SlideShare a Scribd company logo
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - DULUTH
JT8D Jet Engine Analysis
Justin Rees
12/15/2015
The analysisof the JT8D engine involvesusingEESsoftware tounderstandthe performanceof the
engine whenoperatingconditionsare changing.The analysis includesfourparts:BaselineCheck,Effect
of Altitude,Effectof BypassRatioandEffectof Pressure Ratio.
Introduction
The purpose of the analysisistoillustrate how the performance of the jetengine isaffected by
variable operatingconditions.The variable operatingconditions accountedforinthe analysisinclude jet
speed,cruise altitude,bypassratioandcompressorfactor.Eachof these parametersisanalyzed
individuallytorecognize the change inperformance. PrattandWhitney’sJT8DTurbofanengine willbe
usedinthe analysis.The JT8D is a popularandreliable commercialaviationengine usedonthe
McDonnell DouglasDC-9,Boeing727 and 737 aircrafts.
Methodology
In orderto successfullyanalyze the JT8Djetengine,some assumptionsneededtobe made.The
primaryand secondaryflownozzlesoperate “ondesign”,meaningthe engine producesthrustonly by
meansof momentum.Additionallyinthe stage Icompressor,the pressure change acrossthe fanis
included inthe pressure ratio.The engineisassumedtobe in a steadystate and steadyflow scenario.
The analysiswascompletedinthe programEES (EngineeringEquationSolver).The programwasused
for itsthermodynamicfunctions:density, entropyandenthalpy.The EEScode can be locatedin
Appendix A. Figure 1belowillustratesthe differentstatesof the engineusedinthe analysis withthe
same numberingsystem. Asseeninthe diagram, the high-pressure turbine spinsthe rearcompressor
and the low-pressure turbinespinsboth the frontcompressorandthe fan.
Figure 1: JT8D Cutaway Detailed States
Part I: Baseline Check
The Baseline Checkwasusedtocalculate the take-off thrustforone engine andthe enthalpyvsentropy
(h-s) diagramat the basicparameters,whichincludes:
 No Bypass,B=0
 CruisingAltitude@sealevel,z=0
 AircraftSpeed,Vaircraft=0
 CompressorFactor,x=1
The take-off thrustcalculatedatthese parametersis107,893 N (24,255 lbf).Thisisan acceptable value
since Pratt andWhitney’sJT8Dspecslista take-off thrustof 14,000 - 21,700 lbf of thrust whichincludes
a bypassratio of approximatelyone.The take-off thrustwasrecalculatedwithabypassof one and
foundto be 15,485 lbf thrust,whichconcurs with Prattand Whitney’s specs.
Figure 2: Actual h-s Diagram for Baseline Parameters
Table 1: Actual Values for Baseline h-s Diagram
Actual Values for Baseline h-s
State
h
(kJ/kg)
s
(kJ/kg*K)
P
(kPa)
2 288.4 5.661 101.3
13 377.7 5.692 233
2.5 456.9 5.71 425.6
3 699.6 5.757 1617
4 1819 6.776 1556
4.5 1583 6.796 853.6
5 1419 6.812 535.9
9 911.4 6.823 101.3
Part II: Effectof Altitude
The analysisinthissectioninvolvesthe cruisingaltitudetobe a variable between0and14,000 meters.
Most commercial aircraftoperate at a cruisingaltitude of 30,000 ft.(9144 meters).The analysisinvolved
a bypassratio of five,jetspeedof 295 m/s andthe compressorfactorto be one.
Firstthe thrust developed byasingle enginewasplottedversusaltitude.The thrustdevelopedbythe
engine decreasesasthe elevationincreases.Thisisdue tothe densityof airdecreasingathigher
altitudes.Densityisafunctionof temperature andpressure whichbothdecrease withahigheraltitude.
The thrust decreasesbecause the massflow rate of airis decreasedwiththe lowerdensityof air.
Figure 3: Altitude vs Thrust for a Single Engine Plot
The cost to flyone-wayfromNewYorkto San Francisco(3500 miles) atthe varyingaltitudeswasfound
usingtwoengineslike mostcommercial planes.The costwasfoundusinga fuel costof $0.48/kg of JP-4
jetfuel.The flightcostislowerathigherelevations.Thisistobe expectedsince the massflow rate of air
islowerwhichresultsinthe fuel flowrate toalsobe lower.
Figure 4: Altitude vs. Cost (2 Engines New York to San Francisco)
The thermal efficiencyisalsoinfluencedbythe varyingaltitude. Thermal efficiency will increaseby
eitherloweringthe atmosphericpressure/temperatureorincreasingthe turbine inlet
pressure/temperature.Inthiscase the thermal efficiencyisincreasedbyloweringthe atmospheric
conditions. The thermal efficiencyincreasesathigheraltitudessince the pressureandtemperature
allowfora higheramountof work to be producedbythe compressor, turbine andnozzle.
Figure 5: Altitude vs. Thermal Efficiency
Part III: Effectof Bypass Ratio
The nextstage of the analysisinvolvesadjustingthe bypassratiotochange the thrustproduced. The
analysisutilizes ajetspeedof 295 m/s, cruisingaltitude of 11,300 meters,compressorfactorof one and
varyingthe bypassratio from 0 to 15.
As showninFigure 6, the specificthrustincreaseswiththe bypassratio.Thisisdue to the highermass
flowrate of airthrough the bypasssectionof the engine eventhoughthe velocityleavingisnotashigh
as the core velocity.There isalimitforthe bypassratioof approximately38:1 forthisanalysis.The core
requiresacertainmass flowrate of air inorder to spinthe fanwhichdrawsthe air intothe bypass.
Therefore if the core doesn’treceiveenoughairthenthe low-pressure turbine (4.5-5) cannotproduce
enoughworkto spinthe frontcompressor(2-2.5) and the fan (2-13). Accordingto Pratt and Whitney,
the JT8D isoperatedwitha bypassratioof 1.0 – 1.7.
Figure 6: Bypass Ratio vs. Specific Thrust
Part IV: Effectof Pressure Ratio
The last variable analyzedwasthe effectof variable pressure ratio. The controllingvariableswere jet
speedof aircraftat 295 m/s,cruisingaltitude of 11,300 meters,bypassratioof six andthe compressor
factor varyingfromone to two.
The specificthrustincreaseswiththe pressure ratiountilthe compressorfactorreaches1.778. The
specificthrustthenfallsandeventuallythe plane will stopflyingata compressorfactorof 2.2. The
reasonthe curve behaveslike thisisthatthe compressorsrequire more worktohave themcompress
the air to a greaterpressure.The specificthrustincreasesuntil the turbinescannotprovide enoughwork
to spinthe compressorstotheirdesiredpressure ratio. Inorderforthe specificthrusttokeepincreasing
withthe pressure ratio,the inlettemperature of the high-pressure turbine (4-4.5) needstobe
increased. Table 2,showsthe increasesinpressure from(2-4) of the engine andthe high-pressure
turbine inlettemperature (Tmax) isconstantthroughout.
Figure 7: Effect of Pressure Ratio vs. Specific Thrust
