Research presentation (more discussion)

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation (More Discussion)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –8th
September 2020
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by
Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet
motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism

I do this research
2nd
2
1-Research Hypothesis Proves
(1st
Proof)
Why Do We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
Equation No. 1
Equation No. 1 tells that –
Matter Dimensions must be created in proportionality with Space Dimensions.
The equation gives us a new vision to answer how the matter and space are created –
and based on it– Space no longer be considered as found independently from matter –
because the equation tells – no matter can be created without space and no space can
be found without matter –
Both are created in proportional dimensions to each other…
But what depth can be behind this equation?
Matter is created of Energy (E= mc2
) – and based on this equation – we may conclude
that – Space is created of Energy –
So this new vision disproves the creation random concept–means- neither matter nor
space can be created by any random process.
On the contrary matter and space dimensions are created based on calculations taken
into considerations the other dimensions.
(1st
proof Conclusion)
Matter Dimensions Are Created In Proportionality With Space Dimensions.
DistanceMoonEarth
DistanceSunEarth
DaimeterMoonThe
DaimeterSunThe
=

I do this research
2nd
3
(2nd
Proof)
How to explain the solar planets order?
Jupiter and Saturn the only 2 plants whose order follows the gravitation equation and
concept – simply – the greater mass (Jupiter) is nearer to the sun – and both planets
orbital distances follow the equation clearly….. but no other planets follow them
So
Let's try to conclude the rule by which the solar planets are ordered
(1)
Mercury- Venus – Earth
These 3 planets order tells, (greater diameter or mass needs greater orbital distance)
The order contradicts the gravity concept because greater mass needs greater orbital
distance and not shorter…
(2)
Jupiter – Saturn- Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
These 5 planets order tells, (greater diameter needs shorter orbital distance)
In this order – the order is done based on planet diameter and not on its mass –
because Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune but Neptune mass is greater than
Uranus while Uranus is nearer to the sun –
So - we can conclude that the planets order here depends on the planet diameter and
not its mass
Also
Because the order (No. 2) uses a reversed rule of the order (No.1) so we may conclude
both orders express by the same vision – that there's a relationship between planet
diameter and orbital distance –if we accept this conclusion – so the order no. 1 can be:
(Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) – this new order shows more consistency
This order may refer to that, Mars orbital distance may be changed through history.
(3) Additional Data
Mercury Diameter x 1092
= Mercury Orbital Distance
Earth Diameter x 1092
= Earth Orbital Distance
Saturn Diameter x 1092
= Saturn Orbital Distance
(2nd
proof Conclusion)
Planet orbital distance may be created in proportionality with its diameter
If this conclusion is correct – so – it supports the previous one that
1st
proof conclusion
Matter Dimensions Are Created In Proportionality With Space Dimensions.

I do this research
2nd
4
(3rd
Proof)
Lorentz Transformation Analysis
Introduction
Why do we need to discuss Lorentz Transformations here?
The previous (2) proves data give us a new vision about how the matter and space are
created –
Classically – matter or particle properties are created through historical developments
Simply–
we don't know for example – Why Earth diameter =12756 km? this value – based on
the classical description – must be found by historical developments and many of
unknown factors
The previous 2 proves tell some new vision – that – Earth diameter =12756 km
because Earth orbital distance = 149.6 million km
This vision is just new in science
The dilemma is that –the provided data can't form a crucial proof for this vision –
specially because – the rate (1092
) between Planet diameter and orbital distance is not
used by all planets and can't create a general rule for the solar system
Also
The planets order doesn't create one clear rule which may support this vision- while
there's a strong feeling of Mars inconsistency in its position – which causes to disturb
the correct order –
Shortly –
There's a feeling that – Matter Dimensions must be created in proportionality
with Space Dimensions – But no crucial proof is provided…
That's why we need to discuss Lorentz Transformations
Lorentz Transformations Vision
Lorentz Transformations provide also a new (strange) vision about how matter
dimensions are created
Lorentz Transformations tell that
Particle properties may be changed by this particle high velocity motion
Based on that – Earth diameter = 12756 km because Earth velocity =30 km/sec but if
Earth velocity be near to light velocity so its diameter may be = 11800 km
It's (again) a new vision contradicts the classical description to answer how matter
dimensions or particle properties are created…
Before to start our discussion we need to know – If Particle own nature (really)
changes with this particle high velocity motion.
So let's start

I do this research
2nd
5
Is Lorentz Length Contraction a real phenomenon or illusion of measurements?
I use Length Contraction as an example of relativistic effects supposed to be occurred
by high velocity motion (Length Contraction – Mass Increasing – Time Dilation)
Let's start our discussion …
Is Particle Own Length Contracted by this particle high velocity motion?
Physics textbooks give 2 contradicting answers – we need to analyze in following:
(1st
Opinion)
No change in Particle own length – but these are illusion of measurements –
Why does this team provide this opinion?
This team tries to save the matter creation classical description – because many and
many of the physics ideas are built on it –
For example
Newton tells us that, Planet moves by Masses gravity forces – that means – Planet
mass must be found before and independently from this planet motion –Lorentz
transformations tell that this mass is changing with its high velocity motion – simply
that will disprove Newton explanation for planet motion.
The previous example is a simple one – in fact – many of the physics ideas depend on
the concept that "Particle Mass Is Created Independently Of Any Other Factor" –
and if particle properties are created as function of this particle motion that may cause
a great disturb for many basic concepts in physics
(2nd
Opinion)
Yes it's a real change in Particle own length –
This team tries to save the physics research method creditability – because – we
attribute any property to particle or electron based on experimental results and
measurements – Simply physics is the science of measurements
i.e.
What's measured in physics that's the real one – so – if the measurements show
particle length contraction that means this contraction is occurred really for this
particle own length
The physicists follow the empirical proves – otherwise they create better machines to
avoid the illusions but in all cases they accept the measurements as facts and can't be
considered at any case as illusions.
Shortly
If we consider some empirical measurements as illusions of measurements without
any theoretical or empirical explanation – that will disprove the experiment as a
method of physics research.
i.e. - We have to accept that "Length Contraction Is A Fact"
Also
I can add one more reason why we should prefer this opinion – that – because

I do this research
2nd
6
- If particle properties are defined correctly while this particle motion is Zero
relative to me - and
- This particle properties will get illusion of measurements in high velocity
motion relative to me – that means – I'm The Universe Reference Point –
- And if we want to avoid our effect on the observation results we have to accept
that particle properties (really) are changed with high velocity motion.
A Conclusion
Particle properties must be changed with this particle high velocity motion
The next question is ….Why?
Why Particle properties are changed with this particle high velocity motion?
Let's try with this question step by step:
- Particle properties are changed with this particle high velocity motion
i.e.
- Particle properties originally are defined as a function of its motion
i.e.
- Earth diameter =12756 km because Earth Velocity =30 km/sec – if this is a true
conclusion – that means – if Earth velocity will be 60 km/sec that will change
Earth diameter! Do we accept this conclusion?!
Shortly
- What is the relationship between Particle own length and its motion velocity?
Why Particle length, mass and time rate should be changed with high velocity
motion?!
Let's try to unify our discussion
- Particle properties created are as a function of this particle motion.
But
- Motion needs Space to be done
i.e.
- Particle properties must be created in proportionality with space dimensions
What does that mean? means
- Our 1st
conclusion (Matter Dimensions are created in proportionality with
Space dimensions) and 2nd
one (there's a proportionality between planet
diameter and orbital distance values) –these both are in consistency with our
3rd
one (Particle properties are created as a function of this particle high
velocity motion)
i.e.
Because
Particle properties are created as a function of this particle high velocity motion

I do this research
2nd
7
So
Matter Dimensions are created in proportionality with Space dimensions
Which causes
The proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance values
Matter Creation Vision
Lorentz tell us so deep vision more than both first 2 conclusions
Matter and space dimensions are created in proportionality – this is a general concept-
because this concept doesn't tell us why Matter and Space dimensions are created
proportional to each other
But
Lorentz Transformations tell us why!
Matter Dimensions are created as a function of this matter motion – now the matter
data is created by its motion – and based on that if matter motion is stopped for any
reason, this matter will be perished
This conclusion can be seen so logically while we know that Matter Dimensions are
changed by this matter high velocity motion and so the motion effects directly on this
matter existence.
Lorentz gives us a clear light and puzzle
There's no doubt we may discover in his meaning behind his transformation equations
– he tells clearly and strongly that
Particle properties (or matter dimensions) may be changed by its high velocity
motion –
It's really new and clear information has no doubt
but the question still behind
Why Particle properties are changed with this particle high velocity motion?
Or
Why particle properties are created as a function of its high velocity motion?
This last question we should keep in mind because it's a cornerstone point in the
research presentation discussion…
This question we should discuss with the hard other questions which are
Why light velocity is standard in all frames?
And
(E= mc2
) Why light velocity is a player in all matter energy definition?

