Formal Debate
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•1,034 views
This document provides instructions for participating in a debate. It outlines the basic steps, which are to receive a debate topic, define the topic if needed, write an argument within the time limit, present the argument, balance making your own points and rebutting opponents', follow the three rules of rebuttal by offering evidence, attacking important parts of the opponents' argument, and avoiding personal attacks. It also notes that debates are usually judged on matter, manner, and method, including the amount and relevancy of evidence, presentation skills, teamwork, and individual skills.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Argumentative essays writing
An argumentative essay presents a claim and supports it with evidence from sources. It should take a clear stance on an issue that can be supported, such as whether selling marijuana in public places should be illegal. The essay includes an explanation of the issue, a thesis statement stating the stance, a summary of opposing arguments, rebuttals to those arguments, and arguments supporting the stance. Key elements are explaining the issue, a clear thesis, summarizing opposing views, rebutting them, and making your own argument.
They say, I say ch 1
The document introduces the concept of academic writing as argumentative and responding to the ideas of others. It advocates using a "they say, I say" format to disagree, challenge ideas, and stir up controversy. There are different ways to respond to others, such as disagreeing, agreeing, or both. The purpose is to become a critical thinker engaged in conversations and debates by building on informed ideas rather than just recounting them. Chapter 1 discusses starting with what others are saying to provide context for new arguments. It also recommends keeping prior ideas in view throughout responses, such as with return sentences that continually reference the original "they say" statements.
Argument notes
This document defines argument and outlines how to develop effective arguments. It discusses three models of argument: as a fight, as a two-sided debate, and as a collaborative process. The document recommends viewing argument as a truth-seeking process that results in a persuasive product. It also outlines five levels of argument development that move from personal opinions to an understanding of audience assumptions and values. The document provides a framework for writing a classical argument.
British parliamentary debate
British parliamentary debate. British Parliamentary Debate is a debate done on the spot. This article will cover how to debate in this style and provide some useful tips.
Argument and persuasion
Persuasive writing aims to convince readers to adopt a certain viewpoint using sound reasoning and evidence. It presents a claim supported by multiple reasons backed by facts, expert opinions, statistics, or personal observations. Strong arguments also address potential counterarguments in a fair manner before rebutting them to demonstrate that the writer has considered alternative perspectives. Effective persuasive essays follow a standard format that introduces the claim, discusses each supporting reason and evidence, addresses counterarguments, and concludes by restating the central claim.
How to write a debate outline
1) The document provides guidance on how to write an effective debate outline, including identifying the debate format, doing thorough research, following outlining principles, structuring the case and potential rebuttals, and avoiding logical fallacies.
2) It recommends identifying the debate format which determines the structure, doing research to find solid evidence for arguments and potential counterarguments, and outlining the case with a strong introduction, body, and conclusion.
3) The document also cautions about logical fallacies to avoid such as straw man arguments, slippery slopes, ad hominem attacks, and relying on anecdotes instead of evidence.
Argumentation
The document provides an overview of argumentation and the key components of constructing a strong argument. It discusses the importance of logos (facts and evidence), ethos (credibility), and pathos (appeals to emotion). Additionally, it outlines common types of reasoning, things to consider like acknowledging other viewpoints, and logical fallacies to avoid. The document emphasizes researching all sides of an issue thoroughly and being able to refute opposing arguments.
They Say, I Say Ch 4
The document outlines six ways to respond to opinions or interpretations: agree, disagree, agree and disagree simultaneously, disagree and explain why, agree but with a difference, and agree and disagree simultaneously. It recommends clearly stating your position before supporting your ideas and providing persuasive reasons when disagreeing. Agreeing and disagreeing simultaneously allows for a complex argument that readers can easily understand.
Recommended
Argumentative essays writing
An argumentative essay presents a claim and supports it with evidence from sources. It should take a clear stance on an issue that can be supported, such as whether selling marijuana in public places should be illegal. The essay includes an explanation of the issue, a thesis statement stating the stance, a summary of opposing arguments, rebuttals to those arguments, and arguments supporting the stance. Key elements are explaining the issue, a clear thesis, summarizing opposing views, rebutting them, and making your own argument.
They say, I say ch 1
The document introduces the concept of academic writing as argumentative and responding to the ideas of others. It advocates using a "they say, I say" format to disagree, challenge ideas, and stir up controversy. There are different ways to respond to others, such as disagreeing, agreeing, or both. The purpose is to become a critical thinker engaged in conversations and debates by building on informed ideas rather than just recounting them. Chapter 1 discusses starting with what others are saying to provide context for new arguments. It also recommends keeping prior ideas in view throughout responses, such as with return sentences that continually reference the original "they say" statements.
