The Yugoslavian Conflict Essay

The Yugoslavian Conflict Essay
The Yugoslavian Conflict
Yugoslavia is a country burdened by feuding sides in a war that cannot soon be resolved. The United Nations are attempting to help the situation, but
until the people of Yugoslavia can come to an agreement continued warfare and heartache is inevitable.
The problems in Yugoslaviabegan because the country is separated into two distinct parts. The north and west parts of the country were once under the
rule of the Austro–Hungarian Empire, and the south and the east were controlled by the Ottoman Empire. This had extreme effects on the ethnic,
cultural and economic differences between the two sides. The three major religions in Yugoslavia were Greek Orthodox, Christianity, Roman
Catholicism, and Islam. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The whole affair was organized as military support to the federal police and customs personnel. The
Slovenians offered strong resistance with their territorial defense units, politically organized the withdrawal of their representatives from the
presidency and the Executive Council of Yugoslavia, and directed a massive propaganda campaign presenting themselves as victims of brutal
Yugoslavian
National Army aggression.
Croatia also attempted to claim independence, but they had a problem that the Slovenians didn't have to deal with. They had a large population of
Serbians in Croatia and with the new laws that the Croatian government tried to impose the minority Serbians were given no rights as a minority and
were forced to go by the new found Croatian law. This caused conflicts inside Croatia between the Serbian rebels and the Croatian National Guard
who tried to keep order. Many of these conflicts left many people dead and wounded. The
Yugoslavian National Army (JNA) openly sided with the Serbian rebels, the
Croatians used this opportunity to start an all out anti–JNA campaign. The JNA responded by saying that it took orders from the Presidency of
Yugoslavia, not from Tudjman, the Croatian leader, and that it was constitutionally obliged to protect the integrity of the country and to preserve peace
when it was endangered. Tudjman put all army units in Croatia on highest alert and ordered to shoot back if shot at. The fighting
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Ike Kennedy: The Bosnian Genocide
The Bosnian Genocide Ike Kennedy Genocides are nation crippling events that in most cases begin by unreasonable aggressive ideas or behaviors,
which result in many lives of men, women, and children of all ages killed senselessly. These absurd acts of horror occur too frequently in the history
of mankind, with one of the most significant genocides such as the Holocaust, which occurred in the European nation of Germany. A much more
recently relevant genocide took place on another part of the European continent called the Bosnian genocide. The genocide in Bosnia is relatively
unique, yet it was an extremely tragic event that crippled the population of Bosnia and marked its history forever. Herzegovina Bosnia is a small
country in Europe, bordering... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Yugoslav population was originally a collection of many different ethnic groups, as well as religious groups; most of which were aggrieved
rivals, possibly even enemies, with a long and dense history. The majority of Yugoslavia people were Serbs, mainly Orthodox Christians, Croats,
mostly Catholics, and Albanian ethnic groups who were predominantly Muslims. During World War 2, German Nazis invaded then divided
Yugoslavia, however, at the end of WW2 when Germans later accepted the defeat communist leader Josip Tito reunified Yugoslavia. Over the years,
the hostility and bitterness of rival ethnic and religious groups sharing the same country were spreading and brewing until a civil war broke out in the
early 1990s. Bosnia seceded from Yugoslavia and became an independent nation in 1992. Many of Bosnia's population was made up of Muslims, while
the Serbians became the minority, accounting for approximately 32% of the Bosnian

The Tragedy Of The Bosnian Genocide
Reflections about major significant historical occurrences often lead to a philosophical inquiry as to whether the outcome could have been changed.
Often inspired by unfortunate events, historians may never know if they could have been prevented. Genocides are an example of such an event, as
they are often influenced by delicate situations, and are often very tragic. The deepest tragedy of all is that we will never know if these mass murders
of specific ethnicities could have been averted. One such dreadful occurrence became known to the public as the Bosnian Genocide. Lasting from 1992
till 1995, the Bosnian Genocide erupted after the ruination of Yugoslavia. Yugoslavia was a communist government that was formed in 1929 from
several... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By 1991, emboldened by the absence of a unifying figurehead, several provinces declared their independence from Yugoslavia, which was now in
ruins. Croatia, Serbia, and Slovenia all officially formed their own nations in 1991. Slobodan Milosevic had taken control of Serbia in 1987, which
was largest by land area, and inspired strong nationalist feelings in Serbs. In 1992, Bosnia declared its independence as well. Bosnia was composed
of several ethnicities, including the Bosnian Muslims (Bosniaks), who were the majority, Bosnian Serbs, and Bosnian Croats. Savo Heleta, who was
living in Bosnia at the time, described the ethnic boundaries in her book, Not My Turn To Die: "...there were no clear–cut boundaries– there weren't
three different regions, one for each ethnic group. People lived in ethnically mixed cities, villages, neighborhoods, and apartment buildings." The
presence of borders may have prevented the genocide, and at least it might have softened the degree and severity of the killings. Boundaries might
have been able to allow the ethnicities to split peacefully and without forcing anyone out of the area or out of the world. The declaration of Bosnian
independence was not received favourably by the Serbs. Since Bosnia, in 1991, was composed of forty–four percent Bosniaks, thirty–one percent Serb,
and seventeen percent Croat. Due to the clear majority of the Bosniaks, the Serbs had fears about

The Yugoslav Wars: The Greatest Conflicts Since World War...
Known as Europe's deadliest conflict since World War II, the Yugoslav Wars (also known as the Wars of Yugoslav Succession, the Yugoslav Civil
War, or the War in the Balkans) were a series of wars fought in the former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s. Though the entire conflict can be divided up
into four distinct wars, they are related due to their common origin and the presence of the same ethnoreligious groups in the multiple wars. These wars
have become notorious due to the atrocious war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by all sides.
To better understand the atrocities of these wars, one must have knowledge of the definitions of certain terms and war crimes. The ideas of "ethnic
cleansing" and "genocide" are often thrown ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, these wars cannot be fully understood without a basic knowledge of the former Yugoslavia. Formally known as the Soviet Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia, it was a federation that was comprised of six socialist republics: Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro,
Serbia and Slovenia. Additionally, two autonomous provinces, Vojvodina andKosovo, were established in Serbia. Many different ethnic groups called
Yugoslavia home, namely theSerbs, Croats, Slovenes, Bosniaks, Albanians, and Montenegrins. However, the presence of large ethnic minorities across
republic lines made things complicated, especially with the advent of rising nationalism among these different peoples. The borders of the republics
had originally been of little significance; Josip Tito, the beloved leader of the Communist Party in Yugoslavia, decided the borders with little opposition
from anyone, as the federation was supposed to be a centralized "dictatorship of the proletariat". Only with later decentralization and democratization
would any concern for the individual republics and nationalities be voiced and nationalism become an issue. Tito's death in 1980 seemed to suddenly
remind all the Yugoslav peoples that they had in fact retained their separate ethnic identities and that the ethnic identity of Tito's successor would
certainly affect them, whether positively or negatively, and inter–republic relations began deteriorating quickly. Tito and his communist

