CONCRETE
OVERLAYS
A PROVEN RESURFACING STRATEGY
Gordon Smith, P.E.,
Associate Director
National CP Tech Center
40th
Annual Concrete Paving
Workshop
January 22, 2019
Lincoln, Nebraska
Highway agencies and industry are responding
with new ideas about building and modernizing
today’s pavement networks.
CHANGE IS ALL AROUND
US
NEW LIFE FOR AGING PAVEMENTS
Preservation Resurfacing Overlays Reconstruction
Preservation Mode!Preservation Mode!
$ $
SO, WHAT ARE WE DOING
ABOUT IT?
WE’RE WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP TO
DEVELOP STRATEGIES AND
GUIDELINES FOR PROJECT SPECIFIC,
COST EFFECTIVE CONCRETE
SOLUTIONS.
CONCRETE OVERLAYS FOR
EVERY NEED!
..
......
.. ......
.... ..
..
....
..
....
....
.... ..
..
..
......
..
..
WT BOL UBOL
Secondary 1177.6 88.4 490.5 1756.5
Primary 81.8 52.7 160.7 295.2
1259.4 141.1 651.2 2051.7
miles
Municipal 300,000 SY
(approximate)
Airport 739,840 SY
(24 Runways)
CONTENTS
1. Overview of Overlay
Families
2. Overlay Types and Uses
3. Evaluations & Selections
4. Six Overlay Summaries
(11”x17 “sheets)
5. Design Section
6. Miscellaneous Design
Details
7. Overlay Materials Section
8. Work Zones Under Traffic
9. Key Points for Overlay
Construction
10. Accelerated Construction
11. Specification Considerations
12. Repairs of Overlays
CONCRETE OVERLAYS
Bonded
Concrete
Overlay of
Concrete
Pavements
Bonded
Concrete
Overlay of
Asphalt
Pavements
Bonded
Concrete
Overlay of
Composite
Pavements
Bonded Overlay System
Unbonded
Concrete
Overlay of
Concrete
Pavements
Unbonded
Concrete
Overlay of
Asphalt
Pavements
Unbonded
Concrete
Overlay of
Composite
Pavements
Unbonded Overlay System
Thinner Thicker
BOND IS INTEGRAL TO DESIGN OLD PAVEMENT IS BASE
 Not a new design procedure!
 Background of recommended
overlay design techniques
 Detailed examples of how to
use the existing design
methodology
 Learn by example – then apply
for your situation!
 http://www.cptechcenter.org
Check Out
PavementDesigner
Pavement Design Simplified
for:• Streets and Roads
• JPCP
• RCC
• CRCP
• Overlays
• Parking Facilities
• Intermodal Yards
FREE Pavement
Design Program
NATIONWIDE CONCRETE
OVERLAYS GROWTH
As of: November 2017
CONCRETE OVERLAYS IN THE USA
 National perspective
 ACPA overlay project explorer:
IOWA’S HISTORY OF CONCRETE OVERLAY PERFORMANCE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 Full Report: Performance of Concrete Overlays in
Iowa
 Phase I of Iowa Highway Research Board TR-689
 Project Team:
 CP Tech Center: Jerod Gross, Dale Harrington, Dr.
Peter Taylor
 Iowa State University: Yu-An Chen, Dr. Halil
Ceylan, Inya Nnelanya, Dr. Omar Smadi
CONCRETE OVERLAYS IN IOWA
 Iowa: over 2,000 centerline miles of concrete
overlays have been constructed since the late ‘70s
 Over half constructed since 2005
 Mostly on county highway system
PROJECT BACKGROUND
 How well have Iowa’s overlays
performed? (How long do they last?)