Argument notes
This document defines argument and outlines how to develop effective arguments. It discusses three models of argument: as a fight, as a two-sided debate, and as a collaborative process. The document recommends viewing argument as a truth-seeking process that results in a persuasive product. It also outlines five levels of argument development that move from personal opinions to an understanding of audience assumptions and values. The document provides a framework for writing a classical argument.
British parliamentary debate
British parliamentary debate. British Parliamentary Debate is a debate done on the spot. This article will cover how to debate in this style and provide some useful tips.
Argument and persuasion
Persuasive writing aims to convince readers to adopt a certain viewpoint using sound reasoning and evidence. It presents a claim supported by multiple reasons backed by facts, expert opinions, statistics, or personal observations. Strong arguments also address potential counterarguments in a fair manner before rebutting them to demonstrate that the writer has considered alternative perspectives. Effective persuasive essays follow a standard format that introduces the claim, discusses each supporting reason and evidence, addresses counterarguments, and concludes by restating the central claim.
How to write a debate outline
1) The document provides guidance on how to write an effective debate outline, including identifying the debate format, doing thorough research, following outlining principles, structuring the case and potential rebuttals, and avoiding logical fallacies.
2) It recommends identifying the debate format which determines the structure, doing research to find solid evidence for arguments and potential counterarguments, and outlining the case with a strong introduction, body, and conclusion.
3) The document also cautions about logical fallacies to avoid such as straw man arguments, slippery slopes, ad hominem attacks, and relying on anecdotes instead of evidence.
Argumentation
The document provides an overview of argumentation and the key components of constructing a strong argument. It discusses the importance of logos (facts and evidence), ethos (credibility), and pathos (appeals to emotion). Additionally, it outlines common types of reasoning, things to consider like acknowledging other viewpoints, and logical fallacies to avoid. The document emphasizes researching all sides of an issue thoroughly and being able to refute opposing arguments.
They Say, I Say Ch 4
The document outlines six ways to respond to opinions or interpretations: agree, disagree, agree and disagree simultaneously, disagree and explain why, agree but with a difference, and agree and disagree simultaneously. It recommends clearly stating your position before supporting your ideas and providing persuasive reasons when disagreeing. Agreeing and disagreeing simultaneously allows for a complex argument that readers can easily understand.
Teaching Argumentative Writing
This document summarizes research on teaching argumentative skills to middle school students. It begins by defining argumentation and distinguishing it from persuasion. It then examines two studies: 1) A quasi-experimental study that looked at engaging 8th graders in argumentative discourse activities and found improvements in individual arguments and peer discussions. 2) A case study of a 7th grade class that engaged in a debate project on capital punishment, which also found gains in student argument skills. The document provides an overview of key components of arguments like claims, evidence, warrants, rebuttals, and discusses challenges adolescents face with argumentation. It concludes that structured activities focused on developing these skills can enhance students' abilities to construct and engage in arguments.
Conflict Resolution
The document discusses conflict intervention and resolution models. It describes four approaches to intervene in conflicts: dismiss, distract, discuss/develop, and detonate. The discuss/develop approach involves asking clarifying questions, exploring underlying issues, and using active listening. When deciding how to address a conflict, factors like the personal nature of the issue, team skills, time constraints, and goals should be considered. Generally, teams are best able to resolve their own conflicts, but private intervention may be needed in some cases.
Argumentative essays
This document provides guidance on writing an argumentative or persuasive essay. It discusses choosing a debatable topic, conducting research to support an opinion, writing a thesis statement, supporting the thesis with reasons and addressing counterarguments. The document outlines the typical structure of an introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion. It also offers tips on effectively presenting an argument and avoiding ineffective approaches.
Negotiation
This document discusses various aspects of negotiation including:
- Types of negotiation such as distributive vs integrative and phases of negotiation.
- Skills needed for successful negotiation including effective communication, a positive attitude, and emotional intelligence.
- Steps for preparing for negotiation including setting parameters, establishing common ground, and understanding each party's zone of possible agreement (ZOPA).
- Different types of bargaining approaches such as positional bargaining which can be soft or hard.
Build Strong Arguments
This is a presentation for a training session for the Social Sciences Research Development Initiative (SSRDI), it is part of the Academic Skills Lectures Series.
