Sources Solving Business Problems do good
        ofSourSnnovation: Where
             ideas come from?
             Professor Ed Barrows
                Babson College

                     April 13th , 2011
                  For more information:
                  ebarrows@babson.edu




            2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Goal for Today




Improve your ability
 to solve problems




2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
“Let’s Work the Problem”



The fact is every organization
faces problems—some more
challenging than others. But a
cool head and a structured
approach will do a lot more for us
than simply engaging in
guesswork.




                   2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Agenda

    •     Problem solving versus decision-making
    •     Discussion questions
    •     Data on decision-making
    •     Basic definitions
    •     Common Biases
    •     Two critical processes
    •     Problem solving process
            –     Step 1:     Define the problem / Exercise
            –     Step 2:     Identify potential causes / Exercise
            –     Step 3:     Analyze potential causes
            –     Step 4:     Draw conclusion
            –     Step 5:     Implement and revise

NOTE: This presentation was developed from Professor Gaurab Bhardwaj’s Presentation, Question-Driven Problem Solving, August, 2009, Babson College.
                                                                                                                                                      4
                                                  2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Some perspective on decision-making
       and problem solving




                                                             5
    2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Discussion Questions


1. Are decision-making and problem-solving the same things?
   If not, what’s the difference?



2. Can you make decisions without solving problems and vice
   versa?




                                                                            6
                   2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Some data to provide context

    Economist Intelligence Unit/Business Objects Survey of
    Executive Decision Making (2007)
    • Poor data leads to poor decisions;
    • As organizations grow, decision-making becomes more
      challenging;
    • Decision support tools need to be easier to use;
    • Decisions today may involve too much art and not enough science.
            – 55% of respondents noted that decision processes are largely
              informal.
            – 77% of respondents said decisions made by senior management were
              either “sometimes” or “frequently” wrong.


Source: Economist Intelligence Unit, In Search of Clarity-Unraveling the Complexities of Executive Decision-Making, EIU Report, 2007.
                                                                                                                                        7
                                                 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Some more data to provide context

    Bain survey of 760 companies from across all industries with
    revenues over $1 billion (2008):

    • Companies in the sample that were most effective at decision-
      making and execution generated average total shareholder returns
      almost six percentage points higher than those of other firms.

    • They also found that the average organization they examined had
      the potential to “more than double its decision effectiveness.”




Source: Blenko, Mankins, and Rogers, The Decision-Driven Organization, Harvard Business Review, June 2010
                                                                                                            8
                                               2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Basic Definitions

     • Problem: Perceived gap between the existing state and a desired
       state, or a deviation from a norm, standard, or status quo.
           Although most problems turn out to have several solutions (the
           means to close the gap or correct the deviation), challenges arise where
           such means are either not obvious or are not immediately available.


     • Decision: Choice made between alternative courses of action in a
       situation of uncertainty. Although too much uncertainty is
           undesirable, manageable uncertainty provides the freedom to make
           creative decisions.

            A problem solving process should help us identify the sources of the gap.
              A decision-making process should help us choose among alternative
                                       courses of action.
Source: www.businessdictionary.com
                                                                                              9
                                     2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Common biases limit our ability to
                    solve problems and make decisions
         Bias                                               Description
Availability Bias     Too much importance is placed on information or data that is recent
                      or available.
Anchoring Bias        The scope or extent of the analysis is limited by the starting point.


Commitment Bias       Adherence to a previous decision increases despite the knowledge
                      of information contrary to the prior decision
Confirmation Bias     The solution has been decided or is known before any data is
                      collected or analysis is completed.
Hindsight Bias        The belief that the occurrence of an event or outcome was caused
                      by a previous action that in fact had little to do with the outcome.
Overconfidence Bias   The practice of being overly optimistic often time is the face of data
                      to the contrary.
Representative Bias   The practice of assessing the likelihood of an event or outcome by
                      drawing parallels to other events or outcomes that are unrelated.
                                                                                               10
                         2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Other Challenges…


• Framing: When decisions are presented as gains instead of
  losses evidence shows people make different decisions.

• Plunging-In: People tend to dive into problem solving (gathering
  information, reaching conclusions) without determining whether
  or not they are solving the right problem or following a proper
  process.




                This last point we are concerned with today

                                                                              11
                     2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
There are two basic processes

Problem-Solving Process                                      Decision-Making Process




         Our focus will be the problem solving process

                                                                                       12
                2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Why Bother to Use A Process?