Table 2: Parametric Table from EES for variable compressor factor, x
Conclusion
The analysisdemonstrateshowthe engine performance canbe enhancedwithchanging
operatingconditions.At14,000 metersthe engine hasthe greatestthermal efficiencyandhaslesscost
but alsodevelopslessthrustatthe higheraltitudes.The higherthe bypassratio,the more thrustthe
bypasscan produce until approximately38:1ratio whenthe core doesn’texperience enoughairflowto
spinthe fan.The pressure ratiowill produce more thrustthroughthe bypassbutlessthrustthroughthe
core andan optimal value of 1.778 was foundto produce the max specificthrust.Fromthisanalysisit
can be concludedforthe purpose of thisstudythatthe mostoptimal operatingconditionsare at14,000
metercruisingaltitude,a38:1 bypassratio anda compressorfactorof 1.778. Accordingto Pratt and
Whitney,the engine isoperatedata bypassof 1.0-1.7, fanpressure ratioof 1.92-2.21 and an overall
pressure ratioof 15.8-21.0.
Bibliography
JT8D ENGINE.(2012, October1). RetrievedDecember15, 2015, from
http://www.pw.utc.com/JT8D_Engine
(n.d.).RetrievedDecember15, 2015, from http://media-cache-
ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ab/b0/a0/abb0a0f955bbbecd26864cf7bc4406ef.jpg
Appendix A: EES Baseline Code
The baseline code was adjusted for each part of the analysis and used the same
equations throughout the analysis.
{Part I: Baseline Check}
{Operating Conditions}
Tatm = 288 - (0.0065*z) {Temperature as a function of altitude}
Patm_bar = 1.01325 - 0.000112*z + ((3.8*10^(-9))*z^2) {Pressure as a function of altitude}
Patm = Patm_bar * 100 {Converting bar to kPa}
T_max = 1650 {Max temperature at Turbine Inlet in Kelvin}
LHV = 44900 {kJ/kg}
Fuel_cost = 0.48 {$/kg}
Qdot_total = 85 {m^3/sec} {Inlet air volumetric flow rate, entering at location (1) of engine}
n_c = 0.87 {Compressor adiabatic efficiency}
n_t = 0.89 {Turbine adiabatic efficiency}
n_n = 0.98 {Nozzle adiabatic efficiency}
n_comb = 0.93 {Combustor adiabatic efficiency}
rp1 = 4.2*x {Pressure ratio in stage I Compressor}
rp2 = 3.8*x {Pressure ratio in stage II Compressor}
rp0 = 2.3*x {Pressure ratio in Fan Stage}
P_loss = 0.038 {Pressure loss in Combustor}
{Baseline Check Parameters}
V_aircraft = 0
z = 0
B = 0
x = 1
rho=Density(Air,T=Tatm,P=Patm)
mdot_total = Qdot_total * rho
mdot_secondary = B * mdot_core
mdot_core = mdot_total - mdot_secondary
P2 = Patm
T2 = Tatm
h2 = Enthalpy(Air, T=T2)
s2a = Entropy(Air, T=T2, P=P2)
ho2 = h2 + ((V_aircraft)^2)/2000
{Fan Stage}
P13 = rp0 * P2
s13s =s2a
s13s = Entropy(Air, T=T13, P=P13) {Use entropy function to find T13 isentropic}
h13s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T13)
n_c = (h13s - ho2) / (h13a - ho2) {Use efficiency to find h2 actual}
T13a = Temperature (Air, h=h13a)
s13a = Entropy(Air, T=T13a, P=P13)
w_fan = mdot_secondary * (h13a - ho2)
{Stage 1 Compressor}
P2.5 = rp1 * P2
s2.5s = s2a
s2.5s = Entropy(Air, T=T2.5s, P=P2.5) {Use entropy function to find T2.5 isentropic}
h2.5s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T2.5s)
n_c = (h2.5s - ho2) / (h2.5a - ho2) {Use efficiency to find h2.5 actual}
T2.5a = Temperature(Air, h=h2.5a)
s2.5a = Entropy(Air, T=T2.5a, P=P2.5)
w_comp1 = mdot_core * (h2.5a - ho2)
{Stage 2 Compressor}
P3 = rp2 * P2.5
s3s = s2.5a
s3s = Entropy(Air, T=T3, P=P3) {Use entropy function to find T3 isentropic}
h3s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T3)
n_c = (h3s - h2.5a) / (h3a - h2.5a) {Use efficiency to find h3 actual}
T3a = Temperature(Air, h=h3a)
s3a = Entropy(Air, T=T3a, P=P3)
w_comp2 = mdot_core*(h3a - h2.5a)
{Combustor}
T4 =T_max {Temperature leaving combustor as Max Turbine Inlet Temperature}
Qdot_in = mdot_fuel * LHV * n_comb {Qdot_in is the heat transfer rate going into the engine from the
combustor}
Qdot_in = (mdot_core + mdot_fuel) * (h4a) - (mdot_core*(h3a)) {Using the two Qdot_in equations to
solve for mdot_fuel}
h4a = Enthalpy(Air, T=T4)
P4 = P3 - (P3 * P_loss) {Combustor experiences 3.8% loss in pressure}
s4a = Entropy(Air, T=T4, P=P4)
{High Pressure Turbine}
{The High Pressure Turbine spins the Stage 2 Compressor, so work of High Pressure Turbine = work of
Stage 2 Compressor}
w_HPturb = w_comp2
w_HPturb = (mdot_fuel + mdot_core) * (h4a - h4.5a) {Use work to solve for h4.5a}
T4.5a = Temperature(Air, h=h4.5a)
n_t = (h4a - h4.5a) / (h4a - h4.5s)
T4.5s = Temperature(Air, h=h4.5s)
s4.5s = s4a
s4.5s = Entropy(Air, T=T4.5s, P=P4.5) {Use entropy function to solve for P4.5}
s4.5a = Entropy(Air, T=T4.5a, P=P4.5)
{Low Pressure Turbine}
{The Low Pressure Turbine spins the Stage 1 Compressor and Fan}
{So therefore the work of Low Pressure Turbine = work of Stage 1 Compressor + work of Fan}
w_LPturb = w_comp1 + w_fan
w_LPturb = (mdot_fuel + mdot_core) * (h4.5a - h5a) {Use work to solve for h5a}
T5a = Temperature(Air, h=h5a)
n_t = (h4.5a - h5a) / (h4.5a - h5s)
T5s = Temperature(Air, h=h5s)
s5s = s4.5a
s5s = Entropy(Air, T=T5s, P=P5) {Use entropy function to solve for P5}
s5a = Entropy(Air, T=T5a, P=P5)
{Nozzle}
ho9 = h5a {Stagnation enthalpy is constant through nozzle, no work in}
s9s = s5a
s9s = Entropy(Air, T=T9s, P=Patm) {Use to find T9s}
h9s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T9s) {Use to find h9s}
n_n = ((h5a - h9a) / (h5a - h9s)) {Use to find h9a}
T9a = Temperature(Air, h=h9a) {Use to find T9a}
s9a = Entropy(Air, T=T9a, P=Patm)
V9 = sqrt((ho9-h9a)*2000) {Need to use static enthalpy and stagnation enthalpy}
{Bypass Nozzle}
ho17 = h13a {Stagnation enthalpy is constant through nozzle, no work in}
s17s = s13a
s17s = Entropy(Air, T=T17s, P=Patm) {Use to find T17s}
h17s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T17s)
n_n = ((h13a - h17a) / (h13a - h17s)) {Use to find h17a}
T17a = Temperature(Air, h=h17a)
s17a = Entropy(Air, T=T17a, P=Patm)
V17 = sqrt((ho17-h17a)*2000)
{Thrust} {Divide by 4.48 to convert from N to lbf}
Thrust_core = (mdot_fuel+mdot_core) * (V9)
Thrust_bypass = ((mdot_secondary) * (V17))
Thrust_total = (Thrust_core + Thrust_bypass - ((mdot_core + mdot_secondary)*V_aircraft))
{Thermal Efficiency}
f = mdot_fuel / mdot_core
nth = (mdot_core*((1+f)*(((V9^2)/2000) - ((V_aircraft)^2/2000)))) / (mdot_core * f * LHV)
s_array[1..8] = [s2a, s13a, s2.5a, s3a, s4a, s4.5a, s5a, s9a]
h_array[1..8] = [h2, h13a, h2.5a, h3a, h4a, h4.5a, h5a, h9a]

