Definition Presentation
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•212 views
The document discusses the basics of definition, genus, and division as rhetorical devices. Definition is used to clarify terms and prevent misunderstanding. Genus establishes the classification of a topic to strengthen arguments. Division outlines the subcategories or species of a genus to help the audience understand the content. These devices should be used to clarify arguments, but not as stalling tactics or with irrelevant information.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
What is an Argument: A Foundation for ELA in the Common Core Era
An academic language development and oral language development interactive presentation on developing arguments.
Argumentative Writing
This document provides an overview of the key elements of an argumentative essay, including considering the audience, introducing the topic, stating the thesis, providing reasons and evidence to support the position, addressing counterarguments, and concluding by restating the argument. It discusses the importance of the hook, background information, and thesis statement in the introduction and specific elements like position, reasons, evidence, and rebuttal that are needed in the body. The conclusion should restate the argument and can include a prediction or warning. It also provides some potential references on argumentative writing.
Doable Debate in the ESL/EFL Classroom
This workshop invites educators to participate in and learn more about debates that can be adapted to their own home educational circumstances.
Argumentation Theory
Argumentation theory is the study of how conclusions can be reached through logical reasoning and includes the analysis of civil debate, conversation, and persuasion. It examines different types of arguments used in various contexts such as legal, scientific, mathematical, and political. The field has broadened over time from its philosophical origins to consider arguments beyond formal systems. Effective arguing requires understanding one's purpose, knowing the details of the argument, listening to others, and not arguing with those unwilling to provide good reasons for their beliefs.
Evaluating arguments lesson2
The document provides guidance on evaluating arguments, including defining what an argument is, identifying its key parts, and strategies for analyzing and assessing arguments. It discusses evaluating the types of evidence, claims, and support used; identifying logical fallacies, assumptions, and biases; and determining the completeness, validity, and credibility of an argument.
Argumentation
The document provides an overview of argumentation and the key components of constructing a strong argument. It discusses the importance of logos (facts and evidence), ethos (credibility), and pathos (appeals to emotion). Additionally, it outlines common types of reasoning, things to consider like acknowledging other viewpoints, and logical fallacies to avoid. The document emphasizes researching all sides of an issue thoroughly and being able to refute opposing arguments.
What is a debate
The document defines a debate as a contest where two teams present arguments to persuade one another on a given resolution, and notes classroom debates help develop skills like analytical thinking, public speaking, and teamwork. Key aspects of debates are outlined, including the roles of the affirmative and negative teams, the rebuttal process, preparation strategies, and evaluation criteria used by judges.
Identifying claims
This document discusses identifying explicit and implicit claims in arguments. It defines explicit claims as those directly stated using words like "because", while implicit claims refer to underlying assumptions and values. The document provides a framework for analyzing arguments by: 1) stating the thesis, 2) identifying explicit reasons and evidence for each, 3) determining implicit reasons and contextual evidence, and 4) evaluating the logic and validity. Identifying implicit assumptions is challenging but reveals the real issues and values underlying an argument.
Recommended
What is an Argument: A Foundation for ELA in the Common Core Era
An academic language development and oral language development interactive presentation on developing arguments.
Argumentative Writing
This document provides an overview of the key elements of an argumentative essay, including considering the audience, introducing the topic, stating the thesis, providing reasons and evidence to support the position, addressing counterarguments, and concluding by restating the argument. It discusses the importance of the hook, background information, and thesis statement in the introduction and specific elements like position, reasons, evidence, and rebuttal that are needed in the body. The conclusion should restate the argument and can include a prediction or warning. It also provides some potential references on argumentative writing.
Doable Debate in the ESL/EFL Classroom
This workshop invites educators to participate in and learn more about debates that can be adapted to their own home educational circumstances.
Argumentation Theory
Argumentation theory is the study of how conclusions can be reached through logical reasoning and includes the analysis of civil debate, conversation, and persuasion. It examines different types of arguments used in various contexts such as legal, scientific, mathematical, and political. The field has broadened over time from its philosophical origins to consider arguments beyond formal systems. Effective arguing requires understanding one's purpose, knowing the details of the argument, listening to others, and not arguing with those unwilling to provide good reasons for their beliefs.
Evaluating arguments lesson2
The document provides guidance on evaluating arguments, including defining what an argument is, identifying its key parts, and strategies for analyzing and assessing arguments. It discusses evaluating the types of evidence, claims, and support used; identifying logical fallacies, assumptions, and biases; and determining the completeness, validity, and credibility of an argument.
Argumentation
The document provides an overview of argumentation and the key components of constructing a strong argument. It discusses the importance of logos (facts and evidence), ethos (credibility), and pathos (appeals to emotion). Additionally, it outlines common types of reasoning, things to consider like acknowledging other viewpoints, and logical fallacies to avoid. The document emphasizes researching all sides of an issue thoroughly and being able to refute opposing arguments.
What is a debate
The document defines a debate as a contest where two teams present arguments to persuade one another on a given resolution, and notes classroom debates help develop skills like analytical thinking, public speaking, and teamwork. Key aspects of debates are outlined, including the roles of the affirmative and negative teams, the rebuttal process, preparation strategies, and evaluation criteria used by judges.
Identifying claims
This document discusses identifying explicit and implicit claims in arguments. It defines explicit claims as those directly stated using words like "because", while implicit claims refer to underlying assumptions and values. The document provides a framework for analyzing arguments by: 1) stating the thesis, 2) identifying explicit reasons and evidence for each, 3) determining implicit reasons and contextual evidence, and 4) evaluating the logic and validity. Identifying implicit assumptions is challenging but reveals the real issues and values underlying an argument.
Teaching debate skills
The document summarizes a presentation on incorporating debate into English language teaching. It discusses what debate is, the skills it helps develop, how to design a debate-focused syllabus, and tips for structuring classroom debates. Debate involves arguing for or against a resolution and helps improve students' critical thinking, research, public speaking and listening skills. The presentation provides examples of debate topics and structures for classroom debates, as well as suggestions for supporting arguments and developing counterarguments.
Argument and persuasion
Persuasive writing aims to convince readers to adopt a certain viewpoint using sound reasoning and evidence. It presents a claim supported by multiple reasons backed by facts, expert opinions, statistics, or personal observations. Strong arguments also address potential counterarguments in a fair manner before rebutting them to demonstrate that the writer has considered alternative perspectives. Effective persuasive essays follow a standard format that introduces the claim, discusses each supporting reason and evidence, addresses counterarguments, and concludes by restating the central claim.
