Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byRajiv Jhangiani
Camp Open (2017 Academic Technology Institute) #UNSHshare
This document provides information about open educational practices and resources. It discusses how the rising cost of textbooks and tuition has made higher education inaccessible for many students. Open educational resources (OER) are presented as an alternative that can help reduce costs while maintaining or improving educational outcomes. The document outlines several OER initiatives and provides data showing the cost savings and performance benefits they have achieved. It argues that open pedagogy using OER can enhance learning through practices like collaboration, peer review, and communicating to broad audiences.
More Related Content
Similar to Camp Open (2017 Academic Technology Institute) #UNSHshare
Camp Open (2017 Academic Technology Institute) #UNSHshare
- 1. OPEN EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES @thatpsychprof ServingSOCIAL JUSTICE & PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATION through University Teaching Fellow, Kwantlen Polytechnic University Senior Open Education Advocacy & Research Fellow, BCcampus Associate Editor, Psychology Learning and Teaching Rajiv Jhangiani, Ph.D.
- 3. “higher education shall beequally accessible to all”
- 4. 2.4 million low &moderate-income college-qualified high school graduates could not complete college (2001-10) The Advisory Committee on StudentFinancial Assistance http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529499.pdf
- 5. http://www.sheeo.org $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 $11,000 $12,000 1990 1992 19941996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 US Higher Education Funding -‐ $/FTE State Funding Tuition Revenue
- 6. $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 $11,000 $12,000 1990 1992 19941996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 New Hampshire Education Funding -‐ $/FTE State Funding Tuition Revenue http://www.sheeo.org
- 7. 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 1960 1965 19701975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Hours @ Minimum Wage Hours of Work Required to Afford Tuition (University of Minnesota)
- 8. In-‐State Tuition & Fees Required Hours of Work at Minimum Wage Plymouth State $13,128 1,811 Keene State $13,868 1,913 Granite State $8,265 1,140 University of New Hampshire $18,067 2,492
- 10.
- 21. What can YOU do? • Survey your student body • #textbookbroke campaign • Presentations • Utilize visuals, create displays • Speak directly to faculty & admin • Suggest that faculty review a textbook • Showcase examples • Form a student-led OER group • Connect. Collaborate.
- 22. Buy used (ifpossible) Resell (if possible) Buy online Rent Shared purchase (Inter)library loans Photocopy International edition Old edition
- 23. – University ofMinnesota student “I figured French hadn't changed that much”
- 27. 66.5% Do not purchase a req'd textbook 47.6% Take fewer courses 45.5% Do not register for a specific course 37.6% Earn a poor grade 26.1% Drop a course 19.8% Fail a course €€€ €€€ €€ €€ € € Florida Virtual Campus. (2016). 2016 student textbook and course materials survey. Tallahassee, FL: Author.
- 28.
- 31. An approach that preys on our most vulnerable constituents is not innovative. It is exploitative.
- 32.
- 34. Source: Creative Commons, 2015 State of the Commons report
- 35.
- 36.
- 37.
- 38.
- 39.
- 40.
- 41.
- 42. Not just freeor low-cost textbooks Not just digital textbooks
- 44.
- 45.
- 49.
- 50. Source: Creative Commons, 2015 State of the Commons report
- 51. Jennifer Purrenhage NR 435: Contemporary Conservation Issues Cost of commercial textbook: $155.20 Enrolment: 272 students Total student savings: $42,214 Performance gain: 72.64% to 81.72% Jesse Stabile Morrell NUTR 400: Nutrition Health & Well Being Cost of commercial textbook: $105.75 Enrolment: 441 students Total student savings: $46,635 Performance gain: 77% to 82.49%
- 52.
- 54. "Opening the Curriculum: Open Education Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2014"by I. Elaine Allen & Jeff Seaman, Babson Survey Research Group is licensed under CC BY 4.0 80% 75%
- 55. Below average 3% Average 20% Above average 34% Excellent 43% HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUALITY OF YOUR OPEN TEXTBOOK? Strongly agree 6% Slightly agree 12% Neither 17% Slightly disagree 15% Strongly disagree 50% WOULD YOU HAVE PREFERRED A TRADITIONAL TEXTBOOK? Jhangiani & Jhangiani (2017)
- 57. I would not have bought the text book for this course because it's an elective. I would have possibly walked away with a C, now I might actually get an A-‐ It is easily accessible and convenient. Material is easy to understand and follow I personally really like the convenience of having the complete set of chapters on my computer and even accessible from my phone if I need it. I like that I don't have to lug around another text book It's free and it's a great money saver
- 58. 13 Peer Reviewed Studies of Efficacy http://openedgroup.org/
- 59.
- 60. 95% Same or Better Outcomes http://openedgroup.org/ openedgroup.org/review
- 61. “Mad” “Glad” “Sad” “Rad” Cost Completing with C or Better Student Success per Dollar 0 100% $400
- 62. “Mad” “Glad” “Sad” “Rad” Cost Completing with C or Better Commercial Student Success per Dollar 0 100% $400
- 63. “Mad” “Glad” “Sad” “Rad” Cost Completing with C or Better Commercial OER Student Success per Dollar 0 100% $400
- 64. Fischer et al. (2015) • Quasi-‐experimental design • Propensity-‐score matched groups • 16,727 students taking 15 courses at 10 institutions • OER students: • Lower withdrawal rates • More likely to pass with a C-‐ or better • Higher course grades • Enrolled in more courses (current & subsequent semesters) Fischer, L., Hilton, J., Robinson T. J., & Wiley, D. (2015). A multi-‐institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-‐secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159-‐172. doi:10.1007/s12528-‐015-‐9101-‐x
- 65. Commercial vs. OER Hilton et al. (2016)
- 66. Cost savings Access Outcomes Adapt, update, & remix Enrolment Persistence Completion
- 68. "Recycling Water Bottles"by Mr.TinDC is licensed under CC BY-‐ND 2.0
- 71. Open Pedagogy: HOW Deeper learning(Farzan & Kraut, 2013) Evaluate and defend credibility of sources (Marentette, 2014) Write more concisely and think more critically (Farzan & Kraut, 2013) Collaborate with students from around the world(Karney, 2012) Provide and receive constructive feedback(Ibrahim, 2012) Enhance digital literacy (Silton, 2012) Communicate ideas to a general audience (APS, 2013)
- 74. 22,000 37,000+ 97% Students who have taken on Wikipedia assignments since 2010 New articles that students have created Instructors who say they will, or plan to, teach with Wikipedia again
- 76.
- 80. Why have students answer questions when they can write them?
- 81.
- 82. "GB Airways A320"byTony Evans is licensed under CC BY-‐ND 2.0
- 83. "IMG_1007"by Erica is licensed under CC BY 2.0
- 88.
- 89.