More Related Content

What's hot

Trent 1000 presentation
Trent 1000 presentationTrent 1000 presentation
Trent 1000 presentation
Estevam Azevedo
 
Turbojet and Turbofan engines
Turbojet and Turbofan enginesTurbojet and Turbofan engines
Turbojet and Turbofan engines
ROHIT DEY
 
WHAT IS SUPERCHARGING AND TURBOCHARGING
WHAT IS SUPERCHARGING  AND TURBOCHARGINGWHAT IS SUPERCHARGING  AND TURBOCHARGING
WHAT IS SUPERCHARGING AND TURBOCHARGING
M. Ahmad
 
Gas turbine engine
Gas turbine engineGas turbine engine
Gas turbine engine
Uday Wankar
 
Turbofan engine
Turbofan engineTurbofan engine
Turbofan engine
Shambu S
 
Turbojet engines
Turbojet enginesTurbojet engines
Turbojet engines
sanjana_ane
 
centrifugal compressors.pptx
centrifugal compressors.pptxcentrifugal compressors.pptx
centrifugal compressors.pptx
TANVEERSINGHSOLANKI
 
Propulsion Laboratory Manual
Propulsion Laboratory Manual Propulsion Laboratory Manual
Ch.1
Ch.1Ch.1
Turboprop
TurbopropTurboprop
Turboprop
kivancgunendi
 
