The document discusses Compton scattering and the Compton effect. It defines the Compton effect as an interaction between a photon and loosely bound electron that results in the photon being scattered at a lower energy and the electron ejected. Key equations presented include:
- The Compton shift equation relating the wavelength shift to scattering angle and Compton wavelength.
- Relationships between scattering angle and recoil angle, scattered photon energy as a function of incident energy and angle.
- Expressions for the differential Klein-Nishina cross section and distributions of scattered photon energy and recoil electron kinetic energy.
CHAPTER 6 Quantum Mechanics II
6.0 Partial differentials
6.1 The Schrödinger Wave Equation
6.2 Expectation Values
6.3 Infinite Square-Well Potential
6.4 Finite Square-Well Potential
6.5 Three-Dimensional Infinite-Potential Well
6.6 Simple Harmonic Oscillator
6.7 Barriers and Tunneling in some books an extra chapter due to its technical importance
The Compton effect is the result of a high-energy photon colliding with a target, which releases loosely bound electrons from the outer shell of the atom or molecule .
DOWNLOAD THE POWERPOINT FILE FROM HERE:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/d8zbqyvc81pgg5w/compton%20effect.pptx?dl=0
Describing Compton Effect from Quantum Mechanics. Presented in East West University.
interaction of ionizing radiation
1) Interaction of photon with matter
2) Interaction of Electron and proton with matter
3)Interaction of Neutron with matter
A geometrical model of the electron is illustrated. Pair production and annihilation processes is described. Origin of electric charge and the the fine structure constant reviewed. Quantum mechanical description of electric and magnetic field lines at the Planck scale is depicted
CHAPTER 6 Quantum Mechanics II
6.0 Partial differentials
6.1 The Schrödinger Wave Equation
6.2 Expectation Values
6.3 Infinite Square-Well Potential
6.4 Finite Square-Well Potential
6.5 Three-Dimensional Infinite-Potential Well
6.6 Simple Harmonic Oscillator
6.7 Barriers and Tunneling in some books an extra chapter due to its technical importance
The Compton effect is the result of a high-energy photon colliding with a target, which releases loosely bound electrons from the outer shell of the atom or molecule .
DOWNLOAD THE POWERPOINT FILE FROM HERE:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/d8zbqyvc81pgg5w/compton%20effect.pptx?dl=0
Describing Compton Effect from Quantum Mechanics. Presented in East West University.
interaction of ionizing radiation
1) Interaction of photon with matter
2) Interaction of Electron and proton with matter
3)Interaction of Neutron with matter
A geometrical model of the electron is illustrated. Pair production and annihilation processes is described. Origin of electric charge and the the fine structure constant reviewed. Quantum mechanical description of electric and magnetic field lines at the Planck scale is depicted
A geometrical model of the electron is illustrated. Pair production and annihilation processes is described. Origin of electric charge and the fine structure constant reviewed. Quantum mechanical description of electric and magnetic field lines at the Planck scale is depicted.
A geometrical model of the electron is shown as a closed-loop standing wave. The charge path is in the form of rotating Hopf link generating a toroidal swept surface with circumference equal to the Compton wavelength. A precessing epitrochoid charge path composed of two orthogonal spinors with toroidal & poloidal current loop components of 2:1 rotary octave resulting in observed 1/2 spin. Electric charge arises a result of a slight precession due to imbalance of electrostatic & magnetostatic energy characterized by a whirl no. equal to the inverse fine structure constant. Quantum mechanical description of electric & magnetic field lines at the Planck scale is depicted.
