This document is Vijayananda D Mohire's assignment submission for his Master of Technology in Information Technology degree from Karnataka State Open University in India. It contains two questions regarding computer architecture. Question 1 asks about memory hierarchy and explains the different levels from fastest to slowest. Question 2 explains Flynn's taxonomy of computer architectures, which classifies systems based on whether they have single/multiple instruction and data streams. The classifications are SISD, SIMD, MISD, and MIMD.
The growing rate of technology improvements has caused dramatic advances in processor performances,
causing significant speed-up of processor working frequency and increased amount of instructions which
can be processed in parallel. The given development of processor's technology has brought performance
improvements in computer systems, but not for all the types of applications. The reason for this resides in
the well known Von-Neumann bottleneck problem which occurs during the communication between the
processor and the main memory into a standard processor-centric system. This problem has been reviewed
by many scientists, which proposed different approaches for improving the memory bandwidth and latency.
This paper provides a brief review of these techniques and also gives a deep analysis of various memory-
centric systems that implement different approaches of merging or placing the memory near to the
processing elements. Within this analysis we discuss the advantages, disadvantages and the application
(purpose) of several well-known memory-centric systems.
The growing rate of technology improvements has caused dramatic advances in processor performances,
causing significant speed-up of processor working frequency and increased amount of instructions which
can be processed in parallel. The given development of processor's technology has brought performance
improvements in computer systems, but not for all the types of applications. The reason for this resides in
the well known Von-Neumann bottleneck problem which occurs during the communication between the
processor and the main memory into a standard processor-centric system. This problem has been reviewed
by many scientists, which proposed different approaches for improving the memory bandwidth and latency.
This paper provides a brief review of these techniques and also gives a deep analysis of various memory-
centric systems that implement different approaches of merging or placing the memory near to the
processing elements. Within this analysis we discuss the advantages, disadvantages and the application
(purpose) of several well-known memory-centric systems.
The growing rate of technology improvements has caused dramatic advances in processor performances, causing significant speed-up of processor working frequency and increased amount of instructions which can be processed in parallel. The given development of processor's technology has brought performance improvements in computer systems, but not for all the types of applications. The reason for this resides in the well known Von-Neumann bottleneck problem which occurs during the communication between the processor and the main memory into a standard processor-centric system. This problem has been reviewed by many scientists, which proposed different approaches for improving the memory bandwidth and latency. This paper provides a brief review of these techniques and also gives a deep analysis of various memorycentric systems that implement different approaches of merging or placing the memory near to the processing elements. Within this analysis we discuss the advantages, disadvantages and the application (purpose) of several well-known memory-centric systems
151 A SURVEY OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES FOR OVERCOMING THE PROCESSOR-MEMORY BOTT...ijcsit
Â
The growing rate of technology improvements has caused dramatic advances in processor performances, causing significant speed-up of processor working frequency and increased amount of instructions which can be processed in parallel. The given development of processor's technology has brought performance
improvements in computer systems, but not for all the types of applications. The reason for this resides in the well known Von-Neumann bottleneck problem which occurs during the communication between the processor and the main memory into a standard processor-centric system. This problem has been reviewed by many scientists, which proposed different approaches for improving the memory bandwidth and latency.
This paper provides a brief review of these techniques and also gives a deep analysis of various memorycentric
systems that implement different approaches of merging or placing the memory near to the processing elements. Within this analysis we discuss the advantages, disadvantages and the application (purpose) of several well-known memory-centric systems.
Architecture and implementation issues of multi core processors and caching â...eSAT Publishing House
Â
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology
The growing rate of technology improvements has caused dramatic advances in processor performances,
causing significant speed-up of processor working frequency and increased amount of instructions which
can be processed in parallel. The given development of processor's technology has brought performance
improvements in computer systems, but not for all the types of applications. The reason for this resides in
the well known Von-Neumann bottleneck problem which occurs during the communication between the
processor and the main memory into a standard processor-centric system. This problem has been reviewed
by many scientists, which proposed different approaches for improving the memory bandwidth and latency.
This paper provides a brief review of these techniques and also gives a deep analysis of various memory-
centric systems that implement different approaches of merging or placing the memory near to the
processing elements. Within this analysis we discuss the advantages, disadvantages and the application
(purpose) of several well-known memory-centric systems.