Aeroelasticity 2 marks
Aeroelasticity 2 marks Aeroelasticity 2 marks
Aeroelasticity 2 marks
raj kumar
 
Turbojet engines
Turbojet enginesTurbojet engines
Turbojet engines
pranav teli
 
Aircraft wing
Aircraft wingAircraft wing
Aircraft wing
Thirumal Aero
 
Jet Propulsion: Recap, Intake, Types of compressor, and More
Jet Propulsion: Recap, Intake, Types of compressor, and MoreJet Propulsion: Recap, Intake, Types of compressor, and More
Jet Propulsion: Recap, Intake, Types of compressor, and More
Jess Peters
 
Introduction to Turbochargers
Introduction to TurbochargersIntroduction to Turbochargers
Introduction to Turbochargers
Ahsan Hummayoun (B.E Mechanical)
 
Drag in aircrafts
Drag in aircraftsDrag in aircrafts
Drag in aircrafts
alpha_sherdil
 
i c engines efficiencies
i c engines efficienciesi c engines efficiencies
i c engines efficiencies
mp poonia
 
PULSE JET ENGINE
PULSE JET ENGINEPULSE JET ENGINE
PULSE JET ENGINE
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
 
737-MAX-differences from NG-handout-Rev-01
737-MAX-differences from NG-handout-Rev-01737-MAX-differences from NG-handout-Rev-01
737-MAX-differences from NG-handout-Rev-01
AmadeusVanBurren1
 
lift force
lift forcelift force
lift force
Robert Otieno
 

What's hot (20)

Trent 1000 presentation
Trent 1000 presentationTrent 1000 presentation
Trent 1000 presentation
 
Turbojet and Turbofan engines
Turbojet and Turbofan enginesTurbojet and Turbofan engines
Turbojet and Turbofan engines
 
WHAT IS SUPERCHARGING AND TURBOCHARGING
WHAT IS SUPERCHARGING  AND TURBOCHARGINGWHAT IS SUPERCHARGING  AND TURBOCHARGING
WHAT IS SUPERCHARGING AND TURBOCHARGING
 
Gas turbine engine
Gas turbine engineGas turbine engine
Gas turbine engine
 
Turbofan engine
Turbofan engineTurbofan engine
Turbofan engine
 
Turbojet engines
Turbojet enginesTurbojet engines
Turbojet engines
 
centrifugal compressors.pptx
centrifugal compressors.pptxcentrifugal compressors.pptx
centrifugal compressors.pptx
 
Propulsion Laboratory Manual
Propulsion Laboratory Manual Propulsion Laboratory Manual
Propulsion Laboratory Manual
 
Ch.1
Ch.1Ch.1
Ch.1
 
Turboprop
TurbopropTurboprop
Turboprop
 
Aeroelasticity 2 marks
Aeroelasticity 2 marks Aeroelasticity 2 marks
Aeroelasticity 2 marks
 
Turbojet engines
Turbojet enginesTurbojet engines
Turbojet engines
 
Aircraft wing
Aircraft wingAircraft wing
Aircraft wing
 
Jet Propulsion: Recap, Intake, Types of compressor, and More
Jet Propulsion: Recap, Intake, Types of compressor, and MoreJet Propulsion: Recap, Intake, Types of compressor, and More
Jet Propulsion: Recap, Intake, Types of compressor, and More
 
Introduction to Turbochargers
Introduction to TurbochargersIntroduction to Turbochargers
Introduction to Turbochargers
 
Drag in aircrafts
Drag in aircraftsDrag in aircrafts
Drag in aircrafts
 
i c engines efficiencies
i c engines efficienciesi c engines efficiencies
i c engines efficiencies
 
PULSE JET ENGINE
PULSE JET ENGINEPULSE JET ENGINE
PULSE JET ENGINE
 
737-MAX-differences from NG-handout-Rev-01
737-MAX-differences from NG-handout-Rev-01737-MAX-differences from NG-handout-Rev-01
737-MAX-differences from NG-handout-Rev-01
 
lift force
lift forcelift force
lift force
 

Similar to Analysis Report

Turbofan Engine Design Report
Turbofan Engine Design ReportTurbofan Engine Design Report
Turbofan Engine Design Report
Nicholas Cordero
 
JRAME Vol 3 2015 No 2 Part 2 PP 2 (3)
JRAME Vol 3 2015 No 2 Part 2 PP 2 (3)JRAME Vol 3 2015 No 2 Part 2 PP 2 (3)
JRAME Vol 3 2015 No 2 Part 2 PP 2 (3)
Kittipass Wasinarom
 
Summer Internship at Cranfield University-Report
Summer Internship at Cranfield University-ReportSummer Internship at Cranfield University-Report
Summer Internship at Cranfield University-Report
Sathyanarayanan Nagasundaram
 
Applied thermodynamics by mc conkey (ed 5, ch-12)
Applied thermodynamics by mc conkey (ed 5, ch-12)Applied thermodynamics by mc conkey (ed 5, ch-12)
Applied thermodynamics by mc conkey (ed 5, ch-12)
anasimdad007
 
Turbojet Design Project
Turbojet Design ProjectTurbojet Design Project
Turbojet Design Project
Carlos J Gutierrez
 
Improving Gas Turbine – HRSG output using Inlet Air Chilling and Converted Ev...
Improving Gas Turbine – HRSG output using Inlet Air Chilling and Converted Ev...Improving Gas Turbine – HRSG output using Inlet Air Chilling and Converted Ev...
Improving Gas Turbine – HRSG output using Inlet Air Chilling and Converted Ev...
IRJET Journal
 
