The document compares the author's preliminary magazine project with their actual completed magazine product. For the front cover, the preliminary version had a poorly placed title and lower image quality, while the actual cover used proper conventions like a bold title behind the model. The contents page of the preliminary project had too much white space, while the completed version experimented more with fonts, color, and layout. Overall, the real magazine showed improved use of design elements and techniques to engage readers.

1. Question 7: comparing my
preliminary task with my actual
products.

2. Front cover

3. • As you can see, my front cover of my preliminary task is to a lower
standard compared to my front cover. My actual front cover uses real
conventions like having the title bold and behind the model whereas In my
preliminary task the title is poorly placed at the top.
• Also my image is better because the girl is looking at the camera and is
posing, however the other image is effective as it relates to the school,
however it is worse quality badly edited and doesn’t have a clear focus.
• Also I have experimented more with fonts and used colour on them to
make them look effective and more eye catching.

4. Contents

5. • My contents page has developed a lot, i have effective white space now
which breaks up the text and images, however in my preliminary task
white space was too frequent and ruined my contents page as things were
poorly placed.
• Also i have more use of fonts and colour. My preliminary task lacked colour
which makes it weaker, my real magazine incooperates colour that run with
my house theme and are effectively chosen.
• However both on my preliminary task and actual product have relevant
pictures to the context of the magaizne.
• On my actual magazine i have a box with more informormation about how
to get more magazine.
• I also have text under each sub heading with more detail and i have used
techniques and punctuation to intice the reader in.