I do this research
2nd
8
(4th
Proof) "Mars Migration Theory"
In (2nd
) proof there was a feeling of inconsistency about Mars position
Where "Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth" must have been the original order and
Mars almost has changed its orbital distance –
If this idea can be proved that will support the claim that "Planet orbital distance is
created in proportionality with its diameter" – let's try to prove that
Giant Impact Hypothesis
Giant impact hypothesis is the most near theory to explain how the moon is created
- The Giant-impact hypothesis suggests that, The Earth Moon is formed from the
ejects of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planet, from this
collision debris Earth gravity created its moon ….etc
But
- Many questions still have no answers in Giant impact hypothesis for example
o Venus almost had a similar collision as Earth but Venus couldn't create a
moon for it., why?
o The lunar magma ocean (LMO) origin because such ocean isn't found on
Earth
o Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Which is middle rate
between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
Mars Migration Theory
- I suppose that Mars orbital distance was 84 mkm – means Mars was found
between Mercury and Venus according to the order (Mercury – Mars – Venus –
Earth)
Then
- Mars has migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current
orbital distance point (228 mkm) – so Mars made a displacement 144 mkm.
So
- Through Mars displacement Motion – Mars had collided with Venus at first
and then With Earth at second – till Mars reach to its current orbital distance
point (228 mkm)
Now let's try to answer the questions
- Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84
mkm to 228 km, had collided with Venus and Earth and pushed all debris in its
motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to
create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their
motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris
and create its moon
- The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is
created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in
it

I do this research
2nd
9
- Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because it's the middle rate
between the 3 planets rates.
Note Please
- Mars had pushed the debris with its motion – so Earth controlled some debris
and created its moon – Mars also could control some debris and created its 2
moons spite of Mars low mass and gravity because the debris lost already their
high motion momentum and that enable Mars to create even 2 moons
Also
- The rest of debris are attracted by Jupiter great gravity and form the steroid
belt.
That means
- Mars itself which had collided with Venus and Earth, caused to create the Earth
Moon – so not another planet did – but Mars itself did that
Also
- There are some ancient features of life on Mars Surface why? because almost
Mars had some life when it was in its original orbital distance (84 mkm) but
because of Mars Migration this life features were disappeared…
- Also we may conclude that – Mars collision with Earth was the reason of the
catastrophe by which the dinosaurs become extinct…
- This analysis can help greatly the conclusion that Mars orbital distance was 84
mkm and the planets order was (Mercury– Mars- Venus – Earth) which will
support the claim that Planet orbital distance is created in proportionality with
its diameter which lead to our 1st
conclusion that Matter dimensions are created
in proportionality with space dimensions.
Also
- Mars diameter is decreased because of the collision with and Venus and
became 6792 km where before this collision Mars diameter must have been
7070 km which perform the equation (7070 km x 1092
= 84 mkm – Mars
original orbital distance was 84 mkm) – that means – Mars Diameter was
decreased by rate 4%

I do this research
2nd
10
(5th
Proof)
Examples Of The Geometrical Effects And Features.
Introduction
This research hypothesis tells that "planet motion depends on light motion"
I have to provide this hypothesis because the solar system motion shows strange
geometrical effects and features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Let's provide some of these strange geometrical effects and features – to show that
The hypothesis is a necessary one for the solar system motion explanation.
Example No. 1
Why These Distances Are Equal?
(1)
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
= Mars Orbital Circumference
= Pluto Neptune Distance
= Pluto eccentricity Distance
= Neptune Orbital Distance/π
= Uranus Orbital Distance /2
= Mercury Jupiter Distance x 2
(2)
Mercury Neptune Distance = Saturn Pluto Distance
Jupiter Pluto Distance = Uranus Neptune Circumference
Earth Neptune Distance = Mercury Saturn Circumference (0.5%)
(3)
Jupiter Mercury Distance = 2 Mercury Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Venus Distance = Venus Orbital Circumference (1.5%)
Jupiter Earth Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference (1.2%)
(Earth and Jupiter at 2 different sides from the sun)
(4)
Jupiter Mercury Distance = Mars Orbital Distance x π (0.6%)
Jupiter Uranus Distance = Venus Jupiter Circumference (0.8%)
Pluto Orbital Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference x 2π
Note Please
The previous distances form around 50% of all distances found in the solar system
Why all these distances equal one other?
How to explain these distances equality in the classical mechanics science – later we
have to discuss some explanation depends on the research hypothesis that (planet
motion depends on light motion)

I do this research
2nd
11
Example No. 2
Data
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 mkm
- The Moon moves per solar day a distance =2.58 mkm
- The Moon orbital circumferences at apogee radius = 2.58 mkm
- The moon moves during its day period (29.53 days) = 2.58 mkm
- Pluto moves during its day period (153.3 hours) = 2.58 mkm
Discussion
The data refers to The Earth Moon
- The moon has to move per a solar day a distance =2.58 mkm = Earth motion
distance per solar day otherwise the moon will be separated from Earth in their
course of motions
- Also the moon moves per solar day a displacement =88000 km and during
29.53 solar days the moon pass (88000 km x 29.53 = 2.58 mkm)
Now let's ask
Why these 3 planets move equal distances during their days periods of time?
i.e.
Why the value 2.58 mkm is used so widely as the data tells us? can that be done by
pure coincidence? Or is there a geometrical reason to cause that?
Note Please
This equation we have seen before
It's the Equation No. 1 but I just add one more term to it –
2.58 mkm = Earth motion distance per solar day – the question is - Why the Equation
uses Earth Radius instead of diameter? This significant question we should discuss
later in some depth (in point No.3 Planet Motion Mechanism)
But
I add this new term to show that – Earth motion per solar day is proportional to Earth
radius -
Which supports Lorentz Transformations conclusion That
Matter Dimensions Are Created as a function of its Motion
I try to show that – the conclusion was not just a theoretical idea – it's used frequently
in the planets data – which tells us again that – The Classical Mechanics Range can't
reach to The Solar System Motion Geometry.
400
RadiusEarth
mkm2.58
DistanceMoonEarth
DistanceSunEarth
DaimeterMoonThe
DaimeterSunThe
===

I do this research
2nd
12
Example No. 3
A- Earth Moon Distance At Perigee Radius (363000 Km) = The Outer Planets
Diameters Total (Error 1%)
B- Earth Moon Distance At Apogees Radius (406000 Km) = The Solar Planets
Diameters Total
C- The Distance between Apogee and Perigee radius (space only without the
moon diameter which moves from perigee to apogee) = the inner planets
diameters total = Earth Circumference (Error 1%)
D- Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius = Saturn Circumference
Note
Earth Mass =the four inner planets masses total (Mercury+ Venus + moon + Mars)
(1%)
Example No. 4
Can 4 planets axial tilts be rated to each other by the same rate =1.0725 as a result of
pure coincidences?
I found it's some how hard
In fact the rate 1.0725 is found with tenths of distances and other different data in the
solar system - and this rate if found by geometrical reason as we have to discuss later
What I try to show is that, the solar system motion geometrical analysis shows
puzzles and data can only be explained by adoption of the research basic hypothesis
that
"Planet motion depends on light motion"
d23.4tiltaxialEarth
d25.2tiltaxialMars
d25.2tiltaxialMars
d26.7tiltaxialSatrun
d26.7tiltaxialSaturn
28.3dtiltaxialNeptune
==

I do this research
2nd
13
(6th
Proof)
Planet Motion depends on Light Motion
I-Data
(1)
Light beam its velocity c (0.3 mkm/sec) travels during a solar day (86400 seconds) a
distance =25920 mkm
(2)
All solar planets motions distances total per a solar day =17.75 mkm
(I add Earth Moon Motion Distance to the 9 planets motions distances total per day)
i.e.
during 1461 days – the planets motions distances total will be = 25920 mkm
means
the distance light passes in 1 solar day – all planets pass together the same distance in
1461 days
II- Discussion
Light travels 25920 mkm during 1 solar day
And
Planets passed distances total =25920 mkm during 1461 solar days
What's the relationship between 25920 mkm of light and 25920 mkm of planets?
I suppose the light created the distance 25920 mkm (because Space = energy) and the
planets move following this light motion…
Why this idea is true one?
Because
1 solar day is a period defined by Earth rotation around its axis once per day
And
1461 days is Earth Cycle (365 days +365 days +365 days +366 days =1461 days)
i.e.
Both periods of time are found by motions done in the solar system – means – they
aren't random periods of time but periods are created by solar system motions and
based on its geometrical rules..
I suggest that- the light is the source of energy- so light created the distance and the
planets received the energy provided by the light motion and created the cycle 1461
days as a cycle of their following this light motion
We should discuss the mechanism later
(note please – because we deal with light motion the distance value 25920 mkm is
seen by us as a period of time 25920 years = The Precession Cycle – that because
x=ct and when c= 1 so x = t means the time and distance values be equivalent and
exchangeable)
Conclusion
(Planet and light pass the same distance but with different rate of times)

I do this research
2nd
14
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
2-1 The Hypothesis Understanding
2-2 The Hypothesis Deep Vision
2-1 The Hypothesis Understanding
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
The research hypothesis tells us a clear idea, which is
The planet moves depending on light motion
As the horse draw the cart – similar to that – the light beam leads planet motion –
But
We should notice that – the research hypothesis doesn’t mean that there's a light beam
for each planet –
The hypothesis tells us that
One light beam causes all solar planets to move – means – the light beam motion
should be considered as an engine and the solar planets together form one train
So
The light motion (the engine) causes the solar planets to move (train carriages)
Now the hypothesis assumes new feature of the solar planets motions
The planets move together one unified motion as train carriages
Although the planets motions velocities are different from each other but this fact
can't disprove the train carriages motion –that because – the machine of gears has
different size gears where some gears rotate fast and others slowly – still the gears
machine motion is one unified motion transported from one gear to another
Conclusion
"The Planets move Together One Unified Motion As Train Carriages, And This
Unified Motion Is Done depends On One Light Beam Motion Which works As
An Engine For This Train".

