Data protection for oracle backup & recovery for oracle databases

<Insert Picture Here>
Data Protection for Oracle:
Backup & Recovery for Oracle Databases
Download this slide
http://ouo.io/Fwjb1

Data Protection for Oracle Databases
Agenda
• Solution Overview: Data Protection for Oracle
Database environments
• Business Drivers, Target Markets and Customers
• Value Proposition / Key Messages
• Spotting, Qualifying and Sizing Opportunities
• Competition
• Architectural Considerations
• Customer Win Examples
• Resources

Solution Deployment Scenarios

Agenda
• Solution Overview: Data Protection for Oracle Database
environments
• Competition
• Resources

Business Drivers
Data protection concerns that keep customers awake at night
• Reducing costs (CAPEX, OPEX) and improving staff efficiency
• Complexity of BU&R process and the storage environment
• Meeting SLA's: shrinking backup windows; slow recovery processes
• Data loss exposure
- ESG 2008 estimates that 1 in7 (14%) backups and 1 in 6 (17%) restores fail.
• Data growth that is compounding year over year
• Managing multiple database instances and versions; and
provisioning and scaling those DBs to meet business needs
• Low utilization of server and storage infrastructure resources

Customer Profile
• Business types
- ZFSSA: Advanced Compression, Tape-only environments
- Tape: 9940, LTO3 and earlier, T10000A, L700, disk-only
environments
1. Solaris
2. Linux
• Audience titles
- Database Administrators (DBAs)
- Storage Administrators
- System Administrators
- Data Center Managers
- IT Directors

Recovery Point and Recovery Time
Recovery Point Objective
Tolerance for data loss (sec’s,
hours, days); determines
frequency of backups
Recovery Time Objective
The shorter the Recovery Time
Objective (RTO) the quicker you
get back to business
Data Loss
(Recovery Point Objective)
Downtime
(Recovery Time Objective)
Hrs Mins SecsWks Days HrsMinsSecs WksDays
Backup Window
Static, but needing to accommodate
an ever increasing amount of data
Value of Data
The Business value of data is
rarely understood

Backup & Recovery Recovery Time Objective (RTO)
Physical Data Protection
• Recovery Manager (RMAN)
• Oracle Secure Backup (OSB)
Minutes/Hours/Days
Logical Data Protection
• Flashback Technologies
Minutes/Hours
Oracle Data Protection Solutions
Disaster Recovery Recovery Time Objective (RTO)
Physical Data Protection
• Data Guard
Seconds/Minutes

Value Proposition
•Reduce administration time by up to 30%
•Integration with Enterprise Manager
Backup and recovery throughputs 4x greater
than competition help to reduce risk
Reduce TCO by over 50% vs. NetApp; 90%
vs. Data Domain; 85% vs. IBM tape
Speed
Savings
Simplicity

• Additional Revenue
- Oracle has a full portfolio of HW, SW, and Consulting Services
that allows customers to fully protect their environment.
- $400M+ opportunity for protecting Oracle databases and app’s
in Solaris environments*
- GCM Source Code: NA_HW_Data Protection for Oracle_FY12
Opportunity for Oracle
Benefits to the Oracle Team
*IDC Storage Workloads 2009

• NATO and NACH working together
- Competition from vendors such as EMC/Data Domain, and
NetApp is very real and competes against both Oracle HW and
SW offerings.
- Competitors must sell data services to add value to their
hardware: replication, compression, dedupe, encryption, etc.
- These data services compete directly with GoldenGate,
Advanced Data Guard, Advanced Compression, SecureFiles,
and Advanced Security
Opportunity for Oracle
Benefits to the Oracle Team
+ = More Comp for Everyone!

Data Protection for Oracle Value Prop
Savings
• ZFS Storage Appliance provides the only direct connect
IB connection to Solaris/OEL servers!
- Save up to $100k’s in disk-based license/support
• Space
- Hybrid Columnar Compression (10-15x)
- Advanced Compression (2-4x)
- ZFS compression (2-10x)
- Any of the above (typically) provide more space savings than
3rd party dedupe as included tools of either the Oracle
Database or ZFSSA.

