The document summarizes an Oak Harbor City Council workshop presentation about plans to upgrade the city's wastewater treatment facilities. It discusses the proposed site near Windjammer Park, provides cost estimates and rate impact analyses, and outlines next steps which include value engineering, selecting a final treatment plant location with public input, preliminary design, and evaluating construction delivery options. Key Council decisions are scheduled for 2013 and 2014 to approve the plan, location, and project delivery approach.
On August 14, 2012, the Project Team presented information to City Council and asked for a resolution to proceed with planning and further environmental review of a proposed site and treatment process for the City’s new wastewater treatment plant. Three alternatives were presented: an MBR plant at the Windjammer Vicinity; an Activated Sludge plant at Crescent Harbor North; and an MBR plant at Crescent Harbor North. After listening to the presentation and considering public comment, City Council voted unanimously on a resolution to move forward with an MBR plant at the Windjammer Vicinity.
What you need to know: Implementation is technically more complicated than developing a charging schedule; the 2014 regulations have introduced some useful amendments;
a number of policies are discretionary and require a decision to ‘turn on’ and there is little in the regulations regarding how to spend CIL.
Brian Bradley, PA DEP, “Pennsylvania AML/AMD Program and Funding Overview”Michael Hewitt, GISP
The presentation will provide updates on the status of PA’s AML/AMD program and the outlook of current and future funding. The topics presented will include: BAMR’s Fund Management Responsibilities and Balances; Re-unification of the AML and AMD programs under BAMR’s umbrella; Present status of the AMD program and plans for moving forward; Updates on new and developing AML/AMD programs including the $90 million AML Economic Enhancement and Reuse Pilot Program, PA’s AML Emergency Program, and the RECLAIM Act (H.R. 4456); and, highlights on a few of the major AML hazard projects BAMR currently has underway.
The cleanup of AMD itself presents economic opportunities in addition to, of course, all the environmental benefits that result from cleaner streams and restored lands. It is vitally important that key policy makers understand the importance and benefits of AMD cleanup, and in particular the economic benefits. This presentation will highlight the findings from a recently completed study that focused on job creation around the long-term maintenance of passive treatment systems across Pennsylvania.
http://floridawaterdaily.com. The City of Tampa Public Works Department presented an assessment of the needs for the City's stormwater infrastructure to the City Council at the 5/20/2015 meeting.
On August 14, 2012, the Project Team presented information to City Council and asked for a resolution to proceed with planning and further environmental review of a proposed site and treatment process for the City’s new wastewater treatment plant. Three alternatives were presented: an MBR plant at the Windjammer Vicinity; an Activated Sludge plant at Crescent Harbor North; and an MBR plant at Crescent Harbor North. After listening to the presentation and considering public comment, City Council voted unanimously on a resolution to move forward with an MBR plant at the Windjammer Vicinity.
What you need to know: Implementation is technically more complicated than developing a charging schedule; the 2014 regulations have introduced some useful amendments;
a number of policies are discretionary and require a decision to ‘turn on’ and there is little in the regulations regarding how to spend CIL.
Brian Bradley, PA DEP, “Pennsylvania AML/AMD Program and Funding Overview”Michael Hewitt, GISP
The presentation will provide updates on the status of PA’s AML/AMD program and the outlook of current and future funding. The topics presented will include: BAMR’s Fund Management Responsibilities and Balances; Re-unification of the AML and AMD programs under BAMR’s umbrella; Present status of the AMD program and plans for moving forward; Updates on new and developing AML/AMD programs including the $90 million AML Economic Enhancement and Reuse Pilot Program, PA’s AML Emergency Program, and the RECLAIM Act (H.R. 4456); and, highlights on a few of the major AML hazard projects BAMR currently has underway.
The cleanup of AMD itself presents economic opportunities in addition to, of course, all the environmental benefits that result from cleaner streams and restored lands. It is vitally important that key policy makers understand the importance and benefits of AMD cleanup, and in particular the economic benefits. This presentation will highlight the findings from a recently completed study that focused on job creation around the long-term maintenance of passive treatment systems across Pennsylvania.
http://floridawaterdaily.com. The City of Tampa Public Works Department presented an assessment of the needs for the City's stormwater infrastructure to the City Council at the 5/20/2015 meeting.
