IRJET Secure Multimedia Content Protection and Sharing

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 02 | Feb -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1703
Secure Multimedia Content Protection and Sharing
Anitha. V1, Priyanka .R2 , Subburam.S3 ,Kapila Vani R.K4
1,2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Prince Shri Venkateshwara Padmavathy Engineering
College, Chennai, India
3 Professor,Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Prince Shri Venkateshwara Padmavathy
Engineering College, Chennai, India
4Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Prince Dr. K. Vasudevan College of
Engineering and Technology, Chennai, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract— Deliberate or inadvertent spillage of classified
information is without a doubt a standout amongst the most
serious security dangers that associations confront in the
computerized period. The danger now reaches out to our own
lives: a plenty of individual data is accessible to informal
communities and cell phone suppliers and is in a roundabout
way exchanged to deceitful outsider and fourth meeting
relevance. In this occupation, we show a non-detailed in
sequence extraction system LIME for information streamover
different elements that take two trademark, vital parts (i.e.,
proprietor and buyer). We characterize the correct security
ensures required by such an information ancestry instrument
toward distinguishing proof of a liable substance, and
recognize the improving non-renouncement and genuineness
suspicions. We then create and dissect a novel responsible
informationexchangeconventionbetweentwoelementsinside
a vindictive domain by expanding upon unaware exchange,
vigorous watermarking, and signatureprimitives. Atlonglast,
we play out a test assessment to exhibit the common sense of
our convention what's more, apply our structuretothecritical
information spillagesituationsofinformationoutsourcing and
interpersonal organizations. By and large, we consider LIME,
our heredity structure for information exchange, to be a key
stride towards accomplishing responsibility by plan.
Key Words: Cloud storage,public audit,Data integrity,Third
Party Auditor (TPA) Data privacy preserving.
1. INTRODUCTION
In the advanced time, data spillage through inadvertent
exposures, on the other hand deliberate damage by
displeased workers and pernicious outer elements, show a
standout amongst the most genuine dangers to associations.
As indicated by afascinatingorderofinformationbreakskept
up by the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (PRC), in the United
States alone, 868, 045, 823 records have been broken from4,
355 information ruptures made open since 2005. It is not
hard to trust this is quite recently the tip of the icy mass, as
most instances of data spillage go unreported because of
dread of loss of client certainty or administrative
punishments: it costs organizations by and large $214 per
bargained record. Substantial measures of computerized
information can be replicated at no cost and can be spread
through the web in brief time. Furthermore, the danger of
getting got for information spillage is low, as there are at
present no responsibility components. Forthesereasons,the
issue of information spillage has achieved another
measurement these days.
Not just organizationsare influencedbyinformationspillage;
it is additionally a worry to people. The ascent of
interpersonal organizationsand cell phoneshasexacerbated
things. In these situations, people reveal their own data to
different administration suppliers, ordinarily known as
outsiderapplications,consequentlyforsomeconceivablyfree
administrations. Without legitimate controls furthermore,
responsibility components, a large portion of these
applications impart people's distinguishing data to many
promoting furthermore, Internet following organizations.
Indeed, even with get to control instruments, where
access to delicate information is restricted, a pernicious
approved client can distribute touchy information when he
gets it. Primitives like encryption offer insurance just the
length of the data of intrigue is encoded, yet once the
beneficiary unscrambles a message, nothing can keep him
from distributing the decoded content. In this way it appears
difficult to counteract information spillage proactively. Be
that as it may, as found in the taking after situations the
adequacy of arrangements is sketchy as long as it is
impractical to provably relate theblameworthygatheringsto
the spillages.
We find that the above and other information spillage
situations can be relatedtoa nonattendanceofresponsibility
systems amid information exchanges: leakers either don't
concentrate on insurance, or they deliberately uncover
secret information with noworry,astheyarepersuadedthat
the spilled information can't be connected to them. In
different words, when substances realize that they can be
considered responsible for spillage of some data, they will
exhibit a superior responsibility towards its required
insurance. Now and again, distinguishing proof of the leaker
is made conceivable by scientific strategies, yet these are
typically costly and don't continuously create the craved
outcomes. Consequently, we bring up the requirement for a
general responsibility systemininformation exchanges.This
responsibility can be straightforwardly connected with
provably identifying a transmission history of information
over various elements beginning from its birthplace. This is
known as information provenance, information heredity or
source following. The information provenance technique,as
vigorous watermarking strategies or including fake
information, has as of nowbeenrecommendedinthewriting
and utilized by a few enterprises. Be that as it may, most

