Rigino T. Macunay Jr.'s Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for the period of June 2015 to March 2016 was reviewed. The summary provides ratings for 4 Key Result Areas (KRA): Teaching-Learning Process (KRA 1), Pupils/Students Outcomes (KRA 2), School and Community Involvement (KRA 3), and Professional Growth & Development (KRA 4). Overall, Rigino received a rating of "Very Satisfactory" and earned a total of 85.75 points. His highest scores came from KRA 1 (Teaching-Learning Process) and KRA 2 (Pupils/Students Outcomes). The review forms provides assessments of

1. INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS
Name ofEmployee RIGINOT. MACUNAY,JR. Name ofRater DALIA P. RENOMERON
Position Teacher-I Position HeadTeacher -I
ReviewPeriod June 2015-March 2016 Date of Review April 2016
Bureau/Center/Service/Division DepEd,Leyte Division
Major
Final
Output
KRA OBJECTIVE/s TIMELINE
WEIGH
T PER
KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
ACTUAL
RESULT
RATING SCORE
KRA 1 I.Teaching-
LearningProcess 1. Prepared 135 complete set of
lessons plans throughout the rating
period.
2. Utilized Visuals / Printed IM’s and
other Manipulative instructional
materials that are appropriate to
the lesson’s objective
June - March
June - March
(35%)
5%
12%
5- Prepared 180 and above complete set
of lesson plans
4- Prepared 158 – 179 complete set of
lesson plans
3- Prepared 135 – 157 complete set of
lesson plans
2- Prepared 114 – 134 complete set of
lesson plans
1- Prepared 113 – and below complete
set of lesson plans
5- Utilized 5 varied instructional materials
4- Utilized 4 varied instructional materials
3- Utilized 3 varied instructional materials
2- Utilized 2 varied instructional materials
1- Utilized 1 varied instructional material
5 x.05
5x.12
0.250
o.600

2. 3. a. (For classroom advisers)
Established and maintained a
classhome that is conducive for
learning throughout the year with
at least 75% of the Division
Standard Classroom Evaluation
Checklist achieved.
(Refer to the Division Standard
Classroom Evaluation Checklist for
Elem. And Sec.)
3. b. ( For special subject teachers)
Prepared an updated board structuring
and others required of the subject /
assignment with 75% accomplishment.
(Refer to monitoring checklist.)
4. Taught all competencies in the
Budget of Lesson in all subject areas
with 75% mastery
June - March
9%
5%
5- Met 96 – 100% of the items on the
Division Standard Classroom evaluation
checklist
4- Met 86 -95% of the items on the
Division Standard Classroom evaluation
checklist
3- Met 75- 85% of the items on the
Division Standard Classroom evaluation
checklist
2- Met 50 – 74% of the items on the
Division Standard Classroom evaluation
checklist
1- Met only 49% of the items on the
Division Standard Classroom evaluation
checklist
5- Accomplished 100% of the items
4-Accomplished 86 – 99% of the items
3-Accomplished 75 – 85% of the items
2-Accomplished 50 – 74% of the items
1- Accomplished only 49% and below
5- 95% and above of competencies were
taught with at least 75% mastery
4 – 85 – 94% of competencies were taught
with at least 75% mastery
3- 75- 84% of competencies were taught
with at least 75% mastery
2- 65 – 74% of competencies were taught
with at least 75% mastery
1- 64% and below of competencies were
4 x.09
4 x.05
0.360
0.200

3. KRA 2
Pupils/
StudentsOutcomes
5. Constructed / Updated 80 complete
indexed IM’s / e IM’s ( 10 per subject
area assigned).
1. Attained an average MPS of 75% in
the NAT
2. Attained 0 drop-out rate in all
classes handled
3. Zero-out non-readers ( for Grades 1
to 10)
(Based on EGRA/ PHIL-IRI result)
4. Zero-out non-numerates (based on
June - March
June - March
June - March
June - March
June - March
4%
30%
5%
3%
3%
3%
taught with at least 75% mastery
5- 100 or more completed indexed
IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or
updated
4- 90 – 99 completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s
were constructed or updated
3- 80-89 completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s
were constructed or updated
2- 70-79 completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s
were constructed or updated
1 – 69 and below completed indexed
IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or
updated
5- attained 75% and above MPS
4- attained 70 -74% MPS
3- attained 65- 69 MPS
2- attained 60 -64% MPS
1- attained 59% and above MPS
5- 0 drop-out rate
4- 0.1 – 1.0 %drop-out rate
3- 1.1 – 2.0% drop-out rate
2- 2.1 – 3.0% drop-out rate
1- above 3.0 % drop- out rate
5- 0 non-reader
4- non- reader is only 1-2% of the class
3-non-reader is only 3-4% of the class
2- non-reader is only 5-6% of the class
1- non-reader is 7% and above of the class
5 - 0 non- numerates
3 X.04
5X.05
4 X.03
5X.03
5X.03
0.120
1.53
0.250
0.120
0.150
0.150

