Guaranteed Maximum Price
Amendment #13
City Council Workshop – April 11, 2018
• Purpose
• GMP #13 overview
• Windjammer Park
• Funding and Procurement Strategy
• GMP #13 Cost
• Impact to Clean Water Facility
• FAQ
Agenda
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 2
• Update City Council on the development of GMP #13
• Discuss the overlap between the CWF and Park
Improvements
• Discuss the cost development for GMP #13
• CWF project cost impacts / rate impacts
• Discuss Windjammer Park Phase 1 options
Purpose
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 3
• GMP #13 overview
Agenda
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 4
• GMP #13 includes the following elements
• Clean Water Facility Improvements (Must Have Items)
• Mitigation / Restoration
• Fencing
• Paving
• Water Main
• Demolition
• Windjammer Park Phase 1 improvements
(Implement Windjammer Park Integration Plan)
Guaranteed Maximum Price
Amendment #13
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 5
6
7
8
• Windjammer Park
Agenda
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 9
10
Decembe
r 2015
Januar
y 2016
February
2016
March
2016
April
2016
May/
June
2016
Council and CAG Process
• Provide
feedback on 3
concept
alternatives
• Present WPIP
concept to
community
• Gather community
feedback (Public
Open House and
Online Open
House)
• Review preferred
plan to be
presented to City
Council
• Provide final
feedback
• CAG forms
• CAG provides
feedback on
design
guidelines
• Introduce CAG
and WPIP to
community
• Gather
community
feedback (Public
Open House)
COUNCIL
• Programming
priorities
• Approves CAG
COUNCIL
Report:
Alternatives and
Public feedback
COUNCIL
Approves plan
COUNCIL
CAG formation update
and initial priorities list/
design guidelines
4/11/2018






 





City Council Workshop
What We Heard
4/11/2018 11
• “Given” elements must be included (e.g. – restrooms,
kitchens, parking, playgrounds, waterfront trail, sport courts)
• Family-friendly elements should be prioritized
• Current RV park standards are not an efficient use of the
park space
• Views of the water are important
• The ballfields should be relocated in the long term
City Council Workshop
Proposed
Phase 1
4/11/2018 12
Original Phase
1
To include
part of
Phase 2 & 3
Windjammer Park Phase 1
4/11/2018 13
• Includes Clean Water
Facility mitigation and
restoration
• November 15, 2016 –
City Council amended
Carollo’s contract to
include design
Windjammer Park Phase 1
Open House 1
4/11/2018 14
• 167 community members attended
in-person and online open houses in
January 2017
• 97 community members provided
input on park character and theme
City Council Workshop
What We Heard
4/11/2018 15
• Highest priority elements are restrooms, walkways, a
nature play area, park furnishings, and a splash
park
• Participants preferred a natural, simple aesthetic
• Park spaces should be flexible and multi-purpose
• Thoughts on style inspirations for specific elements
City Council Workshop
Windjammer Park Phase 1
Open House 2
4/11/2018 16
• 290 community members
attended in-person and online
open houses in
August/September 2017
• 79 community members provided
general comments, thoughts on
the park design, and priorities for
future park phases
City Council Workshop
What We Heard
4/11/2018 17
• Excitement for the splash park
• Appreciation for the future
park’s design aesthetic
• Requests to add pickle ball
courts
City Council Workshop
• Funding and Procurement Strategy
Agenda
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 18
• Both Sewer and General Funds will be used
• How do we distinguish which fund pays for what?