endeavors have been speciallyappointedinnatureandthere
is no formal model accessible. Furthermore, the majority of
these methodologies just permit recognizable proof of the
leaker in a non-provable way, which is not adequate as a
rule.
2. EXISTING SYSTEM
In existing framework, recognizable proof of the leaker is
made conceivable by measurablesystems,howevertheseare
normally costly and don't generally create the wanted
outcomes. Hence, we bring up the requirement for a general
responsibility component in information exchanges. This
responsibility can be straightforwardly connected with
provablydistinguishingatransmissionhistoryofinformation
over various substances beginning from its root. This is
known as information provenance, information ancestry or
source following. The information provenance strategy is
utilizing strong technique including fake information in
inserted message, so that permit of distinguishing proof of
leaker is insufficient to discover leaker.
Disadvantages of Existing System:
1. In interpersonal organizations break of touchy
private data about the clients and their companions
is conceivable even after approach requirement.
2. Data with get to control instrument, where access
to delicate information is restricted, a malevolent
approved outsider can distribute touchy
information after he/she gets information.
3. Repeated mass outsourcing of touchy data with set
of rules implemented can be perniciously
genealogy for money related advantages.
4. A legal system is too expensive for distinguishing
methods.
3. OUR CONTRIBUTIONS
In this venture we characterize LIME technique (Lineage in
Malicious Environment)topersonalitytheliableparty.Inthis
strategy wedole out an obviously characterize administer to
each included gathering and force the between connections
between these parts. Three distinct parts are information
supplier, information buyer (outsider), and examiner. The
information supplier part is to keep up the archives
(images).The information purchaser (outsider) gets the
record and furthermore forward the report to another
outsider.
Reviewer is conjured when aspillageishappens,heisjust
mindful to discover a spillage (blameworthygathering).Heis
summoned by a proprietor and gave the spilled information.
The spilled information was assessed by examiner utilizing
LIME and in this technique, there is distinguishing data
implanted for every customer who got the information.
Undetectable watermarking is done utilizing stenography in
each outsourced picture. Utilizing this data the evaluatorcan
make a genealogy, by cross checking and he discovers the
leaker.
The proposed model of this project isas showninthefigure1
which consists of four main phases as follows,
 Data Upload and Outsource Request.
 Accepting Request and watermarking Method.
 Access Control and Forwarding Data.
 Data Lineage method.
Data Upload and Outsource Request
In this module every association needs to enlist and
transfer a few records like picture,isinchargeofdealingwith
the archives. The customer (outsider) picks the supplier and
gets the supplier's picture list. Purchasers pick the pictures
which one he needs and give the demand to particular
supplier.
4. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
Accepting Request and watermarking Method
Wheninformationsupplierloginwithhisqualificationshe
can see thedemandnoticesandcanacknowledgethedemand
or leave as it seems to be. In the wake of tolerating the
demand, then the archives to be send is watermarked. Here
strong watermarking technique is utilized which utilizes
stenographicstrategytoinstallthedata.Theimplanteddata's
are purchasername,suppliernameandfilename.Thesethree
data's are changed to mark utilizing HMAC calculation. The
entire data is scrambled utilizing RSA calculation .The
encoded data is inserted intothepicture.Masswatermarking
is done which is prepared for outsourcing.