The Conflict Between Dinamo Zagreb And Red Star
Yugoslavia in the 20th century underwent great political turmoil, unrest, war, and ethnic conflicts. Throughout the existence of this unstable nation,
soccer was the most popular sport with the most devout supporters. The sport and its various teams held strong ties to the political structure of
Yugoslavia, being run and controlled often by government institutions. It is for this reason that soccer inYugoslaviacan serve as a political barometer
to understand the underlying concerns, ideologies, and conflicts that occurred in the country in the 20th century. Not does the sport mimic the
political history of the nation, it was often tied directly to political parties and ideologies. This essay will look into the inception, rise, and eventual
demise of Yugoslavia through the perspective of soccer and its role in all of it. In particular, the focus will be on the most popular teams in present day
Serbia, Red Star Belgrade and FK Partizan and their rivalry, as well as the role of the Bosnian club Velez. Furthermore, the clash between Dinamo
Zagreb and Red Star will be shown as a catalyst for the following war of independence. Some contrast to the division and antagonism will be shown
by looking closely at the Yugoslav national team following World War II.
Initially one must look to politically charged club teams in Yugoslavia, such as Red Star Belgrade and FK Partizan. The history of these teams and
their formation is important to consider. At the end of World War II, most

Raphael Lemkin's Radov Architect Of The Bosnian Genocide
Raphael Lemkin coined the word genocide and lobbied for his entire life to have the world prevent as well as punish genocide. Eventually, in 1948,
the United Nations adopted Lemkin's work and promised to prevent genocide from happening again, but they failed on several occasions, most notably
in 1992, when a genocide was carried out in Bosnia. This genocide was orchestrated by Radovan KaradЕѕiД‡. Robert Donia's book, Radovan
KaradzМЊicМЃ: Architect of the Bosnian Genocide, goes into chronicling the life of Radovan KaradЕѕiД‡ and seeks to understand how he went from
a "man of great ability and immense promise," to eventually transform "himself into the architect of the worst atrocities in Europe since the Second
World War by unequivocally embracing... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, three genocides took place throughout the world and nothing was done to prevent it, making Lemkin a failure. That being said, KaradЕѕiД‡'s
trial was a great triumph for the United Nations and was "likened to the Nuremberg trials of former Nazi leaders." Many decades have passed since
the world agreed to Lemkin's idea to stop this atrocious crime. Radovan KaradЕѕiД‡'s trial caused a turning point for the world because genocide was
finally being punished. It may have reminded the world of the forgotten promise they made back in 1948. KaradЕѕiД‡'s trial proved that the world
would punish this evil crime, thus upholding the protection of human rights. In addition, this ultimately "marked the first ever genocide conviction in
Europe" and fulfilled Lemkin's life–long goal. If another sinister deed is executed that involves the mass–extermination of a group of people, there is
hope that the United Nations will carry out Lemkin's dream of preventing it and bringing those responsible–like KaradЕѕiД‡–to

Yugoslavia War Research Paper
Often termed as Europe's deadliest since World War II, the Yugoslavia War has been infamous for the war crimes, which include ethnic cleansing,
crimes against humanity and rape. These wars supplemented and aided the weathering of the Yugoslav state, when its constituent republics declared
independence, but the issues of ethnic minorities in the new countries (chiefly Serbs, Croats and Albanians) were still unsettled at the time the republics
were accepted internationally. The International Criminal Tribunal for the formerYugoslavia(ICTY) was established by the United Nations to prosecute
these crimes. According to the International Centre for Transitional Justice, the Yugoslavia War led to the deaths of 140,000 people.
The research paper ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Serbia secured four out of eight federal presidency votes and was able to heavily influence decision–making at the federal level, since all the other
Yugoslav republics only had one vote. While Slovenia and Croatia wanted to allow a multi–party system, Serbia, led by MiloЕЎeviД‡, demanded an
even more centralized federation and Serbia's dominant role in it. At the 14th Extraordinary Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia in
January 1990, the Serbian–dominated assembly agreed to abolish the single–party system; however, Slobodan MiloЕЎeviД‡, the head of the Serbian
Party branch (League of Communists of Serbia) used his influence to block and vote–down all other proposals from the Croatian and Slovene party
delegates. This prompted the Croatian and Slovene delegations to walk out and thus the break–up of the party, a symbolic event representing the end of
"brotherhood and

Bosnia Herzegovin A Rough History
Body: Bosnia–Herzegovina has a rough history, especially with its neighboring countries. Tensions in the Balkans increased after World War II.
Bosnia–Herzegovina went from a prime example of cultural unity to the exact opposite due to the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Yugoslavia was created
at the end of World War I, when Bosnian, Croat, and Slovenian territories joined that of the Serbian Empire. Yugoslavia was split up during World
War II, but was once again unified at the end by Josip Broz Tito. Due to cultural differences, remembrance of WWII events, and the death of Josip
Broz Tito, Yugoslavia, once again, broke up in the early 1990s. My parents were born and raised in different parts of Yugoslavia, but with the
break–up of Yugoslavia, and wars that followed between Bosnia and Serbia, my parents had to escape to Germany (where my brother and I would
soon be born). Growing up I always heard about how great it was to live in a Yugoslavia that was ruled by Josip Broz Tito, it was a place where
people got along with one another. However, that would soon change. In an essay written by Alan Fraser, he describes the conditions of Yugoslavia
during the time of unity. In his opening sentence he says "the first thing I noticed about Yugoslavia was the ease and honesty, the trust people had for
each other, treating one another like family." The quote speaks volumes, especially coming from a foreigner to the region. Yugoslavia was truly a place
where everyone got along with one

Yugoslavia Essay
One of the youngest nations of Europe, Yugoslavia was created after World War I as a homeland for several different rival ethnic groups. The country
was put together mostly from remnants of the collapsed Ottoman Empire and Austria–Hungary. Demands for self–determination by Slovenes, Croats,
Serbs, and others were ignored. Yugoslavia thus became an uneasy association of peoples conditioned by centuries of ethnic and religious hatreds.
World War II aggravated these rivalries, but Communist dictatorship after the war controlled them for 45 years. When the Communist system failed,
the old rivalries reasserted themselves; and in the early 1990s the nation was rent by secessionist movements and civil war. Within several years these
conflicts... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
     The mountainous nature of the country causes considerable climatic differences from one place to another. The
Dalmatian coast has a typical Mediterranean climate with hot, dry summers and mild, rainy winters. The Mid–Danube Plain has a continental climate
with cold winters, hot summers, and moderate precipitation. The mountain regions have on the whole colder and shorter summers and more severe
winters compared with other regions.      The major environment hazard in Yugoslovia is earthquakes. The whole
region is subject to earthquakes of considerable severity, and in 1963 the city of Skopje was almost entirely destroyed by one.
     Yugoslavia has numerous deposits of lignite, or brown coal, exist, but there is little good–grade black coal. There
are some small petroleum and natural gas field. The major source of energy is waterpower, which provides about one third of the country's electricity.
Yugoslavia is a major European producer of lead and copper. Other minerals include iron ore, zinc, silver, gold, nickel, mercury, and antimony.
     About 37 percent of the country is forest covered. The predominant species are oak, beech, and other deciduous
trees, with such evergreens as pine and fir in the mountains. The soils of the Mid–Danube Plain are the best in the country for farming.