Artículo evaluation of air heater performance and acurracy of the results
Artículo   evaluation of air heater performance and acurracy of the resultsArtículo   evaluation of air heater performance and acurracy of the results
Artículo evaluation of air heater performance and acurracy of the results
Caro Cuadras
 
turbocharger-and-supercharger.ppt
turbocharger-and-supercharger.pptturbocharger-and-supercharger.ppt
turbocharger-and-supercharger.ppt
SivaKumarP83
 
(ME- 495 Laboratory Exercise – Number 1 – Brayton Cycle -.docx
 (ME- 495 Laboratory Exercise – Number 1 – Brayton Cycle -.docx (ME- 495 Laboratory Exercise – Number 1 – Brayton Cycle -.docx
(ME- 495 Laboratory Exercise – Number 1 – Brayton Cycle -.docx
aryan532920
 
Effect of Compression Ratio on Performance of Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
Effect of Compression Ratio on Performance of Combined Cycle Gas TurbineEffect of Compression Ratio on Performance of Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
Effect of Compression Ratio on Performance of Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
ijsrd.com
 
Pr 1
Pr 1Pr 1
Torque estimator using MPPT method for wind turbines
Torque estimator using MPPT method for wind turbines Torque estimator using MPPT method for wind turbines
Torque estimator using MPPT method for wind turbines
IJECEIAES
 
Performance Gain for Multiple Stage Centrifugal Compressor by usi.pdf
Performance Gain for Multiple Stage Centrifugal Compressor by usi.pdfPerformance Gain for Multiple Stage Centrifugal Compressor by usi.pdf
Performance Gain for Multiple Stage Centrifugal Compressor by usi.pdf
bui thequan
 
Aircraft Propulsion Systems
Aircraft Propulsion SystemsAircraft Propulsion Systems
Aircraft Propulsion Systems
ahmad bassiouny
 
Gas turbine 2 - regeneration and intercooling
Gas turbine   2 - regeneration and intercoolingGas turbine   2 - regeneration and intercooling
Gas turbine 2 - regeneration and intercooling
Nihal Senanayake
 
I.C. Engines / Turbocharger and-supercharger
I.C. Engines / Turbocharger and-superchargerI.C. Engines / Turbocharger and-supercharger
I.C. Engines / Turbocharger and-supercharger
S.Shanmuga Sundaram
 
Brayton cycle (Gas Cycle)-Introduction
Brayton cycle (Gas Cycle)-IntroductionBrayton cycle (Gas Cycle)-Introduction
Brayton cycle (Gas Cycle)-Introduction
Hashim Hasnain Hadi
 
2 gas turbinepp
2 gas turbinepp2 gas turbinepp
2 gas turbinepp
skdass23
 
H1303043644
H1303043644H1303043644
H1303043644
IOSR Journals
 
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A COMBINED CYCLE GAS TURBINE UNDER VARYING OPERATING ...
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A COMBINED CYCLE GAS TURBINE UNDER VARYING OPERATING ...PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A COMBINED CYCLE GAS TURBINE UNDER VARYING OPERATING ...
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A COMBINED CYCLE GAS TURBINE UNDER VARYING OPERATING ...
meijjournal
 

Similar to Analysis Report (20)

Turbofan Engine Design Report
Turbofan Engine Design ReportTurbofan Engine Design Report
Turbofan Engine Design Report
 
JRAME Vol 3 2015 No 2 Part 2 PP 2 (3)
JRAME Vol 3 2015 No 2 Part 2 PP 2 (3)JRAME Vol 3 2015 No 2 Part 2 PP 2 (3)
JRAME Vol 3 2015 No 2 Part 2 PP 2 (3)
 
Summer Internship at Cranfield University-Report
Summer Internship at Cranfield University-ReportSummer Internship at Cranfield University-Report
Summer Internship at Cranfield University-Report
 
Applied thermodynamics by mc conkey (ed 5, ch-12)
Applied thermodynamics by mc conkey (ed 5, ch-12)Applied thermodynamics by mc conkey (ed 5, ch-12)
Applied thermodynamics by mc conkey (ed 5, ch-12)
 
Turbojet Design Project
Turbojet Design ProjectTurbojet Design Project
Turbojet Design Project
 
Improving Gas Turbine – HRSG output using Inlet Air Chilling and Converted Ev...
Improving Gas Turbine – HRSG output using Inlet Air Chilling and Converted Ev...Improving Gas Turbine – HRSG output using Inlet Air Chilling and Converted Ev...
Improving Gas Turbine – HRSG output using Inlet Air Chilling and Converted Ev...
 
Artículo evaluation of air heater performance and acurracy of the results
Artículo   evaluation of air heater performance and acurracy of the resultsArtículo   evaluation of air heater performance and acurracy of the results
Artículo evaluation of air heater performance and acurracy of the results
 
turbocharger-and-supercharger.ppt
turbocharger-and-supercharger.pptturbocharger-and-supercharger.ppt
turbocharger-and-supercharger.ppt
 
(ME- 495 Laboratory Exercise – Number 1 – Brayton Cycle -.docx
 (ME- 495 Laboratory Exercise – Number 1 – Brayton Cycle -.docx (ME- 495 Laboratory Exercise – Number 1 – Brayton Cycle -.docx
(ME- 495 Laboratory Exercise – Number 1 – Brayton Cycle -.docx
 
Effect of Compression Ratio on Performance of Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
Effect of Compression Ratio on Performance of Combined Cycle Gas TurbineEffect of Compression Ratio on Performance of Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
Effect of Compression Ratio on Performance of Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
 
Pr 1
Pr 1Pr 1
Pr 1
 
Torque estimator using MPPT method for wind turbines
Torque estimator using MPPT method for wind turbines Torque estimator using MPPT method for wind turbines
Torque estimator using MPPT method for wind turbines
 
