SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Combinatorics of 4-dimensional Resultant Polytopes
Vissarion Fisikopoulos
Joint work with Alicia Dickenstein (U. Buenos Aires) & Ioannis Z. Emiris (UoA)
Dept. of Informatics & Telecommunications, University of Athens
ISSAC 2013
Resultant polytopes
Algebra: generalization of the resultant polynomial degree
Geometry: Minkowski summands of secondary polytopes
Applications: support computation → discriminant and resultant
computation
Polytopes and Algebra
Given n + 1 polynomials on n variables.
Supports (set of exponents of monomials with non-zero coefficient)
A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn
.
The resultant R is the polynomial in the coefficients of a system of
polynomials which vanishes if there exists a common root in the
torus of the given polynomials.
The resultant polytope N(R), is the convex hull of the support of R,
i.e. the Newton polytope of the resultant.
f0(x) = ax2
+ b
f1(x) = cx2
+ dx + e
Polytopes and Algebra
Given n + 1 polynomials on n variables.
Supports (set of exponents of monomials with non-zero coefficient)
A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn
.
The resultant R is the polynomial in the coefficients of a system of
polynomials which vanishes if there exists a common root in the
torus of the given polynomials.
The resultant polytope N(R), is the convex hull of the support of R,
i.e. the Newton polytope of the resultant.
A0
A1
f0(x) = ax2
+ b
f1(x) = cx2
+ dx + e
Polytopes and Algebra
Given n + 1 polynomials on n variables.
Supports (set of exponents of monomials with non-zero coefficient)
A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn
.
The resultant R is the polynomial in the coefficients of a system of
polynomials which vanishes if there exists a common root in the
torus of the given polynomials.
The resultant polytope N(R), is the convex hull of the support of R,
i.e. the Newton polytope of the resultant.
A0
A1
R(a, b, c, d, e) = ad2
b + c2
b2
− 2caeb + a2
e2
f0(x) = ax2
+ b
f1(x) = cx2
+ dx + e
Polytopes and Algebra
Given n + 1 polynomials on n variables.
Supports (set of exponents of monomials with non-zero coefficient)
A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn
.
The resultant R is the polynomial in the coefficients of a system of
polynomials which vanishes if there exists a common root in the
torus of the given polynomials.
The resultant polytope N(R), is the convex hull of the support of R,
i.e. the Newton polytope of the resultant.
A0
A1
N(R)R(a, b, c, d, e) = ad2
b + c2
b2
− 2caeb + a2
e2
f0(x) = ax2
+ b
f1(x) = cx2
+ dx + e
Polytopes and Algebra
The case of linear polynomials
A0
A1
N(R)
A2
4-dimensional Birkhoff polytope
f0(x, y) = ax + by + c
f1(x, y) = dx + ey + f
f2(x, y) = gx + hy + i
a b c
d e f
g h i
R(a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i) =
Polytopes and Algebra
A0
A1
Q: How N(R) looks like in the general case
A2
f0(x, y) = axy2
+ x4
y + c
f1(x, y) = dx + ey
f2(x, y) = gx2
+ hy + i
Resultant polytopes: Motivation
Algebra: useful to express the solvability of polynomial systems,
generalizes the notion of the degree of the resultant
Geometry: Minkowski summands of secondary polytopes, equival.
classes of secondary vertices, generalize Birkhoff polytopes
Applications: support computation → discriminant and resultant
computation, implicitization of parametric hypersurfaces
Existing work
[GKZ’90] Univariate case / general dimensional N(R)
[Sturmfels’94] Multivariate case / up to 3 dimensional N(R)
Existing work
[GKZ’90] Univariate case / general dimensional N(R)
[Sturmfels’94] Multivariate case / up to 3 dimensional N(R)
One step beyond... 4-dimensional N(R)
Polytope P ⊆ R4
; f-vector is the vector of its face cardinalities.
Call vertices, edges, ridges, facets, the 0,1,2,3-d, resp., faces of P.
f-vectors of 4-dimensional N(R)
(5, 10, 10, 5)
(6, 15, 18, 9)
(8, 20, 21, 9)
(9, 22, 21, 8)
.
.
.
(17, 49, 48, 16)
(17, 49, 49, 17)
(17, 50, 50, 17)
(18, 51, 48, 15)
(18, 51, 49, 16)
(18, 52, 50, 16)
(18, 52, 51, 17)
(18, 53, 51, 16)
(18, 53, 53, 18)
(18, 54, 54, 18)
(19, 54, 52, 17)
(19, 55, 51, 15)
(19, 55, 52, 16)
(19, 55, 54, 18)
(19, 56, 54, 17)
(19, 56, 56, 19)
(19, 57, 57, 19)
(20, 58, 54, 16)
(20, 59, 57, 18)
(20, 60, 60, 20)
(21, 62, 60, 19)
(21, 63, 63, 21)
(22, 66, 66, 22)
One step beyond... 4-dimensional N(R)
Polytope P ⊆ R4
; f-vector is the vector of its face cardinalities.
Call vertices, edges, ridges, facets, the 0,1,2,3-d, resp., faces of P.
f-vectors of 4-dimensional N(R)
(5, 10, 10, 5)
(6, 15, 18, 9)
(8, 20, 21, 9)
(9, 22, 21, 8)
.
.
.
(17, 49, 48, 16)
(17, 49, 49, 17)
(17, 50, 50, 17)
(18, 51, 48, 15)
(18, 51, 49, 16)
(18, 52, 50, 16)
(18, 52, 51, 17)
(18, 53, 51, 16)
(18, 53, 53, 18)
(18, 54, 54, 18)
(19, 54, 52, 17)
(19, 55, 51, 15)
(19, 55, 52, 16)
(19, 55, 54, 18)
(19, 56, 54, 17)
(19, 56, 56, 19)
(19, 57, 57, 19)
(20, 58, 54, 16)
(20, 59, 57, 18)
(20, 60, 60, 20)
(21, 62, 60, 19)
(21, 63, 63, 21)
(22, 66, 66, 22)
One step beyond... 4-dimensional N(R)
Polytope P ⊆ R4
; f-vector is the vector of its face cardinalities.
Call vertices, edges, ridges, facets, the 0,1,2,3-d, resp., faces of P.
f-vectors of 4-dimensional N(R)
(5, 10, 10, 5)
(6, 15, 18, 9)
(8, 20, 21, 9)
(9, 22, 21, 8)
.
.
.
(17, 49, 48, 16)
(17, 49, 49, 17)
(17, 50, 50, 17)
(18, 51, 48, 15)
(18, 51, 49, 16)
(18, 52, 50, 16)
(18, 52, 51, 17)
(18, 53, 51, 16)
(18, 53, 53, 18)
(18, 54, 54, 18)
(19, 54, 52, 17)
(19, 55, 51, 15)
(19, 55, 52, 16)
(19, 55, 54, 18)
(19, 56, 54, 17)
(19, 56, 56, 19)
(19, 57, 57, 19)
(20, 58, 54, 16)
(20, 59, 57, 18)
(20, 60, 60, 20)
(21, 62, 60, 19)
(21, 63, 63, 21)
(22, 66, 66, 22)
Computation of resultant polytopes
respol software [Emiris-F-Konaxis-Pe˜naranda ’12]
lower bounds
C++, CGAL (Computational Geometry Algorithms Library)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/respol
Alternative algorithm that utilizes tropical geometry (GFan library)
[Jensen-Yu ’11]
Computation of resultant polytopes
respol software [Emiris-F-Konaxis-Pe˜naranda ’12]
lower bounds
C++, CGAL (Computational Geometry Algorithms Library)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/respol
Alternative algorithm that utilizes tropical geometry (GFan library)
[Jensen-Yu ’11]
Main result
Theorem
Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn
with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are
degenerations of the polytopes in following cases.
(i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with
f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5).
(ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector
(10, 26, 25, 9).
(iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of
ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28,
and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight.
Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces.
Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3.
Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
Main result
Theorem
Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn
with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are
degenerations of the polytopes in following cases.
(i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with
f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5).
(ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector
(10, 26, 25, 9).
(iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of
ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28,
and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight.
Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces.
Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3.
Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
Main result
Theorem
Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn
with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are
degenerations of the polytopes in following cases.
(i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with
f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5).
(ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector
(10, 26, 25, 9).
(iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of
ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28,
and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight.
Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces.
Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3.
Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
Main result
Theorem
Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn
with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are
degenerations of the polytopes in following cases.
(i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with
f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5).
(ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector
(10, 26, 25, 9).
(iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of
ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28,
and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight.
Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces.
Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3.
Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
Main result
Theorem
Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn
with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are
degenerations of the polytopes in following cases.
(i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with
f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5).
(ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector
(10, 26, 25, 9).
(iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of
ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28,
and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight.
Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces.
Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3.
Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions
A subdivision S of A0 + A1 + · · · + An is mixed when its cells have
expressions as Minkowski sums of convex hulls of point subsets in Ai’s.
Example
mixed subdivision S of A0 + A1 + A2
A0
A1
A2
Proposition (Sturmfels’94)
A regular mixed subdivision S of A0 + A1 + · · · + An corresponds to a
face of N(R) which is the Minkowski sum of the resultant polytopes of
the cells (subsystems) of S.
Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions
A subdivision S of A0 + A1 + · · · + An is mixed when its cells have
expressions as Minkowski sums of convex hulls of point subsets in Ai’s.
Example
mixed subdivision S of A0 + A1 + A2
A0
A1
A2
Proposition (Sturmfels’94)
A regular mixed subdivision S of A0 + A1 + · · · + An corresponds to a
face of N(R) which is the Minkowski sum of the resultant polytopes of
the cells (subsystems) of S.
Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions
Example
white, blue, red cells → N(R) vertex
purple cell → N(R) segment
turquoise cell → N(R) triangle
Mink. sum of N(R) triangle and N(R) segmentsubd. S of A0 + A1 + A2
Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions
Example
white, blue, red cells → N(R) vertex
purple cell → N(R) segment
turquoise cell → N(R) triangle
Mink. sum of N(R) triangle and N(R) segmentsubd. S of A0 + A1 + A2
Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions
Example
white, blue, red cells → N(R) vertex
purple cell → N(R) segment
turquoise cell → N(R) triangle
Mink. sum of N(R) triangle and N(R) segmentsubd. S of A0 + A1 + A2
Tool (2): Input genericity
Proposition
Input genericity maximizes the number of resultant polytope faces.
Proof idea
N(R∗
) f-vector: (18, 52, 50, 16)
N(R) f-vector: (14, 38, 36, 12)
p
p∗
A0 A1 A2
A0 A1 A2
Tool (2): Input genericity
Proposition
Input genericity maximizes the number of resultant polytope faces.
Proof idea
N(R∗
) f-vector: (18, 52, 50, 16)
N(R) f-vector: (14, 38, 36, 12)
p
p∗
A0 A1 A2
A0 A1 A2
→ For upper bounds on the number of N(R) faces consider generic
inputs, i.e. no parallel edges.
Facets of 4-d resultant polytopes
Lemma
All the possible types of N(R) facets are
resultant facet: 3-d N(R)
prism facet: 2-d N(R) (triangle) + 1-d N(R)
cube facet: 1-d N(R) + 1-d N(R) + 1-d N(R)
3D
Facets of 4-d resultant polytopes
Lemma
All the possible types of N(R) facets are
resultant facet: 3-d N(R)
prism facet: 2-d N(R) (triangle) + 1-d N(R)
cube facet: 1-d N(R) + 1-d N(R) + 1-d N(R)
3D
2D
Counting facets
Lemma
There can be at most 9, 9, 4 resultant, prism, cube facets, resp., and this
is tight.
Proof idea
Unique subdivision that corresponds to 4 cube facets
Faces of 4-d resultant polytopes
Lemma
The maximal number of ridges of N(R) is ˜f2 = 66. Moreover,
˜f1 = ˜f0 + 44, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28, and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are
tight.
Elements of proof
[Kalai87]
f1 +
i≥4
(i − 3)fi
2 ≥ df0 −
d + 1
2
,
where fi
2 is the number of 2-faces which are i-gons.
Open problems & a conjecture
Open
The maximum f-vector of a 4d-resultant polytope is (22, 66, 66, 22).
Open
Explain symmetry of f-vectors of 4d-resultant polytopes.
Conjecture
f0(d) ≤ 3 ·
S =d−1 i∈S
˜f0(i)
where S is any multiset with elements in {1, . . . , d − 1}, S := i∈S i,
and ˜f0(i) is the maximum number of vertices of a i-dimensional N(R).
The only bound in terms of d is (3d − 3)2d2
[Sturmfels’94], yielding
˜f0(5) ≤ 1250
whereas our conjecture yields ˜f0(5) ≤ 231.
Open problems & a conjecture
Open
The maximum f-vector of a 4d-resultant polytope is (22, 66, 66, 22).
Open
Explain symmetry of f-vectors of 4d-resultant polytopes.
Conjecture
f0(d) ≤ 3 ·
S =d−1 i∈S
˜f0(i)
where S is any multiset with elements in {1, . . . , d − 1}, S := i∈S i,
and ˜f0(i) is the maximum number of vertices of a i-dimensional N(R).
The only bound in terms of d is (3d − 3)2d2
[Sturmfels’94], yielding
˜f0(5) ≤ 1250
whereas our conjecture yields ˜f0(5) ≤ 231.
Open problems & a conjecture
Open
The maximum f-vector of a 4d-resultant polytope is (22, 66, 66, 22).
Open
Explain symmetry of f-vectors of 4d-resultant polytopes.
Conjecture
f0(d) ≤ 3 ·
S =d−1 i∈S
˜f0(i)
where S is any multiset with elements in {1, . . . , d − 1}, S := i∈S i,
and ˜f0(i) is the maximum number of vertices of a i-dimensional N(R).
The only bound in terms of d is (3d − 3)2d2
[Sturmfels’94], yielding
˜f0(5) ≤ 1250
whereas our conjecture yields ˜f0(5) ≤ 231.
Open problems & a conjecture
Open
The maximum f-vector of a 4d-resultant polytope is (22, 66, 66, 22).
Open
Explain symmetry of f-vectors of 4d-resultant polytopes.
Conjecture
f0(d) ≤ 3 ·
S =d−1 i∈S
˜f0(i)
where S is any multiset with elements in {1, . . . , d − 1}, S := i∈S i,
and ˜f0(i) is the maximum number of vertices of a i-dimensional N(R).
The only bound in terms of d is (3d − 3)2d2
[Sturmfels’94], yielding
˜f0(5) ≤ 1250
whereas our conjecture yields ˜f0(5) ≤ 231.
Thank you!