The Major Causes Of The Bosnian Civil War
Since the end of World War Two, no conflict in Europe was as barbarous as the Civil War that took place in Bosnia, formerly known as Yugoslavia. In
1992, Bosnians officially declared their independence from Yugoslavia erupting the whole territory into a brutal conflict that left nearly 100,000 dead
and 2.2 million displaced people. This disastrous ethnic cleansing involved the breakup of Yugoslavia into six smaller states including: Slovenia,
Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Macedonia. Upon this division of Yugoslavia, the Bosnians and Croats were able to gain independence
from the Serbs through international backing and militaristic strategic advantages from organizations such as the UN and NATO. The main cause of
the Bosnian ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also, during this time "Ethnic Fault Lines" were created resulting in stronger violence along these areas. Reference the attached map of Yugoslavia in
the Cited Sources section to view the map of ethnic majorities within the Yugoslavian region. This is a perfect example of how all the ethnicities were
spread out across the region and not simply contained to one area allowing for the violent ethnic fault lines. Along with the historical perspective of
ethnic tensions causing nationalism in Yugoslavia, new evidence from historians have shown that the Bosnian Civil War was not a one
–time deal in
the area. This had been considered a very active region, in the case of violence, during the 20th century making some historians to think that this
conflict was bound to happen as it had occurred various other times in the past. Historically, another reason for the ethnic tensions occurred due to the
fall of Communism. Although this is somewhat indirect, different ethnicities side with different governmental views causing deeper tensions to rise
after the vacuum of the major world power in the Eastern Europe region. As stated earlier, Slobodan Milosevic believed he could push his agenda
without any international policing of his actions due to the recent fall of communism and power vacuum. On this note, governmental influences are
also another way that nationalism caused the Bosnian Civil War. Next, governmental influences, in not only the physical

What Caused The Bosnian Genocide
The genocide in Bosnia ended in 1995 with a peace agreement which stopped the war. This peace treaty was negotiated in Dayton, Ohio and
signed in Paris. In July of 1996, West forces Karadzic to quit as the Bosnian Serb president who was in office for roughly four years. The war in
Bosnia created two states: the Serb Republic and the Bosnian Federation. One of the many struggles that survivors faced were that they did not know
where their loved ones met or were buried. During the genocide, mass barryings were conducted and many loved ones were dislocated and lost when
the government buried all the bodies after the war. In an attempt to cover up the mass graves, the government dug up the graves and scattered the
graves which made it even harder

Bosnian Genocide And Holocaust Similarities
Genocide is one of the worst inventions man has made. More formally known as massacres before the early 1900s(Cooke–welling 69), they have
always been very harmful to an ethnicity or religions' growth. The word itself originates from latin roots. The words "whole" and "burned" in latin
morph to make the word "holocaust" A few of the worst ones in history have happened in just the past century. One that is very familiar isThe
Holocaust. It was the genocide of the Jewish faith during World War II by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party("The Holocaust"). Hitler believed that the
aryan race was germans with specific beliefs and features. Jews did not fall into this category and were thought to be harmful in the process of making
a perfect race, so ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many examples in history show multiple times where people have banded together to fight for the common good, but they might always notice
how bad it actually in. This is what happened in the Bosnian genocide with the world. Nobody actually reacted until the news was spread
worldwide that Serbs killed 8,000 males in Srebrenica("Genocide and" 34). This is when the rest of the world, especially developed countries, saw
the need to help these innocent people in Bosnia.The United Nations tried to help the Bosniaks and Croats who were in severe need of a rescue
but only sent 400 soldiers. The city of Srebrenica had so much violence in it that it was too spread out for the UN soldiers to make an impact. This
resulted in these soldiers getting criticized around the world for their lack of contribution(36). This was not the case for the genocide of the Jews.
The Jews were at the height of media during the second World War. Hitler and his Nazi party made headlines week after week with the Holocaust.
Many of the countries in the Allied Powers were shocked to see that something so disastrous could actually happen.Mass killings were constantly made
at every camp. There is an estimated 250,000 Jewish people who died from these mass killings("The Holocaust"

Bosnia Genocide Essay
Zvornik and the later genocide around Srebrenica." Since the returnees were harassed, making the society multiethnic was very difficult. Also since the
local security took part in the attacks and genocide, it was hard to unify the country because they supported the ethnic cleansing. The returnees not
being able to return to their homes added to Bosnia being ethnically fractured after the war. As expressed by McMahon and Western, "In ethnically
fractured postwar Bosnia, however, such decentralization further weakened efforts to build a coherent state." The ethnic decentralization made it
difficult to unify Bosnia since the power was scattered. This split the government along with society, which kept the country fragmented. The isolation
of... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although many returnees ended up returning to their homes, the country was still broken due to many causes. As represented by Dahlman and
Tuathail, "The success of reaching one million returns is tempered by the reality that Bosnia is still a broken country, where obstructionism, political
corruption, and economic hardship compound the legacy of wartime displacements (Г“ Tuathail and Dahlman 2004b)." All of the problems that still
existed in Bosnia even after the war, like political corruption, caused the country to remain broken even though so many people were able to return
to their prewar homes. The country also remained broken after the war because the Bosnian Muslims were still left isolated and vulnerable. As
supported by McMahon and Western, "Second, exiting Bosnia will now leave Bosnian Muslims isolated and vulnerable, sending precisely the wrong
message to the Muslim world at a time when Brussels and Washington are trying to mend relationships frayed by the Iraq war and the 'global war on
terror.'" The country remained divided due to the isolation and vulnerability of the Bosnian Muslims after the war. This caused the failure of Bosnia to
become diverse, which kept the country

The Holocaust And The Bosnian Genocide
Two terrifying events in earth's history are the German Holocaust and the Bosnian genocide. Both are similar in the ways they horrified and
innocently killed their victims. They massacred based on which religion you believed in. We all know that the Jews were victims to the Nazis, but not
many know that Muslims were the unlucky recipient of the Bosnian genocide. Also, the techniques used to innocently kill the persecuted group are
parallel. How these genocides occurred is very alike; this includes each leader. During both crises, millions of innocent citizens were brutally killed
before the United States of America came to help and fight the oppressors. The German Holocaust is the most well known horrific massacring event in
the world. This occurred during World War II in Western Europe when anti
–Semitism, ethnic hatred, and nationalism prompted countries to join with
the Nazi administration in the destruction of European Jews. Over a few Axis states, fascist military associations terrorized, robbed, and killed
indigenous Jews, either under German direction or on their own. In these states and others, military personnel and the police played a main part in the
expropriation, concentration, and extradition of Jewish occupants in their nations ("Holocaust"). The "Holocaust Encyclopedia" best describes the
German Holocaust as: The Holocaust was the systematic, bureaucratic, state–sponsored persecution and murder of six million Jews by the Nazi regime
and its

The Bridge Betrayed And The Buddhas Of Bamiyan
The authors of The Bridge Betrayed and The Buddhas of Bamiyan both identify a different form of cultural eradication that occurred in within the past
twenty–five years. In Bosnia–Herzegovina, the Serbs and Croats wanted to destroy the Bosnian Muslim symbols, culture, and population. In
Afghanistan, the Taliban destroyed the Buddhas of Bamiyan, and in turn, changed the identity of Bamiyan forever. The practice of cultural eradication
is not limited to these two cases. Cultural eradication has taken place throughout history involving one group's desire to transform, absorb, and destroy
a particular culture and its' values. The desire for destruction may seem similar, however, the individual agendas that drive the eradication vary in each
instance. Michael Sells explores the nationalism that is expressed by the Serbs and Croats in Bosnia that he refers to as Christoslavism. Llewlyn Morgan
discusses the Taliban's iconoclastic and political motivations to destroy the Buddhas. Both examples ultimately analyze some of the many dimensions
of cultural eradication in the world.
From 1992 until 1995, the Serbs and Croats attempted to destroy the Bosnian Muslim culture. The Serb army shelled the National Library in Sarajvo,
which began the largest book–burning in modern human history, destroying books, records, and manuscripts. The Serb army targeted major
institutions that expressed the Bosnian Muslim culture and whatever places they looked over, the Croat Defense Council took care

