Case Study : Delhi Metro
Airport Express Line
Bhaskar Bhattacharya
Phases
Background : Delhi Metro & DMRC
Project Details : Airport Express Metro Line
Options before DMRC
Suggested ‘Way Ahead’
Delhi Metro
Airport Express Line
Reason
 Population of over 10 million
 More registered vehicles than Mumbai, Kolkata
& Chennai put together
 Automobiles contributing to more than 2/3rd of
the total atmospheric pollution
 High rate of road accidents
 More than 35 studies recommended ‘Mass
Rapid Transit System’
Background
Delhi Metro & DMRC
Conditions that necessitated setting up of DMRC….
 Need for reliable public transportation in Delhi
 Comprehensive traffic & transportation study
completed in 1990 highlighted the urgent need
for a rail-based transit system comprising a
network of underground elevated and surface
corridors to meet the traffic demand projected
for 2021
 Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (DMRC)
registered on 3rd May 1995 for the Construction
& Operation
Background
Delhi Metro & DMRC
DMRC becomes a necessity……
Background
Delhi Metro & DMRC
20% of the cost borne by the Central Government
20% of the cost borne by the GNCTD
About 50 – 60% of the cost through JBIC Loan
5% of the cost by DMRC through Property
Development
Cost Structure for projects by DMRC……
Challenges
 Biggest urban invention in transportation since
independence
 Executed in very difficult urban environment
 All actions under close scrutiny of all agencies
 Implementation period compressed from 10 years
to 7 years
 Constructed to world class standards with
frontline technologies
 Expertise and technology was not available in the
country
Background
Delhi Metro & DMRC
Challenges successfully negotiated by DMRC….
A rapid transit system serving NCR
 Network consists of six lines with a total length of 62
Kms ( eventually extended to 183.7 Kms)
 40 stations ( eventually extended to 140) of which 35
are underground
Background
Delhi Metro & DMRC
Objectives achieved by DMRC in NCR till Aug
2006 i.e. the date setting of this case study …..
Background
Delhi Metro & DMRC
2002
2005
2004
2010
2010
Mansarovar Park
Rohini
Botonical Garden
Noida
Dwarka
ISBT
Karol Bagh
Udyog Nagar
Jahangirpuri
IFFCO Chowk
Tuglakabad
Mandi
House
Airport Express Line
Rly Stn
Shivaji
Stadium
Aerocity
IGI
Airport
Dwarka
Sect 21
Airport Express Line
Length 19.2 Km
- 5.5 km underground
- 11.6 km of elevated tracks
- Balance- switchover ramps
Cost: 2381 Cr less taxes & duties
: addl reqmt of 559 Cr for Rolling Stock
Generaion of Necessity
Airport Express Line
 IGAI was envisaged to handle 18 million passengers by
2010-11 & 70 million by 2034-35
Movement primarily through taxis & private vehicles.
Bus services were few & inadequate
Travel time from center of Delhi to IGAI approx 1 Hr
CWG was likely to bring in a large number of tourists &
sports participants
Terms of Reference
Airport Express line
 September 2010 deadline for CWG
Direct Route to IGAI , ride with most people sitting with space for
luggage
Max speed of 135 kms/hr with operating speeds of 100 Kms/hr
Four stn reqd: Two stns close to City Centre, One stn
Intermediate & One stn at airport terminal
Provision for interchanges with DMRC lines & other public
transport systems
Provision for future stations
Decision between DMRC & PPP/BOT
Stakeholders
Airport Express line
GoI- Empowered Gp of Min, Committee of Secretaries
GNCTD (Govt of National Capital Territory of Delhi)
DMRC
DIAL(Delhi International Airport Limited)
Private Finance/ Banks
Agencies/Departments according various clearances
Residents of Delhi
Project Details
Airport Express Line
 Project Length 19.2 Km with a hybrid mix:
- l5.5 Km of underground tracks
- 11.6 Km of elevated tracks
- Remaining would be for switch-over ramps
Expected traffic 86,000 by 2021
Turn-around time of 55-60 min
Express line would terminate at the Airport
Each station would have a circulating area of 10,000-20,000
SqM of which 50% could be used for commercial purposes
Cost of Proj- 2381Cr (less the taxes & duties)
Concerns
Airport Express Line
Alignment of the line at places like cantonment areas where
permission would be mandatory for elevated corridors
Alignment crossed major city roads affecting utilities like
sewers, water mains, storm water drains, telephone & electricity
lines. These were not to be disrupted during the construction
phase
Felling of 300-400 trees
Permission from different regulators & utility operators
DIAL had reservations on elevated station on Airport
Security of the line
Ambitious time frame of four years
Options
DMRC vs PPP
 Funding from the GoI for a
facility to be primarily used
by air passengers may not
be forthcoming
DMRC had to secure entire
funding
DIAL to bear expenses for
civil works inside airport to
the tune of 440 Cr
DDA would be required to