More Related Content

What's hot

Peperiksaan pertengahan tahun t4 2012 (2)
Peperiksaan pertengahan tahun t4 2012 (2)Peperiksaan pertengahan tahun t4 2012 (2)
Peperiksaan pertengahan tahun t4 2012 (2)
normalamahadi
 
Form 4 formulae and note
Form 4 formulae and noteForm 4 formulae and note
Form 4 formulae and note
smktsj2
 
Discrete mathematic answers of questions
Discrete mathematic answers of questionsDiscrete mathematic answers of questions
Discrete mathematic answers of questions
Samet öztoprak
 
IITJEE - 2009 ii - mathematics
IITJEE - 2009    ii - mathematicsIITJEE - 2009    ii - mathematics
IITJEE - 2009 ii - mathematics
Vasista Vinuthan
 
Jam 2006 Test Papers Mathematical Statistics
Jam 2006 Test Papers Mathematical StatisticsJam 2006 Test Papers Mathematical Statistics
Jam 2006 Test Papers Mathematical Statistics
ashu29
 
Engr 371 final exam april 1996
Engr 371 final exam april 1996Engr 371 final exam april 1996
Engr 371 final exam april 1996
amnesiann
 
Higher Maths 2.1.1 - Polynomials
Higher Maths 2.1.1 - PolynomialsHigher Maths 2.1.1 - Polynomials
Higher Maths 2.1.1 - Polynomials
timschmitz
 

What's hot (20)

Class xii practice questions
Class xii practice questionsClass xii practice questions
Class xii practice questions
 
Maths chapter wise Important questions
Maths chapter wise Important questionsMaths chapter wise Important questions
Maths chapter wise Important questions
 
Cs6702 graph theory and applications Anna University question paper apr may 2...
Cs6702 graph theory and applications Anna University question paper apr may 2...Cs6702 graph theory and applications Anna University question paper apr may 2...
Cs6702 graph theory and applications Anna University question paper apr may 2...
 
