A PowerPoint Presentation of the excellent book of Arun Shourie by the same name in which he discloses the story of how India academia was taken over by the Leftist establishment during the tenure of Indira Gandhi as the Prime Minister of India. She authorized the Communization of Indian academia under the Education Ministry of Dr. Nurul Hasan who was a card-carrying cadre of the Communist Party. Here is a short presentation of the eye opening book.

1. Eminent Historians
Their Technology, Their Line, Their
Fraud
PRESENTATION
BASED ON A BOOK BY
ARUN SHORIE

2. During the British
rule of
India, History
taught in schools
was specially
doctored to deprive
the „natives‟ of the
knowledge of their
own heritage and
culture, and on the
other hand to
inculcate
admiration of their
rulers.

3. Arun Shourie‟s
„Eminent
Historians‟, informs
the reader that this
dangerous trend in
the writing of
Indian History is
still rampant.
Arun Shourie

4. History must not be made a tool for
serving political or other ends

5. Marxist historians have been suppressing facts
and inventing lies by seizing control of
institutions such as the Indian Council of
Historical Research (ICHR), the
National Council of Educational
Research Training (NCERT), large parts of
Indian academia, and nearly all of the
English-media newspapers and publishing
houses.

6. Marxist historians and the corruption by them
Scholars Project Status of project
K. Rajayan Before 1857 Submitted but not traceable
S.R. melhotra 1857-1885 Not submitted
Bipin Chandra 1885-1886, 1932-1934 Not submitted
B.R. Grover 1899-1902 Submitted and published
Sumit Sarkar 1905-1907, 1907-1909 Not submitted
M.N. Das 1920-1915 Not submitted
T.K. Ravindran 1915-1919 Not submitted
V.N. Dutta 1919-1920 Submitted and published
Sita Ram Singh 1920-1922 Submitted and published
Amba prasad 1924-1926 Not submitted
Bimal Prasad 1927-1929, 1930-1931 Not submitted
Gopal Krishna 1934-1937 Not submitted

7. Included as principals in this group of Marxist
historians are Romila Thapar, Satish
Chandra, K.M. Shrimali, K.M.Pannikar, R.S.
Sharma, D. N. Jha, Gyanendra Pandey, and
Irfan Habib.

8. The Islamic conquest of India is probably
the bloodiest story in history.

9. Marxist party line is to project Hindus as
exploitative feudalists and Muslims as
liberators!

10. Book: Bharat Katha, prepared by the Burdwan Education Society,
Teachers Enterprise, published by Sukhomoy Das.
Page 113: “According to Islamic law non-Muslims
will have to choose between death and Islam. Only
the Hanafis allow non-Muslims to pay jaziya in
exchange for their lives.”
After Edition:By paying jaziya to Alauddin khaliji,
Hindus could lead normal lives.”

11. Page 89: “sultan mahmud used force for widespread
murder, loot, destruction and conversion.”
After Edition: “There was widespread loot and
destruction by Mahmud.”
No reference to killing, No reference
to forcible conversions.

12. How the Buddhist priesthood perished by the
swords of the Muslim invaders has been
recorded by Muslim historians themselves.
Still Marxist historians are suppressing this
fact.

13. Sultan Mahmud
bin Ibrahim
Sharqi( AD
1440-1457):
in Tabkat-i-
akbari
“After sometime he
proceeded to Orissa
with the intension of
jihad. He attacked
places in the
neighborhood of that
province and laid
them waste, and
destroyed the
temples after
demolishing them…”

14. Sultan Sikandar
Lodi at
Mathura(UP):
In abu’llah’s
Tarikh-i-Da’udi
“He was so zealous a
Musalman that he
utterly destroyed
diverse places of
worship of the
infidels, and left not
a vestige remaining
of them. He entirely
ruined the shrines of
Mathura…”

15. 25 May 1679:
Auragzeb’s reign
“Khan-i-jahan
Bahadur returned
from Jodhpur after
demolishing its
temples, and
bringing with himself
several cart-loads of
idols. The emperor
ordered that the
idols should be cast
in the quadrangle of
the court and under
the steps of Jama
masjid for being
trodden upon”

16. The language of the record speaks for
itself. It leaves no doubt that they took
immense pride in doing what they did.

17. Sultan Ahmud
Shah I Wali
Bahmani(ad
1422-1435):
in Tarikh-i-
Firishta.
“…wherever he(Ahmud
Shah) went put to death
men, women, children,
without mercy…”
“…Whenever the
number of slain
amounted to 20,000,
he halted 3 days, and
made a festival
celebration of the
bloody event…”

18. 1 January 1705:
Aurangzeb’s reign
“The Emperor,
summoning
Muhammad Khalil
and Khidmat Rai, the
darogha of hatchet-
men …,ordered them
to demolidh the
temple of
Pandharpur, and to
take the buthers of
the camp there and
slaughter cows in the
temple… It was
done.”

19. Even after records provided by Aurangzeb
himself, Marxist historians force us to
believe that whatever Aurangzeb did was
for economic purposes. That there were no
conflicts on the base of Religion.

20. The real color of
ISLAM

26. Even after all this, such extracts were found
from the textbook for Class V, saying:
“…Islam and Christianity are the only religions
which treated man with honor and equality…”

27. Excerpts from Quran
 Quran, 9:123 :"O you who believe, fight those of
the unbelievers near you and let them see how
harsh you can be...”
 Quran, 4.89: “...take not from among them friends
until they fly (their homes) in Allah’s way; but if
they turn back [to their homes], then seize them and
kill them wherever you find them...”

28. Historians shut their eyes to all this.
“Composite culture” is all they speak.

29. How a group of few
invading Aryans
over-ran this
extensive culture
without leaving any
archeological or
literary traces. It is
never explained.
Still this ridiculous
theory which has
no historical
records is taught in
schools.
Excavation shows Harappan civilization
covered areas from musa khel in the North
– west to Kolapur in southern-
maharashtra to the far east.

30. Historical records dose not support Aryan
invasion theory. It is a concoction of the
Europeans to make Indians feel lowly of
their culture.
But these historians still force us to
believe it.

31. The main concern of our “eminent historians”
is to completely forgive Islam of these notions
and of campaigns and deeds which flow from
them.

32. These Historians have always malign
Hinduism. But they don‟t see any fault
with Islamic killing.

33. When anybody tries to rewrite the true
history, they say it‟s a plot to distort
the history.

34. Arun Shourie and K.M. Shrimali were
invited on “aap ki adalat” ,a
programme on Zee TV.
Raghuvanshi asked Shrimali whether
Aurangzeb was a religious bigot.
But, Shrimali gave no clear answer, only
asserting that Aurangzeb's court had many
Hindu nobles.

35. Foul play of Marxist historians
There are two pillars of present history-writing
in India:
 To produce evidence which will establish
Hindus to be intolerant .
 To respect and show an sympathetic
understanding of Islamic communalism.

36. Foul play of Marxist historians
N. Jha says:
 The Brahmins depend on sacrifices. He even said
that “animal sacrifice was a source of their
livelihood.”
 So Ashoka preached Buddhism and non-violence to
undermine Brahmin influence.
No need for any historical evidence.

37. Effect of History on Students
Effects on students of the history
taught in schools and colleges
 They get estranged from the real history.
 They takes these assertions to be truth.
 They never ask for the evidences. For them
it becomes:
A truth which has been
proven for ages.

38. The communist theory has failed in other parts
of the world.
But not India.
Because these people occupy pivotal positions
in media and the educational structure.

39. After 34 years scholarly work is again being
done which reveals the real facts.
But it is not being allowed to reach a large
number.

40. THANK YOU