I do this research
2nd
15
2-2 The Hypothesis Deep Vision
Planet Motion depends on Light Motion
Because
Matter is Created out of Light
An Experiment For Explanation
- 2 light beams travel with light velocity (0.3 mkm/sec), parallel to each other.
- The difference between our and their motions velocities = light velocity
But
- The difference in motions velocities between each other = zero
So
- How we see these light beams?!
- We see them as light beams because of the difference in motions velocities.
And
- How each light beam will see the other light beam?
- As a matter ( Particle) ! why?
- Because there's no difference in motions velocities between them –
i.e.
- Particle has no real entity but particle is a light beam we see in matter form –
because there's no difference in velocities between our motion and this particle
motion (this light beam motion)
Now let's add one more hypothesis….
Research hypothesis No. (2)
Human mind needs a motion with light velocity to perform the realization process.
i.e.
human mind realization process depends on some motion done by light velocity.
Can this new hypothesis help our investigation, let's see in following…

I do this research
2nd
16
Light and Matter Forms Discussion:
(1) Lorentz Discussion led us to the conclusion that – Particle properties must be
defined originally as a function of this particle high velocity motion– because
particle properties are changed with this particle high velocity motion – how to
explain that? – Particle Properties are defined originally based on light
velocity motion (found in our mind) – where particle has no real entity but it's a
light beam we see in particle form (matter form) because there's no difference
in motions velocities between our mind realization process motion and this
light beam motion.
This explanation may help greatly in Lorentz Transformations Analysis.
(2) How can observer effect on the observation results?
In some experiment – a subatomic object behaves as a particle only after its
observation – means – the object which behaved before as particle or wave – no
longer behaves as wave but behaves only as particle after its observation and
measurement- why? how can the observer effect on the observation results?
The observer effects on the observation results by the light motion velocity
which is found inside human mind and used in human mind realization process.
(3) E=mc2
why light velocity is an effective player in all matters definition?
Because the matter is a light beam we see in matter form as a result of the
human mind realization process – now light velocity (c ) is used by human
mind realization process and because of that we find light velocity in all matter
definition equation.
(4) Why light velocity (c ) is standard for all frames? Because light velocity is
used in our mind realization process and that means our 5 senses can't discover
any higher light velocity even if such velocity is found. So the human senses
are controlled by light velocity (c =0.3 mkm/sec) and because of that we see
this velocity controls the universe – each time we look at mirror we see our
faces that because the light velocity is found in our mind realization process for
that we see this velocity in everywhere around. (that doesn't guarantee that
there's no velocity higher than light velocity 0.3 mkm/sec but that guarantees if
such higher velocity is found our 5 senses will never discover it)
(5) Double production experiment – proves that – matters (electron and positron)
can be created by electromagnetic waves (Gamma rays 1.2 Mev)
(6) Light Coherence (Double Slit Experiment –or Young Experiment) produces
bight fringes and dark fringes – from this experiment we have learnt the
following:

I do this research
2nd
17
o The dark fringes can be created by light coherence – mean – light
coherence can create another form (dark fringes – darkness) – which can
help to accept that the matter is another form of light
o The solar planets distribution correspondents perfectly to the light
coherence interference where the greatest breadth fringe is found in the
middle (Jupiter is the planet no. 5 in order) and the breadth is decreased
gradually by both sides (Mars is found in wrong position).
Research Hypothesis Better Understanding:
- Because the matter is created out of light and the born matter follows its light
parent motion…
Based on that, we can conclude the following:
- The Solar system is not only a train its carriages travel together in one unified
motion
But
- The solar system is one building or one body – each planet is a part of this
building or a member of this same body
- Because the solar planets are created from the same one source (light energy)
and move pushed by the same one engine (light motion) and because of that
they are just one body and each planet is a member of this same body
Based on that
- The solar planets data must be created relative and complementary to each
other – and as we have seen in the double production experiment – where the
first produced particle was an electron we could guess that the next particle
must be positron to save the total charge = zero – and similar to this same rule
all solar planets data are created depending and relative to each other
- Now this analysis lead us to a very significant conclusion which is
A Conclusion
There's One Equation Control All Solar Planets Data
That because the planets are created from the same source relative and
complementary to each other, that means, any planet data can be concluded by other
planets data –

I do this research
2nd
18
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
3-1 Matter Creation 3-2 Mass Gravity Creation
3-3 Is there a parallel universe? 3-4 The Clock
3-5 Light Velocity Limitation
3-6 Earth Moon Motion Geometrical Effects Analysis
3-1 Matter Creation
The hypothesis tells that – the matter is created out of light But How?
The noticeable point here we need to taken into consideration is the relativistic effects
which are created by light motion – so let's summarize this notice in following:
- High velocity motion causes relativistic effects
- Relativistic effects are (length contraction – mass increasing and time dilation)
- We should interest for the feature (time dilation) because this dilation in time
(different rates of time) will cause a delaying in seeing the born matter! How?
- While we see the light in matter form – the matter – for us – will be delayed to
be seen because of the different rates of time (time dilation) – means – the
matter for us needs to be born in time –
Shortly
- If light beam passes us now and this passing cause us to see this light in a
matter form we have to see the born matter after (5 minutes for example)
following to the light motion- means – the light is gone and disappeared and
after that we will see the matter to be born
i.e.
- The matter which is created out of light can't be seen immediately as in the
mirage case or in any similar wrong vision (a broken spoon in a Cup of tea) –
Because light motion causes relativistic effects (time dilation) and that causes
the matter to be born in time – now the light which is the source of this matter
is disappeared already but the matter is still giving birth during a period of time.
Let's try to see that as deep as possible
- Light travels freely and no change is found in its nature as a result of its motion.
so light travels and still be seen as light beam by us…
But
- Suppose – some change is occurred for part of the light energy – this change
causes a new feature which is that "The Motion Causes The Light Energy To
Be Born In A Matter Form" – based on this change in light nature the matter
will be born in time by its motion.
How to understand that?
- There's change happened for a part of the light beam energy nature – and this
part only will be seen in matter form with its motion – but the rest part of the
light beam nature doesn't change – means – with motion – this light beam will
be still a light beam –

I do this research
2nd
19
i.e.
- We have one light beam is seen in 2 different forms – one part will be seen in
matter form by its motion – and the other part will be seen in light form by its
motion
- This is a simple idea – imagine a light beam travels into a solar cell and
produces some electric current – the energy which we see in a light beam – this
same energy is found in the electric current – they both work as one team.
Why we need this explanation?
- Because I try to show that – the matter properties are created as a function of
this same matter motion – but how? If the matter isn't created yet! Whose
motion will create it? the light beam part which its nature changed…
Note please
- No really change is happened in the light nature – the matter is born for us in
time – but this time we don't see as a passive value – it's a positive work is done
by the matter to be born – as a pregnant woman – needs 9 months to give a
birth – that doesn't mean the woman will be in waiting does nothing till the
child be born – she has a job to perform the process – and because of that – the
matter has a job to be born out of light before our eyes and this job is the matter
motion and the matter gets a reward for its continuous job which is that the
matter data is created depends on its motion.
- It's the best near explanation to answer how the matter is created out of light.
But
- Why I can't give a complete account about the matter creation?
Because
a. Lorentz transformations tell us just 3 changes in particle properties as result of
high velocity motion (length contraction- mass increasing - time dilation) – that
doesn't guarantee that there are no more changes still we need to discover.
b. Before All – The Basic Difficulty Is That-
Neither Relativity Theory nor Lorentz Transformations answer the main question
which is – What's happened on the day after the event?!
How the particle effected by relativistic effects will cooperate with other particles?
How a system effected by relativistic effects will cooperate with a system isn't
effected by relativistic effects? how can we create a general map for both systems
together.
(Because the matter is supposed to be created out of light– so the relativistic effects
are needed now to be inserted in our daily life system)