Peperiksaan pertengahan tahun t4 2012 (2)
Peperiksaan pertengahan tahun t4 2012 (2)Peperiksaan pertengahan tahun t4 2012 (2)
Peperiksaan pertengahan tahun t4 2012 (2)
 
Q paper I puc-2014(MATHEMATICS)
Q paper I puc-2014(MATHEMATICS)Q paper I puc-2014(MATHEMATICS)
Q paper I puc-2014(MATHEMATICS)
 
Acct bouyuklieva
Acct bouyuklievaAcct bouyuklieva
Acct bouyuklieva
 
Form 4 formulae and note
Form 4 formulae and noteForm 4 formulae and note
Form 4 formulae and note
 
Elliptical curve cryptography
Elliptical curve cryptographyElliptical curve cryptography
Elliptical curve cryptography
 
Discrete mathematic answers of questions
Discrete mathematic answers of questionsDiscrete mathematic answers of questions
Discrete mathematic answers of questions
 
Discrete mathematic answers of questions
Discrete mathematic answers of questionsDiscrete mathematic answers of questions
Discrete mathematic answers of questions
 
IITJEE - 2009 ii - mathematics
IITJEE - 2009    ii - mathematicsIITJEE - 2009    ii - mathematics
IITJEE - 2009 ii - mathematics
 
Ch04
Ch04Ch04
Ch04
 
On sum edge coloring of regular, bipartite and split graphs
On sum edge coloring of regular,  bipartite and split graphsOn sum edge coloring of regular,  bipartite and split graphs
On sum edge coloring of regular, bipartite and split graphs
 
Complex Numbers and Functions. Complex Differentiation
Complex Numbers and Functions. Complex DifferentiationComplex Numbers and Functions. Complex Differentiation
Complex Numbers and Functions. Complex Differentiation
 
Jam 2006 Test Papers Mathematical Statistics
Jam 2006 Test Papers Mathematical StatisticsJam 2006 Test Papers Mathematical Statistics
Jam 2006 Test Papers Mathematical Statistics
 
C3 January 2012 QP
C3 January 2012 QPC3 January 2012 QP
C3 January 2012 QP
 
Engr 371 final exam april 1996
Engr 371 final exam april 1996Engr 371 final exam april 1996
Engr 371 final exam april 1996
 
Power series
Power seriesPower series
Power series
 
Higher Maths 2.1.1 - Polynomials
Higher Maths 2.1.1 - PolynomialsHigher Maths 2.1.1 - Polynomials
Higher Maths 2.1.1 - Polynomials
 
Quadratic functions and Equations.pdf
Quadratic functions and Equations.pdfQuadratic functions and Equations.pdf
Quadratic functions and Equations.pdf
 

Similar to "Combinatorics of 4-dimensional resultant polytopes"

Problem Solving by Computer Finite Element Method
Problem Solving by Computer Finite Element MethodProblem Solving by Computer Finite Element Method
Problem Solving by Computer Finite Element Method
Peter Herbert
 
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test september 20, 2014 with answer key
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test september 20, 2014 with answer keyNbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test september 20, 2014 with answer key
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test september 20, 2014 with answer key
MD Kutubuddin Sardar
 

Similar to "Combinatorics of 4-dimensional resultant polytopes" (20)

Polyhedral computations in computational algebraic geometry and optimization
Polyhedral computations in computational algebraic geometry and optimizationPolyhedral computations in computational algebraic geometry and optimization
Polyhedral computations in computational algebraic geometry and optimization
 
Density theorems for Euclidean point configurations
Density theorems for Euclidean point configurationsDensity theorems for Euclidean point configurations
Density theorems for Euclidean point configurations
 
Polycycles and their elementary decompositions
Polycycles and their elementary decompositionsPolycycles and their elementary decompositions
Polycycles and their elementary decompositions
 
Group {1, −1, i, −i} Cordial Labeling of Product Related Graphs
Group {1, −1, i, −i} Cordial Labeling of Product Related GraphsGroup {1, −1, i, −i} Cordial Labeling of Product Related Graphs
Group {1, −1, i, −i} Cordial Labeling of Product Related Graphs
 
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2005
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2005Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2005
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2005
 
Problem Solving by Computer Finite Element Method
Problem Solving by Computer Finite Element MethodProblem Solving by Computer Finite Element Method
Problem Solving by Computer Finite Element Method
 
High-dimensional polytopes defined by oracles: algorithms, computations and a...
High-dimensional polytopes defined by oracles: algorithms, computations and a...High-dimensional polytopes defined by oracles: algorithms, computations and a...
High-dimensional polytopes defined by oracles: algorithms, computations and a...
 
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2012 with answer key
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2012 with answer keyNbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2012 with answer key
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2012 with answer key
 
Some properties of m sequences over finite field fp
Some properties of m sequences over finite field fpSome properties of m sequences over finite field fp
Some properties of m sequences over finite field fp
 
Graph theory and life
Graph theory and lifeGraph theory and life
Graph theory and life
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test september 20, 2014 with answer key
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test september 20, 2014 with answer keyNbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test september 20, 2014 with answer key
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test september 20, 2014 with answer key
 
Nonlinear perturbed difference equations
Nonlinear perturbed difference equationsNonlinear perturbed difference equations
Nonlinear perturbed difference equations
 
Pure Mathematics Unit 2 - Textbook
Pure Mathematics Unit 2 - TextbookPure Mathematics Unit 2 - Textbook
Pure Mathematics Unit 2 - Textbook
 
Volume and edge skeleton computation in high dimensions
Volume and edge skeleton computation in high dimensionsVolume and edge skeleton computation in high dimensions
Volume and edge skeleton computation in high dimensions
 
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2006
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2006Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2006
Nbhm m. a. and m.sc. scholarship test 2006
 
Fj25991998
Fj25991998Fj25991998
Fj25991998
 
590-Article Text.pdf
590-Article Text.pdf590-Article Text.pdf
590-Article Text.pdf
 
590-Article Text.pdf
590-Article Text.pdf590-Article Text.pdf
590-Article Text.pdf
 
Ramsey Theory
Ramsey TheoryRamsey Theory
Ramsey Theory
 

More from Vissarion Fisikopoulos

A new practical algorithm for volume estimation using annealing of convex bodies
A new practical algorithm for volume estimation using annealing of convex bodiesA new practical algorithm for volume estimation using annealing of convex bodies
A new practical algorithm for volume estimation using annealing of convex bodies
Vissarion Fisikopoulos
 
Geodesic algorithms: an experimental study
Geodesic algorithms: an experimental studyGeodesic algorithms: an experimental study
Geodesic algorithms: an experimental study
Vissarion Fisikopoulos
 

More from Vissarion Fisikopoulos (20)

"Mesh of Periodic Minimal Surfaces in CGAL."
"Mesh of Periodic Minimal Surfaces in CGAL.""Mesh of Periodic Minimal Surfaces in CGAL."
"Mesh of Periodic Minimal Surfaces in CGAL."
 
