The Unjustified Use Of Atomic Bombs On Japan

The Unjustified Use of Atomic Bombs on Japan
On December 7, 1941 Japan launched a surprise attack on a U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor in
Hawaii with the possibility of forcing the U.S. to join World War II. About 2,400 Americans were
dead, 21 ships had been sunk, and 188 aircrafts were destroyed. On August 6 and 9 of 1945, the U.S.
retaliated and dropped two atomic bombs called Fat Man and Little Boy on the Japanese cities of
Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The U.S. was not justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan because
of the locations that were bombed, the terms of the Potsdam Declaration, and the lack of previous
bomb testing. Firstly, the bombings were unjustified because of the locations where the bombs were
dropped. Neither cities were military or naval bases. Hiroshima was ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Japanese saw this as an incredible insult to their ruler, and therefore refused surrender (Lawton).
The only reason why America could follow through with the term of "The alternative for Japan is
prompt and utter destruction" ("Potsdam Declaration") was because it had made the terms of the
Potsdam Declaration completely disgraceful and unacceptable for Japan. Clive A. Lawton argues
"Many Japanese politicians would only agree to surrender if Emperor Hirohito remained on the
throne". Had the U.S. revised its treaty terms in order to keep Hirohito in power and leave at least
some of the Japanese military intact, Japan would have likely surrendered quicker and the bombs
would not be needed. Finally, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unjustified because of
the lack of testing. Although the project to design the first atomic bomb, codenamed the Manhattan
Project, began in 1941, the first bomb was not ready to be tested until the month before it would be
used in 1945. When it was tested at Trinity Site in New Mexico, the detonation caused unexpected
results ("The Manhattan Project"). It caused "A blinding flash visible for 200 miles lit up the
morning sky. A mushroom cloud reached 40,000 feet, blowing out windows of civilian homes up to
100 miles away. When the cloud returned to earth it created a half–mile wide crater metamorphosing
sand into glass" ("The
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Effects After Hiroshima Essay
The Affects After Hiroshima and Nagasaki Hiroshima was a horrific event in the world's history that
caused many after affects to thousands of people. On August 6, 1945 the "Little Boy", the first
atomic bomb, was dropped to annihilate Hiroshima, Japan, which did its exact purpose. Also August
9, 1945 the "Fat Man", the second atomic bomb, hit Nagasaki, Japan, leaving Nagasaki in ruins.
283,508 people survived and 6,500 children were orphaned. Both of the bombs killed thousands of
people, and left people, governments, and nations with beneficial and negative after affects as in
health, economic, and political. The health effect is the biggest out of the three, because many
people developed illnesses and defects. Economic is the second biggest effect, because the Japanese
government had to spend millions of dollars to rebuild the two cities. Political is the third biggest
effect, because it affected the campaigns of the Japanese and also the United States, and the
Occupation Press Code was invented, helping handicap people that were affected by the two atomic
bombs. When the bomb that hit Hiroshima, "Little Boy", light and radiation that was compacted in it
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Genshi bakudan,"atomic bomb", could not be used in print publicly, without legal consequences,
which included magazines, movies, and newspaper. December 12, 1945, "GHQ" was issued to stop
scientists and media companies from studying or publicizing anything on the two bombings,
including health defects in people. Most people that survived in the two cities, Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, were either orphaned elderly or children, or they had broken families because of the lost,
and they and to live in ignorance because of "GHQ". 90% of the doctors became victims of the
bombs, and it led 20 doctors being able to help heal people. The people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
had to live in ignorance since they couldn't say anything to

Atomic Bomb Vs Nagasaki Essay
An atomic bomb's level of destruction is significantly larger than traditional bombs. The power level
of the two are on different levels. This is dictated by the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which
involved the atomic bomb. The results can be compared to those of the bombing of Tokyo which
involved traditional bombs.
The atomic bomb and traditional bombs are made of different components. The "Little Boy" atomic
bomb dropped on Hiroshima had 560 grams of Uranium 235 which uses nuclear fission to detonate
(Chen: Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) The "Fat Man" atomic bomb used at Nagasaki
has 6.4 kilograms of Plutonium 239. Unlike the atomic bomb, the conventional bombs used 325 B–
29s and over 4.5 million pounds of incendiaries (Atomic Bomb Museum). Traditional bombs merely
uses flammables while the atomic bomb used nuclear technology. This is not the only way that the
two bombs differ.
Atomic bombs are a lot more powerful compared to traditional bombs in terms of the death toll. At
Hiroshima 66 thousand people were killed instantly but the total number of deaths is approximately
200 thousand. At Nagasaki 30 thousand people were killed instantly and the total number of deaths
is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The radiation from the atomic bomb caused black rain, which is radioactive water. The atomic bomb
also caused radioactivity in not only water but many other parts of the environment such as the soil.
Therefore the community that lives or depends on it is also effected. The radiation has effects that
can still be seen. Organisms exposed to the radiation (or radioactivity caused by radiation) had a
possibility of becoming mutated. (Atomic Bomb Museum) The mutations and radioactivity resulting
from the radiation which came from the atomic bomb is what makes its power so massive. It is also
what separates the atomic bomb from conventional

The Hiroshima Diary
The dropping an atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima resulted in one of the greatest
destructions in history, but it is argued that the bombing was crucial to ending WWII. During the
1920s, Japan started to westernize and become more democratic with a two party system. Unions
started to form and workers started to gain more rights. However, all of this started to change when
the Great Depression hit Japan hard in the 1930s. The economy completely crashed and it caused
people to start to doubt capitalism and democracy, especially among the wealthy class. The public
started to seek a strong militaristic leader, and a strong sense of nationalism formed. The militaristic
leaders were eventually able to gain enough support and take over the government. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The atomic bomb was cruel and deathly for the citizens of Nagasaki and Japan. This is described in
the Hiroshima Diary, the journal a Japanese physician about the affects of the bombing, "The view
where a moment before all had been so bright and sunny was now dark and hazy... What had
happened? All over the right side of m body I was bleeding... My private nurse set about examining
my wounds without speaking a word. No one spoke... Why was everyone so quiet? The heat finally
became too intense to endure... Those who could fled; those who could not perished..." This
document shows how gruesome the effects of the war were. Document seven also shows us the
heartbreaking pictures of Nagasaki after the bombing. You are able to see the smoke and smolder in
the pictures. The pictures also depict the injuries many Japanese citizens went though. Something
that you cannot see in the pictures, is the radiation in the air. Nagasaki and Hiroshima still give
precautions about the radiation in the ground and air today. The US has been criticized by using a
weapon that caused so much death and killing many innocent people as well. Admiral William E.
Leahy wrote in his memoirs about his opinion on the bomb droppings, "The use of this barbarous
weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The
Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender... In being the first to use it, we... adopted an
ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that
fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children." Admiral Leahy made very
strong points about the US using values from the Middle Ages. He argues that a war cannot be won
by killing so many innocent people. The dropping of an atomic bomb over Hiroshima caused the
death of