Advanced 5 b
This document provides guidance on writing a persuasive essay. It explains that a persuasive essay attempts to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint using logical reasons and evidence. It stresses the importance of having a clear thesis statement and supporting it with facts, examples, and quotes from experts. It then lists several key steps to take when planning a persuasive essay, such as choosing a position, researching the topic thoroughly, outlining the structure, and supporting the thesis with evidence while also addressing alternative viewpoints. Finally, it discusses different types of evidence that can be used such as facts, statistics, quotes, and examples.
Evaluating philosophical claims and theories
This document outlines criteria for evaluating philosophical arguments, claims, and theories:
1. When evaluating an argument, consider whether the philosopher provides good reasons to support their conclusion, rather than simply agreeing or disagreeing with the conclusion.
2. An argument may be weak without proving the conclusion false - weak arguments do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion.
3. Philosophical evaluations should consider clarity, consistency, coherence, and comprehensiveness of concepts, logical contradictions, fit of elements, and breadth of phenomena explained.
4476819.pdf
This document provides an introduction to debate and building effective arguments. It defines key terms used in debate such as facts, opinions, evidence, claims, and affirmative and negative sides. It explains that debate involves arguing both sides of an issue using logic and research to persuade judges. The core of debate is refutation, where debaters make their own arguments and respond to the opposing team's arguments to prove their position is better supported.
Writing an argument
The document provides an overview of writing an argument. It defines an argument and explains that an argument seeks to convince a reader by appealing to reason, emotions, or ethics. It also discusses coming up with a claim, considering your audience and purpose, templates for arguing, organizing an argument by stating your claim and supporting it with evidence, and establishing your own credibility.
Argumentation 111312
The document provides an overview of argumentation and persuasion techniques for academic papers. It discusses developing a thesis, addressing opposing viewpoints, using logical reasoning and credible evidence to support claims, and avoiding logical fallacies. The document outlines plans for upcoming class meetings and assignments, and strategies for crafting persuasive arguments tailored to different audience types.
Argumentative Writing ppt - Grades 10-11 / Forms 4 - 5
Teaching argumentative writing can help develop students' critical thinking skills through inferences, arguments, facts and critical analysis. This powerpoint presentation provides: a definition for argumentative writing; examples of everyday arguments; elements of argumentative writing; ideas about how to organise an argumentative essay; practice prompts and much more!
Elements of persuasive or argument writing
The document provides guidance on writing a persuasive essay or paper. It explains that a persuasive essay attempts to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint using sound reasoning and evidence. It should introduce the topic and thesis, state facts of the case, prove the thesis with arguments, disprove opposing arguments, and conclude. The thesis usually appears at the end of the introduction as a one sentence summary. The essay should explain the topic, give supporting facts cited from sources, present facts building the strongest argument last, and conclude by restating why the audience should be persuaded. When planning, the writer should choose a position, analyze the audience, research the topic, and structure the essay.
Analyzing and evaluating arguments
This document discusses how to evaluate arguments. To evaluate an argument, you first analyze it by identifying the claim, or conclusion, the author is trying to persuade the reader of. You then identify the evidence or reasons the author provides to support the claim. Finally, you critically analyze the strength of the evidence and how well it actually supports the claim. A strong, valid argument will have evidence that is truthful and clearly supports its claim.
How to write a debate outline
1) The document provides guidance on how to write an effective debate outline, including identifying the debate format, doing thorough research, following outlining principles, structuring the case and potential rebuttals, and avoiding logical fallacies.
2) It recommends identifying the debate format which determines the structure, doing research to find solid evidence for arguments and potential counterarguments, and outlining the case with a strong introduction, body, and conclusion.
3) The document also cautions about logical fallacies to avoid such as straw man arguments, slippery slopes, ad hominem attacks, and relying on anecdotes instead of evidence.
Persuasive writing ii
The document provides instructions for writing a 5-paragraph persuasive essay, including guidelines for each paragraph. It discusses the writing process, which begins with prewriting like brainstorming topics, researching the chosen topic, drafting the body paragraphs first, and then the introduction and conclusion. It provides outlines for the introductory, body, and concluding paragraphs and suggests including a main idea, reasons supported by evidence, and transitional sentences between paragraphs. The document also offers tips for revision, proofreading, and beginning the first draft.
Peel philosophy essay
This document provides a structure for planning philosophy essays using the P.E.E.L. method. P.E.E.L. stands for Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link. The essay should introduce the thesis and then present 3 main points that support the thesis with evidence from philosophers, the writer's explanation and analysis, and how the point links to answering the question. Counterarguments should also be addressed. The conclusion restates how the argument structure answers the title question. Signposts and connective words are recommended to improve coherence and clarity. Evaluation skills can be refined by assessing arguments for validity, truth, clarity, consistency, and coherence.
How to write a philosophy essay
This document provides guidance on how to write a philosophy essay. It discusses establishing a position or thesis in relation to the essay question, developing an argument to support that thesis over the body of the essay using evidence from philosophers, and restating the main argument in the conclusion. Key tips include carefully selecting supporting arguments, using signposts to guide the reader, and evaluating arguments based on their clarity, consistency, coherence and comprehensiveness. The document also provides an example introduction and recommends committing introductory statements to memory.
Ge117 week five statements and using evidence
This document provides an overview and review of thesis statements and using evidence to support claims in academic writing. It discusses the key elements of a strong thesis statement, including having a specific, narrow topic and an indication of the author's stance. Common mistakes to avoid, such as writing a factual statement or announcement, are outlined. The document also covers different types of evidence that can strengthen arguments, such as examples, facts, quotations and expert opinions. Characteristics of effective evidence like being relevant, specific, adequate and accurate are described. Students are assigned a revision task and homework to draft an introduction with thesis and three body paragraphs with different types of supporting evidence.
Summary of debate
This document provides an overview of debating formats and guidelines. It discusses the different types of debates including parliamentary and non-parliamentary. Debates are judged based on matter, manner, and method. The roles of speakers in various debate formats are outlined. Guidelines are provided on developing arguments, rebuttals, and responding to points of information. Suggestions are also given for coaches to help debaters understand motions and practice debates.
The Art of Debating?
This document provides an overview of debating skills. It discusses what debating is, the benefits of debating, and basic debating skills. The key points covered are:
- Debating is a structured argument where two sides alternately argue for and against a contention on a topic. It allows opposing views to be discussed without insults.
- Benefits of debating include improving speaking skills and gaining experience developing convincing arguments while considering multiple perspectives.
