08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
Conservation farming in zambia draft paper
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. Box 1: What kind of CA are farmer practicing?
In reality, farmers do not adopt all the principles of
conservation agriculture for various reasons.
These include: limited access to inputs; labour
constraints; or insufficient resources to grow cash
crops. Therefore, what farmers practice may be
quite different from the ‘ideal’ conservation
agriculture.
Source: Giller et al. (2009).
13.
14.
15.
16. Component Positive aspects Constraints to full adoption Possible interventions
Herbicides Reduce manual weeding, Usually expensive More research on
hence save time Disastrous and ineffective if compatibility of herbicides
Ease labour bottlenecks not used correctly Obtain chemicals at
Very effective if used Concerns over harmful subsidized prices
carefully residual effects on Input loan schemes
subsequent crops Enhance information
dissemination
Training in the safe use of
herbicides
Ripper Utilizes less energy and Requires availability of
labour draught animals
Less strenuous, ideal for Doesn’t incorporate seed Participatory technology
use with early rains and fertilizer development
(animals still weak) Drags piles of residues,
Time saving hence early frequent stoppages to
planting possible remove residues Provide equipment for
renting by farmers
Jab planter Precision in seed and Difficult to use in wet clay
fertilizer placement soils
Not suitable for larger plot Provide facilities for local
holdings manufacture
Relatively expensive and not
readily available
Direct seeder Saves time and labour Careful calibration needed
Minimum soil disturbance Relatively expensive and not Private-sector involvement
Higher yields achievable readily available
Crop residues Protects soils from direct Also needed to feed Incorporate fodder or
sun and direct raindrop livestock agroforestry
impact Threats from uncontrolled Live fencing
Conserves moisture, fires Policy for restricting fires
microbial activity May harbour pests (white and livestock
grubs)
Disturb equipment operation,
frequent stoppages
Crop rotation Improves soil fertility Preference for staple food Development of legumes
Reduces costs of crops markets
production (use of Unavailability of alternative
inorganic fertilizers) crops seeds and other inputs
Difficulties in marketing other
crops
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31. Box 2: Faidherbia Albida tree leaves as source of
plant nutrients
Decades of research have shown that through leaf
and pod fall, nitrogen fixation and associations with
soil micro-organisms, fertility accumulation under
mature canopy per hectare is as follows:
75kg N; 27kg P205; 183kg Ca0; 29kg MgO; 19kg
K20 and 20kg S. This is equivalent to 300 kg of
complete fertilizer and 250 kg of lime. This is worth
US$163, and can sustain maize yields of 4 tons per
hectare, as compared to smallholder farmers’
average yield of less than 2 tons per hectare in good
seasons.
Box 3: CFU staff and CA
When asked, “Do you believe in this
technology?” a Senior Officer at the
conservation farming unit in Lusaka replied
“I practice it.” He went on to explain that it
is a prerequisite for all staff of the CFU to
own farms cultivated under CF to
demonstrate the technology to farmers
they train – the results are impressive.
32. Box 4: Transformation
Thirty-nine-year-old Request Mulwani is a farmer from Mukwela
in Kalomo District with a family of eight. With three spans of oxen
he was able to plough about 15 hectares of land, 10 hectares of
which were dedicated to maize and 5 hectares to soybeans. His
average yields from the plots were 3.5 tons per hectare and 0.8
tons per hectare of maize and soybean.
Request came into contact with conservation farming in 2008
through the CFU. With the technical knowledge acquired from
CFU trainings, Request was able to harvest about 7.5 tons per
hectare from 5 hectares of land managed under the CF
technology. The results have encouraged him to put more land
under CF cultivation for the coming years.
Request is currently a CFU Farmer Coordinator and has helped
to showcase the successes of the technology for other farmers
in the southern region.
Box 5: Conservation agriculture adoption: father and son
Jeremy Simoloka and his son, Stembridge are both farmers in
Choma. Jeremy owns about 88 hectares of land, and allocated
20 hectares to his son to engage in arable farming. When
Stembridge heard about CF, he sought information about
training opportunities and then underwent training with the
conservation farming unit. His father, on the other hand,
remains suspicious of the technology and will have nothing to
do with it.
Jeremy harvests, on average, about 70 bags of maize of 50
kilograms each from the 4 hectares he cultivates. Stembridge,
on the other hand, cultivates all 20 hectares. Prior to adoption
of the technology, his maize yield was between 250 to 300
bags (50 kilograms each). After incorporating CF technologies
into his farming practices, his yields have increased to more
than 450 bags for the same piece of land. Although he admires
his son’s success with the technology, Jeremy remains
skeptical about CF, as his own earlier attempts at it were
unsuccessful.
Stembridge praised the benefits of the technology, but raised
the issue of access to inputs – obtaining fertilizer, in particular,
is a major challenge for him. He also cited weed management
as another challenge.
33. Name of conservation Approximate
agriculture programme Implementing amount
or project Period Activities Financier agency (US$)
Reversing Food Research and
development CFU of Zambia 23.6 million
Insecurity and 2006-2011 Norway National Farmers
Environmental Extension and (NOK 146 million)
Union
Degradation training
Upscaling Conservation Extension and
Agriculture for Increased training 8.5 million
Productivity and 2008-2010 Norway FAO
Production among small- Technical (NOK 52 million)
scale farmers in Zambia aspects
Conservation Agriculture
Scaling Up for increased 2008-2010 Extension and Norway FAO 5.0 million
Productivity and training
Production (CASPP)
Alliance for
Commodity
Climate Change Technical Trade in Eastern
aspects Norway 50.0 million
Mitigation and and Southern
Adaptation Component 2010-2015 Extension and Africa (ACTESA)
of Global Climate training (COMESA)
Change Alliance Project Input support European ACTESA 5.2 million
Commission (COMESA) (EUR 4.0 million)
Technical
Conservation Agriculture 2009-2011 aspects European 9.8 Million
FAO
Programme Extension and Union (EUR 7.5 million)
training
35. Box 6: Average maize yields in selected countries and regions
(2009/2010)
Country/region tonnes/hectare
World 4.5
Africa 1.7
South Africa 2.9
Zambia 1.6
Malawi 1.4
Namibia 1.4
Mozambique 1.0
Zimbabwe 1.0
Angola 0.6
Botswana 0.2
Source: FAO (country cereal balance sheets)