 Approximately 470/506 overlay
projects are still in service today
 Includes 68/96 constructed before
1990
 Compare to older sources that
indicate expected service life for a
concrete overlay is only about 20
years Dallas County, IA, Constructed 1977
PROJECT BACKGROUND
 However, as of 2015, there had been no attempt to
characterize performance of overlays to determine
expected service life & what made projects successful
Dallas County, IA, Constructed 1992
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
 Define performance of Iowa’s concrete overlays
 Create performance curves
 Analyze specific design choices and characteristics and
link to performance
 Overlay type (thin bonded, unbonded)
 Thickness
 Joint spacing
 Traffic
 Incorporate lessons learned to improve overlay design and
performance
DATA COMPILATION & COLLECTION
 Automated pavement condition
data: Iowa Pavement Management
Program (IPMP)
 Opt-in program for local agencies
 Data collection began in early
2000s (opt-in)
 Since 2013, all streets & roads
are covered every other year
 This data then combined with
ICPA overlay project records to
produce the complete data set
OVERLAY TYPES
 Bonded Concrete Overlay of Concrete (BCOC)
 Bonded Concrete Overlay of Asphalt (BCOA)
 Defined as thickness ≤ 6 inches
 Unbonded Concrete Overlay of Concrete (UBCOC)
 Unbonded Concrete Overlay of Asphalt (UBCOA)
 Defined as thickness > 6 inches
DATA DISTRIBUTION
 Typical designs in Iowa
 Early on: 6 inches on asphalt
(“whitetopping”) or 6+ inches
unbonded on concrete
 Performance data for
projects up to 40 years old
Washington County, IA, Constructed 1977
DATA DISTRIBUTION
 Typical designs in Iowa
 ‘00s: more types of
projects, including
thinner overlays
 Advent of new design
procedures, shorter slabs,
fiber-reinforcement
 About 10 years worth of
data, with some
exceptions
Boone, IA, Constructed 2005
DATA DISTRIBUTION
 Full data set contains all overlay types/designs:
36
DATA DISTRIBUTION
 Distribution based on slab thickness:
38
39
PERFORMANCE METRICS
 Performance characterized by PCI (Pavement Condition Index) & IRI
 IPMP PCI equation incorporates:
 IRI (accounts for 40% of PCI)
 Transverse Cracking
 Joint Spalling
 D-cracking
(no faulting)
Le Mars, IA, Constructed 2010
PERFORMANCE METRICS
 Performance charts:
 PCI scale:
 Excellent: 81-100
 Good: 61-80
 Fair: 41-60
 Poor: 21-40
 Very Poor: 0-20
Image: Pavement Interactive
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
 PCI vs. Age (data set as a whole):
Figures: Chen and Ceylan
PCC OVERLAY PERFORMANCE
PCI (Ages 0-37 years)
PCI (Ages 21-30 years)
44
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
 PCI vs. Age - BCOA only (organized by thickness):
Figures: Chen and Ceylan
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
 PCI vs. Age - BCOA only (organized by joint spacing):
Figures: Chen and Ceylan
Short slab designs
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
 PCI vs. Age - UBCOA only (organized by thickness):
Figures: Chen and Ceylan
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
 PCI vs. Age - UBCOC only (organized by thickness):
Figures: Chen and Ceylan
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
 IRI vs. Age (data set as a whole):
Figures: Chen and Ceylan
~40 years to IRI = 170
50
PCC OVERLAY PERFORMANCE
IRI (Ages 0-37 years)
IRI (Ages > 30 years)
51
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
 Key findings and trends:
 Overall performance of Iowa’s concrete overlays has been
excellent
 As a whole: about 35 years to PCI = 60
 About 40 years to IRI = 170 in/mi
 Good performance from each of BCOA, UBCOA & UBCOC
 Overlays of asphalt slightly better than UBCOC
 BCOC less successful overall, but performed well in context of
design life expectations
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
 Key findings and trends:
 Thickness
 In general: thicker overlays have performed better for all overlay
types (e.g. for BCOA, 6” > 5” > 4”)
 Transverse joint spacing