pitch in for better
connectivity to Dwarka
Responsibility of the
project with private investor
 Heavy capital investment
& long gestation periods
BOT projects involved 1/3rd
equity & 2/3rd debt @ 10%
Private funding may have
to be extended through VGF
(viability gap funding)
DMRC PPP/BOT
Funding
Options
DMRC vs PPP
 DMRC/GNCTD to be
responsible for land
acquisitions, securing
permission from different
agencies for both
construction & operations
 Form 1
Private investor to be
responsible for land
acquisition & all clearances
 Form 2
Land Acquisition &
clearances facilitated by
DMRC/GNCTD
DMRC PPP/BOT
Permissions & Clearances
Options
DMRC vs PPP
 DMRC has domain expertise,
momentum from past & running
projects & trained manpower
Good offices with GoI, GNCTD &
agencies according
permissions/clearances
Vital engineering equipment like
heavy duty cranes & plant
equipment already available on site
Rolling stock from previously
completed projects
Knowledge of existing facilities
like electricity & sewer lines, water
supply lines
 Tried & tested team with
excellent reasults
 Very few private companies with
this kind of an expertise
May have to poach experts from
DMRC itself for critical functions
May have to further subcontract
indl segments
Procurement of heavy
engineering eqpt may delay
commencement of the project
Lack of trained manpower
No knowledge of layout of
amenities
Good offices have to be
established through liaison with all
agencies
DMRC PPP/BOTExecution & Operation
Suggested Road Ahead
Airport Express Line
 A lot is at stake on the project (National image)
Contract procedure followed by subcontracting, is a time consuming
process
Critical amenities cannot be disturbed for a prolonged period
Environmental, Forest & other clearances have to be fast-tracked
Procurement of Engineering Eqpt & construction stores at a very rapid
pace has its challenges
Quality control on the project when time lines are critical
 Availability of Trained Manpower at all levels
Good leadership
Good Offices with various agencies
Suggested Road Ahead
Airport Express Line
 DMRC is best suited to undertake the project
 Involving any other agency without domain expertise
may prove disastrous with such critical timelines
If funding is an issue with GoI & PPP/BOT becomes the
only option, then supervision & reporting on a daily basis
may have to be done by DMRC
 Instructions from GOI to all agencies to issue
clearances on a war footing
Thank You

Airport express line

  • 1.
    Case Study :Delhi Metro Airport Express Line Bhaskar Bhattacharya
  • 2.
    Phases Background : DelhiMetro & DMRC Project Details : Airport Express Metro Line Options before DMRC Suggested ‘Way Ahead’ Delhi Metro Airport Express Line
  • 3.
    Reason  Population ofover 10 million  More registered vehicles than Mumbai, Kolkata & Chennai put together  Automobiles contributing to more than 2/3rd of the total atmospheric pollution  High rate of road accidents  More than 35 studies recommended ‘Mass Rapid Transit System’ Background Delhi Metro & DMRC Conditions that necessitated setting up of DMRC….
  • 4.
     Need forreliable public transportation in Delhi  Comprehensive traffic & transportation study completed in 1990 highlighted the urgent need for a rail-based transit system comprising a network of underground elevated and surface corridors to meet the traffic demand projected for 2021  Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (DMRC) registered on 3rd May 1995 for the Construction & Operation Background Delhi Metro & DMRC DMRC becomes a necessity……
  • 5.
    Background Delhi Metro &DMRC 20% of the cost borne by the Central Government 20% of the cost borne by the GNCTD About 50 – 60% of the cost through JBIC Loan 5% of the cost by DMRC through Property Development Cost Structure for projects by DMRC……
  • 6.
    Challenges  Biggest urbaninvention in transportation since independence  Executed in very difficult urban environment  All actions under close scrutiny of all agencies  Implementation period compressed from 10 years to 7 years  Constructed to world class standards with frontline technologies  Expertise and technology was not available in the country Background Delhi Metro & DMRC Challenges successfully negotiated by DMRC….
  • 7.
    A rapid transitsystem serving NCR  Network consists of six lines with a total length of 62 Kms ( eventually extended to 183.7 Kms)  40 stations ( eventually extended to 140) of which 35 are underground Background Delhi Metro & DMRC Objectives achieved by DMRC in NCR till Aug 2006 i.e. the date setting of this case study …..
  • 8.
    Background Delhi Metro &DMRC 2002 2005 2004 2010 2010 Mansarovar Park Rohini Botonical Garden Noida Dwarka ISBT Karol Bagh Udyog Nagar Jahangirpuri IFFCO Chowk Tuglakabad Mandi House
  • 9.