- Basic debating skills include effective style, pace, tone, volume, clarity, use of notes, understanding other positions, and amicably resolving debates. Strategies like preparing arguments, rebuttals, and conceding small points are also discussed
Formal Debate
This document provides instructions for participating in a debate. It outlines the basic steps, which are to receive a debate topic, define the topic if needed, write an argument within the time limit, present the argument, balance making your own points and rebutting opponents', follow the three rules of rebuttal by offering evidence, attacking important parts of the opponents' argument, and avoiding personal attacks. It also notes that debates are usually judged on matter, manner, and method, including the amount and relevancy of evidence, presentation skills, teamwork, and individual skills.
Chapter 4 Revised
The document discusses identifying implied main ideas in texts. It explains that an implied main idea is suggested rather than clearly stated, and must be inferred by the reader based on supporting details. To find an implied main idea, the reader should ask themselves what overall point the author is trying to make about the topic. Once an implied main idea is inferred, the reader should check that most or all details in the text support that main idea.
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
This is a pilot presentation for a multi-campus ESL learning opportunity allowing English learners to engage in higher level discussions in a structured manner.
Effective presentation strategies
The document discusses effective strategies for technical report writing and presentations. It covers defining the purpose, analyzing the audience, organizing the content into an introduction, main body and conclusion with clear transitions. Additional tips include preparing an outline, using visual aids, understanding delivery styles, handling questions, and using effective vocal techniques like volume, pace and pronunciation. The overall focus is on planning an effective presentation through audience analysis, clear organization and structure, and strong delivery skills.
defining purpose of presentation
The document contains identifying information about Dhanraj Vaghela including his name, branch of study, semester, and enrollment number. It discusses how knowing the purpose of an activity, such as a presentation, helps the presenter plan and prepare by being clear on the reason for doing it. The main purpose of any presentation is to get the message across to the listener, and understanding the local presentation involves having complete knowledge about the audience and location.
More Related Content
What's hot
Teaching debate skills
The document summarizes a presentation on incorporating debate into English language teaching. It discusses what debate is, the skills it helps develop, how to design a debate-focused syllabus, and tips for structuring classroom debates. Debate involves arguing for or against a resolution and helps improve students' critical thinking, research, public speaking and listening skills. The presentation provides examples of debate topics and structures for classroom debates, as well as suggestions for supporting arguments and developing counterarguments.
Argument and persuasion
Persuasive writing aims to convince readers to adopt a certain viewpoint using sound reasoning and evidence. It presents a claim supported by multiple reasons backed by facts, expert opinions, statistics, or personal observations. Strong arguments also address potential counterarguments in a fair manner before rebutting them to demonstrate that the writer has considered alternative perspectives. Effective persuasive essays follow a standard format that introduces the claim, discusses each supporting reason and evidence, addresses counterarguments, and concludes by restating the central claim.
Advanced 5 b
This document provides guidance on writing a persuasive essay. It explains that a persuasive essay attempts to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint using logical reasons and evidence. It stresses the importance of having a clear thesis statement and supporting it with facts, examples, and quotes from experts. It then lists several key steps to take when planning a persuasive essay, such as choosing a position, researching the topic thoroughly, outlining the structure, and supporting the thesis with evidence while also addressing alternative viewpoints. Finally, it discusses different types of evidence that can be used such as facts, statistics, quotes, and examples.
Evaluating philosophical claims and theories
This document outlines criteria for evaluating philosophical arguments, claims, and theories:
1. When evaluating an argument, consider whether the philosopher provides good reasons to support their conclusion, rather than simply agreeing or disagreeing with the conclusion.
2. An argument may be weak without proving the conclusion false - weak arguments do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion.
3. Philosophical evaluations should consider clarity, consistency, coherence, and comprehensiveness of concepts, logical contradictions, fit of elements, and breadth of phenomena explained.
4476819.pdf
This document provides an introduction to debate and building effective arguments. It defines key terms used in debate such as facts, opinions, evidence, claims, and affirmative and negative sides. It explains that debate involves arguing both sides of an issue using logic and research to persuade judges. The core of debate is refutation, where debaters make their own arguments and respond to the opposing team's arguments to prove their position is better supported.
Writing an argument
The document provides an overview of writing an argument. It defines an argument and explains that an argument seeks to convince a reader by appealing to reason, emotions, or ethics. It also discusses coming up with a claim, considering your audience and purpose, templates for arguing, organizing an argument by stating your claim and supporting it with evidence, and establishing your own credibility.
Argumentation 111312
The document provides an overview of argumentation and persuasion techniques for academic papers. It discusses developing a thesis, addressing opposing viewpoints, using logical reasoning and credible evidence to support claims, and avoiding logical fallacies. The document outlines plans for upcoming class meetings and assignments, and strategies for crafting persuasive arguments tailored to different audience types.
Argumentative Writing ppt - Grades 10-11 / Forms 4 - 5
Teaching argumentative writing can help develop students' critical thinking skills through inferences, arguments, facts and critical analysis. This powerpoint presentation provides: a definition for argumentative writing; examples of everyday arguments; elements of argumentative writing; ideas about how to organise an argumentative essay; practice prompts and much more!
Elements of persuasive or argument writing
The document provides guidance on writing a persuasive essay or paper. It explains that a persuasive essay attempts to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint using sound reasoning and evidence. It should introduce the topic and thesis, state facts of the case, prove the thesis with arguments, disprove opposing arguments, and conclude. The thesis usually appears at the end of the introduction as a one sentence summary. The essay should explain the topic, give supporting facts cited from sources, present facts building the strongest argument last, and conclude by restating why the audience should be persuaded. When planning, the writer should choose a position, analyze the audience, research the topic, and structure the essay.
Analyzing and evaluating arguments
This document discusses how to evaluate arguments. To evaluate an argument, you first analyze it by identifying the claim, or conclusion, the author is trying to persuade the reader of. You then identify the evidence or reasons the author provides to support the claim. Finally, you critically analyze the strength of the evidence and how well it actually supports the claim. A strong, valid argument will have evidence that is truthful and clearly supports its claim.
How to write a debate outline
1) The document provides guidance on how to write an effective debate outline, including identifying the debate format, doing thorough research, following outlining principles, structuring the case and potential rebuttals, and avoiding logical fallacies.
2) It recommends identifying the debate format which determines the structure, doing research to find solid evidence for arguments and potential counterarguments, and outlining the case with a strong introduction, body, and conclusion.
3) The document also cautions about logical fallacies to avoid such as straw man arguments, slippery slopes, ad hominem attacks, and relying on anecdotes instead of evidence.