 Good early performance from short slab designs (6”) on BCOA/thin
overlays
 Older designs with 15-20 foot slabs performed well long-term
 12 foot slabs—inconclusive
 Traffic—inconclusive
 Most of these projects are low-volume, <1,000 vpd
 Not enough truck traffic data available from local agencies
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
 12 foot transverse joint spacing
 Across multiple splits, apparent decline in performance of
overlays with 12 foot joint spacing (even compared to
longer spacings)
 UBCOA (organized by joint spacing):
Figures: Chen and Ceylan
FIELD REVIEWS
 Field reviews were performed to:
 supplement data analysis
 verify findings
 investigate trends, outliers
Pottawattamie County, IA, Constructed 1993
FIELD REVIEWS
 Observed distresses:
 Materials-related
Pottawattamie County, IA, Constructed 1999
FIELD REVIEWS
 Observed distresses:
 Rough ride—construction or curling/warping
 Occasional faulting
Buchanan County, IA, Constructed 1996
FIELD REVIEWS
 Observed distresses:
 Load-related, possibly mis-designed
or under-designed
Dallas County, IA, Constructed 2006
FIELD REVIEWS
 Key takeaways:
 Observed performance generally matches data
 Poor performing outliers & early failure causes:
 Materials-related
 Load-related/under-design
 Rough ride
 In short... mostly the same issues that we run into with
conventional PCC pavements
 Be aware of increased potential for curling/warping
 Beyond above explanations, no direct observations to indicate that
there’s a specific problem with 12 ft joint spacing design
CONCLUSIONS
 Overall performance of Iowa’s concrete overlays has
been excellent
 Upwards of 30-40+ year performance life
 Overlays are very well-suited to county highways
 Good success to date on interstate, state highways, and
city streets as well
NEXT STEPS
 Move from performance history → survivability, performance
models
 Continue compiling data, keeping the database updated
Le Mars, IA, Constructed 2017
CONCRETE OVERLAY ON AN ASPHALT
MUNICIPAL STREET IN LOMBARD, IL
(2003)
I-70 @ GRAND JUNCTION,
CO.
RURAL ROAD IN MITCHELL
COUNTY, IOWA
NORTHBOUND US 81 NEAR STRANG AND BELVEDERE, NE
8” UNBONDED PCC OVERLAY (1982 AND 1984)
65
US 30 BETWEEN LEXINGTON AND COZAD, NE
5” UNBONDED OVERLAY OVER ASPHALT OVER OLD
PCC (2015)
66
A 6-INCH UNBONDED OVERLAY OVER FULL-DEPTH HMA
PLACED IN 2010 IN PIERCE COUNTY ON 556TH
STREET
JUST NORTH OF NORFOLK, NEBRASKA
67
CELEBRATING 50 YEARS OF LEADERSHIP AND SERVICECELEBRATING 50 YEARS OF LEADERSHIP AND SERVICE
I-70I-70
Western KansasWestern Kansas
6x6x6 Concrete Overlay6x6x6 Concrete Overlay
THIS ISTHIS IS
RESURFACING!RESURFACING!
Grundy County, IA, Constructed 1978
www.cptechcenter.org

Concrete Overlays: A Proven Resurfacing Strategy

  • 1.
    CONCRETE OVERLAYS A PROVEN RESURFACINGSTRATEGY Gordon Smith, P.E., Associate Director National CP Tech Center
  • 2.
  • 6.
    Highway agencies andindustry are responding with new ideas about building and modernizing today’s pavement networks. CHANGE IS ALL AROUND US
  • 7.
    NEW LIFE FORAGING PAVEMENTS
  • 8.
    Preservation Resurfacing OverlaysReconstruction Preservation Mode!Preservation Mode! $ $
  • 9.
    SO, WHAT AREWE DOING ABOUT IT? WE’RE WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP TO DEVELOP STRATEGIES AND GUIDELINES FOR PROJECT SPECIFIC, COST EFFECTIVE CONCRETE SOLUTIONS.
  • 10.
    CONCRETE OVERLAYS FOR EVERYNEED! .. ...... .. ...... .... .. .. .... .. .... .... .... .. .. .. ...... .. ..
  • 15.
    WT BOL UBOL Secondary1177.6 88.4 490.5 1756.5 Primary 81.8 52.7 160.7 295.2 1259.4 141.1 651.2 2051.7 miles Municipal 300,000 SY (approximate) Airport 739,840 SY (24 Runways)
  • 17.
    CONTENTS 1. Overview ofOverlay Families 2. Overlay Types and Uses 3. Evaluations & Selections 4. Six Overlay Summaries (11”x17 “sheets) 5. Design Section 6. Miscellaneous Design Details 7. Overlay Materials Section 8. Work Zones Under Traffic 9. Key Points for Overlay Construction 10. Accelerated Construction 11. Specification Considerations 12. Repairs of Overlays
  • 18.