Ethnic Conflict Of The Soviet Union
Ethnic Conflict
With a long stemming past of ethnic conflict within Yugoslavia, the country at long last disassembled over what historians would argue was "The
bloodiest war in Europe since World War II" (Multi–Ethnic Conflict: Yugoslavia.). Yugoslavia was a country composed of six republics
– The socialist
republic of Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia–Herzegovina, Serbia, and Slovenia. The country was created after world war one in 1929 and was
under the control of the Soviet Union up until 1991 when the Soviet Union broke apart. With the fall of the Soviet Union came the inevitable turmoil,
violence and destruction within Yugoslavia– the country began to fall apart. Ethnic conflict had been the root of war and violence through out
numerous countries all around the world for centuries. The ethnic conflict of Yugoslavia was caused by differences in religion and ethnicity, different
perspectives on government and politics, and disagreements over territory. Yugoslavia was just far too small for the different nationalities and
government structures within it. Yugoslavia has long suffered with problems concerning religion and ethnicity. There was always a back
– and– fourth
tension between the ethnic groups. "During the 1930s it became apparent that the ethnic groups were unwilling to blend and merge together. The Serbs
who made up about 40 percent of the population dominated politics. The Croats and Slovenes resented Serbian aggressiveness. These ethnic groups
lived an

Fall Of Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia fell in the 1990's into a mess of right–wing nationalistic states at war, resulted in numerous war crime, the bitter end was the result of the
fragmented political atmosphere in the wake of Tito's death. Significantly, though, the Soviet Union came to a relatively peaceful end due to
Gorbachev's leadership style, while the inability for different factions to compromise led to MiloЕЎeviД‡'s rise and the disturbing events of the 1990's.
Tito's government, while deservedly less notorious than Stalin's, was not able to achieve much economic success, and after his death the country's
centralized leadership began to fragment. Tito was replaced with a collective presidency, but this system began to fall apart due to economic troubles,
specifically... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While Tito's oppression may have made people more intrigued by its rise after his death, this fails to explain why things ended the way they did. When
Stalin died things changed in the USSR, but it didn't fall. And notably, Yugoslavia remained (de facto) unified until 1992, twelve years after Tito's
death. I'm convinced that things happened the way they did because nationalism appealed to the people; MiloЕЎeviД‡ sought to keep Yugoslavia
unified, but with Serbian supremacy, a promise which would have sounded good if you were a Serbian worried about the future of your people and
your nation, and used heinous means to try to achieve his goal. Perhaps if some sort of plan had been made prior to Tito's death that addressed the
problems that could arise, Yugoslavia may have lasted longer. Some people certainly hold onto memories of a time when Yugoslavia was at peace,
what Dubravka UgreЕЎiД‡ called "Yugonostalgia" in her novel The Ministry of Pain, indicating that there may have been the potential for Yugoslavia
to stay how it was had nationalism not been so appealing. In short, Yugoslavia may have been an old man no longer in his prime, but nationalism
murdered it, and Tito's death laid the gun on the

Norma Percy Death Of Yugoslavia Summary
Nationalism, Security, and the Death of Yugoslavia Norma Percy's "The Death of Yugoslavia" frames the political events that took place towards the
end of the Cold War that would ultimately result in the dissolvent of Yugoslavia. After the death of Josi Broz Tito, the once suppressed nationalism
between the Serbs and Croats was reignited under the control of Slobodan Milosevic. The Serbs claimed that their people were poorly treated at that
the Albanians yearned for an ethnically pure Yugoslavia. Unlike his predecessor, Milosevic catered to the Serbs, lending an ear to their nationalistic
tendencies instead of crushing it. As tensions mounted, Milosevic launched a Serbian crusade, taking over the sovereign republics of Vojvodina and
Montenegro. According to Percy (1995), the republic of Kosovo, full of Albanians, put up a fight but eventually bowed toSerbia through military force.
With regard to Slovenia and Croatia, the two republics managed to hold their ground against Milosevic and declared independence in 1991. While ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Similar to when Hitler took over Europe, the surrounding states of Yugoslavia put forth little military effort to assist the republics that were under
siege. What Percy (1995) fully fails to mention is that the Yugoslavian republics did not have the military capabilities to defend their own states;
regardless of it was against Milosevic or another outside force and was only amplified when outside states provided no military backup (Baylis,
Smith, & Owens, 2014). Thus, it was relatively easy for one party, with federal force and of one ethnicity, to come in and take over. Additionally,
without nationalism in the way, the Yugoslavian republics would have been able to come together and develop their military force on a state and federal

Community Analysis Essay
Imagination plays a crucial role in creating communities and its identity. Fiction, in this case will cover both absolute fabrications and biases in the
discourse of history's narration. History can be malleable in the hands of narrators, which they use to unite their audience into a common interpretation
of their history. Alicia Barber, The author of the essay, Local Places, National Spaces: Public Memory, Community Identity and Landscape at Scotts
Bluff National Monument, talks about two community's disagreement on a tourist spot's proper use and maintenance. Barber analyzes the community's
relations to the landmark and how it affects the discourse of history's narration, the malleability of public memory, and how it all connects with... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The community in this case refers to the local community's role in the history being commemorated. Their particular behaviour in staking their claim
in history can be described as a group's narcissism in their history's narration. A group's patriotism to a place would not exist if there was nothing to be
proud of, and sometimes, for such histories to exist, the narrative of the stories have to be bias. Their discourse lies within storyteller's allegiances and
favouritism to certain groups. The local community's (the neighbouring towns: Gering and Scottsbluff) role as an activist community who are the ones
who primarily interact with the landmark will be emphasizes. The national community's role in the landmark's development might be downsized or
simply not fall in favour of the narrator's discourse. Nationalism is a fiction that bends history. Conversions of fictions into history and history into
perceived fiction powers patriotism, and on the extreme end nationalism. Ignatieff states nationalism's propaganda on Serb radio about the Croats sets
the stone for the ignorance they need in order to separate themselves from the Croats, and to perceive their differences as threats to their
over–embraced uniqueness. "Nationalism is a fiction: it requires the willing suspension of disbelief. To believe in nationalist fictions is to forget certain
realities" (Ignatieff

Transitional Justice Interventions
Roy Gutman from the Newsday magazine brought this issues to light so the world could see how these individuals were being treated. On April 30,
1992 in Bosnia Serb forces decided to participate in ethnic cleansing by forcing many non–Serb people into this camp. They were living in brutal
conditions, the Omarska camp along Keraterm and Trnopolje were created and looked like a concentration camp. Transitional justice intervention deals
with historical human rights violations such as the violations that took place at the Omarska camp. The groups involved in ethnic cleansing were the
Muslims and Croats. By using transitional justice interventions this can heal wounds of those who have been affected by human rights violations, these
human rights violations have affected the victims or a country. These Muslims and Croats was being starved to death, tortured, killed and some women
were raped by the Serbs.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Transitional justice interventions will be the building of a memorial, will help to keep the memory of the survivors and the dead alive. There was a
mass grave that was found some felt this could justify for building a memorial. The Omarska camp memorial can be seen as a good and bad idea this
camp can cause the survivors to it may stir up old painful memories pain, trauma, physically and emotionally abuse. This memorial was going to build
to show some of the dangers that has happened regarding transitional justice interventions. Some of these harms involves the dislocation these victims
and violence they