"Regular triangularions and resultant polytopes."
"Regular triangularions and resultant polytopes." "Regular triangularions and resultant polytopes."
"Regular triangularions and resultant polytopes."
 
"Exact and approximate algorithms for resultant polytopes."
"Exact and approximate algorithms for resultant polytopes." "Exact and approximate algorithms for resultant polytopes."
"Exact and approximate algorithms for resultant polytopes."
 
"An output-sensitive algorithm for computing projections of resultant polytop...
"An output-sensitive algorithm for computing projections of resultant polytop..."An output-sensitive algorithm for computing projections of resultant polytop...
"An output-sensitive algorithm for computing projections of resultant polytop...
 
"Faster Geometric Algorithms via Dynamic Determinant Computation."
"Faster Geometric Algorithms via Dynamic Determinant Computation." "Faster Geometric Algorithms via Dynamic Determinant Computation."
"Faster Geometric Algorithms via Dynamic Determinant Computation."
 
Oracle-based algorithms for high-dimensional polytopes.
Oracle-based algorithms for high-dimensional polytopes.Oracle-based algorithms for high-dimensional polytopes.
Oracle-based algorithms for high-dimensional polytopes.
 
Efficient Volume and Edge-Skeleton Computation for Polytopes Given by Oracles
Efficient Volume and Edge-Skeleton Computation for Polytopes Given by OraclesEfficient Volume and Edge-Skeleton Computation for Polytopes Given by Oracles
Efficient Volume and Edge-Skeleton Computation for Polytopes Given by Oracles
 
Efficient Edge-Skeleton Computation for Polytopes Defined by Oracles
Efficient Edge-Skeleton Computation for Polytopes Defined by OraclesEfficient Edge-Skeleton Computation for Polytopes Defined by Oracles
Efficient Edge-Skeleton Computation for Polytopes Defined by Oracles
 
High-dimensional polytopes defined by oracles: algorithms, computations and a...
High-dimensional polytopes defined by oracles: algorithms, computations and a...High-dimensional polytopes defined by oracles: algorithms, computations and a...
High-dimensional polytopes defined by oracles: algorithms, computations and a...
 
Working with spatial trajectories in Boost Geometry
Working with spatial trajectories in Boost GeometryWorking with spatial trajectories in Boost Geometry
Working with spatial trajectories in Boost Geometry
 
High-dimensional sampling and volume computation
High-dimensional sampling and volume computationHigh-dimensional sampling and volume computation
High-dimensional sampling and volume computation
 
Conctructing Polytopes via a Vertex Oracle
Conctructing Polytopes via a Vertex OracleConctructing Polytopes via a Vertex Oracle
Conctructing Polytopes via a Vertex Oracle
 
Enumeration of 2-level polytopes
Enumeration of 2-level polytopesEnumeration of 2-level polytopes
Enumeration of 2-level polytopes
 
Efficient Random-Walk Methods forApproximating Polytope Volume
Efficient Random-Walk Methods forApproximating Polytope VolumeEfficient Random-Walk Methods forApproximating Polytope Volume
Efficient Random-Walk Methods forApproximating Polytope Volume
 
A new practical algorithm for volume estimation using annealing of convex bodies
A new practical algorithm for volume estimation using annealing of convex bodiesA new practical algorithm for volume estimation using annealing of convex bodies
A new practical algorithm for volume estimation using annealing of convex bodies
 
Volume computation and applications
Volume computation and applications Volume computation and applications
Volume computation and applications
 
Geodesic algorithms: an experimental study
Geodesic algorithms: an experimental studyGeodesic algorithms: an experimental study
Geodesic algorithms: an experimental study
 
The Earth is not flat; but it's not round either (Geography on Boost.Geometry)
The Earth is not flat; but it's not round either (Geography on Boost.Geometry)The Earth is not flat; but it's not round either (Geography on Boost.Geometry)
The Earth is not flat; but it's not round either (Geography on Boost.Geometry)
 
Faster Geometric Algorithms via Dynamic Determinant Computation
Faster Geometric Algorithms via Dynamic Determinant ComputationFaster Geometric Algorithms via Dynamic Determinant Computation
Faster Geometric Algorithms via Dynamic Determinant Computation
 
An algorithm for computing resultant polytopes
An algorithm for computing resultant polytopesAn algorithm for computing resultant polytopes
An algorithm for computing resultant polytopes
 

Recently uploaded

(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
Scintica Instrumentation
 
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptxESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
muralinath2
 
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdfextra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
DiyaBiswas10
 
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also FunctionsMammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
YOGESH DOGRA
 
FAIR & AI Ready KGs for Explainable Predictions
FAIR & AI Ready KGs for Explainable PredictionsFAIR & AI Ready KGs for Explainable Predictions
FAIR & AI Ready KGs for Explainable Predictions
Michel Dumontier
 
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayCancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
AADYARAJPANDEY1
 
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Sérgio Sacani
 

Recently uploaded (20)

In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptxIn silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
 
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
 
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptxESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
 
insect morphology and physiology of insect
insect morphology and physiology of insectinsect morphology and physiology of insect
insect morphology and physiology of insect
 