• Improves the quality of problem solving/decision making by
  teams and individuals.
• Makes business problems—which often seem intractable—
  tractable by applying structured, logical thinking.
• While there is not always ‘one right answer’, there are often
  several bad answers. Using a process helps eliminate the latter.
• Helps improve communication, teamwork and team processes.




                                                                              13
                     2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Step 1: Define the Problem


                                  • This is the most important step in the
                                    process because it drives the analysis.
                                  • Deal with facts, what is known to be
                                    true about the problem you are dealing
                 1                  with. Challenge assumptions.
Define Problem
                                  • Separate symptoms from the actual
                                    problem(s).
                                  • Develop a main question. Questions
                                    are the most useful way to structure
                                    problems.


                                                                              14
                     2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Defining the Problem with the SCQ
                        Framework
SITUATION
• Where are you now vs. where you want to be?
• What makes the situation unsatisfactory? Why is there a need for
change?


COMPLICATION
• What is stopping you from getting to where you want to be?
• Consider the hurdles, constraints, and trade-offs


QUESTION
• What is the one main question you need to answer?
   o The question should be analytical and action-oriented
   o It should be a problem, not a symptom
   o It should be more important and urgent than other questions
   o Frame the question such that it is answerable with a ‘yes’ or ‘no’
                2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved    15
Framing Questions

         • Questions should be phrased clearly and precisely
         • Use full but succinct sentences
         • Do not use compound questions; avoid the word “and” in
         a question
         • If possible, phrase questions so that they have a “yes” or
         a “no” answer…

               Not…                                                                 But…

What level of inventory do I need?                                Are my inventories too high?

What should I do about my loan to Co. A?                          Should I continue lending to Co. A?

                           2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved                16
Why Use Yes/No Questions?


• It forces you to analyze both possibilities rather than making an
implicit “yes” choice by framing a question as “how”

• Yes/no questions tend to be more specific, forcing a boundary
around the question, making the problem more tractable

• They prevent prior hypothesis or confirmation bias;

• Yes/No questions are balanced and thus help prevent decision-
making biases due to framing.


                     2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved   17
Blank SCQ Framework

Problem Name:
Situation (current):                                   Situation (desired):
•                                                      •
•                                                      •
•                                                      •
•                                                      •
•                                                      •
Complication (barriers):
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Main Question:                                                            Conclusions/Recommendations
•                                                                         •
                                                                          •
                                                                          •

                                                                                                    18
                           2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
“Failure is Not an Option”




                          Having a clear definition of the
                          problem will help us ensure that
                          failure isn’t one of our options.




   2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Step 2: Identify Potential Causes


                                • We want to take our main question
                                  and identify more specific questions.
                                • Each of these questions can be further
                                  broken down into more granular
    Identify
               2                  questions. These questions can then
Potential Causes                  be analyzed.
                                • A mutually exclusive, collectively
                                  exhaustive (MECE) approach should be
                                  used for completeness purposes.




                                                                            20
                   2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Analyzing the Problem with an Issue
                                  Tree

• An issue tree is a hierarchy of questions and sub-questions that
helps identify the data and analyses necessary to answer the main
question. The questions are inter-connected logically.


• Starting with the main question identified using SCQ, every
question is decomposed into a set of sub-questions, ideally with a
yes/no answer.


• Continue decomposing questions into sub-questions until the final
set of sub-questions can be answered with data.
                                                                              21
                     2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Issue                                   Issue Tree Example
                                                  Revenue                     Total market size?
                                                  potential?
                     Will 1st
                     time buyers                                              Our likely market share?
                     be
                     profitable?
                                                                              Incremental sales and
                                                                              marketing costs?
                                                  Costs to serve?
Should we pursue
the 1st time buyer
  market in PCs?                                                              Incremental operating
                                                                              costs?