Argumentative Writing
This document provides an overview of argumentative writing elements and structures for students in a WRIT 122 college course. It defines key elements like claims, reasons, evidence and addressing opposition. It also explains the structures of Toulmin, classical and Rogerian arguments, highlighting their different components and approaches. The document aims to help students learn and apply these concepts in their own argumentative writing.
Negotiation as persuasion
Mediation is a structured process where a neutral third party helps disputing parties resolve conflict through specialized communication and negotiation techniques. The context of mediation refers to the circumstances surrounding an event that help provide full understanding. While negotiation is a dialogue between two parties aimed at resolving an issue, persuasion is the process of influencing another to do what you want through reasoning. Persuasion principles like reciprocity, scarcity, and authority can be tools in negotiation, but negotiation requires compromise from both sides, whereas persuasion is a one-way attempt to influence.
Second Quarter- Communication-Grade 7.pptx
This document provides a lesson on verbal and non-verbal communication. It defines verbal communication as communication using words and non-verbal communication as communication through actions without words. It identifies different types of non-verbal communication such as body language, proximity, touch, eye movement, and paralanguage. Examples of both verbal and non-verbal communication are provided. Students are then asked to identify situations as verbal or non-verbal and analyze examples of non-verbal communication. The lesson aims to help students understand and differentiate between verbal and non-verbal communication.
Differentiating BIas and Prejudice G-9 Presentation.pptx
This document differentiates between bias and prejudice. Bias refers to favoring or disfavoring someone or something in an unfair manner due to personal opinions. Prejudice refers to pre-judging someone before considering evidence. Common types of bias include anchoring bias, halo effect, media bias, conformity bias, and confirmation bias. Common types of prejudice include racism, sexism, ageism, and classism. The document provides examples of bias versus prejudice to illustrate the difference between the two concepts.
Negotiation
Our Group ppt about Negotiation was considered as one of the best presentation of the class in the year 2011-12.
Persuasion vs. argument
Persuasion writing aims to convince the reader of the writer's point of view, while argument writing acknowledges other views but aims to show the writer's perspective is valid and deserves consideration. Persuasion relies more on emotion and opinion to sway the reader, whereas argument offers credible evidence and reasons for its perspective. The goal of persuasion is agreement, while the goal of argument is acknowledgment of a worthy perspective.
Argumentative Essays (Self-study version)
This document provides information and instructions about writing an argumentative essay. It explains that an argumentative essay requires agreeing or disagreeing with an issue using reasons to support an opinion. There are two common patterns for organizing an argumentative essay: the block pattern, which rebuts the opposing arguments first before presenting your own; and the point-by-point pattern, which alternates between presenting an opposing argument and rebutting it with your counterargument. The introduction should explain the issue, include a thesis statement stating your position, and may reference opposing viewpoints.
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
The document provides an overview of basic debating skills. It defines what a debate is, the roles of different speakers, how to structure arguments and rebuttals, and tips for effective delivery. A debate involves presenting structured speeches on opposing sides of an issue to determine the stronger argument. Each speaker has a designated role, such as introducing the topic or rebutting the other side's arguments. Debaters are scored on the substance of their arguments, how they organize their presentation, and their public speaking mannerisms. The goal is a logical, well-structured exchange of ideas, not an undisciplined shouting match.
Writing a business letter
The document provides instructions for writing a business letter, including the proper format and elements. It explains that a business letter should include the sender's address and date in the top left corner, followed by the recipient's address below with 4 spaces of separation. Below the addresses should be a salutation like "Dear Sir or Madam". The body of the letter should provide factual details of the purpose for writing, which is usually to make a complaint or compliment. The letter should close with a signature and the writer's name 4 spaces below.
TSIS: Ch 4 Revised
This document discusses templates for agreeing, disagreeing, or doing both when responding to arguments. It addresses that templates are useful for learning fundamentals and providing structure without stifling creativity. Some challenges discussed are being direct when agreeing, stating reasons when disagreeing, and adding something new when simply agreeing. The document provides example templates for disagreeing, agreeing and disagreeing simultaneously, and other favorites like being of two minds on an issue. Templates allow for nuanced responses that agree with some aspects and disagree with others.
Argumentative essay outline
Why do you need to write your Argumentative Essay Outline? You can find out the answer after watching this presentation. We also recommend to read an article https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NksUxKaaEyU&feature=youtu.be
Ppt on Conflict
This document discusses the nature and sources of conflict. It defines conflict as a serious disagreement or argument. There are several views of conflict - the traditional view sees it as harmful, the human relations view sees it as natural and inevitable, and the interactionist view sees it as necessary for group performance. Conflict arises from potential opposition, cognition and personalization of issues, intentions to act, behaviors, and outcomes. Main sources include aggression, competition, frustration, clashes in values and interests, cultural influences, and misinformation. The document outlines different types of conflicts at the individual, group, and organizational levels and describes strategies for preventing and handling conflicts.