The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay
The atomic bombing of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 is the most
controversial military decision in the history of Air Power, and may even be the most controversial
decision in history. The first of the bombings happened at Hiroshima, where the B–29 Superfortress
Enola Gay dropped Little Boy, an Uranium–based atomic bomb. Structural damage estimates vary,
with some sources claiming the blast and fires destroyed about 90% of the city (History.com Staff
"Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki") and some estimating a little more than a third of the
buildings were destroyed or severely damaged (""The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki."). Most sources estimate about a third of the population of the 300,000–person city died
in the immediate explosion (Wright), with tens of thousands more dying in the subsequent days as a
result of wounds and radiation. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki led directly to the
unconditional surrender of the Japanese Empire and the end of World War 2, and indirectly caused
the Cold War between the United States and the USSR. Initially, historians took Churchill and
Truman's justifications that the bomb was dropped to end the war quickly, and that was the end of
the argument. Throughout time, revisionists have challenged that notion and argued that the bombs
were not necessary for ending the war in Japan in a timely fashion, and it was merely an unethical,
immoral show of power to the Soviets at the expense of the Japanese

The Atomic Bombs in Japan
On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima
without any precedent. The explosion viciously destroyed four square miles of the city and killed
90,000 and injured 40,000. (Weber, "Was Hiroshima Necessary?") Three days later, a second atomic
bomb stroked the city of Nagasaki which killed approximately 37,000 people and injured 43,000
(Weber, "Was Hiroshima Necessary?"). These actions of the United States still remain controversial
today and the United States' abuse of power and morality can be questioned. 'Were the dropping of
atomic bombs in the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki a justified way to end World War Two?'. The
answer is no, the bombings were not justified as Japan was already ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
People leaving in these cities also suffered severe physical injuries such as high degree burns. Also,
many civilians died from getting exposed the fission products and the leftover radiation from the
explosion. The highly radioactive environment was very atrocious in a way that it killed thousands
of people in matter of hours and raised the risk of getting cancer over a few decades. To add on, the
flying debris, collapsing infrastructures such as bridges, roads and building brought an enormous
threat to the residents. The bombings were simply gratuitous and can be viewed as a total disdain for
human lives. However, to address the other side of the argument, President Truman had advocated
his use of the nuclear weapons as he stated in his letter to Kupcinet, "It [the dropping of the atomic
bombs] were done to save 125,00 youngsters on the American side and 125,000 on the Japanese side
from getting killed and that is what it did. It probably also saved a half million youngsters on both
sides from being maimed for life." ("Harry Truman on Dropping of the Atomic Bomb"). As
President Truman asserts, the bombs technically did save lives as the estimated number of death
casualties of American soldiers was approximately 5,000,000 if the United States were to invade
Japan. However, the actions of the United States can be criticized as the fact remains that it was an
act of violent destruction that targeted deliberately at

Why Is The Atomic Bomb Wrong
The Atomic Bomb Two atomic bombs were dropped by the United States on Japan in order to stop
World War II. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. The second atomic
bomb was dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. These were the deadliest bombings in history.
Twoo scientists played an important part in the science behind the atomic bomb. The scientist that
created the theory of converting mass into energy, e = mc2 , was Albert Einstein. Energy is
represented by e, mass is m, and c is the speed of light. The destructive energy released when mass
is turned into energy makes the atomic bomb the most deadliest weapon ever used. Leo Szilard was
also an important scientist in developing the atomic bomb. He was instrumental in ... Show more
They are too powerful. However, at the end of World War II, we needed to use the atomic bomb.
Many Americans had already died at the hand of the Japanese. It looked as if Japan would not
surrender without an American invasion of Japan. This would have most likely caused the death of
thousands of more Americans as well as more Japanese. At that time, there was no fear of
retaliation, we were the only country in possession of the atomic bomb. However, that is no longer
the case. Now more countries possess atomic weapons. Also, the weapons are far more

The Effects Of Atomic Bombings On Hiroshima And Nagasaki
The U.S indeed should've dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. First of all, if the
United States would not have dropped the bombs, many more Japanese lives would've been lost and
many more communities and cities would've been destroyed. While the total amount of Japanese
casualties between the two bombs is estimated around 200,000 Japanese lives, not dropping the
bomb would've resulted in allied ground invasions and conventional strategic bombing by the U.S,
such as the one that killed over 120,000 in the firebombing of Tokyo (History.com), which would've
led to many more American and Japanese deaths. Another positive effect the atomic bombings had
was it caused the Soviet Union to take notice of the military power of the U.S. and

Compare And Contrast Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki
I do not think the United States was justified when dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki because it should of been considered a war crime, the attack was unnecessary and Japan
was already on the verge of surrendering. A war crime is torturing/giving inhumane treatment to
humans or causing serious injury to one's body and or health When the United states dropped the
atomic bomb on Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945, 90,000–146,000–civilians lives were lost. Three
days later, on August 9th, the United states dropped a second bomb on Nagasaki instantly killing
40,000 people overall killing 50,000. Since it was virtually impossible to count every single person
who perished in these bombings it is estimated that 225,000 people passed

Introduction: Today, I will discuss an unimaginable event witnessed as the blast heated beneath the
ground at 5,000 degrees and contained the magnitude of 20,000 tons of TNT. This is the world's first
exposure to nuclear energy came with the detonation of two Japanese cities. Learning and
understanding enable us to create a better picture of the world. In doing research, Steve Sheiken, a
historical researcher concluded, "Of the 76,00 buildings that stood...70,000 were destroyed in
Hiroshima (Sheinkin, 204)." I am here only to inform the effects of the atomic bombing, impacting
Japanese lives. These attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki remain as one of the most infamous
tragedies in history, mainly because of the large number of casualties that shattered Japan's
invincibility, leading to the Nuclear Era. Forecast: The focus of this speech provides knowledge of
Japanese casualties, invincibility and the evolution of the Nuclear Era. Body Paragraph #1:
Seventy–one years ago, the destruction of Japanese cities by bombs caused a large number of
casualties. At 8:15 A.M on August 6, 1945, the United States released the atomic bomb. Sheinkin
reported a flash of light followed immediately by "a mushroom cloud rose approximately 30,000
feet; vaporizing anyone within 1,000 yards in its path (Sheinkin, )". The Shockwave destroyed, even
more, lives. The Japanese government stated, "About 70,000 people were dead already. Over
100,000 more would die of wounds, burns, and radiation

Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki: An Analysis
Approximately 70,000 people died immediately in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, Japan.
Another 70,000 died over the course of 5 years from radiation poisoning (Rosenberg, Jennifer. "The
Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki"). All of those people were innocent civilians. They
lost not only their life, but also their rights; specifically their right to life. The right to life is the
human rights issue in the novel, but it also affects the United States, since the United States has to
follow that law, and Japan, since Japan lost over 140,000 people in the bombing.
To begin with, the human rights issue in my novel is the right to life and the right to life relates to
real–life issues. The reason why the human rights issue in my novel is the right to life is because, in
the novel, it states that over 60,000 Japanese men, women and children were killed by the atomic
bomb. All of those people were ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States not only created the atomic bomb, but also dropped the atomic bomb on
Hiroshima. The atomic bomb killed thousands of Japanese people and obliterated Hiroshima. All of
those people were innocent and lost their lives along with their right to life. That is not the only way
the human rights issue in my novel affects the United States. Since the United States is a member of
the United Nations and also agreed to obey the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United
States violated article three and article thirty of the declaration. Article three gives people the right
to life and article thirty backs up all of the rights in the declaration, including article three ("The
Universal Declaration of Human Rights."). The United States created the atomic bomb and killed
about 140,000 innocent Japanese civilians. The United States not only killed them, but also took
away their right to life; therefore, violating article three and article thirty of the Universal
Declaration of Human

Essay on Atomic Bombing on Japan
Hiroshima: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb a Military Necessity? On the morning of August 6th,
1945 at around 8:16 a.m., the United States dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima. This bomb was
given the nickname "Little Boy." Three days after the first atomic bomb was dropped, on August
9th, 1945 at around 11:02 a.m., the United States dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. This
bomb was given the nickname "Fat Man." These two bombs immensely destroyed these cities and
took the lives of many people. There was an estimated 200,000 lives taken in the atomic bombing on
Japan. The war on the Pacific had been going on for over four years before the atomic bombing
occurred. There were two big battles that could have led to the United State's ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, on the morning of December 7th, 1941, the Japanese decided to implement surprised
attacks on Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor was a US Navy base located in Hawaii. The United States was
not expecting these attacks at all. I feel that the attack on Hiroshima was retaliation for the attacks
on Pearl Harbor. Although we may have gone a little over board, it had to be done to establish that
the US was not a nation to be messed with. The Japanese's opportunity to fight back was over after
the first atomic bomb was discharged because the navy was taken out, the inability to import food
and the lack of industrial supplies. In addition the second atomic bomb was dropped to seal the
victory over Japan. Although both Japan and the United States suffered great losses from the
altercations, Japan was left with much more trauma. The first atomic bomb that was dropped on
Hiroshima immediately killed an estimated amount of 66,000 people out of a population of 255,000.
The second bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki instantly killed about 35,000 people. However, a
numerous amount of soldiers and citizens of Japan did not immediately die. These bombings lead to
an awful amount of physical effects that dismembered the country of Japan for many years. Many
individuals of Japan either died or suffered from radiation burns, cancer, leukemia, and many other
physical disorders. Research shows that

The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
The Bomb The atomic bomb was initially created during the time period directly preceding, and
including, World War II. Although the United States was the first nation to actually utilize this
devastating weapon in a combat situation, it is significant to note that several other nations,
including Russia and Germany, were also rapidly attempting to manifest the technology that could
produce this devastating weapon. The U.S. utilized this weapon against the cities of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki within two days of each other to conclude the war with the triumph of the Allied powers.
Japan was largely chosen as a target since it represented the last of the efforts of the Axis powers
which included Germany and Italy to win World War II. The widespread destruction sown in both of
the aforementioned cities, however, quickly led to Japan's surrender and the end of the war. When
examining the question of whether or not the atomic bomb should have been used against Japan to
conclude the war, it is highly prudent to note that Japan is an eastern country and had very little
access to nuclear weaponry of its own. It seems significant that the U.S. which is a western nation
chose not to bomb another western power such as Italy or Germany (both of which may have had
access to nuclear weaponry at the time), but instead bombed an eastern nation. When one pauses to
consider the vast numbers of innocent people who were killed or indelibly injured by the bombing
of both of these Japanese

President Obama's Opinion On Hiroshima Nagasaki Atomic...
1. The main argument of the opinion is the evils of the revenge mentality with respect to Hiroshima
Nagasaki atomic bombing. The opinion does not totally alienate Japan from the build up to the
atomic irradiation of 74,000 people. What the piece has to say about the bombing in order words is
that America should apologise for incinerating 74000 civilians and only 135 military personnel.
2. The immediate reason why the writer thinks it to be regrettable that America still avoids the
reality of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is that president Obama happens to be the only American
President to go to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki peace memorial. On the other hand, the remote
reason why the author sounds in a regrettable manner is as a result of how Americans

Was The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?
In Potsdam, Germany, President Truman along with Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill issued the
ultimatum on July 26, 1945. The ultimatum contained the terms of unconditional surrender and no
warning that if Japanese leaders rejected these terms, they should expect a "rain of ruin (Truman,
"Draft Statement on the Dropping of the Bomb")." Some historians believe that if in that ultimatum
Truman were to warn Japan of a possible atomic bombing, Japan would have surrendered before
any bombing had occurred. Because of the uncertainty of the bomb's success and the hard–headed
Japanese government seeing this as a sign of weakness, Truman disregarded this thought (May,
"Atomic Bomb: Was the Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Justified?"). Another

