The document discusses factorable polynomials and how to graph them. It defines a factorable polynomial as one that can be written as the product of linear factors using real numbers. For large values of x, the leading term of a polynomial dominates so the graph resembles that of the leading term. To graph a factorable polynomial, one first graphs the individual factors like x^n and then combines them, which gives smooth curves tending to the graphs of the leading terms for large x.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...sonjaschweigert1
Rapid and secure feature delivery is a goal across every application team and every branch of the DoD. The Navy’s DevSecOps platform, Party Barge, has achieved:
- Reduction in onboarding time from 5 weeks to 1 day
- Improved developer experience and productivity through actionable findings and reduction of false positives
- Maintenance of superior security standards and inherent policy enforcement with Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Development teams can ship efficiently and ensure applications are cyber ready for Navy Authorizing Officials (AOs). In this webinar, Sigma Defense and Anchore will give attendees a look behind the scenes and demo secure pipeline automation and security artifacts that speed up application ATO and time to production.
We will cover:
- How to remove silos in DevSecOps
- How to build efficient development pipeline roles and component templates
- How to deliver security artifacts that matter for ATO’s (SBOMs, vulnerability reports, and policy evidence)
- How to streamline operations with automated policy checks on container images
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
1. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
http://www.lahc.edu/math/precalculus/math_260a.html
2. Sign Charts of Factorable Formulas
A polynomial P(x) = anxn + an-1xn-1 + .. + a1x + a0
is said to be factorable if (using only real numbers)
P(x) = an(x – r1) (x – r2) .. (x – rk) .
N1 N2 Nk
3. A polynomial P(x) = anxn + an-1xn-1 + .. + a1x + a0
is said to be factorable if (using only real numbers)
P(x) = an(x – r1) (x – r2) .. (x – rk) .
N1 N2 Nk
Example A: P(x) = 2x7 – 16x5 + 32x3
= 2x3(x4 – 8x2 + 16) = 2x3(x2 – 4)2
= 2(x – 0)3(x + 2)2(x – 2)2
Sign Charts of Factorable Formulas
4. A polynomial P(x) = anxn + an-1xn-1 + .. + a1x + a0
is said to be factorable if (using only real numbers)
P(x) = an(x – r1) (x – r2) .. (x – rk) .
Hence r1, r2,.. ,rk are the roots of P(x).
N1 N2 Nk
Example A: P(x) = 2x7 – 16x5 + 32x3
= 2x3(x4 – 8x2 + 16) = 2x3(x2 – 4)2
= 2(x – 0)3(x + 2)2(x – 2)2
Sign Charts of Factorable Formulas
5. A polynomial P(x) = anxn + an-1xn-1 + .. + a1x + a0
is said to be factorable if (using only real numbers)
P(x) = an(x – r1) (x – r2) .. (x – rk) .
Hence r1, r2,.. ,rk are the roots of P(x).
N1 N2 Nk
Example A: P(x) = 2x7 – 16x5 + 32x3
= 2x3(x4 – 8x2 + 16) = 2x3(x2 – 4)2
= 2(x – 0)3(x + 2)2(x – 2)2
So P(x) is factorable with roots x = 0, –2, and 2.
Sign Charts of Factorable Formulas
6. A polynomial P(x) = anxn + an-1xn-1 + .. + a1x + a0
is said to be factorable if (using only real numbers)
P(x) = an(x – r1) (x – r2) .. (x – rk) .
Hence r1, r2,.. ,rk are the roots of P(x).
The order of a root is the corresponding power
raised in the factored form, i.e.
the order of the r1 is N1, order of r2 is N2 ,etc..
N1 N2 Nk
Example A: P(x) = 2x7 – 16x5 + 32x3
= 2x3(x4 – 8x2 + 16) = 2x3(x2 – 4)2
= 2(x – 0)3(x + 2)2(x – 2)2
So P(x) is factorable with roots x = 0, –2, and 2.
Sign Charts of Factorable Formulas
7. A polynomial P(x) = anxn + an-1xn-1 + .. + a1x + a0
is said to be factorable if (using only real numbers)
P(x) = an(x – r1) (x – r2) .. (x – rk) .
Hence r1, r2,.. ,rk are the roots of P(x).