Study on the dependency of steady state response on the ratio of larmor and r...eSAT Journals
Abstract In this project we simulate with very high accuracy specially to study the dependency of the steady state power and dispersion output on the ratio (r) between Larmor and Rabi frequency for the electron spin resonance experiment by the matlab software (version 7.9.0.529(R2009b)). Where the sample material (DPPH) has been kept in a strong static magnetic field (B0) and in orthogonal direction a high frequency electromagnetic field (B1(t)) has been applied. We divide our simulation into two parts. In the first part we ignore the terms and observe the dependency of the power maximum on the amplitude of the oscillating e.m. field B1 (for fixed (ωL) Larmor frequency) and on ωL (for fixed B1). Also observe a clear shift (Δω) of the power maxima (Pmax) from ωL. In our second part we consider the term and the ratio (r) between Larmor and Rabi frequency and observe the shift (Δω) of the power maxima (Pmax) from ωL and change in peak to peak line width (ΔBPP) with B1 both depends upon the ratio r. we consider various range of r ([0.83,5], [16,100], [88.3,500], [1000,2000], [833.3,5000]) and observe these dependency. We observe as the ratio of r increases the output i.e. shift (Δω) and the change in ΔBPP with B1 decreases and converges to the case of neglecting terms. We also observe the shift (Δω) follows some non linear relationship with B1. Keywords: E.S.R., Larmor, Rabi, Ratio r, Spin
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
2. COMPTON EFFECT
• WHAT IS COMPTON EFFECT ?
• COMPTON SHIFT .
• RELATION BETWEEN SCATTERING ANGLE AND RECOIL ANGLE.
• SCATTERED PHOTON ENERGY AS A FUNCTION OF INCIDENT PHOTON ENERGY.
• ENERGY TRANSFER TO RECOIL ELECTRON.
• DIFFERENTIAL ELECTRONIC CROSS SECTION FOR COMPTON SCATTERING, SCATTERING ANGLE AND RECOIL ANGLE.
• DIFFERENTIAL KLEIN–NISHINA ENERGY TRANSFER CROSS SECTION.
• ENERGY DISTRIBUTION OF RECOIL ELECTRONS.
• TOTAL ELECTRONIC KLEIN–NISHINA CROSS SECTION FOR COMPTON SCATTERING.
• ELECTRONIC ENERGY TRANSFER CROSS SECTION FOR COMPTON EFFECT.
• BINDING ENERGY EFFECTS AND CORRECTIONS.
• COMPTON ATOMIC CROSS SECTION, MASS ATTENUATION COEFFICIENT AND MASS ENERGY TRANSFER COEFFICIENT.
3. WHAT IS COMPTON EFFECT
• An interaction of a photon of energy
ℎ𝜈 with a loosely bound orbital
electron of an absorber is called
Compton effect.(see
fig 1). This phenomenon was
discovered by ARTHUR COMPTON
• A photon, referred to as a scattered
photon with energy ℎ𝑣′ that is smaller
than the incident photon energy ℎ𝜈, is
produced in Compton effect and an
electron, referred to as a Compton
(recoil) electron, is ejected from the
atom with kinetic energy 𝐸𝑘.
Fig. 1) Diagrammatic representation of Compton Effect
4. WHAT IS COMPTON EFFECT
• A typical Compton effect interaction is
shown in Fig. 2. Here;
• 𝜃 = Scattering angle of the Scattered
Photon
∅= Scattering angle of the recoil electron
𝑃𝑣= Momentum of photon before collision
𝑃𝑣′= Momentum of photon after collision
𝑃𝑒= Momentum of the recoil electron.
Fig. 2) A schematic diagram representing Compton effect.