FAIRSpectra - Towards a common data file format for SIMS images
FAIRSpectra - Towards a common data file format for SIMS imagesFAIRSpectra - Towards a common data file format for SIMS images
FAIRSpectra - Towards a common data file format for SIMS images
 
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlands
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard's aventures in two entangled wonderlands
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlands
 
SCHIZOPHRENIA Disorder/ Brain Disorder.pdf
SCHIZOPHRENIA Disorder/ Brain Disorder.pdfSCHIZOPHRENIA Disorder/ Brain Disorder.pdf
SCHIZOPHRENIA Disorder/ Brain Disorder.pdf
 
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdfextra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
 
Predicting property prices with machine learning algorithms.pdf
Predicting property prices with machine learning algorithms.pdfPredicting property prices with machine learning algorithms.pdf
Predicting property prices with machine learning algorithms.pdf
 
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocks
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocksStructures and textures of metamorphic rocks
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocks
 
INSIGHT Partner Profile: Tampere University
INSIGHT Partner Profile: Tampere UniversityINSIGHT Partner Profile: Tampere University
INSIGHT Partner Profile: Tampere University
 
EY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptx
EY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptxEY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptx
EY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptx
 
GLOBAL AND LOCAL SCENARIO OF FOOD AND NUTRITION.pptx
GLOBAL AND LOCAL SCENARIO OF FOOD AND NUTRITION.pptxGLOBAL AND LOCAL SCENARIO OF FOOD AND NUTRITION.pptx
GLOBAL AND LOCAL SCENARIO OF FOOD AND NUTRITION.pptx
 
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also FunctionsMammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
 
Large scale production of streptomycin.pptx
Large scale production of streptomycin.pptxLarge scale production of streptomycin.pptx
Large scale production of streptomycin.pptx
 
FAIR & AI Ready KGs for Explainable Predictions
FAIR & AI Ready KGs for Explainable PredictionsFAIR & AI Ready KGs for Explainable Predictions
FAIR & AI Ready KGs for Explainable Predictions
 
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayCancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
 
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
 
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...
 
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 5) Chemistry of Lipids
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 5) Chemistry of LipidsGBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 5) Chemistry of Lipids
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 5) Chemistry of Lipids
 

"Combinatorics of 4-dimensional resultant polytopes"