• 7 bid packages
• Base Bid = Sewer Fund
• Bid Alternates = General Fund
Funding and Procurement Strategy
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 19
• GMP #13 Cost
Agenda
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 20
Element Sewer Fund General Fund Total
Bid Items $8,072,220 $3,764,023 $11,836,243
Self Performed $1,169,774 $814,694 $1,984,468
NSS $223,156 $275,093 $498,249
Sub-total $9,465,150 $4,853,810 $14,318,960
GMP Risk Contingency @ 3.0% $283,955 $145,614 $429,569
Owner Design Contingency @ 2.0% $189,303 $97,076 $286,379
GMP #10 Allowance Adjustment $850,000 $0 $850,000
Specified General Conditions $165,000 $220,000 $385,000
Sub-total $10,953,408 $5,316,500 $16,269,908
GCCM Fee @ 4.28% $468,806 $227,546 $696,352
GMP Sub-total $11,422,214 $5,544,046 $16,966,260
Sales Tax @ 8.7% $993,733 $482,332 $1,476,065
GMP #13 Total w/Sales Tax $12,415,947 $6,026,378 $18,442,325
GMP #13
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 21
• Defer Maintenance Building to future phase
• Reduce depth of top soil
• Don’t line sewer manholes in CWF yard
• Do not import soil to balance site
• Select which general fund items are constructed
with this phase
Value Engineering
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 22
• Some value engineering items may not be realized
until after award due to public works bidding
Value Engineering
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 23
• Impact to Clean
Water Facility
Agenda
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 24
Clean Water Facility Financials
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 25
EXPENDITURES
CONTRACTED/ESTIMA
TED BUDGET
PROJECT TO
DATE ACTUAL BALANCE
ACQUISITIONS 3,396,325.69 3,351,387.42 44,938.27
ADMINISTRATION 692,852.01 461,262.01 231,590.00
CONSTRUCTION 116,738,780.95 75,301,350.80 41,437,430.15
FINANCE 258,638.16 216,172.66 42,465.50
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES – DESIGN 10,191,581.88 6,830,374.85 3,361,207.03
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES –
CONSTRUCTION 9,447,726.92 9,234,154.69 213,572.23
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 140,725,905.61 95,394,702.43 45,331,203.18
CASH SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 5,223,392.09 2,489,402.93 2,733,989.16
TOTAL FINANCING/TSFR 3,798,088.98 2,489,402.93 1,308,686.05
ESTIMATED CASH REMAINING 1,425,303.11 0.00 1,425,303.11
• Funding needed:
• Cash Available @ 3/31/18 $ 1,425,303
• Increase use of System Development + 1,000,000
• GMP #13 ($12,415,947 - $5,300,000) - 7,115,947
• Funds needed $ 4,690,644
Clean Water Facility
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 26
• Sewer Fund Cash Reserves
• $4,690,644 can be used from fund balance
• By using this it draws available balance from approx. $11.9M down to
$6.4M
• Reserved fund balance holds an additional $1.2M or 25% of expenditure
budget
How to pay for the increase
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 27
Windjammer Park – General Fund
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 28
FUNDING DETAIL 2017 2018 Proposed Total
Program Income in WJP 382,235 1,500 383,735
General Fund - Sales Tax 915,574 177,633 1,093,207
126 Community Park 212,731 50,824 263,555
127 Park Impact Fees 63,985 39,258 103,243
311 REET I 87,500 120,525 208,025
312 REET II 87,500 101,435 188,935
Legislative Grant 727,500 727,500
Total Funding 1,297,809 1,358,349 312,042 2,968,200
Budgeted Expenditures in
WJP 916,662
Cash Available 2,051,538
Full GMP#13 - GF
Portion 6,026,378
Funds Needed (3,974,840)
Windjammer Park - Optional Items
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 29
30
Feature Cost
Hardscape, Landscape, Electrical $1,704,067
Splash Park $941,784
West Kitchen $1,168,904
Pavilion Structure $698,820
Maintenance Building $876,013
Landscape Maintenance $32,135
Picnic Tables and Litter
Recepticals
$66,427
Windjammer Park - Optional Items
31
• Balance in Stability Fund (before 12/31/17 adjustment)
• $3,800,699
• Questions~
• How much should be left for the emergency fund?
• Are there any other Council priorities that the stability fund
might be used for?
• Should use be covered under OHMC 3.09?
Windjammer Park – Stability Fund?
