Download to read offline
More Related Content
Similar to Accelerated Delivery - NDOT Design-Build Project
Accelerated Delivery - NDOT Design-Build Project
- 1.
- 3.
- 4. Transportation Innovation Act ■ ApprovedApril 18, 2016 ■ Alternative Delivery Design-Build CMGC
- 5. Statutory Authority 39-2801 :39-2824 ■ Accelerated Delivery ■ Procurement Process ■ RFQ and RFP ■ Owner Representative ■ Stipend ■ BestValue Proposers ■ Guidelines https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes
- 6. Accelerated Delivery Guidelines https://dot.nebraska.gov/business-center/design-build/ ■General Policies ■ Provides the Framework ■ Risk Management ■ Flexible ■ Suited for Nebraska
- 7. Project Selection Matrix ■Objective ■ Complexity ■ Permitting Status ■ Public Interest ■ Funding ■ Size Project Characteristics Likely Candidate for Delivery as D/B/B CM/GC D/B Primary project delivery objective NDOR control of detailed design Completion schedule Cost Early cost and schedule certainty Reduced NDOR staff involvement Technical innovation Funding Programmed and funding committed Programmed but full funding not committed Not programmed Project size Greater than $50 million $10 million to $49 million Less than $10 million ITS projects Project complexity Numerous primary features (road, bridges, ITS) Closely interrelated features Constrained construction phasing Unique or unusual site conditions Specialized skills need for design or construction Emerging technology included Extensive temporary features required Delivery Method is Compatible with the Characteristic Delivery Method May Be Compatible with the Characteristic Delivery Method is Not Compatible with the Characteristic
- 8. NEWTOOL FOR DOINGBUSINESS….. CM/GC & DESIGN-BUILD
- 9. ■ Construction Manager/GeneralContractor ■ Construction Manager at-Risk (CMR) ■ Owner engages contractor during design ■ Provides constructability input ■ Contract “target price” at 60%-90% Design level Owner ContractorDesign Agree on Build Contract? YES NO CM/GC Construction Phase Same Contractor New Contractor Design Phase
- 10. Design-Build CONSTRUCTION FINAL : DESIGN PERMITTING ROW PRELIMINARY : DESIGN PERMITTING ROW BID CONCEPT: DESIGN PERMITTING ROW FINAL : DESIGN PERMITTING ROW Cost Established Possible Redesign Traditional Method Design-Build Method Time Saved Project Duration Design-Build Delivery Traditional Delivery Cost Established CONSTRUCTION
- 11.
- 12. US-275 Expressway ■ 1988 ExpresswaySystem Regional Connectivity New priority to complete the Expressway System Build Nebraska Original intent to developing Expressway
- 13. 2 Plus 2Approach Criteria ■ Existing lanes Remain in place Asset Preservation Resurface ■ New lanes Offset of existing New & Reconstruction New embankment & pavement Goals ■ Stay consistent with 2+2 concept ■ Minimize Impacts to existing New lanes crossing over the existing lanes Analyze the system
- 14. Project Scope ■ 4-laneDivided Expressway Majority of project to use 2+2 Concept Construction of a new bypass around Scribner Pebble Creek Levee System Project Length: 18.5 miles Total Project Cost $109M
- 15.
- 16. Owner’s Representative ■ Specializein Guiding DOT’s ■ Role Procurement Engineering Permitting ROW Activities SupportThroughout
- 18. RFQ ■ Advertised 9/6/17 ■SOQ’s Due 11/17/17 ■ Evaluated Tech. Review Committee ■ Announced 1/12/18 Request For Qualifications
- 19. Graham Group Werner Construction WSPUSA Inc. Olsson Graham-Werner JV Hawkins DBTeam Kiewit Inf. Co. Hawkins Construction Clarkson Construction Burns & McDonnell Alfred Benesch & Co. Kiewit Inf. Co. Kiewit Engineering Felsburg Holt & Ullevig
- 20.
- 21. E I S ■Environmental Impact Statement 404 & 408 Wetland Reserve Program ■ One Federal Decision Expedite & Streamline 2 –Year NEPA Process
- 22.
- 25. Risk Management Owner Contractor ■Best Suited ■ Cost $$$ ■ Schedule Transfer
- 26. Design OWNER ■ Preliminary Design ■Initiate NEPA & Permitting ■ Begin ROW Activities ■ Quality Reviews BUILDER ■ Final Design ■ Complete ROW ■ Final Permitting ■ Utility Conflicts ■ Additional Survey ■ Design Quality
- 27. Owner’s Role inConstruction Owner Project Oversight Observe QA/QC ContractInvoice Conflict Resolution
- 28.
- 29. Where are wegoing?
- 30. Bridging the Gaps ■ PreliminaryEngineering (Concept) ■ Procurement Documents
- 31.
- 32.
- 33. Request For Proposal •VOLUME 1 – Instructions to Proposers (ITP) • VOLUME 2 – Contract • Design Build Contract • Technical Provisions • VOLUME 3 – Reference Documents RFP
- 34. Procurement Process Draft DocumentsRFP Evaluation & Selection Develop Concept and Cost BestValueIndustry Review
- 37. 275 Corridor Scribner –WestPoint ■ Award a Design-BuildContractor in late 2019 ■ Final Design and Construction Norfolk –West Point ■ RFQ released for design and environmental services ■ Phase 1 – Preliminary Design and NEPA ■ Phase 2 – Final Design for a portion of the corridor
- 39.
Editor's Notes
- #14 kyle
- #19 Provides the details for the Submittal of Qualifications (SOQ) SOQ’s identify the teams and important personnel We went through a Q/A phase and issued 2 addenda to respond to questions and concerns NDOT had a technical review committee perform the SOQ evaluations Decision announced at the beginning of the year
- #20 Similarities across the teams that are positive Construction entities with design-build experience Large, international design firms with design-build experience Design firms more prominent locally included
- #31 Provides the details for the Submittal of Qualifications (SOQ) SOQ’s identify the teams and important personnel We went through a Q/A phase and issued 2 addenda to respond to questions and concerns NDOT had a technical review committee perform the SOQ evaluations Decision announced at the beginning of the year
- #34 - Following a typical process 3 Volumes (or Books or Parts) ITP – Lays out what needs to be in the proposals. Gives technical, financial, schedule requirements. Lays out the evaluation criteria at a high level. Standardizes the proposal for ease of review (and preparation) Reference Documents Non contractual unless referenced in Preliminary Engineering and associated documentation Contract – What NDOT and the design builder sign Commercial Terms (who pays for what) Technical Requirements for Design & Construction