Access Control and Forwarding Data
Get to Control Mechanism is to limit the buyer to forward the
records that is how frequently the archivescanbeexchanged
to another purchaser (outsider). So client can't forward the
records to numerous outsiders.Afterlimitation,thepictureis
forward to that asked for purchaser. Customer login with his
certifications he/she can see the picture.
Data lineage Method
Get to Control Mechanism is to limit the buyer to forward
the records that is how frequently the archives can be
exchanged to another purchaser (outsider). So client can't
forward the records to numerous outsiders. After limitation,
the picture is forward to that asked for purchaser. Customer
login with his certifications he/she can see the picture.
The reviewer at first takes the proprietor as the flow
presume sends the spilledarchivetotheebbandflowsuspect
and requests that he give thedecodingkeytothewatermarks
in this record. Utilizing the key, reviewer can decode the
report .Thebuyer name is enlisted clientthenthecustomeris
trusted. In the event that client is not enlisted client, the
implanted data length will fluctuate, then evaluator adds the
genealogy in shopper .After cross check between the
presumes a definitive leaker of the picture is recognized.
5. RELATED WORKS
1. Shafi Goldwasser, Silvio Micali And Ronald L. Rivest in
1988. Present a digital signature scheme based on the
computational difficulty of integer factorization. The scheme
possesses the work of fiction property of being healthy
alongside an adaptive chosen-message attack: an adversary
who receives signatures for messages of his choice (where
each message may be chosen in a way that depends on the
autograph of beforehand preferred communication) cannot
afterward create the autograph of even a single additional
message. This may be somewhat surprising, since in the
folklore the possessions ofencompassfalsificationindividual
corresponding to factoring and organism unassailable to an
adaptive chosen-message attack were considered to be
contradictory. More generally, we show how to assemble a
mark system with such belongings bottom on the
continuation of a "claw-free" pair of permutations--a
potentially weaker assumption than the intractability of
numeral factorization. The new method is potentially
practical:signingandverifyingsignaturesarereasonablyfast,
and signatures are compact.
2. Zhiyong Zhang in 2011, Progressive and dynamic
developments in the digital content industry are significantly
dependent on copyright protection. Successful use control
advances can ensure that end purchasers can lawfully get to,
exchange, and share copyrighted substance and relating
computerized rights. From thespecializedandadministrative
points of view, we give a wide review on cutting edge of
Digital Rights Management (DRM) frameworks. This paper
begins with a non specific DRM biological system that
adequately underpins two run of the mill application
situations, and the environment assembles multi-partner
trust and amplifies chance administration openings. And
furthermore, an all encompassing and far reaching
examination of use control models, approaches, and
component were made in detail. These incorporate, yet are
not constrained to, different correlations of rights expression
dialects, security models, approval administration, rights
exchange, and dependable use of secure end-client
computerized gadgets or purchaser hardware.Atlast,ascope
of open issues and difficulties for DRM biological systems are
highlighted. An assortment of controllable and traceable
rights sharing among e-clients, in blend with security hazard
administration, will be the key for rising informal
organization administrations.
3. Emil Praun Hugues Hoppey Adam Finkelstein Princeton,
We describe a robust method for watermarking triangle
meshes. Watermarking gives a component to copyright
assurance of computerized media by implanting data
distinguishing the proprietor in the information. The greater
part of the examination on advanced watermarks has
concentrated on media, for example, pictures, video, sound,
and content. Powerful watermarks must have the capacity to
survive an assortment of "assaults", including resizing,
trimming, and separating. For strength to such assaults, late
watermarking plans utilize a"spread-range" approach– they
change the archive to the recurrence area and annoy the
coefficients of the perceptually most huge premisecapacities.
We extend this spread-range way to deal with work for the
hearty watermarking of discretionary triangle networks.
Summing up spread range methods to surfaces presents two
noteworthy difficulties. To start with, self-assertive surfaces
do not have a characteristic parametrization for recurrence
based decay. Our answer is to build an arrangement of scalar
premise work over theworkverticesutilizingmultiresolution
investigation. The watermark irritates vertices along the
heading of the surface ordinary, weighted by the premise
capacities. The second test is that rearrangements and
different assaults may adjust the network of the work. We
utilize a streamlining procedure to resample an assaulted
work utilizing the first work availability. Comes about
demonstrate that our watermarks are impervious to normal
work operations, for example, interpretation, revolution,
scaling, editing, smoothing, disentanglement,andresampling,
also asmalicious assaults, for example, the addition of

