Single-subject experimental research involves studying the effect of an intervention on a single subject over time through repeated measurements. It is useful for clinical research like behavior modification and drug evaluation. The key aspects of single-subject design include establishing a stable baseline, introducing an intervention or manipulating variable, and taking repeated measurements of the target behavior under standardized conditions. Common basic designs are withdrawal, reversal, and multiple baseline designs which help evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention. Both overt and covert behaviors can be measured, and data is typically evaluated through visual inspection rather than statistics. Strengths include control of extraneous variables and ability to concentrate on one subject, while weaknesses include lack of generalizability and potential order effects.
Single-subject research involves intensively studying a small number of participants to focus on individual behavior over time. It has been used in psychology since its beginnings. Some key features include repeatedly measuring a dependent variable under different conditions designated by letters (e.g. A, B, C). Researchers wait for steady responding before changing conditions. Common designs are reversal/ABA designs where a baseline is compared to a treatment condition, and multiple-baseline designs where the treatment is introduced at different times across subjects, behaviors, or settings. Data is typically graphed and analyzed visually for changes in level, trend or latency. Advantages include flexibility, ability to see quick effects of treatments, and strong conclusions about variable control. Disadvantages include
Single subject experimental design (SSED) is a research methodology that focuses on measuring the effect of an intervention on a single subject or small group of subjects. It involves repeated measurement of a dependent variable during a baseline phase without intervention and a treatment phase with the introduction of an intervention. Common SSED types include basic A-B designs, withdrawal A-B-A designs, multiple treatment designs, and multiple baseline designs. Data is typically graphed and analyzed visually to determine if changes in level, trend, or variability correspond to the introduction of an intervention. SSED allows for testing interventions on individuals and can provide evidence of the effectiveness of clinical treatments.
Single-group design involves administering a treatment to a group and measuring the effects, without a control group. It requires continuous assessment before, during, and after intervention to measure variability in responses. Advantages include ease of implementation and illustrating dramatic changes, while disadvantages are lack of controls and limited application. Common single-subject designs include AB, withdrawal, multiple baseline, changing criterion, and multiple probe designs.
The alternating treatments design compares the effects of two or more treatments on a behavior. It answers which treatment is more effective in changing a behavior. Treatments are alternated rapidly to evaluate their relative effects. There are three common variations: with no baseline, baseline followed by alternating treatments, and baseline followed by alternating treatments and a final treatment phase. It is used when determining the relative effectiveness of multiple treatments and baseline data is unavailable or unstable. Disadvantages include a lack of control for extraneous variables and an inability to assess absolute treatment effects.
This document discusses threats to research validity, including threats to construct validity such as participant reactivity and experimenter effects. It also discusses threats to internal validity like history, maturation, instrumentation, testing, regression, attrition, and selection that can influence the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. The document concludes by describing threats to external validity including population, ecological, treatment, outcome, and temporal validity that limit how generalizable the results are to other populations, settings, treatments, and time periods.
Small N research involves studying individual subjects to gain a deeper understanding of individual differences compared to group analysis. It uses experimental single-subject designs where the subject acts as their own control to establish a pattern of behavior and observe how that pattern changes when an intervention is introduced. Common small N designs include the simple AB design with a baseline and intervention phase, reversal designs like ABA to introduce baseline periods again, and multiple baseline designs that stagger the introduction of an intervention across subjects to control for external factors.
Single-subject research involves intensively studying a small number of participants to focus on individual behavior over time. It has been used in psychology since its beginnings. Some key features include repeatedly measuring a dependent variable under different conditions designated by letters (e.g. A, B, C). Researchers wait for steady responding before changing conditions. Common designs are reversal/ABA designs where a baseline is compared to a treatment condition, and multiple-baseline designs where the treatment is introduced at different times across subjects, behaviors, or settings. Data is typically graphed and analyzed visually for changes in level, trend or latency. Advantages include flexibility, ability to see quick effects of treatments, and strong conclusions about variable control. Disadvantages include
Single subject experimental design (SSED) is a research methodology that focuses on measuring the effect of an intervention on a single subject or small group of subjects. It involves repeated measurement of a dependent variable during a baseline phase without intervention and a treatment phase with the introduction of an intervention. Common SSED types include basic A-B designs, withdrawal A-B-A designs, multiple treatment designs, and multiple baseline designs. Data is typically graphed and analyzed visually to determine if changes in level, trend, or variability correspond to the introduction of an intervention. SSED allows for testing interventions on individuals and can provide evidence of the effectiveness of clinical treatments.
Single-group design involves administering a treatment to a group and measuring the effects, without a control group. It requires continuous assessment before, during, and after intervention to measure variability in responses. Advantages include ease of implementation and illustrating dramatic changes, while disadvantages are lack of controls and limited application. Common single-subject designs include AB, withdrawal, multiple baseline, changing criterion, and multiple probe designs.
The alternating treatments design compares the effects of two or more treatments on a behavior. It answers which treatment is more effective in changing a behavior. Treatments are alternated rapidly to evaluate their relative effects. There are three common variations: with no baseline, baseline followed by alternating treatments, and baseline followed by alternating treatments and a final treatment phase. It is used when determining the relative effectiveness of multiple treatments and baseline data is unavailable or unstable. Disadvantages include a lack of control for extraneous variables and an inability to assess absolute treatment effects.
This document discusses threats to research validity, including threats to construct validity such as participant reactivity and experimenter effects. It also discusses threats to internal validity like history, maturation, instrumentation, testing, regression, attrition, and selection that can influence the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. The document concludes by describing threats to external validity including population, ecological, treatment, outcome, and temporal validity that limit how generalizable the results are to other populations, settings, treatments, and time periods.