Savings: Cash Flows And Metrics
NetApp 3270C and ZFS 7420C
•Save nearly $250,000 in 3 years over implementing a NetApp 3270C
BU&R offering – need 2 to match restore throughput of ZFSSA
•Discounting
- NetApp: HW: 50%, Service: 20% (no software)
- ZFSSA: HW: 30%, Service: 0%
•NetApp TCO is over 200% that of ZFSSA 7420C
Oracle Confidential – Internal and Partners ONLY
Solution Cost Summary Investment Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total
Total FAS3270 Cash Flow 342,840 43,078 45,658 47,471 479,047
Total ZFS7420C Cash Flow 148,292 27,413 28,259 28,373 232,337
Net Savings 194,548 15,665 17,399 19,098 246,710
Cumulative Net Savings 194,548 210,213 227,612 246,710

DD890 and ZFS 7420C
•Need 4 DD890’s to match recovery throughput of 7420C
•Save over $2,000,000 in 3 years over implementing a Data Domain
BU&R offering (4 DD890’s)
•Discounting
- Data Domain: HW: 50%, SW: 50% (no replication), Service: 0%
- ZFSSA: HW: 30%, Service: 0%
•DD890 offering TCO is over 10X that of ZFSSA 7420C
Solution Cost Summary Investment Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total
Total Data Domain Cash Flow 1,699,788 153,662 215,581 224,099 2,293,130
Total ZFS7420C Cash Flow 148,292 27,413 28,259 28,373 232,337
Net Savings 1,551,496 126,249 187,322 195,726 2,060,793
Cumulative Net Savings 1,551,496 1,677,745 1,865,067 2,060,793

TS3500 vs. SL3000 1PB
•SL3000 (1 T10000C), TS3500 (2 LTO5), 1:1 compression
•Discounting
- IBM: HW: 55%, SW: 55%, Service: 55%
- Oracle: HW: 55%, Service: 0%
•TS3500 offering TCO is nearly 85% more that of SL3000
Solution Cost Summary Investment Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Total IBM TS3500 Cash
Flow
150,533 25,980 88,898 108,519 169,924 209,950 753,804
Total Oracle SL3000 Cash
Flow
100,933 12,072 54,109 50,762 84,846 106,559 409,281
Net Savings 49,600 13,908 34,789 57,757 85,078 103,391 344,523
Cumulative Net Savings 49,600 63,508 98,297 156,054 241,132 344,523

TS3500 vs. SL8500 10PB
•SL8500 (T10000C), TS3500 (LTO5), 1:1 compression
•Discounting
- IBM: HW: 60%, SW: 60%, Service: 60%
- ZFSSA: HW: 60%, Software: 60% Service: 0%
•TS3500 offering TCO is over $2M more than SL8500
Solution Cost Summary Investment Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Total IBM TS3500 Cash
Flow
947,477 120,552 601,353 825,656 1,184,001 1,660,665 5,339,704
Total SL8500 Cash Flow 768,600 50,976 346,146 471,871 648,495 905,874 3,191,962
Net Savings 178,877 69,576 255,207 353,785 535,506 754,791 2,147,742
Cumulative Net Savings 178,877 248,453 503,660 857,445 1,392,951 2,147,742

Oracle Confidential: Internal and Partner Use Only 18
Record Cost Savings, Efficiency and Reliability
StorageTek T10000C with StorageTek Libraries
IBM System Storage
TS3500 Tape Library
and TS1140
VS.
 Save 33% on total cost of ownership
 Save 3x on floor space
 Save 4x on library power
 Highest availability with redundant
and hot-swappable robotics and
electronics

Library Pricing
2,500 slots vs. 2,000 slots
$237,797 $210,309
Drive Pricing
20 TS1140 vs. 20 T10000C
$859,900 $600,000
Media Pricing
2,500 3599 vs. 2,000 T2
$2,115,000 $1,260,000
Total List Pricing $4,219,632 $2,843,000
Savings 33%
Record Cost Savings with SL3000 & T10000C
10 PB Analysis

Save Space through Better Density
Floor Space Consumption to Store 10PB
Scale 1:60
StorageTek SL8500
with T10000C
103.2 TB / Sq Ft

Save 3x over IBM with SL3000 & T10000C
Save 1.6x over IBM with SL8500 & T10000C
IBM TS3500
with TS1140
63.8 TB / Sq Ft
IBM TS3500
with TS1140
63.8 TB / Sq Ft

SL3000 +
T10000C
223.7
TB / Sq Ft

21
ZFS STORAGE APPLIANCE
Sun ZFS Storage Appliances
Independent Study Confirms Simplified Management
Source: Edison Group Comparative Management Costs Study, 2010.
Faster to
provision
new storage
Faster in
administrative
tasks
Faster to
monitor and
troubleshoot
issues
36%36% 31%

Simplicity with Integrated Monitoring Tools
Both Oracle Secure Backup and the ZFS Storage Appliance
integrate into Enterprise Manager giving one single view of
health and resources in the environment reducing risk and
complexity.