                                                  Aligned with brand
                                                  image?                      Differentiates us in
                     Is a 1st time                                            the marketplace?
                     buyer
                     strategy
                                                           Keeps us
                     aligned
                                                           competitive?
                     with our
                     corporate                                                Brings us to parity with
                     strategy?                                                competitors?
                                                  Matches our target
                                                  segments?                                              22
                     2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Issue Trees Can Be Rather
                                         Comprehensive




Source: www.deloitte.com

      4/17/2011            2010, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved   23
Issues and Sub-Issues

To develop sub-issues from an issue, you could think in terms of:

1. what ‘whole’ does the issue represent and so what would be its
   ‘parts’ or sub-issues?
2. an effect (issue) and its causes (sub-issues)
3. an action (issue) and its benefits and risks (sub-issues)
4. frameworks and formulas that can be used to analyze the issue
5. factors that drive the issue you are analyzing


    Because an issue can be decomposed in many ways, try a
    few before settling on the one that best meets your needs

                                                                               24
                      2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Three Rules for Building and Issues
                                   Tree

1. All sub-questions grouped together at the same level contribute
   answers to the broader question one level above


2. A set of sub-questions [emanating from a single question] should
   have the same level of abstraction [e.g., revenue and cost, but not
   profit and cost, not revenue and volume] or be of the same type [e.g.,
   actions, causes, 5-Forces]


3. A set of sub-questions must be mutually exclusive and collectively
   exhaustive (MECE). (e.g. cutting a cake into smaller pieces
                                                                               25
                      2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Can This Issue Tree Be Improved?
                                                                 Low quality?
                Poor
                product                                          Not trendy enough?
                design?
                                                                 Not sleek enough?


                                                                   Lack of advertising
                                                                   dollars?
Why are new     Inadequate
                promotion?                                         Benchmark best
product sales
poor?                                                              practices?

                                                                   No buy-in by head
                Small sales                                        of marketing?
                force?

                                                                   Product came
                                                                   out late?
                Ineffective
                placement?
                                                                   Couldn’t find
                                                                   right channels?
                                                                                         26
                2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
MECE Example




Permanent members of
the UN Security Council                                                      ?


                                                                                 27
                    2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
MECE Example


                                                                  USA


                                                                  UK

Permanent members of
the UN Security Council                                           Russia


                                                                  France


                                                                  China



                                                                           28
               2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Thoughts on Applying MECE



Applying MECE does not mean that you put everything
conceivable to ensure that the branches are collectively
exhaustive. Some of the issues may be irrelevant or tangential.
Think using the idea of CE and then drop those issues
that are of little use. Or, lump them under an ‘other’ category.




                                                                            29
                   2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Blank Issue Tree

                                                                         Sub Question


                               Sub Question
                                                                         Sub Question




                                                                         Sub Question

Main Question                  Sub Question

                                                                         Sub Question




                                                                         Sub Question

                               Sub Question


                                                                         Sub Question



                                                                                        30
                2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Step 3: Analyze Potential Causes

                                • Once the questions are formulated,
                                  pick one (or more) of the subordinate
                                  questions to address.
                                • Identify a list of data sources that can
               3
                                  be used to research your question.
    Analyze
Potential Causes                • Seek secondary (i.e. published) data
                                  first. Time and cost permitting, seek
                                  primary data.
                                • Develop a work plan and assign the
                                  questions to different members of your
                                  team where possible.


                                                                            31
                   2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Data Analysis Format


      Question
                                     Analysis Required                             Data Sources

                 • Price of current products                             • Internal pricing summary
  Sub Question
Can Prices Be    • Prices of key competitors                             • Competitor pricing summary
Increased?
                 • Price increase history within                         • Industry pricing trends report
                 industry

                 • Assessment of buyer’s                                 • Review of key customer
                 willingness to accept price                             accounts
                 increases


                                                                                                    32
                        2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Step 4: Draw Conclusions

                               • After all of the primary and secondary data
                                 is collected it must be synthesized.
                               • Raw data typically comes in various forms
                                 (e.g. qualitative narratives and quantitative
                                 analytics) and must be interpreted.
              4                • Team members need to develop a common
   Draw
Conclusions
                                 point of view regarding their research
                                 findings so they should work together to
                                 synthesize the findings.
                               • A summary of the pertinent data (one
                                 document) should be developed that
                                 incorporates all of the research especially
                                 conflicting viewpoints.

                                                                            33
                  2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Drawing Conclusions Example


                                                                                     Industry
                                                                                      Pricing
Pricing Analysis Findings                                                             Report
Over the past 10 years industry prices have
increased a total of 12.3%. Increases were
most aggressive in the 2002-2004 time period .                                          Customer
Prices actually declined in briefly in 2006.                                            Account
Review of our accounts show that price                                                  Reviews
increases failed to keep pace with the industry.
Over the same time horizon, industry our prices
increase 9.8% following the identical trend of
                                                                                            Competitor
the industry. Competitors pricing power was
                                                                                             Summary
mixed…



                                                                                                         34
                            2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Step 5: Make Recommendations

                              • The data summary should be paired with
                                the question.
                              • The main question should be addressed
                                using the findings from step three.
                                NOTE: if the findings are not able to
     Make
              5                 address the question there has been an
Recommendations                 error in the data collection and collection
                                may need to be expanded.)
                              • Where gaps exist, make assumptions but
                                be sure to document them as such.
                              • Be sure that your answer to the question
                                can be substantiated using the data.

