The document provides a summary of Daniel Hyde's FMP evaluation. It discusses the various stages of the project, including research on podcasts, planning the story layout, time management issues, and technical qualities of using audio files. Feedback was received from peers, praising the sound effects but noting some voices were less distinct and that more dialogue could have added depth. In response, Daniel agrees the project was fast-paced but would have benefited from a visual to accompany the audio, and disagrees there was an issue with the number of voice lines. With more time, a visual and longer version would have been created.

1. FMP Evaluation
Daniel Hyde

2. Production Process Evaluation

3. Research
My research helped me to collect examples of Podcasts. This helped because
some of the podcasts had sound effects in them.
For example CoxnCrendor
I could have added an audio clip from each podcast to re listen to on my
research powerpoint.

4. Planning
My planning helped because I was able to find the base layout for a story

5. Time Management
I finished my product but It wasn’t on time, If I had more time I would have
been able to finish it on time

6. Technical Qualities
Because they are audio files I can’t show them.
I listened to another story and mine is the only
one I have found to have sound effects and
music during the entire story.

7. Aural Qualities
I love how my project sounds, It was definitely
creative.

8. Audience Appeal
I feel my product will appeal to the original audience of kamen rider build because it is set in the
same universe and it has a similar feeling to the original

9. Peer
Feedback

10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
Sounded great, sound effect were definitely
evocative, seems a shame it was only audio,
would have loved to see a visual. Typical of the
genre though.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
Some of the voices were a little less distinct than
others. Otherwise a great sound.

11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
Fast paced and exciting
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
More dialogue would give a bit more depth to the
story

12. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
I agree that it was fast paced and would have been
better with a visual
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
I thought there was enough voice lines all together

13. Peer Feedback Summary
If I had more time I would have made a visual
representation and made it longer.