    Airport Express Line RlyStn Shivaji Stadium Aerocity IGI Airport Dwarka Sect 21
  • 10.
    Airport Express Line Length19.2 Km - 5.5 km underground - 11.6 km of elevated tracks - Balance- switchover ramps Cost: 2381 Cr less taxes & duties : addl reqmt of 559 Cr for Rolling Stock
  • 11.
    Generaion of Necessity AirportExpress Line  IGAI was envisaged to handle 18 million passengers by 2010-11 & 70 million by 2034-35 Movement primarily through taxis & private vehicles. Bus services were few & inadequate Travel time from center of Delhi to IGAI approx 1 Hr CWG was likely to bring in a large number of tourists & sports participants
  • 12.
    Terms of Reference AirportExpress line  September 2010 deadline for CWG Direct Route to IGAI , ride with most people sitting with space for luggage Max speed of 135 kms/hr with operating speeds of 100 Kms/hr Four stn reqd: Two stns close to City Centre, One stn Intermediate & One stn at airport terminal Provision for interchanges with DMRC lines & other public transport systems Provision for future stations Decision between DMRC & PPP/BOT
  • 13.
    Stakeholders Airport Express line GoI-Empowered Gp of Min, Committee of Secretaries GNCTD (Govt of National Capital Territory of Delhi) DMRC DIAL(Delhi International Airport Limited) Private Finance/ Banks Agencies/Departments according various clearances Residents of Delhi
  • 14.
    Project Details Airport ExpressLine  Project Length 19.2 Km with a hybrid mix: - l5.5 Km of underground tracks - 11.6 Km of elevated tracks - Remaining would be for switch-over ramps Expected traffic 86,000 by 2021 Turn-around time of 55-60 min Express line would terminate at the Airport Each station would have a circulating area of 10,000-20,000 SqM of which 50% could be used for commercial purposes Cost of Proj- 2381Cr (less the taxes & duties)
  • 15.
    Concerns Airport Express Line Alignmentof the line at places like cantonment areas where permission would be mandatory for elevated corridors Alignment crossed major city roads affecting utilities like sewers, water mains, storm water drains, telephone & electricity lines. These were not to be disrupted during the construction phase Felling of 300-400 trees Permission from different regulators & utility operators DIAL had reservations on elevated station on Airport Security of the line Ambitious time frame of four years
  • 16.
    Options DMRC vs PPP Funding from the GoI for a facility to be primarily used by air passengers may not be forthcoming DMRC had to secure entire funding DIAL to bear expenses for civil works inside airport to the tune of 440 Cr DDA would be required to pitch in for better connectivity to Dwarka Responsibility of the project with private investor  Heavy capital investment & long gestation periods BOT projects involved 1/3rd equity & 2/3rd debt @ 10% Private funding may have to be extended through VGF (viability gap funding) DMRC PPP/BOT Funding
  • 17.
    Options DMRC vs PPP DMRC/GNCTD to be responsible for land acquisitions, securing permission from different agencies for both construction & operations  Form 1 Private investor to be responsible for land acquisition & all clearances  Form 2 Land Acquisition & clearances facilitated by DMRC/GNCTD DMRC PPP/BOT Permissions & Clearances
  • 18.
    Options DMRC vs PPP DMRC has domain expertise, momentum from past & running projects & trained manpower Good offices with GoI, GNCTD & agencies according permissions/clearances Vital engineering equipment like heavy duty cranes & plant equipment already available on site Rolling stock from previously completed projects Knowledge of existing facilities like electricity & sewer lines, water supply lines  Tried & tested team with excellent reasults  Very few private companies with this kind of an expertise May have to poach experts from DMRC itself for critical functions May have to further subcontract indl segments Procurement of heavy engineering eqpt may delay commencement of the project Lack of trained manpower No knowledge of layout of amenities Good offices have to be established through liaison with all agencies DMRC PPP/BOTExecution & Operation
  • 19.
    Suggested Road Ahead AirportExpress Line  A lot is at stake on the project (National image) Contract procedure followed by subcontracting, is a time consuming process Critical amenities cannot be disturbed for a prolonged period Environmental, Forest & other clearances have to be fast-tracked Procurement of Engineering Eqpt & construction stores at a very rapid pace has its challenges Quality control on the project when time lines are critical  Availability of Trained Manpower at all levels Good leadership Good Offices with various agencies
  • 20.
    Suggested Road Ahead AirportExpress Line  DMRC is best suited to undertake the project  Involving any other agency without domain expertise may prove disastrous with such critical timelines If funding is an issue with GoI & PPP/BOT becomes the only option, then supervision & reporting on a daily basis may have to be done by DMRC  Instructions from GOI to all agencies to issue clearances on a war footing
  • 21.