Persuasive writing ii
The document provides instructions for writing a 5-paragraph persuasive essay, including guidelines for each paragraph. It discusses the writing process, which begins with prewriting like brainstorming topics, researching the chosen topic, drafting the body paragraphs first, and then the introduction and conclusion. It provides outlines for the introductory, body, and concluding paragraphs and suggests including a main idea, reasons supported by evidence, and transitional sentences between paragraphs. The document also offers tips for revision, proofreading, and beginning the first draft.
Peel philosophy essay
This document provides a structure for planning philosophy essays using the P.E.E.L. method. P.E.E.L. stands for Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link. The essay should introduce the thesis and then present 3 main points that support the thesis with evidence from philosophers, the writer's explanation and analysis, and how the point links to answering the question. Counterarguments should also be addressed. The conclusion restates how the argument structure answers the title question. Signposts and connective words are recommended to improve coherence and clarity. Evaluation skills can be refined by assessing arguments for validity, truth, clarity, consistency, and coherence.
How to write a philosophy essay
This document provides guidance on how to write a philosophy essay. It discusses establishing a position or thesis in relation to the essay question, developing an argument to support that thesis over the body of the essay using evidence from philosophers, and restating the main argument in the conclusion. Key tips include carefully selecting supporting arguments, using signposts to guide the reader, and evaluating arguments based on their clarity, consistency, coherence and comprehensiveness. The document also provides an example introduction and recommends committing introductory statements to memory.
Ge117 week five statements and using evidence
This document provides an overview and review of thesis statements and using evidence to support claims in academic writing. It discusses the key elements of a strong thesis statement, including having a specific, narrow topic and an indication of the author's stance. Common mistakes to avoid, such as writing a factual statement or announcement, are outlined. The document also covers different types of evidence that can strengthen arguments, such as examples, facts, quotations and expert opinions. Characteristics of effective evidence like being relevant, specific, adequate and accurate are described. Students are assigned a revision task and homework to draft an introduction with thesis and three body paragraphs with different types of supporting evidence.
Summary of debate
This document provides an overview of debating formats and guidelines. It discusses the different types of debates including parliamentary and non-parliamentary. Debates are judged based on matter, manner, and method. The roles of speakers in various debate formats are outlined. Guidelines are provided on developing arguments, rebuttals, and responding to points of information. Suggestions are also given for coaches to help debaters understand motions and practice debates.
The Art of Debating?
This document provides an overview of debating skills. It discusses what debating is, the benefits of debating, and basic debating skills. The key points covered are:
- Debating is a structured argument where two sides alternately argue for and against a contention on a topic. It allows opposing views to be discussed without insults.
- Benefits of debating include improving speaking skills and gaining experience developing convincing arguments while considering multiple perspectives.
- Basic debating skills include effective style, pace, tone, volume, clarity, use of notes, understanding other positions, and amicably resolving debates. Strategies like preparing arguments, rebuttals, and conceding small points are also discussed
Formal Debate
This document provides instructions for participating in a debate. It outlines the basic steps, which are to receive a debate topic, define the topic if needed, write an argument within the time limit, present the argument, balance making your own points and rebutting opponents', follow the three rules of rebuttal by offering evidence, attacking important parts of the opponents' argument, and avoiding personal attacks. It also notes that debates are usually judged on matter, manner, and method, including the amount and relevancy of evidence, presentation skills, teamwork, and individual skills.
Chapter 4 Revised
The document discusses identifying implied main ideas in texts. It explains that an implied main idea is suggested rather than clearly stated, and must be inferred by the reader based on supporting details. To find an implied main idea, the reader should ask themselves what overall point the author is trying to make about the topic. Once an implied main idea is inferred, the reader should check that most or all details in the text support that main idea.
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
This is a pilot presentation for a multi-campus ESL learning opportunity allowing English learners to engage in higher level discussions in a structured manner.
What's hot (20)
Argumentative Writing ppt - Grades 10-11 / Forms 4 - 5
Argumentative Writing ppt - Grades 10-11 / Forms 4 - 5
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
Viewers also liked
Effective presentation strategies
The document discusses effective strategies for technical report writing and presentations. It covers defining the purpose, analyzing the audience, organizing the content into an introduction, main body and conclusion with clear transitions. Additional tips include preparing an outline, using visual aids, understanding delivery styles, handling questions, and using effective vocal techniques like volume, pace and pronunciation. The overall focus is on planning an effective presentation through audience analysis, clear organization and structure, and strong delivery skills.
defining purpose of presentation
The document contains identifying information about Dhanraj Vaghela including his name, branch of study, semester, and enrollment number. It discusses how knowing the purpose of an activity, such as a presentation, helps the presenter plan and prepare by being clear on the reason for doing it. The main purpose of any presentation is to get the message across to the listener, and understanding the local presentation involves having complete knowledge about the audience and location.
Presentation Skills
The document provides tips for effective presentations, including starting strongly with a story, question, or statistic; focusing on the audience; speaking clearly; making eye contact; and practicing. It also includes a self-assessment test for public speaking skills that addresses issues like nervousness, preparation, and engagement with the audience. The document emphasizes that practice is key to becoming a good speaker.
Effective presentation strategies
This document provides strategies and techniques for effective presentations. It discusses organizing a presentation into an introduction, main body, and conclusion. It also covers four modes of delivery: extemporaneous, manuscript, impromptu, and memorization. Additionally, it summarizes various non-verbal communication aspects like kinesics, proxemics, paralinguistics, and chronemics that presenters should be aware of to improve their delivery.
Types of Essay Items
Source: Assessment of learning 1
Author: Yonardo A. Gabuyo
(Note: Download first the file to view the full slides.)
Effective presentation strategies i
This document provides guidance on how to effectively structure and deliver an oral presentation. It discusses defining the topic and purpose, analyzing the audience, organizing the content into an introduction, main body, and conclusion, and using visual aids. The main body can be organized chronologically, categorically, through a cause-and-effect structure, or with a problem-solution framework. Introductions should capture attention and preview the content, while conclusions should summarize key points and end on a positive note.
Importance of TECHNICAL report WRITING
The importance of technical writing can be seen in a variety of applications, both in consumer products as well as the industrial environment
Types Of Essay
There are several types of essays including descriptive, definition, narrative, compare and contrast, persuasive, and argumentative. Descriptive essays provide vivid details to help readers visualize what is being described. Definition essays explain what a term means using facts and examples. Narrative essays tell a story from a subjective point of view using first-person perspective. Compare and contrast essays examine relationships between two or more topics. Persuasive essays try to convince readers of a point of view using strong supporting evidence. Argumentative essays address controversial issues by presenting a claim and supporting reasons while acknowledging other views.