4. EGMA and other tests)
5. Increased the number of readers
from non-reader to frustration level;
from frustration to instructional
/independent level in all classes
handled
(Note: Non-advisers will take the
reading performance of the classes
handled)
6. Zero-out failure rate in all classes
handled
7. a. Updated school records (for
teachers with advisory class)
 SF 1
June – March
June – March
June – March
3%
4%
3%
4 – non numerates is only 1-2% of the
class
3 – non-numerates is only 3-4% of the
class
2- non-numerates is only 5-6% of the class
1- non-numerates is 7% and above of the
class
5-increased 5 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
4- increased 4 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
3- increased 3 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
2- increased 2 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
1- increased 1 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
5- 0 failure rate
4- average of 1-2 % failure rate
3- average of 3-4 % failure rate
2- average of 5-6 % failure rate
1- average of 7% and above failure rate
5-all School Records listed below are
updated
 Class Records/Grade Sheets
5 X.03
5X.04
4 X.03
0.150
0.200
0.120

5.  SF2
 SF3
 SF 4
 SF 5
 LIS Portal
 Class Records
 Form 138
 Form 137
 Grade Sheets
 Summative Test Questions with
TOS
 SReYA
 ECCD checklist / card
7 . b. Updated school records ( for
special subject teachers )
8. Prepared and submitted anyof the
following reports as required
 Quarterly Periodic Exam Results
(MPS)
 Oral Reading Test Results (PHIL-
IRI Oral and Silent, EGRA, MTB-
MLE, Numeracy Test)
June – March 3%
reflected the bases of students’
rating in all classes/subject areas
handled
 LIS was updated o or before the
deadline
 Updated SF 2 every month
 Updated Monthly
 Updated SF 1 and SF3 three weeks
after the opening of classes
 Updated From 138 and 137 every
quarter
 Updated Form 138,137, 9 and SF 5
t the end of the school year
 Four Quarterly tests with complete
Table of Specifications
4- lacks 1 school record
3- lacks 2 school records
2- lacks 3 school records
1- lacks 4 school records
5 – all School Records updated and /or
submitted
4- lacks 1 school record
3- lacks 2 school records
2- lacks 3 school records
1- lacks 4 school records
5- Prepared and submitted all reports 2
days earlier than the deadline
4- Prepared and submitted all reports 1
day earlier than the deadline
3- Prepared and submitted all reports on
the deadline
4 X.03 0.12

6. KRA 3
III.Schooland
Community Involvement
 Form 48
 Action Plan/ CIP
 Monthly Accomplishment
Report
 ECCD: Pre/Mid/Post Test
 SReYA Result
 Pre-Test /Post –Test
 Nutritional Status Report
 PFSTT
 GAD Report
 Others (pls. specify)
 Guidance Action Plan
 Students Ranklist
 Others
9. Conducted counselling sessions
with supporting evidences.
1. Conducted at least 4 PTA
meetings with the following
MOV’s:
 Agenda
 Attendance Sheets
June – March
June – March
2%
10%
3%
2- Prepared and submitted all reports 1
day after the deadline
1- prepared and submitted all reports 2
days or more after the deadline
5- Conducted counsellingsessions 5
times or more per month
4- Conducted counsellingsessions 4
times per month
3- Conducted counselling sessions 3
times per month
2- Conducted counsellingsessions twice
per month
1- Conducted counsellingsession once
per month
5- conducted 5 or more PTA meetings
with complete MOVs
4- conducted 4 PTA meetings with
complete MOVs
3- conducted 3 PTA meetings with MOVs
4X.02
5X.03
0.08
1.340
0.150