Absence of Children's Wisdom in the Bosnian Conflict Essay
Absence of Children's Wisdom in the Bosnian Conflict
"There was never a time when, in my opinion, some way could not be found to prevent the drawing of the sword"(1). In the films, Pretty Village,
Pretty Flame, No Man's Land, and The Fourth Part of the Brain, the Bosnians were not particularly nationalistic or savage, rather; they were normal
people whose leaders led them into a violent struggle with their friends and neighbors, which was exacerbated by a lack of effective assistance from the
international community and the UN. These films depict the majority of combatants as either people who did not entirely support the war or people
who supported the war because they had been misinformed. Furthermore, the mindless atrocities, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Malcom 6). In addition, Croats and Serbs contained an ethnic Iranian component, which other Slavs lacked (Bosnia 7). During World War II, this
slight difference in ethnic composition may have lead to the Croatian Fascist movement, the Ustasha, which propagated racial propaganda similar to
that of the Nazis and considered Croats superior to other Slavs. At the beginning of the 1990s, there may have been some lingering resentment caused
by the Croat Ustasha movement existing in Yugoslavia; however, this mild undercurrent of resentment would not have been strong enough to cause the
senseless violence that transpired during the Bosnian Conflict.
In addition to minor ethnic differences, there were substantial religious differences amongst the various Bosnian ethnic groups: the Croats were
predominantly Catholic, the Serbs were predominantly Orthodox, and the largest ethnic group (an ethnic plurality) consisted of Bosnian Moslems.
This may have lead to the resentment of Moslems by Christians because converts to Islam received special privileges during the period of Ottoman
hegemony over the Balkans. Additionally, Catholics may have resented the Orthodox Christians because the Turks preferred the eastern Orthodoxy to
western Catholicism, which was the church of their rivals, the Habsburg Empire (Malcom 55). The Ottomans adopted a policy of taking Balkan
children, training and educating them and utilizing them in

The Bosnian Genocide
During the years of the Bosnian crisis, without the North Atlantic Treaty Organization working with the United Nations and executed humanitarian
relief by launching military intervention, sending peacekeeping forces and imposing sanctions respectively. Former Yugoslavia was made up of
Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia and Bosnia Herzegovina. During the collapse of Yugoslavia, many wars erupted through conflicting
interests between the six states. One of the many wars that occurred was the Bosnia War from April 6th, 1992 to December 14th, 1995. Muslims,Serbs
and Croats are the three main groups who populated Bosnia–Herzegovina. After Slovenia and Croatia declaring their independence, they began
claiming territory in Bosnia–Herzegovina. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States of America and NATO worked together which led to the creation of The General Framework for Peace inBosnia and Herzegovina
A.K.A. the Dayton Accords that began in November 1995. The Dayton Accords was signed on December 1995 that marked the ceasefire in Bosnia
Herzegovina. The Dayton Accords also marked a unified state that consisted of Muslim–Bosnians and Croats Federation gaining 51% of Bosnia
Herzegovina while Republika Srpska controlled the remaining 49%. Both groups have their own government and central government where it will be
carefully balanced. As Bosnia Herzegovina was split into nine zones, NATO approved the creation of the Implementation Force (IFOR). Their
objective is to mandate Bosnia–Herzegovina for a year. IFOR is a military force made up of NATO and non NATO nations. 60,000 soldiers were
deployed as a strong peace keeping force from thirty two nations to maintain peace between Bosnian Serbs and Bosnian Croats. Also, the troops
monitors the demilitarized and ceasefire zones. Operation Joint Endeavour was IFOR's mission to set up a secure domain for military and civilian
purposes including the build up of arms. Once military security was ensured, IFOR began Bosnia–Herzegovina's "transition to peace". The "transition
to peace" involved holding elections, arrest of war criminals,

Bosnia Genocide Research Paper
The Bosnian Genocide want not very good life to live. The country of Yugoslavia was formed in the year of 1929. The population of Bosnia is about
3.8 million people. Muslims represented the largest single population group by 1931. They were described as fundamentalists by the Serbs. The
social federal republic of Yugoslavia was led by the Dictator Gossip Brazito.Three of the major groups in Yugoslavia were theSerbs, Croats, and the
Slovenes. The Croatians were under the French and Austro Hungarian control and were predominantly Catholic. They made up about 12% of the
population. The slovenians were under the control of Austro– Hungarian and were also Catholic. The Serbs were under Ottoman control and were of
the Eastern Orthodox religion. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many different ethnic and religious groups resided together for at least 40 years under Yugoslavia's repressive communist government. During the
World War II Yugoslavia was invaded by the Nazi Germany. The Serb who was opposing the breakup of Yugoslavia started a war against the
Slovenians. In the year of 1945, Yugoslavia began to economically develop differently than its socialist counterparts by creating a unique form of
decentralized market socialism based on workers that are self– management. The first goal of the Serb was to completely wipe out he educated wealthy
and any other type of non – serbs who actively opposed their rule. Tito was a strong leader who maintained ties with the Soviet Union and the United
States during the Cold War. Tit did manage to keep ethnic friction at a minimum for a long period of time. Then Tito died in 1980. By the late 1920's
a new leader a Serbian named Slobodan

Bosnia V. Holocaust Essay
Genocide is the systematic and planned extermination of an entire national, racial, political, or ethnic group. In Germany during World War II a
man named Hitler tried to eliminate any race except for what he called the "Arian" race. In the process he committed genocide by
killing off 6 million Jews and a total of 8 million people in all. Europe was going through some very hard times during the mid 1900's so that no one
was able to see a disaster such as the Holocaust coming. Many things led to the weakening of Europe at the time. The Ottoman Empire was breaking
up plus they were still trying to get over the devastation of WW I. Bosnia and Herzegovina had been having many problems as well. They were a
witness to much change and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Serbs then dominated Yugoslaviaso they then decided to try and expand by setting up Serbian regions in Bosnia. The Bosnian government did not
allow that, thus leading to armed conflicts between the Serbs and the non–Serbs. Another major difference was the fact that Hitler started the mass
murder within his own country and expanded outward through Imperialism, Bosnia however did not. When the Serbs got control of Yugoslavia they
became more of a nation banded together than the Croats and the Slovenes were, so what started off as a war became blown up into a mass–murdering
spree.
In Bosnia the people who were doing the killing was not one person, it was the whole nation of Serbs. Meanwhile in Germany the people
committing murder were all looking up to one person. They followed Hitler's ideas and not their own. Hitler was able to manipulate the minds of
the community and make them believe that what he was doing was good and was only for the good of the nation. In Bosnia the people knew that
they what they were doing was murder and bad and that they were killing off the people just to gain power but that didn't stop them, their goal was to
be the leading ethnic race. In Bosnia it wasn't until the early 1990's that the Croats and Muslims decided to fight together against the Serbs. All the
years of war before that took place with all three groups at odds with each other, and the Serbs trying to kill them all off with