Essay writing 5th types of essay
This document defines and provides examples of seven common types of essays: descriptive, narrative, cause and effect, compare and contrast, process, expository, and persuasive/argumentative. A descriptive essay provides sensory details about a person, place, or thing. A narrative essay tells a story, often from a first-person perspective. A cause and effect essay examines how various factors influence an outcome or event. A compare and contrast essay analyzes the similarities and differences between two or more subjects. A process essay outlines the steps to complete a task or achieve a goal. An expository essay explains or informs on a topic. A persuasive essay aims to convince the reader of a particular opinion or argument.
The purpose of power point
The document provides tips for creating effective PowerPoint presentations. It recommends separating the presentation into three documents: audience support, speaker support, and handouts. The audience support document illustrates the message and engages the audience, while the speaker support contains private notes to prompt the presentation. Effective presentations should be creative and avoid simply listing bullet points that bore both the presenter and audience.
Presentation Skills
The document provides guidance on developing effective presentation skills. It covers preparing a presentation by understanding the audience, structuring the content logically, and using visual aids. It also discusses preparing oneself through confidence, appearance, voice control, and reducing tension. When delivering the presentation, the document advises controlling nerves, speaking confidently, and closing effectively. It concludes by offering tips on judging the audience's mood and handling questions.
Effective presentation skills
The document provides guidance on making effective presentations. It outlines 4 basic steps: 1) Formulate a strategy tailored to the audience; 2) Develop a clear structure that answers key questions; 3) Engage the audience with an enthusiastic presentation style using techniques like stories and humor; 4) Confidently handle questions by anticipating objections and linking responses to your main points. Each step includes tips, such as researching thoroughly, using an outline, maintaining eye contact, and practicing responses to difficult questions. The overall message is that an effective presentation requires both well-organized content and a style that captures audience interest and involvement.
Effective presentation skills
For an effective presentation you need to concentrate on three key areas
such as
• Content
• Design
• Delivery
Effective presentation skills
this slide share will be helpful for the students who are at the initial stages and have ambiguities that how can they give effective presentation...
Viewers also liked (14)
Similar to Definition Presentation
Lecture on writing argumentative essays ppt
The document provides guidance on writing argumentative essays. It discusses choosing a debatable topic, developing a clear thesis statement, addressing counterarguments, and organizing the essay. The key points are:
- Choose a topic that allows for reasonable arguments on both sides rather than being a statement of fact. A good thesis directly answers the assignment question with a clear position and forecast of evidence.
- Anticipate opposing views and address them in the essay to demonstrate a well-rounded understanding and weaken those counterarguments.
- The essay should be organized logically, either by refuting counterarguments before stating the thesis, or presenting the thesis and evidence first before addressing objections.
How to debate
This document provides instructions on how to debate effectively. It discusses what a debate is, why people debate, and basic debating skills. The skills covered include style, speed, tone, volume, clarity, use of notes, eye contact, content, case structure, and rebuttal techniques. The document emphasizes the importance of presenting arguments in a clear, logical, and evidence-based manner while also engaging with the audience. Debates involve structuring an argument, supporting various positions, and systematically addressing opposing views.
The toulmin modelA six-part model of presenting and critiquing.docx
The toulmin model
A six-part model of presenting and critiquing evidence
The toulmin model
Stephen toulmin created this model to help all of understand the logic of everyday arguments
He presumed that no argument was indisputable
He challenged us to understand the importance of recognizing opposing claims
The toulmin model
Claim
Grounds
Warrant
Backing
Qualifier
rebuttal
The claim
What I want you to believe, accept or do
the policy I want you to adopt
The program that works best
The grounds
The evidence I use to bolster my claim
Can be any of the examples from the writing arguments book (see pages 74-77)
The stronger your evidence, the stronger your claim
The warrant
Sometimes stated, sometimes implicit
the values, beliefs or principles I need you to accept in order for my claim to remain valid
The warrant is NOT evidence
The backing
Supports the warrant
Requires evidence
You’re perhaps moving toward persuasion here
The qualifier
How forceful do you need to be to convince people to move to your side?
Words such as “very likely” or “probably” are allies to you here
The rebuttal
Your recognition that your argument is not perfect
Acknowledgement of other opinions, proposals, etc.
Let’s try it out
Here is my claim: public colleges and universities should be free to all students
public colleges and universities should be free to all students
What are my grounds?
What types of evidence should I consider?
public colleges and universities should be free to all students
Let’s discuss the warrants
For my claim to remain valid, what American beliefs, values, etc. might come into play?
public colleges and universities should be free to all students
We need backing for the warrants
How are you going to support those warrants?
public colleges and universities should be free to all students
What qualifiers are in play?
How much resistance do I expect?
public colleges and universities should be free to all students
In acknowledging the rebuttal, I might say…
A cartoon and the toulmin model
Your third paper (due Aug. 1)
In a 4-6 page paper, you are going to use the toulmin model to again attempt to validate how you answered the “burqa and niqab” question
You do not need to do additional research for this paper
Your third paper (due aug. 1)
you are going to take apart your second paper (which is due next week) and employ the steps of the toulmin model
you are going to make a kind-of appeal to convince your audience that the burqa and niqab should/shouldn’t be banned
Pages 64-70 in your writing arguments book provide you a model to follow; I expect you to structure your paper like this
Your third paper (due aug. 1)
Remember, you’re looking at a roughly 4-6 page paper
I don’t need a title page
I do need a works cited page (using appropriate apa style; this page does Not count toward your 4-6 pages)
Your oral presentation (AUG. 1)
You also will do a roughly 4-minute oral presentation on aug. 1, when you will discuss how y ...
How to debate
Debating involves a structured argument between two sides on a topic. Each side is given a set time to speak for or against the issue. The goal is to improve speaking skills and experience in developing convincing arguments. Basic debating skills include style, speed, tone, volume, and clarity of expression. A good debate includes introducing the argument, building the case with evidence, and rebutting the opposing side's arguments.
Discussion tutorial
This document provides guidance and examples for students on how to effectively respond to discussion questions in an online sociology class. It begins by presenting a sample discussion question and outlines how students should prepare their response. It then shares a rubric for grading responses and identifies the category that gives students the most trouble. The document cautions students against providing mere opinions and advocates for supporting any conclusions or judgments with evidence. It shows examples of excellent student responses that provide in-depth analysis using sociological concepts to avoid simplistic opinions. Students are encouraged to devote significant effort to discussion questions, as they are worth a substantial portion of the class grade.
