BOBLME Marine Protected Area Working Group Meeting telah dilaksanakan di Penang, Malaysia pada tanggal 11-12 Februari 2014. Pertemuan dihadiri oleh perwakilan dari delapan negara, yaitu Indonesia, Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, Maladewa, Myanmar, Sri Langka dan Tahiland. Delri dalam pertemuan tersebut terdiri dari perwakilan Direktorat Konservasi Kawasan dan Jenis Ikan dan Direktorat sumberdaya Ikan, Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. Tujuan pelaksanaan dari pertemuan ini adalah : (1) Melakukan updating dan validasi data dan informasi Kawasan Konservasi Perairan (KKP) yang berada di wilayah BOBLME; (2) Menyelesaikan ringkasan kebijakan (Policy Brief) Kawasan Konservasi Perairan di setiap negara anggota BOBLME; (3) Membahas, Mengembangkan dan merekomendasikan program berkelanjutan dan arah kebijkan pengelolaan KKP untuk perikanan dan konservasi keanekaraman hayati baik dari negara maupun perspektif lintas batas; (4) Melaporkan pelaksanaan kegiatatan BOBLME terkait manajemen efektivitas kawasan konservasi perairan. Pertemuan BOBLME Marine Protected Area Working Group Meeting dibuka oleh Dr. Sarah Park, Discipline Director of NRM, Worldfish. Mr Ku Kassim Bin Yaacob, FRI Penang, DOF dan Mr. Abd. Munthalib Juli, DMP, MoNRE, Putrajaya. Adapun Fasilitator dalam pertemuan ini adalah Dr. Kuperam Viswanathan, Universiti Utrara Malaysia. Hasil dari pertemuan tersebut diantaranya : 1. Berdasarkan dari data yang di sampaikan oleh BOBLME melalui wordfish bahwa terdapat 15 KKP Indonesia berada di kawasan BOBLME telah di update dan di validasi menjadi 19 KKP dengan total luasan 7.267 KM2 2. Kedelapan negara anggota BOBLME telah menyelesaikan dan melaporkan draft akhir ringkasan kebijakan (Policy Brief) Kawasan Konservasi Perairan 3. Indonesia melaporkan pelaksanaan proyek BOBLME manajemen efektivitas kawasan konservasi perairan di KKPD Pulau Weh Sabang dan TWP Pulau Pieh. 4. Kedelapan anggota BOBLME sepakat untuk memperpanjang proyek BOBLME Marine Protected Area 5. Indonesia mengusulkan 19 KKP yang terdapat dalam kawasan BOBLME masuk kedalam proyek manajemen efektivitas kawasan konservasi perairan BOBLME Marine Protected Area 6. Indonesia mengusukan adanya manajeman plan bersama terkait pengelolaan KKP di kawasan BOBLME 7. Pihak BOBLME mengusulkan proyek transbondary MPA dengan pilot negara Indonesia, Malaysia dan Thailand. Pertemuan di tutup oleh Dr. Rudolf Hermes selaku Chief Technical Advisor BOBLME. Dalam sambutannya disampaikan ucapan terimakasih kepada semua perserta yang menghadiri dan berperan aktif pada pertemuan ini, sehingga output yang diharapakan dalam pertemuan BOBLME Marine Protected Area Working Group terpenuhi.

1. Assessment and Planning of Effective Management of two MPAs in Sumatra Coast:
Sabang District MPA and Pulau Pieh National Marine Recreation Park
Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries
Directorate General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands
Government of the Republic of Indonesia
Indonesia’s Marine Protected Area
Management Effectiveness within BOBLME
BOBLME MPA-WG Meeting – Penang, 11-12 February 2014

2. Background
• > 95,186 km coastline (globally 2nd longest)
• ± 17,504 islands
• 5.8 million square km EEZ (3x land area)
• Includes 37% of world’s total fish species
• Global center of marine biodiversity (e.g. > 70 genera of hard corals)
• 18% of world’s coral reefs and largest exporter of marine ornamentals in the world

3. • Law No 5/1990 on Conservation of Natural Resources and its
Ecosystem
• Law No 31/2004 Jo Law No 45/2009 on Fisheries Management
• Law No 32/2004 on Regional Autonomy
• Law No 32/2009 on Environmental Management and Protection
• Law No 27/2007 on Integrated Coastal Zone and Small Island
Management  Law No. 1/2014
• Government Regulation No 68/1998 on Nature Reserves and
Preservation areas
• Government Regulation No 60/2007 on Fishery Resources
Conservation
• Some relevant Ministerial Decrees on MPA establishment and
management
Per.17/Men/2008  MPA in Coastal and Small islands
Per.02/Men/2009 MPA Designation Mechanism
Per.30/Men/2010  Zoning and Management Plan
Kep.44/KP3K/2012  E-KKP3K
Kep.02/KP3K/2013  Boundary
Marking of MPA

