POL 252-01
Spring 2016
INSTRUCTIONS
You have been appointed by President Obama to be on the
2016 Commission to Redraft the United States Constitution.
Write a detailed outline discussing the
general layout of this new document.
What would the new document look like?
What provisions would be added and what would be taken out? Why?
 What are constitutions?
 Charters and laws of states
 Codified Constitution
 Written document
 Specific sections or articles
 Uncodified Constitution
 Collection of laws, customs,
norms, traditions
 Informal nature
 #1: Absolutist Constitution
 Centralized power to produce, change legal docs
 No popular participation in govt.
 Examples: Communist countries, Post-Coup
 #2: Legislative Supremacy Constitution
 Provides (1) institutions and (2) elections
 Three main characteristics:
▪ (1) Majority vote, (2) No authority, (3) No Bill of Rights
 #3: Higher Law Constitution
 Presence of State institutions
 Govt. power / authority given to people
 Scope of legislative authority
 Gives (1) rights and (2) amendment process
 #1: Definite
 Clearly define what it contains; easily understood and carefully worded
 #2: Comprehensive
 Cover whole of government; information on organization
 #3: Brief
 State necessary provisions; detail leads to disputes
 #4: Durable and Elastic
 Not rigid; flexibility and stability
 #5: Fundamental Rights
 #6: Suitable
 Suit social, political, and economic conditions of citizenry
 Changes had to be
unanimous
 National government
left with no real power
 Draft Soldiers
 Regulate Commerce
 Have Monetary System
MADISON’SVIRGINIA PLAN PATERSON’S NEW JERSEY PLAN
Power given
to smaller states
Representation by
equality
Power given to
bigger states
Representation by
population
 Bicameral legislature
 Lower chamber
(House) based on
population
 Upper chamber
(Senate) based on
equality
Roger Sherman
Congress:
Legislate
President:
Execute
Judiciary:
Interpret
 Decentralized Constitutional Review
 Concrete Review
 Centralized Constitutional Review
 Abstract Review
The French
Constitutional Council
ENTRENCHED
CONSTITUTION
 Support of legislative
majority
 Majority ofVoters AND
Majority of States in
Referendum
UNENTRENCHED
CONSTITUTION
 No amendment process
 No specific legal status
higher than laws
Austria Switzerland
 Protects AgainstTyranny
 Dispersion and Diffusion of Power
 Increases Participation
 Officeholders and Citizens
 Improves Efficiency
 Ensures Policy Responsiveness / Innovation
 Reduces Conflict
 Creates Complexity and Confusion;
Reduces Accountability
 Increases Conflict
 “NIMBY” – Not in My BackYard
 Creates Inequality
 Economic Inequality, Racial Discrimination
 Law enforcement and justice are uneven
 Expertise and money
 Power rests with national government
 National government delegates authority to
subnational (state / local) governments
 Case Examples:
 Subnational governments hold power
 State/local governments delegate authority
to central government
Nigeria and India are two cases
that illustrate the positive and
negative aspects of federalism.
NIGERIA
 Positive aspect of federalism
 Solve ongoing differences
by creating more states
 Why would simply adding
more states matter for
stability?
 New states favored by people
for two reasons:
 (1) Avoid domination by largest
ethnic groups and (2) Share in
country resources
INDIA
 Negative aspect of federalism
 Some Indian states have
witnessed high performance
 Example: State of Kerala
(Southern India)
 Example: State of Mumbai
(Western India)
 Other states have lagged
behind considerably
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional Design