Foundations for New Champlain Bridge Corridor ProjectDaksh Raj Chopra
In this presentation, we constructed 15 temporary bent foundations for the New Champlain Bridge. The presentation is about the project management done for this project.
RV 2014: TOD Market Dreams + Reality by John BreitingerRail~Volution
TOD Market Dreams + Realities
The station is in, the riders are coming and the development has been proposed. Now everybody wants retail. But is there a market for it? Will it be supported? Or would other uses be more appropriate and generate additional riders? Everyone expects TOD to generate a mix of uses -- to create a 24/7 environment at every station. How do market realities change that equation? Learn what it takes to support that mixed-use environment that everyone expects; how to assess the market and what residents really want; and how to manage expectations if the market doesn't deliver.
Moderator: William M. Velasco, Chair of Board TOD Committee, DART, Dallas, Texas
Christine Maguire, AICP, EDFP, Senior Manager, Development Planning and Finance Group, Austin, Texas
Anne B. Ricker, Principal/Owner, Ricker Cunningham, Centennial, Colorado
John Breitinger, Vice President, Investment and Development, United Properties, Bloomington, Minnesota
Michael Horsting, AICP, Principal Analyst, Regional Transportation Authority, Chicago, Illinois
Final 12 01 community mtg phase ii presentationSCVTA
This is the presentation shared at VTA's BART Silicon Valley Phase II Dec 1, 2014 community meeting at the Mexican Heritage Plaza. One minor typo was corrected on slide 15 (2010 environmental clearance was for 10 miles, not 16 as stated in previous version).
This presentation is from the free online course, which i delivered in February 2013.
*If you downloaded before the 8th August, please download again the correct file* -Feel free to download and share. -Denise
Connecticut Green Bank Stakeholder Webinar Quarter 4 FY17RudySturkCGB
Connecticut Green Bank Stakeholder Webinar Quarter 4 FY17 (presented Aug. 8, 2017) featuring CEO and President Bryan Garcia. A video of the presentation is also available on ctgreenbank.com.
“Share Sustainability” by Hugh Share at the 2023 Water for Food Global Conference. A recording of the presentation can be found on the conference playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSBeKOIXsg3JNyPowwJj6NDSpx4vlnCYj.
Bracken Hendricks | Innovation Showcase | 2014 Solar SymposiumGW Solar Institute
This is an Ignite Style presentation (five minute max presentations with slides that automatically advance every 15 seconds) that was a part of the 2014 Solar Symposium Innovation Showcase.
Bracken Hendricks, CEO, Urban Ingenuity
PACE and Affordable Housing: Find out how Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing can fund clean energy retrofits and help solve broader financial challenges for affordable housing developers, owners, and property managers by providing a new capital solution for affordable housing preservation.
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
6. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/6Oh910i1-8594.pptx/6
Total Project Cost Summary
Year 2030
$83.0
$7.6
$2.9
$50
$55
$60
$65
$70
$75
$80
$85
$90
$95
$100
All Facilities Through Year 2030
ProjectCost,Millions
TreatmentFacility Wastewater Conveyance EffluentDischarge
7. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/7Oh910i1-8594.pptx/7
Phasing Scenarios Depend on City Growth
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
MaximumMonthFlow,mgd
Measured Data
Scenario 1, No Growth
Scenario 2, Intermediate Growth
Scenario 3, ComprehensivePlan
1
2
3
Notes:
1: Currentmeasured capacity is 3.0 mgd.
2: Capacity required at projected year of startup (2017) rangesfrom3.0 to 3.2 mgd.
3: Assuming 3.4 mgd of capacity is constructed in Phase 1, yearsof service
(prior to Phase 2) rangefrom 4 to 13 years.