Performance Gain for Multiple Stage Centrifugal Compressor by usi.pdf
Performance Gain for Multiple Stage Centrifugal Compressor by usi.pdfPerformance Gain for Multiple Stage Centrifugal Compressor by usi.pdf
Performance Gain for Multiple Stage Centrifugal Compressor by usi.pdf
 
Aircraft Propulsion Systems
Aircraft Propulsion SystemsAircraft Propulsion Systems
Aircraft Propulsion Systems
 
Gas turbine 2 - regeneration and intercooling
Gas turbine   2 - regeneration and intercoolingGas turbine   2 - regeneration and intercooling
Gas turbine 2 - regeneration and intercooling
 
I.C. Engines / Turbocharger and-supercharger
I.C. Engines / Turbocharger and-superchargerI.C. Engines / Turbocharger and-supercharger
I.C. Engines / Turbocharger and-supercharger
 
Brayton cycle (Gas Cycle)-Introduction
Brayton cycle (Gas Cycle)-IntroductionBrayton cycle (Gas Cycle)-Introduction
Brayton cycle (Gas Cycle)-Introduction
 
2 gas turbinepp
2 gas turbinepp2 gas turbinepp
2 gas turbinepp
 
H1303043644
H1303043644H1303043644
H1303043644
 
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A COMBINED CYCLE GAS TURBINE UNDER VARYING OPERATING ...
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A COMBINED CYCLE GAS TURBINE UNDER VARYING OPERATING ...PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A COMBINED CYCLE GAS TURBINE UNDER VARYING OPERATING ...
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A COMBINED CYCLE GAS TURBINE UNDER VARYING OPERATING ...
 