I do this research
2nd
20
3-2 Mass Gravity Creation
"Planet motion depends on light motion"
Does that mean, no gravity forces cause the planet motion?
Planet moves indeed by masses gravity forces!
How??
Matter is created out of light beam – as we have discussed - that means
Planet matter is created out of light
Also
We know that matter properties are created as a function of its motion – means –
planet matter is created by this planet motion
The matter is created because of its motion – we have discussed that deeply before –
So – let's ask
What will be happened for the matter if this matter motion is stopped?
The matter will be perished
The matter is created as a function of its motion and its existence depend on this
motion and without this motion the matter will be perished
The matter knows that perfectly
For that reason
The matter creates masses gravity forces which is the matter perish-resistance
What does that mean?
The matter creates a reason to guarantee that, the motion based on which the matter is
created will be continuous and never to be stopped
Masses gravity force is the matter method to guarantee the continuous motion
This conclusion is so important one because
It tells that, the matter masses gravity force causes a motion is similar and identical to
that motion based on which the matter is created
It's the same one motion – this motion is caused by light and led to the matter creation
and this same motion the matter masses gravity will create to save the matter
existence
Now – if the motions are identical – why we suppose that – planet motion depends on
light motion – where the planet moves really by the masses gravity forces?
Because the motion design and data can't be created by the Rigid Body Motion
Mechanics-
It's the light which creates the distance and matter in proportional dimensions and
creates the motion suitable whole system ….
Simply the light creates the railway but the masses gravity pushes the train on this
railway – the geometrical features can't be created by The Classical Mechanics.

I do this research
2nd
21
3-3 Is There A Parallel Universe?
This is a very simple idea
As we have seen -
The light travels freely and creates the distance and matter
Then
The matter is created by the light motion based on different rates of time –
So we have 2 pictures for every thing
For example
The distance 25920 mkm – light is passed this distance simply in one solar day
But
This same distance 25920 mkm – is passed by all planets motions during 1461 days
Planets motions for the distance (25920 mkm) depends on light motion energy for this
same distance (29520 mkm)
Now
We have seen this distance 25920 mkm passed 2 times – one by light motion and the
other by planets motions with a difference in time =1460 days
That means – There Are 2 Pictures For The Universe
i.e.
There's A Parallel Universe For Our Matter Universe

I do this research
2nd
22
3-4The Clock
Research hypothesis tells us that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
How these motions are done?
Research hypothesis No (3)
Light travels for a period = 1 second of time and by this motion energy a planet
moves for a period = 1 solar day.
This hypothesis discussion is divided into 2 points
3-4-1 The hypothesis explanation
3-4-2 The hypothesis Proves
3-4-1 The Hypothesis Explanation
Light motion for 1 second produces an energy can be used to push a planet to move
for 1 solar day
Example No. 1
- Jupiter moves per a solar day a distance = 1.1318 mkm
- If there's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec -
- (the difference 2.5% may be considered as an error in calculations)
I want to say that – Jupiter moves for 1 solar day a distance = light motion for 1
second if there's a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
In point no. (3-5) we discuss the proves concerning the light velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
In example No.1 I try to show the basic idea of the hypothesis no. 3
Which is that
The distance is passed by light in 1 second = the distance is passed by planet in 1 solar
day – this idea I provide as a hypothesis – but in fact – this idea I got from the planets
data – where example no. 1 shows one of this data – and in the hypothesis proves (3-
4-2) I should provide many other data with its discussion
But
Here – in this point- We have to explain how this mechanism works
How 1 second of light motion can push a planet for 1 solar day?
This mechanism is the reason why the point title is (The Clock) because the solar
system works perfectly as a clock
Let's try to explain that in following

I do this research
2nd
23
The Machine Mechanism
The solar system basic task is to use energy of a motion of 1 second to produce a
motion of 1 solar day
How to do that? let's use a very simple explanation
- a planet uses the motion of 1 second and produces an equivalent motion of 1 minute
- a planet uses the motion of 1 minute and produces an equivalent motion of 1 hour
- a planet uses the motion of 1 hour and produces an equivalent motion of 1 day
How that?? because
1 second on a planet = 1 minute on another planet = 1 hour one third planet = 1 day
on fourth planet = 1 year on fifth planet = 1461 days on sixth planet…etc
Let's summarize the basic idea found behind this simple explanation in following:
(There are different rates of time in the solar system)
This is the Method by which the solar system uses energy of 1 second motion to
produce a motion of 1 solar day
And this is the method by which I try to prove the hypothesis
Now let's see if there are different rates of time in the solar system
Are there Different rates of time in the solar system?
The Discussion
Example No. 2
Equation No. (I)
10921 km (the moon circumference) x 86400 seconds = 940 mkm (Earth orbital
circumference)
Equation No. (I) tells that – If Earth revolves around the sun one complete revolution
on one solar day only – so in this case – the moon circumference will be = a distance
of Earth motion for 1 second period of time
But Earth revolves around the sun in 1 year and not on 1 day only
So this equation refers to another rate of time – it may tell that
(1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth)
This conclusion can give theoretical explanation for Equation No. (I)
Equation No. (II)
10921 km (the moon circumference) x 27.3 days = 0.3 mkm
Equation No. (II) tells that – if the moon rotates around its axis once per day (as Earth
does) so in this case the moon will pass during its orbital period (27.3 days) a distance
=300000 km= light motion distance for 1 second of time.
Here 1 second is used 2 times with the moon circumference –
Equation No. (III)
43000 km x 27.3 days x 0.99=1.16 mkm
Equation No. (III) tells that – if the moon is a point (without diameter) and moves
from perigee to apogee every day (43000 km) – so the moon during its orbital period
(27.3 days) will pass a distance =1.16 mkm (there's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec we
will discuss later) – here again the moon motion refers to a period 1 second of time.

I do this research
2nd
24
(Note please, the rate 0.99 is used for a geometrical necessity – which is is discussed
independently in appendix no.1 found in this paper end)
I want to say that- this research is found basically because the solar system motion
shows geometrical effects and features can't be created by rigid body motion
mechanics – the previous 3 equations are examples for such strange geometrical
effects and features and because of these effects I had to suppose that "Planet motion
depends on light motion"
Example No. 3
In previous equations we have supposed that (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth)
But in fact
Earth moves daily a distance =2.58 mkm and the moon moves per month (29.53 days)
a distance =2.58 mkm ,Where the distances are equal we may conclude the following:
1 day on Earth = 29.53 days on the moon
But
We know that (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth)
So
1 day on the sun =365.25 x 29.53 = 10747 days on the moon
But
10747 days = Saturn Orbital Period
I try to explain that – this data is created based on this analysis
Means
The moon circumference =10921 km because 1 day on the sun =1 year on Earth – and
Saturn orbital period =10747 days because the moon synodic month =29.53 days…
I want to say that
The light travels first, and by light energy the matter and space are created and also
the light motion design the frame of the planet motion and data required for this
motion – then the planet follows the light.
Note please
(1)
We have seen that light travels during a solar day a distance = 25920 mkm and the
planets pass this distance 25920 mkm during 1461 days – where the distances are
equal we concluded that (1 day of light motion = 1461 days of total planets motions)
(2)
I want to say that – the data shows the different rates of time – as we have discussed –
regardless how these rates of time are created –this difference in the time rates are
recorded in the planets creation data by different ways (more discussion will be in the
hypothesis proves 3-4-2)

I do this research
2nd
25
3-4-2 The Hypothesis Proves
Let's remember hypothesis no. 3 in following before to discuss its proves
Research hypothesis No (3) (Revision)
Light travels for a period = 1 second of time and by this motion energy a planet
moves for a period = 1 solar day.
THE PROVES
I- Data (Equations)
A- (1/4 C) x 4 C = C2
B- 3.02 mkm = 1.16 mkm x 2.6 but 2.082 mkm = 0.838 mkm x 2.5
C- 1.16 mkm = 0.47 mkm x 2.5
E- 1.16 mkm =0.406 mkm x 2.83
F- 2.41 mkm = 2.082 mkm x 1.16
B- 10921 km x 27.3 days = 300000 km but 88000 km x 29.53 days = 2.58 km
II- Discussion
How can we prove this hypothesis?
I try to show that – some data which is created for 1 solar day, this same data is used
in some equation for 1 second –
i.e.
the same value is seen by 2 eyes – one eye sees it based on 1 solar day and the other
eye sees based on 1 second – and that means – this data is created for both rates of
time – that what we try to discover and prove in the previous equations explanation
the basic concept behind is that
the matter is created with defined data – now if this same matter is used in many
different rates of time – so this matter data must be suitable and be in consistency with
these different rates of time
as we have seen the moon circumference (10921 km) which is in consistency with the
rate of time 1 year period in Earth = 1 day on the sun –
regardless the sun or Earth – the basic point behind is that- the moon circumference is
created by a value must be in consistency with both rates of time
because of that the equation (10921 km x 86400 sec = 940 mkm) works
i.e. The matter data shows the different rates of time –
let's discuss the equations in following