    CONCRETE OVERLAYS Bonded Concrete Overlay of Concrete Pavements Bonded Concrete Overlayof Asphalt Pavements Bonded Concrete Overlay of Composite Pavements Bonded Overlay System Unbonded Concrete Overlay of Concrete Pavements Unbonded Concrete Overlay of Asphalt Pavements Unbonded Concrete Overlay of Composite Pavements Unbonded Overlay System Thinner Thicker BOND IS INTEGRAL TO DESIGN OLD PAVEMENT IS BASE
  • 19.
     Not anew design procedure!  Background of recommended overlay design techniques  Detailed examples of how to use the existing design methodology  Learn by example – then apply for your situation!  http://www.cptechcenter.org
  • 21.
    Check Out PavementDesigner Pavement DesignSimplified for:• Streets and Roads • JPCP • RCC • CRCP • Overlays • Parking Facilities • Intermodal Yards FREE Pavement Design Program
  • 22.
  • 23.
    CONCRETE OVERLAYS INTHE USA  National perspective  ACPA overlay project explorer:
  • 25.
    IOWA’S HISTORY OFCONCRETE OVERLAY PERFORMANCE
  • 26.
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  Full Report:Performance of Concrete Overlays in Iowa  Phase I of Iowa Highway Research Board TR-689  Project Team:  CP Tech Center: Jerod Gross, Dale Harrington, Dr. Peter Taylor  Iowa State University: Yu-An Chen, Dr. Halil Ceylan, Inya Nnelanya, Dr. Omar Smadi
  • 27.
    CONCRETE OVERLAYS INIOWA  Iowa: over 2,000 centerline miles of concrete overlays have been constructed since the late ‘70s  Over half constructed since 2005  Mostly on county highway system
  • 28.
    PROJECT BACKGROUND  Howwell have Iowa’s overlays performed? (How long do they last?)  Approximately 470/506 overlay projects are still in service today  Includes 68/96 constructed before 1990  Compare to older sources that indicate expected service life for a concrete overlay is only about 20 years Dallas County, IA, Constructed 1977
  • 29.
    PROJECT BACKGROUND  However,as of 2015, there had been no attempt to characterize performance of overlays to determine expected service life & what made projects successful Dallas County, IA, Constructed 1992
  • 30.
    PROJECT OBJECTIVES  Defineperformance of Iowa’s concrete overlays  Create performance curves  Analyze specific design choices and characteristics and link to performance  Overlay type (thin bonded, unbonded)  Thickness  Joint spacing  Traffic  Incorporate lessons learned to improve overlay design and performance
  • 31.
    DATA COMPILATION &COLLECTION  Automated pavement condition data: Iowa Pavement Management Program (IPMP)  Opt-in program for local agencies  Data collection began in early 2000s (opt-in)  Since 2013, all streets & roads are covered every other year  This data then combined with ICPA overlay project records to produce the complete data set
  • 32.
    OVERLAY TYPES  BondedConcrete Overlay of Concrete (BCOC)  Bonded Concrete Overlay of Asphalt (BCOA)  Defined as thickness ≤ 6 inches  Unbonded Concrete Overlay of Concrete (UBCOC)  Unbonded Concrete Overlay of Asphalt (UBCOA)  Defined as thickness > 6 inches
  • 33.
    DATA DISTRIBUTION  Typicaldesigns in Iowa  Early on: 6 inches on asphalt (“whitetopping”) or 6+ inches unbonded on concrete  Performance data for projects up to 40 years old Washington County, IA, Constructed 1977
  • 34.
    DATA DISTRIBUTION  Typicaldesigns in Iowa  ‘00s: more types of projects, including thinner overlays  Advent of new design procedures, shorter slabs, fiber-reinforcement  About 10 years worth of data, with some exceptions Boone, IA, Constructed 2005
  • 35.
    DATA DISTRIBUTION  Fulldata set contains all overlay types/designs:
  • 36.
  • 37.
    DATA DISTRIBUTION  Distributionbased on slab thickness:
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
    PERFORMANCE METRICS  Performancecharacterized by PCI (Pavement Condition Index) & IRI  IPMP PCI equation incorporates:  IRI (accounts for 40% of PCI)  Transverse Cracking  Joint Spalling  D-cracking (no faulting) Le Mars, IA, Constructed 2010
  • 41.