                                                                           35
                  2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Make Recommendations Example




                     Pricing Analysis Findings

                     Over the past 10 years industry prices have increased a total of 12.3%.
                     Increases were most aggressive in the 2002-2004 time period . Prices actually
                     declined in briefly in 2006. Review of our accounts show that price increases
                     failed to keep pace with the industry. Over the same time horizon, industry
                     our prices increase 9.8% following the identical trend of the industry.
                     Competitors pricing power was mixed…




                                                                                             36
2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
Next Steps

• Refine your SCQ template and your issues tree (make
  different ones)
• Develop a work plan for data collection and analysis
• Schedule time to work on this (which includes developing
  recommendations)
• Recognize this is challenging work
• Email me if you need help




4/17/2011        2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved   37

BEE Solving Problems Web

  • 1.
    Sources Solving BusinessProblems do good ofSourSnnovation: Where ideas come from? Professor Ed Barrows Babson College April 13th , 2011 For more information: ebarrows@babson.edu 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 2.
    Goal for Today Improveyour ability to solve problems 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 3.
    “Let’s Work theProblem” The fact is every organization faces problems—some more challenging than others. But a cool head and a structured approach will do a lot more for us than simply engaging in guesswork. 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 4.
    Agenda • Problem solving versus decision-making • Discussion questions • Data on decision-making • Basic definitions • Common Biases • Two critical processes • Problem solving process – Step 1: Define the problem / Exercise – Step 2: Identify potential causes / Exercise – Step 3: Analyze potential causes – Step 4: Draw conclusion – Step 5: Implement and revise NOTE: This presentation was developed from Professor Gaurab Bhardwaj’s Presentation, Question-Driven Problem Solving, August, 2009, Babson College. 4 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 5.
    Some perspective ondecision-making and problem solving 5 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 6.
    Discussion Questions 1. Aredecision-making and problem-solving the same things? If not, what’s the difference? 2. Can you make decisions without solving problems and vice versa? 6 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 7.
    Some data toprovide context Economist Intelligence Unit/Business Objects Survey of Executive Decision Making (2007) • Poor data leads to poor decisions; • As organizations grow, decision-making becomes more challenging; • Decision support tools need to be easier to use; • Decisions today may involve too much art and not enough science. – 55% of respondents noted that decision processes are largely informal. – 77% of respondents said decisions made by senior management were either “sometimes” or “frequently” wrong. Source: Economist Intelligence Unit, In Search of Clarity-Unraveling the Complexities of Executive Decision-Making, EIU Report, 2007. 7 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 8.
    Some more datato provide context Bain survey of 760 companies from across all industries with revenues over $1 billion (2008): • Companies in the sample that were most effective at decision- making and execution generated average total shareholder returns almost six percentage points higher than those of other firms. • They also found that the average organization they examined had the potential to “more than double its decision effectiveness.” Source: Blenko, Mankins, and Rogers, The Decision-Driven Organization, Harvard Business Review, June 2010 8 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 9.
    Basic Definitions • Problem: Perceived gap between the existing state and a desired state, or a deviation from a norm, standard, or status quo. Although most problems turn out to have several solutions (the means to close the gap or correct the deviation), challenges arise where such means are either not obvious or are not immediately available. • Decision: Choice made between alternative courses of action in a situation of uncertainty. Although too much uncertainty is undesirable, manageable uncertainty provides the freedom to make creative decisions. A problem solving process should help us identify the sources of the gap. A decision-making process should help us choose among alternative courses of action. Source: www.businessdictionary.com 9 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 10.
    Common biases limitour ability to solve problems and make decisions Bias Description Availability Bias Too much importance is placed on information or data that is recent or available. Anchoring Bias The scope or extent of the analysis is limited by the starting point. Commitment Bias Adherence to a previous decision increases despite the knowledge of information contrary to the prior decision Confirmation Bias The solution has been decided or is known before any data is collected or analysis is completed. Hindsight Bias The belief that the occurrence of an event or outcome was caused by a previous action that in fact had little to do with the outcome. Overconfidence Bias The practice of being overly optimistic often time is the face of data to the contrary. Representative Bias The practice of assessing the likelihood of an event or outcome by drawing parallels to other events or outcomes that are unrelated. 10 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 11.