The growing rate of technology improvements has caused dramatic advances in processor performances,
causing significant speed-up of processor working frequency and increased amount of instructions which
can be processed in parallel. The given development of processor's technology has brought performance
improvements in computer systems, but not for all the types of applications. The reason for this resides in
the well known Von-Neumann bottleneck problem which occurs during the communication between the
processor and the main memory into a standard processor-centric system. This problem has been reviewed
by many scientists, which proposed different approaches for improving the memory bandwidth and latency.
This paper provides a brief review of these techniques and also gives a deep analysis of various memory-
centric systems that implement different approaches of merging or placing the memory near to the
processing elements. Within this analysis we discuss the advantages, disadvantages and the application
(purpose) of several well-known memory-centric systems.
The growing rate of technology improvements has caused dramatic advances in processor performances, causing significant speed-up of processor working frequency and increased amount of instructions which can be processed in parallel. The given development of processor's technology has brought performance improvements in computer systems, but not for all the types of applications. The reason for this resides in the well known Von-Neumann bottleneck problem which occurs during the communication between the processor and the main memory into a standard processor-centric system. This problem has been reviewed by many scientists, which proposed different approaches for improving the memory bandwidth and latency. This paper provides a brief review of these techniques and also gives a deep analysis of various memorycentric systems that implement different approaches of merging or placing the memory near to the processing elements. Within this analysis we discuss the advantages, disadvantages and the application (purpose) of several well-known memory-centric systems
151 A SURVEY OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES FOR OVERCOMING THE PROCESSOR-MEMORY BOTT...ijcsit
Â
The growing rate of technology improvements has caused dramatic advances in processor performances, causing significant speed-up of processor working frequency and increased amount of instructions which can be processed in parallel. The given development of processor's technology has brought performance
improvements in computer systems, but not for all the types of applications. The reason for this resides in the well known Von-Neumann bottleneck problem which occurs during the communication between the processor and the main memory into a standard processor-centric system. This problem has been reviewed by many scientists, which proposed different approaches for improving the memory bandwidth and latency.
This paper provides a brief review of these techniques and also gives a deep analysis of various memorycentric
systems that implement different approaches of merging or placing the memory near to the processing elements. Within this analysis we discuss the advantages, disadvantages and the application (purpose) of several well-known memory-centric systems.
Architecture and implementation issues of multi core processors and caching â...eSAT Publishing House
Â
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
Â
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasnât one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Â
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
⢠The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
⢠The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate âany matterâ at âany timeâ under House Rule X.
⢠The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
Â
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Â
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
Â
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesarâs dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empireâs birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empireâs society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
1. Advanced Computer Architecture
(Assignment âII)
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Technology in Information Technology
Master of Technology in Information Technology
Master of Technology in Information Technology
Master of Technology in Information Technology
by
Vijayananda D Mohire
(Enrolment No.921DMTE0113)
Information Technology Department
Karnataka State Open University
Manasagangotri, Mysore â 570006
Karnataka, India
(2009)
3. MT-12-II
CERTIFICATE
CERTIFICATE
CERTIFICATE
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Assignment-II entitled (Advanced Computer
Architecture, subject code: MT12) submitted by Vijayananda D Mohire
having Roll Number 921DMTE0113 for the partial fulfilment of the
requirements of Master of Technology in Information Technology degree
of Karnataka State Open University, Mysore, embodies the bonafide
work done by him under my supervision.
Place: ________________
Place: ________________
Place: ________________
Place: ________________ Signature of the Internal Supervisor
Signature of the Internal Supervisor
Signature of the Internal Supervisor
Signature of the Internal Supervisor
Name
Name
Name
Name
Date: ________________
Date: ________________
Date: ________________
Date: ________________ Designation
Designation
Designation
Designation
4. MT-12-II
For Evaluation
For Evaluation
For Evaluation
For Evaluation
Question
Question
Question
Question
Number
Number
Number
Number
Maximum Marks
Maximum Marks
Maximum Marks
Maximum Marks Marks
Marks
Marks
Marks
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
Comments,
Comments,
Comments,
Comments, if any
if any
if any
if any
1 5
2 5
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL 10
Evaluatorâs Name and Signature Date
5. MT-12-II
Preface
Preface
Preface
Preface
This document has been prepared specially for the assignments of M.Tech â IT I
Semester. This is mainly intended for evaluation of assignment of the academic
M.Tech - IT, I semester. I have made a sincere attempt to gather and study the best
answers to the assignment questions and have attempted the responses to the
questions. I am confident that the evaluatorâs will find this submission informative
and evaluate based on the provide content.