Small N research involves studying individual subjects to gain a deeper understanding of individual differences compared to group analysis. It uses experimental single-subject designs where the subject acts as their own control to establish a pattern of behavior and observe how that pattern changes when an intervention is introduced. Common small N designs include the simple AB design with a baseline and intervention phase, reversal designs like ABA to introduce baseline periods again, and multiple baseline designs that stagger the introduction of an intervention across subjects to control for external factors.
Response of Watermelon to Five Different Rates of Poultry Manure in Asaba Are...IOSR Journals
The document discusses experimental research designs, specifically pretest-posttest designs. It begins by explaining true experimental designs that use control and experimental groups, with pretests and posttests to both groups.
It then discusses different pretest-posttest designs in more detail, including Solomon four group designs. The Solomon four group design involves four groups - two groups that receive a pretest and posttest, one that only receives a posttest, and one that only receives a pretest.
The document provides an example of how pretest-posttest designs could be used to study the effects of fertilizers in agriculture. It evaluates the internal and external validity of different experimental designs and their ability to control for confounding variables
This document discusses key aspects of single-subject research designs, including ABAB and multiple baseline designs. ABAB designs involve measuring a target behavior across baseline and intervention phases, allowing for inferences about causality. Multiple baseline designs demonstrate causality by applying an intervention to different targets, participants, or settings only when behavior changes, establishing the intervention as the cause. Both designs require stable baselines, marked changes during interventions, and replication to demonstrate internal and external validity.
The design of experiments (DOE, DOX, or experimental design) is the design of any task that aims to describe and explain the variation of information under conditions that are hypothesized to reflect the variation.
The term is generally associated with experiments in which the design introduces conditions that directly affect the variation, but may also refer to the design of quasi-experiments, in which natural conditions that influence the variation are selected for observation.
In its simplest form, an experiment aims at predicting the outcome by introducing a change of the preconditions, which is represented by one or more independent variables, also referred to as "input variables" or "predictor variables."
The change in one or more independent variables is generally hypothesized to result in a change in one or more dependent variables, also referred to as "output variables" or "response variables."
This document discusses different types of variables and research designs. It defines constructs, indicators, and operational definitions. It also describes different types of variables like independent, dependent, attribute and extraneous variables. Finally, it explains quasi-experimental designs like non-equivalent groups, interrupted time series, and regression discontinuity designs. It also covers single-case designs like A-B-A, multiple baseline, and changing criterion designs. The document provides examples and diagrams to illustrate these research concepts and designs.
This document discusses single subject research design. It defines single subject design and describes its key characteristics. These include having only one independent variable changed at a time between baseline and intervention conditions. The length of conditions and number of data points in each is important to establish trends. Graphs demonstrate how degree and speed of change between conditions and a return to baseline levels impact internal validity. The number of baselines in a multiple baseline design also influences conclusions that can be drawn. Replication across subjects is important to strengthen external validity of single subject findings.
Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure. There are several types of reliability: test-retest, equivalency, inter-rater, and internal consistency. Test-retest reliability assesses consistency over time, equivalency assesses consistency between alternate forms, inter-rater assesses consistency between raters, and internal consistency assesses consistency between items. Factors like memory, practice effects, and maturation can impact reliability over time. Reliability is important for a measure to be valid and useful. Ways to improve reliability include making tests longer, carefully constructing items, and standardizing administration procedures.
The document discusses different types of evaluation designs:
1) Concurrent evaluation occurs simultaneously with project implementation and provides continuous feedback.
2) Periodic evaluation is conducted after set intervals or phases of a project/program.
3) Terminal evaluation assesses overall achievement and is only done after a project/program is completed.
It also outlines causal designs which attempt to determine cause-and-effect relationships between variables. Experimental designs manipulate independent variables to measure their impact on dependent variables. Cross-sectional designs study sample populations through field studies or surveys.
The document discusses experimental design principles for user experience research. It describes how experiments are conducted to test hypotheses and theories by manipulating independent variables and observing their effects on dependent variables. Different experimental designs are discussed, including between-subjects, within-subjects, and mixed designs. Key factors to consider in experimental design are identified, such as controlling confounding variables, minimizing carry-over effects, and appropriately selecting and assigning subjects to conditions.
This document describes three experimental research designs: three-group design, parallel-group design, and counterbalanced or Latin square design. The three-group design involves three independent variable groups. The parallel-group design consists of a control group and two or more experimental groups that are compared to the control. The counterbalanced or Latin square design rotates treatments among subjects in a systematic way so that each treatment occurs in each position an equal number of times. Examples are provided to illustrate how each design could be applied.
The document discusses the concepts of validity and reliability in research. It defines validity as the degree of accuracy and appropriateness of a study in measuring what it intends to measure. There are three main types of validity: content validity, face validity, and criterion validity. Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of results over time. The four main types of reliability are equivalency, stability, internal consistency, and interrater reliability. Basic statistical concepts like the mean, variance, and standard deviation are also covered.
There are three key research designs in psychology: [1] repeated measures design, [2] matched participants design, and [3] independent groups design. The repeated measures design exposes participants to both the experimental and control conditions to eliminate confounding variables but is time consuming. The matched participants design matches participants on a confounding variable to eliminate its effects but is very time consuming. The independent groups design randomly assigns participants to conditions and can be done quickly but requires a large number of participants.
This document discusses factors that affect language test scores and reliability. It defines reliability as the proportion of observed score variance due to true score variance. Reliability can be estimated using internal consistency, stability over time, and equivalence of alternate forms. Internal consistency examines consistency of performance across parts of a test and can be estimated using split-half reliability, which treats halves of a test as parallel forms.