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 32
Rates – January 2018 Estimated
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 33
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
2010 Base Case $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75 $72.85 $81.95 $92.20
2010 Ord 1587 $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75
March '16 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $118.17 $135.90
2016 Ord 1760 $77.70 $89.36 $102.76
Sept '16 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $110.98 $119.86
Jan '18 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $106.36 $110.08
$77.70
$89.36
$102.76 $106.36 $110.08
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
ResidentialUtilityRate
In January 2018, rates were checked
with current funding and an
Estimated Total Project Cost of
$140M
Rates – April 2018 Estimated
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 34
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
2010 Base Case $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75 $72.85 $81.95 $92.20
2010 Ord 1587 $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75
March '16 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $118.17 $135.90
2016 Ord 1760 $77.70 $89.36 $102.76
Sept '16 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $110.98 $119.86
Jan '18 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $106.36 $110.08
April '18 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $107.38 $117.27
$77.70
$89.36
$102.76
$107.38
$117.27
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
ResidentialUtilityRate
Rates have been checked with
current funding and an Estimated
Total Project Cost of $147M
• Previously we planned to use Sewer Fund Balance for rate
stabilization during this rate analysis
• Expenditures were planned to exceed rate revenue and to
use the fund balance so rates would not be artificially
increased until fund balance was brought down
• The use of fund balance to cover GMP #13 bid amounts
could create a need for rate increase between 2020-2023
Rate Structure
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 35
• Things to keep in mind:
• This is a check-in – when the project is completed we will use
actual cost to determine rates
• There won’t be changes to the rate structure until the CWF
project is completed
• The estimated Operating & Maintenance Budget is a
conservative projection
Impact on Rates
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 36
• Continued…..
• If there is a growth in the customer base it may offset the need
for a rate increase
• Debt service is required to be 1.25x debt service coverage and
we have that estimated as covered through 2020
• Further detail will be provided by Shawn Koorn on 5/1/2018
Impact on Rates
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 37
• FAQ
Agenda
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 38
• What happens if we delay GMP #13
• Schedule delays (delayed CO)
• Increased cost
• May need to rebid
• Material costs could go up
• Change orders on existing GMPs
• Mobilization / de-mobilization required to work in 2019
What do we do?
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 39
• Discussion
Agenda
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 40
• Staff will proceed with VE efforts
• Discuss potential funding sources
• Ideas on how to fund optional items
Discussion
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 41
• Continue to seek ways to keep project cost and
rates down
• Continue communicating with community
Next Steps
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 42
What to Expect in 2018
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 43
Questions?
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 44
4/11/2018City Council Workshop 45

Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment #13

  • 1.
    Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment#13 City Council Workshop – April 11, 2018
  • 2.
    • Purpose • GMP#13 overview • Windjammer Park • Funding and Procurement Strategy • GMP #13 Cost • Impact to Clean Water Facility • FAQ Agenda 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 2
  • 3.
    • Update CityCouncil on the development of GMP #13 • Discuss the overlap between the CWF and Park Improvements • Discuss the cost development for GMP #13 • CWF project cost impacts / rate impacts • Discuss Windjammer Park Phase 1 options Purpose 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 3
  • 4.
    • GMP #13overview Agenda 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 4
  • 5.
    • GMP #13includes the following elements • Clean Water Facility Improvements (Must Have Items) • Mitigation / Restoration • Fencing • Paving • Water Main • Demolition • Windjammer Park Phase 1 improvements (Implement Windjammer Park Integration Plan) Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment #13 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 5
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    10 Decembe r 2015 Januar y 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May/ June 2016 Counciland CAG Process • Provide feedback on 3 concept alternatives • Present WPIP concept to community • Gather community feedback (Public Open House and Online Open House) • Review preferred plan to be presented to City Council • Provide final feedback • CAG forms • CAG provides feedback on design guidelines • Introduce CAG and WPIP to community • Gather community feedback (Public Open House) COUNCIL • Programming priorities • Approves CAG COUNCIL Report: Alternatives and Public feedback COUNCIL Approves plan COUNCIL CAG formation update and initial priorities list/ design guidelines 4/11/2018              City Council Workshop
  • 11.
    What We Heard 4/11/201811 • “Given” elements must be included (e.g. – restrooms, kitchens, parking, playgrounds, waterfront trail, sport courts) • Family-friendly elements should be prioritized • Current RV park standards are not an efficient use of the park space • Views of the water are important • The ballfields should be relocated in the long term City Council Workshop
  • 12.
    Proposed Phase 1 4/11/2018 12 OriginalPhase 1 To include part of Phase 2 & 3
  • 13.
    Windjammer Park Phase1 4/11/2018 13 • Includes Clean Water Facility mitigation and restoration • November 15, 2016 – City Council amended Carollo’s contract to include design
  • 14.
    Windjammer Park Phase1 Open House 1 4/11/2018 14 • 167 community members attended in-person and online open houses in January 2017 • 97 community members provided input on park character and theme City Council Workshop
  • 15.
    What We Heard 4/11/201815 • Highest priority elements are restrooms, walkways, a nature play area, park furnishings, and a splash park • Participants preferred a natural, simple aesthetic • Park spaces should be flexible and multi-purpose • Thoughts on style inspirations for specific elements City Council Workshop
  • 16.