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
The document provides an overview of basic debating skills. It defines what a debate is, the roles of different speakers, how to structure arguments and rebuttals, and tips for effective delivery. A debate involves presenting structured speeches on opposing sides of an issue to determine the stronger argument. Each speaker has a designated role, such as introducing the topic or rebutting the other side's arguments. Debaters are scored on the substance of their arguments, how they organize their presentation, and their public speaking mannerisms. The goal is a logical, well-structured exchange of ideas, not an undisciplined shouting match.
Q4-EAPP.pptx
This document provides guidance on writing a position paper. It explains that a position paper presents an arguable opinion on an issue and aims to convince the audience that the opinion is valid. It stresses the importance of addressing all sides of the issue, supporting arguments with evidence, and considering the audience. The document outlines steps for choosing a topic, researching both sides, selecting a position, and determining an introduction, body, and conclusion structure for the paper.
Scaffolding Persuasive Writing
The document outlines the steps for persuasive writing:
1. Establish a situation by introducing the topic and your position on the topic.
2. Include pertinent evidence from research to support your position.
3. Create an organizing structure such as numbered paragraphs to develop your argument in a logical way.
4. Provide a sense of closure by restating your position and the main points that support it.
Joint discussion paper
The document outlines an assignment for students to collaborate in groups to research and write a paper on a contentious issue. Students will be divided into groups to research arguments for and against a provided question. Each student will be responsible for a section of the paper or an editing role. The paper will include an introduction, arguments in favor, arguments against, and a conclusion. Guidelines are provided for writing each section and fulfilling the different roles. Possible contentious issues that could be researched are also listed.
Arguments
This document provides guidance on building an argument in an essay. It discusses what an argument is, the importance of reading opposing arguments, thinking critically about a topic, gathering evidence to support your claims, organizing your thoughts, and structuring an argument in an essay. The document emphasizes stating your thesis early, backing it up with evidence, citing sources, addressing counterarguments, and concluding by restating your argument. Overall, the document offers a comprehensive overview of how to construct an effective academic argument in an essay.
Argumentative lesson plans
This lesson plan teaches high school students how to select evidence from texts to support an argument in an essay. Over three class periods, students will: 1) analyze model examples of selecting evidence, 2) practice the strategy in small groups, and 3) independently apply it to their own writing. The goal is for students to choose several interconnected pieces of evidence that adequately support their argument, rather than forming an argument without considering available evidence.
Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docx
This document provides instructions for students to write a classical argument paper on an approved topic. It outlines the key elements of a classical argument, including: introducing the issue and opposing positions, presenting reasons and evidence to support the student's position, anticipating and refuting counterarguments, and concluding by emphasizing the importance of the issue. Students must write a minimum 1,200-1,500 word paper using at least 5 credible sources to both support their argument and refute opposing positions. The paper should follow standard argumentative structure and formatting guidelines provided.
EAPP-Position-Paper.pptx
The document provides guidance on how to write an effective position paper by outlining the structure and elements to include. A position paper should present an arguable stance on an issue, address counterarguments, and support the writer's position with evidence. The document advises selecting a narrow topic of interest, researching both sides, and crafting an introduction that states the thesis followed by body paragraphs addressing arguments and counterarguments.
Research and discussion paper
- The document outlines an assignment for students to research a contentious question in groups. They will analyze arguments for and against the question, write a paper presenting each side and reaching a conclusion.
- The class will be divided into groups that will each research a different question. Individual roles within each group include the main writer for each section, an editor-in-chief, a data editor, and a summarizing editor.
- The paper will include an introduction providing context, separate sections outlining arguments for and against, and a conclusion comparing the evidence and stating which position is stronger. Guidelines are provided for writing each section.
Resume personal statementWe must improve conditions for specia.docx
Resume personal statement
We must improve conditions for special needs students in Saudi Arabia. I hope to be able to bridge the gap between the traditional Saudi method of education, and the progressive skills and strategies I have learned during my study.
work and experience
· Work at Aljouf University from 2010 until present as a faculty member
qualifications and certificates
· Health awareness program (program on first aid) 2009
· Certificate of attendance and well behaviour from King Faisal University
· Computer course in the office works for three months 2009
· Certificate of attendance and discussion in the seminar for the National Research center for giftedness and creativity
· Certificate of attendance the training course entitled enter Pattern to identify the gifted students in the early years
· Certificate of merit for critical thinking From ELS 2012
· Certificate of appreciation and valuable support to the international women's day of the Saudi student club March 2015
· Certificate of appreciation and valuable support to the Light the night of the of the Saudi student club February 2015
· Certificate of attendance the Understanding the Importance of Collaboration When Building Quality Alliances September of 2016
· Certificate of attendance the Thompson Centre Autism Conference September 2016
· Certificate for attendance the Understanding Cognitive Flexibility October of 2016
· Certificate of attendance the Who, What, When of Leadership November of 2016
· Certificate of attendance the Andragogy in the Classroom December of 2016
· Certificate of attendance the Understanding Today's Modern World: The Effects on Leadership February of 2017
· Certificate of attendance the Art of Leadership: Problem Solving & Decision-Making Skills April of 2017
· Certificate of attendance the When "Things" Go Wrong in Leadership August of 2017
· “Concept Mapping and the Research Process” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Symposium (SOTL) Symposium, (Davis, D.J., Aljafari, R., Alqahtani, A., Alroeshedy, W., Alwazzan, A., Cao, Y., Marshall, L.H., Luebbert, C., Wang, Z., & Fricke, V.), Paul C. Reinert, S.J. Center for Transformative Teaching and Learning, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO
· Certificate of attendance the Development & Engagement of Integrated Strategies December of 2017
· Certificate of attendance the Advanced Collective Leadership: How to Develop Innovative Plans of Action February of 2018
· Certificate of attendance he CEC 2018 Annual Convention & Expo
· Certificate of attendance the Developing quality Training Programs May of 2018
· “The Experiences of Saudi Students at SLU” (Almalki, S., Alnoim, M., Aljafari, R., & Alwazzan, A.) Atlas Week Annual 17th Conference, Saint Louis University St. Louis, MO, United States of America 04/2018
· Certificate of attendance the Wrights Special Education Law and Advocacy Seminareducation
· Bachelor's degree from King Faisal University 2009 in special education with GPA 4.5 out ...