Constitutions and Constitutional Design

  • 1.
  • 5.
    INSTRUCTIONS You have beenappointed by President Obama to be on the 2016 Commission to Redraft the United States Constitution. Write a detailed outline discussing the general layout of this new document. What would the new document look like? What provisions would be added and what would be taken out? Why?
  • 7.
     What areconstitutions?  Charters and laws of states  Codified Constitution  Written document  Specific sections or articles  Uncodified Constitution  Collection of laws, customs, norms, traditions  Informal nature
  • 8.
     #1: AbsolutistConstitution  Centralized power to produce, change legal docs  No popular participation in govt.  Examples: Communist countries, Post-Coup  #2: Legislative Supremacy Constitution  Provides (1) institutions and (2) elections  Three main characteristics: ▪ (1) Majority vote, (2) No authority, (3) No Bill of Rights
  • 9.
     #3: HigherLaw Constitution  Presence of State institutions  Govt. power / authority given to people  Scope of legislative authority  Gives (1) rights and (2) amendment process
  • 11.
     #1: Definite Clearly define what it contains; easily understood and carefully worded  #2: Comprehensive  Cover whole of government; information on organization  #3: Brief  State necessary provisions; detail leads to disputes  #4: Durable and Elastic  Not rigid; flexibility and stability  #5: Fundamental Rights  #6: Suitable  Suit social, political, and economic conditions of citizenry
  • 14.
     Changes hadto be unanimous  National government left with no real power  Draft Soldiers  Regulate Commerce  Have Monetary System
  • 18.
    MADISON’SVIRGINIA PLAN PATERSON’SNEW JERSEY PLAN Power given to smaller states Representation by equality Power given to bigger states Representation by population
  • 19.
     Bicameral legislature Lower chamber (House) based on population  Upper chamber (Senate) based on equality Roger Sherman
  • 21.
  • 22.
     Decentralized ConstitutionalReview  Concrete Review
  • 23.
     Centralized ConstitutionalReview  Abstract Review The French Constitutional Council
  • 27.
    ENTRENCHED CONSTITUTION  Support oflegislative majority  Majority ofVoters AND Majority of States in Referendum UNENTRENCHED CONSTITUTION  No amendment process  No specific legal status higher than laws Austria Switzerland
  • 32.
     Protects AgainstTyranny Dispersion and Diffusion of Power  Increases Participation  Officeholders and Citizens  Improves Efficiency  Ensures Policy Responsiveness / Innovation  Reduces Conflict
  • 33.
     Creates Complexityand Confusion; Reduces Accountability  Increases Conflict  “NIMBY” – Not in My BackYard  Creates Inequality  Economic Inequality, Racial Discrimination  Law enforcement and justice are uneven  Expertise and money
  • 35.
     Power restswith national government  National government delegates authority to subnational (state / local) governments  Case Examples:
  • 37.
     Subnational governmentshold power  State/local governments delegate authority to central government
  • 39.
    Nigeria and Indiaare two cases that illustrate the positive and negative aspects of federalism.
  • 40.
    NIGERIA  Positive aspectof federalism  Solve ongoing differences by creating more states  Why would simply adding more states matter for stability?  New states favored by people for two reasons:  (1) Avoid domination by largest ethnic groups and (2) Share in country resources INDIA  Negative aspect of federalism  Some Indian states have witnessed high performance  Example: State of Kerala (Southern India)  Example: State of Mumbai (Western India)  Other states have lagged behind considerably

Editor's Notes

  • #3 We will now be moving into discussing constitutions and constitutional design. These are both fundamental issues for establishing a working government. I have placed a link on Canvas to the Comparative Constitutions Project. On this site, you can compare two constitutions. I highly encourage you to look at this page and see the differences between different countries’ constitutional structures.
  • #8 Constitutions are charters and laws of modern states. The constitution of a given country may take different formats: A codified constitution is a written document with specific sections or articles detailing the different branches of government, etc. The United States is a classic example of this constitutional type. An uncodified constitution is a collection of laws, customs, norms, and traditions that are codified over time. Only a few countries, including the United Kingdom, still have uncodified constitutions
  • #9 #1: Absolutist Constitution The authority to produce and change legal documents, including constitutions, is centralized and absolute. These documents reject popular participation in government, separation of powers, etc. Examples: Communist Party countries (e.g. USSR) and those following military coups in Africa and South America. #2: Legislative Supremacy Constitution These constitutions provide for a set of governmental institutions (i.e. three branches of government), as well as legislative elections. Main Characteristics: Can be changed by majority vote of legislature No institution can review constitutional legitimacy of laws Example: U.S. Court System – Supreme Court is highest court in U.S., no court above them to take case if lose at federal level. 3) No Bill of Rights to constrain legislative authority
  • #10 #3: Higher Law Constitution State institutions (e.g. legislative, executive, judicial branches) come from a written constitution. Ultimate power given to people through elections / referendums . Legislative authority must be in line with constitutional law. Constitution provides for set of rights and justice to defend rights. Constitution provides specific amendment process
  • #11 Think about your answer to this question.
  • #12 There are six major characteristics of constitutions: #1: Definite - The constitution must clearly define what it contains. - Easily understood by people; carefully worded.   #2: Comprehensive - A good constitution should cover the whole field of government. - Include information on the general organization and powers of the various institutions or components of government.   #3: Brief  - Constitution should only state necessary provisions - If the constitution is too detailed, it may lead to disputes in political system   #4: Durable and Elastic - Constitution should not be so rigid to prevent change nor so flexible as to encourage tampering with basic principles - Flexibility and stability in a constitution should go together   #5: Fundamental Rights - Constitution should contain list of fundamental rights of citizens   #6: Suitable - Should suit the social, political, and economic conditions of its citizenry
  • #13 Our own country provides a good example of constitutional design.
  • #14 Our nation’s first constitution was the Articles of Confederation .