4.  MPA initiative
 National MPA
 District-based MPA
 MPA zoning system
 Core Zone
 Sustainable Fisheries
Zone
 Utilization zone
 Other zones
to support sustainable
fisheries
to decentralize marine
resources management
to protect marine
biodiversity
to support sustainable
tourism
to support other
purposes 4

5. “…degree to which management of a MPA has had a
positive impact on the area’s biophysical resources and on
the socio-economic and cultural aspects of the local
community, which contribute to improving management
performance”
TargetYear 2014 2020 2030
MMAF
Strategic Plan
Government
Commitment
CBD
Commitment
Size 15.5 Mio Ha
~ 5% of water
territory
20 Mio Ha
~ 6.5% of water
territory
10% of water
territory
~ 31 Mio Ha
Effective
Management
4.5 Mio Ha 7 Mio Ha 10 Mio Ha
…to meet management objectives

6. INDONESIA MARINE PROTECTED AREAS

7. INDONESIA MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
No Conservation Areas Number of Area Area (Ha)
A Initiated by MOF 32 4,694,947.55
- Marine National Parks 7 4,043,541.30
- Marine Nature Recreation Parks 14 491,248.00
- Wildlife Reserves 5 5,678.25
- Marine Nature Preserves 6 154,480.00
B Initiated by Local
Governments and MMAF
99 11,069,263,30
- Marine National Park 1 3,521,130.01
- Marine Nature Reserve 3 445,630.00
- MarineRecreation Park 6 1,541,040,20
- District Marine Protected Area 89 5,561,463,09
Total 131 15,764,210.85
Source: MMAF, Dec 2013
Mid. Dev. Target (RPJM II): 15.5 Millions Ha by 2014; 20 Million Ha by 2020

8. INDONESIA MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
WITHIN BOBLME AREAS
Marine Protected Areas
Bengkalis
Aceh Besar
Aceh Jaya
Agam
Padang City

9. INDONESIA MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
WITHIN BOBLME
No Site Name Longitude Latitude
National
Designation
International
Status
Established
Total Area
(km2)
IUCN
Category
Habitat Types Has Polygon
1Batang Gasan 99.97 -0.46 District Marine
Conservation Area
2010 68.4 √
2Jorong Maligi 99.57 0.06 Local/District
Marine Protected
Area (KKLD)
2007 0.1 VI Mangrove habitat√
3Kepulauan Banyak 97.30 2.11 Marine Nature
Recreational Park
1996 2275 V mangrove √
4Kepulauan Mentawai 99.33 -1.87 Local/District
Marine Protected
Area (KKLD)
2006/2012 1721.9 VI Coral reefs and
mangrove habitat
√
5Nias 97.25 1.48 Local/District
Marine Protected
Area (KKLD)
2007 290 coral reefs,
mangrove habitat
√
6Nias Selatan 98.23 -0.05 Local/District
Marine Protected
Area (KKLD)
2008 560 Tourism, fishery,
coral reefs,
mangrove habitat
√
7Pulau Penyu (Pesisir
Selatan) District Marine
Conservation Area
100.54 -1.55 District Marine
Conservation Area
2003 7.33 V √
8Pulau Pieh 100.14 -0.95 Marine Recreation
Park
2000 399 V Pieh Island,
adjacent reefs.
Coral reefs,
ornamental fish,
nyph swamp
area, wetland
√
9Pulau Pinang, Siumat and
Simanaha (Pisisi)
96.33 2.62 Local/District
Marine Protected
Area (KKLD)
2006 500 VI Coral reefs,
mangroves,
ornamental fish,
protected fish
species
√
10Pulau Pini Games Reserve 98.79 0.13 Game Reserve 1996 83.5 VI √
PA ?

10. INDONESIA MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
WITHIN BOBLME
No Site Name Longitude Latitude National Designation
International
Status
Established
Total Area
(km2)
IUCN
Category
Habitat Types Has Polygon
11Pulau Ujung, Pulau Tangah,
Pulau Angso and Pulau Kasiak
100.08 -0.59 Local/District Marine
Protected Area
(KKLD)
2006/2010 115.25 VI Coral reefs, marine
biota, turtle species
√
12Pulau Weh Sabang 95.24 5.89 Nature Recreation
Park
1982 39 V Mangrove, coral
reef, ornamental
fish, protected fish
species
√
13Sabang 95.30 5.83 Local/District Marine
Protected Area
(KKLD)
2010 32 VI √
14Serdang Bedagai 99.50 3.77 Local/District Marine
Protected Area
(KKLD)
2008 12.4 Coral reefs, turtle
species
√
15Tapanuli Tengah 98.63 1.63 Local/District Marine
Protected Area
(KKLD)
2007 812.43 Tourism, fishery,
coral reefs,
mangrove habitat
√
16Aceh Besar Local/District Marine
Protected Area
(KKLD)
2010 1.75 VI -
17Aceh Jaya Local/District Marine
Protected Area
(KKLD)
2010 2.00 VI √
18Bengkalis Local/District Marine
Protected Area
(KKLD)
2010 407.418 I Terubuk: Tenualosa
macrura (toli
shad/hilsa))
v
19Agam Local/District Marine
Protected Area
(KKLD)
2012 0.1 VI -
20Kota Padang Local/District Marine
Protected Area
(KKLD)
2011 18 VI v
TOTAL MPA AREA : 7,351 KM2 735,100 Hectares Kep. 59/Men/2011