commotion, change of low-request bits, or even inclusion of
different watermarks.
4. David Megı´as, Josep Domingo-Ferrer, Multicast
dissemination of substance is not suited to content-based
electronic business sinceallpurchasersacquiretheverysame
duplicate of the substance, in a manner that unlawful
redistributors can't be followed. Unicast circulation has the
deficiency of requiring one association with every purchaser,
except it permits the vendor to install an alternate serial
number in the duplicate acquired by every purchaser, which
empowers redistributor following. Peer-topeer (P2P)
circulation is a third alternative which may join a portion of
the benefits of multicast and unicast: from one viewpoint, the
vendor just needs unicast associations with a couple seed
purchasers, who assume control over the errand of further
spreading the substance; then again, if a legitimate
fingerprinting component is utilized, unlawful redistributors
of the P2P-dispersed substance can even now be followed. In
this paper, we propose a novel fingerprinting system for P2P
content dissemination which permitsredistributorfollowing,
while saving the security of most legitimate purchasers and
offeringconspiracyresistanceandpurchaserframeproofness.
5. Karen Su, Deepa Kundurand Dimitrios Hatzinakosin2005,
In this paper, we display a hypothetical structure for the
straight intrigue investigation of watermarked advanced
video groupings, and determine another hypothesis
comparing a meaning of factual intangibility, plot resistance,
and two down to earth watermark configuration rules. The
proposed structure is basic and instinctive; the essential
preparing unit is the videoedgeandweconsidersecondorder
measurable portrayals of their worldly between connections.
Inside this expository setup, we characterize the straight
casing conspiracy assault, the scientific idea of a measurably
imperceptiblevideowatermark,anddemonstratethatthelast
is a compelling counterattack against the previous. At long
last, to show how the hypothetical outcomes nitty gritty in
this paper can undoubtedly be connected to the development
of plot safevideo watermarks, weexemplify the investigation
into two pragmatic video watermark configuration decides
that assume a key part in the consequent improvement of a
novel arrangement safe video watermarking calculation
talked about in a partner paper.
Algorithms
 HMAC algorithm
 RSA algorithm
 LIME algorithm
Enhancement
o In this venture we upgraded watermarking utilizing
stenography technique.
o Creating information as a mark utilizing HMAC
calculationand furthermoreencodethe information
utilizing RSA calculation.
o Bulk Outsourcing is to be finished
6. CONCLUSIONS
WeexhibitLIME,amodelforresponsibleinformation
exchange over different substances. We characterize taking
part parties, their interrelationships and give a solid
instantiationforaninformationexchangeconventionutilizing
vigorous watermarking and computerized marks. We
discover leaker in malignant environment utilizing
information heredity strategy.
7. REFERENCES
[1] S. Goldwasser, S.Micali , and R .L. Rivest ,”A digital
signature scheme secure against adaptive chosen-
message attacks,” SIAM J . Comput. , Vol.17.
[2] Emil Praun_Hugues Hoppey Adam Finkelstein Princeton
University,“Robust mesh watermarking ,”IEEETransactions
on multimedia vol.10 Issue 8 Dec-2008.
[3] Karen Su,Deepa Kundur and Dimitrios
Hatzinakos,”Statistical invisibility for collusion resistant
digital video watermarking,”IEEE Transactions on
multimedia,vol.7,No.1,Feb-2005.
[4] A. Mascher-Kampfer, H. St ¨ogner, and A. Uhl, “Multiple
re-watermarking scenarios,” in Proceedings of the 13th
International
Conference on Systems, Signals, andImageProcessing(IWSSIP
2006).
Citeseer, 2006, pp. 53–56.
[5] P. Papadimitriou and H. Garcia-Molina, “Data leakage
detection,”
Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol.
23, no. 1,
pp. 51–63, 2011.
[6] “Pairing-Based Cryptography Library (PBC),”
http://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc.
[7] I. J. Cox, J. Kilian, F. T. Leighton, and T. Shamoon, “Secure
spread
spectrum watermarking for multimedia,” Image Processing,
IEEE Transactions on, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1673–1687, 1997.
[8] B. Pfitzmann and M. Waidner, “Asymmetric
fingerprinting for larger
collusions,” in Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on
Computer
and communications security, ser. CCS ’97, 1997, pp. 151–
160.