    Other Challenges… • Framing:When decisions are presented as gains instead of losses evidence shows people make different decisions. • Plunging-In: People tend to dive into problem solving (gathering information, reaching conclusions) without determining whether or not they are solving the right problem or following a proper process. This last point we are concerned with today 11 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 12.
    There are twobasic processes Problem-Solving Process Decision-Making Process Our focus will be the problem solving process 12 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 13.
    Why Bother toUse A Process? • Improves the quality of problem solving/decision making by teams and individuals. • Makes business problems—which often seem intractable— tractable by applying structured, logical thinking. • While there is not always ‘one right answer’, there are often several bad answers. Using a process helps eliminate the latter. • Helps improve communication, teamwork and team processes. 13 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 14.
    Step 1: Definethe Problem • This is the most important step in the process because it drives the analysis. • Deal with facts, what is known to be true about the problem you are dealing 1 with. Challenge assumptions. Define Problem • Separate symptoms from the actual problem(s). • Develop a main question. Questions are the most useful way to structure problems. 14 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 15.
    Defining the Problemwith the SCQ Framework SITUATION • Where are you now vs. where you want to be? • What makes the situation unsatisfactory? Why is there a need for change? COMPLICATION • What is stopping you from getting to where you want to be? • Consider the hurdles, constraints, and trade-offs QUESTION • What is the one main question you need to answer? o The question should be analytical and action-oriented o It should be a problem, not a symptom o It should be more important and urgent than other questions o Frame the question such that it is answerable with a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved 15
  • 16.
    Framing Questions • Questions should be phrased clearly and precisely • Use full but succinct sentences • Do not use compound questions; avoid the word “and” in a question • If possible, phrase questions so that they have a “yes” or a “no” answer… Not… But… What level of inventory do I need? Are my inventories too high? What should I do about my loan to Co. A? Should I continue lending to Co. A? 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved 16
  • 17.
    Why Use Yes/NoQuestions? • It forces you to analyze both possibilities rather than making an implicit “yes” choice by framing a question as “how” • Yes/no questions tend to be more specific, forcing a boundary around the question, making the problem more tractable • They prevent prior hypothesis or confirmation bias; • Yes/No questions are balanced and thus help prevent decision- making biases due to framing. 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved 17
  • 18.
    Blank SCQ Framework ProblemName: Situation (current): Situation (desired): • • • • • • • • • • Complication (barriers): • • • • • • • Main Question: Conclusions/Recommendations • • • • 18 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 19.
    “Failure is Notan Option” Having a clear definition of the problem will help us ensure that failure isn’t one of our options. 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 20.
    Step 2: IdentifyPotential Causes • We want to take our main question and identify more specific questions. • Each of these questions can be further broken down into more granular Identify 2 questions. These questions can then Potential Causes be analyzed. • A mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive (MECE) approach should be used for completeness purposes. 20 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 21.
    Analyzing the Problemwith an Issue Tree • An issue tree is a hierarchy of questions and sub-questions that helps identify the data and analyses necessary to answer the main question. The questions are inter-connected logically. • Starting with the main question identified using SCQ, every question is decomposed into a set of sub-questions, ideally with a yes/no answer. • Continue decomposing questions into sub-questions until the final set of sub-questions can be answered with data. 21 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 22.
    Issue Issue Tree Example Revenue Total market size? potential? Will 1st time buyers Our likely market share? be profitable? Incremental sales and marketing costs? Costs to serve? Should we pursue the 1st time buyer market in PCs? Incremental operating costs? Aligned with brand image? Differentiates us in Is a 1st time the marketplace? buyer strategy Keeps us aligned competitive? with our corporate Brings us to parity with strategy? competitors? Matches our target segments? 22 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 23.
    Issue Trees CanBe Rather Comprehensive Source: www.deloitte.com 4/17/2011 2010, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved 23
  • 24.