11. Terubuk (Tenuolasa Macrura) Open-Close System
• August – Nov (13,14,15 and 16 Hijr calendar)
• August – Nov (28,29,30 and 1 Hijr calendar)
CLOSED
Kep. 59/Men/2011

12. MPA Management Effectiveness

13. Anugerah E-KKP3K (E-MPA Awards) 2013:
 Favourite (1) and Learning (5) Awards: Sabang,
Sukabumi, Batang, Alor, Klungkung, Raja Ampat
 Aceleration Awards: 17 District MPA 13

14. TATA-KELOLA
(GOVERNANCE)
BIOFISIK
(BIOPHYSICAL)
SOSIO-EKONOMI
(SOCIO-ECONOMIC)
FUNCTION FUNCTION
Basic principles of e-MPA
(effective MPA ~ EKKP3K)
Adaptivemgt
Scope: Macro and Micro
Main refs: Hockings et al. 2000, 2006; Pomeroy et al. 2004; Staub &
Hatziolos 2004; White et al. 2006; Carter et al. 2010; Min. Reg. 02/2009;
Min. Reg. 30/2010; Min. Reg. 17/2008

15. EVALUATION EFFECTIVENESS OF
MARINE PROTECTED AREA
MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA
No. Criteria
16 Impact MPA mgt for community welfare
17 Sustainable Financing
MPA SUSTAIN
(SELF-RELIANT)
(5)
MPA Optimally
Managed
(4)
MPA
Managed @
Minimum
(3)
MPA
Established
(2)
MPA
Initiated
(1)
1 Initiative proposal
2 Identification and inventarisation
3 Area designation
4 Management unit and staff
5 Management plan and zoning development
6 Infrastructures development
7 Budget allocation for management
8 Legalization of management plan and zoning
9 SOPs for management developed
10 Mgt operation based on mgt plan and zoning
11 MPA enactment by Minister
12 MPA boundaries marking
13 Institutionalization
14 Ecosystem and resources management
15 Socio economic and culture mgt
(8)
(11)
(21)
(28)
(6)
(74)

16. Building block of e-MPA
16
Level
3. Green
2. Yellow
5. Gold
4. Blue
1. Red
1-3 years?
3-5 years?
5-7 years?
7-10 years?
>10 years?
IMPROVEMANAGEMENTEFFECTIVENESS
Suraji et al., 2012

17. Pilot Sites for the Sustainable Fisheries
Management of the BOBLME Project
Sabang District MPA and Pulau Pieh National Marine Recreation Park

18. • To document management status of Pulau
Pieh NMRP and Sabang District MPA.
• To measure management effectiveness level
as a basis for improving management of these
MPAs over time.
• Providing scientific information for adaptive
management in the future.
Objective

19. Sabang District MPA

20. Profile
• The east coast of Weh Island (Sabang) has relatively
higher marine biodiversity, live coral cover, and reef
fisheries resources compared to other areas adjacent
to the island (WCS, 2007).
• Strong understanding and supports from local
community to marine conservation has led to
establishment of Sabang District MPA,

21. Sabang District MPA
• Sabang District MPA was reserved in 2010 by the Decree of
Mayor of Sabang City No. 729/2010
• The total area of the MPA is 3,207.98 Hectares, comprises of:
– Core Zones (65.06 Hectares),
– Limited Utilization Zone (113.42 Hectares), and
– Sustainable Fisheries Zone (3,029.50 Hectares).
• MPA management body was formed and legalized by the
Head of District Marine Affairs and Fisheries Office Decree No.
538/10/2012
• Designated, Enacted by Minister of marine Affairs and
Fisheries 57/Kepmen-KP/2013, dated on 18 December 2013

22. Sabang MPA Zoning Plan

23. Ecological Conditions
HardCoralCover%
Live coral cover from 2009 to 2011 by management type in Weh Island (Muttaqin et al. 2011)
Management Type 2009 2010 2011
Sabang MPA 58.8 58,0 44.9
Iboih Recreation Park 40.2 38.7 34.6
Open access 42.5 47.3 46.1

