CEM Workshop Lectures (4/11): CEM of High Frequency Methods

1Built-to-Spec | Product Approval | Engineering Services | Software Development
CEM of High Frequency
Methods
Various methods to solve high frequency
electromagnetics

2
©ZeusNumerixPvtLtd:ConfidentialDocument
Overview
28-Sep-2012 Best Practices in CEM
 Introduction
 Comparison of Physical Optics with Geometric Optics
 Physical optics formulation (PO)
 Shadowing effects for PO
 Equivalent edge currents formulation (PTD)
 Shooting And Bouncing Ray methodology (SBR)
 Surface currents for PO, flash point analysis
 Conclusion
2

3
Introduction
 When a perfectly conducting body is illuminated by an electromagnetic field, electric
currents are induced on the surface of the body.
 These currents act as new sources and create an electromagnetic field radiated
outward from the body.
 This field, called the scattered field, depends on the frequency and the polarization
of the incident field.
 Radar Cross Section (RCS), which is the fictitious area of the target, characterizes the
spatial distribution of the power of the scattered field.
 Among high frequency scattering techniques, Physical Optics (PO) and Geometric
Optics (GO) are the most popular methods.
3

4
Comparison of GO and PO
 GO is based on the classical ray-tracing of incident, reflected and transmitted rays
while PO is based on the integration of induced currents predicted by GO.
 According to GO, RCS is given by a simple formula that involves the local radius of
curvature at the specular point. Prediction fails when radius of curvature becomes
infinite.
 The PO surface integral approach gives the correct result around the specular
direction.
4

5
Theoretical Background (PO)
 PO uses the following steps in order to find the scattered field:
 The incident and reflected fields on the surface of the scatterer is found by
Geometrical Optics.
 The current excited on the surface of the scatterer is found by the tangential
components of the incident fields on the surface.
 The PO current for a conducting body is given by:
 Illuminated region:
 Shadowed region:
 Using radiation integrals, PO surface current is integrated over the surface of the
scatterer, to yield the scattered field
5
𝐽𝑆 = 0
𝐽𝑆 = 0

6
 The total PO field is given by the superposition of the incident and the scattered
fields:
 The incident electric and magnetic fields are given by the following expressions:
 Relation between incident magnetic and electric field:
6
𝐻 𝑖
= ( 𝐸 𝜑
𝑖
𝜃 𝑖
− 𝐸 𝜃
𝑖
𝜑 𝑖
)(𝑒−𝑗𝑘 𝑟 𝑖. 𝑟
/𝜂)

7
 Vector potential for scattered field:
 Scattered field is evaluated using the current computed with Physical optics:
7
𝐴 𝑠 = (𝑒−𝑗𝑘𝑟𝑠 𝜇/4𝜋𝑟𝑠)
𝑆
𝐽𝑒 𝑗𝑘 𝑟𝑠. 𝑟 𝑑𝑠
𝐸 𝑠
= −(𝑗𝑤𝜇/2𝜋𝑟𝑠)𝑒−𝑗𝑘𝑟𝑠
𝑆
𝑛 × 𝐻 𝑖
𝑒 𝑗𝑘 𝑟𝑠. 𝑟
𝑑𝑆

8
Shadowing Effects for PO
 When an electromagnetic wave is incident on a body, part of its surface is
illuminated and the rest is dark, depending on the direction of propagation with
respect to the body.
 Additionally, some parts of the body may be shadowed by other parts.
 In the PO solution, the contributions from these shadowed regions should be
discarded from the RCS calculations
8

9
Shadowing Effects (Methodology)
 Considering surface triangulation meshing, each triangle is taken and checked if it is
shadowed by other triangles or not.
 More than one triangle may be in shadow because of a single triangle, depending on
the shape of the scatterer.
 Induced currents and hence the scattered field from shadowed triangles are not
considered.
 A very popular algorithm is the ‘Ray intersection’ algorithm for shadowing
implementation.
9