Simplicity
It’s a delight to use. We spend less time reacting to the
performance of the system and more time planning and
supporting company strategy ...overall administration
time has fallen by 50%.
- Magnus Befwe, Manager of IT Operations and Infrastructure, Elanders, AB
In 11 years of managing storage arrays, I've never had so
much detailed information about exactly what is going on
inside the storage system aside from how many IOPS.
I've worked with almost all of the big names on some very
high-end systems (EMC Symmetrix and Clariion, Hitachi
9900, NetApp and StorageTek) and DTrace Analytics is
several orders of magnitude better than any other
storage management software or debugging tool I've
ever worked with.
- David Robillard - UNIX team leader & Oracle DBA, Notarius
Customers agree

Speed & Reduced Risk
Data Protection is all about reducing risk
• According to ESG 2008, 1 in 6 (17%) of restores fail. This can be
attributed, in large part, to lengthy recoveries requiring several “shifts”
to complete.
• ZFS 7420C has recovery throughput to effectively accommodate
recoveries in as little as 5 hours for DB’s up to 35TB
• Optimize system availability with predictive self-healing features
and a Fault Management Architecture that automatically detects
and diagnoses underlying problems
• ZFS checksumming compliments RMAN block error detection to
ensure successful restores

Data Protection for Oracle Value Prop
Speed
Exadata for the most demanding RPO/RTO
Backup up to 18TB/hr (full rack), 20-50TB/hr for incrementals
Restore 18-24 TB/hr (full rack)
ZFS Storage Appliance Beats NetApp and EMC Data
Domain!
Over 3x the backup throughput of NetApp FAS3170C
Up to 2x the restore throughput of NetApp
Over 3x the backup throughput of Data Domain 880
Over 4x the restore throughput of DD
T10000C Beats IBM!
25% greater capacity, 33% lower TCO, and 50% less floor
space than IBM TS1140

Spotting Opportunities
Horizontal Issues Vertical Industries
Primary
Opportunities
 Recent failed backup
and/or restore
 Not meeting SLA for backup
and restore (can't backup or
restore within given
timeframe).
 Advanced Compression user
 Financial Services
 Telco
 Healthcare
 Manufacturing
 Government
Secondary
Opportunities
 Catalyst event: datacenter
refresh, consolidation, new
app deployment or upgrade,
server virtualization
 Tape replacement initiative
 Pending license renewal for
3rd party BU&R application

Exploratory Questions
• How many DB’s are to be protected?
• What are their sizes?
• Do they all have the same RTO (Recovery Time
Objective)? If not, which have more/less stringent RTO’s?
• Are you achieving this RTO now?

29
Maximizing Revenue Opportunities
Core
Feature these
products for
BU&R; use as
wedge for add-on
business
Extend
Upsell BU&R
deals with these
products
Comprehensive
Creatively leverage
additional revenue
outside of BU&R
ZFS 7420C*, SL3000,
SL8500, T10000C
plus Premier support
Migration
services
Educational
services
Capacity
Upgrades
Database version
support: Standby,
Development, Q/A
Test, Reporting,
Training, etc.
Backup support for DB-related apps:
Email, ERP, CRM, SCM, DSS,
Virtualization etc.
ACS
implementation
services
* Utilize the Unified Storage
simulator
for a winning demonstrations
of unique system capabilities.

