The document discusses distributed mobility management (DMM) approaches for 5G networks. It summarizes several DMM techniques proposed in previous research, including client-based and network-based DMM, and hybrid DMM approaches. The document motivates DMM by noting increasing mobile data traffic and limitations of centralized mobility management, such as signaling overhead and scalability issues. DMM is presented as a more effective solution that provides user continuity, reliable handovers, and more cost-effective data forwarding compared to centralized approaches. The author proposes to analyze and evaluate different DMM techniques through simulation to identify the best solutions for 5G.

1. RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015
www.PosterPresentations.com
The review discusses all the techniques which have
been adopted and can be used in future proposed by
others. Moreover, the limitations in centralized
mobility management and how to overcome these
limitations have been thoroughly gone through.
Introduction
Aims and Objectives
Motivation
Mobile data traffic is increasing exponentially
Complex Core network
Reduce the Operator cost
Need of larger bandwidth.
Deployed Centralized networks
Use of IP protocol
Signaling overhead
Suboptimal routing
Scalability Problems
Reliability
Background
Methodology
•[1] Zuniga proposed two approaches client based
and network based for implementation of DMM.
• [1] He draws a conclusion that DMM is a right
solution as it is designed in a distributed and
feasibility manner right from the core.
•Moreover, we see that it is evolved from existing
3GPP and IETF mobility protocol.
[2] Develops Dynamic Mobile IP Anchoring
(DMIPA).
 Existing DMIPA is modified. DMIPA targets
heterogeneous and flat architectures.
[2] DMIPA guarantees reliability and seamless
handover between networks.
[3] Compared the recent centralized approach and
new DMM approach in terms of topology
dependency and routing cost. Proposed HDMM.
Results show that DMM is a better approach than
centralized mobility management in both cases i.e
total cost and topology dependency.
[3] HDMM proposed by them showed even more
better results and high performance.
Literature Review
SummaryDMM is more feasible.
More reliable and is fast.
Effective in terms of cost
Provides more effective data forwarding.
Provides better handover and hand off .
Provides User continuity
Most of the researches believe that DMM is
the best solution to the current increasingly
heavy traffic on internet.
My research work will comprise of
application of different techniques of DMM
in 5G and analyze and verify them through
simulation results.
References
[1] J. C. Zuniga, et al., "Distributed mobility management: A
standards landscape," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51,
pp. 80-87, 2013.
[2] J. Azevedo, et al., "Distributed IP mobility in a real
vehicular network," in 2015 IEEE International Conference on
Communication Workshop (ICCW), 2015, pp. 2419-2424.
[3] G. Chochlidakis and V. Friderikos, "Hybrid Distributed
Mobility Management for next-generation wireless networks," in
Network of the Future (NOF), 2014 International Conference and
Workshop on the, 2014, pp. 1-6.
[4] F. Giust, et al., "Analytic Evaluation and Experimental
Validation of a Network-Based IPv6 Distributed Mobility
Management Solution," IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing,
vol. 13, pp. 2484-2497, 2014.
Acknowledgment
I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Adnan
Kiani , for his constant and substantial support
during whole research. Dr. Adnan Kiani put all
his effort, attention and advice in completing
this research work.
Research Center for Modeling and Simulation, National University of Sciences and Technology, H-12 Campus, Islamabad,
Islamic Republic of Pakistan
 Samin Kainat– Dr. Adnan Kiani
 Distributed Mobility Management in 5G
Client based
DMM
Network Based
DMM
Fully
distributed
Partially
distributed
• The data and control planes are
separated
• Only the data plane is distributed.
• Here, the operations are similar to
3GPP networks
Routing based
DMM
Hybrid DMM
Distributed
Mobility
Management
[1]
3GPP, IETF
[2] DMIPA
[3] HDMM
[4] IPv6
[5] DF-PMIP,
DP-PMIP
[7] SoftNet,
Virtual LTE
[8]
PMIPv6,SDN,
routing based
[9] Ethernet
approach
clean-slate
approaches,
novel network
architecture
architecture-
dependent
solutions, such
as the different
efforts initiated
in the 3GPP,
peer-to-peer
approaches,
solutions based
on or extending
existing IETF
protocols.

2. RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015
www.PosterPresentations.com
Distributed
Mobility
Management
[3]
3GPP, IETF
[4] DMIPA
[5] HDMM
[6] IPv6
[7] DF-PMIP,
DP-PMIP
[8] SoftNet,
Virtual LTE
[9]
PMIPv6,SDN,
routing based
[10] Ethernet
approach

3. RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015
www.PosterPresentations.com