This document discusses research design, which is the second important step in the research process after defining the research problem. It involves planning the methodology for collecting relevant data and determining the techniques that will be used. The key aspects of research design covered include definitions, the need for research design, features of a good design, aligning the design with the research problem/objective, important concepts, and different types of designs such as exploratory, descriptive, diagnostic, and hypothesis testing. Experimental designs like before-after, randomized control, and factorial designs are explained in detail along with their principles of replication, randomization, and local control.
This document discusses principles of experimental design. It covers the aims of experiments including developing new products or processes or improving existing ones. It discusses types of experiments and defines DOE (design of experiments). It outlines the phases of experimental design including treatment design, experiment design, and analysis design. It provides examples of treatment design objectives like screening, quantifying, optimization, and theory. It also discusses concepts like one-variable and two-way factorial experiments, experimental units, replicates, randomization, and analysis of variance.
This document discusses quasi-experimental research design. Quasi-experimental research involves manipulating an independent variable to observe its effects, but unlike true experiments, it lacks random assignment or a control group. The two main types discussed are non-randomized control group design, where groups are not randomly assigned but a control receives no treatment, and time series design, where a treatment is applied and removed over multiple time periods to a small group. Quasi-experimental designs are more practical than true experiments when randomization is not possible but allow evaluation of treatment effects under natural conditions.
This document discusses factors that can threaten the internal and external validity of experimental research designs. It identifies six main threats to internal validity: history effects, maturation effects, instrumentation effects, selection bias, statistical regression, and mortality. It also discusses how randomization and matching groups can help control for contaminating variables. The trade-off between internal and external validity is addressed, as well as types of experimental designs, simulation as an alternative, and ethical issues.
Scales are tools used to measure how individuals differ on variables of interest. There are four main types of scales: nominal scales assign subjects to categories, ordinal scales denote differences and rank categories, interval scales allow arithmetic operations on data, and ratio scales measure magnitude and proportions of differences. Examples provided include using Likert scales to rate agreement, ranking apps, and comparing boys and girls in a ratio. Various other scale types were also outlined such as dichotomous, category, semantic differential, numerical, Stapel, graphic rating, and forced choice scales. The presentation concluded with describing measures of central tendency and dispersion that correspond to each scale type, along with some common tests of significance.
The document discusses the meaning, objectives, characteristics, types, and steps of research. It defines research as a systematic, directed search for knowledge. The main objectives of research are to gain new insights or accurately describe characteristics. Research is characterized by careful investigation and testing of conclusions. The main types discussed are descriptive, analytical, applied, fundamental, quantitative, and qualitative research. Key steps include formulating the problem, reviewing literature, developing hypotheses, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting findings. Research design involves determining what, why, where, when of a study. It is important for testing hypotheses and controlling for extraneous variables.
Response of Watermelon to Five Different Rates of Poultry Manure in Asaba Are...IOSR Journals
The document discusses experimental research designs, specifically pretest-posttest designs. It begins by explaining true experimental designs that use control and experimental groups, with pretests and posttests to both groups.
It then discusses different pretest-posttest designs in more detail, including Solomon four group designs. The Solomon four group design involves four groups - two groups that receive a pretest and posttest, one that only receives a posttest, and one that only receives a pretest.
The document provides an example of how pretest-posttest designs could be used to study the effects of fertilizers in agriculture. It evaluates the internal and external validity of different experimental designs and their ability to control for confounding variables
This document discusses key aspects of single-subject research designs, including ABAB and multiple baseline designs. ABAB designs involve measuring a target behavior across baseline and intervention phases, allowing for inferences about causality. Multiple baseline designs demonstrate causality by applying an intervention to different targets, participants, or settings only when behavior changes, establishing the intervention as the cause. Both designs require stable baselines, marked changes during interventions, and replication to demonstrate internal and external validity.
The design of experiments (DOE, DOX, or experimental design) is the design of any task that aims to describe and explain the variation of information under conditions that are hypothesized to reflect the variation.
The term is generally associated with experiments in which the design introduces conditions that directly affect the variation, but may also refer to the design of quasi-experiments, in which natural conditions that influence the variation are selected for observation.
In its simplest form, an experiment aims at predicting the outcome by introducing a change of the preconditions, which is represented by one or more independent variables, also referred to as "input variables" or "predictor variables."
The change in one or more independent variables is generally hypothesized to result in a change in one or more dependent variables, also referred to as "output variables" or "response variables."
This document discusses different types of variables and research designs. It defines constructs, indicators, and operational definitions. It also describes different types of variables like independent, dependent, attribute and extraneous variables. Finally, it explains quasi-experimental designs like non-equivalent groups, interrupted time series, and regression discontinuity designs. It also covers single-case designs like A-B-A, multiple baseline, and changing criterion designs. The document provides examples and diagrams to illustrate these research concepts and designs.
This document discusses single subject research design. It defines single subject design and describes its key characteristics. These include having only one independent variable changed at a time between baseline and intervention conditions. The length of conditions and number of data points in each is important to establish trends. Graphs demonstrate how degree and speed of change between conditions and a return to baseline levels impact internal validity. The number of baselines in a multiple baseline design also influences conclusions that can be drawn. Replication across subjects is important to strengthen external validity of single subject findings.
Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure. There are several types of reliability: test-retest, equivalency, inter-rater, and internal consistency. Test-retest reliability assesses consistency over time, equivalency assesses consistency between alternate forms, inter-rater assesses consistency between raters, and internal consistency assesses consistency between items. Factors like memory, practice effects, and maturation can impact reliability over time. Reliability is important for a measure to be valid and useful. Ways to improve reliability include making tests longer, carefully constructing items, and standardizing administration procedures.
