The document summarizes audience feedback from a survey about music video products. 20 people responded to the survey, providing feedback on aspects like scene, clothing, story, editing, genre, and lighting. Respondents rated lip syncing the lowest and said it needed most improvement. The survey also showed that ancillary products like the CD cover and advert successfully represented the artist and encouraged people to watch the music video and promote the artist. The music video received over 1,000 views and positive comments on YouTube and social media, though one comment noted issues with lip syncing.

1. Audience feedback

2. Surveys
We made a survey
on survey
monkey to try
and get more
audience
feedback on the
products that we
have produced.
We made a short
survey with 10
questions and
received
feedback from 20
people.

3. Answers given in survey

4. This answer showed that there were several things that the audience liked:
The scene, clothing, story and editing. Which shows that the mis en scene
of the music video was good.

5. The answers that we got from this question strongly suggest that we managed
to target the products that we made at a specific genre: Pop and sub-genre
electro pop. The is also shows that we managed to relate the products back to
the genre that we wanted to and allowed the target audience to regoconise the
conventions that we placed in the products.

6. This showed that the worst quality that we had in our music video was the lip
syncing as we were rated the lowest with a score of 4 out of 10. Also some
target audiences felt that the lighting and editing techniques worked quite well
in the music video as they rated us a 10 for those aspects.

7. The thing that we found out from this is that the aspect that needed to be
improved was the lip syncing and the girls dancing. I now realise that different
shots of the girls such as tracking and more close up shots which would have
made it better. Also I have learnt that it is really important for the lip syncing to
be right because otherwise the whole video quality is brought down and
therefore to improve this we should have asked the artist to say the lyrics out
loud instead of miming them so that it would have looked better.

8. The CD cover and the advert have been successful at representing the artist
which has been said my many of the target audience. This means that the
ancillary products have worked well in synergy with the music video to promote
the artist ‘Conor Maynard’. The reason for this was due to the flow between the
products and the theme in each to combine the products together.

9. 100% of the people that have answered this question said that the ancillary
products encourage them to watch the music video and then be more viable
to buy the single and then promoting the artist as well. This means that the
products that we created were successful in doing their job which was to
encourage more people to listen to Conor Maynards music and watch his
video and promote the artist.

10. Feedback from other sites
We posted our music video up on YouTube and managed
to receive over 1000 views altogether and 16 likes. All
the people that commented also said they liked the video
too

11. Social network feedback
I posted the music video on my
Facebook and allowed people
to give feed back on the music
video. We managed to get 7
likes and 3 comments.
One of the people that
commented said that the lip
syncing was bad, however the
rest of the video was good.
Another person also compared
the artist Conor Maynard with
Justin beiber and said it was
better than his video’s which is
a good achievement.