  • 1. Combinatorics of 4-dimensional Resultant Polytopes Vissarion Fisikopoulos Joint work with Alicia Dickenstein (U. Buenos Aires) & Ioannis Z. Emiris (UoA) Dept. of Informatics & Telecommunications, University of Athens ISSAC 2013
  • 2. Resultant polytopes Algebra: generalization of the resultant polynomial degree Geometry: Minkowski summands of secondary polytopes Applications: support computation → discriminant and resultant computation
  • 3. Polytopes and Algebra Given n + 1 polynomials on n variables. Supports (set of exponents of monomials with non-zero coefficient) A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn . The resultant R is the polynomial in the coefficients of a system of polynomials which vanishes if there exists a common root in the torus of the given polynomials. The resultant polytope N(R), is the convex hull of the support of R, i.e. the Newton polytope of the resultant. f0(x) = ax2 + b f1(x) = cx2 + dx + e
  • 4. Polytopes and Algebra Given n + 1 polynomials on n variables. Supports (set of exponents of monomials with non-zero coefficient) A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn . The resultant R is the polynomial in the coefficients of a system of polynomials which vanishes if there exists a common root in the torus of the given polynomials. The resultant polytope N(R), is the convex hull of the support of R, i.e. the Newton polytope of the resultant. A0 A1 f0(x) = ax2 + b f1(x) = cx2 + dx + e
  • 5. Polytopes and Algebra Given n + 1 polynomials on n variables. Supports (set of exponents of monomials with non-zero coefficient) A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn . The resultant R is the polynomial in the coefficients of a system of polynomials which vanishes if there exists a common root in the torus of the given polynomials. The resultant polytope N(R), is the convex hull of the support of R, i.e. the Newton polytope of the resultant. A0 A1 R(a, b, c, d, e) = ad2 b + c2 b2 − 2caeb + a2 e2 f0(x) = ax2 + b f1(x) = cx2 + dx + e
  • 6. Polytopes and Algebra Given n + 1 polynomials on n variables. Supports (set of exponents of monomials with non-zero coefficient) A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn . The resultant R is the polynomial in the coefficients of a system of polynomials which vanishes if there exists a common root in the torus of the given polynomials. The resultant polytope N(R), is the convex hull of the support of R, i.e. the Newton polytope of the resultant. A0 A1 N(R)R(a, b, c, d, e) = ad2 b + c2 b2 − 2caeb + a2 e2 f0(x) = ax2 + b f1(x) = cx2 + dx + e
  • 7. Polytopes and Algebra The case of linear polynomials A0 A1 N(R) A2 4-dimensional Birkhoff polytope f0(x, y) = ax + by + c f1(x, y) = dx + ey + f f2(x, y) = gx + hy + i a b c d e f g h i R(a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i) =
  • 8. Polytopes and Algebra A0 A1 Q: How N(R) looks like in the general case A2 f0(x, y) = axy2 + x4 y + c f1(x, y) = dx + ey f2(x, y) = gx2 + hy + i
  • 9. Resultant polytopes: Motivation Algebra: useful to express the solvability of polynomial systems, generalizes the notion of the degree of the resultant Geometry: Minkowski summands of secondary polytopes, equival. classes of secondary vertices, generalize Birkhoff polytopes Applications: support computation → discriminant and resultant computation, implicitization of parametric hypersurfaces
  • 10. Existing work [GKZ’90] Univariate case / general dimensional N(R) [Sturmfels’94] Multivariate case / up to 3 dimensional N(R)
  • 11. Existing work [GKZ’90] Univariate case / general dimensional N(R) [Sturmfels’94] Multivariate case / up to 3 dimensional N(R)
  • 12. One step beyond... 4-dimensional N(R) Polytope P ⊆ R4 ; f-vector is the vector of its face cardinalities. Call vertices, edges, ridges, facets, the 0,1,2,3-d, resp., faces of P. f-vectors of 4-dimensional N(R) (5, 10, 10, 5) (6, 15, 18, 9) (8, 20, 21, 9) (9, 22, 21, 8) . . . (17, 49, 48, 16) (17, 49, 49, 17) (17, 50, 50, 17) (18, 51, 48, 15) (18, 51, 49, 16) (18, 52, 50, 16) (18, 52, 51, 17) (18, 53, 51, 16) (18, 53, 53, 18) (18, 54, 54, 18) (19, 54, 52, 17) (19, 55, 51, 15) (19, 55, 52, 16) (19, 55, 54, 18) (19, 56, 54, 17) (19, 56, 56, 19) (19, 57, 57, 19) (20, 58, 54, 16) (20, 59, 57, 18) (20, 60, 60, 20) (21, 62, 60, 19) (21, 63, 63, 21) (22, 66, 66, 22)
  • 13. One step beyond... 4-dimensional N(R) Polytope P ⊆ R4 ; f-vector is the vector of its face cardinalities. Call vertices, edges, ridges, facets, the 0,1,2,3-d, resp., faces of P. f-vectors of 4-dimensional N(R) (5, 10, 10, 5) (6, 15, 18, 9) (8, 20, 21, 9) (9, 22, 21, 8) . . . (17, 49, 48, 16) (17, 49, 49, 17) (17, 50, 50, 17) (18, 51, 48, 15) (18, 51, 49, 16) (18, 52, 50, 16) (18, 52, 51, 17) (18, 53, 51, 16) (18, 53, 53, 18) (18, 54, 54, 18) (19, 54, 52, 17) (19, 55, 51, 15) (19, 55, 52, 16) (19, 55, 54, 18) (19, 56, 54, 17) (19, 56, 56, 19) (19, 57, 57, 19) (20, 58, 54, 16) (20, 59, 57, 18) (20, 60, 60, 20) (21, 62, 60, 19) (21, 63, 63, 21) (22, 66, 66, 22)
  • 14. One step beyond... 4-dimensional N(R) Polytope P ⊆ R4 ; f-vector is the vector of its face cardinalities. Call vertices, edges, ridges, facets, the 0,1,2,3-d, resp., faces of P. f-vectors of 4-dimensional N(R) (5, 10, 10, 5) (6, 15, 18, 9) (8, 20, 21, 9) (9, 22, 21, 8) . . . (17, 49, 48, 16) (17, 49, 49, 17) (17, 50, 50, 17) (18, 51, 48, 15) (18, 51, 49, 16) (18, 52, 50, 16) (18, 52, 51, 17) (18, 53, 51, 16) (18, 53, 53, 18) (18, 54, 54, 18) (19, 54, 52, 17) (19, 55, 51, 15) (19, 55, 52, 16) (19, 55, 54, 18) (19, 56, 54, 17) (19, 56, 56, 19) (19, 57, 57, 19) (20, 58, 54, 16) (20, 59, 57, 18) (20, 60, 60, 20) (21, 62, 60, 19) (21, 63, 63, 21) (22, 66, 66, 22)
  • 15. Computation of resultant polytopes respol software [Emiris-F-Konaxis-Pe˜naranda ’12] lower bounds C++, CGAL (Computational Geometry Algorithms Library) http://sourceforge.net/projects/respol Alternative algorithm that utilizes tropical geometry (GFan library) [Jensen-Yu ’11]
  • 16. Computation of resultant polytopes respol software [Emiris-F-Konaxis-Pe˜naranda ’12] lower bounds C++, CGAL (Computational Geometry Algorithms Library) http://sourceforge.net/projects/respol Alternative algorithm that utilizes tropical geometry (GFan library) [Jensen-Yu ’11]
  • 17. Main result Theorem Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are degenerations of the polytopes in following cases. (i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5). (ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector (10, 26, 25, 9). (iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28, and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight. Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces. Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3. Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
  • 18. Main result Theorem Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are degenerations of the polytopes in following cases. (i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5). (ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector (10, 26, 25, 9). (iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28, and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight. Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces. Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3. Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