5. COMPTON WAVELENGTH SHIFT EQUATION
• The amount by which the light's
wavelength changes is called the Compton
shift, and is given by the equation:-
• 𝜆= Wavelength of incident photon
=
2𝜋ħ
hv
𝜆′
= Wavelength of scattered photon
=
2𝜋ħ
h𝑣′
∆𝜆= Difference between the two
wavelength
𝜆𝐶= Compton wavelength of the electron
𝜆𝐶 =
ℎ
𝑚𝑒𝑐
=
2𝜋ħc
𝑚𝑒𝑐2
= 0.0243 Å
• ∆𝜆 = 𝜆′
− 𝜆
= 𝜆𝐶 (1 − cos 𝜃)
6. COMPTON WAVELENGTH SHIFT EQUATION
Before Compton Interaction After Compton Interaction
Total Energy before interaction
hν + 𝑚𝑒𝑐2
Total Energy after interaction
hν + 𝐸𝐾𝑚𝑒𝑐2
Momentum before interaction (X-axis)
ℎ𝑣
𝑐
Momentum after Interaction
ℎ𝑣′
𝑐
cos 𝜃 + 𝑃𝑒 cos ɸ
Momentum before interaction (Y-axis)
0
Momentum after Interaction
ℎ𝑣′
𝑐
sin 𝜃 − 𝑃𝑒 sin ɸ
7. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCATTERING ANGLE AND
RECOIL ANGLE
• cot
𝜃
2
= (1 + 𝜖) tan ɸ
• 𝜖 =
ℎ𝑣
𝑚𝑒𝑐2
• ε = incident photon energy hν normalized to
electron rest mass energy (𝑚𝑒𝑐2
= 0.511
keV)
• This figure the relationship between the
recoil electron ∅ and photon scattering
angle 𝜃 for various values of 𝜖
• Stating that for a given θ, the higher is the
incident photon energy hν or the higher is ε,
the smaller is the recoil electron angle ɸ.
8. SCATTERED PHOTON ENERGY AS FUNCTION OF
INCIDENT PHOTON ENERGY
AND PHOTON SCATTERING ANGLE
• ℎ𝑣′ = ℎ𝑣
1+𝜀 2−𝜀 𝜀+2 cos2 ɸ
( 1+𝜀 2−𝜀2 cos2 ɸ
• Scattered photon energy hν’ against the
incident photon energy hν for various
scattering angles 𝜃 in the range from 0° to
180°,
the following conclusion can be said:-
9. SCATTERED PHOTON ENERGY AS FUNCTION OF
INCIDENT PHOTON ENERGY
AND PHOTON SCATTERING ANGLE
1. For θ = 0; ɸ = ½ π
Energy of the scattered photon hν’ equals the
energy of the incident photon hν, Since in this
case no energy is transferred to the recoil
electron, (Which is just classical Thomson
scattering.)
2. For θ > 0;
The energy of the scattered photon saturates at
high values of hν.
The higher the scattering angle 𝜃, the lower is
the value of hν’.
10. SCATTERED PHOTON ENERGY AS FUNCTION OF
INCIDENT PHOTON ENERGY
AND PHOTON SCATTERING ANGLE
3. For 𝜃 =
1
2
𝜋; ɸ =
1
2
𝜋
Remember! -cot
𝜃
2
= 1 + 𝜖 tan ɸ
ℎ𝑣′
=
ℎ𝑣
1 + 𝜀
Which after a series of calculation, will give us 0.511
MeV.
4. For 𝜃 = 𝜋; ɸ = 0
ℎ𝑣′ =
ℎ𝑣
1 + 2𝜀
Which after a series of calculation, will give us 0.255
MeV.
5. The above two points shows that photons scattered
with 𝜃 >
1
2
𝜋, cannot exceed 511 Kev in Kinetic
Energy.
More over the maximum energy for back scatter
cannot exceed 0.255 MeV.*
11. COMPTON SCATTERING FUNCTION
• Compton scatter fraction 𝑓′𝐶 ℎ𝜈, 𝜃 ,
can be define as the ratio between the scattered
photon energy hν’ to the incident photon
energy hν. From the previous equation
we can write
12. COMPTON SCATTERING FUNCTION
• Using this equation, we can plot a graph against
scattering angle 𝜃 for various incident photon
of energies ℎ𝜈 in the range form 10 MeV to 100
MeV
13. COMPTON SCATTERING FUNCTION
• Using this equation, The following features are
notable.:-
1. hν = hν’ for all hν at 𝜃 = 0
𝑓’𝑐 (hν,𝜃) 𝜃 = 0 = 1
for all hν from 0 to infinity.
