This document discusses education inequality in China by providing an overview of the country's education system and challenges. It notes that while Shanghai achieved the highest PISA scores, large inequalities exist between urban and rural areas. The exam-oriented system and hukou system consolidate these disparities. Current policies aim to increase infrastructure and teachers in rural schools, but recommendations include boosting education budgets, forming school partnerships, reforming exams, and adopting a unified curriculum through digital technologies. The case study examines factors contributing to inequality and ways to promote more equitable, well-rounded education across China.
This presentation was an assignment for a subject "Comparative Education". This presentation explains the existing education system in China. It talks about all levels from Pre School to Adult & life long learning in China. Teacher education in China is also discussed here, along with the Planning & Management authorities regarding the financial management of the Chinese Education System.
Let me know in the comments if you want me to upload a video of myself presenting this presentation.
Education in China is a state-run system of public education run by the Ministry of Education. All citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which the government funds. It includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (middle school) for ages 12 to 15. Some provinces may have five years of primary school but four years for middle school. After middle school, there are three years of high school, which then completes the secondary education. The Ministry of Education reported a 99 percent attendance rate for primary school and an 80 percent rate for both primary and middle schools.[citation needed] In 1985, the government abolished tax-funded higher education, requiring university applicants to compete for scholarships based on academic ability. In the early 1980s the government allowed the establishment of the first private school, increasing the number of undergraduates and people who hold doctoral degrees fivefold from 1995 to 2005.[4] In 2003 China supported 1,552 institutions of higher learning (colleges and universities) and their 725,000 professors and 11 million students (see List of universities in China). There are over 100 National Key Universities, including Peking University and Tsinghua University. Chinese spending has grown by 20% per year since 1999, now reaching over $100bn, and as many as 1.5 million science and engineering students graduated from Chinese universities in 2006. China published 184,080 papers as of 2008.[5] China has also become a top destination for international students.[6] As of 2013, China is the most popular country in Asia for international students, and ranks third overall among countries.[6]
Laws regulating the system of education include the Regulation on Academic Degrees, the Compulsory Education Law, the Teachers Law, the Education Law, the Law on Vocational Education, and the Law on Higher Education. See also: Law of the People's Republic of China.
Although Shanghai and Hong Kong are among the top performers in the Programme for International Student Assessment, China's educational system has been criticized for its rigorousness, as well as its emphasis on rote memorization and test preparation.
This presentation was an assignment for a subject "Comparative Education". This presentation explains the existing education system in China. It talks about all levels from Pre School to Adult & life long learning in China. Teacher education in China is also discussed here, along with the Planning & Management authorities regarding the financial management of the Chinese Education System.
Let me know in the comments if you want me to upload a video of myself presenting this presentation.
Education in China is a state-run system of public education run by the Ministry of Education. All citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which the government funds. It includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (middle school) for ages 12 to 15. Some provinces may have five years of primary school but four years for middle school. After middle school, there are three years of high school, which then completes the secondary education. The Ministry of Education reported a 99 percent attendance rate for primary school and an 80 percent rate for both primary and middle schools.[citation needed] In 1985, the government abolished tax-funded higher education, requiring university applicants to compete for scholarships based on academic ability. In the early 1980s the government allowed the establishment of the first private school, increasing the number of undergraduates and people who hold doctoral degrees fivefold from 1995 to 2005.[4] In 2003 China supported 1,552 institutions of higher learning (colleges and universities) and their 725,000 professors and 11 million students (see List of universities in China). There are over 100 National Key Universities, including Peking University and Tsinghua University. Chinese spending has grown by 20% per year since 1999, now reaching over $100bn, and as many as 1.5 million science and engineering students graduated from Chinese universities in 2006. China published 184,080 papers as of 2008.[5] China has also become a top destination for international students.[6] As of 2013, China is the most popular country in Asia for international students, and ranks third overall among countries.[6]
Laws regulating the system of education include the Regulation on Academic Degrees, the Compulsory Education Law, the Teachers Law, the Education Law, the Law on Vocational Education, and the Law on Higher Education. See also: Law of the People's Republic of China.