I do this research
2nd
26
Equation No. (A)
(1/4 C) x 4 C = C2
(1)
The solar planets motions distances total per a solar day =17.75 mkm – we know that
(2)
We know that (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth)
So
1 day on Earth= 237 seconds on the sun
So we have a distance =17.75 mkm and time = 237 seconds and the velocity =1/4 C
(1/4C = 75000 km /sec)
(3)
I suppose there's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec (will be proved in point 3-5)
This value 1.16 mkm/sec will produce 1.2 mkm/sec = 4C
So
1/4 C x 4C = C2
What's C2
?
It's the source of the sun rays energy
The sun rays isn't produced by any nuclear interactions in the sun – this energy is
produced by the solar planets motions energies total
i.e.
The planets motions energies total produce the sun rays energy – to do that – the
planets motions distances total for 1 solar day (17.75mkm) should be used for a
period (237 seconds) which is another rate of time
Note please
How to produce 1.2 mkm/sec from 1.16 mkm?
Light travels 1 second and passes 1.16 mkm which we see as Jupiter motion distance
per one solar day
And
Earth rotates around its axis once per solar day which mean Earth moves 40000 km
per solar day (Earth Circumference) – so we will add only
1.16 mkm + 40000 km = 1.2 mkm per solar day which equal 1.2 mkm/sec = 4C
That may answer some old questions for example …..
Why does the sun diameter = Jupiter Circumference x π ? or
Why does the sun circle Earth during 365.25 days giving the same face always and
not circle any other planet?
Because Earth and Jupiter are major players in the sun rays energy creation…
(Note 17.75 mk = 4.095 mk Mercury + 3.02 mk Venus + 2.58 mk Earth + 2.58 mk Earth
Moon +2.082 mk Mars +1.138 mk Jupiter + 0.838 mk Saturn + 0.587 mk Uranus + 0.47 mk
Neptune +0.406 mk Pluto)

I do this research
2nd
27
Additional Data
The Sun Gravity Value
Gravity Equation (Gerges Francis Equation)
Solar Planet Gravity Equation
I- Data
Table No. 1
Planet Equation Resulted Registered Error
The Sun (Earth/Sun diameters rate)2
(Sun Mass/
Earth Mass)* earth gravity
= (1/109)2
* 333000*9.8= 274
274 274 0
Moon (3.66)2
x (0.073 / 5.97) x 9.8 1.6 m/sec2
1.6 m/sec2
0
Mercury (2.61)2
x (0.23/5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2
3.7 m/sec2
0
Venus (1.0538)2
x 4.87 /5.97) x 9.8 8.9 m/sec2
8.9 m/sec2
0
Earth 9.8 9.8 9.8 0
Mars (1.878)2
x (0.642 / 5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2 3.7 m/sec2 0
Jupiter (0.0892)2
x (1898 / 5.97) x 9.8 24.7 m/sec2 23.1 m/sec2 6.9%
Saturn (0.10582)2
x (568/5.97) x 9.8 10.44 m/sec2 9 m/sec2 16%
Uranus (0.25)2
x (86.8/5.97) x 9.8 8.9 8.7 2.3%
Neptune (0.2575)2
x (102/ 5.97) x 9.8 11.1 m/sec2
11 m/sec2
0.9%
Pluto (5.337)2
(0.0131 / 5.97) x 9.8 0.6125 m/sec2
0.6 m/sec2
2%
II- Discussion
1. We can see that, the Equation is working sufficiently with all planets and even the sun
follows this same equation, except with Jupiter and Saturn there are big error (6.9%
and 16% respectively…. Why?)
2. Jupiter error is around 7.25%, also for Saturn, if Saturn diameter in increased with
rate 7.25% to be 129500km … in this case there will be no error in his gravity
equation… the rate 7.25 is another using for our known rate (1.0725) – means the
same rates are identical but the difference is found by geometrical necessity – means
the great errors are found by because of relativistic effects (1.0725) which we will
discuss in the next point (3-5).
3. we need to observe and analyze deeply The Sun Equation in row No.1 of the
previous table, because this equation supports my claim that the sun is originated
based on the planets motions energies total – simply the sun data is created depending
on the planets data and this gravity equation is one more proof for that
Please review my paper
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a Real One? http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0381
Gerges Equations For Solar Group Geometry https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0564
gravityEarth)
MassEarthThe
MassPlanetThe
()
DiameterPlanetThe
DiameterEarth
(gravityplanetThe 2
××=

I do this research
2nd
28
Equation No. (B)
3.02 mkm = 1.16 mkm x 2.6
Venus moves per solar day a distance =3.02 mkm
Light travels in 1 second a distance =1.16 mkm/sec
But
Venus axial tilt =177.4 degrees = 180 degrees – 2.6 degrees
i.e.
Venus Motion distance per a solar day depends on light motion per 1 second period
and produce 2.6 degrees which causes Venus axial tilt to be 177.4 degrees
Now let's see if it's truth!
2.082 mkm (Mars velocity daily) = 0.838 mkm (Saturn velocity daily) x 2.5
2.5 degrees = Saturn orbital inclination
The previous example tries to show that – the motions velocities effect on each other
to produce the motion data (planet orbital inclination and axial tilt)
The previous example is significant because
Saturn orbital distance = Mars orbital circumference which show specific relationship
between Saturn and Mars, that supports the claim that, Venus Velocity per solar day
depends on light motion for 1 second (if there's a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/se)
Equation No. (C)
1.16 mkm = 0.47 mkm x 2.5
0.47 mkm = Neptune motion distance per a solar day
2.5 degrees = Saturn orbital inclination
This data supports the previous explanation – specially because
Neptune orbital distance = Saturn orbital distance x π
What I try to do is - to show that – the data is used by 2 hands – one in solar day
period and one in second period of time – the point here is that – where the matter has
defined data, this data should be defined based on the different rates of time if such
difference is found otherwise the machine can't work – and because of that we can
discover the different rates of time in the solar system because these rates of time are
recorded in the matter data
For example
Neptune orbital circumference x π =90000 km
But C2
= 90000 mkm if it's used for 1 second – also
C2
= 90000 = 2872.5 mkm (Uranus orbital distance) x π3
(where π3
= Uranus axial tilt
/ Jupiter axial tilt)

I do this research
2nd
29
Equation No. (D)
1.16 mkm =0.406 mkm x 2.83
1.16 mkm = light motion for 1 second
0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance per solar day –
28.3 degrees = Neptune axial tilt
How 2.83 became 28.3?? because (Mercury velocity/ Pluto velocity) =10
What relationship between Mercury and Pluto? And why this relationship is effective
here? we have to wait to the next point (3-5) to discover that…
Equation No. (F)
10921 km x 27.3 days = 300000 km but 88000 km x 29.53 days = 2.58 km
We have seen this equation before
Let's discuss as deep as possible in following….
If the moon rotates around its axis once per solar day (as Earth does) it would pass a
distance = 300000 km = light motion for 1 second during its orbital period (27.3 d)
(it's a motion for 1 second)
But
In fact the moon passes during (29.53 days) a distance =2.58 mkm
And Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 mkm
(it’s a motion for 1 solar day)
Is 27.3 days = 29.53 days?? No
29.53 =1.0725 x 27.3 days (the rate 1.0725) we need to discuss the next point( 3-5)
to explain it which will prove that both values are equal
This equation gives more a light concerning Earth and moon motion – but we need to
discuss the velocity 1.16 mkm/sec before to see this vision more clear..

I do this research
2nd
30
3-5 Light Velocity Limitation
Research hypothesis No (4)
There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
THE PROVES
I-Data
Equation no. (a)
(Pluto orbital circumference – Jupiter orbital circumference) x 2π = 2 x 1.16 mkm/se
x 86400 seconds
Equation no. (b)
4222.6 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference)
But
during 4222.6 hours (Mercury Day Period) Mercury moves a distance =720 mkm
(Mercury Jupiter Distance)
Note Please
Now let's ask
4900 mkm = 2π x 778.6 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Distance)
778.6 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Distance) = 1.0725 x 720 mkm (Mercury Jupiter distance)
(The rate 1.0725 is found by Lorentz length Contraction)
Equation no. (c)
5040 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 5848 mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance)
Mercury day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days
Equation no. (d)
930 seconds x 2π mkm/sec = 5848 mkm (but 930 mkm =Jupiter Earth distance)
(when Jupiter And Earth Be On 2 Different Sides From The Sun)
940 seconds x 2π mkm/sec = 5906 mkm (but 940 mkm = Earth orb. Circumfer.)
But
670 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 778.6 mkm (but 670 mkm =Jupiter Venus distance)
627 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 720 mkm (error 1%) (but 627 mkm =Jupiter Earth distance)
580 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 670 mkm