    Windjammer Park Phase1 Open House 2 4/11/2018 16 • 290 community members attended in-person and online open houses in August/September 2017 • 79 community members provided general comments, thoughts on the park design, and priorities for future park phases City Council Workshop
  • 17.
    What We Heard 4/11/201817 • Excitement for the splash park • Appreciation for the future park’s design aesthetic • Requests to add pickle ball courts City Council Workshop
  • 18.
    • Funding andProcurement Strategy Agenda 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 18
  • 19.
    • Both Sewerand General Funds will be used • How do we distinguish which fund pays for what? • 7 bid packages • Base Bid = Sewer Fund • Bid Alternates = General Fund Funding and Procurement Strategy 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 19
  • 20.
    • GMP #13Cost Agenda 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 20
  • 21.
    Element Sewer FundGeneral Fund Total Bid Items $8,072,220 $3,764,023 $11,836,243 Self Performed $1,169,774 $814,694 $1,984,468 NSS $223,156 $275,093 $498,249 Sub-total $9,465,150 $4,853,810 $14,318,960 GMP Risk Contingency @ 3.0% $283,955 $145,614 $429,569 Owner Design Contingency @ 2.0% $189,303 $97,076 $286,379 GMP #10 Allowance Adjustment $850,000 $0 $850,000 Specified General Conditions $165,000 $220,000 $385,000 Sub-total $10,953,408 $5,316,500 $16,269,908 GCCM Fee @ 4.28% $468,806 $227,546 $696,352 GMP Sub-total $11,422,214 $5,544,046 $16,966,260 Sales Tax @ 8.7% $993,733 $482,332 $1,476,065 GMP #13 Total w/Sales Tax $12,415,947 $6,026,378 $18,442,325 GMP #13 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 21
  • 22.
    • Defer MaintenanceBuilding to future phase • Reduce depth of top soil • Don’t line sewer manholes in CWF yard • Do not import soil to balance site • Select which general fund items are constructed with this phase Value Engineering 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 22
  • 23.
    • Some valueengineering items may not be realized until after award due to public works bidding Value Engineering 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 23
  • 24.
    • Impact toClean Water Facility Agenda 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 24
  • 25.
    Clean Water FacilityFinancials 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 25 EXPENDITURES CONTRACTED/ESTIMA TED BUDGET PROJECT TO DATE ACTUAL BALANCE ACQUISITIONS 3,396,325.69 3,351,387.42 44,938.27 ADMINISTRATION 692,852.01 461,262.01 231,590.00 CONSTRUCTION 116,738,780.95 75,301,350.80 41,437,430.15 FINANCE 258,638.16 216,172.66 42,465.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES – DESIGN 10,191,581.88 6,830,374.85 3,361,207.03 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES – CONSTRUCTION 9,447,726.92 9,234,154.69 213,572.23 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 140,725,905.61 95,394,702.43 45,331,203.18 CASH SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 5,223,392.09 2,489,402.93 2,733,989.16 TOTAL FINANCING/TSFR 3,798,088.98 2,489,402.93 1,308,686.05 ESTIMATED CASH REMAINING 1,425,303.11 0.00 1,425,303.11
  • 26.
    • Funding needed: •Cash Available @ 3/31/18 $ 1,425,303 • Increase use of System Development + 1,000,000 • GMP #13 ($12,415,947 - $5,300,000) - 7,115,947 • Funds needed $ 4,690,644 Clean Water Facility 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 26
  • 27.
    • Sewer FundCash Reserves • $4,690,644 can be used from fund balance • By using this it draws available balance from approx. $11.9M down to $6.4M • Reserved fund balance holds an additional $1.2M or 25% of expenditure budget How to pay for the increase 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 27
  • 28.
    Windjammer Park –General Fund 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 28 FUNDING DETAIL 2017 2018 Proposed Total Program Income in WJP 382,235 1,500 383,735 General Fund - Sales Tax 915,574 177,633 1,093,207 126 Community Park 212,731 50,824 263,555 127 Park Impact Fees 63,985 39,258 103,243 311 REET I 87,500 120,525 208,025 312 REET II 87,500 101,435 188,935 Legislative Grant 727,500 727,500 Total Funding 1,297,809 1,358,349 312,042 2,968,200 Budgeted Expenditures in WJP 916,662 Cash Available 2,051,538 Full GMP#13 - GF Portion 6,026,378 Funds Needed (3,974,840)
  • 29.