1
2
3
8. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/8Oh910i1-8594.pptx/8
Phasing Also Depends on Navy Participation
• Navy currently contributes about 20% of flow to
City facilities
• Scenario 1: Navy continues as a customer
– WWTP sized for City and Navy flows/loads
• Scenario 2: Navy does not continue as a customer
– WWTP sized for City only flows/loads
11. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/11Oh910i1-8594.pptx/11
Phase 1 Scenario Summary
Scenario 1
City + Navy
Scenario 2
City Only
Phase 1 Project Cost $82.6 M $67.7 M
Navy Share (%) 27% n/a
Navy Share of Cost $22.6 M n/a
City Share of Cost $60.0 M $67.7
12. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/12Oh910i1-8594.pptx/12
Milestone Dates for Plan Approval
Date Action
March 6, 2013 Present Draft Plan to Public
March 19, 2013 Seek Council Approval to Submit Draft Plan
Summer 2013 Ecology Conditional Approval (pending environmental)
Q4 2013 - Q1 2014 Final Environmental Approvals
14. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/14Oh910i1-8594.pptx/14
Two Scenarios for Navy Participation
• Scenario 1: City + Navy
– City provides service to Navy at startup of Phase
1 and through Year 2030
– All project/O&M costs are shared
• Scenario 2: City Only
– City, Navy operate independent facilities through
Year 2030 (Navy no longer a customer)
– All project/O&M costs are born by City
15. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/15Oh910i1-8594.pptx/15
Navy Cost-Sharing Assumptions
• WWTP Project Costs
– Navy share based on percentage of maximum
month flow (ranges from 21% to 18%)
• WWTP O&M Costs
– Navy share based on percentage of average
annual flow (ranges from 17% to 14%)
• Collection System Project Costs
– Navy provides 100% of costs associated with
conveying Navy flow to Windjammer Vicinity
• Outfall Project Costs
– Navy share based on percentage of peak flow
(approximately 19% at 2030)
16. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/16Oh910i1-8594.pptx/16
WWTP Funding Assumption Review
• 2010 rate study included assumptions for the
WWTP funding
• Assumptions were conservative given the project
was 5 plus years in the future
• Revised assumptions are conservative yet still
reflect current conditions
• Question: How do the assumptions impact the
adopted rate transition plan?
17. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/17Oh910i1-8594.pptx/17
Estimated Rate Impact, August 14, 2012
“Base Case” Assumed $70 million Project
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9
Base Case $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75 $72.85 $81.95 $92.20
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$80.00
$90.00
$100.00
MonthlySewerBill
Summary of Required Single Family Monthly Sewer Bill
“Base Case”
Monthly Rate: $92.20
18. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/18Oh910i1-8594.pptx/18
Variables include:
1. Borrowing term
2. Interest rate
3. Navy participation
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9
$0.00
$20.00
$40.00
$60.00
$80.00
$100.00
$120.00
$140.00
MonthlySewerBill
Summary of Required Single Family Monthly Sewer Bill
Estimated Rate Impact, August 14, 2012
Rate Scenarios for $93.5 million Project
Monthly Rates range
from $85 to > $115
(Depending on
variable assumptions)
19. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/19Oh910i1-8594.pptx/19
Updated WWTP Funding Assumptions
• 2 Borrowing terms evaluated: 20 and 30 years
• 2 Interest Rates evaluated: 4.5% and 6.0%
• Updated City’s sewer reserves balance
• Reconciled other key rate analysis assumptions
– Project cost escalated to mid-point
– City portion of project cost based on Navy
participation
– Cost of bonding
– WWTP O&M components and costs
– Project start/end dates
20. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/20Oh910i1-8594.pptx/20
Three Potential Phase 1 Funding Scenarios
• Scenario 1: City + Navy
– 30 years, 4.5% interest
– Results in lowest City rate
• Scenario 2A: City Only
– 30 years, 4.5% interest
– Rate is higher than Scenario 1; still < “Base Case”
• Scenario 2B: City Only
– 20 years, 6.0% interest
– Highest rate; > “Base Case”
21. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/21Oh910i1-8594.pptx/21
Comparison of Potential Monthly Sewer Bills
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9
Base Case $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75 $72.85 $81.95 $92.20
Scenario 1: City + Navy; 30-yrs; 4.5% $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $51.70 $56.87 $62.56 $68.81 $75.69 $83.26
Scenario 2A: City Only; 30-yrs; 4.5% $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.40 $72.13 $80.78 $90.48
Scenario 2B: City Only; 20-yrs; 6.0% $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.88 $59.48 $68.11 $77.99 $89.68 $107.62
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
MonthlySewerBill
RequiredSingle Family Monthly Sewer Bill
22. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/22Oh910i1-8594.pptx/22