I do this research
2nd
31
Note Please
- Light known velocity 0.3mkm/sec needs 500 s to pass Earth orbital distance
149.6 mkm
- 670 mkm = Venus Jupiter Distance
Equation no. (e)
Earth velocity = 2π x Pluto velocity
But 4222.6 seconds = 2π x 670 seconds
Also
Equation no. (f)
(1)
1433 days x 0.406 mkm/day (Pluto velocity) = 580 mkm
And
365.25 days (Earth orbital period) x 0.406 mk/d = 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance)
(2)
1433 days x 4.095 mkm/day (Mercury velocity) =5848 mkm
346.6 days x4.095 mkm/day (Mercury velocity) =1433 mkm
84 days x4.095 mkm/day (Mercury velocity) =346.6 mkm
But
5040 seconds = 84 minutes which Mercury uses as 84 days to follow the previous
series reaching to the distance 5848 mkm based on the period 1433 days which is
used by Pluto (also) to produce 580 mkm
Note Please
5906 mkm (Pluto orbital distance) = 1.16 mkm/sec x 5127 seconds
(5127 mkm = Jupiter Pluto distance)
seconds4222.6
seconds5040
Distance)Orbital(Jupitermkm778.6
Distance)Jupiter(Earthmkm930
=

I do this research
2nd
32
II-Discussion
Notice No. 1
We remember hypothesis no. 1 that (Planet motion depends on light motion)
But
Based on the data – the geometrical necessity shows the following conclusion:
"Light Travels Along A Circle Circumference And Planet Moves Along This
Same Circle Radius"
i.e.
If Planet moves depending on light motion – so both motions doesn't show the same
distance but show a circle circumference for the light motion and this same circle
radius for the planet motion – based on that – planet motion indeed depend on light
motion – but pass only a part of the light motion distance – because of that we find the
rate 2π is repeated in the equations….
Notice No. 2
We don't discuss here how the light travels along a circle circumference (curved
Trajectory) because this trajectory isn't necessary to be curved for the light motion but
it's seen by us as a curved Trajectory (a circle circumference)- we see the result of
action according to our position as an observer – so it's not necessary to be seen by the
light as a curved Trajectories
Let's analyze the previous equations as deep as possible
Equation no. (a)
(Pluto orbital circumference – Jupiter orbital circumference) x 2π = 2 x 1.16
mkm/sec x 86400 seconds
Equation no. (a) tells that – the difference in distances between Pluto & Jupiter orbital
circumferences is considered as a radius in a circle its circumference = 202000 mkm
Light beam travels during 2 solar days along this circumference if (only) this light
beam velocity =1.16 mkm/sec - but the radius of this circle is produced by Pluto and
Jupiter motions
Light passes the circle circumference in 2 solar days but the circle radius is created by
Pluto and Jupiter motions based on their orbital periods –
i.e.
The same distance is passed 2 times (1st
) by light (2nd
) by planets – both motions
passed the same distance but with different rates of time – this is the reason which
creates different rates of time for each planet –these different rates of time are used in
the solar system motion (Review 3-2 The Clock)
("the same distance" here means the circle circumference for light motion and this
same circle radius for planet motion)
Conclusion
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion

I do this research
2nd
33
Note Please
I have used 2π to produce 2 solar days and could use π to produce 1 solar day!
So why I have used this 2π? We remember that (Space = Energy)
The distance 202000 mkm is a distance recorded in the solar system motions –it's an
energy sent from Jupiter to Pluto and Pluto reflected this energy toward the inner
planets – so this same energy 202000 mkm is recorded once again in the solar system
other distances – let's explain that in following:
- Pluto reflected the energy without using any part of it to Neptune
- Neptune used 14% of the whole energy to build its orbital circumference and
reflected the rest of energy into 2 equal trajectories each has 86400 mkm – one
trajectory is sent to Earth and Venus and the other trajectory is sent toward
Mercury –
(Neptune Orb. Circumference –Venus orb. Circumference) x 2π =2 x 86400mkm
- These are the 2 trajectories of energy are sent toward the inner planets and I
have used Venus as a middle point for the 3 planets (Mercury – Venus – Earth)
- Mars receives no energy here because Mars had changed its original orbital
distance from (84 mkm) into its new one (228 mkm) –that's why Mars had to
find another Trajectory to receive its required energy.
i.e.
- 202000 mkm is a value recorded in the solar system distances.
Conclusion
Planet motion depends on light motion - In the current case we see that
When the light beam travels along the circle circumference, the planet travels
along this same circle radius
Equation no. (b)
4222.6 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference)
But
during 4222.6 hours (Mercury Day Period) Mercury moves a distance =720 mkm
(Mercury Jupiter Distance)
Now let's ask
4900 mkm = 2π x 778.6 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Distance)
As we have discussed– when a circle circumference 4900 mkm is passed by light
travel so planet travels through its radius (778.6 mkm)
So
Mercury travels during 4222.6 h. a distance = 778.6 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Distance)
But It's Not True!!
Mercury travels during 4222.6 h. a distance = 720 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Distance)
Let's ask
What's relationship between 778.6 mkm and 720 mkm?
778.6 mkm = 1.0725 x 720 mkm (Mercury Jupiter distance)

I do this research
2nd
34
(The rate 1.0725 is found by Lorentz length Contraction- will be discussed in the next
point directly)
i.e.
778.6 mkm is contracted by length contraction effect with rate 1.0725
Means
The distance 778.6 mkm = the distance 720 mkm but because the distance 778.6 mkm
passed through another frame relative to us so it's contracted and we see it =720 mkm
i.e.
light travels 4900 mkm (the circle circumference) during 4222.6 seconds
Mercury travels 720 mkm (mercury Jupiter dist.) during 4222.6 hours (mercury day
period)
The same distance is passed but with different rates of time – light travels during
seconds but mercury moves during hours! Why different rates of time? Because we
deal with light motions which creates relativistic effects
This same result we concluded in equation no. (a) - light travels during 2 solar days
but Pluto and Jupiter motions are done during their orbital periods
The same distance with different rate of times
How to understand that?
The light motion during 4222.6 seconds provided energy which mercury received and
move by it
So Mercury moves toward the source of energy (Jupiter) using different rate of time
Equation no. (c)
5040 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 5848 mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance)
Mercury day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days
Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days
i.e.
The value 5040 seconds isn't part of Mercury day period – but it's defined clearly by 2
values (mercury day period and 176 solar days)
Light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec pass during 5040 seconds a distance = 5848
mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance) ! why?
Because
Light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) is energy sent from Jupiter toward Pluto and Mercury so
both connected with each other by this same energy (1.16 mkm/sec)
If we consider these values are independent from each other we can reach to nothing –
the value 5040 seconds and 176 days and Mercury day period are values created
depending of each other as result of the planets motions – but the mechanism still
need more depth to be seen – any way we see that – the light velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
(if found really) it connects almost Jupiter with Mercury and Pluto

I do this research
2nd
35
Note Please
Research hypothesis No (3) told us that "Light travels for a period = 1 second of
time and by this motion energy a planet moves for a period = 1 solar day"
Jupiter motion distance during 1 solar day = 1.1318 mkm
Which is very near to = 1.16 mkm
(error 2.5%)
That tells us, Jupiter in different ways is related to the value 1.16 mkm which I
suppose it as a light beam velocity
light travels for 1 second (1.16 mkm) and by this energy Jupiter moves for 1 solar day
But let's try to see as deep as possible the mechanism behind this value 5848 mkm
Equation no. (d)
930 seconds x 2π = 5848 mkm (but 930 mkm =Jupiter Earth distance)
(when Jupiter And Earth Be On 2 Different Sides From The Sun)
5848 mkm = Mercury Pluto Distance
940 seconds x 2π = 5906 mkm (but 940 mkm = Earth orb. Circumference)
But
627 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 720 mkm (but 627 mkm =Jupiter Earth distance)
(note please – light known velocity 0.3mkm/sec needs 500 s to pass Earth orbital
distance 149.6 mkm)
Note Please
1. The distances values are used as periods of time because we deal with light
motions where x =ct when c=1 so x=t
2. Equation (d) shows that the value 5848 mkm is created depending on Earth
Jupiter Distance when Earth and Jupiter be at different sides from the sun – this
distance is used as a period of time by the light motion – now – that shows the
mechanism complexity – means – planet motion depends on light motion but
the chain is not limited here – instead – light motion depends on planets
motions data and because of that the motions are twisted with one another –
that makes light motions is continuous part with planet motion but we can't see
a clear separation line between both because light uses the planets results data
in its motion – planet motion distance is used as periods of time as seen in the
previous equation – the noticeable data is that – the data is created depending
on each other – so no pure coincidences we may claim here – on the contrary
we face a directed data depend on each other to produce targeted values and not
any random values – the next equation may show that more clear