Although Shanghai and Hong Kong are among the top performers in the Programme for International Student Assessment, China's educational system has been criticized for its rigorousness, as well as its emphasis on rote memorization and test preparation.
In 2015, three economies in China participated in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, or PISA, for the first time: Beijing, a municipality, Jiangsu, a province on the eastern coast of the country, and Guangdong, a southern coastal province. Shanghai, which, like Beijing, is also a Chinese megacity of over 20 million people, has participated in PISA since 2009. These four economies alone are home to more than 233 million people – more than the entire population of Brazil, nearly three times the population of Germany and nearly four times the population of France. What do we know about the largest education system in the world? A system that is educating 260 million young people, and that employs 15 million teachers? Not very much. This paper aims to change that. It provides a broad overview of how China’s education system is organised and operates, and how reforms, both past and current, have reshaped education in China over time. The report then examines in greater detail education in the four economies within China that participated in PISA 2015. It provides the context in which China’s participation in PISA – and its results in PISA – should be interpreted.
http://www.oecd.org/china/Education-in-China-a-snapshot.pdf
This is the presentation I tried to use for my paper presentation during my semester 5 intra department fest. In this I have highlighted on NEW EDUCATION POLICY 2020.
Public education is universally required at the K–12 level, and is available at state colleges and universities for all students. K–12 public school curricula, budgets, and policies are set through locally elected school boards, who have jurisdiction over individual school districts. State governments set overall educational standards, often mandate standardized tests for K–12 public school systems, and supervise, usually through a board of regents, state colleges and universities. Funding comes from the state, local, and federal government.[4]
Private schools are generally free to determine their own curriculum and staffing policies, with voluntary accreditation available through independent regional accreditation authorities. About 87% of school-age children attend public schools, about 10% attend private schools,[5] and roughly 3% are home-schooled.
Japan's educational system is clever that indeed made them placed fourth in the international science and math study in 2007,and many other achievements wherein they are competing globally.
Amidst these achievements in the said major subjects, Japan also gives emphasis and importance to what they really own; their language as part of their curriculum.
Above all of these, agencies both in public and private sectors made a big part in which they provided the needs and necessities in education.
By this, its quite obvious that Japan will continue reigning in the international education studies and also continue aiming the reality of their vision; to produce a globally-competitive individuals.
A Closer Look to the Educational Sytems of the Worldghostfreak09
A report presented by different individuals from the school of Eastern Samar State University-Guiuan. I hope that students can use it in their studies to.
In the 2016/17 academic year, South Korea once again found itself as the third largest feeder country to the U.S. In this webinar, we offer an overview of the education system in South Korea and provide you with the tools necessary to evaluate credentials from this established market.
In 2015, three economies in China participated in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, or PISA, for the first time: Beijing, a municipality, Jiangsu, a province on the eastern coast of the country, and Guangdong, a southern coastal province. Shanghai, which, like Beijing, is also a Chinese megacity of over 20 million people, has participated in PISA since 2009. These four economies alone are home to more than 233 million people – more than the entire population of Brazil, nearly three times the population of Germany and nearly four times the population of France. What do we know about the largest education system in the world? A system that is educating 260 million young people, and that employs 15 million teachers? Not very much. This paper aims to change that. It provides a broad overview of how China’s education system is organised and operates, and how reforms, both past and current, have reshaped education in China over time. The report then examines in greater detail education in the four economies within China that participated in PISA 2015. It provides the context in which China’s participation in PISA – and its results in PISA – should be interpreted.
http://www.oecd.org/china/Education-in-China-a-snapshot.pdf
This is the presentation I tried to use for my paper presentation during my semester 5 intra department fest. In this I have highlighted on NEW EDUCATION POLICY 2020.
Public education is universally required at the K–12 level, and is available at state colleges and universities for all students. K–12 public school curricula, budgets, and policies are set through locally elected school boards, who have jurisdiction over individual school districts. State governments set overall educational standards, often mandate standardized tests for K–12 public school systems, and supervise, usually through a board of regents, state colleges and universities. Funding comes from the state, local, and federal government.[4]
Private schools are generally free to determine their own curriculum and staffing policies, with voluntary accreditation available through independent regional accreditation authorities. About 87% of school-age children attend public schools, about 10% attend private schools,[5] and roughly 3% are home-schooled.