Analysis Report

  • 1. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - DULUTH JT8D Jet Engine Analysis Justin Rees 12/15/2015 The analysisof the JT8D engine involvesusingEESsoftware tounderstandthe performanceof the engine whenoperatingconditionsare changing.The analysis includesfourparts:BaselineCheck,Effect of Altitude,Effectof BypassRatioandEffectof Pressure Ratio.
  • 2. Introduction The purpose of the analysisistoillustrate how the performance of the jetengine isaffected by variable operatingconditions.The variable operatingconditions accountedforinthe analysisinclude jet speed,cruise altitude,bypassratioandcompressorfactor.Eachof these parametersisanalyzed individuallytorecognize the change inperformance. PrattandWhitney’sJT8DTurbofanengine willbe usedinthe analysis.The JT8D is a popularandreliable commercialaviationengine usedonthe McDonnell DouglasDC-9,Boeing727 and 737 aircrafts. Methodology In orderto successfullyanalyze the JT8Djetengine,some assumptionsneededtobe made.The primaryand secondaryflownozzlesoperate “ondesign”,meaningthe engine producesthrustonly by meansof momentum.Additionallyinthe stage Icompressor,the pressure change acrossthe fanis included inthe pressure ratio.The engineisassumedtobe in a steadystate and steadyflow scenario. The analysiswascompletedinthe programEES (EngineeringEquationSolver).The programwasused for itsthermodynamicfunctions:density, entropyandenthalpy.The EEScode can be locatedin Appendix A. Figure 1belowillustratesthe differentstatesof the engineusedinthe analysis withthe same numberingsystem. Asseeninthe diagram, the high-pressure turbine spinsthe rearcompressor and the low-pressure turbinespinsboth the frontcompressorandthe fan. Figure 1: JT8D Cutaway Detailed States Part I: Baseline Check The Baseline Checkwasusedtocalculate the take-off thrustforone engine andthe enthalpyvsentropy (h-s) diagramat the basicparameters,whichincludes:  No Bypass,B=0  CruisingAltitude@sealevel,z=0  AircraftSpeed,Vaircraft=0  CompressorFactor,x=1
  • 3. The take-off thrustcalculatedatthese parametersis107,893 N (24,255 lbf).Thisisan acceptable value since Pratt andWhitney’sJT8Dspecslista take-off thrustof 14,000 - 21,700 lbf of thrust whichincludes a bypassratio of approximatelyone.The take-off thrustwasrecalculatedwithabypassof one and foundto be 15,485 lbf thrust,whichconcurs with Prattand Whitney’s specs. Figure 2: Actual h-s Diagram for Baseline Parameters Table 1: Actual Values for Baseline h-s Diagram Actual Values for Baseline h-s State h (kJ/kg) s (kJ/kg*K) P (kPa) 2 288.4 5.661 101.3 13 377.7 5.692 233 2.5 456.9 5.71 425.6 3 699.6 5.757 1617 4 1819 6.776 1556 4.5 1583 6.796 853.6 5 1419 6.812 535.9 9 911.4 6.823 101.3 Part II: Effectof Altitude The analysisinthissectioninvolvesthe cruisingaltitudetobe a variable between0and14,000 meters. Most commercial aircraftoperate at a cruisingaltitude of 30,000 ft.(9144 meters).The analysisinvolved a bypassratio of five,jetspeedof 295 m/s andthe compressorfactorto be one.
  • 4. Firstthe thrust developed byasingle enginewasplottedversusaltitude.The thrustdevelopedbythe engine decreasesasthe elevationincreases.Thisisdue tothe densityof airdecreasingathigher altitudes.Densityisafunctionof temperature andpressure whichbothdecrease withahigheraltitude. The thrust decreasesbecause the massflow rate of airis decreasedwiththe lowerdensityof air. Figure 3: Altitude vs Thrust for a Single Engine Plot The cost to flyone-wayfromNewYorkto San Francisco(3500 miles) atthe varyingaltitudeswasfound usingtwoengineslike mostcommercial planes.The costwasfoundusinga fuel costof $0.48/kg of JP-4 jetfuel.The flightcostislowerathigherelevations.Thisistobe expectedsince the massflow rate of air islowerwhichresultsinthe fuel flowrate toalsobe lower. Figure 4: Altitude vs. Cost (2 Engines New York to San Francisco)
  • 5. The thermal efficiencyisalsoinfluencedbythe varyingaltitude. Thermal efficiency will increaseby eitherloweringthe atmosphericpressure/temperatureorincreasingthe turbine inlet pressure/temperature.Inthiscase the thermal efficiencyisincreasedbyloweringthe atmospheric conditions. The thermal efficiencyincreasesathigheraltitudessince the pressureandtemperature allowfora higheramountof work to be producedbythe compressor, turbine andnozzle. Figure 5: Altitude vs. Thermal Efficiency Part III: Effectof Bypass Ratio The nextstage of the analysisinvolvesadjustingthe bypassratiotochange the thrustproduced. The analysisutilizes ajetspeedof 295 m/s, cruisingaltitude of 11,300 meters,compressorfactorof one and varyingthe bypassratio from 0 to 15. As showninFigure 6, the specificthrustincreaseswiththe bypassratio.Thisisdue to the highermass flowrate of airthrough the bypasssectionof the engine eventhoughthe velocityleavingisnotashigh as the core velocity.There isalimitforthe bypassratioof approximately38:1 forthisanalysis.The core requiresacertainmass flowrate of air inorder to spinthe fanwhichdrawsthe air intothe bypass. Therefore if the core doesn’treceiveenoughairthenthe low-pressure turbine (4.5-5) cannotproduce enoughworkto spinthe frontcompressor(2-2.5) and the fan (2-13). Accordingto Pratt and Whitney, the JT8D isoperatedwitha bypassratioof 1.0 – 1.7.
  • 6. Figure 6: Bypass Ratio vs. Specific Thrust Part IV: Effectof Pressure Ratio The last variable analyzedwasthe effectof variable pressure ratio. The controllingvariableswere jet speedof aircraftat 295 m/s,cruisingaltitude of 11,300 meters,bypassratioof six andthe compressor factor varyingfromone to two. The specificthrustincreaseswiththe pressure ratiountilthe compressorfactorreaches1.778. The specificthrustthenfallsandeventuallythe plane will stopflyingata compressorfactorof 2.2. The reasonthe curve behaveslike thisisthatthe compressorsrequire more worktohave themcompress the air to a greaterpressure.The specificthrustincreasesuntil the turbinescannotprovide enoughwork to spinthe compressorstotheirdesiredpressure ratio. Inorderforthe specificthrusttokeepincreasing withthe pressure ratio,the inlettemperature of the high-pressure turbine (4-4.5) needstobe increased. Table 2,showsthe increasesinpressure from(2-4) of the engine andthe high-pressure turbine inlettemperature (Tmax) isconstantthroughout.