Counterclaims
This document provides guidance on how to effectively identify and rebut counterclaims. It defines key terms like counterclaims, which are claims that negate or disagree with the thesis, and rebuttals, which are evidence that negate or disagree with counterclaims. Examples of counterclaims are provided for debates on raising the minimum wage and allowing Syrian refugees. The document advises that addressing counterclaims establishes credibility, finds common ground with readers, and responds to possible criticism. It provides guidance on structuring rebuttals with evidence and adding one's own commentary and analysis to further explain why one's position is correct. Sentence frames are also offered for introducing counterclaims and rebuttals.
Introduction to BP debate
This document provides an introduction to the format of British parliamentary debate. It outlines the key components of a parliamentary debate, including the motions or topics that are debated, the order and roles of the eight speakers (prime minister, leader of opposition, etc.), and how debates are evaluated. The main points covered are: (1) Debates involve four teams of two debaters each who are assigned to support or oppose a motion. (2) Speakers present arguments in a set order, with specific roles like defining the motion or rebutting opponents. (3) Points of information can be offered to other speakers. (4) Debates are evaluated based on the strength of arguments rather than speaking ability.
Patterns of organization and methods of development
Use appropriate grammatical signals or expressions suitable to each pattern of idea development:
● general to particular
● claim and counterclaim
● problem-solution
● cause-effect
and others
Asigmen ( aidil )
The document outlines the order of procedure and criteria for judging a parliamentary debate competition.
The order of procedure lists the various stages of a debate, including time allotted for proposing and opposing the motion, open debate, and summaries. Judges will assess teams on their strategy, content, and style, with an emphasis on teamwork, rebuttal, logical arguments, and oratory skills. Additional guidance is provided on definitions, burden of proof, and the goal of evaluating how teams would impress a reasonable observer.
Oxford oregon debate
This document outlines the format and rules for an Oxford-style debate. It discusses the traditional debate structure used in various settings which involves two opposing sides - affirmative and negative. Each side has three speakers who give constructive speeches and rebuttals. The debate is moderated and judged based on evidence, delivery, responses to questions, and rebuttals. Specific guidelines are provided around constructing arguments, asking and answering questions during the debate, and providing rebuttals.
More Related Content
What's hot
Teaching Argumentative Writing
This document summarizes research on teaching argumentative skills to middle school students. It begins by defining argumentation and distinguishing it from persuasion. It then examines two studies: 1) A quasi-experimental study that looked at engaging 8th graders in argumentative discourse activities and found improvements in individual arguments and peer discussions. 2) A case study of a 7th grade class that engaged in a debate project on capital punishment, which also found gains in student argument skills. The document provides an overview of key components of arguments like claims, evidence, warrants, rebuttals, and discusses challenges adolescents face with argumentation. It concludes that structured activities focused on developing these skills can enhance students' abilities to construct and engage in arguments.
Conflict Resolution
The document discusses conflict intervention and resolution models. It describes four approaches to intervene in conflicts: dismiss, distract, discuss/develop, and detonate. The discuss/develop approach involves asking clarifying questions, exploring underlying issues, and using active listening. When deciding how to address a conflict, factors like the personal nature of the issue, team skills, time constraints, and goals should be considered. Generally, teams are best able to resolve their own conflicts, but private intervention may be needed in some cases.
Argumentative essays
This document provides guidance on writing an argumentative or persuasive essay. It discusses choosing a debatable topic, conducting research to support an opinion, writing a thesis statement, supporting the thesis with reasons and addressing counterarguments. The document outlines the typical structure of an introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion. It also offers tips on effectively presenting an argument and avoiding ineffective approaches.
Negotiation
This document discusses various aspects of negotiation including:
- Types of negotiation such as distributive vs integrative and phases of negotiation.
- Skills needed for successful negotiation including effective communication, a positive attitude, and emotional intelligence.
- Steps for preparing for negotiation including setting parameters, establishing common ground, and understanding each party's zone of possible agreement (ZOPA).
- Different types of bargaining approaches such as positional bargaining which can be soft or hard.
Build Strong Arguments
This is a presentation for a training session for the Social Sciences Research Development Initiative (SSRDI), it is part of the Academic Skills Lectures Series.
