Collage of Engineering
Civil Engineering Department
CLE614 Soil Dynamics
Title : Cone Penetration Test
Submitted to : Dr. Yeşim Gürtuğ
ID : 20153680By : Muftah Aljoat
ID : 20152843Adel Milad
May/2016
 History of CPT
 Introduction
 Information about CPT
 CPT device consists
 Usage of CPT
 Process of CPT
 Advantages & Disadvantages
 Conclusion
 First develop in 1930’s as mechanical cone.
 Electric cones develop in 1960’s.
 Primary device for offshore investigations since
1970’s .
 CPT in this time is the most used and accepted in-
situ test methods for soil investigation world wide.
 It is to determine the Geotechnical engineering
properties of soils.
 It was used in 1950s at the Dutch Lab for soil
Mechanics so that it has also been called the
( Dutch cone test ) .
 In (CPT), a cone on the end of a series of rods is pushed into the ground with
constant rate .
 continuous measurements are made of the resistance to penetration of the
cone and a surface sleeve.
( Fig 1)
video 1 CPT device consists
CPT are conducted to measure and evaluate
characteristics of specific soils (soft sensitive silt sand,
clay, and some coarse cohesion less soils) such as:
1. Soil type
2. Relative soil density and in-situ stress conditions
3. Shear strength parameters
 After analyzing the results obtained from the test, we can
determine the soil type and design of shallow foundations
through the estimation of stiffness and shear strength of
cohesive soils.
 The results from CPT may also be used, directly, for
design of piled foundations in sand and gravel.
 Indirectly, it can be used (shear strength) for piles in clay.
Fig 2 shows a range of cones from a mini cone at 2cm2 to a large cone of
40cm2 , The mini cones are used for shallow investigations, whereas
the large cones can be used in gravely soils.
( Fig 2) Types of cone
Engine Operated (200KN) Hand Operated (30KN)
( Fig 3)
( Fig 4)
Advantages
• Rapid test
• Economy
• identification of problem soils
• Detailed & precise data
• Real time measurement
Disadvantages
• Soil sample not obtained
• Depth limited
• Normally can’t push through
gravel
• Requires special equipment
and skilled operator
 Save money for the owner by more accurately identifying the geological
strata.
 Seismic evaluations can be done to satisfy the new building code
requirements by measuring the low strain for shear wave velocity.
 Can be used to predict vertical pile capacity.
 In normally consolidated or recently aged cohesion less soils, provides
good estimates of settlement for shallow foundations.
 Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice written by
Tom Lunne, John J.M. Powell, and Peter K. Robertson.
 Howstuffworks.com
 Southern Earth Sciences,.Inc
 subsurface exploration using the cone penetrometer test
(paper)
 Cone Penetrometer Test (paper)
14

Cone Penetration Test

  • 1.
    Collage of Engineering CivilEngineering Department CLE614 Soil Dynamics Title : Cone Penetration Test Submitted to : Dr. Yeşim Gürtuğ ID : 20153680By : Muftah Aljoat ID : 20152843Adel Milad May/2016
  • 2.
     History ofCPT  Introduction  Information about CPT  CPT device consists  Usage of CPT  Process of CPT  Advantages & Disadvantages  Conclusion
  • 3.
     First developin 1930’s as mechanical cone.  Electric cones develop in 1960’s.  Primary device for offshore investigations since 1970’s .
  • 4.
     CPT inthis time is the most used and accepted in- situ test methods for soil investigation world wide.  It is to determine the Geotechnical engineering properties of soils.  It was used in 1950s at the Dutch Lab for soil Mechanics so that it has also been called the ( Dutch cone test ) .
  • 5.
     In (CPT),a cone on the end of a series of rods is pushed into the ground with constant rate .  continuous measurements are made of the resistance to penetration of the cone and a surface sleeve. ( Fig 1)
  • 6.
    video 1 CPTdevice consists
  • 7.
    CPT are conductedto measure and evaluate characteristics of specific soils (soft sensitive silt sand, clay, and some coarse cohesion less soils) such as: 1. Soil type 2. Relative soil density and in-situ stress conditions 3. Shear strength parameters
  • 8.
     After analyzingthe results obtained from the test, we can determine the soil type and design of shallow foundations through the estimation of stiffness and shear strength of cohesive soils.  The results from CPT may also be used, directly, for design of piled foundations in sand and gravel.  Indirectly, it can be used (shear strength) for piles in clay.
  • 9.
    Fig 2 showsa range of cones from a mini cone at 2cm2 to a large cone of 40cm2 , The mini cones are used for shallow investigations, whereas the large cones can be used in gravely soils. ( Fig 2) Types of cone
  • 10.
    Engine Operated (200KN)Hand Operated (30KN) ( Fig 3)
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Advantages • Rapid test •Economy • identification of problem soils • Detailed & precise data • Real time measurement Disadvantages • Soil sample not obtained • Depth limited • Normally can’t push through gravel • Requires special equipment and skilled operator
  • 13.
     Save moneyfor the owner by more accurately identifying the geological strata.  Seismic evaluations can be done to satisfy the new building code requirements by measuring the low strain for shear wave velocity.  Can be used to predict vertical pile capacity.  In normally consolidated or recently aged cohesion less soils, provides good estimates of settlement for shallow foundations.
  • 14.
     Cone PenetrationTesting in Geotechnical Practice written by Tom Lunne, John J.M. Powell, and Peter K. Robertson.  Howstuffworks.com  Southern Earth Sciences,.Inc  subsurface exploration using the cone penetrometer test (paper)  Cone Penetrometer Test (paper) 14

Editor's Notes

  • #5 Role of CPT Estimate soil parameters Provide results for direct geotechnical design
  • #8 role of CPT Estimate soil parameters Provide results for direct geotechnical design