I do this research
2nd
36
Equation no. (e)
Earth velocity = 2π x Pluto velocity
But 4222.6 seconds = 2π x 670 seconds
Also
Equation No. (e) helps our argument greatly
We deal simply with the same values 4222.6 seconds, 5040 seconds, 930 mkm and
778.6 mkm
We should see the data as deep as possible because
The value 4222.6 seconds is used in different ways –
o for Mercury it's used as 4222.6 hours because the different rates of time
o for Venus it's used as 2π x 670 (670 mkm = Venus Jupiter Distance)
o for Earth it's uses as a rate (5040/4222.6) to produce 930 mkm based on
778.6 mkm
It's the same data is used frequently! why??
Because there's a mechanism create each data depends on the others! Why? because
the energy source is one (4222.6 seconds) (light beam motion) and based on this
energy the data is created by one mechanism – that shows why the data is not
independent from each other- based on that we can answer why the 3 inner planets
define their orbital circumferences to be equal their distances to Jupiter (by different
ways) – Mercury Jupiter distance = mercury motion distance during its day period –
Venus Jupiter distance = Venus motion distance during its orbital period (error 1.5%)
and Earth Jupiter Distance = Earth Motion Distance during its orbital period (1.2%)
the 3 planets are connected with Jupiter by this energy (4222.6 seconds) which is
provided by light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
to disprove this explanation we have to explain all this data by another method!
The next question is
Why there's a relationship between Earth and Pluto??
It’s the light beam 1.16 mkm/sec – which is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – But how
Earth is connected with it- because Jupiter didn't send to Earth its light beam 1.16
mkm/sec?!
Let's see how that? First let's remember
Equation no. (d) (part of Equation only)
940 seconds x 2π = 5906 mkm (but 940 mkm = Earth orb. Circumfer.)…But
627 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 720 mkm (but 627 mkm =Jupiter Earth distance)
(note please – light known velocity 0.3mkm/sec needs 500 s to pass Earth orbital
distance 149.6 mkm)
seconds4222.6
seconds5040
Distance)Orbital(Jupitermkm778.6
Distance)Jupiter(Earthmkm930
=

I do this research
2nd
37
Equation no. (f)
(1)
1433 days x 0.406 mkm/day (Pluto velocity) = 580 mkm
And
365.25 days (Earth orbital period) x 0.406 mk/d = 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance)
Note Please
5906 mkm (Pluto orbital distance) = 1.16 mkm/sec x 5127 seconds
(5127 mkm = Jupiter Pluto distance)
(2)
1433 days x 4.095 mkm/day (Mercury velocity) =5848 mkm
346.6 days x4.095 mkm/day (Mercury velocity) =1433 mkm
84 days x4.095 mkm/day (Mercury velocity) =346.6 mkm
But
5040 seconds = 84 minutes which Mercury uses as 84 days to follow the previous
series reaching to the distance 5848 mkm based on the period 1433 days which is
used by Pluto (also) to produce 580 mkm
The Equations Discussion
What's the noticeable value in this data?
It's the value 500 seconds
Light with known velocity 0.3 mkm/sec needs 500 seconds to pass Earth orbital
distance
But light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec pass during 500 seconds a distance 580 mkm
This value (580 mkm) will be used again as (580 seconds) to produce 670 mkm
(Venus Jupiter distance) and this value will be used as (670 seconds) to produce 778.6
mkm (Jupiter orbital distance)
So …Earth doesn't use the light 1.16 mkm/sec but use the light 0.3mkm/sec
Pluto data (or energy) is sent to Earth in time form (500 seconds)
That's the reason of Pluto Earth relationship – and the reason of the previous data
Specially
Earth Velocity = 2π x Pluto Velocity
And also
Why Pluto moves during its day period a distance =2.58 mkm = Earth motion during
its day period = the Earth Moon Motion during a solar day period = the Earth Moon
Motion during the moon day period
Shortly
Earth, Pluto and Earth Moon data is perfectly related to each other! Why? because
Pluto is responsible for the period 500 seconds which is used by light (or Earth) to
define Earth orbital distance – means – Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm) is defined
based on the period 500 seconds which is sent from Pluto to Earth
Light beam velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is found in Earth Moon Motion – as we have seen
in equation No. III ….Let's remember it

I do this research
2nd
38
Equation No. (III)
43000 km x 27.3 days x 0.99=1.16 mkm
Equation No. (III) tells that – if the moon is a point (without diameter) and moves
from perigee to apogee every day (43000 km) – so the moon during its orbital period
will pass a distance =1.16 mkm (there's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec we will
discuss later) – here again the moon motion refers to a period 1 second of time.
Now
Why the Earth Moon Motion has a relationship with the light velocity 1.16 mkm/sec?
Because
The Earth Moon Circumference x Jupiter circumference = The Sun Diameter x The
Earth Moon Diameter = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference) = light beam (1.16
mkm/sec) motion distance during the period 4222.6 seconds…
Comments
No. (1)
All what I try to do is that
- To show that the data is created depending on each other
- To prove that, this data can't be created except if there's a light beam it's
velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
No. (2)
If we remember Equation No. 1 in this presentation
2.58 mkm = Earth Motion per a solar day
We have asked why the Equation uses Earth radius in place of Earth diameter?
Because
Earth diameter is created by 2 days of Earth motion – that supports lorentz
transformation conclusion
"Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion"
But why 2 days of Earth Motion is required to produce Earth diameter?
Because Jupiter uses energy of 2 solar days (Equation no. a in this point 3-5 Light
Velocity Limitation)
The solar system is created of one light beam (one trajectory of energy) and the data
which is defined by Jupiter should be followed by Earth – and vice versa – they aren't
separated planets from each other – they are members in one body and if the heart
pulses with 80 in a minutes Jupiter will tell this information and Earth will tell this
same information also because they are built relative and complementary to each
other.
400
RadiusEarth
mkm2.58
DistanceMoonEarth
DistanceSunEarth
DaimeterMoonThe
DaimeterSunThe
===

I do this research
2nd
39
The Rate 1.0725
Example No. 1
(1)
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
= Mars Orbital Circumference
= Pluto Neptune Distance
= Pluto eccentricity Distance
= Neptune Orbital Distance/π
= Uranus Orbital Distance /2
= Mercury Jupiter Distance x 2
(2)
Mercury Neptune Distance = Saturn Pluto Distance
Jupiter Pluto Distance = Uranus Neptune Circumference
Earth Neptune Distance = Mercury Saturn Circumference (0.5%)
(3)
Jupiter Mercury Distance = 2 Mercury Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Venus Distance = Venus Orbital Circumference (1.5%)
Jupiter Earth Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference (1.2%)
(Earth and Jupiter at 2 different sides from the sun)
(4)
Jupiter Mercury Distance = Mars Orbital Distance x π (0.6%)
Jupiter Uranus Distance = Venus Jupiter Circumference (0.8%)
Pluto Orbital Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference x 2π
Because, these distances are created by light motions – the light beam is reflected and
by that – the original light beam (a distance) = the reflected light beam (another one)
It's the most near explanation to explain this huge number of the equal distances –
Because the previous distances are more than 50% of the solar system distances total
– and it's illogical be have all these equal distances by pure coincidences
Also if the planets orbital distances depend on the masses gravity – these distances
equality forms a real puzzle because the planets masses show no similar equality!
(Please note – the planet orbital distance isn't defined based on the masses gravity
because Jupiter which is the greatest mass isn't the most near planet to the sun!)
So- Why These Distances Are Equal? –
Because –they are produced by light motions
2 light beams one is original and the other is its reflected light beam – both are equal
and has equal energy where distance = energy so the distances be equal

I do this research
2nd
40
Why These Distances Are NOT Equal?
1. 0725.1
mkm2.41nceCircumfereOrbitalMoon
mkm2.58MotionDailyEarth
=
2. 1.0725
km)(378500radiusEclipseSolarTotal
km)(406000radiusorbitalApogee
=
3. 0725.1
distanceMercuryJupitermkm720.3
DistanceOrbitalJuppitermkm6.778
= (Error 0.7%)
4. 1.0725
DistanceVenusJupitermkm670
distanceMercuryJupitermkm720.3
=
5. 1.0725
DistanceEarthJupitermkm629
DistanceVenusJupitermkm670
= (0.6%)
6. 1.0725
mkm)(1325.3DistanceVenusSarurn
mkm)(1433.5DistanceOrbitalSaturn
= (0.8%)
7. 1.0725
mkm)(1205.6DistanceMarsSarurn
mkm)(1284DistanceEarthSaturn
= (0.7%)
8. 1.0725
mkm)(2644DistanceMarsUranus
mkm)(2872.5DistanceOrbitalUranus
= (0.7%)
9. 1.0725
mkm)(4495.1DistanceOrbitalNeptune
mkm)(4894nceCircumfereOrbitalJupiter
= (1.5 %)
(10) The Planets Axial Tilts Also Use This Same Rate!
If the rate 1.0725 is produced by Lorentz length contraction effect – so the previous
data can be explained – Where the distances are equal (in previous point) because
these distances are light beams and their reflected light beams
And now
Why the distances are NOT equal?
Because these distances are light beams and their reflected light beams (as the
previous equal distances)
But
0725.1
T.AxailEarth23.4
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailNeptune28.3
===

I do this research
2nd
41
The reflected light beams pass through another frame – and because of that – these
distances specifically suffered from Lorentz length contraction effect and because of
that all these distances are contracted by the same rate 1.0725
Of course – we have to agree that "Space = Energy" – this concept is necessary for
the explanation – and we can imagine that – the light motion creates the distance –
that means – the light provides the required energy to create the required distance –
based on that we can accept that "Space = Energy".
Please see Equation No. 10
"Neptune Axial Tilt" is the parent of this equation – the value 28.3 is contracted by
the rate 1.0725 and produced 26.7 (Saturn axial tilt) which will be contracted also by
the same rate to produce 25.2 (Mars axial tilt) which will be contracted also to
produce 23.4 (Earth Axial Tilt) – the order also is logical because Neptune is the
energy source of the inner planets–this idea we discussed in (Jupiter Energy Analysis)
Also we accept that 1 mkm = 1 degree because Mercury orbital circumference =360
mkm = 360 degrees and the solar system is one machine i.e. any planet can use this
rate.