Japan's educational system is clever that indeed made them placed fourth in the international science and math study in 2007,and many other achievements wherein they are competing globally.
Amidst these achievements in the said major subjects, Japan also gives emphasis and importance to what they really own; their language as part of their curriculum.
Above all of these, agencies both in public and private sectors made a big part in which they provided the needs and necessities in education.
By this, its quite obvious that Japan will continue reigning in the international education studies and also continue aiming the reality of their vision; to produce a globally-competitive individuals.
A Closer Look to the Educational Sytems of the Worldghostfreak09
A report presented by different individuals from the school of Eastern Samar State University-Guiuan. I hope that students can use it in their studies to.
In the 2016/17 academic year, South Korea once again found itself as the third largest feeder country to the U.S. In this webinar, we offer an overview of the education system in South Korea and provide you with the tools necessary to evaluate credentials from this established market.
Indonesian Higher Education by Fadlil Munawar Manshur. Source: https://www.eastwestcenter.org/fileadmin/resources/education/ed2020_docs/Indonesia_01.ppt
Open Distance Education in China: Trends and Developments by Haixia Xu (Chine...EduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Haixia Xu of the National Center for Education Development Research - Chinese Ministry of Education at the international seminar “Opening higher education: what the future might bring” 8-9 december 2016, in Berlin, Germany, jointly organised by OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI) and Laureate International Universities (LIU).
B pont int perspective on ed change bc boisi oct 2015Beatriz Pont
What are OECD countries education change and reform strategies? Are policy makers high expectations: matched with policy capacity to reach the classrooms? There is a need to have clear vision, focus on implementation and evaluation of reforms.
20 annual boisi lecture, Lynch School of Education, Boston College,October, 2015
http://frontrow.bc.edu/program/pont/
Moving up into upper secondary by Hannah Kitchen - OECD Education Webinar 23N...EduSkills OECD
Hannah Kitchen, Project Leader of Above and Beyond: Transitions in Upper Secondary Project at the OECD presents at the webinar Moving up into upper secondary on the 23 November 2023
Experiencing tough history and indigence after war, investing in and training human resources became a
priority task for the government. Education has thus been key in the reconstruction and growth of the
country. While Korea quickly attained high level of enrollment and performance, this success didn’t come
without drawbacks. The intense competition in education gradually led to seriously jeopardize student’s well-being. In this context, this presentation will assess and diagnose the strength and weakness of the Korean education system and provide recommendations focusing on the following question: How can Korea combine outstanding academic performance with students’ well-being?
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
2. Outline
I. Context and Issues
A. Country Overview
B. Main Challenges: inequality + exam-oriented
I. Current Policies and Policy Recommendations
3. I.Context and Issues
1. Country Overview
Education sector of China has been gradually increasing
year by year.
Gross enrolment ratio
Secondary education: increased to over 95% in
2013 in whole China
Tertiary education is over 30%, increasing 60%
over the course of 10 years from 2004 to
2014.
45 million students in total of secondary and primary
school.
Source: UNESCO
4. I.Context and Issues
2. Education system of China
Students can choose whether to continue upper
secondary school after 9 years compulsory
education of primary school and lower
secondary school.
Upper secondary school is divided into general
school and vocational one.
In order to enter upper secondary school and
tertiary education, entrance examination has
to be taken.
Students experience too frequent
examinations and need high grades to
enroll higher education (Exam-oriented
System
5. I.Context and Issues
3. Paradox of Achievement in PISA
Shanghai achieved the highest score in PISA
2012.
But it never reflects the situation of China as a
whole.
The situation of rural area is far behind. There is
large inequality between rural/ urban.
