Bracing elements in structural system plays a vital role in the seismic behaviour of high rise buildings during earthquake. Many of the structural failures in buildings during strong earthquake shaking have indicated that sustainable strength and stable energy dissipation capability are most desirable to maintain inter story drifts and overall structural displacements within tolerable levels. So earthquake action brings a greater concern in the structural design of buildings which is situated in earthquake prone areas. Steel bracing are the common type which mainly used to resist the lateral loads acting during a seismic activity. Conventional types of lateral load resisting systems are concentrically-braced frames (CBFs) and eccentrically braced frames (EBF). Buckling Restrained Braces (BRB) are recent developed structural system which has a stable energy dissipation property. Main advantage of BRB is its ability to yield both in tension and compression without buckling, thus obtaining a stable hysteresis loop. The BRB brace placed in a concentric frame is termed as BRBF system.
2. INTRODUCTION
The brace which attempts to inhibit buckling under
compression is called Buckling Restrained Brace
Allow the building to withstand cyclical lateral
loadings, typically earthquake-induced loading
Ability to yield both in tension and compression
without buckling
6/21/2018 2
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
3. CBF
• Connection
failure
• Member fracture
• Loss of strength
and stiffness
SCBF
• Degradation of
brace capacity
and stiffness
• Brace fracture
• Undesirable
system response
BRBF
6/21/2018 3
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
NEED FOR A BETTER BRACE
4. FUNDAMENTALS OF BRB BEHAVIOUR
6/21/2018 4
Fig. 1 Behaviour of Brace [4]
Concentric brace
Buckling
restrained
brace
Yielding
brace
Buckling
brace
BRB yielding
in both
tension and
compression
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
5. 6/21/2018 5
Fig. 2. Hysteresis plot for buckling-restrained brace and
concentric brace [4]
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
15. • Lateral deflection of frame for a specific horizontal load is much less in
buckling restrained frame as compared to conventional braced frame, using
the same cross section of a brace.
• The average ratio of lateral displacement of conventional braced frame to
buckling restrained braced frame is 1.215. This shows BRB is more
effective in resisting the lateral deflection.
• The average ratio of lateral load caring capacity of conventional braced
frame to buckling restrained braced frame for a specified lateral deflection
is 1.33. This shows the lateral load caring capacity of BRB is more than
conventional brace.
6/21/2018 15
RESULT
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
16. ADVANTAGES
Stable hysteretic behaviour and high energy dissipation
capacity
It can be easily connected to the structural system
Limited sensitivity to environmental condition changes
It yields in both tension and compression
The BRB element can if necessary be replaced after a
major seismic event.
6/21/2018 16
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
17. Depending on the configuration used, BRBF’s can give
lower foundation loads than comparable shear wall
systems
It is easy to adopt in seismic retrofitting
Does not usually require structural members and
foundation strengthening
6/21/2018 17
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
18. DISADVANTAGES
Lack of re-centering mechanism
Lack of criteria for detecting and checking damaged
braces
Ductility properties strongly affected by the geometry
and material type of the yielding steel core segment
Further studies regarding the reliability of brace
connections to the frame are required
6/21/2018 18
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
19. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
Enhanced Seismic Stability and Residual Drift Control
Fig. 4. BRBF – SMRF [6] Fig. 5. BRBF - Elastic Truss
[6]
6/21/2018 19
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
20. Novel BRB Configurations
Fig. 6. Interior vertically oriented
BRBs at the base of frame [6]
Fig. 7. Exterior outrigger BRB [6]
6/21/2018 20
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
21. APPLICATIONS
Osaka International Convention Centre, Japan
Casad Dam, US
Wallace F. Bennet Federal Building, Utah
One Rincon Hill Tower, San Francisco
6/21/2018 21
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
22. CONCLUSION
Behaves more effectively, when it is subjected to a
seismic force
Provides the cost effective solution in lateral load
resisting system as compared to conventional brace
BRB use the inherent ductility of steel to provide system
ductility
6/21/2018 22
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
23. REFERENCES
Bhargava Laxmi Goli et al. (2017), “ Analytical Study of Buckling Restrained
Frames Under Lateral Loads Using ETABS”, International Journal of Pure
and Applied Mechanics, 15, 431-435
Gary S. Prinz & Paul W. Richards (2012), “Seismic Performance of Buckling-
Restrained Braced Frames with Eccentric Configurations”, American Society of
Civil Engineers, 138, 345-353
Kumbhar Y D & Dr. Shiyekar M R (2014), “ Study of Buckling Restrained
Braces in Steel Frame Building”, International Journal of Engineering
Research and Applications, 4(8), 71-74
Nayana Surendran & Asha Varma P (2017), “Buckling Restrained Braces
(BRB) – A Review”, International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology, 4(3), 2320-2324
6/21/2018 23
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering
24. Frames”, Modern Steel Construction
Reza Bagerzadeh Karimi M et al. (2015), “Seismic Behavior of Steel Structure
with Buckling Restrained Braces”, International Journal of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, 9, 503-511
Robinson K S (2014), “Advances in design requirements for Buckling
Restrained Braced frames”, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
Conference
Ryan A. Kersting & Larry A. Fahnestock, Walterio A. López (2015), “Seismic
Design of Steel Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames”, National Institute of
Standards and Technology
Yamini Komath & Preethi M (2017), “Review On Structural Performance Of
Braced Steel Sturtures Under Dynamic Loading”, International Research
Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(6), 1535-1539
6/21/2018 24
BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
Department of Civil Engineering