The document discusses different types of evaluation designs:
1) Concurrent evaluation occurs simultaneously with project implementation and provides continuous feedback.
2) Periodic evaluation is conducted after set intervals or phases of a project/program.
3) Terminal evaluation assesses overall achievement and is only done after a project/program is completed.
It also outlines causal designs which attempt to determine cause-and-effect relationships between variables. Experimental designs manipulate independent variables to measure their impact on dependent variables. Cross-sectional designs study sample populations through field studies or surveys.
The document discusses experimental design principles for user experience research. It describes how experiments are conducted to test hypotheses and theories by manipulating independent variables and observing their effects on dependent variables. Different experimental designs are discussed, including between-subjects, within-subjects, and mixed designs. Key factors to consider in experimental design are identified, such as controlling confounding variables, minimizing carry-over effects, and appropriately selecting and assigning subjects to conditions.
This document describes three experimental research designs: three-group design, parallel-group design, and counterbalanced or Latin square design. The three-group design involves three independent variable groups. The parallel-group design consists of a control group and two or more experimental groups that are compared to the control. The counterbalanced or Latin square design rotates treatments among subjects in a systematic way so that each treatment occurs in each position an equal number of times. Examples are provided to illustrate how each design could be applied.
The document discusses the concepts of validity and reliability in research. It defines validity as the degree of accuracy and appropriateness of a study in measuring what it intends to measure. There are three main types of validity: content validity, face validity, and criterion validity. Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of results over time. The four main types of reliability are equivalency, stability, internal consistency, and interrater reliability. Basic statistical concepts like the mean, variance, and standard deviation are also covered.
There are three key research designs in psychology: [1] repeated measures design, [2] matched participants design, and [3] independent groups design. The repeated measures design exposes participants to both the experimental and control conditions to eliminate confounding variables but is time consuming. The matched participants design matches participants on a confounding variable to eliminate its effects but is very time consuming. The independent groups design randomly assigns participants to conditions and can be done quickly but requires a large number of participants.
This document discusses factors that affect language test scores and reliability. It defines reliability as the proportion of observed score variance due to true score variance. Reliability can be estimated using internal consistency, stability over time, and equivalence of alternate forms. Internal consistency examines consistency of performance across parts of a test and can be estimated using split-half reliability, which treats halves of a test as parallel forms.
This document discusses research design, which is the second important step in the research process after defining the research problem. It involves planning the methodology for collecting relevant data and determining the techniques that will be used. The key aspects of research design covered include definitions, the need for research design, features of a good design, aligning the design with the research problem/objective, important concepts, and different types of designs such as exploratory, descriptive, diagnostic, and hypothesis testing. Experimental designs like before-after, randomized control, and factorial designs are explained in detail along with their principles of replication, randomization, and local control.
This document discusses principles of experimental design. It covers the aims of experiments including developing new products or processes or improving existing ones. It discusses types of experiments and defines DOE (design of experiments). It outlines the phases of experimental design including treatment design, experiment design, and analysis design. It provides examples of treatment design objectives like screening, quantifying, optimization, and theory. It also discusses concepts like one-variable and two-way factorial experiments, experimental units, replicates, randomization, and analysis of variance.
This document discusses quasi-experimental research design. Quasi-experimental research involves manipulating an independent variable to observe its effects, but unlike true experiments, it lacks random assignment or a control group. The two main types discussed are non-randomized control group design, where groups are not randomly assigned but a control receives no treatment, and time series design, where a treatment is applied and removed over multiple time periods to a small group. Quasi-experimental designs are more practical than true experiments when randomization is not possible but allow evaluation of treatment effects under natural conditions.
This document discusses factors that can threaten the internal and external validity of experimental research designs. It identifies six main threats to internal validity: history effects, maturation effects, instrumentation effects, selection bias, statistical regression, and mortality. It also discusses how randomization and matching groups can help control for contaminating variables. The trade-off between internal and external validity is addressed, as well as types of experimental designs, simulation as an alternative, and ethical issues.
Scales are tools used to measure how individuals differ on variables of interest. There are four main types of scales: nominal scales assign subjects to categories, ordinal scales denote differences and rank categories, interval scales allow arithmetic operations on data, and ratio scales measure magnitude and proportions of differences. Examples provided include using Likert scales to rate agreement, ranking apps, and comparing boys and girls in a ratio. Various other scale types were also outlined such as dichotomous, category, semantic differential, numerical, Stapel, graphic rating, and forced choice scales. The presentation concluded with describing measures of central tendency and dispersion that correspond to each scale type, along with some common tests of significance.
The document discusses the meaning, objectives, characteristics, types, and steps of research. It defines research as a systematic, directed search for knowledge. The main objectives of research are to gain new insights or accurately describe characteristics. Research is characterized by careful investigation and testing of conclusions. The main types discussed are descriptive, analytical, applied, fundamental, quantitative, and qualitative research. Key steps include formulating the problem, reviewing literature, developing hypotheses, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting findings. Research design involves determining what, why, where, when of a study. It is important for testing hypotheses and controlling for extraneous variables.
This document provides information about purchasing a Charles 97-001995-A Wall/H-Frame Kit from Launch 3 Telecom. It lists contact information for purchasing the product, describes Launch 3 Telecom's payment and shipping policies, and outlines the warranty and additional services offered.
Fito es un ratoncito que aprendió a leer visitando una escuela primaria. Después de viajar por el mundo leyendo, llegó a vivir en la biblioteca de una escuela donde se hizo amigo de los niños. Ahora Fito vive feliz en la biblioteca, rodeado de libros y enseñando a los niños las maravillas de la lectura.