[9] S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and R. L. Rivest, “A digital
signature scheme secure against adaptive chosen-message
attacks,” SIAM J. Comput.vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 281–308, 1988.
[10] A. Adelsbach, S. Katzenbeisser, and A.-R. Sadeghi, “A
computational model for watermark robustness,” in
Information Hiding. Springer, 2007, pp. 145–160.
[11] J. Kilian, F. T. Leighton, L. R. Matheson, T. G. Shamoon,R.
E. Tarjan, and F. Zane, “Resistance of digital watermarks to
collusive attacks,” in IEEE International Symposium on
Information Theory, 1998, pp. 271–271.
[12] M. Naor and B. Pinkas, “Efficient oblivious transfer
protocols,” in
Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on
Discrete
Algorithms, 2001, pp. 448–457.
[13] “GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library (GMP),”
http://gmplib.org/.
[14] D. Boneh, B. Lynn, and H. Shacham, “Short signatures
from the Weil pairing,” in AdvancesinCryptology-ASIACRYPT
2001. Springer,
2001, pp. 514–532.
[14] W. Dai, “Crypto++ Library,” http://cryptopp.com.
[15] P. Meerwald, “Watermarking toolbox,”
http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/_pmeerw/Watermarking/source.
[16] Y. Ishai, J. Kilian, K. Nissim, and E. Petrank, “Extending
oblivious
transfers efficiently,” in Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO
2003.
Springer, 2003, pp. 145–161.
[17] M. Backes, N. Grimm, and A. Kate, “Lime: Data lineage in
the
malicious environment,” in Security and Trust Management -
10th
International Workshop, STM 2014, Wroclaw, Poland,
September 10-11,
2014. Proceedings, 2014, pp. 183–187.
[18] R. Hasan, R. Sion, and M. Winslett, “The case of the fake
picasso:
Preventing historyforgery withsecure provenance,”inFAST,
2009, pp.
1–14.
[19] A. Pretschner, M. Hilty, F. Sch¨utz, C. Schaefer, and T.
Walter, “Usage Control Enforcement: Present and Future,”
IEEE Security & Privacy vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 44–53, 2008.
[20] F. Kelbert and A. Pretschner, “Data usage control
enforcement in
distributed systems,” in CODASPY, 2013, pp. 71–82.
[21] F. Salim, N. P. Sheppard, and R. Safavi-Naini, “A Rights
Management Approach to Securing Data Distribution in
Coalitions,” in NSS, 2010, pp. 560–567.
[22] N. P. Sheppard, R. Safavi-Naini, and P. Ogunbona,
“Secure multimedia authoringwithdishonestcollaborators,”
EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process., vol. 2004, pp. 2214–2223,
2004.
[23] G. S. Poh, “Design and Analysis of Fair Content Tracing
Protocols,”
Ph.D. dissertation, 2009.
R. Petrovic and B. Tehranchi, “Watermarkinginanencrypted
domain,”
Jul. 7 2006, uS Patent App. 11/482,519.
[24] R. Anderson and C. Manifavas, “Chameleon - A newkind
of stream
cipher,” in Fast SoftwareEncryption.Springer,1997,pp.107–
113.
[25] A.-R. Sadeghi, “Secure fingerprinting on sound
foundations,” Ph.D.
dissertation, 2004.
[26] J. Domingo-Ferrer,“Anonymousfingerprinting based on
committed
oblivious transfer,” in Public Key Cryptography. Springer,
1999, pp.
43–52.
[27] A.-R. Sadeghi, “How to break a semi-anonymous
fingerprinting
scheme,” in Information Hiding.Springer,2001,pp.384–394.

IRJET Secure Multimedia Content Protection and Sharing

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (17)

Similar to IRJET Secure Multimedia Content Protection and Sharing

Similar to IRJET Secure Multimedia Content Protection and Sharing (20)

More from IRJET Journal

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET Secure Multimedia Content Protection and Sharing