It comprises on mating designs used in plant breeding programs. 6 basic mating designs are briefly explained in it with their requirements as well limiting factors...
Stability parameters for comparing varieties (eberhart and russell 1966)Dhanuja Kumar
Phenotype is a result of genotype, environment and GE interaction. GENOTYPE- environment interactions are of major
importance to the plant breeder in developing
improved varieties. The performance of a single variety is not the same in all the environments. To identify a genotype whose performance is stable across environments various models were proposed. One such model was proposed by EBERHART and RUSSELL in 1966. Even after decades, this model is still preferred over others and used till date for stability analysis.
Power Point is deals with the different aspects of Quantitative genetics in plant breeding it converse Basic Principles of Biometrical Genetics, estimation of Variability, Correlation, Principal Component Analysis, Path analysis, Different Matting design and Stability so on
Definitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakistsudha2555
Maintenance breeding definition of variety, cultivar, EDS, IDV, reference variety. Variety development, notification and release procedure in India and Pakistan
Stability analysis and G*E interactions in plantsRachana Bagudam
Gene–environment interaction is when two different genotypes respond to environmental variation in different ways. Stability refers to the performance with respective to environmental factors overtime within given location. Selection for stability is not possible until a biometrical model with suitable parameters is available to provide criteria necessary to rank varieties / breeds for stability. Different models of stability are discussed.
Stability refers to the performance with respective changing environmental factors overtime within given location.
Selection for stability is not possible until a biometrical model with suitable parameters is available to provide criteria necessary to rank varieties / breeds for stability.
The presentation was done as part of the course STAT 504 titled Quantitative Genetics in Second Semester of MSc. Agricultural Statistics at Agricultural College, Bapatla under ANGRAU, Andhra Pradesh
Advanced biometrical and quantitative genetics akshayAkshay Deshmukh
Additive and Multiplicative Model
Shifted Multiplicative Model
Analysis and Selection of Genotype
Methods and steps to select the best model
Bioplot and mapping genotype
Heterotic group “is a group of related or unrelated genotypes from the same or different populations, which display similar combining ability and heterotic response when crossed with genotypes from other genetically distinct germplasm groups.”
It comprises on mating designs used in plant breeding programs. 6 basic mating designs are briefly explained in it with their requirements as well limiting factors...
Stability parameters for comparing varieties (eberhart and russell 1966)Dhanuja Kumar
Phenotype is a result of genotype, environment and GE interaction. GENOTYPE- environment interactions are of major
importance to the plant breeder in developing
improved varieties. The performance of a single variety is not the same in all the environments. To identify a genotype whose performance is stable across environments various models were proposed. One such model was proposed by EBERHART and RUSSELL in 1966. Even after decades, this model is still preferred over others and used till date for stability analysis.
Power Point is deals with the different aspects of Quantitative genetics in plant breeding it converse Basic Principles of Biometrical Genetics, estimation of Variability, Correlation, Principal Component Analysis, Path analysis, Different Matting design and Stability so on
Definitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakistsudha2555
Maintenance breeding definition of variety, cultivar, EDS, IDV, reference variety. Variety development, notification and release procedure in India and Pakistan
Stability analysis and G*E interactions in plantsRachana Bagudam
Gene–environment interaction is when two different genotypes respond to environmental variation in different ways. Stability refers to the performance with respective to environmental factors overtime within given location. Selection for stability is not possible until a biometrical model with suitable parameters is available to provide criteria necessary to rank varieties / breeds for stability. Different models of stability are discussed.
Stability refers to the performance with respective changing environmental factors overtime within given location.
Selection for stability is not possible until a biometrical model with suitable parameters is available to provide criteria necessary to rank varieties / breeds for stability.