    Windjammer Park -Optional Items 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 29
  • 30.
  • 31.
    Feature Cost Hardscape, Landscape,Electrical $1,704,067 Splash Park $941,784 West Kitchen $1,168,904 Pavilion Structure $698,820 Maintenance Building $876,013 Landscape Maintenance $32,135 Picnic Tables and Litter Recepticals $66,427 Windjammer Park - Optional Items 31
  • 32.
    • Balance inStability Fund (before 12/31/17 adjustment) • $3,800,699 • Questions~ • How much should be left for the emergency fund? • Are there any other Council priorities that the stability fund might be used for? • Should use be covered under OHMC 3.09? Windjammer Park – Stability Fund? 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 32
  • 33.
    Rates – January2018 Estimated 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 33 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2010 Base Case $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75 $72.85 $81.95 $92.20 2010 Ord 1587 $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75 March '16 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $118.17 $135.90 2016 Ord 1760 $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 Sept '16 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $110.98 $119.86 Jan '18 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $106.36 $110.08 $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $106.36 $110.08 $- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 ResidentialUtilityRate In January 2018, rates were checked with current funding and an Estimated Total Project Cost of $140M
  • 34.
    Rates – April2018 Estimated 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 34 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2010 Base Case $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75 $72.85 $81.95 $92.20 2010 Ord 1587 $40.00 $42.00 $47.00 $52.00 $57.50 $64.75 March '16 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $118.17 $135.90 2016 Ord 1760 $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 Sept '16 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $110.98 $119.86 Jan '18 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $106.36 $110.08 April '18 Estimate $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $107.38 $117.27 $77.70 $89.36 $102.76 $107.38 $117.27 $- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 ResidentialUtilityRate Rates have been checked with current funding and an Estimated Total Project Cost of $147M
  • 35.
    • Previously weplanned to use Sewer Fund Balance for rate stabilization during this rate analysis • Expenditures were planned to exceed rate revenue and to use the fund balance so rates would not be artificially increased until fund balance was brought down • The use of fund balance to cover GMP #13 bid amounts could create a need for rate increase between 2020-2023 Rate Structure 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 35
  • 36.
    • Things tokeep in mind: • This is a check-in – when the project is completed we will use actual cost to determine rates • There won’t be changes to the rate structure until the CWF project is completed • The estimated Operating & Maintenance Budget is a conservative projection Impact on Rates 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 36
  • 37.
    • Continued….. • Ifthere is a growth in the customer base it may offset the need for a rate increase • Debt service is required to be 1.25x debt service coverage and we have that estimated as covered through 2020 • Further detail will be provided by Shawn Koorn on 5/1/2018 Impact on Rates 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 37
  • 38.
  • 39.
    • What happensif we delay GMP #13 • Schedule delays (delayed CO) • Increased cost • May need to rebid • Material costs could go up • Change orders on existing GMPs • Mobilization / de-mobilization required to work in 2019 What do we do? 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 39
  • 40.
  • 41.
    • Staff willproceed with VE efforts • Discuss potential funding sources • Ideas on how to fund optional items Discussion 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 41
  • 42.
    • Continue toseek ways to keep project cost and rates down • Continue communicating with community Next Steps 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 42
  • 43.
    What to Expectin 2018 4/11/2018City Council Workshop 43
  • 44.
  • 45.

Editor's Notes

  • #3 This presentation will share updates since our last cost discussion in April.
  • #5 This presentation will share updates since our last cost discussion in April.
  • #16 Much of the feedback confirmed project team assumptions Highest priority elements are restrooms, walkways, a nature play area, park furnishings, and a splash park Participants preferred a natural, simple aesthetic Park spaces should be flexible and multi-purpose Thoughts on style inspirations for the plaza, splash park, nature play area, wind shelters, kitchens, restrooms, walkways, and furnishings
  • #18 Much of the feedback confirmed project team assumptions Highest priority elements are restrooms, walkways, a nature play area, park furnishings, and a splash park Participants preferred a natural, simple aesthetic Park spaces should be flexible and multi-purpose Thoughts on style inspirations for the plaza, splash park, nature play area, wind shelters, kitchens, restrooms, walkways, and furnishings