Essay on The Yugoslavian Conflict
The Yugoslavian Conflict
Yugoslavia is a country burdened by feuding sides in a war that cannot soon be resolved. The United Nations are attempting to help the situation, but
until the people of Yugoslavia can come to an agreement continued warfare and heartache is inevitable.
The problems in Yugoslaviabegan because the country is separated into two distinct parts. The north and west parts of the country were once under the
rule of the Austro–Hungarian Empire, and the south and the east were controlled by the Ottoman Empire. This had extreme effects on the ethnic,
cultural and economic differences between the two sides. The three major religions in Yugoslavia were Greek Orthodox, Christianity, Roman
Catholicism,
and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The taking over of the borders by Slovenian militia was deemed sufficient grounds to call out the Yugoslavian National Army. This order was given
from the ministry of defense, who had no authority to do so.
Yugoslavia was without a president at the time and control of the country was given to the supreme commander of the armed forces. The whole affair
was organized as military support to the federal police and customs personnel. The
Slovenians offered strong resistance with their territorial defense units, politically organized the withdrawal of their representatives from the
presidency and the Executive Council of Yugoslavia, and directed a massive propaganda campaign presenting themselves as victims of brutal
Yugoslavian
National Army aggression.
Croatia also attempted to claim independence, but they had a problem that the Slovenians didn't have to deal with. They had a large population of
Serbians in Croatia and with the new laws that the Croatian government tried to impose the minority Serbians were given no rights as a minority and
were forced to go by the new found Croatian law. This caused conflicts inside Croatia between the Serbian rebels and the Croatian National Guard
who tried to keep order. Many of these conflicts left many people dead and wounded. The
Yugoslavian National Army (JNA) openly sided with the

Genocide during the Bosnian War
Raphael Lemkin described genocide as "acts of barbarism that should be outlawed, even in times of war". Lemkin is right. Genocide is a cruel
vicious act that I do not wish upon my greatest enemies. It is torture and death. A lot of people think genocide is a thing of the past. After all it is
2014 already. We are so much more advanced and connected then back during the time of the Holocaust. A genocide started just 22 years ago and it
was during the Bosnian War. The Bosnian Genocide was atrocious because it classified and dehumanized a religion, it allowed for the extermination
of a people based on religion and the murderers denied they ever committed a crime and tried to cover the deaths up. The Bosnian War took place in
the republic of... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Serbs who stayed friendly with Muslim neighbors or tried to protect them were considered traitors, and they were dealt with harshly (Ching). The
prisoners in the camps were beaten, denied food and water, housed in horrific conditions, sexually assaulted, tortured, and finally killed (Bosnian
Genocide). " There was no food, little water, and a lot of fear"(Bosnia 1995). Some detainees there were killed on a pyre of burning tires, while
others were forced to load dead bodies onto trucks, or to dig their own graves. As many as fifty thousand Muslim girls and women, aged nine to sixty,
were raped by Serbian soldiers and volunteers. This made them unfit, according to Muslim culture, to be either wives or mothers (Ching). The Serbian
soldiers would declare after rape that the women had given birth to Serbian babies. Due to these incidents, many of the female captives lost all of their
strength and suffered from a number of sexually transmitted infections. The first goal of the Serbs was to wipe out the educated, the intellectuals, the
wealthy, and any other non–Serbs who actively opposed their rule. By June 1994, fewer than 50,000 remained in their home and the area had been
determined "purified". (The Combat). Most Bosnian Croats and Serbs had the option of fleeing to Croatia and Serbia. However Bosnian Muslims had
nowhere to go. They crowded into Bosnian cities that were still widely thought to be safe. Serbian forces continued to carry out

The Tragic Tragedy Of Yugoslavia
The Tragedy in Yugoslavia Imagine being in the middle of a bloody, tragic war; your relatives are dying and your city being completely destroyed
and reduced to rubble. This is what it was like for the citizens living in Yugoslavia from 1992 to 1995 during the atrocious Yugoslav Genocide
(Bosnian Genocide). During this war for independence, over two hundred thousand people died and around two million people fled from the region
(Civil War). The Republic of Bosnia–Herzegovina was the main place of battle after they declared independence in 1992 (Blackburn). Sarajevo, the
capital of Bosnia–Herzegovina was where the worst fighting took place. The Yugoslav Genocide was mainly caused by the political unease that had
been rising in Yugoslavia. Although these political strains were the primary cause for the mass genocide, they were not the only factor. Long standing
rivalries between three religions and an economic crisis that had been growing in Yugoslavia also played prominent roles in inducing the war. Over
time, numerous political tensions between the Serbians, Croatians and Muslims generated violence, which negatively provoked different ethnic groups
and eventually led to a war. These three groups made up the majority of the Yugoslavian population. They had long standing rivalries and tensions the
had been steadily increasing over time. After World War I, the three ethnic groups were forced together in the Kingdom of Serbs, Muslims, and Croats.
The new kingdom was renamed the

Genocide In Bosnia Research Paper
Genocide In Bosnia The Genocide in Bosnia was the outcome of misleadership and late intervention by the world. The Bosnian conflict was a war
that led to the death of over 100,000 soldiers and civilians(War Crime). The war consisted consisted of two sides: the Bosnian–Serbs and the
Bosnian–Croats. The conflict was handled improperly. It even came close to home as one american soldier was stranded in Bosnia in the middle of the
war witnessing all that the UN and the government of the Bosnian–Serbs would pronounce to be false. "Genocide means any of the following acts
committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group(US Holocaust Museum)".The Bosnian war is a pure
example of Genocide. In 1995 the Bosnian–Serbs massacred the town of Srebrenica. Eight–thousand Muslim Men and boys died while the women
were raped and then slaughtered(War crime). Civilian killings were directed toward Muslims and in 1971 the Muslim ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
History.com says these countries were forged as one after WW2. But power and leadership was an issue; and in the mid 1980's Serbian leader
Slobodan Milosevic began creating differences between the countries. Then In 1991 Slovenia, Croatia, and Macedonia all declared Independence.
Then in 1992 Bosnia declared Independence. War broke out in Croatia and Bosnia. The sides were the Bosnian–Croats against the Bosnian–Serbs.
With the backing of Serbian leader Milosevic and the Yugoslavian army, the general of the Bosnian
–Serbs Ratko Mladic overwhelmed the
Bosnian–Croats at Sarajevo(capital of Bosnia)and gained control. Throughout 1992 the Bosnian Serbs would conquer three quarters of Bosnia. Within
the land they conquered, Srebrenica suffered the

Conflict Between Narcissism And Aggression Essay
Correspondingly, the propaganda of both Croats and Serbs indulged their populations to believe that each side was responsible for their suffering.
Further there is a psychological dimension of the ethnic nationalism that is centered around peoples' perceptions when questioning their identity.
Conflict is a process driven by collective needs and fears that comes from a psychological aspect. Psychology drives attitudes and behaviours of
individuals and groups. Using Freud's analysis, Ignatieff focuses our attention on the relationship between narcissism and aggression. Narcissism is a
personality trait that involves arrogant behavior, a lack of empathy for other people, and a need for self–admiration.
Ignatieff exploration of Freud's analysis conduces him to the assumption that nationalism and narcissism are two allied expressions. He says:
A nationalist takes the neutral facts about people–their language, habit, culture, tradition, and history–and turns these facts into a narrative, whose
purpose is to illuminate the self–consciousness of a group, to enable them to think of themselves as a nation with a claim to self–determination. A
nationalist, in other words, takes "minor differences"–indifferent in themselves–and transforms them into major differences (45).
This passage shows that nationalism is a sort of narcissism. Yugoslavs nationalists wanted a nation where all walks of people in Yugoslavia could live
together as one single group. They neglected minor differences