For clarity and ease of use there is a Table of contents and Evaluators section to
make easier navigation and recording of the marks. A list of references has been
provided in the last page â Bibliography that provides the source of information both
internal and external. Evaluatorâs are welcome to provide the necessary comments
against each response, suitable space has been provided at the end of each
response.
I am grateful to the Infysys academy, Koramangala, Bangalore in making this a big
success. Many thanks for the timely help and attention in making this possible within
specified timeframe. Special thanks to Mr. Vivek and Mr. Prakash for their timely
help and guidance.
Candidateâs Name and Signature Date
6. MT-12-II
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
F
F
F
FOR
OR
OR
OR E
E
E
EVALUATION
VALUATION
VALUATION
VALUATION
P
P
P
PREFACE
REFACE
REFACE
REFACE
Q
Q
Q
QUESTION
UESTION
UESTION
UESTION 1
1
1
1
A
A
A
ANSWER
NSWER
NSWER
NSWER 1
1
1
1
Q
Q
Q
QUESTION
UESTION
UESTION
UESTION 2
2
2
2
A
A
A
ANSWER
NSWER
NSWER
NSWER 2
2
2
2
7. MT-12-II
Table of Figures
Table of Figures
Table of Figures
Table of Figures
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1 Memory Hierarchy
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2 Levels of Memory (Hyde, 2008)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3 Computer classifications defined by Flynn (Anonymous, Flynn's_taxonomy, 2009)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4 Pictorials of Flynnâs Taxonomy (Anonymous, Flynn's_taxonomy, 2009)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 5 Refined Flynn's taxonomy
9. MT-12-II
Question 1
Question 1
Question 1
Question 1 What is memory hierarchy? Explain the different levels of memory
hierarchy?
Answer 1
Answer 1
Answer 1
Answer 1
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure 1
1
1
1 Memory Hierarchy
A ranking of computer memory devices, with devices having the fastest access
time at the top of the hierarchy, and devices with slower access times but larger
capacity and lower cost at lower levels.
We classify memory based on its "distance" from the processor, with distance
10. MT-12-II
measured by the number of machine cycles required for access. The closer
memory is to the processor, the faster it should be. As memory gets further from
the main processor, we can afford longer access times. Thus, slower technologies
are used for these memories, and faster technologies are used for memories
closer to the CPU. The better the technology, the faster and more expensive the
memory becomes. Thus, faster memories tend to be smaller than slower ones,
due to cost.
Memory hierarchy refers to a CPU-centric latency (delay)âthe primary criterion
for designing a placement in storage in a memory hierarchyâthat fits the storage
device into the design considerations concerning the operators of the computer. It
is used only incidentally in operations, artifactually. It's primary use is in thinking
about an abstract machines.
The levels of memory in a computer (Hyde, 2008). From fastest to slowest speed,
they are:
1. CPU registers
2. L1 cache
3. L2 cache
4. Main memory
5. Virtual memory
11. 6. Disk
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure 2
2
2
2 Levels of Memor
At the top level of the mem
The registers provide the
register file is also the sm
eight general purpose reg
impossible to add more
expensive memory locati
other CPU registers in this
the fact that there are a v
quite high (figuring the co
available).
ory (Hyde, 2008)
emory hierarchy are the CPU's general pu
e fastest access to data possible on the 8
mallest memory object in the memory hie
registers available). By virtue of the fact th
re registers to the 80x86, registers are
ations. Note that we can include FPU, MM
his class as well. These additional registers
very limited number of registers and the
cost of the CPU divided by the number of b
MT-12-II
purpose registers.