    Issues and Sub-Issues Todevelop sub-issues from an issue, you could think in terms of: 1. what ‘whole’ does the issue represent and so what would be its ‘parts’ or sub-issues? 2. an effect (issue) and its causes (sub-issues) 3. an action (issue) and its benefits and risks (sub-issues) 4. frameworks and formulas that can be used to analyze the issue 5. factors that drive the issue you are analyzing Because an issue can be decomposed in many ways, try a few before settling on the one that best meets your needs 24 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 25.
    Three Rules forBuilding and Issues Tree 1. All sub-questions grouped together at the same level contribute answers to the broader question one level above 2. A set of sub-questions [emanating from a single question] should have the same level of abstraction [e.g., revenue and cost, but not profit and cost, not revenue and volume] or be of the same type [e.g., actions, causes, 5-Forces] 3. A set of sub-questions must be mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive (MECE). (e.g. cutting a cake into smaller pieces 25 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 26.
    Can This IssueTree Be Improved? Low quality? Poor product Not trendy enough? design? Not sleek enough? Lack of advertising dollars? Why are new Inadequate promotion? Benchmark best product sales poor? practices? No buy-in by head Small sales of marketing? force? Product came out late? Ineffective placement? Couldn’t find right channels? 26 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 27.
    MECE Example Permanent membersof the UN Security Council ? 27 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 28.
    MECE Example USA UK Permanent members of the UN Security Council Russia France China 28 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 29.
    Thoughts on ApplyingMECE Applying MECE does not mean that you put everything conceivable to ensure that the branches are collectively exhaustive. Some of the issues may be irrelevant or tangential. Think using the idea of CE and then drop those issues that are of little use. Or, lump them under an ‘other’ category. 29 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 30.
    Blank Issue Tree Sub Question Sub Question Sub Question Sub Question Main Question Sub Question Sub Question Sub Question Sub Question Sub Question 30 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 31.
    Step 3: AnalyzePotential Causes • Once the questions are formulated, pick one (or more) of the subordinate questions to address. • Identify a list of data sources that can 3 be used to research your question. Analyze Potential Causes • Seek secondary (i.e. published) data first. Time and cost permitting, seek primary data. • Develop a work plan and assign the questions to different members of your team where possible. 31 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 32.
    Data Analysis Format Question Analysis Required Data Sources • Price of current products • Internal pricing summary Sub Question Can Prices Be • Prices of key competitors • Competitor pricing summary Increased? • Price increase history within • Industry pricing trends report industry • Assessment of buyer’s • Review of key customer willingness to accept price accounts increases 32 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 33.
    Step 4: DrawConclusions • After all of the primary and secondary data is collected it must be synthesized. • Raw data typically comes in various forms (e.g. qualitative narratives and quantitative analytics) and must be interpreted. 4 • Team members need to develop a common Draw Conclusions point of view regarding their research findings so they should work together to synthesize the findings. • A summary of the pertinent data (one document) should be developed that incorporates all of the research especially conflicting viewpoints. 33 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 34.
    Drawing Conclusions Example Industry Pricing Pricing Analysis Findings Report Over the past 10 years industry prices have increased a total of 12.3%. Increases were most aggressive in the 2002-2004 time period . Customer Prices actually declined in briefly in 2006. Account Review of our accounts show that price Reviews increases failed to keep pace with the industry. Over the same time horizon, industry our prices increase 9.8% following the identical trend of Competitor the industry. Competitors pricing power was Summary mixed… 34 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 35.
    Step 5: MakeRecommendations • The data summary should be paired with the question. • The main question should be addressed using the findings from step three. NOTE: if the findings are not able to Make 5 address the question there has been an Recommendations error in the data collection and collection may need to be expanded.) • Where gaps exist, make assumptions but be sure to document them as such. • Be sure that your answer to the question can be substantiated using the data. 35 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 36.
    Make Recommendations Example Pricing Analysis Findings Over the past 10 years industry prices have increased a total of 12.3%. Increases were most aggressive in the 2002-2004 time period . Prices actually declined in briefly in 2006. Review of our accounts show that price increases failed to keep pace with the industry. Over the same time horizon, industry our prices increase 9.8% following the identical trend of the industry. Competitors pricing power was mixed… 36 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved
  • 37.
    Next Steps • Refineyour SCQ template and your issues tree (make different ones) • Develop a work plan for data collection and analysis • Schedule time to work on this (which includes developing recommendations) • Recognize this is challenging work • Email me if you need help 4/17/2011 2011, Babson Executive Education - All Rights Reserved 37