AUDIENCE FEEDBACK
By Kate Wiselka
WHY WE WANTED AUDIENCE
FEEDBACK
After asking a sample of our primary and secondary
audience questions regarding our opening sequence, we
were able to learn what our audience enjoyed about the
sequence and also the things that they feel could have
been improved upon
We chose a sample size of each audience that would allow
us to be sure we were getting an accurate idea of the
feedback from each audience
Sample Size
Primary Audience 11
Secondary Audience 10
QUESTIONS ASKED FOR
FEEDBACK
Did you enjoy the opening sequence? Why?
Do you feel intrigued to watch the whole film? Why?
What did you think of our choice of protagonist? Could you
connect with her? Could you tell she was introverted?
What did you think of the use of coloured light?
What was your opinion of the font we used for our opening
credits?
WHAT WAS LEARNT
All of the people asked said they enjoyed watching the
opening sequence as although it did not reveal much about
the narrative, it left them intrigued and wanting to discover
more about the protagonist and her story.
Along with this, all of the audience members asked said
they would want to watch the whole film if it were to be
produced; they felt that the narrative had potential to keep
them interested.
WHAT WAS LEARNT
Many of the people questioned felt that the protagonist
was played well and the actress fitted the role; also, they
felt that they could connect with her as she seemed
‘ordinary’.
They also felt that she was introduced well and her
introverted nature was present, particularly through her
facial expressions - clearly showing that she was lonely -
and also through the shots where she receives the text from
her mum.
WHAT WAS LEARNT
In general, the audience felt that the use of coloured light
in the film was naturalistic and appeared to fit in with the
character’s emotions. Many also said they felt it was a
gradual and therefore natural change of light as the colours
were not overpowering.
However, some, mainly from our secondary audience
category, argued that the yellow lighting in the shed was
perhaps a bit unnatural as it seemed to be a much more
vivid yellow than perhaps sunlight is.
WHAT WAS LEARNT
The font type of our production got mixed reviews; some
audience members felt that the font did not feel suitable for
the type of production we made - with it being a social
realism for sophisticated audience members, however
other’s felt that it fitted well with the narrative and themes of
art in the production.
WHAT WE WOULD IMPROVE OR
CHANGE, BASED ON OUR
FEEDBACK
If we were to make this opening sequence again, we would definitely take into
account what the audience are saying. We would perhaps consider taking more
time into making sure that our lighting was as absolute and realistic as possible
along with ensuring that the colours appear natural.
Also, we would look at ensuring that all of our shots are as well done as possible as
a few audience members picked up on slightly shaky camera movements. We
would try to use the best equipment available to try to correct this and take extra
time to make sure the camera is as stable as possible. There are also other shots
we may consider using such as a macro shot of dust landing; this would make our
production more cinematic and artistic.
Finally, we would take a lot longer looking at and deciding font types. Although we
felt that we had chosen an appropriate font, as did many of our audience members,
there may be a font that both suits the social realism genre as well as fits our
narrative. It is possible that we may look to change this to satisfy all our audience.
OUR CHOICE OF AUDIENCE
I feel that we chose the correct audience for our production
and therefore, based on the feedback they have given,
would not change them.
All members of the sample asked said that they enjoyed the
sequence and would want to watch the whole film if it was
to be produced, therefore, we know that there was interest
from these audiences.
Furthermore, due to our film being independent, the
audience is educated and sophisticated and therefore the
independent nature is appealing to them.

Audience Feedback

  • 1.
  • 2.
    WHY WE WANTEDAUDIENCE FEEDBACK After asking a sample of our primary and secondary audience questions regarding our opening sequence, we were able to learn what our audience enjoyed about the sequence and also the things that they feel could have been improved upon We chose a sample size of each audience that would allow us to be sure we were getting an accurate idea of the feedback from each audience Sample Size Primary Audience 11 Secondary Audience 10
  • 3.
    QUESTIONS ASKED FOR FEEDBACK Didyou enjoy the opening sequence? Why? Do you feel intrigued to watch the whole film? Why? What did you think of our choice of protagonist? Could you connect with her? Could you tell she was introverted? What did you think of the use of coloured light? What was your opinion of the font we used for our opening credits?
  • 4.
    WHAT WAS LEARNT Allof the people asked said they enjoyed watching the opening sequence as although it did not reveal much about the narrative, it left them intrigued and wanting to discover more about the protagonist and her story. Along with this, all of the audience members asked said they would want to watch the whole film if it were to be produced; they felt that the narrative had potential to keep them interested.
  • 5.
    WHAT WAS LEARNT Manyof the people questioned felt that the protagonist was played well and the actress fitted the role; also, they felt that they could connect with her as she seemed ‘ordinary’. They also felt that she was introduced well and her introverted nature was present, particularly through her facial expressions - clearly showing that she was lonely - and also through the shots where she receives the text from her mum.
  • 6.
    WHAT WAS LEARNT Ingeneral, the audience felt that the use of coloured light in the film was naturalistic and appeared to fit in with the character’s emotions. Many also said they felt it was a gradual and therefore natural change of light as the colours were not overpowering. However, some, mainly from our secondary audience category, argued that the yellow lighting in the shed was perhaps a bit unnatural as it seemed to be a much more vivid yellow than perhaps sunlight is.
  • 7.
    WHAT WAS LEARNT Thefont type of our production got mixed reviews; some audience members felt that the font did not feel suitable for the type of production we made - with it being a social realism for sophisticated audience members, however other’s felt that it fitted well with the narrative and themes of art in the production.
  • 8.
    WHAT WE WOULDIMPROVE OR CHANGE, BASED ON OUR FEEDBACK If we were to make this opening sequence again, we would definitely take into account what the audience are saying. We would perhaps consider taking more time into making sure that our lighting was as absolute and realistic as possible along with ensuring that the colours appear natural. Also, we would look at ensuring that all of our shots are as well done as possible as a few audience members picked up on slightly shaky camera movements. We would try to use the best equipment available to try to correct this and take extra time to make sure the camera is as stable as possible. There are also other shots we may consider using such as a macro shot of dust landing; this would make our production more cinematic and artistic. Finally, we would take a lot longer looking at and deciding font types. Although we felt that we had chosen an appropriate font, as did many of our audience members, there may be a font that both suits the social realism genre as well as fits our narrative. It is possible that we may look to change this to satisfy all our audience.
  • 9.
    OUR CHOICE OFAUDIENCE I feel that we chose the correct audience for our production and therefore, based on the feedback they have given, would not change them. All members of the sample asked said that they enjoyed the sequence and would want to watch the whole film if it was to be produced, therefore, we know that there was interest from these audiences. Furthermore, due to our film being independent, the audience is educated and sophisticated and therefore the independent nature is appealing to them.