This document summarizes discussions from two design workshops regarding the Oak Harbor Clean Water Facility project. The workshops gathered community input on conceptual site plans and architectural designs. Key themes from participants included a campus-style layout with varied building heights and roof lines that complement the surrounding park and harbor views. Participants also emphasized using natural materials, increasing windows, and incorporating educational areas to blend the facility into the community. The project team will continue design refinement and seek additional public input in August.
10. • Governed by code
• In general, building height is defined as the vertical distance
from the average natural grade level to the highest point of
a roof.
• Structures excluded from building height code:
• Housing of elevators, stairways, etc.
• Parapet walls
• Skylights, towers, and similar structures
Building Height
6/17/2015 10
11. • Governed by design guidelines [Clarify who’s guidelines,
City?]
• No interval of a roof line shall be unbroken for greater than
100 feet for sloped roofs or 50 feet for flat roofs
Building Height Appearance
6/17/2015 11
13. • Engages broad spectrum of community perspectives
• Helps to develop ideas for the architectural “look and feel”
• Supports early design work through small group in-depth
discussions with design team
Why a Design Charrette Group?
6/17/2015 13
14. • Press release, email notification, and website update
announced the formation of group
• Approximately 15 community members were asked
• 3 at-large positions available
• Group was selected by City staff to represent the
community
Workshop Group Formation
6/17/2015 14
15. • 12 members, including 3 at-large positions representing:
Workshop Group Formation
6/17/2015 15
Arts Commission
Economic Development
Main Street Association
Chamber of Commerce
Planning Commission
Parks Department
Dillard’s Addition
Peoples Bank
Oak Harbor School District
Condo Association
Community members
Whidbey Island Marathon
Landscape architect
Interest in architecture
16. Design Charrette 1 – November 13, 2014
6/17/2015 16
• Learn about the civil engineering associated with the project
(which dictates height and size of buildings)
• Provide insight into Oak Harbor’s existing architectural
character
• Help narrow choices for architectural design of the new
Clean Water Facility
18. Wastewater Treatment Facility – South Korea
6/17/2015 18
“I like this photo because they have implemented fitness
equipment in front of the building. Their use of color
matches the scenery and provides nice detail and interest”
“I really appreciate again the way
this building blends in to the
scenery with color and natural
landscaping. The concrete
designs are interesting and
modern. ”
Charrette Group Homework Images
19. Keybank on Pioneer Way
6/17/2015 19
“I like the low profile on the roof line and
the windows around the top. It has a feeling
of openness and air. It draws you in.”
Oak Harbor Transit Station on
Bayshore Drive
“These buildings look like they have been
here for ever, that they belong. They are
reminiscent of farm or out buildings and tie
into the community well.”
Harbor Station on 7th Ave and Highway 20
“These structures are
probably some of the
newest in Oak Harbor.
They look fresh and
interesting. The varying
heights and surfaces
keep your eyes engaged.”
20. 6/17/2015 20
“Straight lines, lots of light, some intrigue with
the different heights and the face that you can
see into the building and what is happening
there.”
North Whidbey Middle School
“(I like this) because it appears very
structurally sound, as well as eye-
appealing.”
21. • Facility should set the stage for a community design aesthetic
• A combination of both a campus and a courtyard with higher priority on campus
• Regional design as an architectural aesthetic, incorporate both contemporary and
traditional NW architecture
• Open and light, enhance sight lines to water, park, and windmill
• Allow for community interaction with facility, include educational features
• Varying heights of roof lines
• Provide “camouflaging” – it should not advertise that it’s a sewage treatment plant
• Integrate with surroundings – Windjammer Park, harbor area, downtown
Design Themes from Charrette 1
6/17/2015 21
22. Design Charrette 2 – May 6, 2015
6/17/2015 22
• Check back on incorporation of group feedback for
proposed architectural concept for the new Oak Harbor
Clean Water Facility, furthering design team’s work.
• Gather additional feedback on design refinements
• Narrow options for landscape and hardscape to integrate
into the Windjammer Park setting
31. • Campus concept
• Open and light
• Potential to increase use of windows
• Enhancing sightlines to the water, park, and windmill is
beginning to take shape
• Varying heights of rooflines
• Some buildings are approaching maximum height per code. Potential to use
landscape or roofed kiosks to.
Design Themes from Charrette 2
6/17/2015 31
32. • “Camouflaging” the wastewater treatment facility
• Community interaction with the facility with educational or
interpretive features
• Set the stage for a community design aesthetic and the tone
for Oak Harbor's downtown corridor
Design Themes from Charrette 2
6/17/2015 32
33. • City Beach corner as a gateway into the facility and park
• Façade into smaller sections, if possible
• Sightlines and views of the water and windmill
• Opportunities for respite or cover for pedestrians City Beach
corner as a gateway into the facility and park
• Façade into smaller sections, if possible
• Sightlines and views of the water and windmill
• Opportunities for respite or cover for pedestrians
Continuing Design Work
6/17/2015 33
34. • Team continues to develop design concepts
• Public meeting in August to share updated design ideas and
gather input from the community
• Additional opportunities for Council and public input as
design develops
Next Steps for Design
6/17/2015 34
Editor's Notes
Introductions
BRIAN
BRIAN
BRIAN
BRIAN
BRIAN
BRIAN
BRIAN
STEVE
STEVE
average natural grade shall be defined as the average elevation of the highest corners and the lowest corners of the lot or parcel
Building Height is defined as the vertical distance from the average natural grade level to the highest point of a roof. Which means it’s the highest point of:
The coping, or raised edge of a flat roof [provide example]
The deck line of a mansard roof [provide example]
The average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof [provide example]
The structures noted may exceed height limits:
If not used for providing additional floor space
Up to 10 feet above the height limit of the district,
More than 10 feet requires approval as a conditional use by the hearing examiner
STEVE
JOE
JOE
Set the context of the design charrette and why the group was convened.
Reinforce this is one of many ways the project will gather design input from the community.
JOE
Announced formation of the group on the website, via email, and with a press release.
Included in announcement was how the group would be formed and the opportunity for community members to express interest and request to participate.
Participation in the group was a large commitment. To apply for at-large positions we asked people to tell us why they wanted to participate and what their background/interest was. Group members had to commit time outside of the workshop to read about the project and gather homework images.
JOE
Explain the community organizations/groups represented by the charrette members.
JOE
Review purpose of charrette 1
JOE
“Campus” Layout
Buildings are designed to appear as separate structures around/throughout the site
Walls and/or fences connect buildings
“Courtyard” Layout
Buildings are designed to appear as integrated structure (i.e. a common exterior façade)
Exterior façade becomes background for activities in the Park and around the facility
NOTE: These 2 concepts can “stand alone” or can be combined into an overall theme for the facility
JOE
We asked the charrette group to send us images that, to them, reflected the character of Oak Harbor or buildings/design they found exciting/inspirational. Along with the image we asked them to share what about the photo resonated.
Share selection from group (not all homework is shown)
JOE
JOE
JOE
Review key themes and take-aways from charrette 1.
JOE
Review purpose of charrette 2
JOE
Came back to the group with concepts that reflected the group’s themes and discussions from the first charrette.
JOE
JOE
JOE
JOE
Introduced early landscape concepts
JOE
JOE
JOE
JOE
Review key themes and take-aways from charrette 2.
JOE
JOE
JOE
Thank the charrette group for their commitment and hard work. Also thank the members of the public that have shared their thoughts as the team continues to develop the design of the facility. The team is looking forward to bringing our updated ideas for the architectural look and feel of the facility to the broader public at our community meeting in August.