This presentation shows what the inequality of
education is like and how to solve it
Results of PISA 2012
Source: OECD
6. I.Context and Issues - Challenges
1. Inequality across regions
1. Too exam-oriented
7. How to study the regions?
UNDP’s Human Development Index (HDI) as a way to classify the provincial
administrative regions (except Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR and Taiwan):
Tier 1: HDI > 0.75: Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin
Tier 2: 0.70 < HDI > 0.75: Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Liaoning, Guangdong, Inner
Mongolia, Shandong, Jilin, Fujian, Heilongjiang
Tier 3: 0.65 < HDI < 0.70: Hubei, Shaanxi, Shanxi, Hebei, Chongqing, Hunan,
Hainan, Henan, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Sichuan, Jiangxi, Anhui, Guangxi
Tier 4: HDI < 0.65: Qinghai, Gansu, Yunnan, Guizhou, Tibet
8.
9. Inequality between urban and rural areas:
A comparison between Beijing and Qinghai - in terms of education attainment
Source: State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook 2015
10. When we also take gender into account:
Source: State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook 2015
11. Inequality between urban and rural areas:
In terms of student-teacher ratio
Source: State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook 2015
12. Inequality between urban and rural areas:
A Comparison of Budgetary Government Appropriated Funds for Education per School Student
13. Inequality across different regions:
access to key universities
Easy mode:
Beijing, Tianjin,
Shanghai
“Hell mode”:
Tibet, Sichuan
Source: EDU Sina
14. Detrimental Effects of Hukou System on Education
Hukou system consolidates inequality
Children with rural Hukou have to go the school that is
in the area where they are registered, even if their
parents move to urban area to work
If children want to change their Hukou to the urban
Hukou, there is a highly competitive selection
But otherwise children living urban area with rural
Hukou cannot attain enough education
Source: Wu, X. 2011. The Household Registration System and
Rural-Urban Educational Inequality in Contemporary China.
16. Core Reason: the highly-competitive selection mechanism
of university entrance
Why is it so important? Because it is the key to social mobility!
How fierce is the competition?
“Top 2”: Peking University & Tsinghua University
In 2009, when Fangzhou entered PKU:
National PKU admission rate: 0.0263% (2,761 from 10,500,000)
Henan (most populated province) PKU admission rate: 0.0102%
Henan admission rate to key universities in 2009: 3.52% (33,766 from
959,000)
17. How does senior high school life look like?
6:30: Get up (Bugle Call)
7:05: Latest time to leave the dorm
7:20-7:40: Morning Reading (Chinese/English)
7.40-9:10: Class 1, 2
9:10-9:40: Morning Exercises/Taichi/Break
9:40-12:00: Class 3,4,5
12:00-14:00: Lunch Break
14:00-16:20: Class 6,7,8
16:30-17:30: Self Study/Sports Time
17:30-19:00: Dinner Break
19:00-20:45: Evening Self Study 1,2
22:30: Lights-out (1st and 2nd year student)
22:00-23:00: Evening Self Study (3rd year students)
23:30: Lights-out
18. Problems
Pressure: 500 primary and middle school students commit suicide per year
“High scores, low ability”: The story of Zhang Konggu
2003, admitted to PKU
→ 2004, ordered to quit due to internet addiction and failure in all his
compulsory classes
→2005, admitted to THU with highest score in his area
→2006, ordered to quit for the same reason
19. When inequality meets exam-oriented system:
High School Affiliated to Renmin
University of China, Beijing
200 elective courses
Foreign language courses in 10
languages other than English
More than 60 extracurricular
activities every year
Students have alternatives
other than Gao Kao, e.g.
study abroad
Hengshui High School: military-
like “super high school”
--86% of the total spots that PKU
and THU have in the whole
province of Hebei
BUT…
5:40 Get Up
No long hair allowed for girls
No snacks allowed other than a
few listed
Collective jogging time
VS
20. CURRENT POLICIES
● Infrastructure building : The Rural Primary and Secondary Schools
Dilapidated Building Renovation Project in Central and Western China, the
Rural Primary and Secondary Boarding Schools Project, and Comprehensive
Improvement of the Basic School Conditions for Schools at Poor and
Underdeveloped Areas.