Argumentative Writing
This document provides an overview of argumentative writing elements and structures for students in a WRIT 122 college course. It defines key elements like claims, reasons, evidence and addressing opposition. It also explains the structures of Toulmin, classical and Rogerian arguments, highlighting their different components and approaches. The document aims to help students learn and apply these concepts in their own argumentative writing.
Negotiation as persuasion
Mediation is a structured process where a neutral third party helps disputing parties resolve conflict through specialized communication and negotiation techniques. The context of mediation refers to the circumstances surrounding an event that help provide full understanding. While negotiation is a dialogue between two parties aimed at resolving an issue, persuasion is the process of influencing another to do what you want through reasoning. Persuasion principles like reciprocity, scarcity, and authority can be tools in negotiation, but negotiation requires compromise from both sides, whereas persuasion is a one-way attempt to influence.
Second Quarter- Communication-Grade 7.pptx
This document provides a lesson on verbal and non-verbal communication. It defines verbal communication as communication using words and non-verbal communication as communication through actions without words. It identifies different types of non-verbal communication such as body language, proximity, touch, eye movement, and paralanguage. Examples of both verbal and non-verbal communication are provided. Students are then asked to identify situations as verbal or non-verbal and analyze examples of non-verbal communication. The lesson aims to help students understand and differentiate between verbal and non-verbal communication.
Differentiating BIas and Prejudice G-9 Presentation.pptx
This document differentiates between bias and prejudice. Bias refers to favoring or disfavoring someone or something in an unfair manner due to personal opinions. Prejudice refers to pre-judging someone before considering evidence. Common types of bias include anchoring bias, halo effect, media bias, conformity bias, and confirmation bias. Common types of prejudice include racism, sexism, ageism, and classism. The document provides examples of bias versus prejudice to illustrate the difference between the two concepts.
Negotiation
Our Group ppt about Negotiation was considered as one of the best presentation of the class in the year 2011-12.
Persuasion vs. argument
Persuasion writing aims to convince the reader of the writer's point of view, while argument writing acknowledges other views but aims to show the writer's perspective is valid and deserves consideration. Persuasion relies more on emotion and opinion to sway the reader, whereas argument offers credible evidence and reasons for its perspective. The goal of persuasion is agreement, while the goal of argument is acknowledgment of a worthy perspective.
Argumentative Essays (Self-study version)
This document provides information and instructions about writing an argumentative essay. It explains that an argumentative essay requires agreeing or disagreeing with an issue using reasons to support an opinion. There are two common patterns for organizing an argumentative essay: the block pattern, which rebuts the opposing arguments first before presenting your own; and the point-by-point pattern, which alternates between presenting an opposing argument and rebutting it with your counterargument. The introduction should explain the issue, include a thesis statement stating your position, and may reference opposing viewpoints.
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
The document provides an overview of basic debating skills. It defines what a debate is, the roles of different speakers, how to structure arguments and rebuttals, and tips for effective delivery. A debate involves presenting structured speeches on opposing sides of an issue to determine the stronger argument. Each speaker has a designated role, such as introducing the topic or rebutting the other side's arguments. Debaters are scored on the substance of their arguments, how they organize their presentation, and their public speaking mannerisms. The goal is a logical, well-structured exchange of ideas, not an undisciplined shouting match.
Writing a business letter
The document provides instructions for writing a business letter, including the proper format and elements. It explains that a business letter should include the sender's address and date in the top left corner, followed by the recipient's address below with 4 spaces of separation. Below the addresses should be a salutation like "Dear Sir or Madam". The body of the letter should provide factual details of the purpose for writing, which is usually to make a complaint or compliment. The letter should close with a signature and the writer's name 4 spaces below.
TSIS: Ch 4 Revised
This document discusses templates for agreeing, disagreeing, or doing both when responding to arguments. It addresses that templates are useful for learning fundamentals and providing structure without stifling creativity. Some challenges discussed are being direct when agreeing, stating reasons when disagreeing, and adding something new when simply agreeing. The document provides example templates for disagreeing, agreeing and disagreeing simultaneously, and other favorites like being of two minds on an issue. Templates allow for nuanced responses that agree with some aspects and disagree with others.