2. For a given hν, as 𝜃 increases, the Compton
scattering factor decreases gradually to level of
at
3. For a given scattering angle 𝜃, the larger is the
incident photon energy, the smaller is the
Compton Scattering Factor 𝑓′𝐶 (ℎ𝜈, 𝜃)
14. ENERGY TRANSFER TO COMPTON RECOIL ELECTRON
• Kinetic energy of the Compton (recoil)
electron 𝐸𝑘
𝑐
(ℎ𝜈, 𝜃) depends on photon
energy hν and photon scattering angle 𝜃.
The relationship is determined using
conservation of energy.
From which we get;
15. ENERGY TRANSFER TO COMPTON RECOIL ELECTRON
• We insert the equation to get;
For a Photon energy hν, the recoil electron kinetic
energy ranges
from a minimum value of
(𝐸𝑘
𝑐
)min = 0 for scattering angle 𝜃 = 0
(forward scattering)
corresponding to electron recoil angle ɸ = ½ 𝜋,
To a maximum value of Scattering angle = 𝜃 = 0
(Backscattering)
corresponding to electron recoil angle ɸ = 𝜃
The Figure, with solid curves, shows a plot of 𝑓𝑐(ℎ𝜈, 𝜃) against
scattering angle 𝜃 for various incident photon energies in the
range from 10 keV to 100 MeV.
16. ENERGY TRANSFER TO COMPTON RECOIL ELECTRON
• We insert the equation to get;
For a Photon energy hν, the recoil electron kinetic
energy ranges
from a minimum value of
(𝐸𝑘
𝑐
)min = 0 for scattering angle 𝜃 = 0
(forward scattering)
corresponding to electron recoil angle ɸ = ½ 𝜋,
To a maximum value of Scattering angle = 𝜃 = 𝜋
(Backscattering)
corresponding to electron recoil angle ɸ =0
The ratio of the kinetic energy of the
Compton (recoil) electron 𝐸𝑘
𝑐
(ℎ𝜈, 𝜃) to the
energy of the incident photon ℎ𝜈,
represents the fraction of the incident
photon energy that is transferred to the
Compton electron in a Compton effect.
This is called the Compton energy transfer
fraction 𝑓𝑐(ℎ𝜈, 𝜃).
17. DIFFERENTIAL ELECTRONIC CROSS SECTION FOR
COMPTON SCATTERING.
• Oskar Klein and Yoshio Nishina in 1928, derived an expression for the cross-section
of Compton interaction between a proton and a free electron.
And is given as
• The Differential Klein–Nishina electronic cross section
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑Ω
, which is
19. THE KLEIN-NISHINA FACTOR IS PLOTTED AGAINST THE SCATTERING ANGLE 𝜃 FOR VARIOUS
VALUES OF THE ENERGY PARAMETER
𝜖 =
ℎ𝑣
𝑚𝑒𝑐2
ε = incident photon energy
hν normalized to electron
rest mass energy (𝑚𝑒𝑐2 =
0.511 keV)
20. • KLEIN–NISHINA ATOMIC FORM FACTOR FOR
COMPTON EFFECT 𝐹𝐾𝑁AGAINST SCATTERING ANGLE
𝜃
• So basically,
1. At low 𝜀, the probability of forward
scattering and backward scattering is
equal.
2. As 𝜀 increases, scattering becomes
increasingly more forward peek and
backscattering rapidly diminishes.
21. DIFFERENTIAL ELECTRONIC CROSS SECTION PER UNIT
SCATTERING ANGLE
DIFFERENTIAL
ELECTRONIC
CROSS SECTION
PER UNIT
SCATTERING
ANGLE
• It is important to consider the directional
distribution of scattered photons and
recoil electrons in the form of the cross
section per unit scattering angle 𝜃 and
per unit recoil angle ɸ.
