Analysis of the video audience
           feedback
T he first targ et audience

vGood: Variety of shots and it goes well together
vRepresentation: Hint of a ladies man but likes the girls and respects them giving
   him a good image.
vImprovements: Lip syncing, the video quality
vLighting: 8 location: 9 props: 7 lip sync: 4
From this I have learnt that the shots that we used were pretty good but the quality
of the vide and the lip syncing wasn’t. Therefore we should have paid more
attention to it. However the artist was represented well as this is what we wanted the
artist to come off as; a ladies man but humble.
T he second targ et audience

vGood: snappy fast cuts were good as it represented the artist well
vRepresentation: gets girls but is sweet
vImprovements: Expression of the artist, lip syncing, make artist look at
    camera more
vLighting: 7 location: 8 props: 8
From this response we gathered that the shots were good as it represented the artists image;
youthful and therefore energetic. However the expression of the artist and the lip syncing was the
worst part.
T he third targ et audience

vGood: The text that was added, the visuals matched the lyrics
vRepresentation: he was wearing casual and fashionable clothing which shows he is a
    youth
vImprovements: Lip sync
vLighting: 8 location: 7 props: 10 lip sync: 5
Overall the information that we gathered from this target audience was that the visuals
matched the lyrics therefore we paid attention to the lyrics and tried to match it to the
visuals and also the text that was added was good. However the lip syncing again was
poor and got poor marks for that. The representation of the artist was spot on as this Is
what we wanted the artist to come off as: youthful and fashionable .
Group audience feedback

vGood: the acting of the artist
vImprovements: Lip syncing and quality of the video
vLighting: 6 location: 4 props: 6 lip syncing: 3
The audience also said that we could have had the artist say the words out loud to make it
look natural which would improve the quality of the video. But the acting of the artist
was good.
Overall…

What would we have done differently:
vWe should have had the artist sing the song out loud to improve the lip syncing
vHad more camera movement
vImprove the quality of the shots
vMade sure the girls that were dancing were doing it properly and we should have
   had a camera going around them to make it look more like a party
vHad the artist mime less of the song and had more of the party scene
Overall…

What would we have done differently:
vWe should have had the artist sing the song out loud to improve the lip syncing
vHad more camera movement
vImprove the quality of the shots
vMade sure the girls that were dancing were doing it properly and we should have
   had a camera going around them to make it look more like a party
vHad the artist mime less of the song and had more of the party scene

Analysis of the video audience feedback

  • 1.
    Analysis of thevideo audience feedback
  • 2.
    T he firsttarg et audience vGood: Variety of shots and it goes well together vRepresentation: Hint of a ladies man but likes the girls and respects them giving him a good image. vImprovements: Lip syncing, the video quality vLighting: 8 location: 9 props: 7 lip sync: 4 From this I have learnt that the shots that we used were pretty good but the quality of the vide and the lip syncing wasn’t. Therefore we should have paid more attention to it. However the artist was represented well as this is what we wanted the artist to come off as; a ladies man but humble.
  • 3.
    T he secondtarg et audience vGood: snappy fast cuts were good as it represented the artist well vRepresentation: gets girls but is sweet vImprovements: Expression of the artist, lip syncing, make artist look at camera more vLighting: 7 location: 8 props: 8 From this response we gathered that the shots were good as it represented the artists image; youthful and therefore energetic. However the expression of the artist and the lip syncing was the worst part.
  • 4.
    T he thirdtarg et audience vGood: The text that was added, the visuals matched the lyrics vRepresentation: he was wearing casual and fashionable clothing which shows he is a youth vImprovements: Lip sync vLighting: 8 location: 7 props: 10 lip sync: 5 Overall the information that we gathered from this target audience was that the visuals matched the lyrics therefore we paid attention to the lyrics and tried to match it to the visuals and also the text that was added was good. However the lip syncing again was poor and got poor marks for that. The representation of the artist was spot on as this Is what we wanted the artist to come off as: youthful and fashionable .
  • 5.
    Group audience feedback vGood:the acting of the artist vImprovements: Lip syncing and quality of the video vLighting: 6 location: 4 props: 6 lip syncing: 3 The audience also said that we could have had the artist say the words out loud to make it look natural which would improve the quality of the video. But the acting of the artist was good.
  • 6.
    Overall… What would wehave done differently: vWe should have had the artist sing the song out loud to improve the lip syncing vHad more camera movement vImprove the quality of the shots vMade sure the girls that were dancing were doing it properly and we should have had a camera going around them to make it look more like a party vHad the artist mime less of the song and had more of the party scene
  • 7.
    Overall… What would wehave done differently: vWe should have had the artist sing the song out loud to improve the lip syncing vHad more camera movement vImprove the quality of the shots vMade sure the girls that were dancing were doing it properly and we should have had a camera going around them to make it look more like a party vHad the artist mime less of the song and had more of the party scene