10
Equivalent Edge Currents (PTD)
 When a body is illuminated by a plane wave, current is induced around the edges of
the body due to the diffraction of the incident field
 It involves finding currents that would, when integrated along the edge, give a known
value of radiated field at the observation point
 PTD approximates the edge contribution by subtracting the incident field and the PO
field from the exact solution for the total field
 The non-uniform part of induced current is called the fringe current and caused by
the presence of the edges
 Hence, the fields of fringe currents can be assumed to be caused by the equivalent
edge currents located along the edge
 This procedure of improving PO fields by the fringe fields of equivalent edge currents
is called PTD
10

11
Scattering (PO + Fringe Wave Effect)
 Scattering from flat plates is considered.
 Scattering contributions are from the surface of the plate (PO) and the edges of the
plate (fringe wave effect).
11

12
Formulation for PTD
 The current induced over the surface of the scatterer can be decomposed into PO
and non-uniform(fringe) component.
 Accordingly, the total scattered field is composed of two components: the Physical
Optics(PO) field and the fringe wave(FW) field.
 The exact solution of the total field is the sum of the PO contribution and the fringe
wave contribution.
12
𝐽 𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 𝐽 𝑃𝑂 + 𝐽 𝐹𝑊
𝐸 𝑠
= 𝐸 𝑃𝑂 + 𝐸 𝐹𝑊

13
Expression for Edge Contribution
 For the fringe wave contribution, scattering integral is evaluated over the near-edge
points.
 The contribution from the rest of the surface is negligible as it is accounted for in the
PO computation.
 For any far-field observation point, the total scattered field due to the induced
current on a surface S is given by
13
  
Sedge
jkRFWPO
s
s
RsdeJRRjEE  4/))(ˆˆ(ˆ

14
Shooting and Bouncing Ray (SBR)
 Combining Geometric Optics and Physical Optics methods, SBR begins the
computation by launching numerous rays from the source.
 Each ray then propagates through the computational domain and bounces between
the target surfaces under study using the GO method.
 The electromagnetic fields at each hit point are converted into surface currents using
the PO methods and re-radiated towards all observation points.
 Finally, the fields at each observation point are summed up to represent the final
electromagnetic field computed at the corresponding location of the computational
domain.
14

15
SBR Implementation (Bounding Box Method)
 An advanced method is the bounding box method, which first encloses the target
structure in a volume.
 Then, rays are generated at equal spacing on the volume and launched towards the
volume.
 This is a dynamic way of generating the rays, as it guarantees that all of the
generated rays will be able to be incident at the structure.
15

16
Hotspot Visualization (PO Application)
 Surface current distribution on the scatterer surface:
 Helps to identify regions that contribute more to RCS for a given source position.
 Has wide applications in designing low RCS objects, flash point analysis etc.
16

17
Flash Point Analysis
 According to the high frequency phenomena, only some parts of the scatterer
contribute to the scattered field.
 Using the flash point visualization, localized reflected and diffracted currents are
extracted.
 Although PO technique is fast, RCS calculations for very large objects, may take long
period of time.
 Localizing the contributions of the surface current and calculating the PO integral
around these regions may shorten the calculation period.
17

18
Conclusions
 PO is one of the high frequency techniques, and PTD is a correction term that is
added.
 GO traces all of the incident and reflected rays, whereas PO only calculates the
simple surface integral.
 PO for targets that have impedance surfaces yields RCS results that are lower than
the results of perfectly conducting surfaces.
 Hot spot visualization, an application of PO computation, is used for designing
objects to produce low RCS.
18

19
www.zeusnumerix.com
+91 72760 31511
Abhishek Jain
abhishek@zeusnumerix.com
Thank You !

CEM Workshop Lectures (4/11): CEM of High Frequency Methods

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to CEM Workshop Lectures (4/11): CEM of High Frequency Methods

Similar to CEM Workshop Lectures (4/11): CEM of High Frequency Methods (20)

More from Abhishek Jain

More from Abhishek Jain (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

CEM Workshop Lectures (4/11): CEM of High Frequency Methods