Gendercide In The Bosnia-Herzegovina Genocide
Genocide has been around for ages, and usually occurs during a military conflict. When people think of genocide, they think of the annihilation of a
race, religion, or class including all members of the group. Killing all the people in a family was considered the root and branch method. This was
used to assure that no other generations could come in the future. This is not the case for all genocides. In the Bosnia–Herzegovina genocide,
battle–aged men were murdered while the women were taken as sex slaves. This is still considered genocide because the Serbs, killing all males who
were Muslim or Croats, would make it impossible for them to continue to reproduce and continue their ethnic group. Also, enslaving all women as sex
slaves is still ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gendercide is the targeting of one gender in genocide, and in this case it is directed towards the males. Rape is a weapon used in history, and by
the Serbs, to humiliate and destroy the lives of women and their culture. The Serbs used it to make the women never want to come back to their
homeland. Killing the men and enslaving the women is to prevent the next generation of Muslims and Croats. The killing had started due to the
breaking up of Yugoslavia, which was filled with mixing ethnic groups, and religions in many of their cities. "They would kill the male children to
make sure they could not plot revenge, or to reproduce" (Jones 465). The males were targeted for killings because they were seen as a military threat,
unlike the women. The Serb's goal was the ethnic cleansing of Bosnia–Herzegovina, and the incorporate it into greater Serbia. Their strategy was to
terrorize the non–Serb population into fleeing, to murder Muslim and Croat men, and then to deport the remaining population. The killings and the
rapes were done by Serbian men. Some willing and others unwilling. Some Serbs were approached by soldiers and told they must participate and help
with the cleansing. "Men working at the rape camps would sometimes

The Split of Yougoslavia
DISCUSS the reasons of the split of Yugoslavia and its consequences on its people and society.
After the Second World War, the great nation of Yugoslavia was formed by countries considered similar but extremely diverse in contexts of religion,
culture and ideals. The break up of this nation resulted from the weaknesses in government after the death of their leader and national tensions which
had been present for centuries. From this, the Yugoslav war had been triggered impacting the peace amongst the nations which once resided together
and causing destruction, which had, and still does, cause problems for and amongst the nations and people involved.
Yugoslaviawas a nation in the Balkan region of Europe formed, under a monarchy of King Peter I after the First World War, named the KingdomSerbs,
Croats and Slovenes. This nation holds historic significance due to it being the first union since the Ottoman and Austro Hungarian Empires
conquering the region. Yugoslavia first gained international recognition on 13th July 1922 by the Conference of Ambassadors in Paris and was later
renamed the "kingdom of Yugoslavia on the 3rd of October 1925.
After the Invasion of the Nazi regime on April 6th 1941, Yugoslavia was under the control of Fascism and abolished monarchy in 1945. It was then
later freed from Nazi rule by Communist leader, Marshal Josip Broz Tito and the Partisan Army and renamed the Federal People's Republic of
Yugoslavia (later renamed the Socialist Federal

Peace in Yugoslavia From 1919 Until 1980 Essay
Peace in Yugoslavia From 1919 Until 1980
Peace in Yugoslavia meant unity. The country was a drawing together of different groups, which held together from 1919 to the 1980. Before the
First World War the Austria ruled the individual countries of Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia as well as other countries such as Hungary as part of the
Hapsburg Empire. The other big empire was the Turkish Ottoman Empire. All the individual areas had different ethnic groups and religions. The
Croats were Roman Catholic, people living in Bosnia were mainly Muslim, as were people living in Kosovo. Serbia was a separate independent country,
ruled by its own King. The Serb religion was Christian Orthodox.
The Treaty ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
King Peter ruled until his death in 1921, when his son, who became King Alexander I, replaced him. King Alexander had a Government dominated by
Serbs, which made all of the decisions. He refused to listen to wishes of Slovenes and Croats and would not give them any say in decisions
concerning their regions. In 1929, Alexander changed the country's name from the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and the Slovenes and dismissed
parliament so he could run the country as a dictatorship. He used his Serb dominated Secret Police to deal with protests in Croatia and Slovenia.
Members of other ethnic groups were angered by the Kings dictatorship (especially the Croats who wanted more control over their regions). A Croat
resistance movement (formed as a result of the removal of parliament) murdered Alexander during a visit to France in on 9th October 1934. He had,
however, been a strong King, with definite ideas about how he had wanted to run the country. His dictatorship– unpopular as it had been with some
groups, did help hold Yugoslaviatogether.
Following King Alexander's assassination, his brother Prince Paul ruled the country, on behalf of his nephew, who was too young

Genocide And The Holocaust
Genocide is one of the most tragic events that can happen around the world. Identifying the stages is the most crucial part of stopping these horrible
acts. The Bosnian Genocide and the Holocaust could have been prevented or stopped if the 8 stages were properly identified . There are 8 stages of
genocide and the first stage is Classification. Classification is putting people into groups based on race, ethnicity, and religion. These groups usually
are separated into the superior people and the inferior people. In the holocaust the Nazis targeted minorities, more specifically the Jewish people. The
Jews were seen as the inferior race and they needed to be eliminated according to the nazis. The second stage of genocide is symbolization.... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This stage of genocide is called polarization. Polarization is where they separate the population. The SS and Nazis used propaganda to convince the
german population the the Jewish people were the root of all evil. They used posters and videos to make this happen. Poster depicted Jews as being
ape–like with large noses and a slanted forehead. The most prevalent example of this is the Hitler Youth, they were brainwashed using propaganda so
they would believe that everything Hitler said was morally right. The people that rebelled and did not believe the propaganda were eliminated. The
next stage of genocide and the first step of the systematic killing is preparation. Preparation is when the target group is put together and combined to
make it easier for extermination. In the Bosnian Genocide men and women were moved to concentration camps where they would be held until they
were killed. The Serbs overthrew the law enforcement and roamed the streets rounding up Bosniaks, making sure none got away. They executed anyone
that was thought to be strong enough to rebel instantly. The most gruesome stage of Genocide is Extermination. Extermination is the killing of the
targeted group. They use the word extermination because they do not view the victims as humans and they are making them feel like rats or insects by
using this term. In the Holocaust they had many ways of killing the Jews, the SS and Nazis used, starvation, exhaustion, mobile shooting squads, and
gas