• The differential electronic cross section
per unit scattering angle is obtained from
differential electronic cross section per
unit solid angle
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑Ω
𝑑Ω = 2𝜋 sin𝜃 𝑑𝜃
22. DIFFERENTIAL ELECTRONIC CROSS SECTION PER UNIT
SCATTERING ANGLE
• The differential cross section
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑𝜃
is plotted
against scattering angle 𝜃
• Differential electronic cross section per unit
scattering angle 𝜃 for Compton effect (
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑𝜃
)
against scattering angle 𝜃 (solid curves) and
differential electronic cross sections per unit
recoil angle ɸ for Compton effect
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑𝜑
against recoil angle 𝜑 (dashed curves)
for four values of ε (0, 0.1, 1, and 10), the
incident photon energy hν normalized to the
rest mass energy of the electron 𝑚𝑒𝑐2
. The
cross sections are drawn on a cartesian plot
23. DIFFERENTIAL CROSS SECTION PER UNIT RECOIL
ANGLE
• The differential electronic cross section
per unit recoil angle
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝑑𝜑
is determined from
the differential electronic cross section
per unit scattering angle
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝑑𝜃
which is
written as follows.
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑ɸ
=
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑𝜃
𝑑𝜃
𝑑ɸ
After Differentiating
Both Sides
24. • After incorporating the previous
equations, it is expressed with the
following two equations
DIFFERENTIAL CROSS SECTION PER UNIT RECOIL
ANGLE
25. DIFFERENTIAL ELECTRONIC CROSS SECTION PER UNIT
SCATTERING ANGLE
• The differential cross section
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑𝜃
is plotted
against scattering angle 𝜃
• Differential electronic cross section per unit
scattering angle 𝜃 for Compton effect (
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑𝜃
)
against scattering angle 𝜃 (solid curves) and
differential electronic cross sections per unit
recoil angle ɸ for Compton effect
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑𝜑
against recoil angle 𝜑 (dashed curves)
for four values of ε (0, 0.1, 1, and 10), the
incident photon energy hν normalized to the
rest mass energy of the electron 𝑚𝑒𝑐2
. The
cross sections are drawn on a cartesian plot
26. The Following in noticed:-
1. The area under the 𝑑𝑒
𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑ɸ
decreases
with increasing 𝜀.
2. With increasing 𝜀, the electron curve
becomes more and more
asymmetrical and for large ε exhibits
only one peak which moves to
increasingly smaller angles ɸ.
DIFFERENTIAL CROSS SECTION PER UNIT RECOIL
ANGLE
27. DIFFERENTIAL CROSS SECTION PER UNIT RECOIL
ANGLE
The angular distribution of recoil electrons is
present only in the forward hemisphere; however, it
is zero in forward direction ɸ = 0 and exhibits
maxima at values of ɸ which depend on photon
energy hν.
In other words, larger the ε, the
smaller is the angle at which maximum occurs.
28. DIFFERENTIAL KLEIN–NISHINA ENERGY TRANSFER
CROSS SECTION
• The differential electronic energy transfer coefficient
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑡𝑟
𝑑Ω
for the Compton
effect is calculated by multiplying the differential electronic cross section of
&
We GET
𝜖 =
ℎ𝑣
𝑚𝑒𝑐2
ε = incident photon energy
hν normalized to electron
rest mass energy (𝑚𝑒𝑐2 =
0.511 keV)
29. ENERGY DISTRIBUTION FOR RECOIL ELECTRON
• The Energy distribution for recoil electron is given by the equation:-
• Where;
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑Ω
=
𝑟𝑒
2
2
1 + cos2 𝜃 𝐹𝐾𝑁
𝑑Ω
𝑑𝜃
= 2𝜋 sin 𝜃
𝑑𝜃
𝑑𝐸𝑘
= ℎ𝜈
2𝜀sin2 𝜃
2
1 + 2𝜀sin2 θ
2
30. ENERGY DISTRIBUTION FOR RECOIL ELECTRON
The differential electronic cross section
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑𝐸𝐾
is plotted against the kinetic energy
𝐸𝑘
𝐶
of the recoil electron for various values
of incident photon electron.