30
Oracle Premier Support for Systems
How it Helps Customers Maintain a Rock-Solid Infrastructure Foundation
for Their Business Applications
• Prevention
 Access to online resources and facilitated community forums
 Patch/update recommendations and alerts
 Configuration snapshot and analysis tools
• Rapid Resolution
 Global knowledgebase: Likely the answer to the question already exists
 Direct, 24/7 access to the technology experts. Software/firmware patches.
 System-initiated service requests and 2hr hardware service when you need it
• Product Enhancements
 Operating System (Oracle Solaris or Oracle Linux)
 Oracle VM
 Oracle System Firmware

31
Advanced Customer Services
Helping You Achieve the Highest Level of
Operational Excellence
Personalized, annualized
support services for complex,
mission critical IT environments
• Customized IT lifecycle solutions
to solve unique challenges
• Operations management to
efficiently manage your IT
infrastructure
• Proven best practices and
flexible approach
*Europe’s leading Blue-chip index for the Eurozone
94% of the “S&P Global 100” companies
94% of the Dow Jones STOXX 50*
78% of the global Fortune 100 companies
5 of the top 5 telecommunications
companies
9 of the top 10 global banks
4 of the top 5 aerospace and defense
companies
…and hundreds of small- and mid-size
companies around the world
Companies that rely on
ORACLE ADVANCED
CUSTOMER SERVICES:

32
Services for Storage Products
Product Oracle ACS Service Feature Benefit Services Field
Contact
Sun Storage 7000
Unified Storage
System
Oracle System
Installation
Comprehensive system
installation performed by server
and storage experts using
proven, standardized installation
methodology.
Cost-effective system
installation performed by
experienced engineers
reduces technology
adoption risk
NAMER: Jess Moore
Team
JPAC: Greg Richards
Team
EMEA: Stephane Pate
Team
Expert Services:
Storage Optimization
Encryption Optimization, Data
Protection Optimization,
Server/Storage Optimization
Helps efficiently manage
data growth in the most cost
effective manner. Learn to
apply the right level of IT
investment to data based on
the data’s value to the
organization.
NAMER: Jess Moore
Team
JPAC: Greg Richards
Team
EMEA: Stephane Pate
Team
Oracle iRunbook iRunbook creates a knowledge
base of vital data center
information utilizing the latest
Oracle preferred operational
management advice from a
central source.
Improve SLA performance
with Oracle preferred
practice procedures, which
help improve efficiency and
reduce operational errors
NAMER: Jess Moore
Team
JPAC: Greg Richards
Team
EMEA: Stephane Pate
Team
Operations
Management:
• Back up monitoring
and management
Remote and onsite options. Disk
and volume management
services that deliver against
SLAs for capacity, performance,
availability, recoverability and
security. Service can include
back up and restore services that
deliver SLA based data
protection.
Gain significant reduction in
back up costs.
Reduce risks and make IT
operations costs predictable.
Accelerate time-to-value
through ITIL based best
practices. More productive
use of IT staff and resources.
NAMER: Jess Moore
Team
JPAC: Greg Richards
Team
EMEA: Stephane Pate
Team

33
Oracle University
Superior Training That Enhances the
Adoption of Oracle Technologies
Flexible options to learn in a
classroom or virtually, to save
time and expense
• Training from the source for
unmatched accuracy and
relevance – created and taught in
collaboration with Oracle product
development teams
• Curriculum developed to match 9
key IT job roles
• Learning paths customized to
product focus areas
• Sun Storage 7000 Administration
(NWS-6425)
4,000+ course titles
120+ certification
credentials
867 worldwide
locations, 89 countries,
28 languages
2,500 global education
partnerships
WHY ORACLE UNIVERSITY

Competing Against NetApp
Strengths
• Storage Industry leader (#2 NAS
vendor) with loyal customer base
• Extensive application integration
• Strong Oracle partnership and
integration with Enterprise Manager,
Secure Backup, ASM, RMAN (“Easy
buttons” abound)
• Strong reseller channel and industry
vertical expertise.
Weaknesses
• Expensive HW, SW & maintenance costs:
Closed and proprietary enclosures and
ONTAP operating system limit ability to
leverage industry standard technology
• Limited backup and restore throughputs
(3.1TB/hr and 5.2TB/hr respectively for
3170C – OOW 2010)
Why Oracle Wins
• ZFS 7420C provides approximately 200% greater backup and restore throughput enabling
more stringent RTO requirements and backup window requirements.