How Can The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Be...
Can the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be justified? Others may not agree with me,
but I believe that the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki cannot be justified. Yes, it was
one of the main factors in stopping the war, however, morally and ethnically it, in my opinion, was
wrong. First of all, Truman used it to scare the Soviet Union. Which was a very childish, and
irrational reason to drop an ATOMIC bomb on a country. The Soviet Union was still quite strong,
and still had quite a big army while most of the other countries armies were deflating. However,
Truman shouldn't have dropped a bomb on a country just to scare another country, and try to
convince them that their not worth the fight. Second of all, Truman may have dropped

Was Truman Justified In Using The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima...
On August 6th, 1945, after 44 weeks of vicious fighting, a bomber plane containing a newly
developed atomic weapon appeared over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Moments later, this atomic
bomb dropped, instantaneously killing 70,000 citizens and damaging the city. In the short span of
three days, the United States dropped a second destructive bomb over the town of Nagasaki with
similarly disastrous results. While these destructive bombings brought harm, they also contributed to
the Japanese surrender, which concluded the war. Leaving the question, was Truman justified in
using the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? While I respect the opposing side, I maintain
the viewpoint that Truman was not justified in the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki for many reasons. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Hiroshima, the bomb left 66,000 dead and a staggering 69,000 injured. Additionally, in the city of
Nagasaki, 39,000 were killed and 25,000 injured. One survivor Yoshitaka Kawamoto, who was only
thirteen years old at the Hiroshima bombing recounts his horrifying experience, " All I can
remember was a pale lightning flash for two or three seconds. Then, I collapsed. I crawled over the
debris ... Then, I found one of my classmates lying alive. ... It is hard to tell, his skull was cracked
open, his flesh was dangling out from his head. These bombings targeted innocent civilians and
killed indiscriminately, killing the young and the old all at once. As well as instantaneously killing
civilians, atomic weapons were unique in the sense that they continued killing many from the side
effects of

How Did We Drop The Atomic Bombs On The Cities Of...
Bombing Japan
After Japan dropped a bomb on the U.S. we dropped bombs on them, if we didn't it would be
different. Why did we drop the bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,what would happen
if we didn't.
Why did we drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? First it is because they
bombed Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. Second Japan wouldn't sign an unconditional surrender the Pacific
War continued.(atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) Third after the bombing of Hiroshima
the president ,Harry S. Truman, called for their surrender on August 6,1945. On August 9,1945 we
bombed Nagasaki (atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki).
Second dropping the atomic bombs (Little Boy) and (Fat Man) on the cities of Hiroshima and

World War Ii Research Paper: Hiroshima and Nagasaki
In the midst of World War II, August 1945, the United States unleashed the first ever atomic bomb
attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The usage of the atomic bomb was effective, but at the same
time devastating and unnecessary. The United States should not have dropped the atomic bomb
because it maimed countless of Japanese civilians, caused radiation poisoning whose effects
impacted future generations, left both cities in ruins, left citizens homeless, and it was absolutely
unmoral for the United States to have created such havoc and chaos in these two cities. Being there
on the day Hiroshima was struck by the atomic bomb, junior high student,
Akihiro Takahashi remembers the horrors of that fateful day as he was interviewed saying, "I saw ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I found that all the houses around there had collapsed for as far as I could see."[viii] At first glance
after the disaster of the event, the whole city seemed desolate, completely wiped out with a single
bomb, the atomic bomb. Everything once held near and dear, everything known as familiar, was
gone, within a matter of seconds. The atomic bomb annihilated everything in its path, leaving the
cities it devastated in absolute ruins. Due to the staggering loss of buildings after the atomic bomb
was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, countless were left homeless and starving. Sueko Hada,
though reluctant to talk about her ordeal in Hiroshima, opened up during an interview stating, "I had
nowhere to go. A soldier took pity on me, gave me some money and told me to take the train to his
grandmother's house. But on the train a woman stole all my belongings. Then someone else offered
to take me to my elementary school."[ix] After the atomic bomb wiped out many of the buildings
and houses, many who were lucky enough to survive the blast, struggled with the difficulty to live
because they were lacking houses and the resources necessary to carry on. Many survivors such as
Hada had nowhere to go; circumstances were especially dire if one was the sole survivor within the
family, making one have to suffer the hardships in isolation, just as in Hada's situation. Along with
having a

Hiroshima Bombing Research Paper
On August 6, 1945, an experimental form of warfare hit Dr. Shima's office in Hiroshima, vaporizing
a woman half a mile away in 0.15 seconds (Norris). This form of warfare was a supreme form of
weaponry that was termed the nuclear bomb. The bombs that hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan,
were dubbed the "Little Boy" and "Fat Man", respectively, and they killed approximately 200,000
people after one week of impact. Health problems such as cancer (breast, lung, and thyroid), in–
utero defects, and radiation–linked chromosomal change haunted and killed an even larger group of
people months or years after the initial events (Shoten). The power of an atomic bomb still worries
people to this day, especially those who have witnessed the utter destruction ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
For the first time in history, the world saw the potential destruction caused by certain devices, such
as the atomic bomb. The atomic bomb could massacre thousands of citizens in one go, tear down
buildings of all sizes, and destroy a strong nation's economy. The world now knew what could
happen in a WWIII scenario. Now, almost every country knows how to construct a nuclear fission
bomb and some countries are even working on creating a hydrogen bomb (nuclear fusion). The
destruction that can be caused by one atomic bomb is plenty to force a country into surrender, as
multiple atomic bombs could obliterate a whole continent. Such a scenario took place when the
Soviet Union and the United States were in the Cold War. Either side had atomic weapons
stockpiled and a few buttons could have ended the lives of millions of innocents. During the
bombing of Hiroshima, death was painless, but the long–term damage dealt to survivors caused
immense pain. Survivors dealt with thick, figure–altering keloid scars all over their face and chest,
agony from untreated cancer, cataract, and infected wounds from untreated cuts. After the world saw
how two bombs affected the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, people understood that no one was
safe (Shoten). After the bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, an extreme fear of future warfare was
placed on the

Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Essay
President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were
the direct cause for the end of World War II in the Pacific. The United States felt it was necessary to
drop the atomic bombs on these two cities or it would suffer more casualties. Not only could the
lives of many soldiers have been taken, but possibly the lives of many innocent Americans. The
United States will always try to avoid the loss of American civilians at all costs, even if that means
taking lives of another countries innocent civilians. A huge proponent to the use of the atomic bomb
on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9 of 1945 was President Harry Truman.
Although they value the ideas and contributions out in by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
In a diplomatic sense, the U.S, needed to drop those bombs to end the war according to the president
at that time, Harry Truman. This was necessary to stop any plans the Japanese had about bringing
the war to United States soil. In a political manner, the use of the atomic bomb put an end to the
Japanese military dictatorship and put in place a constitutional monarchy, similar to the United
Kingdom's. Even though they still have an emperor, the power rests in the hands of politicians. This
helped stop the spread of communism here. However, it is difficult to make a case for the ethics in
the use of the atomic bombing of Japan. Although it may have been needed to end the war, war, in
any manner, is never ethical and all those innocent people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki should not
have died. 3) Although the use of the atomic bomb on the country of Japan was an awful way to
bring about the end of World War II in the Pacific, it was not a terrorist attack. Nowadays, a terrorist
attack is looked at like an act of hate committed for a reason personal to the terrorist. The United
States had reason to drop the bombs on Japan, and after all, they were attacked first. There are
unwritten rules of war, and the United States may have broken one by attacking innocent civilians,
but they were protecting their own. The United States has always been pro–active when it comes to
the safety of its citizens and this was just

Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified
The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima August 6th and 9th, 1945 were very fateful days for
America and Japan. These were the days that America had taken control of world war 2. "Fat man"
and "Little boy" were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was a big step for America, being the
first to deploy the atomic bomb they had a major advantage over other countries. A major question
that has always been asked, why did America target those cities and were they justified in their
actions. America had to have reasons for deciding to bomb Japan, but what were they. Two men,
General Groves and Admiral Purnell believed that if Japan was bombed they would surrender. "Two
senior American figures, General Groves and Admiral Purnell thought that two atomic

Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bombings
Only three atomic bombs have been dropped in history. Little boy, was dropped on the Japanese city
of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. Fat man was dropped on Japan's capital, Nagasaki on August 9,
1945. And finally, Trinity was the code name for a test bomb which was a replica of Fat man. It was
dropped on July 16, 1945 in New Mexico. A fourth bomb, named thin man, was proposed and
scientists worked on it until it was aborted. These bombs were all used for war purposes in World
War two. The code name for the making of these bombs was the Manhattan Project. It started
formally in 1942. The US led it but was supported by the United Kingdom and Canada. US
president Franklin Roosevelt approved of it in late 1941. It was created for fear Germany was
making Atomic Bombs. It employed almost 130,000 people including brilliant scientists such as
Albert Einstein. There were over 30 sites in the US, UK, and Canada where research and
development took place. It costed 2 billion US dollars, now the equivalent of 26 billion in 2014. The
Manhattan Project was under the direction of Major General Leslie Groves of the US Army Corps of
Engineers from 1942 to 1946. There were two types of bombs created. A gun type fission
weapon(little boy) and an implosion type weapon(fat man). There was no warning of the first atomic
bomb for Hiroshima. There was however a warning for Nagasaki. Leaflets were dropped all over the
cities of Japan warning of a second atomic bomb, just as deadly as the first. Kokura

The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Did the atomic bomb have to be used in World War II on Japan? There were multiple reasons why
the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary. One of which is to reduce the
chance of Allied casualties if the war continued. Another reason was to prohibit the possibility that
an Axis country such as Nazi Germany, could create an atomic weapon. A third reason or is whether
or not the use of atomic weapons on innocent people was worth the media backlash. A final reason
is that the work the Americans and British did on the atomic bomb, would be an evolution of
modern–day weaponry. The opinions on the atomic bomb and its use have been questioned for the
past 69 years. The creation and use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The chances of a Japanese comeback were very unlikely but did present a small risk in not using the
atomic bomb when given the opportunity. Another reason or ideology in why the creation of the
atomic bomb was necessary, was to be able to end the war quickly if another nation, such as
Germany developed one. Germany had begun it's desire to research the atomic bomb before it
capture the Norsk Heavy Water Plant (Yass 47). However, the only way that the Germans could
develop anything close to an atomic bomb was by the creation of heavy water. Hidden in the
mountains of Norway, the Germans attacked the Norsk Heavy Water Plant to potentially fulfill their
desire to create atomic weapons. After sometime the heavy water plant was in full action under
German control. The British found out about the water plant being used and wanted to destroy it as
soon as possible. The British, who were also working on atomic weapons, knew exactly what the
resources needed for an atomic weapon were. A group of Norwegian special forces who escaped
from Norway, were compiled to attack the heavy water plant and destroy any progress the Germans
had made towards atomic weapons. The attack on the plant was considered successful, however, the
Germans did rebuild the part of the plant that was destroyed from the explosives used on it. The
British found out about the repairing of

Why Is Hiroshima Wrong
Bombing of Hiroshima
Introduction
Of all the political and military choices ever, few have been liable to a bigger number of
investigation and remark than the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Miles, 1985,121).
Researchers in the field have thought about the vexing inquiry of why the United States chose to
utilize the atomic bomb close to the finish of the Second World War. A watchful investigation of the
basic occasions paving the way to 6 August 1945 offers numerous particular clarifications.
Contemporary exchanges on the topic present a large group of speculations yet taken independently
they are a long way from fulfilling.
Maybe, President Harry Truman's choice to drop the bomb on Japan was a perfection of military,
political ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As ahead of schedule as December of 1945, be that as it may, a gathering of "war casualties'
affiliations" had been met to manage dissemination of wood, nails and glass sheets, and in addition
charcoal and electrical warming gadgets. The committee additionally managed quick issues, for
example, consideration of vagrants, group bathhouses, and utilization of distribution centers in
neighboring towns for group lodging. At the point when sustenance lack turned out to be particularly
intense in the mid year of 1946, the city forced necessary departure of 50,000 people to
encompassing ranch towns, and organized help rice supplies to be

What Was The Decisive Factor For The Atomic Bombings Of...
What was the decisive factor that lead to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Song
Soo Keun 004180–0205 UWCSEA East Section A: Plan of Investigation Between 1941~1945,
along with the war against the Nazis in Europe, the US was engaged in active war against Japan
following the attack on Pearl Harbour. At this time(1944), Soviets had survived the attack on the
eastern front and remained standing as a power that would soon directly oppose the ideologies of the
US and its allies. To determine the decisive factor that brought about the decision to use the bombs
on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, this investigation will examine the factors and views of
those responsible for the bombings, as well as alternatives that existed. This will require insight of
Truman's interaction with his military officials and allies, especially with Russia, as well as possible
negotiations with Japan that may have happened prior to the bombings. Word count: 130 Section B:
Evaluation of sources Source 1: The first seminal source is The decision to bomb, an article written
by Louis Morton on the decision to use the bombs. The purpose of the extract was to discuss the
factors that contributed to the decision of using the bombs, published by foreign affairs by the US.
As the title suggests, the extract holds a strong value to the investigation as it's content is purely
based on the decision to use the bomb, and is held up by

Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay
The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
On the 6th and 9th of August, 1945, nearing the end of WWII, the United States dropped two atomic
bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombs were some of the first atomic
weaponry to be used. The bombs were equivalent to over 20,000 tons of TNT, and wiped out the
two cities, killing tens of thousands of people, and wounded just as many. The first bomb hit
Hiroshima on the 6th of August, directly above a hospital, which was considered ground zero to the
blast. People were still trying to comprehend what had happened in Hiroshima when another bomb
was dropped three days later in Nagasaki.
There is lots of controversy on whether the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Some
people believe that it was necessary in ending the war, and minimizing the casualties. Others think it
was unnecessarily cruel and caused the loss of too many innocent lives.
I am going to be writing about the perspectives of Karl T. Compton and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Compton believed that even though Japan was starting to lose the war, they would continue to fight
for as long as they could. The Americans didn't know long they would continue this, so the bombing
quickly led to Japan's surrender and the end of the war. Some Historians believe that the old
Japanese code of bushido, was a reason the Japanese were resistance in surrendering. One Air Force
account said "The Japanese code of bushido–'the way of the warrior'–was deeply ingrained. The
concept of Yamato–damashii equipped each soldier with a strict code: never be captured, never
break down, and never surrender. Surrender was dishonorable. Each soldier was trained to fight to
the death and was expected to die before suffering dishonor. Defeated Japanese leaders preferred to
take their own lives in the painful samurai ritual of seppuku. Warriors who surrendered were not
deemed worthy of regard or

The Justifications Of The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And...
The justifications of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been continuously
debated since the time of occurrence. The variety of approaches towards the topic often times lead to
ambiguous conclusions that leave debaters dumbfounded. Primarily, there are two moral reasonings
that analysts of the event utilize: the utilitarian approach and ethical tradition. The utilitarian
approach determines the goodness or evil of an action by its consequences (Holt). It has been said
that this approach led the United States to reduce innocents to instruments and morality to arithmetic
during World War II (Holt).
By contrast, ethical tradition rooting from Judeo–Christian theology holds that some actions cannot
be justified by their consequences, rather they are absolutely forbidden (Holt). The problem is,
however, that this absolutist morality is difficult to apply to war. This tradition does hold attacking a
military target knowing some innocents will die as a side effect as permissible (Holt). The utilitarian
approach tends to support the decision to use the atomic bombs when the consequences are believed
to be believed to be beneficial towards the nation's interest. Ethical tradition tends to view the use of
atomic bombs as an atrocious action of the United States. A viewpoint that mediates between the
two approaches, however, is given the circumstances of World War II in 1945, the atomic bombings
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki can be excused but not justified.
Truman's

The Justification Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima Justified
Was Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Justified? Second World War was one of the most
devastating wars of all time. The War started when Germany invaded Poland which led Britain and
France declaring war on Nazi Germany in 1939. Meanwhile, the Marco Polo Bridge incident led to
war between China and Japan. President Roosevelt declared the United States as a neutral country
which would not participate in the war. Even though the United States was a neutral country,
Japanese air bombed Pearl Harbor, a United States Naval Base located in Hawaii on December 7,
1941. This attack led to the death of over 2400 Americans. Because of the attack on Pearl Harbor
United States was forced to enter the War. The United States fought alongside the Allied Powers on
two different fronts, European and the Pacific front, for the next four years. Allied Powers finally
won after Germany surrendered about a week after their Nazi leader Adolf Hitler's suicide on May
8, 1945. Japanese did fight for another four months and then surrendered on September 2, 1945,
after the United States dropped two Atomic Bombs on Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The
Bombing of these two cities has been the talk of dispute ever since. Many believe that the bombing
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified because it ended the war, while others say it was
unjustified because the war would have ended even if the atomic bombs weren't used. Many
American leaders believed that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was

The Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings. Genocide or Not?
The Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings. Genocide or not? ! The bombings of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki occurred on 6–9 August 1945. As stated by Jennifer Rosenberg: ''Unlike many other
bombing raids, the goal for this raid had not been a military installation but rather an entire city.''1
The US wanted to scare the Japanese out of the war. The possible targets of the bombings were:
Hiroshima, Kokura, Nagasaki and Niigata. Kyoto was one of the choices as well, but it was removed
from the list. ''The cities were chosen because they had been relatively untouched during the war.''2
The bomb «Little Boy» was dropped on Hiroshima by the crew of a B–29 Superfortress «Enola
Gay» bomber. On 9th of August it was followed by the bomb «Fat Man» that was ... Show more
But in order to tell whether it was an act of genocide or not, we have to know if there was any intent
to destroy the population of Japan in part or in whole. The bombings caused have caused a debate
over them. As former US Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson said: ''The atomic bomb was more
than a weapon of terrible destruction; it was a psychological weapon.'' Psychological weapon, in a
sense that in Japan it was dishonorable to surrender, so the Americans have understood, that
invading Japan would be useless. What they could have gotten with the invasion of Japan is a great
amount of casualties. Rather than losing their own people, the US decided to scare the Japanese out
of the war, which means that there was no intent to destroy Japanese neither in whole nor in part. !
Although the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are meeting all the criteria, listed in the Article 2
of the United Nations Convention on Genocide, except for one (Forcibly transferring children of the
group to another group), we can clearly see that it was not a case of genocide. The original goals of
the United States were both to stop the war as soon as possible by scaring Japan out of it and to gain
knowledge of the use of atomic bombs on populated areas.
5
Hiroshima and Nagasaki remembered, The Nagasaki Story, http://www.hiroshima–
remembered.com/