The presentation was done as part of the course STAT 504 titled Quantitative Genetics in Second Semester of MSc. Agricultural Statistics at Agricultural College, Bapatla under ANGRAU, Andhra Pradesh
Advanced biometrical and quantitative genetics akshayAkshay Deshmukh
Additive and Multiplicative Model
Shifted Multiplicative Model
Analysis and Selection of Genotype
Methods and steps to select the best model
Bioplot and mapping genotype
Heterotic group “is a group of related or unrelated genotypes from the same or different populations, which display similar combining ability and heterotic response when crossed with genotypes from other genetically distinct germplasm groups.”
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
1. SCALING TEST
GPB 621 – PRINCIPLES OF QUANTITATIVE GENETICS
Class - 6
Dr. K. SARAVANAN
Professor
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding
Faculty of Agriculture
Annamalai University
2. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
SCALING TEST
• A test for additivity.
• Suggested by Mather.
• It is made by using mean measurements of the traits of various
generations.
.
3. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
• If the gene effects involved in a hybrid is additive only, then F1 value
should not differ significantly from the mid-parental mean.
i.e.,
= P1 + P2 = 2F1
= 2F1 = P1 + P2 (or) 2F1 – (P1 + P2) = 0
The value obtained 2F1 – (P1 + P2) should not differ significantly from zero
.
1
2
1
2
F
P
P
4. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
• The same principle is applicable to the segregating generations like F2
or back cross generation either P1 nor P2.
• This we refer to “Adequacy of the scale”
• Hence,
.
4
2 2
1
1
2
P
F
P
F
4
2 2
2
1
3
P
F
P
F
1
P
to
BC
2
1
1
1
P
F
B
2
P
to
BC
2
2
1
2
P
F
B
0
)
2
(
4 2
1
1
2
P
F
P
F
0
)
2
(
4 2
2
1
3
P
F
P
F
0
)
(
2 1
1
1
P
F
B
0
)
(
2 2
1
2
P
F
B
5. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
• Mather worked out this scaling for other segregating generation as
below
• A = (For Back cross to P1)
• B = (For Back cross to P2)
• C = (For F2 generation)
• D = (For F3 generation)
The above formulae are valid on the assumption that the epistatis is
absent
.
0
)
(
2 1
1
1
P
F
B
0
)
(
2 2
1
2
P
F
B
0
)
2
(
4 2
1
1
2
P
F
P
F
0
)
2
(
4 2
2
1
3
P
F
P
F
6. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
• Conversely if A. B. C. or D. significantly deviated from zero for a trait
then it demonstrates the “inadequacy” of the scale, that is some non
additive gene effects like epistasis are present.
.
7. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
How to test whether these values are significant or not?
• By using the variances of the various generations for the respective means,
tests of significance are made.
• The variances of the various generations is arrived by squaring the standard
errors of the means.
.
Variance of F2 = VF2
Variance of B1 = VB1
Variance of B2 = VB2
Variance of P1 = VP1
Variance of P2 = VP2
Then the variance of the quantities A.B.C and D determined as
Variance of A = VA = 4VB1+VP1+VF1
Variance of B = VB = 4VB2+VP2+VF1
Variance of C = VC = 16VF2+4VF1+VP1+VP2
Variance of D = VD = 16VF3+4VF2+VP1+VP2
8. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
• The standard errors are found as the square roots of the corresponding
variances
i.e., SE of A = √𝑉𝐴
SE of B = √𝑉𝐵
SE of C = √𝑉𝐶
SE of D = √𝑉𝐷
.
Then significant can be tested as
usual
• i.e., if values of A, B, C or D do
not differ by twice the SE then
the values can be considered
that they are not significant from
zero
9. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
• The adequacy or otherwise of this model has generally no
relationship with the range of variation of the crosses.
• The model which is adequate for one cross may not be adequate for
another which covers the same range or variation and still in-
adequate for other crosses covering wider ranges of variation.
• If inadequacy of the scale is noted in a cross, it may be then reworked
using
1. Logarithmic transformations (or)
2. Joint scaling test.
The analysis may also be extended directly to estimate parameters of epistatic
components.