Ethnic Nationalism Source Of Community Of Fear Essay
Ethnic Nationalism Source of Community of Fear
Nationalism, according to the most widely accepted definitions of, is the doctrine that the state and the nation should be congruent. However, there is
much more to add to the definition of nationalism today in connection to the ethnic and civil society. The definition of nationalism depends on its
context. The typology of nationalism defines its strength and/or weakness of the relationship among the community in which it's defined. While civil
nationalism accepts people for who they are in the unique condition that they accept the country's constitution, ethnic nationalism goes beyond and
requires that the community should share a common culture which can be raced, ethnic group, language or religion. There are many explanations in
resonating for why ethnic nationalism is an exclusive "National project" (according to Igatieff). Despite the urgency of this issue, Scholars have until
recently not addressed the question of accommodation of communities regarding ethnic nationalism. This argument will contribute to this discussion,
by looking at the link between conflicts and ethnic nationalism. The points presented in this argumentation will highlight the weaknesses of ethnic
nationalism in modern states. The argument will articulate these weaknesses by first looking at the genealogical roots and the modernist origin of
ethnic nationalism. Then it will sketch the relationship between mass media, narcissism, intolerance and the

Bosnian Genocide Research Paper
The Bosnian Genocide began in April of 1992 and ended in 1995. It was a war between the Bosnian Muslims, the Croats, which are Catholics, and the
Serbs, which are Orthodox Christians. It occurred in Bosnia–Herzegovina where the population was about 3.8 million. The Bosniaks made up 44
percent of the population, the Serbs 31 percent, and the Croats 17 percent. The country is only about the size of West Virginia. The Bosniaks were
treated unfairly and inhumanely during this span of three years. It all began with a new president, Slobodan Milosevic (a Serbian who turned to
nationalism and religious hatred to gain his power) being elected. He ignited long–standing tensions between the Serbs and the Muslims. When
Slovenia and Croatia both declared

Bosnian Genocide Essay
In 1992 when Bosnia declared its independence from the Yugoslav, Orthodox–Christian Serbians were losing power to the Muslim Bosniaks. The
Bosnian–Serb forces did not want to be outnumbered by Bosniaks at all. Especially when it came to things like politics. The Serbs that lived in
Bosnia & Herzegovina felt threatened by the numerous amount of Muslim power, so they decided to exterminate them. This resulted in a genocide. A
genocide is the deliberate killing of a large group of people. This genocide is known as the Bosnia and Herzegovina Genocide.
The Bosnian and Herzegovinian Genocide took place in Bosnia and Herzegovina, (Bosnia), and Serbia. Before Bosnia became independent, they started
to elect their first president. At the time there ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They organized their genocide by state, (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Their goal was to exterminate all Bosniaks, (Muslim people who lived in Bosnia),
and Croats, (Croatians who lived in Bosnia). That made the Bosniaks and Croats the victim. They were being targeted because ever since Bosnia
broke away from Yugoslavia, Serbians had less power.
Bosnia breaking away from Yugoslavia is the catalyst for this genocide. When they broke away, theSerbs living in Bosnia didn't have the population
power, political power, or religious power. They figured that if they just took out all of the Bosniaks, (who had the majority power at the time), then
they would be better off. So, that's what they did. They began their extermination process in early May of 1992 by attacking a Bosniak–dominated town.
Unfortunately, this was only the beginning of it. The Serbians quickly started to gain speed in their extermination process. The whole process of
wiping out all Bosniaks and Croats was expected to take about five years. But, in 1994 NATO forces initiated air strikes against the Bosnian–Serbs to
stop the murders/ attacks. In December of 1955 the conflict was ended and there was a force created to maintain ceasefire. Over the course of those
three years Bosniaks and Croats were tortured, killed, and starved by the

Bringa Film We Are All Neighbours
Although it is true that , words as Chetniks while referring to Serbs and certain unease from the Muslim in the village, expressed by Nusreta a
Muslim, towards the Serbs can be detected in the movie it is hardly the main focus and reason for violence. Historical grievances and animosities are
not mentioned. In my last point, I would like to focus on what Bringa and Sudetic overlooked or did not emphasized enough while attempting to
explain what account for violence in local communities in Bosnia, as well as, what I personally found to be the most persuasive and insightful in their
explanation. Starting with Bringa film "We Are All Neighbours"I find that although image speaks a thousand words there still many unknowns in the
movie,

Bosnian War Research Paper
The Bosnian War
By Parley P Johnson
APA format
Bosnia Herzegovina
Bosnia is located in what was once the country of Yugoslavia. The landscape is very scenic and majestic; the national parks and country side is a
beautiful. Bosnia was a melting pot of ideologies both political and religious. The location and political role played a key in its direction. The political
situation is also unique; it has a very close three way split between Serbs, Croats and Muslims. The population was 44% Muslim, 31%, the third largest
was the Croats, and lastly at 8 % was all others. The Serbs are Orthodox Christians and support Serbia Bosnia's neighbor to the east The Croats were
Catholic and Bosnia neighbor to the north. The Capital Sarajevo ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The rise of nationalist groups, in the void of a strong central government, the nationalists were able to gain ground and push for their own agenda.
The massacre at Srebrenica was one of the worst crimes in the Bosnia War. According to a New York Times article, After the Srebrenica and Markale
massacres, which proved key in ending the war? The world had had enough, the Balkans conflict, Bosnia War, the breakup of Yugoslavia. NATO and
the US would come to end the conflict.
The outcry of the world was loud and clear. The hind sight is clear that the world acted to slow to prevent the ethnic cleansing that took place. The
difficulty lay in how to accomplish the mission with so many players, each having its own agenda. The United Nations and The United States granted
recognition to Bosnia in April 1992; this however was not enough to stop the coming

Bosnian Rwandan Genocide Comparison Essay
Discuss and Analyze the similarities and differences between the genocide committed in Rwanda and Yugoslavia in the 1990s. The Rwandan and
Bosnian Genocides were more similar than different due to the fact that both were supported by the governing force at the time, and both were ignited
due to past tensions between two separate ethnicities. The Rwandan and Bosnian Genocides were similar in the fact that both were supported by the
ruling force at the time. The Rwandan Genocide, was organized by the newly created Hutu government, while the Bosnian Genocide, was executed by
the Bosnian Serb Army with support from the Yugoslav Army. In Rwanda, the government was formerly controlled by the minor (10%) Tutsi. The
Tutsi were given this... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In both genocides, the ruling force of the country supported or organized the genocide of its country. The Hutu government massacred the Tutsi, and
the Serbians massacred the Bosnian Muslims. Another similarity between the two genocides was that both were started due to past hatreds between the
two conflicting factions. The Rwandan Genocide was ignited due to hatred of Tutsi by the Hutu when the former were still in power. The Bosnian
Genocide due to long–lasting hatred between the Serbs and Croats. When Rwanda was first colonized Tutsi were considered to be above the Hutu,
but the balance of power was shifted between the two groups when Belgium abandoned the state due to revolution. When the Tutsi were in power,
the Hutu were always treated inferior to the Tutsi. The hatred of the Tutsi by the Hutu lasted long enough that the Hutu took revenge on the Tutsi in
the form of genocide. In the Bosnian Genocide the animosity and the hatred began even earlier. It began in the Croatian War from 1991 to 1995.
Serbian would occupy 30% of Croatian land. However the Croats in the displaced territory were abused by the Serbs, and when Croatia received full
independence in 1992, the Croatians took revenge on the Serbs. In the same year, the Bosnian War began between the Serbs and Croats over the newly
declared independent Republic of Bosnia–Herzegovina. In an act of revenge for the loss of the Croatian War and the aftermath from it, the Serbs took
revenge in the form of

The Yugoslavian Conflict Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jennifer Moore

More from Jennifer Moore (18)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Yugoslavian Conflict Essay