The Atomic Bombings Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki
As its name implies, World War II affected every country on earth either directly or indirectly. Thus,
school children in every country learn about the war, though the exact ideas that make up their
education differ, stemming from the wartime experiences of the country the students reside in.
Naturally, students' educations tend to focus on events that occurred more locally, or most deeply
affected their area; German students learn more about the Holocaust and Japanese students learn
more about the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even if a country wanted to teach a
completely inclusive account of World War II, the length and complexity of the war would make
that impossible within the constraints of traditional education. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Thus, governments on the federal and state levels create learning standards mandating which topics
should be covered in classrooms in their jurisdictions. In addition, companies that produce textbooks
decide which events to emphasize, and thus, which events to gloss over, in their materials. Everyone
given the opportunity makes the choice to include the events they do because he or she feels that
education about these events will positively impact students' understanding of their country's roots
and contemporary situation. Nevertheless, students in different countries have vastly different roots
to understand and political climates to analyze, causing decisions coming from the same well–
meaning intentions to have vastly different results.
When it comes to paring down what to teach students, World War II exists as an almost extreme
example. Not only would the large quantity of events be an overwhelming undertaking to teach in
their entirety, but the experiences of countries around the globe varied so vastly that students from
different countries seeking to understand the roots of their respective country's experiences are
seeking very different knowledge. For example, the leadership of each involved country's
government and military could be applicable to students anywhere in the world. Yet, only British
students spend a unit learning about the rise of Winston Churchill's leadership (The National). Even
though students globally could benefit from the

Persuasive Essay On 1984 By George Orwell
In a Blink of an Eye The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a turning point in WWII. They
led to the surrender of the Japanese and the victory to the Allies. The day that the Japanese
surrendered will forever be remembered. However, the destruction and casualties in both Hiroshima
and Nagasaki cannot be forgotten. Hiroshima and Nagasaki experienced massive destruction, and it
led to years of disease and misery for the Japanese people following the war. After WWII and the
creation of the atomic bomb, the world lived in fear of a nuclear attack ("The Atomic Bombings").
George Orwell's 1984 references to the atomic bomb and to the society and life after WWII.
Nevertheless, one must fully know and understand the bombings and the destruction ... Show more
People debate if the use of the atomic bomb was really necessary. Others claim that the bomb saved
lives on both American and Japanese sides. Either way, the use of the atomic bomb created threats
of a nuclear war. Orwell wrote 1984 shortly after WWII was over, and he used ideas from the
bombings in Japan in his book. Orwell's 1984 takes place in a post nuclear war society. The three
main superstates in 1984 possess an atomic bomb; however, they never dare to bomb each other
with them (Orwell 194). In our world, the atomic bomb showed advancement in technology. In
1984, the atomic bomb ended invention. However, in 1984, the government only advanced
technologically by creating more nuclear weapons. George Orwell made a society in which people
lived in misery and in fear due to the effects that happened after the bombings in Japan. Even though
Orwell's 1984 has a slight connection to the Japanese bombings, without those bombings, Orwell
would not have had the idea to write his book. It is crazy to believe that all history changed in a
blink of an eye because of the atomic bomb. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were fatal
and very destructive, but they have shaped history and have had a huge influence on writers' ideas
such as Orwell's ideas in

The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki
The horrific atom bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan on August 6th and 9th of 1945
brought about several reactions in the United States. Starting with the controversial events leading
up to the atomic with the Potsdam Proclamation, many Americans began to wonder whether the
total destruction of these two cities were necessary. However, immediate American responses and
reactions to the bombs were contrary to what they became later on. Americans slowly stopped being
ignorant of what had happened in Japan and began to question the actions of their government;
although, this questioning of such events was popular at first, they slowly accelerated to stronger
beliefs today. Finally, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 has had major effects
on America from the day of the bombing to present day United States On July 26, 1945, the United
States, Britain, and China, sent the Potsdam Proclamation to Japan. The Potsdam Proclamation was
an ultimatum that called for "the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces." The
Proclamation included several terms at which Japan would be given the chance to surrender the war
without a fight. The terms included an elimination of irresponsible militarism in the world and an
occupation by the Allies, Britain, China, or the US, in parts of Japan in order to secure these terms.
It also declared that the terms stated in the Proclamation must be followed in the Japanese islands of
Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, and Shikoku.

Introduction: Today, I would discuss am unimaginable event witnessed as the blast heated beneath
the ground at 5,000 degrees and contained the magnitude of 20,000 tons of TNT. This is the world's
first exposure to nuclear energy came with the detonation of two Japanese cities. By learning and
understanding enables us to create a better picture of the world. In doing research, Steve Sheiken, an
historical researcher concluded, "Of the 76,00 buildings that stood...70,000 were completely
destroyed in Hiroshima (Sheinkin, 204)." I am here only to inform the effects of the atomic
bombing, impacting Japanese lives. These attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki remains one of the
most infamous tragedies in history because of the large number of casualties that shattered Japan's
invincibility, leading to the Nuclear Era. Forecast: The focus of this speech is to provide knowledge
of Japanese casualties, invincibility and the evolution of the Nuclear Era. Body Paragraph #1:
Seventy–one years ago, Japanese destruction of cities by bombs caused a large number of casualties.
At 8:15 A.M on August 6, 1945, the United States released the atomic bomb. Sheinkin reported flash
of light followed immediately and "a mushroom cloud rose approximately 30,000 feet; vaporizing
anyone within 1,000 yards in its path (Sheinkin, )". The Shockwave destroyed even more lives. The
Japanese government stated, "About 70,000 people were dead already. Over 100,000 more would
die of wounds, burns, and radiation

Why Did Hiroshima Bombing Happen
What was the event?
The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was when United States dropped the world's first atomic
bombs onto Japan. Two atomic bombs were dropped onto two Japanese cities; Hiroshima and
Nagasaki.
Where did the event take place? Map?
The event or the bombing took place in Japan, in both Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The map of Japan showing the two cities that was bombed in World War 2
When? Dates?
On August 6, 1945, the world's first atomic bomb, named Little Boy was dropped onto Hiroshima.
Three days later on August 9, another more powerful atomic bomb was dropped onto the city of
Nagasaki.
Who was involved?
The nations that involved in the dropping of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the two nations, United
States and Japan. Japan was the victim of the two atomic bombs, and United States was the one that
used them to attack Japan.
Why did the event take place? (What led up to it?) ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Japan was one of the nations who started World War 2, and they killed an estimate of 10 million
people throughout the war. Victims included civilians, soldiers, women, children and babies. While
Germany surrendered to The Allies, Japan still continued their conquest. United States feared that
the Japanese will eventually conquer Asia and continue to kill hundred or thousands of civilians
each day. America first had the idea of an ground invasion of the main lands of Japan, but then they
realised that would not be threatening enough to force Japan to surrender. So instead, America
decided to drop an atomic bombs onto Japan, but they made two, so if one didn't force them to
surrender, two

