Critical Evaluation Essay

critical evaluation Essay
Professor English 102 Critical Evaluation Essay: A Petition to the President of the United States
The atomic bombs that were dropped on Japan in 1945 were not seen as a logical reaction to the
war by everyone. Leo Szilard was a Hungarian physicist that was the first to conceive of the
mechanics of the atomic bomb, and how it worked. He was fighting the use of these bombs on
Japan, and trying to urge the President to reconsider the idea. Although he lost the argument over
whether to use the bombs, his argument was valid based on the devastation that was caused by the
atomic bombs in Japan. Given the results of the devastation in Japan, his side of the argument is
unmistakably seen. One great contribution the...show more content...
He went into the dangers that would be caused by the use of the bombs, and that they would only
cause "ruthless annihilation and irreversible devastation ." Szilard believed that Japan should have
the chance to surrender before that tragedy that would be caused from an attack like this was
imposed on them. He believed that after given the chance to surrender, if Japan still chose the ladder
by not surrendering, then an attack involving an atomic bomb could be discussed . President
Truman authorized the use of atomic bombs on Japan. Leo Szilard's argument over the use of the
atomic bomb on Japan is justified. The destruction that was caused by these highly destructive
bombs was detrimental to the country. The effects of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki are still being seen today. Szilard lost this argument because President Truman still went
ahead with the use of the A–bomb on Japan. Was he wrong about the devastation that was caused?
No he absolutely wasn't. Statistically, there were 140,000 immediate deaths from the bombs of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There are currently 352,550 individuals that qualify for healthcare
treatment under the A–bomb Victims Medical Care law of 1957. There were damaged buildings up
to 2.3 kilometers from ground zero, and radiation exposure up to 500 meters from ground zero. The
radiation exposure was considered fatal as well. After some time passed, the radiation exposure was
reaching distances of 3–5 kilometers from the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Critical Evaluation
PY1101 – Writing in Psychology
APA 6th Edition "HOW TO" GUIDE
In Psychology, we use the formatting guidelines as set out in the Publication Manual of the
American Psychological Association (APA), 6th Edition. This is a starter guide to the APA
formatting guidelines. This guide is not all–inclusive, but will help get you started for your first
assignment. Burton's 'An interactive approach to writing essays and research reports in Psychology'
is the best guide to help you with APA formatting and referencing. There are other resources online
and in the library also.
Setting up the Format
You need to consider all aspects of the format of the document. The easiest thing to do is to adjust
your 'default' settings in Microsoft...show more content...
o Does the evidence support the argument? o Are the hypotheses proposed by the researchers
appropriate? o Are the arguments made by the researchers weak? Examine the research
methodology o Who were the participants in this study? o Does the research include a
representative sample? o How were the participants recruited for this study? o How was the study
conducted? Evaluate the results[1] o Are the results presented clearly? o Do the results support the
hypotheses made by the researchers? o Are the results interpreted with insight? Analyse the
conclusions/implications o Are the conclusions supported by the findings and other evidence? o Are
the conclusions logical or are they beyond the scope of the study?
Concluding paragraph: Synthesis of the findings form the critical evaluations. Draw a conclusions
from the evidence. Provide recommendations for future research.
References 1st Level Heading Starts on a new page Use APA style– no spaces between references,
hanging indent format, alphabetical order (by leading author surname), authors' initials only, no first
names Only include references actually cited in the report but make sure that you include ALL
sources cited in the report All sources MUST be cited in the text of the report where they are
referred to Secondary citations

Critical Evaluation
A Critical Evaluation of Three Different Methods for Treating Generalise Anxiety Disorder.
Anxiety Disorders are an extremely prevalent type of mental disorder that affect approximately 10%
of the population (Burton, Westen and Kowalski, 2015). One of the lesser–known Anxiety Disorders
is Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) affecting around 2% of the population (ABS, 2007d, as
cited in Burton, Westen & Kowalski, 2015). Stapinski, Abbot and Rapee (2010), define GAD as
"persistent anxiety at a moderate, but disturbing level [in addition to] unrealistic worry about life
circumstances" (as cited in Burton et al., 2015). Furthermore, GAD has been closely linked with
depression and a reduced life quality (Roemer, Orsillo & Salters–Pedneault, 2008)....show more
content...
Salzer et al. (2011) also noted that although the results of the study appeared to be in favour of
CBT treatment due to the small sample size the study was not well suited to an equivalence trial
leaving the study unable to draw definitive conclusions to one treatment being more effective than
the other. A secondary issue to the small sample size it that is also not possible to draw conclusions
on the effectiveness of STPP to the larger population. Further research on a larger sample is required
to confirm STPP effectiveness in within a larger sample group and to draw conclusions as to whether
one treatment was more effective than the