  • 7. Figure 7: Effect of Pressure Ratio vs. Specific Thrust Table 2: Parametric Table from EES for variable compressor factor, x Conclusion The analysisdemonstrateshowthe engine performance canbe enhancedwithchanging operatingconditions.At14,000 metersthe engine hasthe greatestthermal efficiencyandhaslesscost but alsodevelopslessthrustatthe higheraltitudes.The higherthe bypassratio,the more thrustthe bypasscan produce until approximately38:1ratio whenthe core doesn’texperience enoughairflowto spinthe fan.The pressure ratiowill produce more thrustthroughthe bypassbutlessthrustthroughthe core andan optimal value of 1.778 was foundto produce the max specificthrust.Fromthisanalysisit can be concludedforthe purpose of thisstudythatthe mostoptimal operatingconditionsare at14,000 metercruisingaltitude,a38:1 bypassratio anda compressorfactorof 1.778. Accordingto Pratt and Whitney,the engine isoperatedata bypassof 1.0-1.7, fanpressure ratioof 1.92-2.21 and an overall pressure ratioof 15.8-21.0.
  • 8. Bibliography JT8D ENGINE.(2012, October1). RetrievedDecember15, 2015, from http://www.pw.utc.com/JT8D_Engine (n.d.).RetrievedDecember15, 2015, from http://media-cache- ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ab/b0/a0/abb0a0f955bbbecd26864cf7bc4406ef.jpg
  • 9. Appendix A: EES Baseline Code The baseline code was adjusted for each part of the analysis and used the same equations throughout the analysis.
  • 10. {Part I: Baseline Check} {Operating Conditions} Tatm = 288 - (0.0065*z) {Temperature as a function of altitude} Patm_bar = 1.01325 - 0.000112*z + ((3.8*10^(-9))*z^2) {Pressure as a function of altitude} Patm = Patm_bar * 100 {Converting bar to kPa} T_max = 1650 {Max temperature at Turbine Inlet in Kelvin} LHV = 44900 {kJ/kg} Fuel_cost = 0.48 {$/kg} Qdot_total = 85 {m^3/sec} {Inlet air volumetric flow rate, entering at location (1) of engine} n_c = 0.87 {Compressor adiabatic efficiency} n_t = 0.89 {Turbine adiabatic efficiency} n_n = 0.98 {Nozzle adiabatic efficiency} n_comb = 0.93 {Combustor adiabatic efficiency} rp1 = 4.2*x {Pressure ratio in stage I Compressor} rp2 = 3.8*x {Pressure ratio in stage II Compressor} rp0 = 2.3*x {Pressure ratio in Fan Stage} P_loss = 0.038 {Pressure loss in Combustor} {Baseline Check Parameters} V_aircraft = 0 z = 0 B = 0 x = 1 rho=Density(Air,T=Tatm,P=Patm) mdot_total = Qdot_total * rho mdot_secondary = B * mdot_core mdot_core = mdot_total - mdot_secondary P2 = Patm T2 = Tatm h2 = Enthalpy(Air, T=T2) s2a = Entropy(Air, T=T2, P=P2) ho2 = h2 + ((V_aircraft)^2)/2000 {Fan Stage} P13 = rp0 * P2 s13s =s2a s13s = Entropy(Air, T=T13, P=P13) {Use entropy function to find T13 isentropic} h13s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T13) n_c = (h13s - ho2) / (h13a - ho2) {Use efficiency to find h2 actual} T13a = Temperature (Air, h=h13a) s13a = Entropy(Air, T=T13a, P=P13) w_fan = mdot_secondary * (h13a - ho2) {Stage 1 Compressor} P2.5 = rp1 * P2 s2.5s = s2a s2.5s = Entropy(Air, T=T2.5s, P=P2.5) {Use entropy function to find T2.5 isentropic} h2.5s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T2.5s) n_c = (h2.5s - ho2) / (h2.5a - ho2) {Use efficiency to find h2.5 actual} T2.5a = Temperature(Air, h=h2.5a) s2.5a = Entropy(Air, T=T2.5a, P=P2.5) w_comp1 = mdot_core * (h2.5a - ho2)
  • 11. {Stage 2 Compressor} P3 = rp2 * P2.5 s3s = s2.5a s3s = Entropy(Air, T=T3, P=P3) {Use entropy function to find T3 isentropic} h3s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T3) n_c = (h3s - h2.5a) / (h3a - h2.5a) {Use efficiency to find h3 actual} T3a = Temperature(Air, h=h3a) s3a = Entropy(Air, T=T3a, P=P3) w_comp2 = mdot_core*(h3a - h2.5a) {Combustor} T4 =T_max {Temperature leaving combustor as Max Turbine Inlet Temperature} Qdot_in = mdot_fuel * LHV * n_comb {Qdot_in is the heat transfer rate going into the engine from the combustor} Qdot_in = (mdot_core + mdot_fuel) * (h4a) - (mdot_core*(h3a)) {Using the two Qdot_in equations to solve for mdot_fuel} h4a = Enthalpy(Air, T=T4) P4 = P3 - (P3 * P_loss) {Combustor experiences 3.8% loss in pressure} s4a = Entropy(Air, T=T4, P=P4) {High Pressure Turbine} {The High Pressure Turbine spins the Stage 2 Compressor, so work of High Pressure Turbine = work of Stage 2 Compressor} w_HPturb = w_comp2 w_HPturb = (mdot_fuel + mdot_core) * (h4a - h4.5a) {Use work to solve for h4.5a} T4.5a = Temperature(Air, h=h4.5a) n_t = (h4a - h4.5a) / (h4a - h4.5s) T4.5s = Temperature(Air, h=h4.5s) s4.5s = s4a s4.5s = Entropy(Air, T=T4.5s, P=P4.5) {Use entropy function to solve for P4.5} s4.5a = Entropy(Air, T=T4.5a, P=P4.5) {Low Pressure Turbine} {The Low Pressure Turbine spins the Stage 1 Compressor and Fan} {So therefore the work of Low Pressure Turbine = work of Stage 1 Compressor + work of Fan} w_LPturb = w_comp1 + w_fan w_LPturb = (mdot_fuel + mdot_core) * (h4.5a - h5a) {Use work to solve for h5a} T5a = Temperature(Air, h=h5a) n_t = (h4.5a - h5a) / (h4.5a - h5s) T5s = Temperature(Air, h=h5s) s5s = s4.5a s5s = Entropy(Air, T=T5s, P=P5) {Use entropy function to solve for P5} s5a = Entropy(Air, T=T5a, P=P5) {Nozzle} ho9 = h5a {Stagnation enthalpy is constant through nozzle, no work in} s9s = s5a s9s = Entropy(Air, T=T9s, P=Patm) {Use to find T9s} h9s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T9s) {Use to find h9s} n_n = ((h5a - h9a) / (h5a - h9s)) {Use to find h9a} T9a = Temperature(Air, h=h9a) {Use to find T9a} s9a = Entropy(Air, T=T9a, P=Patm) V9 = sqrt((ho9-h9a)*2000) {Need to use static enthalpy and stagnation enthalpy}
  • 12. {Bypass Nozzle} ho17 = h13a {Stagnation enthalpy is constant through nozzle, no work in} s17s = s13a s17s = Entropy(Air, T=T17s, P=Patm) {Use to find T17s} h17s = Enthalpy(Air, T=T17s) n_n = ((h13a - h17a) / (h13a - h17s)) {Use to find h17a} T17a = Temperature(Air, h=h17a) s17a = Entropy(Air, T=T17a, P=Patm) V17 = sqrt((ho17-h17a)*2000) {Thrust} {Divide by 4.48 to convert from N to lbf} Thrust_core = (mdot_fuel+mdot_core) * (V9) Thrust_bypass = ((mdot_secondary) * (V17)) Thrust_total = (Thrust_core + Thrust_bypass - ((mdot_core + mdot_secondary)*V_aircraft)) {Thermal Efficiency} f = mdot_fuel / mdot_core nth = (mdot_core*((1+f)*(((V9^2)/2000) - ((V_aircraft)^2/2000)))) / (mdot_core * f * LHV) s_array[1..8] = [s2a, s13a, s2.5a, s3a, s4a, s4.5a, s5a, s9a] h_array[1..8] = [h2, h13a, h2.5a, h3a, h4a, h4.5a, h5a, h9a]