● Attracting more teachers : Special Teaching Post Plan for Rural Schools and
the Free Pre-Service Teacher Education Program
● Universal quality teaching : Beijing Digital School (2012)
● Curriculum Change : Curriculum Reform Outline (2001)
22. 1. Increase Budget in rural areas
Source: China’s Education
System, OECD 2015
23. 2. Partnerships among schools and universities
Creation of partnerships between urban and rural primary and
secondary schools, following the Shanghai model
The common fund should be allocated to build partnerships
Exchange between top performers and low performers
4 actors: 2 schools, government officials and external body
Partnerships between rural and urban universities to relieve the
pressure for students
24. 3. Change the Exam-Oriented System
Reform the Gaokao system
25. 3. Change the Exam-Oriented System
Reform the Gaokao system
Gap Year/Semester
Well-rounded university selection process
Policy Implication: Strong leadership and efficient
communication
26. 4. Unified Curriculum through the use of ICT
Challenge: Unified VS Customized curriculum?
Strengthen digital platform “Beijing Digital School” (e-library, MOOCs,
chat options, etc.)
Communication on new resources
Financial and Technical Investments
Policy implications:
Internet access
ICT capacity-building for teachers
@Toyo = education has been improving or educational sector has been increasing? Info supports larger proportion, not quality
Take out “students experience too frequent examinations” and just mention it during class presentation → or else too many info getting lost→(Toyo) Yes I will try to focus on saying like “too frequent examination is highly stressful for students. But without obtaining good result, they could not enrol good university. We will talk about exam-oriented education in relation with inequality later.”
In provinces that are less developed like Qinghai, the gender effect on education attainment can be more devastating.
Parameter: Senior Secondary School
Note that bc of favorable Gao Kao policies towards ethnic minorities, things are not so bad for provinces like Ningxia or Qinghai. But generally speaking, it is still very unequal
Why: bc key universities are so unevenly distributed, and they all have favorable admission for locals.
For Chinese students, the aim of learning focuses solely on passing exams. The competition starts as early as primary school. Test scores of Chu Kao (lower secondary school entrance examination), Zhong Kao (senior high school entrance examination) and Gao Kao completely decide a student’s future, together with the easier Hui Kao (Graduation Certification Examination, similar to France’s baccalauréat or Germany’s Abitur).
The core reason for such a system lies in the selection mechanism of university entrance.
The university entrance is so important, because it is a key to social mobility: it is the easiest and most common way to change one’s Hukou status, from rural areas or small cities to big cities, and would therefore shape the lives of the students themselves as well as their families.
For most of the Chinese students, grades are the only evaluation standard, and the competition is very fierce. In year 2009, the year in which our group member Fangzhou entered Peking University, one of the top 2 universities in China, the national admission rate of PKU is only 0.0263% (2761 candidates selected against a pool of 10,500,000 participants in Gao Kao). In Henan Province, the most populated province in China, such a rate is as low as 0.0102%, and the admission rate for key universities in Henan that year is only 3.52% (33,766 candidates selected against 959,000 participants).
Teachers teach about test content every day, to make sure that students know how to solve problems in exams; students have to deal with tons of homework as well. A normal school day for a senior high school student is usually 14 hours, including 2-3 hours of self study time dedicated to homework. It is also common for schools to hold extra classes for students on Saturday, especially when Gao Kao is approaching. On average, each class has 3 or 4 tests per subject, allowing for few, if any, extracurricular activities or hobbies on account of the high volume of daily homework assignments. When Fangzhou prepared for Hui Kao in her second year of high school, for a whole semester, every Saturday was dedicated to exams on Physics, Chemistry and Biology, one after one from 7:30AM to 12:30PM.
The exam-oriented system has resulted in many problems. Such a system mixed with the family’s expectations for their children to succeed creates a climate of tremendous pressure for Chinese students. Although it is difficult to accurately compile suicide statistics for preliminary and middle school students in China, in 2014, National Health and Family Planning Commission of China announced that about 500 primary and middle school students commit suicide each year under academic pressure brought about by the examination-based education system.