Rossett el cuidado del medio ambiente y su preservaciónDiana Reyes
El documento describe cómo fomentar la conciencia ecológica y el cuidado del medio ambiente a través de actividades como realizar un recorrido comunitario para observar el entorno, reconocer cómo el hombre ha transformado los ecosistemas, y elaborar un periódico mural presentando problemas ambientales y posibles soluciones.
Mr. Parinya Srisanga is a Thai male seeking a production planning position. He has 9 years of experience as a Production Planning Manager at LG Electronics in Rayong, Thailand. His responsibilities included production scheduling, materials planning, inventory management, and team leadership. He holds a Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering and certifications in Six Sigma and Jeong-Do management. He is proficient in both Thai and English.
La canción habla sobre la necesidad de mejorar las ciudades mediante el cuidado comunitario y cambios en las actitudes y comportamientos de las personas. Propone aumentar los parques, centros culturales y deportivos, y promover saludos más amables, respeto hacia los demás y ser buenos vecinos. El mensaje central es que, trabajando juntos, la ciudad puede mejorarse.
Kenya is undoubtedly a gem of the African lot. It is famous for the Maasai Mara, the land known for the big five. You can help the Maasai to get good education by volunteering and touring Kenya. Visit habarivolunteersandtours.com for details.
Subway comenzó en 1965 cuando Fred DeLuca, un estudiante de 17 años, abrió un local de sándwiches en Bridgeport, Connecticut, con la ayuda de un amigo de la familia. Tras el éxito inicial, comenzaron a expandirse a través de franquicias en 1974 y actualmente es la cadena de sándwiches más grande del mundo con más de 44.000 locales en 110 países. Su misión es ofrecer opciones de comida rápida frescas, saludables y ricas donde los clientes puedan personalizar sus sándwiches.
Facial expression identification by using features of salient facial landmarkseSAT Journals
Abstract
Facial expression recognition/identification (FER) systems plays vital role in the field of biometrics. Localizing the facial components accurately is a challenging task in image analysis and computer vision. Accurate detection of face and facial components gives effective performance with classification of expressions. This paper proposes feature based facial recognition system using JAFFE and CK databases. 18 facial landmarks were located using Haar cascade classifier. The distances between 12 points were extracted as features. These features were classified using SVM and K-NN classifier and comparison based on accuracy and execution time is done. The proposed algorithm gives better performance.
This manual provides instructions for using the LG G4 mobile phone. It is available in 17 different languages and can be accessed online at http://guideusermanual.com/product-name-lg-g4-manual&po=325291&lang=English. The manual covers the LG G4 model made by LG.
Sergio Guidi is a senior front end developer currently working at Tilt+Co on projects for clients such as Diabetes Australia and Crown Resort Permits and Reports. He has over 10 years of experience in IT across insurance and wealth management, including roles in development, architecture, and technical leadership. Key skills include JavaScript, Angular, and experience across the full stack from front end to integration technologies.
PMC501-PLG501 Single Subject Experimental Study.pdfPingHoong1
Single-subject research designs focus on intensively studying individual participants. They involve establishing a baseline measurement of a participant's behavior, implementing an intervention, and measuring the impact on the behavior. Common single-subject designs include A-B, which measures behavior during a baseline and intervention phase, and A-B-A-B, which measures behavior across multiple baseline and intervention phases. These designs allow researchers to determine causal relationships between interventions and behavior changes. Replication of studies' results is important to validate the effectiveness of interventions.
Experimental design involves purposefully introducing changes or treatments to observe their effects. The document discusses key aspects of experimental design, including:
1. Selecting subjects and assigning them to treatment or control groups to measure the effect of changes.
2. Considering factors like the type and amount of information desired, questions the design will and won't answer, and costs when selecting a design.
3. Key terminology like treatment, control, variables, randomness, and validity that are important to experimental design.
The document outlines different elements of research design including the approach, population and sampling, data collection methods, and data analysis. It discusses various types of research designs such as quantitative experimental designs like true experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental designs. It also discusses qualitative research designs and provides examples of different research methods.
This document provides an overview of quantitative research designs that are frequently used in educational research, including experimental, correlational, and survey designs. It defines experimental design and describes different types of experimental designs such as true experiments, quasi-experiments, and factorial designs. It also discusses correlational research design, survey research design, and provides the objectives, characteristics, and steps for each design. Finally, it discusses some common ethical issues for each research design.
The document describes the key aspects of experimental research methodology. It discusses the meaning of experimental research as making observations in a controlled situation to discover relationships between variables. It defines the different types of variables - independent, dependent, control, moderator, and intervening. It then outlines the main steps in conducting experimental research, including selecting the research area and problem, formulating hypotheses, identifying variables, developing a research tool, selecting a research design and sample, planning and implementing the experiment, collecting and analyzing data, replicating the experiment, deriving findings, and writing the research report.
This document discusses research methodology and design. It covers topics such as research design, research locale, sampling, data collection, validity, reliability, and threats to validity. For sampling, it describes probability sampling methods like simple random sampling, stratified random sampling, and cluster sampling. It also describes non-probability sampling methods like convenience sampling and snowball sampling. Experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental research designs are explained as well as threats to internal and external validity.
The document discusses various experimental research designs including completely randomized design, randomized block design, Latin square design, and other designs. It provides definitions and explanations of key concepts in experimental research such as experimental versus control groups, independent and dependent variables, randomization, and threats to internal and external validity. Examples of different types of experimental designs are given, including pre-experimental, quasi-experimental, and true experimental designs. Characteristics and advantages and disadvantages of each design type are also summarized.