Essay about Critical Thinking: Evaluation
Critical Evaluation of an Academic Source Odetta Rodriguez Capella University Critical
Evaluation of an Academic Source This paper is a summary of critical evaluation of the suitability
of an article as an academic source. The title of the article is Critical Thinking: An Extended
Definition. The author, Professor Ken Petress, analyzes various definitions of critical thinking and
provides his definition of the concept as well. It is vitally important when performing research on a
topic that we completely understand the topic and that we can apply certain tests or questions to the
topic in order to determine its relevance and validity. Checklist for Critical Evaluation The...show
more content...
Conceptual Foundation What are the main concepts presented in the article? What information is
the author using, and what is its relationship to the main issue? Does the information used appear
relevant, significant, valid, and sufficient for the conclusions being drawn? Do you have enough
information to determine whether the information is relevant, significant, and valid? The main
concepts presented in the article are the varying definitions of each author on the concept of critical
thinking. The information the author uses are definitions which are the opinions of varied authors
and are similar in foundation in that to apply critical thinking one must be able to identify a
problem, pose a question(s), provide valid supporting evidence, and come to a conclusion. Although
the author's definitions do not identify a problem, questions, evidence, or conclusions, the
relationship Petress (2004) shows is that the reader must apply this process themselves as it is not
always given. The information used does appear to be relevant, significant, and valid. The references
the author listed does provide enough information for me to come to this conclusion. Since this work
is a literature review and not a case study, numerical data are not necessary to determine validity of
the information. Author's

Critical Appraisal Essay
The purpose of this report is to conduct a critical appraisal of a published article.
Carnwell (1997) describes a critical appraisal as an unbiased and balanced
scrutiny of the research paper so that both its strengths and weaknesses are
highlighted. The focus of the appraisal with be on "Promoting the health of
people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; patients and their carer's
views" (Caress et al, 2010). The format of the appraisal will be formed around a
set of criteria (see appendix 1).
The journal looks at the views of patients and their carer's experiences with living
the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), its causes, how they manage
with the symptoms, its progression and what role...show more content...
Caress et al (2010) have included literature from as far
back as 1968. The literature does offer some epidemiology in relation to cause,
distribution and control of the disease with the population but there has been no
research literature put forward for discussion. There is also one journal included
titles "A descriptive study of meaning of illness in chronic renal disease" it could
be argued that this wasn't really relevant to the research being carried out.
There has also been no mention of family systems theory as this would have
been quite beneficial as it looks at the broader picture and takes into
consideration the impact that the disease has on other family members. This
could have supported the decision for including family members within the study.
Caress et al (2010) successfully obtained ethical approval; they state that

"Relevant ethical and institutional/governance was obtained" however there was
no mention of who the professional body was that approved them. Beauchamp
and Childress (2001) identify four fundamental principles in achieving ethical
approval, autonomy, non–maleficence, benefince and justice. Autonomy refers to
the individual's right to freely decide if they wish to participate without fear of
coercion, Greaney et al (2012) advise that it is also important to give potential
participants adequate time to freely decide if they