The system also leads to the so-called “high scores, low ability” symptom among students. The story of Zhang Konggu is an extreme case: in 2003, he was admitted to Peking University, but had to quit one year later because of addiction to internet and failure in all his 7 compulsory classes. Then in 2005, he was admitted to Tsinghua University, the other university of the “top 2”, with highest score in Gao Kao in his area, and because of the same reason - getting addicted to internet, he had to quit again after one year. The student was reported to have a very childish character, and could not manage anything other than taking exams. His story reflects how the exam-oriented system actually hinders students’ all-round development.
Inequality across regions and exam-oriented education system in China together results in very extreme contrast. In privileged schools, in privileged region, e.g. the High School Affiliated to Renmin University of China, students are granted with more resources and the opportunity to develop themselves comprehensively: 200 elective courses available, foreign language courses in 10 languages other than English offered, more than 60 extracurricular activities every year; whereas students in less-privileged areas have to learn as machines for Gao Kao in so-called military-like “super high school”, e.g. Hengshui High School-The school had 96 students admitted by the “top 2” universities in China, namely PKU and THU, occupying 86% of the total spots that the 2 universities had in the whole Hebei Province; but students’ life is not colourful at all, or even miserable: no long hair for girls allowed, no snacks allowed other than a few listed, collective jogging time...The “super high schools” may well produce successful stories for Gao Kao, but such a phenomenon is not beneficial at all for education, security, or humanity.
@Manon - maybe too much info- we could alternatively just leave things in bold and present 1-4
@Manon - put other policy recommendations up
@Manon = too much info/not easily readable - highly suggest to take off at least one/potentially both graphs and just put up some facts on number increase
flexibility to study subjects of interest
to have exams more spread (not all at the end and to take exams multiple times)
to enter university with selected major - not according to quota and then select major
- 38 year old college entrance exam
- In 2015, pilote experiences to change Gaokao system in Shaghai and Zhejiang provinces
- In 2009, Gaokao’s reform in Zhejiang allowed students to take exams up to twice and at chosen times
- Added flexibility
- Reform = eliminate difference between subject streams – humanities and sciences
- University admission process – matchmaking between students and majors
- What’s NEW=
- 1. CONTENT CHANGE - Increased diversity of students’ interests, knowledge and skills
- More forward looking selection of concentrations according to personal interests and strengths
- 2. SCHEDULE CHANGE – When and how often tests are changed
- 3. PROCESS CHANGE – Students are considered as long as have taken one of the electives announced by the program/university
- (before =student’s admissions depended on university’s quota for each tier of admissions in each province
- Challenge = Gaokao dominance in China’s university admissions process
- Transformative change
Reform Gaokao System
Semester abroad and Gap Year - time off for maturity gain and self-discovery (possibility to pass Gaokao system after Gap Year - like in England)
Well-rounded university selection process (like England or USA - reference letter, motivation letter and results)
Policy Implication → Strong leadership and efficient communication (strong leadership required to endorse university selection change, implement semester abroad, and also explain why it’s ok if PISA exam results decrease = ability to face internal and external criticisms - better to get good scores and good skills, rather than extreme of high scores and low skills)
Challenge: Unify curriculum
China is a wide, highly populated and diverse country → need a unified curriculum
Creative, interactive, student-centered curriculum → customized curriculum
Resolve challenge through use of ICT and the consolidation of the digital platform Beijing Digital School = would enable students to have common base throughout the country, access to course content from best teachers in Beijing for example, but also high quality books and more engaging and interactive content; students would also have larger sample to choose from, during for example gap semester or year, and teachers could benefit from a teachers network through the regular and video chat options - if had contact with top teacher during management session, could keep in touch. Of course, student -teacher relations would also improve - with chat options and quicker feedback on material for teachers.
Benefits of ICT: facilitate knowledge transfer, ideas’ exchange and build common base of understanding
Through: E-resources (e-books, MOOCS), Communication (chat options, skype calls)
Can build a more creative, interactive and student-suited curriculum
Financial and technical investment
2 conditions: Internet access and teachers’ ICT skills - imagine workshop, going to top management’s school