Argumentative essay outline
Why do you need to write your Argumentative Essay Outline? You can find out the answer after watching this presentation. We also recommend to read an article https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NksUxKaaEyU&feature=youtu.be
Ppt on Conflict
This document discusses the nature and sources of conflict. It defines conflict as a serious disagreement or argument. There are several views of conflict - the traditional view sees it as harmful, the human relations view sees it as natural and inevitable, and the interactionist view sees it as necessary for group performance. Conflict arises from potential opposition, cognition and personalization of issues, intentions to act, behaviors, and outcomes. Main sources include aggression, competition, frustration, clashes in values and interests, cultural influences, and misinformation. The document outlines different types of conflicts at the individual, group, and organizational levels and describes strategies for preventing and handling conflicts.
Counterclaims
This document provides guidance on how to effectively identify and rebut counterclaims. It defines key terms like counterclaims, which are claims that negate or disagree with the thesis, and rebuttals, which are evidence that negate or disagree with counterclaims. Examples of counterclaims are provided for debates on raising the minimum wage and allowing Syrian refugees. The document advises that addressing counterclaims establishes credibility, finds common ground with readers, and responds to possible criticism. It provides guidance on structuring rebuttals with evidence and adding one's own commentary and analysis to further explain why one's position is correct. Sentence frames are also offered for introducing counterclaims and rebuttals.
Introduction to BP debate
This document provides an introduction to the format of British parliamentary debate. It outlines the key components of a parliamentary debate, including the motions or topics that are debated, the order and roles of the eight speakers (prime minister, leader of opposition, etc.), and how debates are evaluated. The main points covered are: (1) Debates involve four teams of two debaters each who are assigned to support or oppose a motion. (2) Speakers present arguments in a set order, with specific roles like defining the motion or rebutting opponents. (3) Points of information can be offered to other speakers. (4) Debates are evaluated based on the strength of arguments rather than speaking ability.
Patterns of organization and methods of development
Use appropriate grammatical signals or expressions suitable to each pattern of idea development:
● general to particular
● claim and counterclaim
● problem-solution
● cause-effect
and others
What's hot (20)
Differentiating BIas and Prejudice G-9 Presentation.pptx
Differentiating BIas and Prejudice G-9 Presentation.pptx
Patterns of organization and methods of development
Patterns of organization and methods of development
Similar to Formal Debate
Asigmen ( aidil )
The document outlines the order of procedure and criteria for judging a parliamentary debate competition.
The order of procedure lists the various stages of a debate, including time allotted for proposing and opposing the motion, open debate, and summaries. Judges will assess teams on their strategy, content, and style, with an emphasis on teamwork, rebuttal, logical arguments, and oratory skills. Additional guidance is provided on definitions, burden of proof, and the goal of evaluating how teams would impress a reasonable observer.
Oxford oregon debate
This document outlines the format and rules for an Oxford-style debate. It discusses the traditional debate structure used in various settings which involves two opposing sides - affirmative and negative. Each side has three speakers who give constructive speeches and rebuttals. The debate is moderated and judged based on evidence, delivery, responses to questions, and rebuttals. Specific guidelines are provided around constructing arguments, asking and answering questions during the debate, and providing rebuttals.
Материалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла Поппера
The document provides guidance on structuring arguments for a debate. It recommends introducing the theme, defining key terms, and outlining 3 main arguments supported by evidence like examples, statistics and quotes. It also suggests anticipating opposing arguments and preparing rebuttals by identifying questions opponents may ask and ways to defend your own points. The overall structure involves an introduction, presenting the case and conclusion in both the opening and subsequent speeches.
How to debate
Debating involves a structured argument between two sides on a topic. Each side is given a set time to speak for or against the issue. The goal is to improve speaking skills and experience in developing convincing arguments. Basic debating skills include style, speed, tone, volume, and clarity of expression. A good debate includes introducing the argument, building the case with evidence, and rebutting the opposing side's arguments.
Debate Rules,Tips, Do & Don'ts
This slides will be helpful if you have interest on debating as all the sections and parts of Debate has mentioned.
Conducting a debate
The document outlines the steps for organizing and participating in a debate, including developing a resolution, establishing rules, researching the topic, anticipating counterarguments, and planning speeches. It provides guidance on the structure of the debate with opening speeches from both sides, a rebuttal period, and closing speeches to summarize arguments without introducing new information. Key parts of the speeches are identified, such as clearly stating the resolution in the first speech and identifying conflicts in the second. Dos and don'ts of the debate process are also listed, such as thoroughly researching the topic but avoiding personal attacks.
How to debate
This document provides instructions on how to debate effectively. It discusses what a debate is, why people debate, and basic debating skills. The skills covered include style, speed, tone, volume, clarity, use of notes, eye contact, content, case structure, and rebuttal techniques. The document emphasizes the importance of presenting arguments in a clear, logical, and evidence-based manner while also engaging with the audience. Debates involve structuring an argument, supporting various positions, and systematically addressing opposing views.
