Download to read offline
Uploaded byPooja Rani
braden scale.pptx fuundamental braden scale
The Braden and Norton scales are tools developed to assess the risk of pressure ulcer development, with scores indicating varying levels of risk. The Braden scale has six factors with scores from 6-23, while the Norton scale evaluates five factors with scores from 5-20, both using lower scores to denote higher risk. A case study of an 87-year-old patient highlights the application of these scales, revealing significant concerns regarding her health and risk of pressure ulcers.
More Related Content
Similar to braden scale.pptx fuundamental braden scale
braden scale.pptx fuundamental braden scale
- 1.
- 2. Introduction Developed 1984by Braden and Bergstrom. The scale consists of six subscales and the total scores range from 6-23. A lower Braden score indicates higher levels of risk for pressure ulcer development.
- 3. Six Parameters 1. Sensoryperception 2. Moisture 3. Activity 4. Mobility 5. Nutrition 6. Friction and shear
- 4. Instructions for Scoring Complete the form by scoring each item from 1-4 (1 for low level of functioning and 4 for highest level of functioning) for the first five risk factors and 1-3 for the last risk factor. The lower the score, the greater the risk. 19-23 = No risk 15-18 = Mild Risk 13-14 = Moderate Risk 10-12 = High Risk 9 or less =Very High Risk
- 5. Example of BradenScale Sensory Percepti on Moisture Activity Mobility Nutrition Friction and Shear No Impair ment 4 Rarely Moist 4 Walks Frequen tly 4 No Limitati ons 4 Excellen t 4 Slightly Limited 3 Occasion ally Moist 3 Walks Occasio naly 3 Slightly Limited 3 Adequat e 3 No Appare nt Proble m 3 Very Limited 2 Very Moist 2 Chair bound 2 Very Limited 2 Probabl y Inadequ ate 2 Potenti al Proble m 2 Compl etely Limited 1 Constant ly Moist 1 Bedbou nd 1 Comple tely Immobi le 1 Very Poor 1 Proble m 1
- 6. 1. Sensory Perception Abilityto respond meaningfu lly to pressure- related discomfort 1.Completely Limited Unresponsive (does not respond to painful stimuli) Limited ability to feel pain over most of body surface. 2.Very Limited Responds only to painful stimuli. Cannot communicate discomfort except by moaning or restlessness 3.Slightly Limited Responds to verbal commands, but cannot always communicate discomfort Some sensory impairment which limits ability to feel pain or discomfort in 1 or 2 extremities 4.No Impairment Responds to verbal commands. Has no sensory deficit which would limit ability to feel pain or discomfort.
- 7. 2. Moisture Degree to whichskin is exposed to moisture 1.Constantly Moist Skin is kept moist almost constantly by perspiration, urine, etc. 2.Very Moist Skin is moist often, but not always. Linen change approxim ately each shift 3.Occasionally Moist Skin is occasionally moist, requiring an extra linen change approximately once a day. 4.Rarely Moist Skin is usually dry. Linen only requires changing at routine intervals.
- 8. 3. Activity Degree of physical activity 1.Bedfast Confined to bed. 2.Chairfast Ability to walk very limited or non-existent. Cannot bear own weight and must be assisted into chair or wheelchair. 3.Walks Occasionally Walks occasionally during day, but for very short distances. Spends majority of each shift in bed or chair. 4.Walks Frequently Walks outside the room at least twice a day and inside room at least once every 2 hours during waking hours.
- 9. 4. Mobility Ability to change and control body position 1.Completely Immobile Doesnot make even slight changes in body or extremity position without assistance. 2. Very Limited Makes occasional slight changes in body or extremity position but unable to make frequent changes independently 3.Slightly Limited Makes frequent slight changes in body or extremity position independen tly. 4.No Limitations Makes major and frequent changes in position without assistance
- 10. 5. Nutrition Usual food intake pattern 1. VeryPoor Never eats a complete meal. Eats 2 servings or less of protein per day. Takes fluids poorly. Does not take a dietary supplement. Receives clear liquids or IVs for more than 5 days. 2.Probably Inadequate Rarely eats a complete meal Eats only 3 servings of protein per day. Occasionally take a dietary supplement. Receives less than optimum amount of liquid diet or tube feeding. 3. Adequate Eats over half of most meals. Eats a total of 4 servings of protein each day. Usually take a supplement if offered. Receives tube feeding or TPN regimen which probably meets most of nutritional needs. 4. Excellent Eats most of every meal. Never refuses a meal. Usually eats a total of 4 or more servings of protein per day. Does not require supplementa tion.
- 11. 6. Friction andShear Friction and Shear 1. Problem Requires moderate to maximum assistance in moving. Complete lifting without sliding against sheets is impossible. 2. Potential Problem Movement requires minimum assistance. During a move, skin probably slides to some extent against sheet Maintains good position in chair or bed most of the time, but occasionally slides down. 3.No apparent problem Moves in bed and in chair independently and has sufficient muscle strength to lift up completely during move. Maintains good position in bed or chair at all times.
- 12.
- 13. INTRODUTION The NortonScale was developed in the 1960s and is widely used to assess the risk for pressure ulcer in older patients. The five subscale scores of the Norton Scale are added together for a total score that ranges from 5-20. A lower Norton score indicates higher levels of risk for pressure ulcer development. Generally, a score of 14 or less indicates at-risk status.
- 14. Five Parameters 1. Physicalcondition 2. Mental condition 3. Activity 4. Mobility 5. Incontinence
- 15. Instructions for Scoring Complete the form by scoring each item from 1-4. The lower the score, the greater the risk. >18 = Low risk 14-18 = Medium Risk 10-14 = High Risk <10 =Very High Risk
- 16. Example of NortanScale Physical Condition Mental Condition Activity Mobility Incontinence Good 1 Alert 1 Ambulant 1 Full 1 None 1 Fair 2 Apathetic 2 Walks with help 2 Slightly impaired 2 Occasional 2 Poor 3 Confused 3 Chair bound 3 Very limited 3 Usually urinary 3 Very Bad 4 Stuporous 4 Bedfast 4 Immobile 4 Urinary and Fecal 4
- 17. CASE STUDY Sincyis a 87 year old lady who is admitted to hospital after a fall at home . She has broken her right neck of femur. She is found in a very unkempt state she was very thin and was suffering from dehydration she had very red heels which did blanch ,but her sacrum was also pink and non blanching. After an skin examination she was found to have a moisture lesion on her buttocks and smelt of urine on admission . On admission she was difficult to wake and only responded to painful stimuli . What is her risk score ?