I do this research
2nd
42
3-6 Earth Moon Motion Geometrical Effects Analysis
The Earth Moon Orbit data shows a richness of geometrical effects and puzzles which
can't be created by the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Here I add some interesting geometrical features to support the reason for which the
research hypothesis was be suggested.
Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
Figure No.1 (Note Please – FDBR is a square)
Figure shows the moon orbit around Earth with some details (my created figure)
Where…… AB= BC= 86000 km….. and BR=CR also AD=BD
EB =363000 km = Perigee radius (perigee is the nearest point, the moon can reach)
EC= 378000 km= Earth Moon Distance when the moon in total solar eclipse point
EG= 384000 km = The Moon Orbital Distance (registered in NASA Planetary sheet)
ED= 406000 km = Apogee radius (Apogee is the most far point, the moon can reach)
I-Data
(EB)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (EC)2
(error 1%)
(EC)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (EG)2
(error 0.5%)
(EG)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (S)2
(where S= 394000 km- unknown point)
(S)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (ED)2
(error 0.7%)
But
(ED) = 1.0725 x (EC) also (ED) x2π = 1.0725 x(EG) x2π
II- More Data
AC = 120536 km = Saturn Diameter
EC = 378000 km = Saturn Circumference
AE= 449378.3 km = Jupiter Circumference
Triangle Angles
E Angle = 13.33 degrees C= 121.7 degrees
A Angle =45 degrees (ABC is an Equilateral triangle)
ECB Angle = 76.66 degrees BCA Angle = 45 degrees
BDC Angle =63.4 degrees ADC = 116.6 degrees
DCB Angle = 26.6 degrees GCB = 13.7 degrees

I do this research
2nd
43
III- More Data
Let's remember this data for better vision
A- Earth Moon Distance At Perigee Radius (363000 Km) = The Outer Planets
Diameters Total (Error 1%)
B- Earth Moon Distance At Apogees Radius (406000 Km) = The Solar Planets
Diameters Total
C- The Distance between Apogee and Perigee radius (space only without the
moon diameter which moves from perigee to apogee) = the inner planets
diameters total = Earth Circumference
IV- More Data
(1)
2 Jupiter Circumferences - 2 Saturn Circumferences = 1 Jupiter Diameter (error 1.3%)
(2)
(Jupiter Diameter)2
+ (Saturn Diameter)2
= (0.5 Saturn Circumference)2
(1.2%)
(3)
2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total
(4)
Saturn Diameter – Jupiter Radius = Neptune Diameter x 0.99 (No Error)
Table No. 2 Why Earth Circumference = 40080 km?
If Earth diameter = 12756 km, is considered to be = 1
Earth Circumference = 40080 km, will be just =Π So….. The Following
Vales Are Correct
Error
Earth Circumference =Π -
Solar Inner Planets Diameters Total =Π -
Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total =9Π -
Moon Orbit Radius (At Perigee Point) =9Π -
All Solar Planets Diameters Total =10Π 1%
Moon Orbit Radius (At Apogee Point) =10Π 1.2%
2 Jupiter Diameter + Saturn Diameter =10Π
Moon Orbit Radius (At Total Solar eclipse Point) =9.5Π -
Saturn Circumference =9.5Π -
II-Discussion
The previous data is so rich and can't to be discussed here – only I wish to refer one
point only in following….
As we see in the triangle…. The moon 4 main radiuses (perigee – apogee …etc) are
defined based on each other using Pythagoras rule
Regardless the question why! we need here to see some more deep point
That these 4 radiuses values which created by Pythagoras rule - these same radiuses
are created from each other by the rate 1.0725 which is found by lorentz length
contraction effect! What does that mean?
The relativistic effects are seen hiding behind some geometrical rules and because of
that we can't see these relativistic effects in the solar system motion easily- instead we
need to analyze the data to reach to this conclusion.

I do this research
2nd
44
Appendix No.1 (The using of the rate 99% in the solar system Geometry)
I- Data
(1)
17.4 degrees (the inner planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 17.2 degrees (Pluto
orbital inclination)
23.6 degrees (the outer planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 23.4 degrees (Earth
Axial Tilt)
((180 degrees /2π)= 28.66 degrees x 0.99 = 28.3 degrees (Neptune Axial Tilt)
(2)
43000 km x 27.3 days x 0.99 = 1.16 mkm (this equation is explained in page 24)
(3)
Perigee radius 363000 km = the outer planets diameters total x 0.99
(4)
Masses total of Mercury + Venus + Moon + Mars = Earth Mass x 0.99
(note Earth circumference = 5 inner planets diameters total)
II-Discussion
The previous data is an example of many similar where the rate 0.99 is used
frequently as a rate between different planets data – and the question is that Why This
Rate 0.99 Is Used So Frequently In Different Data (axial tilts – orbital
inclinations…etc)? The answer is told by Einstein himself – let's read it:
Book / Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Einstein book)
Section 13 (in Fizu experiment which is repeated frequently by others)
"According to recent and most excellent measurements by Zeeman, the influence of
the velocity of flow v on the propagation of light is represented by formula(B)(x'=wt')
to within one percent (1%)
I claim that, the difference 1% is found in the solar planets data by light motion as in
Fizu experiment measurements- someone will refuse, claiming that we have no Fizu
experiment here – no light beam –no tube and no liquid-
Shortly
It's a property of light motion – and as in Fizu experiment there was a reason to find
this percentages 1% and 99%- this same geometrical reason can be found in the solar
planets data and motions to use frequently the rates 99% or 1% which we have seen
before.
i.e.
the rate 0.99 is another proof for the light motion effect on the solar system geometry
Please Note
The contraction rate 7.1 based on which the rate 1.0725 is produced by the following:
1.07251
100
7.1
=+
This rate 7.1 as length contraction can be produced only be a velocity =0.99 of light
velocity (300000 km/sec x 0.99 = 270000km/sec).

I do this research
2nd
45
Appendix No.2
The Solar Planets Diameters are created relative one each which disproves the
random creation concept
I-Data
Table No.3 No Error More Than 1.5%
Relationship Rate
Earth Diameter / Venus Diameter =
= Mars Diameter / Earth Radius
A
Mars Diameter / Venus Radius =
= Venus Diameter / Moon Circumference=
= Moon Radius * Π/ Mercury Diameter =
= Pluto Circumference / Mars Diameter=
=Uranus Circumference / Jupiter Diameter =
= lunar apogee radius /lunar perigee radius =
A2
Pluto Circumference / Earth Radius =
=Mercury Circumference / Earth Diameter =
= Earth Diameter / Moon Circumference=
= Uranus Radius / Mars Circumference =
= Jupiter Diameter / Saturn Diameter=
= Saturn diameter / Uranus Diameter=
A3
Venus Radius / Mercury Diameter=
= Uranus Diameter / Earth Circumference=
A4
Uranus Diameter / Venus Circumference= A5
Jupiter Radius / Uranus Diameter=
= Mercury Diameter / Moon Diameter
=Mars Diameter / Mercury Diameter=
A6
II-Discussion
By explosion the random process will create the planets diameters relative to each
other as this table show – is it possible?!
NOT – It's impossible clearly
So the total solar eclipse which is found because we see the sun disc = the moon disc
was not the only miracle in the solar system – the sun diameter is created relative to
the moon diameter! This miracles repeated simply with all planets diameters as we
see - The creation force of the solar planets is a geometrical force and created each
planet based on geometrical rule and for geometrical job –
Please review, The Solar System Geometry (Part 3) https://vixra.org/abs/1705.0029

I do this research
2nd
46
References
Matter Origin and Creation
https://www.academia.edu/43214351/Matter_Origin_and_Creation
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43197587/Is_Saturn_The_Last_Planet_Created_In_The_Solar_S
ystem_II_
Is There A Parallel Universe (I)
https://www.academia.edu/43150627/Is_There_A_Parallel_Universe
"Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?"
https://www.academia.edu/43133509/Can_The_Gravity_Forces_Create_The_Moon_Orbit
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Research presentation (more discussion)

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Research presentation (more discussion)

More from Gerges francis

Recently uploaded

Research presentation (more discussion)