Was Hiroshima Bombing Justified
The U.S. dropped two atomic bombs on Japan during World War II. The first bomb was dropped on
Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 and over 135,000 people died. Nagasaki was the second city bombed
on August 9, 1945 and at least 50,000 people died. Over 185,000 people died in total. Was the
bombing of Japan justified? This question has been on debate for some time between many people.
(Was the US justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second
World War? You debate, 2018, January 20) Some of the arguments justify the bombing of Japan.
One argument is that the U.S. was just trying to reduce the number of casualties. The United States
would have lost a lot of people trying to invade Japan because the Japanese soldiers were said to
fight to their last breath. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The U. S could have dropped the bombs on better places or places not so populated, but I believe it
is alright for them to drop the bombs. The bombings still got the job done, even if they could have
been more effective. It was justified because the U.S. was hoping for a quick victory to end the war.
My opinion on the debate is that the U.S. was justified in the bombing of Japan.
Sources
The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb: Arguments Against. (2017, August 03). Retrieved March 26,
2018, from https://www.historyonthenet.com/decision–use–atomic–bomb–arguments/
Shepherd, G. (2015, August 06). It's clear the US should not have bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Retrieved March 26, 2018, from https://qz.com/472146/its–clear–the–us–should–not–have–
bombed–hiroshima–and–nagasaki/
Was the US justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second
World War? You debate. (2018, January 20). Retrieved March 26, 2018, from

Atomic Bomb History
The first atomic bomb ever to be used in a military operation was
dropped on the City of Hiroshima. The second bomb exploded over Nagasaki. The
first bomb dropped on Hiroshima was made from uranium. The bomb dropped on
Nagasaki was made from plutonium. Little Boy was based on enriched uranium–
235 and Fat Man on plutonium–239. During world war ll, Hiroshima was a city of
considerable military importance. Hiroshima was the primary target of the first
U.S. nuclear attack mission. The city of Nagasaki however, was not the primary
target for the second atomic. Nagasaki was put on the target list in place of Kyoto.
The Aug. 6 bomb was name "little Boy" and the Aug. 9 bomb was name "fat
Man". More than 60,000 buildings were decimated.
The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By this fact alone, Americans to this day feel justified in their support for
the action of Truman and his war machine. However, Truman did not have any
serious discussions with the military about possible losses in a ground invasion, all
such calculations have been done since the events of August 1945." The bomb
was released to detonate at 1,900 ft. above ground for maximum effect, creating
a fireball that reached a diameter of 1,000 ft. and a temperature of more than
3,000 degrees Celsius, followed by a deafening boom and a blast wave". In a

matter of seconds, Hiroshima became silent to the rest of Japan. The Japanese
had no idea what had happened".
"They sent an aircraft to find out. The aircraft arrived and circled above the city.
The staff officer looked at the scarred land, the dark cloud above and the burning
city in disbelief. The aircraft landed and the rescue mission began. Many people
believe that this was the only way to get Emperor Hirohito of Japan to surrender
to the United States. Some believe that there were other reasons for dropping

Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and Science Fiction
Argumentative Synthesis Between Ryfle and Sontag Many differences can be seen between Steve
Ryfle's article "Godzilla's Footprint" and Susan Sontag's well known 1965 article "Imagination of
Disaster" as Ryfle talks about the Japanese's imagination perspective while Sontag talks about the
American imagination perspective of there view points on science fiction films. Furthermore, Ryfle
takes an intensive approach toward Godzilla has he provides evidence that advances his argument
with the help of Susan Napier's article "Panic Sites" where she demonstrated key points toward
Japanese science fiction films and relate to Ryfle's point of view. Whereas the famous Feminist write
of the 1950's and 60's, Sontag disagrees with Ryfle on his idea and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Many Japanese viewers went and watched the movie, leaving the theatre in tears due to the scenes
relating so vividly to the events that occurred. One such occurrence included the lucky dragon
incident, which involved a tuna trawler that trekked dangerously close to an H–bomb test site,
resulting in radiation poisoning to the crew members. Along with this imagery, a still illustration of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki in ashes after being hit by Godzilla symbolizes the attack of atomic bombs
by the Americans. This visual resembles how both cities looked after they had been attacked by the
atomic bombs. After the successful release of the film, Japanese critics accused the directors of
cashing in on national hysteria, and thus were not pleased. To support Ryfle's argument, Susan
Napier partially agrees with what Ryfle has to say in her article, "Panic Sites," by stating that "the
notion of disaster is of course not the only theme in Japanese science fiction" (Napier 330)–meaning
that the aesthetic concentration of disaster is not always praising the special effects but moreover
looking at the effects of disaster. Furthermore, she states, "The film offered its immediate post war
Japanese audience an experience that was both cathartic and compensatory, allowing them to rewrite
or at least to re–imagine their wartime experience" (Napier 330). They both conclude that certain
science fiction movies have intensive dramatics as well as something important to

The Atomic Bombings Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki
It has been seventy years since the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the end of the
Second World War in the Pacific Theatre. However, the unconditional surrender that was favored by
the Allies was only accepted by Japan after the Soviet Union entry into the "Greater East Asia War"
and the nuclear devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is a common myth in the Western world
that the nuclear bombs "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" caused Japan to surrender and in turn saved the
lives of thousands of American soldiers that were about to embark upon Operation Downfall, the
invasion of Japan. However, decades after the war the idea that the nuclear bombing of Japan was a
military necessity is not taken at face–value as it once was. Any historian who would explore the
situation in the Pacific theater will find that most of the actions taken by the warring nations during
the end were in reality very political in nature. This means that the atomic bombings of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki have a political necessity instead of a military one. This political necessity was which
nation would 'win' the surrender of the Japanese Empire. The United States of America and the
Soviet Union were racing each other for the surrender of Japan for different reasons. The Soviets
wanted to make sure that their prize promised to them at the Yalta Conference would be upheld. On
the other hand the Americans wanted to win Japan's surrender before the Soviets could launch an
invasion on Japanese home

The Unjustified Use Of Atomic Bombs On Japan

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Christy Davis

More from Christy Davis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Unjustified Use Of Atomic Bombs On Japan