Critical Analysis Essay Example
This document provides a critical analysis of an essay on extending the school day. The summary identifies several weaknesses in the original essay, including a lack of unity and coherence between paragraphs, ineffective sentences with errors like fragments and run-on sentences, improper word choice, and a conclusion that fails to summarize and instead adds another point. The analysis then provides specific examples and explanations of these weaknesses to support its critique of the essay's effectiveness.
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay
PROMPT: Is putting yourself first a good approach to life?
FAQ
· How should I get started?
· Have the Personal Responsibility and Critical Thinking Rubrics open in front of you. Your grade will be assessed according to these two rubrics. Scroll down for these rubrics.
· Some questions to ask yourself as you are brainstorming: What does "putting yourself first" mean as you see it? What are the consequences of living this way? How would you describe the opposite of "putting yourself first"? If you had to choose between them, which way of life is better? Do you have to choose between them? If you disagree with your friend who thinks life is about putting oneself first as much as possible whenever possible, how would you persuade your friend that life is not a selfish or self-indulgent pursuit? How do you justify that your own actions are altruistic, and to what end do you pursue acts in the interest of others? Do you do so with the same passion as you do endeavors that fulfill a want or a need in your own life? Once you have entertained the above questions, carve out a thesis statement that states clearly whether or not "put yourself first" is a good approach to life and why.
· Early in your essay, describe how you understand "putting yourself first". It's important to define how you view this way of life before either advocating for it or rejecting it.
· Look up any information that you may need to check your biases. Suppose you intend to argue that rich people get ahead because they do not donate to charity. You might first explore studies to verify whether or not this is true. Who gives more to charity, the rich or the poor?
Have the facts.
· Argue for your thesis throughout your essay.
· Address objections to your position.
· How should this essay relate to Chapter 2?
· When writing this essay, you are not required to discuss the theories of meaning from Chapter 2 unless you find them relevant to "put yourself first". Focus the entirety of your essay on "put yourself first" and direct alternatives to this way of life as you draw upon the "big picture" from Chapter 2, that is the consequences of having a theory of meaning at all.
· In drafting this essay, I recommend that you also read section 8-3 of The Big Questions and the 1000 Word Philosophy link that I have posted below. Scroll, scroll.
· How many sources do I need to cite?
· You
must site some sources. See the Evidence component of the Critical Thinking Rubric. Though there is no minimum number of cited sources beyond our textbook, sometimes you need to refer to other source material in making your argument. Whenever you discuss content that should be backed up with a source, be sure to incorporate accurate sources and cite them.
· What format and style of citation should I use?
Use MLA. Academic philosophers use Chicago Manual. If you continue studies in philosophy, you will learn Chicago Manual; however, fo.
I am an athlete and I think because I had a training for seven ye.docx
I am an athlete and I think because I had a training for seven years in cricket and skating. Moreover, I do training rigorously every day. And I have sportsman spirit. I received many awards and recognition, when I was a part of my District Sports Club. This will allow me to become good athlete.
Being an athlete, I love playing cricket and skating. And to support my claim I would like to elaborate by saying when I was pursing my bachelors our university was organizing cricket tournament and in that tournament I scored highest runs and took maximum wickets so as a result I was awarded “man of the series” title. In addition, I am also good at skating as I have won gold medal at district level. And as past time activity I used to train students at primary school.
I believe being athlete I will surely motivate my team members such as Firstly, to be in disciple by following strict exercise and proper diet schedule, Secondly, to have focus and vision so that team can achieve a goal, Thirdly, to have a drive so that team can work hard every day and Lastly, maintain proper physical fitness because it helps to keep body in tone and being close to nature it always helps to get refreshed and re-energised.
Note:
Complete the assignment in word file in APA format.
Include in-text citation were possible.
Include title, reference in project.
This is just raw data, need to frame in complex structure.
1. In introduction para include the main claim (Athlete).
2. In Second para include sub claim that is (cricket and skating)
And provide relevant evidence and reason to support the claim.
3. In Third para how your strength will help your team members.
4. End with a good conclusion.
MGMT 542: Argument and Communication for International Business
Foundations Week
This class is 2.5 hours long.
Instructor: Alisa Gordaneer
Class 2
Attendance
1
Foundations Week – Day 2 Topics
• More about argument:
counter-argument
• Characteristics of weak arguments
• Preparing for Assignment 2
Critical thinking and
assignment analysis
• Organizing your argument:
pyramid and paragraphing
• Topic sentences and evidence sentences
Image source: http://www.coachingcompany.co.za/coaching_outcomes.php
Introduction to argument
Claims and evidence
Critical Thinking
Argument and logic
Using quotations
Writing practice exercises
Looking ahead: TAPS for Assignment 4
2
Counter-argument
Discuss with your team:
What is counter-argument?
Why is it used?
Counter argument
Argument
Counter Argument
Counter argument
Demonstrates you have considered another point of view
Rebuttal of the counter-argument strengthens your main argument
On one level: the argument can look solid
Image source: http://www.fotopedia.com/items/flickr-3434373431
6
Different Perspective: can show its weaknesses
Image source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/xlibber/7825817890/
7
What makes an argument weak?
Image source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/com.
How to use this template To use this template, replace the inst.docx
How to use this template:
To use this template, replace the instructions written in italic font with your own discussion text. Be sure to proofread your work and check it for completeness and accuracy. Delete any extra text/instructions/references that do not apply to your post. Then, copy your work and paste it into the discussion window in class.Week 1, Discussion 1: Initial Post
My personal communication style is…(Here, you should talk about the “reflect” part of the prompt. You can share your personal verbal style, writing style, and any concerns you have about your ability to develop a truly academic argument in this class.)
I have learned that an academic argument is…(Here, you should describe an academic argument in your own words, based upon the items you read in preparation for this discussion. Remember to describe the four basic elements of an argument.)
A recent argument that I experienced was…(Or, if you do not wish to outline an argument from your personal experience, describe the argument presented in the sample paper. Be sure to identify the four basic elements of the argument, whether analyzing one from your experience or the student paper.)
After reading the course materials, I have questions about…(Be sure to clearly state any questions or confusion you have regarding rhetoric, argument, or styles of argument. Your classmates can help you find the answers throughout the week.)
References
(If you reference the textbook, instructor guidance, or handout – which you should – be sure to cite them in-text and add the references to the end of your post. We are learning to master APA style in this class and this is a perfect opportunity to begin your practice. Remember: only items cited in-text should be listed as a reference. For more information: https://awc.ashford.edu/cd-in-text-citation-guide.html & https://awc.ashford.edu/cd-apa-reference-models.html)
Drown, E., & Sole, K. (2013). Writing college research papers (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Flag Burning. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://cdmsmedia.bridgepointeducation.com/MediaService/MediaService.svc/constellation/book/AUWC.12.4/%7Bhandouts%7Da.8_sample_argument_paper.pdf
Garten, A. (n.d.). ENG122 week 1 Instructor guidance [Course materials].
