Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (18)
Similar to Oak Harbor Design Open House
Similar to Oak Harbor Design Open House (20)
More from publicinvolvement
More from publicinvolvement (9)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Oak Harbor Design Open House
- 1. Oak Harbor Clean Water Facility Project Public Open House – August 12, 2015
- 2. • 6:00 – 6:15 Welcome! • 6:15 – 6:45 Presentation by project staff • 6:45 – 7:00 Q & A session • 7:00 – 8:00 Feedback stations and discussion Tonight’s Agenda 8/12/2015 2
- 3. How We Got Here 8/12/2015 3
- 4. Site Selection and Design Process 8/12/2015 4 Design Open House Tonight! Open House Dec. 2010 Discussed 11 potential locations Public Meeting Aug. 2011 Reviewed top 3 sites Council Meeting Aug. 2012 Council selected Windjammer Vicinity Design Charrette Nov. 2014 Architectural Theme (part 1) Design Charrette May 2015 Architectural Theme (part 2) Open House April 2011 Reviewed top 5 sites Open House April 2014 Siting factors Open House March 2013 Facilities plan update Open House July 2014 Site plan and location update within Windjammer Public Meeting April 2012 Reviewed costs and top 3 sites Public Meeting July 2012 Narrowed to 2 sites: • Windjammer Vicinity • Crescent Harbor
- 5. • Support early design work through small group in-depth discussions with design team • Provide diverse community perspectives • Help to develop ideas for the architectural “look and feel” Purpose of Design Charrette Group 8/12/2015 5
- 6. • Press release, email notification, and website update announced the formation of group • Approximately 15 community members were asked • 3 at-large positions available • Group was selected by City staff to represent the community Workshop Group Formation 8/12/2015 6
- 7. • 12 members, including 3 at-large positions representing: Workshop Group Formation 8/12/2015 7 Arts Commission Economic Development Main Street Association Chamber of Commerce Planning Commission Parks Department Dillard’s Addition Peoples Bank Oak Harbor School District Condo Association Community members Whidbey Island Marathon Landscape architect Interest in architecture
- 8. Design Charrette 1 – November 13, 2014 8/12/2015 8 • Learn about the civil engineering associated with the project (which dictates height and size of buildings) • Provide insight into Oak Harbor’s existing architectural character • Help narrow choices for architectural design of the new Clean Water Facility
- 9. • Facility should set the stage for a community design aesthetic • A combination of both a campus and a courtyard with higher priority on campus • Regional design as an architectural aesthetic, incorporate both contemporary and traditional NW architecture • Open and light, enhance sight lines to water, park, and windmill • Allow for community interaction with facility, include educational features • Varying heights of roof lines • Provide “camouflaging” – it should not advertise that it’s a sewage treatment plant • Integrate with surroundings – Windjammer Park, harbor area, downtown Design Themes from Charrette 1 8/12/2015 9
- 10. Design Charrette 2 – May 6, 2015 8/12/2015 10 • Check back on incorporation of group feedback for proposed architectural concept for the new Oak Harbor Clean Water Facility, furthering design team’s work. • Gather additional feedback on design refinements • Narrow options for landscape and hardscape to integrate into the Windjammer Park setting
- 11. • Campus concept • Open and light • Enhancing sightlines to the water, park, and windmill is beginning to take shape • Varying heights of rooflines is progressing • “Camouflaging” the wastewater treatment facility • Potential for community interaction with the facility through educational or interpretive features • Opportunity to set the stage for a community design aesthetic and the tone for Oak Harbor's downtown corridor Charrette 2 – Fulfilling Aspirations 8/12/2015 11
- 12. • Celebrate City Beach corner as a gateway into the facility and park • Generate methods to break the façade into smaller sections • Continue to keep sightlines and views of the water and windmill in mind • Think about methods to offer respite or cover for pedestrians (e.g., awnings) • Consider the architectural styles favored by charrette group: contemporary and traditional Northwest • Allow for feedback on exterior building materials – stone and wood or brick • Locate wayfinding and handicap parking locations Charrette 2 – Things to Work on 8/12/2015 12
- 14. 8/12/2015 14 Our Wastewater System
- 15. How the Treatment Facility Works 8/12/2015 15
- 16. Site Layout: Compact, Efficient, Accessible 8/12/2015 16
- 18. Operations Buildings 8/12/2015 18 Headworks Building Secondary Treatment Building Solids Building
- 19. Where We Are Right Now 8/12/2015 19
- 21. Siting a wastewater facility in Windjammer Park is an opportunity for community amenity that showcases design on our waterfront. • The majority of cost of the treatment facility is driven by its mechanics and function to clean and treat wastewater. • Architectural design and landscaping is roughly 4 – 5.5% of construction cost. • Concept A and Concept B are similar enough in cost to both be evaluated by the public at this time. Cost Considerations 8/12/2015 21
- 23. Design Concept A: Administrative Building (View from SW) 8/12/2015 23
- 24. Design Concept B: Administrative Building (View from SW) 8/12/2015 24
- 25. Design Concept A: Administrative Building (View from S) 8/12/2015 25
- 26. Design Concept B: Administrative Building (View from S) 8/12/2015 26
- 27. Design Concept A: Electrical Building (View from NW) 8/12/2015 27
- 28. Design Concept B: Electrical Building (View from NW) 8/12/2015 28