    PERFORMANCE METRICS  Performancecharts:  PCI scale:  Excellent: 81-100  Good: 61-80  Fair: 41-60  Poor: 21-40  Very Poor: 0-20 Image: Pavement Interactive
  • 42.
    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS PCI vs. Age (data set as a whole): Figures: Chen and Ceylan
  • 43.
    PCC OVERLAY PERFORMANCE PCI(Ages 0-37 years)
  • 44.
    PCI (Ages 21-30years) 44
  • 45.
    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS PCI vs. Age - BCOA only (organized by thickness): Figures: Chen and Ceylan
  • 46.
    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS PCI vs. Age - BCOA only (organized by joint spacing): Figures: Chen and Ceylan Short slab designs
  • 47.
    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS PCI vs. Age - UBCOA only (organized by thickness): Figures: Chen and Ceylan
  • 48.
    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS PCI vs. Age - UBCOC only (organized by thickness): Figures: Chen and Ceylan
  • 49.
    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS IRI vs. Age (data set as a whole): Figures: Chen and Ceylan ~40 years to IRI = 170
  • 50.
  • 51.
    IRI (Ages >30 years) 51
  • 52.
    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Key findings and trends:  Overall performance of Iowa’s concrete overlays has been excellent  As a whole: about 35 years to PCI = 60  About 40 years to IRI = 170 in/mi  Good performance from each of BCOA, UBCOA & UBCOC  Overlays of asphalt slightly better than UBCOC  BCOC less successful overall, but performed well in context of design life expectations
  • 53.
    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Key findings and trends:  Thickness  In general: thicker overlays have performed better for all overlay types (e.g. for BCOA, 6” > 5” > 4”)  Transverse joint spacing  Good early performance from short slab designs (6”) on BCOA/thin overlays  Older designs with 15-20 foot slabs performed well long-term  12 foot slabs—inconclusive  Traffic—inconclusive  Most of these projects are low-volume, <1,000 vpd  Not enough truck traffic data available from local agencies
  • 54.
    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 12 foot transverse joint spacing  Across multiple splits, apparent decline in performance of overlays with 12 foot joint spacing (even compared to longer spacings)  UBCOA (organized by joint spacing): Figures: Chen and Ceylan
  • 55.
    FIELD REVIEWS  Fieldreviews were performed to:  supplement data analysis  verify findings  investigate trends, outliers Pottawattamie County, IA, Constructed 1993
  • 56.
    FIELD REVIEWS  Observeddistresses:  Materials-related Pottawattamie County, IA, Constructed 1999
  • 57.
    FIELD REVIEWS  Observeddistresses:  Rough ride—construction or curling/warping  Occasional faulting Buchanan County, IA, Constructed 1996
  • 58.
    FIELD REVIEWS  Observeddistresses:  Load-related, possibly mis-designed or under-designed Dallas County, IA, Constructed 2006
  • 59.
    FIELD REVIEWS  Keytakeaways:  Observed performance generally matches data  Poor performing outliers & early failure causes:  Materials-related  Load-related/under-design  Rough ride  In short... mostly the same issues that we run into with conventional PCC pavements  Be aware of increased potential for curling/warping  Beyond above explanations, no direct observations to indicate that there’s a specific problem with 12 ft joint spacing design
  • 60.
    CONCLUSIONS  Overall performanceof Iowa’s concrete overlays has been excellent  Upwards of 30-40+ year performance life  Overlays are very well-suited to county highways  Good success to date on interstate, state highways, and city streets as well
  • 61.
    NEXT STEPS  Movefrom performance history → survivability, performance models  Continue compiling data, keeping the database updated Le Mars, IA, Constructed 2017
  • 62.
    CONCRETE OVERLAY ONAN ASPHALT MUNICIPAL STREET IN LOMBARD, IL (2003)
  • 63.
    I-70 @ GRANDJUNCTION, CO.
  • 64.
    RURAL ROAD INMITCHELL COUNTY, IOWA
  • 65.
    NORTHBOUND US 81NEAR STRANG AND BELVEDERE, NE 8” UNBONDED PCC OVERLAY (1982 AND 1984) 65
  • 66.
    US 30 BETWEENLEXINGTON AND COZAD, NE 5” UNBONDED OVERLAY OVER ASPHALT OVER OLD PCC (2015) 66
  • 67.