80x86 CPU. The
ierarchy (with just
t that it is virtually
re also the most
MMX, SIMD, and
ers do not change
e cost per byte is
f bytes of register
12. MT-12-II
Working our way down, the Level One Cache system is the next highest
performance subsystem in the memory hierarchy. On the 80x86 CPUs, the Level
One Cache is provided on-chip by Intel and cannot be expanded. The size is
usually quite small (typically between 4Kbytes and 32Kbytes), though much larger
than the registers available on the CPU chip. Although the Level One Cache size
is fixed on the CPU and you cannot expand it, the cost per byte of cache memory
is much lower than that of the registers because the cache contains far more
storage than is available in all the combined registers.
The Level Two Cache is present on some CPUs, on other CPUs it is the system
designer's task to incorporate this cache (if it is present at all). For example, most
Pentium II, III, and IV CPUs have a level two cache as part of the CPU package,
but many of Intel's Celeron chips do not1. The Level Two Cache is generally much
larger than the level one cache (e.g., 256 or 512KBytes versus 16 Kilobytes). On
CPUs where Intel includes the Level Two Cache as part of the CPU package, the
cache is not expandable. It is still lower cost than the Level One Cache because
we amortize the cost of the CPU across all the bytes in the Level Two Cache. On
systems where the Level Two Cache is external, many system designers let the
end user select the cache size and upgrade the size. For economic reasons,
external caches are actually more expensive than caches that are part of the CPU
13. MT-12-II
package, but the cost per bit at the transistor level is still equivalent to the in-
package caches.
Below the Level Two Cache system in the memory hierarchy falls the main
memory subsystem. This is the general-purpose, relatively low-cost memory
found in most computer systems. Typically, this is DRAM or some similar
inexpensive memory technology.
Below main memory is the NUMA category. NUMA, which stands for NonUniform
Memory Access is a bit of a misnomer here. NUMA means that different types of
memory have different access times. Therefore, the term NUMA is fairly
descriptive of the entire memory hierarchy. In Fig.2, however, we'll use the term
NUMA to describe blocks of memory that are electronically similar to main
memory but for one reason or another operate significantly slower than main
memory. A good example is the memory on a video display card. Access to
memory on video display cards is often much slower than access to main
memory. Other peripheral devices that provide a block of shared memory
between the CPU and the peripheral probably have similar access times as this
video card example. Another example of NUMA includes certain slower memory
technologies like Flash Memory that have significant slower access and transfers
times than standard semiconductor RAM. We'll use the term NUMA in this chapter
14. MT-12-II
to describe these blocks of memory that look like main memory but run at slower
speeds.
Most modern computer systems implement a Virtual Memory scheme that lets
them simulate main memory using storage on a disk drive. While disks are
significantly slower than main memory, the cost per bit is also significantly lower.
Therefore, it is far less expensive (by three orders of magnitude) to keep some
data on magnetic storage rather than in main memory. A Virtual Memory
subsystem is responsible for transparently copying data between the disk and
main memory as needed by a program.
File Storage also uses disk media to store program data. However, it is the
program's responsibility to store and retrieve file data. In many instances, this is a
bit slower than using Virtual Memory, hence the lower position in the memory
hierarchy.
Below File Storage in the memory hierarchy comes Network Storage. At this level
a program is keeping data on a different system that connects the program's
system via a network. With Network Storage you can implement Virtual Memory,
File Storage, and a system known as Distributed Shared Memory (where
processes running on different computer systems share data in a common block
15. MT-12-II
of memory and communicate changes to that block across the network).
Virtual Memory, File Storage, and Network Storage are examples of so-called on-
line memory subsystems. Memory access via these mechanism is slower than
main memory access, but when a program requests data from one of these
memory devices, the device is ready and able to respond to the request as quickly
as is physically possible. This is not true for the remaining levels in the memory
hierarchy.
