This study assessed the effectiveness of ultrasound guidance for peripheral IV access in pediatric patients. It was a prospective randomized study of 14 pediatric patients undergoing IV access, with 7 patients receiving ultrasound guidance and 7 receiving non-ultrasound methods. The ultrasound group had higher overall success rates, first attempt success rates, and shorter procedure times, with fewer attempts and redirections needed compared to the non-ultrasound group. The study concluded that ultrasound guidance improves the success and efficiency of IV placement in pediatric patients.

1. A PROSPECTIVE
RANDOMIZED STUDY TO
ASSESS EFFECTIVENESS
OF ULTRASOUND FOR
PERIPHERAL VASCULAR
ACCESS IN PEDIATRIC
PATIENTS
Presented by ;Mary Teenu
Guide: Dr. Deepak Agrawal

2. Problem statement
A prospective randomized
study to assess effectiveness
of ultrasound for peripheral
vascular access in pediatric
patients.

3. Introduction
• Vascular access in pediatric
patients is often more difficult
than adults because of the
smaller size of the vessels and
non-cooperation. Ultrasound is
an invaluable tool for vascular
access by nurses in this
population

4. Objectives
• To compare overall success rate
of iv insertion in ultrasound and
non ultrasound group
• To compare first IV line insertion
success rate of ultrasound and
non ultrasound group
• To compare average number of
attempts made in ultrasound and
non ultrasound group

5. Objectives
• To compare average needle
redirections in ultrasound and
non ultrasound group
• To compare IV line average
insertion time of ultrasound and
non ultrasound group

6. METHODOLOGY

7. Study design
• Prospective randomized study

8. Population
• Pediatric patients who require
peripheral IV line

9. Site
• All India Institute of Medical
Sciences, New Delhi

10. Setting
• Neurosurgery
ICU, JPNATC, AIIMS

11. Sampling technique
• Simple random sampling

12. Inclusion criteria
• Age <10 years
• Patients who require peripheral
vascular access

13. Study period
• 2 months (1st June- 31st July
2013)

14. Procedure
• Subjects were selected and
assigned randomly to group A
and group B.
– Group A subjects were cannulised
with the use of ultrasound
– Group B were cannulised without
any aid. First insertion success
rate, access time and complications
were compared between the two
groups

15. Ultra sound view of vein

16. RESULTS

17. TOTAL
SUBJECTS : 14
GROUP B: 7GROUP A: 7
Subject Distribution

18. Demographic data
Mean age (range)
Group A 6years (5 months to
8years)
Group B 5.2 years (9 months to
10 years)
N =14

19. Demographic data…
Male Female
Group A (n=7) 4 (57.14%) 3 (42.85%)
Group B (n=7) 5 (71.42%) 2 (28.57%)
N =14

20. Overall success rate
Group A (n=7) 6 (85.71%)
Group B (n=7) 4 (57.14%)
N =14

21. First IV line insertion success rate
Group A (n=7) 6 (85.71%)
Group B (n=7) 3 (42.85%)
N =14

22. Average number of attempts
made
Group A (n=7) 1.4
Group B (n=7) 4
N =14

23. Average needle redirections
Group A (n=7) 2.4
Group B (n=7) 5
N =14

24. Average time taken for the
procedure (Range)
Group A (n=7) 2.6 min (2- 5 min)
Group B (n=7) 3.3 min (2.5 - 6 min)
N =14

25. Conclusion
• In a sample of pediatric patients
ultrasound-guided intravenous
cannulation required less overall
time, fewer attempts, and fewer
needle redirections than
traditional approaches. Overall
success rate and first insertion
success rate is more in ultrasound
guided method.