24. • Natural factors causing damage to coral reefs include tsunami
in 2004 and coral bleaching event in 2010
• Human activities inflicting damage include coastal
development and the use of environmentally destructive
fishing activities, such as Japanese trawl, purse seine, and
cyanide.
• high demand and consumption for reef fish in Weh Island has
been causing high pressure toward reef fish populations
• increasing number of fishing fleets was also other factor that
could potentially lead to over-exploitation to the reef fish
resources.
• Increasing visitations of tourists to east coast of Weh Island,
The quality of the beaches has been decreased due to
presence of unmanaged garbage
Issues on Sabang District MPA Management

25. ASSESSMENT PROCESS:
SABANG District MPA
Workshop to assess management effectiveness of Sabang District MPA was held in capital of
Aceh Province, Banda Aceh, on 12-13 June 2013
1
2 The workshop 30 participants and 6 facilitators attended the workshop

26. Assessment results of management effectiveness of
Sabang District MPA
Ranking No. of Question No. of YES answer Percentage
Red 8 8 100%
Yellow 11 11 100%
Green 21 11 52%
Blue 28 4 14%
Gold 6 0 0%
Status E-KKP3K:
YELLOW
Green 52%

27. Recomendation
• The management unit should improve the capacity of
management functions, in this case surveillance, resource
monitoring, and socio-economic and cultural monitoring.
• The management unit should develop Standard Operational
Procedure (SOP) for office administration and financial
management.
• The management unit should develop SOP for minimum facility
and infrastructure.
• The management unit should develop SOP for and implementation
of institutional strengthening, join patrol, resource management,
and socio-economic and cultural strengthening.
To improve management effectiveness level of Sabang District MPA towards 100% of
GREEN level, the following are recommended

28. Pulau Pieh National Marine Recreation Park

29. Pulau Pieh NRMP
• Pulau Pieh NMRP is located in West Sumatra Province
and under jurisdiction of three districts, i.e. Padang City,
Pariaman City, and Padang Pariaman District
• The Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries designated
Pulau Pieh and the surrounding areas as National Marine
Recreation Park through Decree No. KEP.70/MEN/2009.
• The Recreation Park, which covers an area of 39,900
Hectares, is home of various protected species such as
turtles, sharks, whales, dolphins, and giant clam.

30. Pulau Pieh NMRP Zoning Plan

31. Ecological Conditions
Location
Live coral cover Category
2010 2011 2010 2011
Pulau Bando 43,45% 48,1 % Damage Damage
Pulau Pieh 22,48% 31,2 % Severely Damage Damage
Pulau Pandan 19,23% 26,8 % Severely Damage Damage
Pulau Air 16,66% 26,0 % Severely Damage Damage
Pulau Toran 18,59% 28,0 % Severely Damage Damage

32. Issues of Pulau Pieh NMRP management
There are several major issues that influence effective management of Pulau Pieh
NMRP.
• Coral reef degradation
• Exploitation of protected marine species
• Conversion of island’s habitats
• Natural disaster
• Beach erosion
• Infrastructure limitation for MPA management
• Community awareness

33. ASSESSMENT PROCESS:
PULAU PIEH National Marine Recreation Park
Workshop to assess management effectiveness of Pulau Pieh NMRP was held in Padang,
the capital of West Sumatra Province, on 15-16 July 2013.
1
2 The workshop was attended by 28 participants and 5 facilitators

34. Assessment results of management effectiveness of
Pulau Pieh National Marine Recreation Park
Ranking No. of
Question
No. of YES
answer
Percentage
Red 8 8 100%
Yellow 11 11 100%
Green 21 12 43%
Blue 28 4 8%
Gold 6 0 0%
Status E-KKP3K:
YELLOW
Green 43%

35. Recomendation
• The management unit should achieve adequate number and
qualifications of MPA managers
• The management unit should meet adequate facilities and
infrastructure to support MPA management
• The management unit should legalize the management and
zoning plan document.
• The management unit should prepare for Standard
Operational Procedure (SOP) for office operational and MPA
management
• The management unit should execute the management and
zoning plans
To improve management effectiveness level of Pulau Pieh NMRP District MPA
towards 100% of green level, the following are recommended

36. NEXT CHALLENGES
• Strenghtening Management Unit of MPAs
• Developing Zoning and Management Plan of MPAs
• Conduct Monitoring of Ecology, Econimic and Sosio-cultural
• Support policies and guideline to improve management of MPAs
• Ensure benefit of MPAs on Fisheries and Tourism
• Collaborative Management
• Community Empowerment
• MPA Networks
• Sustainable financing schemes to suport management of MPAs
• Conservation management for Charismatic Species,
endangered and endemic aquatic species
• Evaluation of MPA Management Effectiveness to All MPA Within BOBLME
• Pilot of Collaborative and MPA Networks Management for BOBLME

37. THANKYOU