The Near-Line and Off-Line Storage subsystems are not immediately ready to
respond to a program's request for data. An Off-Line Storage system keeps its
data in electronic form (usually magnetic or optical) but on media that is not
(necessarily) connected to the computer system while the program that needs the
data is running. Examples of Off-Line Storage include magnetic tapes, disk
cartridges, optical disks, and floppy diskettes. When a program needs data from
an off-line medium, the program must stop and wait for a someone or something
to mount the appropriate media on the computer system. This delay can be quite
long (perhaps the computer operator decided to take a coffee break?). Near-Line
Storage uses the same media as Off-Line Storage, the difference is that the
system holds the media in a special robotic jukebox device that can automatically
mount the desired media when some program requests it. Tapes and removable
16. MT-12-II
media are among the most inexpensive electronic data storage formats available.
Hence, these media are great for storing large amounts of data for long time
periods.
Hard Copy storage is simply a print-out (in one form or another) of some data. If a
program requests some data and that data is present only in hard copy form,
someone will have to manually enter the data into the computer. Paper (or other
hard copy media) is probably the least expensive form of memory, at least for
certain data types.
Evaluatorâs Comments if any:
Question 2
Question 2
Question 2
Question 2 Explain the different Flynnâs Taxonomy of computer architecture
Answer 2
Answer 2
Answer 2
Answer 2
Over the years, several attempts have been made to find a satisfactory way to
categorize computer architectures. Although none of them are perfect, today's
17. MT-12-II
most widely accepted taxonomy is the one proposed by Michael Flynn in
1972. Flynn's taxonomy considers two factors: the number of instructions and
the number of data streams that flow into the processor. A machine can have
either one or multiple streams of data, and can have either one or multiple
processors working on this data. This gives us four possible combinations:
SISD (single instruction stream, single data stream), SIMD (single instruction
stream, multiple data streams), MISD (multiple instruction streams, single
data stream), and MIMD (multiple instruction streams, multiple data streams).
(Anonymous, Flynn's_taxonomy, 2009)
Single
Single
Single
Single
Instruction
Instruction
Instruction
Instruction
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Instruction
Instruction
Instruction
Instruction
Single
Single
Single
Single
Data
Data
Data
Data
SISD MISD
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Data
Data
Data
Data
SIMD MIMD
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure 3
3
3
3 Computer classifications defined by Flynn (Anonymous,
Flynn's_taxonomy, 2009)
The four classifications defined by Flynn are based upon the number of
concurrent instruction (or control) and data streams available in the
architecture:
18. MT-12-II
Single Instruction, Single Data stream (SISD)
A sequential computer which exploits no parallelism in either the
instruction or data streams. Examples of SISD architecture are the
traditional uniprocessor machines like a PC or old mainframes.
Single Instruction, Multiple Data streams (SIMD)
A computer which exploits multiple data streams against a single
instruction stream to perform operations which may be naturally
parallelized. For example, an array processor or GPU.
Multiple Instruction, Single Data stream (MISD)
Multiple instructions operate on a single data stream. Uncommon
architecture which is generally used for fault tolerance. Heterogeneous
systems operate on the same data stream and must agree on the
result. Examples include the Space Shuttle flight control computer.
Multiple Instruction, Multiple Data streams (MIMD)
Multiple autonomous processors simultaneously executing different
instructions on different data. Distributed systems are generally
recognized to be MIMD architectures; either exploiting a single shared
memory space or a distributed memory space.
19. Visually, these four arc
processing unit:
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure 4
4
4
4 Pictorials of
2009)
At a level above where
characteristic, and tha
driven. The classic
processor activities ar
instructions act on the
opposite. The characte
architectures are shown below where each
SISD
SISD
SISD
SISD MISD
MISD
MISD
MISD
SIMD
IMD
SIMD
IMD MIMD
MIMD
MIMD
MIMD
f Flynnâs Taxonomy (Anonymous, Flynn's_
ere Flynn begins his taxonomy, we need to
hat is whether the architecture is instruction
von Neumann architecture is instruct
are determined by a sequence of program
he data. Data driven, or dataflow, architect
cteristics of the data determine the sequen
MT-12-II
ch "PU" is a
's_taxonomy,
to add one more
ion driven or data
ction driven. All
m code. Program
ctures do just the
ence of processor
20. MT-12-II
events.
With the addition of dataflow computers and some refinements to the MIMD
classification, we obtain the taxonomy shown below .
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure 5
5
5
5 Refined Flynn's taxonomy
Evaluatorâs Comments if any: