7. evaluation(4)
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•5 views
The document provides an evaluation of Louis Cooper's audio production process for a podcast. It summarizes the key parts of the process, including research on podcast topics, planning through writing a rough script, time management to complete tasks on schedule, technical qualities similar to other podcasts but focusing on fishing, positive aural qualities and enjoyment of the creative process. Feedback indicated liking the vast fish knowledge but needing better audio quality and having more open and local fishing discussions. Louis agrees audio could be improved and discussions focused more on UK and local fishing for the target audience.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides an evaluation of a podcast production project. It discusses strengths and weaknesses in the research, planning, and time management phases. It notes that listening to other podcasts helped but also revealed competition. Planning different audio styles was useful but some elements took longer than expected. Time was managed well by completing the project in two days, though editing took significant time due to censorship. The podcast sounded good despite being one take but censorship beeps could be improved. The informal style and sharing of opinions was appealing to the target audience. Peer feedback praised the casual discussion but noted some content was misleading and audio quality could be better. The producer agreed some content needed clarifying and would improve censorship sounds and length.
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides a self-evaluation by Harry Allinson of a podcast production project. It covers research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback received. Key points include that research helped make the podcast more informative, planning improved the final product, time management issues affected quality, and peer feedback suggested making the podcast longer and improving audio quality.
7. evaluation(4) (1)
The student conducted research to develop an "escape" podcast for women ages 15-19. This included investigating different podcasts, music, and apps. Planning involved scripting and scheduling recordings. Time management was good but some aspects like music selection felt rushed. Technical quality was high with studio recording and editing. Audio quality was generally good but could have been clearer. Feedback praised the pacing and topics but suggested shortening the introduction and finer editing. The student agreed improvements could be made to editing and length.
Audio Project - Evaluation
The document summarizes an evaluation of a podcast production project. It discusses strengths and weaknesses in the areas of research, planning, time management, technical qualities, and aural qualities. Peer feedback suggested improving audio quality and adding more content or topics. The producer agreed content should be longer but disagreed that background music was distracting.
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides an evaluation of an FMP project involving the production of a podcast. It summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of the research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback stages. For research, strengths included learning podcast conventions while weaknesses centered around limited examples. For planning, strengths were developing ideas but weaknesses included limited time. Time management was well-executed. Technical qualities differed from examples while similarities existed. The podcast was evaluated as unique but not very creative. Peer feedback suggested making the podcast longer and adding more information.
8. evaluation (lf) audio
The document summarizes the production process of a podcast. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the creator's research, planning, time management, target audience appeal, technical qualities, aural qualities, and feedback received. Key strengths included an entertaining subject, humor, well-edited sound effects, and an easy listening format. Suggested improvements were to add more varied music and sound effects throughout and better edit out overlapping speech.
8. evaluation (jrw) audio
The document summarizes the production process of a podcast about basketball. It discusses researching existing podcasts and effects to use. A mind map helped determine the topic. Time was managed well. The podcast appealed to its target audience of teenagers and young adults using relevant music and a focus on star players. Peer feedback praised the music and sound effects but suggested adding more music and effects. The producer agreed more effects could be used but not music throughout for clarity.
7. evaluation
The document provides a summary of the student's podcast production process evaluation. Some key points:
- The student's research helped them decide on doing a podcast format and influenced elements like adding sound effects. However, only researching similar genres limited new ideas.
- Planning strengths included choosing a style but weaknesses were not fully thinking through elements.
- Time management was an issue as the deadline caused rushing. Audio quality suffered from using a handheld recorder.
- Peer feedback noted issues with monotone delivery, inconsistent audio levels, and abrupt starting/stopping of background music. The student agrees improvements in these areas would enhance the podcast.
Recommended
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides an evaluation of a podcast production project. It discusses strengths and weaknesses in the research, planning, and time management phases. It notes that listening to other podcasts helped but also revealed competition. Planning different audio styles was useful but some elements took longer than expected. Time was managed well by completing the project in two days, though editing took significant time due to censorship. The podcast sounded good despite being one take but censorship beeps could be improved. The informal style and sharing of opinions was appealing to the target audience. Peer feedback praised the casual discussion but noted some content was misleading and audio quality could be better. The producer agreed some content needed clarifying and would improve censorship sounds and length.
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides a self-evaluation by Harry Allinson of a podcast production project. It covers research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback received. Key points include that research helped make the podcast more informative, planning improved the final product, time management issues affected quality, and peer feedback suggested making the podcast longer and improving audio quality.
7. evaluation(4) (1)
The student conducted research to develop an "escape" podcast for women ages 15-19. This included investigating different podcasts, music, and apps. Planning involved scripting and scheduling recordings. Time management was good but some aspects like music selection felt rushed. Technical quality was high with studio recording and editing. Audio quality was generally good but could have been clearer. Feedback praised the pacing and topics but suggested shortening the introduction and finer editing. The student agreed improvements could be made to editing and length.
Audio Project - Evaluation
The document summarizes an evaluation of a podcast production project. It discusses strengths and weaknesses in the areas of research, planning, time management, technical qualities, and aural qualities. Peer feedback suggested improving audio quality and adding more content or topics. The producer agreed content should be longer but disagreed that background music was distracting.
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides an evaluation of an FMP project involving the production of a podcast. It summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of the research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback stages. For research, strengths included learning podcast conventions while weaknesses centered around limited examples. For planning, strengths were developing ideas but weaknesses included limited time. Time management was well-executed. Technical qualities differed from examples while similarities existed. The podcast was evaluated as unique but not very creative. Peer feedback suggested making the podcast longer and adding more information.
8. evaluation (lf) audio
The document summarizes the production process of a podcast. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the creator's research, planning, time management, target audience appeal, technical qualities, aural qualities, and feedback received. Key strengths included an entertaining subject, humor, well-edited sound effects, and an easy listening format. Suggested improvements were to add more varied music and sound effects throughout and better edit out overlapping speech.
8. evaluation (jrw) audio
The document summarizes the production process of a podcast about basketball. It discusses researching existing podcasts and effects to use. A mind map helped determine the topic. Time was managed well. The podcast appealed to its target audience of teenagers and young adults using relevant music and a focus on star players. Peer feedback praised the music and sound effects but suggested adding more music and effects. The producer agreed more effects could be used but not music throughout for clarity.
7. evaluation
The document provides a summary of the student's podcast production process evaluation. Some key points:
- The student's research helped them decide on doing a podcast format and influenced elements like adding sound effects. However, only researching similar genres limited new ideas.
- Planning strengths included choosing a style but weaknesses were not fully thinking through elements.
- Time management was an issue as the deadline caused rushing. Audio quality suffered from using a handheld recorder.
- Peer feedback noted issues with monotone delivery, inconsistent audio levels, and abrupt starting/stopping of background music. The student agrees improvements in these areas would enhance the podcast.
6.7 evaluation copy
The document summarizes the process of creating an audio book, including research on existing products, planning with mind mapping and scheduling, using background music and sound effects, and receiving peer feedback. Research involved examining 3 products to avoid plagiarism and understand what to include. Planning included generating ideas, finding sound effects and music, and scheduling. Time management required sticking to a schedule. Technical qualities utilized background music and sound effects to create tension. Peer feedback praised the production quality and use of music/effects but suggested clarifying the story and controlling sound effect volumes.
7. evaluation(4)
Harrison Lincoln completed an audio evaluation project involving voice impressions. His research provided ideas and comedy but finding relevant examples was difficult. Planning drew from existing sketches but he worried about copyright. He managed his time well according to a schedule. Technically, his work was similar to other audio sketches. Audio quality improved after re-recording but switching voices strained his throat. He appealed to his target audience with familiar scenarios and voices. Peer feedback praised the comedic timing but noted gaps between voices and inconsistent volume. Harrison agreed volume could be improved and disagreed that it was too loud.
7. evaluation(4)
The document summarizes a student's podcast project about the Nintendo game Fire Emblem: Three Houses. It includes sections on research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback. The research was easy to conduct using YouTube podcasts about Nintendo games. Planning involved mind maps and downloading sound effects. Time management involved breaking work into chunks. Peer feedback suggested speaking slower and adding more character quotes.
7. evaluation audio
The document summarizes an evaluation of an audio podcast project. It includes sections on research, planning, time management, target audience, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback. For research, the strengths were knowing where to look, but weaknesses included occasionally copying verbatim. Planning helped generate ideas and know the desired outcome. Time was managed well and extra time used for review. The target audience was mostly males interested in cars and films. There were difficulties with fading music and adjusting sound effect volumes. Peer feedback noted the good background music, topic, and recordings, but improvements could be making the ending more conclusive.
7. evaluation
The document provides a summary and evaluation of Josh Bailey's podcast production project. Some key points:
- Josh's research helped him understand common elements of popular podcasts to include in his own, like intro music, scripts, topics, and target audience. However, his podcast had a much smaller budget and resources.
- Planning went well initially but coordinating recording times with guests was more difficult than expected.
- Peer feedback noted the hosts' energy but also identified issues like a squeaking sound and need to mix audio levels better. Josh agrees the introduction could be improved.
- Overall Josh feels the podcast could have been edited more and he should have implemented suggestions to mix audio and add an outro.
City Lore Interviewing guide
This document provides guidance on conducting interviews, including preparing questions, listening skills, asking open and closed-ended questions, documenting the interview, and analyzing the collected information. Key steps include preparing a list of topics and questions in advance, conducting a practice interview to test equipment, asking follow-up questions to probe for details, taking thorough notes during the interview, and reviewing notes to identify themes and questions that need clarification. The document emphasizes making the interview feel like a conversation and carefully listening without interruption to elicit rich responses.
Group Discussion and Presentation
The document provides guidance on group discussions and presentations. It discusses types of group discussions, selecting discussion topics, dos and don'ts of participating. Some key points include:
- There are different types of group discussions including normal, case study, and role play formats. When selecting a topic, it should be general enough for all to speak on, relevant to current situations, and allow for at least two perspectives.
- When beginning a discussion, only speak if you have sensible things to say to avoid being seen as unprepared or misleading the group. When concluding, summarize all viewpoints and do not force consensus.
- Proper preparation is key for successful presentations. Presenters should understand their audience and tail
Getting better at ppts
The document discusses tips for improving presentations. It recommends keeping presentations concise by avoiding excessive text on slides and focusing on the most relevant points. Visuals like charts and images should be used to enhance the message. Consistency in themes, fonts and spelling is important. When giving presentations, preparation is key and the audience's engagement should be ensured through storytelling, a strong start and conclusion that recaps the main ideas. Maintaining the audience's attention and clearly communicating the most important messages are also emphasized.
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides a summary and evaluation of an FMP project involving the production of a podcast. It discusses the research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, and audience appeal of the podcast project. The research section notes the podcasts researched and how mind maps were used to understand what makes them appealing. Planning involved listening to chosen podcasts and identifying elements to include. Time management and use of equipment could be improved. Peer feedback praised the relaxed delivery but suggested improving audio quality and adding examples or guests.
You are not Listening at UXSEA Summit 2018
This is the presentation deck from UX Conference session by Ben Bowes of Pivotal Labs Singapore as a part of UXSEA Summit 2018 in Singapore. UXSEA Summit 2018 was held from 18th to 20th November, 2018. For more information about UXSEA Society, visit https://uxsea.org/
The copyright of this material is with those who created this presentation material. Please take permissions from the authors if you are in doubt about copyright infringement.
7. evaluation(4)
The student conducted research on stories to find one to adapt for an audio book recording. Their research provided ideas for the story and format but lacked detail. Planning helped determine using an audio book format with sound effects. Time management allowed completing the project on time, but more time could have improved editing and shortening. Feedback noted the fitting use of sound effects and music but a slow start. The student agrees the start was slow and actor occasionally misread lines, and would rerecord lines and shorten the beginning if repeating the project.
Day Four qualitative workshop
The document provides guidance on conducting focus group discussions (FGDs). It outlines the key steps in conducting FGDs which include recruiting 8-10 participants with similar backgrounds, arranging the venue to encourage interaction, conducting the session, and writing up and analyzing the results. For each step, details are provided on the roles of the facilitator and recorder, with tips on facilitating discussion, taking notes, and translating/transcribing the discussions. Common mistakes in note taking and expanding notes are also discussed. The document emphasizes capturing participants' verbatim words and perspectives.
7. evaluation(4) (1) (1)
This document summarizes Reed Cunningham's evaluation of a film review production project. It describes the research, planning, and time management that went into the project. It then evaluates the aural qualities of the audio review, intended audience, and peer feedback. The peer feedback noted the clear voice but some pauses in speech, and suggested rehearsing more and adding more sound effects. Reed agrees rehearsing more would have improved the flow but disagrees that more sound effects were needed. The summary identifies areas for improvement as rehearsing the script more to reduce pauses and potentially adding some sound effects.
Interview Tips
The document provides tips for conducting interviews: be prepared by researching beforehand and testing equipment; be respectful by being on time, showing interest, discussing goals and plans, and thanking the participant; be yourself by relaxing and treating it like a conversation; use good techniques like having an introduction, body, and conclusion, asking follow-up questions, and reducing distractions.
TIPS FOR A GOOD LISTENER AND BARRIERS OF LISTENIG SKILLS
The document discusses various barriers to effective listening, including physical, people-related, physiological, and psychological barriers. Physical barriers include noise, poor acoustics, interruptions, and uncomfortable environments. Physiological barriers are factors like health issues, disabilities, and a wandering attention that make it difficult to focus. Psychological barriers consist of doubts about the speaker, personal anxieties, attitudes like egoism, impatience, and emotional blocks against new ideas. Strategies are provided for overcoming these barriers through focused attention, not interrupting, listening fully before responding, understanding main ideas, asking questions, and providing feedback.
Public speaking
Here are 3 types of speeches with brief descriptions:
1. Informative speech: The purpose is to educate or inform the audience on a particular topic. Facts and explanations are provided objectively without taking a position.
2. Persuasive speech: The goal is to convince the audience to accept a particular position or viewpoint on a debatable topic. Logical arguments and evidence are used to persuade the listeners.
3. Demonstrative speech: The objective is to demonstrate how to do something through clear step-by-step explanations and visual aids if needed. The focus is on showing the audience how rather than just telling them.
The main modes of speech delivery are:
1. Extemporaneous: The
Public Speaking
1. Research your audience to understand their needs, concerns, and objections so you can address them specifically in your speech.
2. Identify the goals and objectives of your audience so you can show how your speech will help them achieve their goals.
3. Consider demographics of your audience like size, knowledge level, attitudes, ages, genders, and cultural factors so you can tailor your speech appropriately.
Moderator Helpful Tips
The document provides tips for moderating a panel discussion. It lists dos and don'ts for moderators. Key responsibilities for moderators include preparing in advance by researching panelists, customizing the discussion format and content, and ensuring panelists turn in materials on time. Moderators should meet with panelists before the event to review goals and discuss time limits. During the event, moderators should engage both the panelists and audience, follow time limits, and ensure the panelists are the main focus while providing a good experience for all.
Extempore tips
- Prepare for an extempore speech by jotting down ideas and vocabulary related to the topic. Maintain confidence and a positive body language.
- Speak clearly at a steady pace on the assigned topic without faking accents or imitating others. Use appropriate vocabulary.
- If you draw a blank, pretend to pause purposefully. Ask the audience questions or request water to buy time to think, but be honest if unable to recall your thoughts.
7. Evaluation(4) (2).pptx
The document summarizes an evaluation of a podcast production process. It discusses the research, planning, time management, technical and aural qualities, and audience appeal of the podcast. Peer feedback was also provided on what aspects listeners liked and how the podcast could be improved, such as making it longer by discussing additional topics. The evaluation concluded the planning was thorough, time was well managed, the podcast was clearly presented and discussed the intended football topics, and peer feedback was generally positive while suggesting minor improvements like increasing length.
7. evaluation(4) dxd
This document contains a student's self-evaluation of a podcast production project. In the research section, the student notes strengths like familiarity with podcast structure, and weaknesses like not spending enough time on research. For planning, strengths included thorough questions, but weaknesses were too few questions. For time management, strengths were efficiency but weaknesses were rushing. Technical qualities were similar to other genres. Audio strengths were editing skills but weaknesses were a quiet interview compared to loud music. Peer feedback agreed the interview needed more volume and suggested more sound effects. The student agreed the interview should be louder and some sound effects added.
7. evaluation(4) (1)
The document provides a self-evaluation by Harry Allinson of a podcast production project. It covers research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback received. Key points include that research helped make the podcast more informative, planning improved the structure, time management issues impacted completion, and peer feedback suggested making the podcast longer and improving audio quality.
More Related Content
What's hot
6.7 evaluation copy
The document summarizes the process of creating an audio book, including research on existing products, planning with mind mapping and scheduling, using background music and sound effects, and receiving peer feedback. Research involved examining 3 products to avoid plagiarism and understand what to include. Planning included generating ideas, finding sound effects and music, and scheduling. Time management required sticking to a schedule. Technical qualities utilized background music and sound effects to create tension. Peer feedback praised the production quality and use of music/effects but suggested clarifying the story and controlling sound effect volumes.
7. evaluation(4)
Harrison Lincoln completed an audio evaluation project involving voice impressions. His research provided ideas and comedy but finding relevant examples was difficult. Planning drew from existing sketches but he worried about copyright. He managed his time well according to a schedule. Technically, his work was similar to other audio sketches. Audio quality improved after re-recording but switching voices strained his throat. He appealed to his target audience with familiar scenarios and voices. Peer feedback praised the comedic timing but noted gaps between voices and inconsistent volume. Harrison agreed volume could be improved and disagreed that it was too loud.
7. evaluation(4)
The document summarizes a student's podcast project about the Nintendo game Fire Emblem: Three Houses. It includes sections on research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback. The research was easy to conduct using YouTube podcasts about Nintendo games. Planning involved mind maps and downloading sound effects. Time management involved breaking work into chunks. Peer feedback suggested speaking slower and adding more character quotes.
7. evaluation audio
The document summarizes an evaluation of an audio podcast project. It includes sections on research, planning, time management, target audience, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback. For research, the strengths were knowing where to look, but weaknesses included occasionally copying verbatim. Planning helped generate ideas and know the desired outcome. Time was managed well and extra time used for review. The target audience was mostly males interested in cars and films. There were difficulties with fading music and adjusting sound effect volumes. Peer feedback noted the good background music, topic, and recordings, but improvements could be making the ending more conclusive.
7. evaluation
The document provides a summary and evaluation of Josh Bailey's podcast production project. Some key points:
- Josh's research helped him understand common elements of popular podcasts to include in his own, like intro music, scripts, topics, and target audience. However, his podcast had a much smaller budget and resources.
- Planning went well initially but coordinating recording times with guests was more difficult than expected.
- Peer feedback noted the hosts' energy but also identified issues like a squeaking sound and need to mix audio levels better. Josh agrees the introduction could be improved.
- Overall Josh feels the podcast could have been edited more and he should have implemented suggestions to mix audio and add an outro.
City Lore Interviewing guide
This document provides guidance on conducting interviews, including preparing questions, listening skills, asking open and closed-ended questions, documenting the interview, and analyzing the collected information. Key steps include preparing a list of topics and questions in advance, conducting a practice interview to test equipment, asking follow-up questions to probe for details, taking thorough notes during the interview, and reviewing notes to identify themes and questions that need clarification. The document emphasizes making the interview feel like a conversation and carefully listening without interruption to elicit rich responses.
Group Discussion and Presentation
The document provides guidance on group discussions and presentations. It discusses types of group discussions, selecting discussion topics, dos and don'ts of participating. Some key points include:
- There are different types of group discussions including normal, case study, and role play formats. When selecting a topic, it should be general enough for all to speak on, relevant to current situations, and allow for at least two perspectives.
- When beginning a discussion, only speak if you have sensible things to say to avoid being seen as unprepared or misleading the group. When concluding, summarize all viewpoints and do not force consensus.
- Proper preparation is key for successful presentations. Presenters should understand their audience and tail
Getting better at ppts
The document discusses tips for improving presentations. It recommends keeping presentations concise by avoiding excessive text on slides and focusing on the most relevant points. Visuals like charts and images should be used to enhance the message. Consistency in themes, fonts and spelling is important. When giving presentations, preparation is key and the audience's engagement should be ensured through storytelling, a strong start and conclusion that recaps the main ideas. Maintaining the audience's attention and clearly communicating the most important messages are also emphasized.
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides a summary and evaluation of an FMP project involving the production of a podcast. It discusses the research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, and audience appeal of the podcast project. The research section notes the podcasts researched and how mind maps were used to understand what makes them appealing. Planning involved listening to chosen podcasts and identifying elements to include. Time management and use of equipment could be improved. Peer feedback praised the relaxed delivery but suggested improving audio quality and adding examples or guests.
You are not Listening at UXSEA Summit 2018
This is the presentation deck from UX Conference session by Ben Bowes of Pivotal Labs Singapore as a part of UXSEA Summit 2018 in Singapore. UXSEA Summit 2018 was held from 18th to 20th November, 2018. For more information about UXSEA Society, visit https://uxsea.org/
The copyright of this material is with those who created this presentation material. Please take permissions from the authors if you are in doubt about copyright infringement.
7. evaluation(4)
The student conducted research on stories to find one to adapt for an audio book recording. Their research provided ideas for the story and format but lacked detail. Planning helped determine using an audio book format with sound effects. Time management allowed completing the project on time, but more time could have improved editing and shortening. Feedback noted the fitting use of sound effects and music but a slow start. The student agrees the start was slow and actor occasionally misread lines, and would rerecord lines and shorten the beginning if repeating the project.
Day Four qualitative workshop
The document provides guidance on conducting focus group discussions (FGDs). It outlines the key steps in conducting FGDs which include recruiting 8-10 participants with similar backgrounds, arranging the venue to encourage interaction, conducting the session, and writing up and analyzing the results. For each step, details are provided on the roles of the facilitator and recorder, with tips on facilitating discussion, taking notes, and translating/transcribing the discussions. Common mistakes in note taking and expanding notes are also discussed. The document emphasizes capturing participants' verbatim words and perspectives.
7. evaluation(4) (1) (1)
This document summarizes Reed Cunningham's evaluation of a film review production project. It describes the research, planning, and time management that went into the project. It then evaluates the aural qualities of the audio review, intended audience, and peer feedback. The peer feedback noted the clear voice but some pauses in speech, and suggested rehearsing more and adding more sound effects. Reed agrees rehearsing more would have improved the flow but disagrees that more sound effects were needed. The summary identifies areas for improvement as rehearsing the script more to reduce pauses and potentially adding some sound effects.
Interview Tips
The document provides tips for conducting interviews: be prepared by researching beforehand and testing equipment; be respectful by being on time, showing interest, discussing goals and plans, and thanking the participant; be yourself by relaxing and treating it like a conversation; use good techniques like having an introduction, body, and conclusion, asking follow-up questions, and reducing distractions.
TIPS FOR A GOOD LISTENER AND BARRIERS OF LISTENIG SKILLS
The document discusses various barriers to effective listening, including physical, people-related, physiological, and psychological barriers. Physical barriers include noise, poor acoustics, interruptions, and uncomfortable environments. Physiological barriers are factors like health issues, disabilities, and a wandering attention that make it difficult to focus. Psychological barriers consist of doubts about the speaker, personal anxieties, attitudes like egoism, impatience, and emotional blocks against new ideas. Strategies are provided for overcoming these barriers through focused attention, not interrupting, listening fully before responding, understanding main ideas, asking questions, and providing feedback.
Public speaking
Here are 3 types of speeches with brief descriptions:
1. Informative speech: The purpose is to educate or inform the audience on a particular topic. Facts and explanations are provided objectively without taking a position.
2. Persuasive speech: The goal is to convince the audience to accept a particular position or viewpoint on a debatable topic. Logical arguments and evidence are used to persuade the listeners.
3. Demonstrative speech: The objective is to demonstrate how to do something through clear step-by-step explanations and visual aids if needed. The focus is on showing the audience how rather than just telling them.
The main modes of speech delivery are:
1. Extemporaneous: The
Public Speaking
1. Research your audience to understand their needs, concerns, and objections so you can address them specifically in your speech.
2. Identify the goals and objectives of your audience so you can show how your speech will help them achieve their goals.
3. Consider demographics of your audience like size, knowledge level, attitudes, ages, genders, and cultural factors so you can tailor your speech appropriately.
Moderator Helpful Tips
The document provides tips for moderating a panel discussion. It lists dos and don'ts for moderators. Key responsibilities for moderators include preparing in advance by researching panelists, customizing the discussion format and content, and ensuring panelists turn in materials on time. Moderators should meet with panelists before the event to review goals and discuss time limits. During the event, moderators should engage both the panelists and audience, follow time limits, and ensure the panelists are the main focus while providing a good experience for all.
Extempore tips
- Prepare for an extempore speech by jotting down ideas and vocabulary related to the topic. Maintain confidence and a positive body language.
- Speak clearly at a steady pace on the assigned topic without faking accents or imitating others. Use appropriate vocabulary.
- If you draw a blank, pretend to pause purposefully. Ask the audience questions or request water to buy time to think, but be honest if unable to recall your thoughts.
What's hot (19)
TIPS FOR A GOOD LISTENER AND BARRIERS OF LISTENIG SKILLS
TIPS FOR A GOOD LISTENER AND BARRIERS OF LISTENIG SKILLS
Similar to 7. evaluation(4)
7. Evaluation(4) (2).pptx
The document summarizes an evaluation of a podcast production process. It discusses the research, planning, time management, technical and aural qualities, and audience appeal of the podcast. Peer feedback was also provided on what aspects listeners liked and how the podcast could be improved, such as making it longer by discussing additional topics. The evaluation concluded the planning was thorough, time was well managed, the podcast was clearly presented and discussed the intended football topics, and peer feedback was generally positive while suggesting minor improvements like increasing length.
7. evaluation(4) dxd
This document contains a student's self-evaluation of a podcast production project. In the research section, the student notes strengths like familiarity with podcast structure, and weaknesses like not spending enough time on research. For planning, strengths included thorough questions, but weaknesses were too few questions. For time management, strengths were efficiency but weaknesses were rushing. Technical qualities were similar to other genres. Audio strengths were editing skills but weaknesses were a quiet interview compared to loud music. Peer feedback agreed the interview needed more volume and suggested more sound effects. The student agreed the interview should be louder and some sound effects added.
7. evaluation(4) (1)
The document provides a self-evaluation by Harry Allinson of a podcast production project. It covers research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback received. Key points include that research helped make the podcast more informative, planning improved the structure, time management issues impacted completion, and peer feedback suggested making the podcast longer and improving audio quality.
7. Evaluation(4) (1).pptx 2 copy.pptx
The document summarizes the production process of a podcast. It discusses the research conducted, planning, time management, technical and aural qualities, audience appeal, and feedback received from peers. The research focused on similar football podcasts. Planning helped indicate what would be discussed. Time was managed well. The podcast is similar to others in its presentation style and clear audio quality. It aims to appeal to football fans by discussing topical issues. Peer feedback suggested speaking louder, sitting closer to the mic, and making the podcast longer.
7. Evaluation(4) (1).pptx 2 copy.pptx
The document summarizes the production process of a podcast. It discusses the research conducted, planning, time management, technical and aural qualities, audience appeal, and feedback received from peers. The research focused on similar football podcasts. Planning helped indicate what would be discussed. Time was managed well. The podcast is similar to others in its presentation style and clear audio quality. It aims to appeal to football fans by discussing topical issues. Peer feedback suggested speaking louder, sitting closer to the mic, and making the podcast longer.
Evaluation audio
The document provides an evaluation of the student's podcast production process. It summarizes their research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and feedback received from peers. Some key strengths identified include effective planning, good intro/outro music, and appealing to the target audience. Areas for improvement include having a more detailed script, adding more facts, managing recording issues that caused audio corruptions, and improving overall audio quality. The student agrees feedback about intro/outro music and debate format but disagrees that more sound effects were needed due to audio clarity. They would improve the duration, recording environment, script adherence, and balance of facts versus opinions.
7. evaluation(audio)
Joe Farrell conducted research on successful podcasts like Rooster Teeth and found they typically feature a comedic host. He recorded test podcasts with Josh, but availability issues sometimes required improvising. Feedback noted the podcast's quality, fluidity, and humor but suggested slowing speech, adding introductions, and censoring swearing more. Joe agreed introductions could help but thought the swearing level was appropriate.
7. evaluation(4)
This document summarizes Ryan Craft's evaluation of a podcast production project. According to the summary:
- Research provided ideas and facts to argue why the Warriors will or won't win the NBA championship from different perspectives.
- Planning considered backup ideas and an in-depth look at the favorite idea to structure the script.
- Time management was an issue as the script took too much time, rushing the final product.
- Peer feedback noted the quiet audio and suggested another person's opinion, which the creator disagreed with since both sides were already argued.
- The creator agreed the audio was too quiet and would add more detail or focus on two teams in the future.
7. evaluation final
This document provides a summary and evaluation of Kieran Bradley's final podcast project. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses found during the research, planning, and production stages. For the research stage, strengths included finding existing podcasts to analyze, while a weakness was that the motivations of existing podcasts differed. Planning strengths were creating a mock podcast and practicing with sound effects, while a weakness was not including an ending. Time management was mixed. The final podcast discusses motivation and includes music, but could be improved by making the script and podcast longer, adding more sound effects, and improving transitions between elements. Peer feedback praised the topic and flow but suggested slowing speech, adding background music, and using crossfades between songs. K
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides a summary and evaluation of Caleb Wilcox's podcast production process. Some key points:
- Caleb's research helped him decide on the podcast format but he spent too much time listening to other podcasts and fell slightly behind schedule.
- Caleb's planning went well since he had initial ideas from his research but he could have managed his time better towards the end.
- Caleb believes he managed his time well overall but could have been more effective on individual tasks and completed work faster.
- Caleb's podcast includes creative elements like sound effects and a repeated tune that help engage listeners, making it more interesting than comparable podcasts. However, recording with his brother led to some stuttering that
7. evaluation(7)
This document provides a summary of an evaluation of a production process. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of research, planning, and time management. It also evaluates the technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback of a podcast project. The peer feedback praised the podcast for being creative and engaging, but suggested adding background music and improving the energy. Overall the document reflects on lessons learned about making the podcast more polished and entertaining for listeners.
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides an evaluation of the production process for an audio podcast product. It summarizes the student's research on existing podcasts, planning process using mind maps, time management keeping the project on schedule, technical qualities making it similar to comparable podcasts, use of audio editing software to balance voice and music, targeting the podcast at students by discussing meal deals, and receiving peer feedback recommending interviewing another person and adding more variety to questions to make it more engaging. Based on the feedback, the student agrees more interviews could have provided more information and would make changes like using additional interviewees, more varied questions, and potentially a more relevant backing track or sound effects.
Unit 6 evaluation
The document summarizes Jake Jarvis's evaluation of his podcast production project. Some strengths of his research included focusing on similar genre podcasts to understand formatting and targeting skateboarding audiences. However, he only researched a limited number of podcasts. His planning process was clear and organized using mind maps, though handwriting was difficult to read. Time management was good overall but the podcast could have benefitted from more time for longer interviews and additional research. Feedback noted the podcast was too short and could be improved with more guests and variety in questions. Based on this, Jake plans to make the podcast longer, include more questions and guests.
7. evaluation
The document summarizes Jake Jarvis's evaluation of an FMP project to produce a podcast. Some strengths of the research included focusing on similar genre podcasts to help lay out the structure. However, the research could have been broader. The planning process involved clear mind maps but handwriting was difficult to read. Sufficient time was managed but the project could have benefited from more time for longer interviews and additional research. Feedback noted the podcast was short and suggested longer duration with more guests and questions. In response, the producer agreed changes like expanding the interview length and number of guests could improve the podcast.
7. evaluation(4) done
The document provides a self-evaluation by Dominik Balint of a football podcast production project. It summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of Balint's research, planning, time management, technical qualities, and audience appeal. It also includes feedback from peers which praised the detailed information and suitable background music, but suggested improving the narrator's volume and energy, varying the pitch and pace of delivery, and adding sound effects. In response, Balint agrees changes should be made to make the narration louder and more engaging for listeners.
7. Evaluation(5)
The document summarizes an evaluation of a production process for a podcast on football. It discusses research, planning, time management, technical and aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback. Strengths included gathering sound effects and music, finishing before deadlines, and honest commentary. Weaknesses were an irrelevant audience section in research and not following the original schedule. Peer feedback praised the background music and opinions but suggested discussing fewer topics and improving some editing. The producer agreed improvements could be made to transitions and editing.
7. evaluation unit 6
This document summarizes an evaluation of a radio production project. It covers the strengths and weaknesses of the student's research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, and audience appeal. It also includes feedback from peers. The student agrees with feedback suggesting adding more music to keep the audience engaged and using a music bed to identify their show. They disagree with shortening conversations, feeling the content was interesting. For future projects, the student plans to add more songs between dialogue and include a music bed.
7. evaluation(4)
This document summarizes an evaluation of an FMP project on a music podcast. Some strengths identified were the use of research to find effective ideas from other podcasts and the planning process to narrow down ideas. Weaknesses included a lack of original ideas and not managing time well. Feedback suggested adding more music instead of sound effects and including a wider variety of music. The student agreed improvements could be made by using fewer sound effects and adding more music and information.
Project 7 - Evaluation
Luke created a video telling a story of how two friends gained power but then became negligent, blinding them to other threats until they were blindsided. He spent time researching audience interests and similar products. For planning, Luke referenced existing products and decided to record an unscripted story using narration. He managed his time well, recording over Easter break and editing in advance. While the creative concept and action appealed to the audience, feedback suggested expanding more on the story and its development as well as improving audio balancing and footage quality.
7. evaluation(4)
The document provides an evaluation of an FMP (final major project) podcast production. It covers research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aural qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback. For research, the strengths were inspiration from other podcasts, while weaknesses included limitations in finding similar podcasts. Planning strengths included thorough planning, while weaknesses were difficulty generating original ideas. Time management was adequate but some sections could have been improved. Peer feedback suggested adding more sound effects to make it more interesting. [/SUMMARY]
Similar to 7. evaluation(4) (20)
More from LouisCoopre
Project 1 communication methods (1)
The document summarizes various communication methods and codes for advertising. It outlines 6 key codes: 1) advertisements must be legal, honest and truthful; 2) they must be clearly marked as ads; 3) they cannot be misleading; 4) they cannot intentionally cause harm or offense; 5) they cannot pressure children or promote dangerous behavior; and 6) they must have permission to include celebrities. It also states that food ads cannot promote poor diets or make unsupported health claims.
Project 1 production techniques evaluation final
The document discusses various graphic design, radio, and video game production techniques. For graphic design in Photoshop, advantages include creating neat designs quickly while disadvantages include complexity slowing down poster production. A finished Coca-Cola advert is compared to an official one, noting similarities in theme and differences like audio. For radio production in Premiere Pro, advantages are quick editing through tools but it can be difficult to learn. A radio advert is summarized and strengths of branding and weaknesses of unnatural audio are noted. Finally, advantages of Photoshop for pixel animation and disadvantages of hidden features slowing learning are described.
Radio proposal (1)
The document proposes a radio jingle for Coca-Cola to be released in English-speaking territories like England and the USA. The jingle would tell a simple story of a man on the beach who is thirsty and enjoys a nice, cold, and refreshing can of Coca-Cola. The main message is that Coca-Cola is always fresh and reliable at quenching thirst. The jingle is inspired by but not based on existing Coca-Cola radio ads and would target all people to appeal to as broad an audience as possible.
Advergame proposal (1)
You play as a bottle of Coca-Cola avoiding Pepsi cans by jumping in a 2D side-scrolling game. The game can be played on phones worldwide, appealing to any age, gender or social status with its simple and non-offensive gameplay inspired by Mario. Minor references will be made to Pepsi as the "bad guys" represented as cans that can be avoided by jumping, with logos slightly changed to avoid copyright issues.
7. evaluation (fmp)
The document provides an evaluation of Louis Cooper's magazine design project. It summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of his research, planning, time management, and the technical and aesthetic qualities of the final product. Peer feedback noted that the inclusion of the British flag and font style were good, but text boxes or additional images could have been added. Upon reflection, Louis agrees he could have improved the color scheme to better match the background image.
6. production reflection (fmp)
The document describes the process taken to create the front cover and double page spread for a fishing magazine. It involved adding a background image, title with downloaded font in red, white and blue colors to represent the British flag, and more details like a plug and barcode to the front cover. For the double page spread, the page was split in two to include pages on carp and predator fishing with added facts and tips, along with more tips and an eye-catching title.
5. pre production (fmp)
This document outlines the pre-production for a fishing magazine, including layouts, props, locations, software, contingencies, health and safety, and a schedule. It details the props, locations, software and resources needed, as well as potential issues and solutions for contingencies, health and safety, and a 7-week schedule and plan of action to take photos, transfer them, design pages in Photoshop, and add images and text.
4. proposal (fmp)
The proposed magazine, called The Great British Angler, aims to educate people on fishing locally in Britain, whether they are beginners or advanced. It will provide useful tips and tricks through articles about fishing in British lakes, rivers, and ponds. The target audience is primarily working class men in Britain, who make up the vast majority of fishers. The magazine will not include any offensive, harmful, or copyrighted content.
3. production experiments (fmp)
Louis Cooper documents his experiments with different fonts for his final magazine project on fishing in Britain. He downloaded several fonts from dafont.com and cooltext.com to use for his masthead and headlines. Specifically, he intends to use the font shown in the third slide as his masthead since it fits his relaxed, educational theme well. He also may use the font from the last slide for headlines because it has an informal look appropriate for the tone of his magazine.
4. proposal (fmp)
The proposed magazine, called The Great British Angler, aims to educate people on fishing locally in Britain, whether they are beginners or advanced. It will provide useful tips and tricks through articles about fishing in British lakes, rivers, and ponds. The target audience is primarily working class men in Britain, who make up the vast majority of fishers. The magazine will not include any offensive, harmful, or copyrighted content.
2. research (fmp)
The document outlines research conducted for a fishing magazine, including analyzing existing products, conducting audience questionnaires and interviews, and creating an audience profile. Strengths and weaknesses of each research method are discussed, noting that existing products provided design ideas, questionnaires informed target demographics and price, and interviews revealed experience levels. The response to surveys distributed through friend groups was good but had the disadvantage of some non-fishing interested respondents.
1. initial plans (fmp)
The document outlines initial plans for a British fishing magazine project, including a mind map, mood board analysis, and informal proposal. The mood board images were all relaxed and taken in the UK to appeal to a target audience of local British fishermen. The final product will have a relaxed, non-competitive feel influenced by the mood board. The proposal suggests making magazines using a computer, camera, internet, and Photoshop for a younger, less experienced fishermen audience aged 14-21. Discounted ideas like a radio project and commercial advertisement are rejected due to lack of strong skills or interest in those areas.
1. initial plans(4)
The document outlines initial plans for a podcast, including a group mind map about a Joe Rogan-style talk show focused on mental health. An independent mind map then generated three separate podcast ideas: 1) having guests discuss their mental health experiences, 2) interviews with well-known people on various topics, and 3) appearances by experts to share their thoughts. The final independent mind map narrows the focus to a fishing podcast, with the potential to interview famous fishermen and have experienced anglers from around the world discuss their favorite spots and tips.
2. research(4)
This document reviews several existing podcasts that are similar in format to the podcast that Louis Cooper plans to create. It summarizes three podcasts: The Joe Rogan Experience, which has unscripted long-form conversations on various topics; Baitworks, which focuses discussions on fishing in England; and Startalk Radio, which covers topics in space and science. The document also analyzes these podcasts, noting they all involve talk shows where people share thoughts. It indicates Louis will include this talking format and opinion-based conversations in his own podcast. Finally, it outlines the target audience for Louis's planned fishing podcast.
4. proposal(4)
This document outlines an audio proposal for a podcast about fishing. The podcast aims to both educate and entertain listeners by discussing fishing facts and stories. It will target anyone interested in fishing, though mainly men. The podcast will avoid offensive content and be accessible to all ages. It will discuss different opinions openly to remain non-offensive. The fishing podcast will have a unique focus and content to avoid copyright issues.
6. production reflection(4)
Louis Cooper recorded a podcast about fishing but accidentally paused instead of playing during the initial recording. He had a friend email him the audio file recorded on their phone, then downloaded it to edit in Premiere Pro. To edit, he cut out unwanted sections using the razor tool and added royalty-free music from pixabay.com to enhance the listening experience.
2. research(3) (1)
The document discusses research conducted on existing fishing magazines. It was found that they typically feature bright, colorful designs; photos showing fish catches to entice readers; and content offering fishing tips, tricks and locations. The proposed new magazine will emulate these elements to appeal to its target audience of mainly middle-aged, middle and working-class men by showcasing affordable fishing opportunities and equipment.
1. initial plans(3) (1)
The document discusses initial plans for a project which include mind mapping, creating a mood board, and analyzing the mood board. The mood board contains repeated images of fishing and fish species. The mood board will influence the final product by using different images from it.
3. production experiments (1)
This document summarizes a student's production experiments for a magazine design project. The student used PowerPoint to create a simple initial design. For the final product, the student plans to use Photoshop to make the design look smoother, more unique, and more professional. The student will include the large front title showing the magazine name and a fishing-related background image to represent the magazine's content in the final design.
4. proposal(3) (1)
The proposed magazine, called The British Angler, aims to educate readers about fishing for different fish species found in Britain. It will provide helpful tips and locations for lesser known and well-known fish. The target audience is working and middle class males between 16-90 years old, as they are most interested in fishing. The magazine will not include any offensive material and will be respectful of all social groups to avoid causing offense.
More from LouisCoopre (20)
Recently uploaded
Fashionista Chic Couture Mazes and Coloring AdventureA
Fashionista Chic Couture Maze & Coloring Adventures is a coloring and activity book filled with many maze games and coloring activities designed to delight and engage young fashion enthusiasts. Each page offers a unique blend of fashion-themed mazes and stylish illustrations to color, inspiring creativity and problem-solving skills in children.
一比一原版(BC毕业证)波士顿学院毕业证如何办理
BC毕业证学历书【微信95270640】办理波士顿学院毕业证成绩单（Q微信95270640）毕业证学历认证OFFER专卖国外文凭学历学位证书办理澳洲文凭|澳洲毕业证,澳洲学历认证,澳洲成绩单 澳洲offer,教育部学历认证及使馆认证永久可查 ,国外毕业证|国外学历认证,国外学历文凭证书 BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，专业为留学生办理毕业证、成绩单、使馆留学回国人员证明、教育部学历学位认证、录取通知书、Offer、
专业为留学生办理波士顿学院波士顿学院本科学位证成绩单【100%存档可查】留学全套申请材料办理。本公司承诺所有毕业证成绩单成品全部按照学校原版工艺对照一比一制作和学校一样的羊皮纸张保证您证书的质量！
如果你回国在学历认证方面有以下难题请联系我们我们将竭诚为你解决认证瓶颈
1所有材料真实但资料不全无法提供完全齐整的原件。【如：成绩单丶毕业证丶回国证明等材料中有遗失的。】
2获得真实的国外最终学历学位但国外本科学历就读经历存在问题或缺陷。【如：国外本科是教育部不承认的或者是联合办学项目教育部没有备案的或者外本科没有正常毕业的。】
3学分转移联合办学等情况复杂不知道怎么整理材料的。时间紧迫自己不清楚递交流程的。
如果你是以上情况之一请联系我们我们将在第一时间内给你免费咨询相关信息。我们将帮助你整理认证所需的各种材料.帮你解决国外学历认证难题。
国外波士顿学院波士顿学院本科学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询波士顿学院波士顿学院本科学位证成绩单）；
2开始安排制作波士顿学院毕业证成绩单电子图；
3波士顿学院毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4波士顿学院毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5波士顿学院成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）。疯一把山娃算了算这一次足足花了老爸元够他挣上半个月的山娃很不解一向节俭的父亲啥时变得如此阔绰大方大把大把掏钱时居然连眉头也不皱一下车票早买好了直达卧铺车得经过山娃老家门口山娃拒绝父亲送说往车上一躺就等着下车决无丢失的道理有手机在身联系也方便再说他都岁了还有大半车的小伙伴相伴他不怕在父亲千叮咛万嘱咐中山娃依依不舍地爬上车朝窗外不住地挥手别了父亲别了父亲的城别了我的暑假生活我的城市生活望着窗外挥舞的房
一比一原版美国加州大学圣地亚哥分校毕业证（ucsd毕业证书）如何办理
一模一样【微信：A575476】【美国加州大学圣地亚哥分校毕业证（ucsd毕业证书）成绩单Offer】【微信：A575476】（留信学历认证永久存档查询）采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信：A575476】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信：A575476】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
→ 【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：可来公司面谈，可签订合同，会陪同客户一起到教育部认证窗口递交认证材料，客户在教育部官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
2024 MATFORCE Youth Poster Contest Winners
This document announces the winners of the 2024 Youth Poster Contest organized by MATFORCE. It lists the grand prize and age category winners for grades K-6, 7-12, and individual age groups from 5 years old to 18 years old.