  • 19. Main result Theorem Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are degenerations of the polytopes in following cases. (i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5). (ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector (10, 26, 25, 9). (iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28, and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight. Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces. Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3. Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
  • 20. Main result Theorem Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are degenerations of the polytopes in following cases. (i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5). (ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector (10, 26, 25, 9). (iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28, and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight. Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces. Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3. Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
  • 21. Main result Theorem Given A0, A1, . . . , An ⊂ Zn with N(R) of dimension 4. Then N(R) are degenerations of the polytopes in following cases. (i) All |Ai| = 2, except for one with cardinality 5, is a 4-simplex with f-vector (5, 10, 10, 5). (ii) All |Ai| = 2, except for two with cardinalities 3 and 4, has f-vector (10, 26, 25, 9). (iii) All |Ai| = 2, except for three with cardinality 3, maximal number of ridges is ˜f2 = 66 and of facets ˜f3 = 22. Moreover, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28, and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight. Degenarations can only decrease the number of faces. Focus on new case (iii), which reduces to n = 2 and each |Ai| = 3. Previous upper bound for vertices yields 6608 [Sturmfels’94].
  • 22. Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions A subdivision S of A0 + A1 + · · · + An is mixed when its cells have expressions as Minkowski sums of convex hulls of point subsets in Ai’s. Example mixed subdivision S of A0 + A1 + A2 A0 A1 A2 Proposition (Sturmfels’94) A regular mixed subdivision S of A0 + A1 + · · · + An corresponds to a face of N(R) which is the Minkowski sum of the resultant polytopes of the cells (subsystems) of S.
  • 23. Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions A subdivision S of A0 + A1 + · · · + An is mixed when its cells have expressions as Minkowski sums of convex hulls of point subsets in Ai’s. Example mixed subdivision S of A0 + A1 + A2 A0 A1 A2 Proposition (Sturmfels’94) A regular mixed subdivision S of A0 + A1 + · · · + An corresponds to a face of N(R) which is the Minkowski sum of the resultant polytopes of the cells (subsystems) of S.
  • 24. Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions Example white, blue, red cells → N(R) vertex purple cell → N(R) segment turquoise cell → N(R) triangle Mink. sum of N(R) triangle and N(R) segmentsubd. S of A0 + A1 + A2
  • 25. Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions Example white, blue, red cells → N(R) vertex purple cell → N(R) segment turquoise cell → N(R) triangle Mink. sum of N(R) triangle and N(R) segmentsubd. S of A0 + A1 + A2
  • 26. Tool (1): N(R) faces and subdivisions Example white, blue, red cells → N(R) vertex purple cell → N(R) segment turquoise cell → N(R) triangle Mink. sum of N(R) triangle and N(R) segmentsubd. S of A0 + A1 + A2
  • 27. Tool (2): Input genericity Proposition Input genericity maximizes the number of resultant polytope faces. Proof idea N(R∗ ) f-vector: (18, 52, 50, 16) N(R) f-vector: (14, 38, 36, 12) p p∗ A0 A1 A2 A0 A1 A2
  • 28. Tool (2): Input genericity Proposition Input genericity maximizes the number of resultant polytope faces. Proof idea N(R∗ ) f-vector: (18, 52, 50, 16) N(R) f-vector: (14, 38, 36, 12) p p∗ A0 A1 A2 A0 A1 A2 → For upper bounds on the number of N(R) faces consider generic inputs, i.e. no parallel edges.
  • 29. Facets of 4-d resultant polytopes Lemma All the possible types of N(R) facets are resultant facet: 3-d N(R) prism facet: 2-d N(R) (triangle) + 1-d N(R) cube facet: 1-d N(R) + 1-d N(R) + 1-d N(R) 3D
  • 30. Facets of 4-d resultant polytopes Lemma All the possible types of N(R) facets are resultant facet: 3-d N(R) prism facet: 2-d N(R) (triangle) + 1-d N(R) cube facet: 1-d N(R) + 1-d N(R) + 1-d N(R) 3D 2D
  • 31. Counting facets Lemma There can be at most 9, 9, 4 resultant, prism, cube facets, resp., and this is tight. Proof idea Unique subdivision that corresponds to 4 cube facets
  • 32. Faces of 4-d resultant polytopes Lemma The maximal number of ridges of N(R) is ˜f2 = 66. Moreover, ˜f1 = ˜f0 + 44, 22 ≤ ˜f0 ≤ 28, and 66 ≤ ˜f1 ≤ 72. The lower bounds are tight. Elements of proof [Kalai87] f1 + i≥4 (i − 3)fi 2 ≥ df0 − d + 1 2 , where fi 2 is the number of 2-faces which are i-gons.
  • 33. Open problems & a conjecture Open The maximum f-vector of a 4d-resultant polytope is (22, 66, 66, 22). Open Explain symmetry of f-vectors of 4d-resultant polytopes. Conjecture f0(d) ≤ 3 · S =d−1 i∈S ˜f0(i) where S is any multiset with elements in {1, . . . , d − 1}, S := i∈S i, and ˜f0(i) is the maximum number of vertices of a i-dimensional N(R). The only bound in terms of d is (3d − 3)2d2 [Sturmfels’94], yielding ˜f0(5) ≤ 1250 whereas our conjecture yields ˜f0(5) ≤ 231.
  • 34. Open problems & a conjecture Open The maximum f-vector of a 4d-resultant polytope is (22, 66, 66, 22). Open Explain symmetry of f-vectors of 4d-resultant polytopes. Conjecture f0(d) ≤ 3 · S =d−1 i∈S ˜f0(i) where S is any multiset with elements in {1, . . . , d − 1}, S := i∈S i, and ˜f0(i) is the maximum number of vertices of a i-dimensional N(R). The only bound in terms of d is (3d − 3)2d2 [Sturmfels’94], yielding ˜f0(5) ≤ 1250 whereas our conjecture yields ˜f0(5) ≤ 231.
  • 35. Open problems & a conjecture Open The maximum f-vector of a 4d-resultant polytope is (22, 66, 66, 22). Open Explain symmetry of f-vectors of 4d-resultant polytopes. Conjecture f0(d) ≤ 3 · S =d−1 i∈S ˜f0(i) where S is any multiset with elements in {1, . . . , d − 1}, S := i∈S i, and ˜f0(i) is the maximum number of vertices of a i-dimensional N(R). The only bound in terms of d is (3d − 3)2d2 [Sturmfels’94], yielding ˜f0(5) ≤ 1250 whereas our conjecture yields ˜f0(5) ≤ 231.
  • 36. Open problems & a conjecture Open The maximum f-vector of a 4d-resultant polytope is (22, 66, 66, 22). Open Explain symmetry of f-vectors of 4d-resultant polytopes. Conjecture f0(d) ≤ 3 · S =d−1 i∈S ˜f0(i) where S is any multiset with elements in {1, . . . , d − 1}, S := i∈S i, and ˜f0(i) is the maximum number of vertices of a i-dimensional N(R). The only bound in terms of d is (3d − 3)2d2 [Sturmfels’94], yielding ˜f0(5) ≤ 1250 whereas our conjecture yields ˜f0(5) ≤ 231.
  • 37.