The order of a root is the corresponding power
raised in the factored form, i.e.
the order of the r1 is N1, order of r2 is N2 ,etc..
N1 N2 Nk
Example A: P(x) = 2x7 – 16x5 + 32x3
= 2x3(x4 – 8x2 + 16) = 2x3(x2 – 4)2
= 2(x – 0)3(x + 2)2(x – 2)2
So P(x) is factorable with roots x = 0, –2, and 2.
x = 0 has order 3, x = –2 and x = 2 have order 2.
Sign Charts of Factorable Formulas
8. Behaviors of factorable polynomials give us insights to
behaviors of all polynomials.
A polynomial P(x) = anxn + an-1xn-1 + .. + a1x + a0
is said to be factorable if (using only real numbers)
P(x) = an(x – r1) (x – r2) .. (x – rk) .
Hence r1, r2,.. ,rk are the roots of P(x).
The order of a root is the corresponding power
raised in the factored form, i.e.
the order of the r1 is N1, order of r2 is N2 ,etc..
N1 N2 Nk
Example A: P(x) = 2x7 – 16x5 + 32x3
= 2x3(x4 – 8x2 + 16) = 2x3(x2 – 4)2
= 2(x – 0)3(x + 2)2(x – 2)2
So P(x) is factorable with roots x = 0, –2, and 2.
x = 0 has order 3, x = –2 and x = 2 have order 2.
Sign Charts of Factorable Formulas
9. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
In this and the next sections, we devise a strategy for
graphing factorable polynomial and rational functions.
10. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
In this and the next sections, we devise a strategy for
graphing factorable polynomial and rational functions.
A basic fact about the graphs of polynomials is that
their graphs are continuous lines:
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
11. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
In this and the next sections, we devise a strategy for
graphing factorable polynomial and rational functions.
A basic fact about the graphs of polynomials is that
their graphs are continuous lines:
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
x x
Graphs of Non–polynomials
12. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
In this and the next sections, we devise a strategy for
graphing factorable polynomial and rational functions.
A basic fact about the graphs of polynomials is that
their graphs are continuous lines:
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
x x
Graphs of Non–polynomials
To graph a function, we separate the job into two parts.
13. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
In this and the next sections, we devise a strategy for
graphing factorable polynomial and rational functions.
A basic fact about the graphs of polynomials is that
their graphs are continuous lines:
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
x x
Graphs of Non–polynomials
To graph a function, we separate the job into two parts.
I. What does the graph look like in the “middle”,
i.e. the curvy portion that we draw on papers?
14. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
In this and the next sections, we devise a strategy for
graphing factorable polynomial and rational functions.
A basic fact about the graphs of polynomials is that
their graphs are continuous lines:
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
x x
Graphs of Non–polynomials
To graph a function, we separate the job into two parts.
I. What does the graph look like in the “middle”,
i.e. the curvy portion that we draw on papers?
II. What does the graph look like beyond the drawn
area?
15. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
In this and the next sections, we devise a strategy for
graphing factorable polynomial and rational functions.
A basic fact about the graphs of polynomials is that
their graphs are continuous lines:
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
x x
Graphs of Non–polynomials
To graph a function, we separate the job into two parts.
I. What does the graph look like in the “middle”,
i.e. the curvy portion that we draw on papers?
II. What does the graph look like beyond the drawn
area?
We start with part II with factorable polynomials.
16. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
We start with the graphs of the polynomials y = ±xN.
17. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
We start with the graphs of the polynomials y = ±xN.
The graphs y = xeven
y = x2
18. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The graphs y = xeven
y = x2y = x4
(1, 1)(-1, 1)
We start with the graphs of the polynomials y = ±xN.
19. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The graphs y = xeven
y = x2y = x4y = x6
(1, 1)(-1, 1)
We start with the graphs of the polynomials y = ±xN.
20. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The graphs y = xeven
y = x2y = x4y = x6
y = -x2
y = -x4
y = -x6
(1, 1)(-1, 1)
(-1,-1) (1,-1)
We start with the graphs of the polynomials y = ±xN.
21. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The graphs y = xeven
y = x2y = x4y = x6
y = -x2
y = -x4
y = -x6
y = ±xeven:
y = xeven y = –xeven
(1, 1)(-1, 1)
(-1,-1) (1,-1)
We start with the graphs of the polynomials y = ±xN.
23. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
y = x3
y = x5
(1, 1)
(-1, -1)
The graphs y = xodd
24. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
y = x3
y = x5
y = x7
(1, 1)
(-1, -1)
The graphs y = xodd
25. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The graphs y = xodd
y = x3
y = x5
y = x7 y = -x3
y = -x5
y = -x7
(1, 1)
(-1, -1)
(-1, 1)
(1,-1)
26. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The graphs y = xodd
y = x3
y = x5
y = x7 y = -x3
y = -x5
y = -x7
y = ±xodd
y = xodd y = –xodd
(1, 1)
(-1, -1)
(-1, 1)
(1,-1)
27. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Facts about the graphs of polynomials:
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
28. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Facts about the graphs of polynomials:
• The graphs of polynomials are unbroken curves.
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
29. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Facts about the graphs of polynomials:
• The graphs of polynomials are unbroken curves.
x x
Graphs of Non–polynomials
(broken or discontinuous)x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
30. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Facts about the graphs of polynomials:
• The graphs of polynomials are unbroken curves.
• Polynomial curves are smooth (no corners).
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
x x
Graphs of Non–polynomials
(broken or discontinuous)
31. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Facts about the graphs of polynomials:
• The graphs of polynomials are unbroken curves.
• Polynomial curves are smooth (no corners).
x
x
Graphs of Polynomials
x x
Graphs of Non–polynomials
(broken or discontinuous)
Graphs of Non–polynomials
(not smooth, has corners)
x
32. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Let P(x) = Axn (Head) + lower degree terms (Tail).
33. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Let P(x) = Axn (Head) + lower degree terms (Tail).
For large |x|, the Head Axn (the leading term)
dominates the Tail (lower degree terms).
34. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Let P(x) = Axn (Head) + lower degree terms (Tail).
For large |x|, the Head Axn (the leading term)
dominates the Tail (lower degree terms).
That is, for x's to the far left and right (| x |'s are large),
the Tail is negligible compare to Axn.
35. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Let P(x) = Axn (Head) + lower degree terms (Tail).
For large |x|, the Head Axn (the leading term)
dominates the Tail (lower degree terms).
That is, for x's to the far left and right (| x |'s are large),
the Tail is negligible compare to Axn.
Let’s take P(x) = x5 (Head) + 1000 x4 (Tail) as an example.
The ratio of the Tail: Head is 1000 x4/ x5 =1000/x.
36. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Let P(x) = Axn (Head) + lower degree terms (Tail).
For large |x|, the Head Axn (the leading term)
dominates the Tail (lower degree terms).
That is, for x's to the far left and right (| x |'s are large),
the Tail is negligible compare to Axn.
Let’s take P(x) = x5 (Head) + 1000 x4 (Tail) as an example.
The ratio of the Tail: Head is 1000 x4/ x5 =1000/x.
For “large” x's (say x = 10100, one google), 1000/x ≈ 0.
This means the Tail 1000x4 contributes a negligible amount compared to the
Head x5. So y = x5 shapes the graph of y = P(x) = x5 + 1000 x4 for large |x|'s.
37. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Let P(x) = Axn (Head) + lower degree terms (Tail).
For large |x|, the Head Axn (the leading term)
dominates the Tail (lower degree terms).
That is, for x's to the far left and right (| x |'s are large),
the Tail is negligible compare to Axn.
Hence, for x where |x| is "large",
y = P(x) resembles y = Axn (the Head)
Let’s take P(x) = x5 (Head) + 1000 x4 (Tail) as an example.
The ratio of the Tail: Head is 1000 x4/ x5 =1000/x.
For “large” x's (say x = 10100, one google), 1000/x ≈ 0.
This means the Tail 1000x4 contributes a negligible amount compared to the
Head x5. So y = x5 shapes the graph of y = P(x) = x5 + 1000 x4 for large |x|'s.
38. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Let P(x) = Axn (Head) + lower degree terms (Tail).
For large |x|, the Head Axn (the leading term)
dominates the Tail (lower degree terms).