.
10. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
Problem 1
• Work out scaling test for given population. Data per plant yield in
gram of the hybrid Reba B.50 x Laxmi.
.
Generation Mean ± SE
P1 7.20 ± 2.47
B1 20.42 ± 3.50
F1 24.07 ± 2.64
F2 21.66 ± 4.60
B2 19.25 ± 3.71
P2 9.20 ± 2.70
11. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
• A = 2B1 – (F1 + P1)
= (2 X 20.42) – (24.07 +7.20)
= 9.57
• B = 2B2 – (F1 + P2)
= (2 X 19.25) – (24.07 + 9.20)
= 5.23
• C = 4F2 – (2F1 +P1 +P2)
= (4 X 21.66) – ((2 X 24.07) + 7.20 + 9.20))
= 22.10
.
Generation Mean ± SE
P1 7.20 ± 2.47
B1 20.42 ± 3.50
F1 24.07 ± 2.64
F2 21.66 ± 4.60
B2 19.25 ± 3.71
P2 9.20 ± 2.70
12. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
Working of SE
• VA = 4VB1+VP1+VF1
= 4(3.50)2 + (2.47)2+ (2.64)2
= 62.0705
SE =√𝑽𝑨
= 62.0705 = 7.88
Test of Significant
t =
𝑨
𝑺𝑬𝑨
=
𝟗.𝟓𝟕
𝟕.𝟖𝟖
= 1.2144
.
Generation Mean ± SE
P1 7.20 ± 2.47
B1 20.42 ± 3.50
F1 24.07 ± 2.64
F2 21.66 ± 4.60
B2 19.25 ± 3.71
P2 9.20 ± 2.70
13. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
.
Generation Mean ± SE
P1 7.20 ± 2.47
B1 20.42 ± 3.50
F1 24.07 ± 2.64
F2 21.66 ± 4.60
B2 19.25 ± 3.71
P2 9.20 ± 2.70
• VB = 4VB2+VP2+VF1
= 4(3.71)2 + (2.70)2+ (2.64)2
= 69.3160
SE =√𝑽𝑩
= 69.3160 = 8.33
Test of Significant
t =
𝑩
𝑺𝑬𝑩
=
𝟓.𝟐𝟑
𝟖.𝟑𝟑
= 0.6278
14. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
.
Generation Mean ± SE
P1 7.20 ± 2.47
B1 20.42 ± 3.50
F1 24.07 ± 2.64
F2 21.66 ± 4.60
B2 19.25 ± 3.71
P2 9.20 ± 2.70
• VC = 16VF2+4VF1+VP1 +VP2
= 16(4.60)2 + 4(2.64)2 +
(2.47)2+ (2.70)2
= 379.8293
SE =√𝑽𝑪
= 379.8293 = 19.48
Test of Significant
t =
𝑪
𝑺𝑬𝒄
=
𝟐𝟐.𝟏𝟎
𝟏𝟗.𝟒𝟖
= 1.1345
15. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
Result :
• A = 9.57 ± 7.88
• B = 5.23 ± 8.33
• C = 22.10 ± 19.48
.
• if values of A, B, C or D do not
differ by twice the SE then the
values can be considered that
they are not significant from zero
• t – Table value = 1.96
Scale SCALE VARIANCE SE CALCULATED t VALUE
A 9.57 62.0705 7.88 1.2144 Non Significant
B 5.23 69.3160 8.33 0.6278 Non Significant
C 22.10 379.8293 19.48 1.1345 Non Significant
16. Dr. K. Saravanan, GPB, AU
• Problem 2
• Work out scaling test for given sesame seed yield data.
.
Generation MEAN VARIANCE
P1 18.09 0.23
B1 28.72 0.25
F1 30.05 0.15
F2 42.63 0.32
B2 36.71 0.29
P2 26.05 0.21