- 29. Design Concept B: Headworks Building (View from NE) 8/12/2015 29
- 30. Design Concept A: Headworks Building (View from NE) 8/12/2015 30
- 31. Design Concept A: Solids Building (View from SE) 8/12/2015 31
- 32. Design Concept B: Solids Building (View from SE) 8/12/2015 32
- 33. Design Concept A: Exterior Finish Materials 8/12/2015 33 Vertical/Horizontal Sun Shade Wood Slat Painted Metal Weathered Wood Fence Spandrel Panel Brick
- 34. Design Concept B: Exterior Finish Materials 8/12/2015 34 Vertical/Horizontal Sun Shade Weathered Wood Fence Spandrel Panel Brick Cement Fiber/Wood Panel Heavy Timber Framing
- 35. Comparing Design Concepts A & B 8/12/2015 35
- 40. What’s Happening Tonight 8/12/2015 40 • Please visit the various stations around the room to learn more about and provide your thought on: • Project as a whole • Design concepts • Views and sightlines • Landscaping and public space • Education and interpretive opportunities
- 42. What’s Happening Tonight 8/12/2015 42 • Please visit the various stations around the room to learn more about and provide your thought on: • Project as a whole • Design concepts • Views and sightlines • Landscaping and public space • Education and interpretive opportunities
Editor's Notes
- ERIN Welcomes everyone to meeting Introduces herself and team
- ERIN Review agenda and goals for the evening
- ERIN
- ERIN Review the steps taken by the City to involve the public and Council in decisions for the facility, leading to this evening.
- ERIN Set the context of the design charrette and why the group was convened. Reinforce this is one of many ways the project will gather design input from the community.
- ERIN Announced formation of the group on the website, via email, and with a press release. Included in announcement was how the group would be formed and the opportunity for community members to express interest and request to participate. Participation in the group was a large commitment. To apply for at-large positions we asked people to tell us why they wanted to participate and what their background/interest was. Group members had to commit time outside of the workshop to read about the project and gather homework images.
- ERIN Explain the community organizations/groups represented by the charrette members.
- ERIN Review purpose of charrette 1.
- ERIN Review key themes and take-aways from charrette 1.
- ERIN Review purpose of charrette 2. Based on feedback from charrette 1 the team presented a campus style facility that provide varied roof lines, and spacing between buildings.
- ERIN Review key take-aways from charrette 2. Campus concept Open and light (Potential to increase use of windows) Enhancing sightlines to the water, park, and windmill is beginning to take shape Varying heights of rooflines (Some buildings are approaching maximum height per code. Potential to use landscape or roofed kiosks to help give the idea of additional varied rooflines.) “Camouflaging” the wastewater treatment facility Opportunities for community interaction with the facility with educational or interpretive features Opportunity to set the stage for a community design aesthetic and the tone for Oak Harbor's downtown corridor
- ERIN Review what the team has been continuing to work on since the last charrette.
- JOE
- JOE Brief overview of how Oak Harbor’s wastewater infrastructure works. You may have seen this sign up in the park. Reason we need a new facilty.
- JOE Review what happens once water enters the facility. The process water has to go through has implications for how the facility must be laid out.
- JOE Review the site layout and the technical reasons the site has to be organized this way. Show where the water enters the site and how it moves through the site in the most efficient way possible.
- JOE
- JOE Visuals to show machinery and space requirements within the operations buildings. There is no wasted space inside these buildings, which brings up building height. These buildings much accommodate some heavy and specific machinery, and allow for personnel to access that machinery. The overall the height of buildings is governed by City code, ==== IF QUESTION COMES UP -- NOTES ABOUT HEIGHT: Governed by code In general, building height is defined as the vertical distance from the average natural grade level to the highest point of a roof. Structures excluded from building height code: Housing of elevators, stairways, etc. Parapet walls Skylights, towers, and similar structures
- JOE
- JOE Review project schedule and discuss: Current construction activities Outfall construction Early site work Cost estimate When to expect 60%
- JOE
- JEFF We have heard the design charrette group’s input to date, and based on that input, we are now in a place where we have our original design that has evolved, and a second design for feedback. We are looking for feedback on both of these design concepts tonight, with the goal, as Erin has said, to best fit this facility in Windjammer Park.
- JEFF I’ll start with Design Concept A…[BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF Now turning to Design Concept B… [BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF [BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF [BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF [BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF [BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF [BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF [BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF [BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF [BE CLEAR WHERE LOOKING AT THIS VIEW]
- JEFF
- JEFF
- JEFF Here are the two side by side
- ERIN
- ERIN