This document discusses different types of experimental designs and their analysis techniques. It describes true experiments as having random assignment to experimental and control groups, a treatment for the experimental group, and post-testing of both groups. Quasi-experiments similarly compare groups but do not use random assignment. Pre-experimental designs like one-group pre-test post-test are used initially before true experiments. Ex post facto designs compare naturally occurring groups on variables of interest.
Understanding the Experimental Research Design(Part II)DrShalooSaini
This Power Point Presentation has been made while referring to the research books written by eminent, renowned and expert authors as mentioned in the references section. The purpose of this Presentation is to help the research students in developing an insight about the Experimental Research Design(Part- II).
Experimental Research Design - Meaning, Characteristics and ClassificationSundar B N
I) Experimental research designs aim to establish causal relationships by manipulating an independent variable and observing its effect on a dependent variable. They allow for a high level of control over extraneous variables.
II) The key components of an experiment are the independent variable, which is manipulated, and the dependent variable, which is measured. Control and random assignment help ensure the equivalence of groups.
III) True experiments use random assignment to groups, while quasi-experiments lack randomization. More rigorous designs like pre-test post-test control group allow for stronger conclusions about causality.
This document discusses research design and experimental research design. It defines key terms like independent variable, dependent variable, and extraneous variables. It explains the purpose of research design is to accurately assess relationships between variables. The three main characteristics of experimental research design are randomization, manipulation of the independent variable, and use of a control group. The document also categorizes and describes different types of true experimental research designs including post-test only, pretest-posttest, Solomon four-group, factorial, randomized block, and crossover designs.
The document discusses the experimental research process. It explains that research starts with an observation or question that leads to the development of a theory and hypothesis. The hypothesis is then tested through an experiment that manipulates an independent variable to measure its effect on a dependent variable, while controlling for other extraneous variables. Different types of experiments and their strengths and weaknesses are described. The key elements of an experimental design, including hypotheses, operationalization of variables, and controlling for confounding variables are also outlined.
Research Design for health care studentsCharu Parthe
This document discusses research design and methodology. It begins by defining research and outlining the key components of research design, including defining the problem, developing hypotheses, collecting and analyzing data, and formulating conclusions. It then describes different types of research designs, including experimental, non-experimental, analytical, and descriptive studies. Specific methodologies like randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies are explained in detail. Key aspects of research methodology like biases, confounding variables, and validity and reliability are also covered.
This document discusses different types of variables and quantitative research methods. It defines variables as concepts that can take on different values and be measured. Variables are classified as numeric, categorical, experimental, or based on their number. Numeric variables describe quantities while categorical variables describe qualities. Experimental variables involve manipulation in research studies. Quantitative research methods are categorized as experimental or non-experimental. Experimental research allows control and tests causation while non-experimental research observes phenomena. Several experimental and non-experimental research designs are described.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
· Describe single-case experimental designs and discuss reasons to use this design.
· Describe the one-group posttest-only design.
· Describe the one-group pretest-posttest design and the associated threats to internal validity that may occur: history, maturation, testing, instrument decay, and regression toward the mean.
· Describe the nonequivalent control group design and nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design, and discuss the advantages of having a control group.
· Distinguish between the interrupted time series design and control series design.
· Describe cross-sectional, longitudinal, and sequential research designs, including the advantages and disadvantages of each design.
· Define cohort effect.
Page 221
IN THE CLASSIC EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN DESCRIBED IN CHAPTER 8, PARTICIPANTS ARE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO THE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE CONDITIONS, AND A DEPENDENT VARIABLE IS MEASURED. The responses on the dependent measure are then compared to determine whether the independent variable had an effect. Because all other variables are held constant, differences on the dependent variable must be due to the effect of the independent variable. This design has high internal validity—we are very confident that the independent variable caused the observed responses on the dependent variable. You will frequently encounter this experimental design when you explore research in the behavioral sciences. However, other research designs have been devised to address special research problems.
This chapter focuses on three types of special research situations. The first is the instance in which the effect of an independent variable must be inferred from an experiment with only one participant—single-case experimental designs. Second, we will describe pre-experimental and quasi-experimental designs that may be considered if it is not possible to use one of the true experimental designs described in Chapter 8. Third, we consider research designs for studying changes that occur with age.
SINGLE-CASE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS
Single-case experimental designs have traditionally been called single-subject designs; an equivalent term you may see is small N designs. Much of the early interest in single-case designs in psychology came from research on operant conditioning pioneered by B. F. Skinner (e.g., Skinner, 1953). Today, research using single-case designs is often seen in applied behavior analysis in which operant conditioning techniques are used in clinical, counseling, educational, medical, and other applied settings (Kazdin, 2011, 2013).
Single-case experiments were developed from a need to determine whether an experimental manipulation had an effect on a single research participant. In a single-case design, the subject's behavior is measured over time during a baseline control period. The manipulation is then introduced during a treatment period, and the subject's behavior continues to be observed. A change in the subject's behavior ...
The document describes different types of quantitative research designs, including experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental designs. Experimental designs allow researchers to control variables and identify cause-and-effect relationships. Quasi-experimental designs are similar but do not use random assignment. Non-experimental designs observe phenomena as they naturally occur without manipulation of variables. Specific non-experimental designs discussed include surveys, correlational studies, ex-post facto research, comparative studies, and evaluative research.