    A 6-INCH UNBONDEDOVERLAY OVER FULL-DEPTH HMA PLACED IN 2010 IN PIERCE COUNTY ON 556TH STREET JUST NORTH OF NORFOLK, NEBRASKA 67
  • 68.
    CELEBRATING 50 YEARSOF LEADERSHIP AND SERVICECELEBRATING 50 YEARS OF LEADERSHIP AND SERVICE I-70I-70 Western KansasWestern Kansas 6x6x6 Concrete Overlay6x6x6 Concrete Overlay THIS ISTHIS IS RESURFACING!RESURFACING!
  • 70.
    Grundy County, IA,Constructed 1978 www.cptechcenter.org

Editor's Notes

  • #4 But it wasn’t always concrete – in the 20s – we had to “get out of the mud”!
  • #5 Our first concrete street was built in LeMars in 1904
  • #6 Allow me to offer some brief insight to Iowa’s paving market as we prepare to look at proven cost effective pavement resurfacing solutions.
  • #8 And our focus on what need’s to be done has changed, too. No longer building new roads, but taking care of what is out there.
  • #11 Overlays on concrete, on asphalt, on composites, designed as bonded or unbonded, we’ve proven that we can effectively address all of these needs
  • #16 The proof of the overlay success in Iowa.
  • #17 See how the overlay is becoming more important to our future?
  • #20 There is ongoing work to update and finish this document (explained later in this presentation), but it will be released early in 2012.
  • #24 From ACPA’s overlay explorer. IA = about 1/3 of all overlay projects nationwide
  • #30 Note two projects—same county, one failed in ~25 years, another going on 40 yrs old with no plan to replace
  • #33 Briefly cover different overlay types. Note difference in thickness and joint spacing between different overlay types.
  • #34 We have some older 3-5” PCC overlays, but newer short slab designs only really started appearing in ‘00s
  • #38 Almost half of all projects are 6” overlays; thinner (4-5”) now account for close to 1/3 of total overlay mileage
  • #41 Faulting is indirectly measured via IRI
  • #43 PCI = 60 is where condition changes from ‘good’ to ‘fair.’ ‘Poor’ condition doesn’t actually begin until PCI = 40Performance plot of PCI vs. age for all concrete overlays. (Includes all types of overlays, all thickness, joint spacing, etc.) Key point of emphasis here is that the majority of concrete overlays are on track to fulfill a very good long-term service life. The trendline reaches a PCI of 60 at 35 years. Variability in the data means that you can’t directly infer a 35 year performance life for all concrete overlays, but projects are clearly performing well—certainly the vast majority are lasting longer than 20 years. (May also note here that PCI = 60 is where condition changes from ‘good’ to ‘fair.’ ‘Poor’ condition doesn’t actually begin until PCI = 40.)
  • #46 PCI for BCOA projects only. This slide is here primarily to give a “sneak peek” at how many different plots/charts are available in the full report, breaking down the data into smaller groups and offering comparisons. One thing you can note here is that thicker BCOA projects (5-6 in.) have shown better long-term performance than thinner BCOA projects (4 in.). Although the more modern thin overlay designs only have data for about 10 years or so.
  • #47 This slide makes performance of newer, short slab designs more clear. Also you can see kind of an outlier with 12 ft joint spacing performance. Similar to prior slide, but now BCOA performance is sorted by joint spacing as opposed to thickness.
  • #48 Another sneak peek slide, this time for thick “unbonded” overlays of asphalt. Shows very good long term performance of 7 and 8 inch overlays.
  • #49 Somewhat worse observed performance than our bonded and unbonded overlays of asphalt—except for very thick design (interstate)
  • #50 Performance plot of IRI vs. age for all overlays. (Includes all types of overlays, all thickness, joint spacing, etc.) The reason a line is drawn at IRI = 170 in/mi is because that is FHWA’s standard for when ride quality becomes “not acceptable.” Like previous slide, data demonstrates great long-term performance of overlays in terms of ride quality. Trendline intersection appears to be at approx. 40 years, although same caveat applies.
  • #54 So among thin overlays, the relatively thicker ones have had the longest performance life
  • #58 Greater susceptibility for curling and warping on overlays—more surface area relative to volume of slab.
  • #59 Maybe not just under-designed but also poor choice of slab size. Smaller slabs would have mitigated stresses.