That is, for x's to the far left and right (| x |'s are large),
the Tail is negligible compare to Axn.
Realizing this, we see there’re four types of graphs
of polynomials, to the far left or far right, basing on
i. the sign of the leading term Axn and
Hence, for x where |x| is "large",
y = P(x) resembles y = Axn (the Head)
Let’s take P(x) = x5 (Head) + 1000 x4 (Tail) as an example.
The ratio of the Tail: Head is 1000 x4/ x5 =1000/x.
For “large” x's (say x = 10100, one google), 1000/x ≈ 0.
This means the Tail 1000x4 contributes a negligible amount compared to the
Head x5. So y = x5 shapes the graph of y = P(x) = x5 + 1000 x4 for large |x|'s.
39. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Let P(x) = Axn (Head) + lower degree terms (Tail).
For large |x|, the Head Axn (the leading term)
dominates the Tail (lower degree terms).
That is, for x's to the far left and right (| x |'s are large),
the Tail is negligible compare to Axn.
Realizing this, we see there’re four types of graphs
of polynomials, to the far left or far right basing on
i. the sign of the leading term Axn and
ii. whether n is even or odd.
Hence, for x where |x| is "large",
y = P(x) resembles y = Axn (the Head)
Let’s take P(x) = x5 (Head) + 1000 x4 (Tail) as an example.
The ratio of the Tail: Head is 1000 x4/ x5 =1000/x.
For “large” x's (say x = 10100, one google), 1000/x ≈ 0.
This means the Tail 1000x4 contributes a negligible amount compared to the
Head x5. So y = x5 shapes the graph of y = P(x) = x5 + 1000 x4 for large |x|'s.
41. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
y = +xeven + lower degree terms:
Behaviors of polynomial-graphs to the "sides":
42. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
y = +xeven + lower degree terms: y = –xeven + lower degree terms:
Behaviors of polynomial-graphs to the "sides":
43. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
y = +xeven + lower degree terms: y = –xeven + lower degree terms:
Behaviors of polynomial-graphs to the "sides":
y = +xodd + lower degree terms:
44. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
y = +xeven + lower degree terms: y = –xeven + lower degree terms:
Behaviors of polynomial-graphs to the "sides":
y = +xodd + lower degree terms: y = –xodd + lower degree terms:
45. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For factorable polynomials, we use the sign-charts to
sketch the central portion of the graphs.
46. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For factorable polynomials, we use the sign-charts to
sketch the central portion of the graphs.
Recall that given a polynomial P(x), it's sign-chart is
constructed in the following manner:
47. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For factorable polynomials, we use the sign-charts to
sketch the central portion of the graphs.
Recall that given a polynomial P(x), it's sign-chart is
constructed in the following manner:
Construction of the sign-chart of polynomial P(x):
48. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For factorable polynomials, we use the sign-charts to
sketch the central portion of the graphs.
Recall that given a polynomial P(x), it's sign-chart is
constructed in the following manner:
Construction of the sign-chart of polynomial P(x):
I. Find the roots of P(x) and their order respectively.
49. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For factorable polynomials, we use the sign-charts to
sketch the central portion of the graphs.
Recall that given a polynomial P(x), it's sign-chart is
constructed in the following manner:
Construction of the sign-chart of polynomial P(x):
I. Find the roots of P(x) and their order respectively.
II. Draw the real line, mark off the answers from I.
50. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For factorable polynomials, we use the sign-charts to
sketch the central portion of the graphs.
Recall that given a polynomial P(x), it's sign-chart is
constructed in the following manner:
Construction of the sign-chart of polynomial P(x):
I. Find the roots of P(x) and their order respectively.
II. Draw the real line, mark off the answers from I.
III. Sample a point for it's sign, use the orders of the
roots to extend and fill in the signs.
51. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For factorable polynomials, we use the sign-charts to
sketch the central portion of the graphs.
Recall that given a polynomial P(x), it's sign-chart is
constructed in the following manner:
Construction of the sign-chart of polynomial P(x):
I. Find the roots of P(x) and their order respectively.
II. Draw the real line, mark off the answers from I.
III. Sample a point for it's sign, use the orders of the
roots to extend and fill in the signs.
Reminder:
Across an odd-ordered root, sign changes
Across an even-ordered root, sign stays the same.
52. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
53. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Solve x2 – 3x – 4 = 0
(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
54. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Solve x2 – 3x – 4 = 0
(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0
The roots are x = 4 , -1 and both are odd-ordered.
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
55. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Solve x2 – 3x – 4 = 0
(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0
The roots are x = 4 , -1 and both are odd-ordered.
Mark off these points on a line.
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
56. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Solve x2 – 3x – 4 = 0
(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0
The roots are x = 4 , -1 and both are odd-ordered.
Mark off these points on a line.
4-1
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
57. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Solve x2 – 3x – 4 = 0
(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0
The roots are x = 4 , -1 and both are odd-ordered.
Mark off these points on a line. Test for sign using x
= 0 and we get f(0) negative.
4-1
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
58. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Solve x2 – 3x – 4 = 0
(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0
The roots are x = 4 , -1 and both are odd-ordered.
Mark off these points on a line. Test for sign using x
= 0 and we get f(0) negative.
0 4-1
Test x = 0,
we get that
f(0) negative.
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
59. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Solve x2 – 3x – 4 = 0
(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0
The roots are x = 4 , -1 and both are odd-ordered.
Mark off these points on a line. Test for sign using x
= 0 and we get f(0) negative. Since both roots are
odd-ordered, the sign changes to "+" across the
them.
0 4-1
Test x = 0,
we get that
f(0) negative.
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
60. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Solve x2 – 3x – 4 = 0
(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0
The roots are x = 4 , -1 and both are odd-ordered.
Mark off these points on a line. Test for sign using x
= 0 and we get f(0) negative. Since both roots are
odd-ordered, the sign changes to "+" across the
them.
0 4-1
Test x = 0,
we get that
f(0) negative.
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
+ +
61. Example B. Make the sign-chart of f(x) = x2 – 3x – 4
Solve x2 – 3x – 4 = 0
(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0
The roots are x = 4 , -1 and both are odd-ordered.
Mark off these points on a line. Test for sign using x
= 0 and we get f(0) negative. Since both roots are
odd-ordered, the sign changes to "+" across the
them.
0 4-1
Test x = 0,
we get that
f(0) negative.
Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The graph of y = x2 – 3x – 4 is shown below:
+ +
63. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Note the sign-chart reflects the graph:
I. The graph touches or crosses the x-axis at the roots.
+ + + + + – – – – – + + + + +
4-1
y=(x – 4)(x+1)
64. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Note the sign-chart reflects the graph:
I. The graph touches or crosses the x-axis at the roots.
II. The graph is above the x-axis where the sign is "+".
+ + + + + – – – – – + + + + +
4-1
y=(x – 4)(x+1)
65. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Note the sign-chart reflects the graph:
I. The graph touches or crosses the x-axis at the roots.
II. The graph is above the x-axis where the sign is "+".
III. The graph is below the x-axis where the sign is "–".
+ + + + + – – – – – + + + + +
4-1
y=(x – 4)(x+1)
67. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
II. The “Mid-Portions” of Polynomial Graphs
Graphs of an odd ordered root (x – r)odd at x = r.
68. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
+ +
order = 1
r r
II. The “Mid-Portions” of Polynomial Graphs
Graphs of an odd ordered root (x – r)odd at x = r.
y = (x – r)1
y = –(x – r)1
69. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
+ +
order = 1
r r
II. The “Mid-Portions” of Polynomial Graphs
Graphs of an odd ordered root (x – r)odd at x = r.
order = 3, 5, 7..
y = (x – r)1
y = –(x – r)1
+
rr
+
r
y = (x – r)3 or 5.. y = –(x – r)3 or 5..
70. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
order = 2, 4, 6 ..
++
x=r
r
Graphs of an even ordered root at (x – r)even at x = r.
order = 2, 4, 6 ..
y = (x – r)2 or 4.. y = –(x – r)2 or 4..
71. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
order = 2, 4, 6 ..
++
If we know the roots of a factorable polynomial,
then we may construct the central portion of the
graph (the body) in the following manner using its
sign chart.
x=r
r
Graphs of an even ordered root at (x – r)even at x = r.
order = 2, 4, 6 ..
y = (x – r)2 or 4.. y = –(x – r)2 or 4..
72. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
order = 2, 4, 6 ..
++
If we know the roots of a factorable polynomial,
then we may construct the central portion of the
graph (the body) in the following manner using its
sign chart.
I. Draw the graph about each root using the
information about the order of each root.
II. Connect all the pieces together to form the graph.
x=r
r
order = 2, 4, 6 ..
y = (x – r)2 or 4.. y = –(x – r)2 or 4..
Graphs of an even ordered root at (x – r)even at x = r.
73. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For example, given two
roots with their orders and
the sign-chart of a
polynomial,
74. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For example, given two
roots with their orders and
the sign-chart of a
polynomial,
+
order=2 order=3
75. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For example, given two
roots with their orders and
the sign-chart of a
polynomial, the graphs
around each root are as
shown.
+
order=2 order=3
76. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For example, given two
roots with their orders and
the sign-chart of a
polynomial, the graphs
around each root are as
shown. Connect them to get
the whole graph.
+
order=2 order=3
77. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For example, given two
roots with their orders and
the sign-chart of a
polynomial, the graphs
around each root are as
shown. Connect them to get
the whole graph.
+
order=2 order=3
78. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For example, given two
roots with their orders and
the sign-chart of a
polynomial, the graphs
around each root are as
shown. Connect them to get
the whole graph.
Example C. Given P(x) = -x(x + 2)2(x – 3)2, identify
the roots and their orders. Make the sign-chart.
Sketch the graph about each root. Connect them to
complete the graph.
+
order=2 order=3
79. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For example, given two
roots with their orders and
the sign-chart of a
polynomial, the graphs
around each root are as
shown. Connect them to get
the whole graph.
Example C. Given P(x) = -x(x + 2)2(x – 3)2, identify
the roots and their orders. Make the sign-chart.
Sketch the graph about each root. Connect them to
complete the graph.
The roots are x = 0 of order 1,
+
order=2 order=3
80. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
For example, given two
roots with their orders and
the sign-chart of a
polynomial, the graphs
around each root are as
shown. Connect them to get
the whole graph.
Example C. Given P(x) = -x(x + 2)2(x – 3)2, identify
the roots and their orders. Make the sign-chart.
Sketch the graph about each root. Connect them to
complete the graph.
The roots are x = 0 of order 1, x = -2 of order 2,
and x = 3 of order 2.
+
order=2 order=3
81. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The sign-chart of P(x) = -x(x + 2)2(x – 3)2 is
++
x = 3
order 2
x = 0
order 1
x = -2
order 2
82. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The sign-chart of P(x) = -x(x + 2)2(x – 3)2 is
++
x = 3
order 2
x = 0
order 1
x = -2
order 2
By the sign-chart and the order of each root, we draw
the graph about each root.
83. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The sign-chart of P(x) = -x(x + 2)2(x – 3)2 is
++
x = 3
order 2
x = 0
order 1
x = -2
order 2
By the sign-chart and the order of each root, we draw
the graph about each root.
84. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The sign-chart of P(x) = -x(x + 2)2(x – 3)2 is
++
x = 3
order 2
x = 0
order 1
x = -2
order 2
By the sign-chart and the order of each root, we draw
the graph about each root. (Note for x = 0 of order 1,
the graph approximates a line going through the point.)
85. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The sign-chart of P(x) = -x(x + 2)2(x – 3)2 is
++
x = 3
order 2
x = 0
order 1
x = -2
order 2
By the sign-chart and the order of each root, we draw
the graph about each root. (Note for x = 0 of order 1,
the graph approximates a line going through the point.)
Connect all the pieces to get the graph of P(x).
86. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
The sign-chart of P(x) = -x(x + 2)2(x – 3)2 is
x = -2
order 2
++
x = 0
order 1
x = 3
order 2
By the sign-chart and the order of each root, we draw
the graph about each root. (Note for x = 0 of order 1,
the graph approximates a line going through the point.)
Connect all the pieces to get the graph of P(x).
87. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Note the graph resembles its leading term: y = –x5,
when viewed at a distance:
88. Graphs of Factorable Polynomials
Note the graph resembles its leading term: y = –x5,
when viewed at a distance:
-2
++
0 3