Summary of Rate Impacts, WWTP
• Lowest City rates result from City + Navy
partnership in new facilities
• For “City Only” scenario, City rates held below
“Base Case” with current, reasonable assumptions
• Opportunities to reduce City rate impact due to
new WWTP continue to be explored
– Grants/low-interest loan programs
– Borrowing strategy
– “Value Engineering”
– Project Delivery Method
• Overall rate analysis for sewer utility is ongoing
24. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/24Oh910i1-8594.pptx/24
Objectives for Next Phase of Project
Through Year-end
• Facilities Plan approved
• Confirm planning assumptions through “Value
Engineering”
• Select final location for WWTP within
Windjammer Vicinity
• Complete preliminary design of WWTP
• Select most appropriate method of construction
• Complete final design of outfall to Oak Harbor
25. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/25Oh910i1-8594.pptx/25
Key Features of Approach Moving Forward
• Continue to make every effort to deliver an
appropriate facility while controlling cost and
impact on ratepayers
• Maintain flexibility by considering options for final
WWTP site location
• Select final location considering public input, cost
and City policy directives
26. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/26Oh910i1-8594.pptx/26
Step 1 – Value Engineering
• Completed on large projects to add value,
control cost
• Condition of some funding sources
• Facilitated by an independent 3rd party and panel
of experts
• Summer 2013: Results and recommendations
offered to City Council for consideration
28. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/28Oh910i1-8594.pptx/28
Step 2 – Select Final WWTP Location Within
Windjammer Vicinity
A. Spring/Summer 2013: Public meetings, Council
deliberations establish policy, guiding principles
– Property acquisition
– Use of open space
– Additional features/
benefits associated
with facility
– Integration with other
nearby land-use plans
29. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/29Oh910i1-8594.pptx/29
Step 2 – Select Final WWTP Location Within
Windjammer Vicinity
B. Summer/Fall 2013: Working Group Meetings,
Charrette leverage public input to develop
options within Windjammer Vicinity
30. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/30Oh910i1-8594.pptx/30
Step 2 – Select Final WWTP Location Within
Windjammer Vicinity
C. Fall 2013: Project team presents analysis of
options to City Council for decision
– Confirm Value Engineering Recommendations
– Confirm treatment facility location
– Confirm approach to integrate facility into
surroundings
• Transportation
• Parks/Open Space
• Commercial/Retail
• Government/Public Facilities
32. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/32Oh910i1-8594.pptx/32
Step 3 – WWTP Preliminary Design
B. Combine technical detail, public input to
develop final “look & feel” of facility
Concept inspired by
June 2012 Charrrett
process.
Alternate concept
showing potentially
different site use.
33. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/33Oh910i1-8594.pptx/33
Step 3 – WWTP Preliminary Design
B. Combine technical detail, public input to
develop final “look & feel” of facility
Working Group
Meetings throughout
preliminary design.
34. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/34Oh910i1-8594.pptx/34
Step 3 – WWTP Preliminary Design
C. Develop drawings and specifications to 30
percent level detail
D. Evaluate alternatives to complete the Project
– Design-Bid-Build
– Design-Build
– General Contractor/Construction Manager
E. Spring 2014: Select delivery option and
proceed to final design in early 2014
35. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/35Oh910i1-8594.pptx/35
Step 4 – Outfall Final Design
• “Fast track” to provide necessary information for
permitting
• Complete in parallel with Steps 1 – 3
• Design complete in fall 2013
• Construction possible in 2014, pending results of
construction delivery analysis
36. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/36Oh910i1-8594.pptx/36
Significant Council Actions & Decisions
Date Action/Decision
Mar 19, 2013
Council authorizes submission to Ecology;
Approves next phase of project
Summer 2013
Council sets policy and guiding principles to
select final location
Fall 2013
Council selects final location of treatment
facility
Spring 2014
Council approves approach to complete
project
37. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/37Oh910i1-8594.pptx/37
Overall Project Schedule
OAK HARBOR CLEAN WATER FACILITY
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
PREDESIGN PHASE
APPROVE
FACILITIES PLAN
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD
START
UP
Agency Draft
Submission
Submit Plans &
Specs
FINALDESIGN PHASE
39. Oh910i1-8594.pptx/39
Send an email or give us a call if
you would like to participate:
Joe Stowell, City Engineer
360-279-4520
jstowell@oakharbor.org