Essay On Critical Appraisal
I choose "Developing an Information Literacy Workshop to Improve Evidence–Based Practice
Among Nurse Practitioner Students" to summarize for this forum. The presentation was a discussion
presented by Antiqua Smart on a scholarly practice project study. The purpose of the study was to
develop and implement a workshop to improve Nurse Practitioner (NP) students in critical appraisal
skills and clinical decision–making skills in support of Evidence Bases Practice (EBP) during
clinical practicum experience and beyond (Smart, 2014). After reviewing the supporting literature for
her study, the method was discussed in which sample of 20 NP students participated. The method of
data collection included the use of pre and posttest surveys after attending a workshop. The
workshop was over four hours that included topics such as Information Literature,...show more
content...
I thought I had a good concept on the process of appraisal. However, after receiving feedback from
our recent assignment, I need to sharpen these skills. Critical Appraisal is a skill set that requires
practice to efficiently appraise the literature. Smart reviewed a rapid appraisal process that is not
for the novice learner of the process. Looking back over the assignment, I can say that I fell into
the rapid appraisal process attempting to move forward through the course in a timely manner.
As I go back to the search for a different article, I will take away from the webinar refreshed
processes. Regarding, how I will use in clinical practice, is sharpening my skills in actually
completely Critical Appraisal. As I mentioned above, the Critical Appraisal process take time to
develop the skills. A workshop such as Smart's study would be a valuable tool in gaining the
knowledge. Our research course as provided a great deal of knowledge, but to truly be effective in
using EBP, one must continue to further strengthen and gain further

Critical Evaluation Essay
Arrington 1 Karen Arrington English Katherine Oneil 22 July 2012 CRITICAL EVALUATION
ESSAY Introduction In W.E.B. Du Bois' "Of Mr. Booker T. Washington and Others," Du Bois
criticized Washington's policy of racial accommodation and gradualism. Du Bois rejected the latter's
willingness to avoid messing with the racial issues and pushed for his views on political power, the
continuance of the civil rights fight, and higher education for all the Negro youth. Washington
emphasized that education should be attained in order to get real jobs and played down on seeking
equality...show more content...
His controversial opinions and assertions about race and politics made him a controversial figure.
He totally disagrees with Washington whose recommendations of what the Negroes should be
and catapults the Black race into disfranchisement and inferiority (Du Bois, 1903). He saw and
lived in an American society where the Negroes were forced to abide by the dictates of the
Whites. His open conflict with Booker T. Washington on the role of the Negroes in American
society is the vehemently expressed in this essay that is part of the collection found in "The
Souls of Black Folk" (1903). This "twoness" that Du Bois points out in most of his works and
lectures are still considered to be prevalent even to this day. Conclusion While Booker T.
Washington views the Negro plight as a "racial uplift" is what W.E.B. Du Bois considered to be
out of this world because the latter realizes that the former's ideas was more conciliatory in nature
rather than for the best interests of the Black population in America. The strong disagreements of Du
Bois with most of Washington's opinions are more defined in this essay where the Du Bois heavily
criticized Washington's stance about civil rights issues. rivalry continued to spark interest among
other Negro leaders who believe that both have their own right to express how they see

critical evaluation essay
English 102 Effectiveness in Writing
September 18, 2014
Critical Evaluation Essay
"Now We Can Begin" an essay by Crystal Eastman is a very powerful essay. Eastman makes the
point know in her essay that an honest and true feminist no matter where she stands in the movement
she will see to the woman's fight with strength and courage and how it matters in the future and as
well as its difference in its approach for the workers fight for industrial freedom. Eastman state "In
fighting for the right to vote most women have tried to be either non–committal or thoroughly
respectable on every other subject. Now they can say what they are really after; and what they are
after, in common with all the rest of the struggling world, is freedom"...show more content...
During that same time Elizabeth Cady Stanton was head of the Women's Rights Convention in New
York. It was with much time and effort put into many conferences that the amendment which gave
the women the right to vote was written by Susan Anthony, but the amendment was not passed
and made law until 1920. During this time is when Crystal Eastman started stating her views and
ideas of what she would like to happen. Eastman was there first hand to see that women did not
have any rights during her short life so the having the Eastman writing this article is a very
valuable trustworthy source as an activist for women's rights. Crystal Eastman wanted to see
change this is obvious seeing how she helped found the International League for Peace and
Freedom this group was previously named the Woman's Peace Party Crystal Eastman served as
president of this organization. Eastman states how grateful she is that the law was passed that
gave women the right to vote but, that is not all she expressed that she wanted more. East writes
this essay playing on the emotions and logical thinking of her audience. Eastman states "Freedom
of choice in occupation and individual economic independence for women: How shall we
approach this next feminist objective? First, by breaking down all remaining barriers, actual as
well as legal, which make it difficult for women to enter or succeed in the various professions, to go
into and get on in business, to learn trades and

Critical Evaluation Essay

More Related Content

Similar to Critical Evaluation Essay

More from Paper Writer Services

Recently uploaded

Critical Evaluation Essay