” (Bailey and Savage 1994: 6-7).
4. Authentic Dialogues
Have students speak through their own experiences in a conversation.
PBL
Have students communicate while making a project. It might be challenging to have
them not speak in their own mother tongue; encouragement is needed therefore.
Language to their Level
Speak in a simple language and encourage them to use the words they already
learned.
HOW TO DEVELOP THE SPEAKING SKILL?
5. Safe Environment
Do not correct your students all the time. Instead you can
repeat their answers with the correction.
Fun
Let them speak without stress. Plan enjoyable tasks to their
levels using gamification techniques.
HOW TO DEVELOP THE SPEAKING SKILL?
8. Spoken Interaction
• I can interact in a simple
way provided the other
person is prepared to
repeat or rephrase things
at a slower rate of speech
and help me formulate
what I’m trying to say.
Spoken Production
• I can use simple phrases
and sentences to describe
where I live and people I
know.
LEVELS IN SPOKEN INTERACTION AND SPOKEN PRODUCTION IN CEF
9. REFERENCE
The Importance of Teaching Listening and Speaking
Skills; TRABAJO FIN DE MÁSTER. CURSO: 2011 –
2012.