The document provides an overview of research design, defining it as a plan for how a research study will be completed. It discusses the purpose of research design, which is to help researchers make valid, objective, and economical decisions about how to complete the entire research process. The document then covers various classifications of research designs, including those based on the number of contacts with the study population, the reference period of the study, and the nature of the investigation in terms of whether variables are controlled or not. Both quantitative and qualitative research designs are discussed.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
1. N 1 RESEARCH
Dr. G. K. SELLA KUMAR, Ph. D.,
Professor & Director
AsiaN Institute of Psycho-Diagnostics and Behaviour
Research, Coimbatore – 641044
2. Single - Subject Experimental
Research
In the present type of experimental design in which
single subject (N=1) participate.
It is also referred as Single Case or N 1 (one) research
Usually one subject will participate and the effect of
interventions is vigorously studied over the same one
Individual over times.
Most of these studies includes more than one subject
–referred as Small N research.
To test a particular treatment will tend to have
an effect on one or more behaviors
3. Significance
Highly useful in clinical researches – especially
in behavior modification and drug evaluation
In fact it can be applied to variety of research
topics.
It is similar to three Quasi Experimental Design
1] Time –Series Design, 2] Equivalent Sample
Design and 3] Equivalent Pretest – Post Test
Design.
The only difference is that Quasi – Experimental
design group of subject used while Single –subject
design concerned with individual
4. Origin….
Origin of single –subject design
developed from case study design
According to Kazdin (1982) the
development of Single –subject research
design –I being currently practiced.
Largely an out growth of work of B. F.
Skinner- operant conditioning.
Popularly called – experimental analysis
of behavior contains many features and
characteristics single- subject design
Many of the animal Lab researches
included one or few subjects upon
where repeated measures and
observations were taken
5. General Procedures of Single –Subject
Experimental Design
Repeated Measurements
Baseline or operant level
Manipulating Variable
Length of phases
6. Repeated measurement
Important aspects of N 1 research is the repeated
measurement or observation of the same individual
over times
Purpose is to determine the effect of intervention
introduced in the experimental condition
More careful and systematic repeated observation
– the more valid and reliable data can be gathered.
To assure reliable and valid data, the measures to
be used must be clearly defined.
Researcher must be careful in selecting the
behavior to be observed and behavior should be
measured
Continued.
. .
7. Measurable behavior must be observed without any
hesitation, be ready to exhibit it with reasonable
degree of frequency.
Measurement procedure must include, tests, survey,
questionnaires, Opinionaire, attitude scales., etc.
Researcher must select such instrument that can be
used repeatedly without any contamination or test –
interaction effect
For enhancing the reliability and validity of S-S
research, the measurement must also be done under
completely standardized condition
Under standardized conditions- measurements are
to be repeated, maintain uniformity in the time of
day, circumstances, general surroundings such as
location, presence of others etc.
Same measurement procedure for each replication
of measurement
8. Baselines
– The baseline also called operant level.
– one of the important aspect of general procedure.
– Baseline is used to determine the status of the
subject’s behavior prior to the intervention by the
researcher.
– Baseline data are gathered by observing the aspects of
individuals behavior.
– It is to be studied several times prior to the
intervention by the researchers.
– It should be long enough in determining the trend of
data.
– Generally three types of trends are revealed by
baseline.
1 A stable rate.
2 An increasing rate
3 A decreasing rate.
For better evaluation of the effectiveness of the
intervention the baseline must demonstrate a stable
rate.
9. Baselines
Problem occur in the evaluation of effectiveness
of the intervention because the baseline, even
prior to intervention is showing trend.
A good baseline is formed only after minimum of
three separate observation.
However, 5 to 8 or even more observation will be
better.
10. Manipulating Variables
Single subject Research also requires manipulation
of variables .
Ideal condition is that in which one variable should
be manipulated at any given time.
If two variables manipulated at a same time – effect
of each can’t be separated – effect became un-
interpretable.
In such –variable can be manipulated one by not at
a same time.
For Ex:- Systematic desensitization and medication
on aggressive child.
B1- T1-B2, B2-T2-B3.
11. Length of phases
Sometimes first intervention has to be larger than the
initial baseline in order to demonstrate a obvious change in
behavior.
*Baseline- Intervention – Baseline.
What should be the length of the each of these phases?
Ordinarily there are three phases .
Relative length of the each of different phases should be
equal.
If it happens, subsequent, second baseline and second
intervention should be of the same length.
However, there is a potential danger in having larger
intervention phases – i. e Carry – Over = Effect
Short intervention periods tends to prevent carry over
effect (Bijou, et al 1969).
12. Basic Designs of S-S research
Three types of Basic designs are
commonly used
1. Withdrawal Designs
2. Reversal Designs
3. Multiple Baseline Research
13. Withdrawal Design
In which intervention or Experimental treatment
introduced following the baseline period is
withdrawn
There are three basic withdrawal designs
A-B-A Design
A-B-A-B design and
Alternating treatment design
Before the discussion of these three – it will
be proper to start with A-B design – simplest
research strategy
14. A-B Design
Simplest Design for N = 1 Research
A Baseline (A) for a behavior is established and
subsequently predicted the behavior would continue to
exist if no treatment is administered.
If the following interaction (B) the behavior would
depart from the prediction
The researcher may attribute such change has
occurred due to the effect of treatment.
Continued. .
.
15. The researcher concludes that his intervention is effective in
producing a change – but it is weak because of the following
reason.
The researcher does not know what the
response rate might have been have no
treatment been administered
Researcher does not know certainly whether
any response change was produced because of
the specific intervention.
It might have changed just because the
researcher did something different.
This is called placebo effect – one of the
limitation of this design.
16. A-B-A Design
A-B-A Design important and popular design used in S-S research.
This design has baseline (A) – intervention (B) and baseline (A)
sequence.
The design has three phases, each of which represents a series of
measurement.