Debate 101 oktafia
Combining from many sources specially the ones I get from English Debate Society of Universitas Bakrie, here's the Debate 101 presentation that I usually used in my coaching or teaching activities.
Tips and tricks for trial
1. The document provides tips for different roles in a mock trial, including instructions for all members, jury members, witnesses, the bailiff, prosecution, and defense.
2. It emphasizes coming prepared with notes, speaking clearly, remaining in character, listening to others, and asking clarifying questions if confused.
3. Specific roles are given direction on procedures like swearing in witnesses, making objections, taking notes, and structuring questioning of witnesses to establish their cases.
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
This document outlines the rules and guidelines for a debate using the Oxford-Oregon format on the proposition of adopting a parliamentary form of government. It details the structure of the debate with three speakers on each side, the allotted time limits, judging criteria, and tips for constructive speeches, cross-examination, and rebuttals. The roles of the moderator and timer are also defined.
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
This is a pilot presentation for a multi-campus ESL learning opportunity allowing English learners to engage in higher level discussions in a structured manner.
Rules and guidelines on debate competition
This document outlines the rules and guidelines for a debate using the Oxford-Oregon format between two teams arguing whether a parliamentary form of government should be adopted. It specifies there will be three speakers on each side, the issues being debated, time limits, criteria for judging, and tips for the constructive speeches, interrogation periods, and rebuttals. The roles of the moderator and timer are also defined.
Basic debating skills
This document provides an overview of basic debating skills. It explains that a debate involves arguing for or against a topic using strict rules of conduct and sophisticated arguing techniques. A topic defines what will be debated, with an affirmative team arguing for the topic and a negative team arguing against it. Each debating team has three speakers with specified roles, such as defining the topic, presenting arguments, rebutting the opposing team's arguments, and summarizing their team's position. Speakers are evaluated on the substance of their arguments, how well they are organized and presented, and their public speaking mannerisms. The goal is to build a persuasive case using clear logic and examples while following proper debating protocols.
Advanced 5 b
This document provides guidance on writing a persuasive essay. It explains that a persuasive essay attempts to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint using logical reasons and evidence. It stresses the importance of having a clear thesis statement and supporting it with facts, examples, and quotes from experts. It then lists several key steps to take when planning a persuasive essay, such as choosing a position, researching the topic thoroughly, outlining the structure, and supporting the thesis with evidence while also addressing alternative viewpoints. Finally, it discusses different types of evidence that can be used such as facts, statistics, quotes, and examples.
Basics of Mooting in Law School
This presentation was part of a workshop carried out in Department of Law & Justice in Jahangirnagar University where law students were briefed on the basics of moot court related activities.
Teaching debate skills
The document summarizes a presentation on incorporating debate into English language teaching. It discusses what debate is, the skills it helps develop, how to design a debate-focused syllabus, and tips for structuring classroom debates. Debate involves arguing for or against a resolution and helps improve students' critical thinking, research, public speaking and listening skills. The presentation provides examples of debate topics and structures for classroom debates, as well as suggestions for supporting arguments and developing counterarguments.
The Art of Debating?
This document provides an overview of debating skills. It discusses what debating is, the benefits of debating, and basic debating skills. The key points covered are:
- Debating is a structured argument where two sides alternately argue for and against a contention on a topic. It allows opposing views to be discussed without insults.
- Benefits of debating include improving speaking skills and gaining experience developing convincing arguments while considering multiple perspectives.
- Basic debating skills include effective style, pace, tone, volume, clarity, use of notes, understanding other positions, and amicably resolving debates. Strategies like preparing arguments, rebuttals, and conceding small points are also discussed
Debate .pptx
This document provides information about debates, including what a debate is, the structure of formal debates, important elements and strategies for debates. It discusses that a debate involves two sides discussing a resolution, with one side supporting and one opposing. It emphasizes that the goal is to improve arguments, not raise voices. Key parts of debates are identified as the parties, speeches, judge and decision. Central elements of arguments are outlined as perspective, development, exchange of ideas, refutation and defense. The document provides guidance on preparing for and participating in debates.
Persuade & Debate 1
This document provides guidance for a 5th grade persuasive writing project. It explains that students will be assigned a proposition to argue either for or against, such as whether dogs are better than cats. It lists several potential propositions and instructs students to write a thesis statement stating their position. The document outlines what a good persuasive essay should include, such as understanding both sides of an issue and developing at least two well-supported reasons for their argument. It also provides tips for research, note taking, and presenting opposing arguments.