Garten, A., & Wilson, J. (2014). An Introduction to Argument [PDF]. College of Liberal Arts, Ashford University, San Diego, CA.
ENG122: Composition II
An Introduction to Argument
P a g e | 1
English 122: Composition II
An Introduction to Argument
Argument and Rhetoric
An argument can take many forms. An academic argument, at its root, a method for
communicating a singular position with evidence, logic, and persuasion. There are essential
elements to all valid arguments, though they may take different forms.
1. Claim
2. Evidence
3. Counterargument
4. Rebuttal
A successful argument depends upon the delicate balance
between these elements. Imagine a teeter-totter at the
playground. The ...
Week 3 Humanistic TheoriesThe good life is a process, not a sta.docx
Week 3: Humanistic Theories
The good life is a process, not a state of being. It is a direction, not a destination.
—Carl Rogers
Humanistic theories can empower clients to find meaning within their lives. While people subjectively consider their insights, emotions, and actions, how might you objectively employ interventions in both a genuine and approachable manner? Being a humanistic/existential counselor requires that you enter into the phenomenological world of your clients, which means that you gain a true understanding of the way they have perceived the experiences in their lives. By demonstrating this understanding, you provide genuine empathy. Feelings of empathy can evoke an environment where mutual trust is understood, thus allowing you to partner with clients in their journeys to acquire a deeper understanding of themselves.
This week, you will review person-centered theory, observe the application of this approach by watching a media demonstration, and apply the person-centered approach to one of the case studies used in this course.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
· Identify theorists, timeframes, and major constructs of individual theories
· Analyze techniques/interventions associated with individual theories
· Evaluate theories in relation to cases
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Hazler, R. (2016). Person-centered theory. In D. Capuzzi & M. D. Stauffer (Eds.), Counseling and psychotherapy: Theories and interventions (6th ed., pp. 169–194). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Document: Psychoanalytic Case Conceptualization Example (Word document)
Document: Case Studies (Word document)
Required Media
Psychotherapy.net (Producer). (2008c). Person-centered expressive arts therapy [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Author.
Discussion: Person-Centered Counseling: Case Conceptualization
For this Discussion, you will write a case conceptualization just as you did last week, but this time as though you were a person-centered counselor. A case conceptualization is a report that is written by a counselor to explain presenting problems, establish goals, plan interventions, and identify expected outcomes.
As you review this week's Learning Resources and media file, note techniques and interventions, and consider the role of a person-centered counselor in planning treatment. Further, reflect on person-centered therapy with respect to developing your own theoretical orientation. In what ways do you find that person-centered therapy resonates with your own point of view?
To Prepare:
· Review the person-centered expressive arts therapy video from this week's Learning Resources. Take note of language and techniques used by the counselor that are specific to this theory.
· Review the Psychoanalytic Case Conceptualization Example found in this week’s Learning Resources and use this document to prepare your initial Discussion post.
· Select one of the four case studies presented in this week’s Learning Resources, and answe ...
Similar to Definition Presentation (20)
The toulmin modelA six-part model of presenting and critiquing.docx
The toulmin modelA six-part model of presenting and critiquing.docx
Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docx
Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docx
Resume personal statementWe must improve conditions for specia.docx
Resume personal statementWe must improve conditions for specia.docx
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx
I am an athlete and I think because I had a training for seven ye.docx
I am an athlete and I think because I had a training for seven ye.docx
How to use this template To use this template, replace the inst.docx
How to use this template To use this template, replace the inst.docx
Week 3 Humanistic TheoriesThe good life is a process, not a sta.docx
Week 3 Humanistic TheoriesThe good life is a process, not a sta.docx
Recently uploaded
Constructing Your Course Container for Effective Communication
Communicating effectively and consistently with students can help them feel at ease during their learning experience and provide the instructor with a communication trail to track the course's progress. This workshop will take you through constructing an engaging course container to facilitate effective communication.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Event Link:- https://meetups.mulesoft.com/events/details/mulesoft-mysore-presents-mule-event-processing-models/
Agenda
● What is event processing in MuleSoft?
● Types of event processing models in Mule 4
● Distinction between the reactive, parallel, blocking & non-blocking processing
For Upcoming Meetups Join Mysore Meetup Group - https://meetups.mulesoft.com/mysore/YouTube:- youtube.com/@mulesoftmysore
Mysore WhatsApp group:- https://chat.whatsapp.com/EhqtHtCC75vCAX7gaO842N
Speaker:-
Shivani Yasaswi - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shivaniyasaswi/
Organizers:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Giridhar Meka - https://www.linkedin.com/in/giridharmeka
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Solutons Maths Escape Room Spatial .pptx
Solutions of Puzzles of Mathematics Escape Room Game in Spatial.io
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
clinical examination of hip joint (1).pdf
described clinical examination all orthopeadic conditions .
Bed Making ( Introduction, Purpose, Types, Articles, Scientific principles, N...
Topic : Bed making
Subject : Nursing Foundation
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Recently uploaded (20)
Constructing Your Course Container for Effective Communication
Constructing Your Course Container for Effective Communication
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Bed Making ( Introduction, Purpose, Types, Articles, Scientific principles, N...
Bed Making ( Introduction, Purpose, Types, Articles, Scientific principles, N...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
Definition Presentation
- 1. The Basics of Definition Definition Division Genus
- 2. Definition…
- 3. Definition: What is it? Answer : When you unfold the subject being analyzed to introduce it better.
- 5. Definition: When to use it? Answer: Answer : Can be used to… Clarify and establish the grounds of the argument.
- 6. Definition: When not to use it? Answer : 1. Not to be used as a stalling method . 2. A vague and/or irrelevant dictionary definition should not be used.
- 8. Genus…
- 9. Genus: What is it? Answer: Answer : The classification of a group of anything.
- 10. Genus: Why is it useful? Answer: It improves the depth of the main arguments in a literary piece or speech.
- 14. Division…
- 15. Division: What is it? Answer: Involves outlining the species of the genus.
- 16. Division: Why is it useful? Answer: Helps the reader/audience understand the content being discussed.
- 18. Division: When not to use it? Answer : Cannot be used… As an excuse to formulate irrelevant choices for an “elimination”.