In Focus_ The Evolution of Boudoir Photography in NYC.pdf
In Focus_ The Evolution of Boudoir Photography in NYC.pdfBoudoir Photography by Your Hollywood Portrait
Boudoir photography, a genre that captures intimate and sensual images of individuals, has experienced significant transformation over the years, particularly in New York City (NYC). Known for its diversity and vibrant arts scene, NYC has been a hub for the evolution of various art forms, including boudoir photography. This article delves into the historical background, cultural significance, technological advancements, and the contemporary landscape of boudoir photography in NYC.❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart Final Matka Satta Matta Matka 143 Kalyan Chart Satta fix Jodi Kalyan Final ank Matka Boss Satta 143 Matka 420 Golden Matka Final Satta Kalyan Penal Chart Dpboss 143 Guessing Kalyan Night Chart 一比一原版美国亚利桑那大学毕业证（ua毕业证书）如何办理
一模一样【微信：A575476】【美国亚利桑那大学毕业证（ua毕业证书）成绩单Offer】【微信：A575476】（留信学历认证永久存档查询）采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信：A575476】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信：A575476】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
→ 【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：可来公司面谈，可签订合同，会陪同客户一起到教育部认证窗口递交认证材料，客户在教育部官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
My storyboard for a sword fight scene with lightsabers
My storyboard for a sword fight scene with lightsabers
哪里购买美国乔治城大学毕业证硕士学位证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【美国乔治城大学毕业证硕士学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKAAll the images mentioned in 'See What You're Missing'
We've gathered together all of the images mentioned in Will Gompertz's 'See What You're Missing'
Colour Theory for Painting - Fine Artist.pdf
This document is all about Colour Theory for Fine Artist / Painter.
Recently uploaded (20)
Fashionista Chic Couture Mazes and Coloring AdventureA
Fashionista Chic Couture Mazes and Coloring AdventureA
In Focus_ The Evolution of Boudoir Photography in NYC.pdf
In Focus_ The Evolution of Boudoir Photography in NYC.pdf
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
My storyboard for a sword fight scene with lightsabers
My storyboard for a sword fight scene with lightsabers
storyboard: Victor and Verlin discussing about top hat
storyboard: Victor and Verlin discussing about top hat
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
All the images mentioned in 'See What You're Missing'
All the images mentioned in 'See What You're Missing'
7. evaluation(4)
- 3. Research • My research helped my product by giving my better and broader ideas for my product , the research also helped inspire different kinds of topics and other stuff. • The strengths of my research was that I researched specific ideas that were in line with what I had in my head already which allowed me to develop those same ideas further. • A weakness of my research was that I didn’t know anymore than 1 good podcast already so I had to pick some random ones and listen to them to see if they were good. • I could have put more time into researching the different podcasts to improve my research.
- 4. Planning • The strengths of my planning were that I could strengthen my researched ideas and get them written down. My planning helped my product because I had written down a rough script to go off of as a talking point in the podcast. • I feel like my planning was a little weak because of the lack of it , I feel like I could have put my time into planning the podcast to make it sound more professional and to have had more ideas in it.
- 5. Time Management • As a way of time management I made sure to get my research , planning and experiments done as fast but also as in depth as possible so I would have more time to produce the final product. In the final product production I also managed my time by writing out a rough script to keep the time roughly around 5 minutes.
- 6. Technical Qualities • My product is similar to other existing products such as the joe rogan podcast because they engage in general discussion on certain topics whether that simply be convocational or educational. • A difference between the two podcasts is the topics they talk about , my product focuses on fishing whereas the joe rogan podcast discusses general interesting topics.
- 7. Aural Qualities • I believe my work does sound good and im happy with how creative it was , I didn’t think the audio project would be one I would enjoy but I did and im happy with the outcome. I liked the general discussion feel to my final project and I thought that this was one of its strengths .
- 8. Audience Appeal In my research I wrote that my target audience would be 16-99 , I said I would do this by ‘Making nice open minded friendly discussions on the podcast to appeal to anyone interested.’ I did not do this in the end but I did end up making it appeal to this age range by talking about travelling and local fishing because the average age for a fisherman is 16+ Another way of appealing to my target audience of working class men is by suggesting local areas but also talking about foreign fishing as this is what a lot of these people would be interested in as they dream of doing it one day. I should have mentioned good places to buy equipment as this would have appealed even further but unfortunately I did not.
- 10. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? – I enjoyed the vast knowledge of fish. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – Could have had better audio quality.
- 11. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? – The topic of discussion • What improvements could have been made to the product? – Different and more open areas of discussion.
- 12. Feedback 3 • What did you like about the product? – The open minded questions. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – More English based talk like local fishing.
- 13. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback? The topic of discussion • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? – Could have had better audio , which I do agree with but also there was no better way available for me to get better sounding audio.
- 14. Peer Feedback Summary I would change the fact that more discussion should have been based more around the UK and local fishing so that it would suit better into my target audience of working class people as your average working class man cannot afford to go to the places we discussed on the podcast. To change this next time I would talk about home waters such as the sea or local rivers and ponds which would probably interest my target audience further.
Editor's Notes
- What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
- What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
- Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
- Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
- Does your work sound good? Was it creative? What aspects of your product’s audio do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
- How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Make reference to specific recordings, dialogue, music and sound effects
- What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?