Debate notes and format w rubric
This document provides information and instructions for participating in a debate. It discusses the key differences between negotiation and debate, offers tips for effective negotiation techniques, and outlines the debate format and process. The debate topics center around claims such as whether men or women are better at certain things. Guidelines are provided for researching the topics, preparing arguments, the structure of the debate rounds, and how participants will be scored. The goal is to have students engage in civil discourse to argue for or against various statements or resolutions.
Similar to Formal Debate (20)
Материалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла Поппера
Материалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла Поппера
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
More from Mary Star
Ecosystem
An ecosystem is defined as a biological community of interacting organisms and their physical environment. It includes both biotic factors such as plants, animals, fungi and bacteria, as well as abiotic nonliving factors like climate, soil and rocks. Within an ecosystem, organisms live in a habitat and often have symbiotic relationships where they live closely and benefit from one another.
Camiguin Island
The document summarizes information about the island province of Camiguin in the Philippines. It states that Camiguin is a volcanic island located north of Mindanao, bounded by seas on all sides. Camiguin has a land area of 29,187 hectares and a population of 74,232 people, making it the smallest province and second smallest in population in Northern Mindanao. The island is home to seven volcanoes including the still active Mount Hibok-Hibok. Several tourist attractions on Camiguin are then described, including Katibawasan Falls, Ardent Hot Spring, Bura Soda Water Swimming Pool, Sto. Niño Cold Spring, White Island, and Tanguines
Performing well in a debate
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Informal Debate
This document provides tips for conversational or informal debating, reminding the reader to not dominate the conversation, to assume the other person has good intentions, and to keep things civilized without raising their voice or allowing the debate to become heated. The goal is a free exchange of ideas rather than one person insisting they are right and the other is wrong, and for the debate to be enlightening rather than aggressive.
how to prepare for debates
To prepare for debates, you must take definite steps to adequately prepare yourself to debate and defend your positions. This includes researching your topic thoroughly so you understand both sides of the issue and can anticipate counterarguments. You should also practice delivering your main points concisely within time limits.
2nd Law of motion
According to Newton's
second law...
Acceleration is produced when a force acts on a mass. The greater the mass (of the object being accelerated) the greater the amount of force needed (to accelerate the object).
What does this mean?
Everyone unconsiously knows the Second Law. Everyone knows that heavier objects require more force to move the same distance as lighter objects.
However, the Second Law gives us an exact relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. It can be expressed as a mathematical equation:
FORCE = MASS times ACCELERATION
Newton's second law of motion explains how an object will change velocity if it is pushed or pulled upon.
Firstly, this law states that if you do place a force on an object, it will accelerate (change its velocity), and it will change its velocity in the direction of the force. So, a force aimed in a positive direction will create a positive change in velocity (a positive acceleration). And a force aimed in a negative direction will create a negative change in velocity (a negative acceleration).
Secondly, this acceleration is directly proportional to the force. For example, if you are pushing on an object, causing it to accelerate, and then you push, say, three times harder, the acceleration will be three times greater.
More from Mary Star (8)
Recently uploaded
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdRPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS Template 2023-2024 by: Irene S. Rueco
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar KanvariaAzure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcAdvanced Java[Extra Concepts, Not Difficult].docx
This is part 2 of my Java Learning Journey. This contains Hashing, ArrayList, LinkedList, Date and Time Classes, Calendar Class and more.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Recently uploaded (20)
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Formal Debate
- 2. 1 Be ready to receive a topic to get to go debate on.
- 3. 2 Define the topic, if necessary.
- 4. 3 Write your argument according to the designated time limit (Usually 7 minutes).
- 6. 5 Strike a balance between presenting your team's point(s) and rebutting the opponents' point.
- 7. 6 Note the three rules of rebuttal.
- 8. 1.Offer evidence for your rebuttal. Do not rely on vigorous assertion alone. 2.Attack the most important parts of their argument. It's not very effective if you pick bones with an obscure part of the opponent's argument. 3.No ad hominem attacks.
- 9. 7 Use up all your time (or most of it).
- 10. 8 Know what aspects of the debate you will be judged on, if appropriate. For the most part, debates are judged on three main areas: matter, manner, and method.
- 11. 1.Matter: oAmount of evidence. oRelevancy of evidence.
- 12. 2. Manner: oEye contact. oVoice. oBody language. oNervous habits. oElocution.
- 13. 3. Method: oTeam cohesion. oIndividual prowess.