Competing Against EMC Data Domain
Strengths
• Variable block dedupe is effective with
backups
• Deduped replication (optional)
• Compression included
• 3rd Party Integration
- Oracle RMAN, NBU (OST), EBS,
etc
Weaknesses
• Expensive
- DD880 48TB $460,000
• Replication extra
- DD880 $70,000
• Poor management tools
- No capacity planning; “all or nothing”
• Dedupe of Oracle DB’s ~6.3:1 w/RMAN
incrementals – some customers report
getting 5:1 w/ZFS compression (EMC Tech
doc H6835)
• Poor backup and restore throughput
(2.7TB/hr and 2.2TB/hr respectively for
DD880 – EMC Tech doc H6835)
Why Oracle Wins
• ZFS 7420C has greater than 200% more backup and restore throughput
than more costly DD880
• Advanced Storage Analytics: Planning/”what if” scenarios

Competing Against EMC Data Domain and NetApp
$-
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
DD880 FAS3170C ZFS 7420C
$/TB/hr
Based on TCO over 3 years and recovery throughput

Entry Midrange Large Enterprise
Oracle
IBM
TS3500
TS3310
TS3100 / TS3200
SL8500
SL3000
SL500
SL24/48
Oracle Tape Library Portfolio vs. IBM
SL24 / 48
TS3100 /
TS3200
Max Slots 24 / 48 24 / 48
Max Drives
1FH / 2FH
2HH / 4HH
1FH / 2FH
2HH / 4HH
SL500 TS3310
Max Slots 575 401
Max Drives 18 18
SL3000 TS3500
Max Slots 5,925 20,000 (LTO)
Max Drives 56 192
SL8500 TS3500
Max Slots 100,000 300,000 (LTO)
Max Drives 640 2,700
Oracle SL8500 Advantages
Scalability #1 in Factory-out Market Share for
>1,000 slot tape libraries
Performance 2.4x faster robotic performance
Up to 40x more parallel robotic
operations
Over 5x faster throughput*
Availability Only vendor with redundant and non-
disruptive robotics and electronics
Eco-Savings Save up to 5x on floor space*
2x power savings
* Advantage with T10000C

SL8500 Comparison Summary
Benefit Feature StorageTek SL8500 IBM TS3500
Manage
Growth
Scalability 100,000 Slots
640 Drives
300,000 LTO
225,000 Enterprise
2,700 Drives
Non-Disruptive Growth
including Connecting
Libraries
 X
Capacity on Demand  X
Limited to Base, HD Frames
Robotic Performance
(6,000 slots) 900 EPH 600 EPH
Reduce Costs
Seamless Mixed Media  X
Dedicated Frames
Library Power Consumption
(64 drive slots – max continuous watts) 320 735
Floor Space (6,000 slots) 140.6 Sq Ft
201.2 Sq Ft
(All HD Frames)
Max Density (20 PB) 174.8 TB/Sq Ft 52.8 TB/Sq Ft
Increase
Availability
Redundant and Hot-
swappable Library Electronics  X
Non-disruptive Redundant
Robotics  X
Service requires downtime
Quad-Redundant and
Hot-Swappable  X

• RealTime Growth:
add capacity and/or
performance without
disruption by hot-attaching
pass-through ports to
connect libraries
• Capacity on Demand: 250
/ 500 slot increments vs.
TS3500 in base/HD frame
• Mixed Media:
TS3500 requires dedicated
frames to each media type
MANAGE GROWTH
• Any Cartridge Any Slot
Technology: seamless
mixed media and drive
support
• Partitioning: TS3500 does
not allow mixed media
• Power: fewer AC drops, up
to 3x savings
• Floor Space: up to 2x
savings
• Up to 2.4x faster robotic
performance
REDUCE COSTS MINIMIZE RISK
SL8500 Key Advantages over IBM T3500
TS3500
64 – 20,087 LTO / Lib
58 – 15,260 Ent / Lib
1 - 192 Tape Drives
Connect up to 15 libraries
Up to 224 I/E Slots)
Oracle Differentiator
SL8500
1448 - 100,000 Slots
1 - 640 Tape Drives
39 to 78 CAP Slots /
library
up to 780 in complex
• Non-Disruptive Redundant
Robotics & Electronics:
includes servicing non-
disruptively
• Control Path: TS3500 has
no dedicated control path
• Cartridge handling: grab &
lift vs. hook & drag (less
wear on cartridges)
• OKM Encryption: more
robust enterprise-class
solution

Solution Description
• The solution leverages ZFS Storage appliance 7420 and Oracle Tape
to simplify and shorten the process for Oracle database backup and
recovery while providing outstanding value
• Potential deployment scenarios
Scenario 1: Database resides on any primary storage with “quasi” D2D2T utilizing Secure
Backup
Scenario 2: Database resides on any primary storage. ZFS Storage is added as a target
for RMAN then replicated via ZFS replication to another ZFS Storage appliance for both
DR and Development, Test, QA, and such purposes. ZFS Storage may be backed up
to tape at either site.
Scenario 3: Database resides on any primary storage. Data Guard is used to
synchronously replicate database to DR site. DR site is backed up via D2D2T using
ZFSSA and StorageTek tape.

Oracle Confidential: Internal and Partners ONLY
Scenario 1: Pros and Cons
Pros
• Quick restores and backups
• Preserve “versions” on tape
• Leverage existing tape
infrastructure
• RMAN aware backups on tape:
BACKUP BACKUPSET
• Recovery from tape 1 step
process
• Lower TCO for long term storage
• Compliments RMAN corruption
detection with ZFS
checksumming and self healing
Cons
• Additional load on DB servers for
backup to tape
• Control of backup could be given
to 3rd party backup vendor
• Not true D2D2T
- RMAN catalogs and pushes
backup to tape via media
management app

Scenario 2
RMAN
Data Guard Replication

Scenario 2: Pros & Cons
Pros
• Leverage included Data Guard
(Enterprise Edition customers)
• Fast backup/restore
- Backup to disk at up to 9TB/hr
- Restore from disk at up to 7TB/hr
• Easier to increase value of DP
copies with ZFSSA data
services
- Snaps/clones for Test,
Dev, QA, training, etc
Cons
• Some restores will need both
Solaris and database skill sets.
(Solaris more for NFS)
• ZFS replication is
asynchronous. Sync replication
may be required for certain
business continuance
environments

Scenario 3
RMAN
ZFS Replication

Scenario 3: Pros & Cons
Pros
• Enhanced DR with remote site
- Best for Standard Edition
environments (no Data Guard)
• Utilizes data services
included with ZFSSA
• Fast backup/restore
- Backup to disk at up to 9TB/hr
- Restore from disk at up to 7TB/hr
• Easier to increase value of DP
copies with ZFSSA data
services
- Snaps/clones for Test,
Dev, QA, training, etc
Cons
• Some restores will need both
Solaris and database skill sets.
(Solaris more for NFS)
• ZFS replication is
asynchronous. Sync replication
may be required for certain
business continuance
environments

Configuration Notes
• 7420C
- Each head: 2x8-core sockets, 128GB DRAM, Read SSD’s
optional (not required)
• 2-8 disk trays
- 1st tray has 4 Write SSD’s & 20 HDD’s
- Additional trays have 24 HDD’s
- RAID Z, RAID Z2, RAID 1
- Throughputs may vary with RAID level and client
configuration/tuning

General Considerations*
• Recommendations
- Prioritize sizing for RTO over capacity and backup window
- Most restore errors arise because the restore occurs over 2 or
more shifts. Recommend RTO’s of 5 hours or less
- In 11g environments:
• Leverage RMAN incrementally updated backups
• Snapshot after incremental merge for versioning
• Use ZFS compression for RMAN incremental merge backup
images
- In 10g environments:
• Use RMAN compression for backup
* See Resources slide for links to more detailed sizing/configuration information

Agenda
• Solution Overview: Data Protection for Oracle
Database environments
• Competition
• Resources

US Cellular
Infrastructure
X4800
Oracle RAC
11gR2
SpeedRDB
M5000
Oracle 10g
NTP
M5000
Oracle 10g
DRGlob2
EMC
Clariion
Cisco FC
Switch
X4800
Oracle RAC
11gR2
SpeedRDB
M5000
Oracle 10g
NTP
M5000
Oracle 10g
DRGlob2
Cisco Nexus
7420 280 TB Raw
1 Pool
Existing
POV

US Cellular
Summary
• Server feed rates are the bottleneck
• 7420 is 85% idle at 2.160 TB/Hour ingest
• Better than anticipated compression ratio of Speed
(2.88 actual, 2.0 anticipated - using LZJB)
Competition did not achieve any data deduplication so their
initial solution would not meet the storage requirements without
adding significant additional storage at a much higher cost.