Behavior is studied to examine whether it changes from (A)
baseline or control condition to (B) the treatment condition, which
or not it comes back to to baseline (A) if the treatment or
intervention is withdrawn
The behavior actually increases during treatment
Decreased following withdrawal of intervention and then comes to
the level of the Baseline (A).
A sufficient reason is established - for the response changes is a
function of manipulation of independent variable or intervention
period.
A-B-A design is more powerful and convincing
yields more reliable and valid data.
Intervention withdrawal produce a return of response measure to
baseline- is confirmed
17. A-B-A-B design
Intervention is reintroduced after withdrawal
phase- this results A-B-A-B design
Operant level or baseline (A) And intervention (B)
each is repeated twice.
According to this design the behavior may change
from
1) (A) to (B) i.e Baseline to intervention
(Increases)
2) (B) to (A) i.e withdrawal of (B) to (A)
( Decreases)
3) (A) to (B) i.e behavior may increase with the
introduction of intervention (B) and the
behavior measure is strengthened
A-B-A-B design provides a better opportunity for
careful examination of intervention effect than the
simple A-B-A design
18. Alternating Treatment design
Sub class of A-B-A-B design
A and B are the two different treatments
Treatments A is withdrawn and replaced not by
baseline but by another treatment B
Purpose is to evaluate the relative effectiveness of
two or more than two treatments
Researches may come to the conclusion that
method A is better than method B or vice –versa.
The advantage is the treatment is used without
withdrawal and return to baseline.
19. 2 Reversal Design
In this design usually two alternative incompatible
behavior on chosen and researcher establishes the
baseline for each behavior
one behavior is subjected to one type of
experimental treatment and the other alternative
and incompatible behavior is subjected to another
type of experimental treatment
Baseline for both the behavior would be established
separately.
20. Multiple Baseline Design
I ) Multiple baseline design across behavior
II ) Multiple baseline design across subject
III ) Multiple baseline design across conditions or
environment.
21. Multiple Baseline Design Across
Behavior
The effect of independent variable s across several
different behaviors emitted by the same subject is
evaluated
He establishes baseline for each behavior
Subsequently a treatment is introduced for one target
behavior
If behavior changes – due to treatment abd other
behavior ( control) remains stable at the baseline –
concludes that the treatment is effective
After sometimes the treatment is applied to the second
target behavior and so on.
22. II ) Multiple baseline design across subject
A behavior is applied in sequence to the same class
of behavior in different participants in the same
environment
Another application is the same treatment is a
applied in different behavior emitted by a single
treatment
When treatment is applied to the same behavior of
different persons in the same in environment
sometimes – gap is followed
One participant after one Hr of establishing baseline
to a second after two Hrs of establishing baseline –
time lagged control design
23. III ) Multiple Baseline Design Across
Conditions or Environment.
Treatment is applied to the same behavior when
participants are in different environmental conditions
Researcher may have four different patients in 4
different rooms
Different baseline periods may be established each of
these four patients.
If there is response increment in all patients following
the interventions ,the treatment is likely to be effective
Contrasts to the withdrawal design – no need to
withdrawal the treatment once it has been applied
24. Data collection strategies
Two types of behaviors are commonly studied
1) Overt Behavior
2) Covert Behavior
Major data collection procedure is the observation of
an Overt behavior. In S-S research a number of ways
to measure Overt behavior. They are..
1) Frequency
2) Duration
3) Method of interval recording
4) Real Time observation method
Continued….
25. If the behaviors are not Overt the above measures are
not employed. In such situation other method of data
Collection are used .They are ..
1) Psycho-Physiological measures
2) Self- report measures
3) Response-Specific measures
26. Evaluating Data
Commonly Evaluated through visual inspection
Statistical Analysis is rarely used to analysis the effect
of intervention
Changes in the magnitude and rate of behavior being
studied
Average rate of performance and the level at the
change point should be examined – No of occurrence/
No of session
Change in the level - Shift in performance-fo end of
one phase to start of next phase
Show systematic changes –i.e +ve or –ve over time.
Tendency of change –How quickly change in response
occurs after beginning the treatment or withdrawal of
treatment – ensures the effectiveness of treatment.
27. Strength and Weakness
Carry out a scientific
investigation with only
one subject
Saves time in dealing
with many subject
Able to have full
concentration on only
one subject
Experimental situation
effectively through out
the research
Advantage for those who
dislike statistical
computations
Inappropriateness-
survey and Ex-post
facto
Practical limitation
– Time consuming
– Carry out only one
session
– Ss must be willing to
participate
– Cooperation by
giving sufficient time
– Difficult to measure
repeatedly
Order of effect -
results in
confounding and
limiting the quality
of generalization
28. Strength and Weakness
Irreversible effects
Descriptive and
Evaluative research
can be easily carried
out
Eliminate and hold
Constant extraneous
variable
Intra- subject
comparison is better
than inter subject
comparison - in
control of extraneous
variable
Irreversible effects
Lack of
effectiveness of
treatment
Researcher’s bias
Dependent
behaviors
Lack of external
validity
Magnitude of
effects
29. S-S Research and Large N Research
Control techniques
Manipulating the dependent variable
Monitoring the experimental data
Data analysis
External Validity of the results
Thus, S-S research differs considerably from large N
research in various important aspects such as employing
control techniques ,data analysis , generality of data etc.,
30. References
Singh, A. K. (1997). Tests, Measurements and
Research methods in behavioral sciences 2nd
Editon Bharathi Bhawan P.P 335-345.
Broota, K. D. (1985). Experimental Research in
Behavioral Research. Wishley Publishing
Company. New Delhi.p.9