The following features can be recognized :
-
1. The distribution of kinetic energies
given to the Compton recoil electrons
is essentially flat from zero almost to
the maximum electron kinetic energy
𝐸𝐾
𝐶
𝑀𝐴𝑋
where a sharp increase in
concentration occurs.
2. 𝐸𝐾
𝐶
𝑀𝐴𝑋
= ℎ𝑣
2𝜀
1+2𝜀
31. TOTAL ELECTRONIC KLEIN–NISHINA CROSS SECTION
FOR COMPTON SCATTERING
• This is calculated by integrating the differential electronic cross section per unit
solid angle over the whole solid angle to get :-
The numerical value of 𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
can be obtained by determining the area under the
𝑑𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
𝑑𝜃
curve for a given 𝜀.
32. TOTAL ELECTRONIC KLEIN–NISHINA CROSS SECTION
FOR COMPTON SCATTERING
• 2 Cases;
1. For small incident photon energies :-
Which is almost equal to Thomson’s results =
2. For very large incident photon energies :-
33. TOTAL ELECTRONIC KLEIN–NISHINA CROSS SECTION
FOR COMPTON SCATTERING
• At low photon energies (𝐸𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
) is
approximately equal to Thompson cross
section, which is independent of Photon
energy, with its value of 0.665b.
• Intermediate Photon energy
(𝐸𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
)decreases gradually with photon
energy.
• The Compton electronic cross section
(𝑒𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
) is independent of atomic number Z
of the absorber, since in the Compton
theory the electron is assumed to be free
and stationary, i.e., the electron’s binding
energy to the atom is assumed to be
negligible in comparison with the photon
energy hν.
34. ELECTRONIC ENERGY TRANSFER CROSS SECTION
FOR COMPTON EFFECT
• This is obtained by integrating the differential electronic energy transfer cress
section
d(𝑒𝜎𝑐
𝐾𝑁)𝑡𝑟
𝑑𝛺
of overall photon scattering angle from 0 to 180, and also over
recoil angle , from 0 to 90.
35. BINDING ENERGY EFFECTS CORRECTIONS
• Compton atomic cross section aσC plotted
against incident photon energy hν for
various absorbers ranging from hydrogen
to lead. The dashed curves represent
(𝑎𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
)
data calculated with Klein–Nishina free-
electron relationship
• The solid curves represent the (𝑎𝜎𝐶) data
that incorporate the binding effects of
orbital electrons
36. BINDING ENERGY EFFECTS CORRECTIONS
• For a given Z of the absorber, the lower is
the incident photon energy hν, the larger
is the discrepancy between the measured
(𝑎𝜎𝐶) and the calculated (𝑎𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
) .
• For a given incident photon energy hν, the
higher is the atomic number Z of the
absorber, the more pronounced is the
discrepancy
37. BINDING ENERGY EFFECTS CORRECTIONS
• Incoherent scattering function S(x, Z)
plotted against the momentum transfer
variable x where x =
sin
𝜃
2
𝜆
for various
absorbers in the range from hydrogen to
lead
• For large values of x the incoherent
scattering function S(x, Z) saturates at Z
39. COMPTON MASS ENERGY TRANSFER COEFFICIENT
• The Compton mass energy transfer
coefficient
𝜎𝐶 𝑡𝑟
𝜌
is calculated from the
mass attenuation coefficient
𝜎𝐶
𝜌
using the
standard relationship
𝑓𝑐- Mean energy transfer fraction for the
Compton effect
Figure shows the (𝑎𝜎𝐶) and (𝑎𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
)data for lead in addition, it
also shows the binding energy effect on the Compton atomic
energy transfer coefficients of lead by displaying (a𝜎𝐶)𝑡𝑟and
(𝑎𝜎𝐶
𝐾𝑁
)𝑡𝑟
41. IMPORTANT FORMULAS
Differential electronic Cross
Section for Compton Scattering.
Differential Electronic
Cross Section per unit
Scattering angle
Differential Klein–Nishina
Energy Transfer Cross
Section