US Cellular
Why we won
• Lower TCO
• H/A configuration
• Red Stack Integration – ability to tap Server experts,
Solaris experts, DB experts, RMAN experts, Storage
experts….Competition doesn’t have that reach!
• Flexibility to add additional protocols
• Analytics and ease-of-use

Customer Example
North American Energy and Utility Company
• Business need
• Economical means to support Oracle Database BU&R using RMAN
• Business results
• By leveraging Data Services included with S7210 as target in D2D environment,
immediately saved $250K by not having pay for software license renewals
• Leveraged Storage Analytics insights to improve management efficiency
• Overall: Reduced TCO costs; increased utility, performance and usable capacity
• Customer reaction
• “...as soon as the storage arrived onsite a couple weeks ago we racked it - installed
the latest software - and moved it to our DR site all configured. We have already
migrated a bunch of data...and backups are already running to it from production.
From installation to implementation - very smooth with no current issues.”

Customer Example
Global Computing and Communication Services Co-op
• Business need
• More efficient means to backup core PeopleSoft application
and its corresponding Oracle database using RMAN
in an NetBackup (NBU) environment
• Business results
• Using S7210 as RMAN backup target, achieved 30% increase
in throughput over previous solution
• Customer is in process adding 6 more databases to the system

Sales Resources
• RMAN Best Practices
- Oracle Database Backup and Recovery Best Practices & New Features
- Recovery Manager (RMAN) Configuration and Perfromance Tuning Best Practices
- VLDB Backup & Recovery Best Practices
More available on database.us.oracle.com:
Collateral tab > Sub Area contains “Backup and Recovery”

Sales Resources
• Tools
- Value Navigator: http://tools-insight.oraclecorp.com/
- ZFSSA simulator
• Collateral
- Unified Storage on my.oracle
- Tape on my.oracle
- White papers, MAA Guides, Implementation Guides
• Web and Online Communities
- ZFS_STORAGE_WW@oracle.com (internal)
- Unified Storage Forum: http://myforums.oracle.com/jive3/forum.jspa?forumID=4430
(internal)
- Oracle.com: http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/storage/unified-
storage/index.html

D2D2T (Disk-to-Disk-to-Tape) is a tiered storage methodology
that combines the speed of disk with the economy, security
and flexibility of tape for 'best of both worlds' data protection
and restoration
• Enables creation of a storage hierarchy that balances storage cost and
performance with SLAs and the value of applications being protected
• Reduces the limitations that can result when tape or disk
are used individually
• Backup data is automatically copied from the primary server disk to a
second storage disk array and then, as appropriate, streamed to tertiary
tape - all achieved without impacting production
• D2D2T is enabled by 3rd party BU&R apps such as NetBackup and
Enterprise Business Suite which work in conjunction with Oracle RMAN
ZFS Storage Appliance for Oracle Data Protection
What is D2D2T?

Advantages of Disk to Disk to Tape
Easier to coordinate backup schedules
• Tape backups run 24x7 to maximize use of tape drives
• Database backups run during off-peak for each DB
Restores don’t conflict with backups
• Don’t need to STOP backup of one database to restore another
• Usually restore from disk, so tape allocation isn’t necessary
Simplifies division of responsibilities
• Tape resources managed by System/Storage Admin
• Database backup/recovery process managed by DBA team

• Built-in component (no separate
license) of Oracle database since 8.0
• Command-line and Enterprise
Manager-based utility; Oracle-preferred
method for backing up and recovering
an Oracle database
• Oracle estimates ~70-80% of their
database customers use RMAN
• In D2D environment, RMAN can be
used without 3rd party BU&R software
(NBU, EBS, etc.)
• If tape is incorporated (D2D2T), RMAN
can (and should) be leveraged by 3rd
party BU&R application via their Oracle
database extension.
ZFS Storage Appliance for Oracle Data Protection
What is RMAN?
Oracle Recovery Manager (RMAN)

Data protection for oracle backup &amp; recovery for oracle databases

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to Data protection for oracle backup &amp; recovery for oracle databases

More from solarisyougood

Recently uploaded

Data protection for oracle backup &amp; recovery for oracle databases

Data protection for oracle backup & recovery for oracle databases

Similar to Data protection for oracle backup & recovery for oracle databases

Data protection for oracle backup & recovery for oracle databases