7.  Minutes of the Meetings
 Others (pls. specify)
2. Attended School / District Meetings
3. Initiated the conduct of BRIGADA
ESKWELA activities
3. Participated in at least three civic-
oriented activities
June – March
Year round
June – May
2%
3%
2%
2- conducted 2PTAmeetings with MOVs
1- conducted 1 PTA meeting withMOVs
5 – 95 – 100% attendance in school
/district meetings on time
4- 85 – 94% attendance in school/district
meetings on time
3 – 75 -84% attendance in school/district
meetings on time
2 – 55 – 74% attendance in school/district
meetings on time
1 – 1-54% attendance in school/district
meetings on time
5- conducted four (4) BRIGADA ESKWELA
activities with complete
documentation
4- conducted three (3) BRIGADAESKWELA
activities with complete
documentation
3- conducted two(2) BRIGADA ESKWELA
activities with complete
documentation
2- conducted one (1) BRIGADA ESKWELA
activity with complete documentation
1- conducted BRIGADA
activity with no documentation
5-participated 5 or more civic-oriented
activities with MOVs (pictures,
certificate)
4- participated 4 civic-oriented activities
with MOVs (pictures, certificate)
3- participated 3 civic-oriented activities
5X.02
5X.03
3X.02
0.100
0.150
0.060

8. KRA 4
Professional Growth
&Development
Plus Factor
A. – Winning Coach
/Awardee
- Resource Speaker /
Trainer
1. Attended In-service trainings of
at least 3 days conducted by DepEd
2.Earned units or Degree in post
Graduate Studies
20%
10%
10%
5%
with MOVs (pictures, certificate)
2- participated 2 civic-oriented activity
with MOVs (pictures, certificate)
1- participated only 1 civic-oriented
activity with MOVs (pictures,
certificate)
5-International /National Level
4-Regional Level
3-Division Level
2-District Level
1-School Based
5- Doctoral degree holder
4- earned units in Doctoral degree
3-Masteral Degree
2-CAR in Masteral Degree
1-units in Masteral Degree
5- International Level
4- National Level
3- Regional Level
2- Division Level
1- School / District Level
3 X.10
1 X.10
1
0.460
0.300
0.100
0.400

9. - Facilatator
- Curriculum writer
B. 100% Daily
Attendance
C. Action Research
D. Chairmanship
5- Perfect attendance
4- 1 to 2 absences
3- 3 to 5 absences
2- 6 to 8 absences
1- 9 or more absences
5- Action Research Replicated by other
schools
4- Implemented the Action Research by
the SDS / ASDS
3- Approved Action Research by the
SDS/ASDS
2- Submitted ActionResearch Proposal
to the SDS/ASDS
1- Proposed Action Research to the
Immediate Supervisor
5- 3 or more chairmanship school level
4- 2 chairmanship school level
3- 1 chairmanship or 4 or more
membership school level
2- active member in 3 or more comm.
School level
1- active member in 1-2
comm.School level
Overall Rating for Accomplishments
5
0
5
1+4+0+5=
11/4=2.75
85.75
0.138
3.868

10. SUMMARY OF POINTS EARNED
LEGEND:
QUANTITATIVE RATING QUALITATIVE RATING
KRA 1 21 1.530
KRA2 40 1.340
4.5-5.0 90-100% OUTSTANDING KRA3 18 0.460
3.5-4.49 70-89% VERY SATISFACTORY KRA4 4 0.400
PLUS FACTOR 2.75 0.138
2.5-3.49 50-69% SATISFACTORY
1.5-2.49 30-49% UNSATISFACTORY TOTAL 85.75 3.868
BELOW - 1.49 29% AND BELOW
POOR DESCRIPTIVE RATING VERY SATISFACTORY
DALIA P.RENOMERON RIGINO T.MACUNAY, JR.
Rater Ratee
Approved:
TERESITA M. ANTOLIN
Principal I

11. FINAL COPYOF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MG
TEACHERS
Name of Employee EVELIZAP. MADRAZO Name ofRater ERNEL S. MERANO
Position T-I Position TEACHER-IN CHARGE
ReviewPeriod S.Y. 2015-2016 Date of Review APRIL 2016
Bureau/Center/Service/Division DEPED/LEYTE DIVISION
Major
Final
Output
KRA OBJECTIVE/s TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
ACTUAL
RESULT
RATING SCORE

12. KRA 1
Teaching-
Learning
Process
3. Prepared 216 complete lesson plans
throughout the rating period.
(8 lesson plans/week/grade level)
4. Taught 100% of the competencies
in the Budget of Lesson in all
subject areas with 75% average
MPS of the Quarterly Test.
3. Effectively utilized instructional
teaching
strategies/techniques/approache
s that are appropriate tothe
lessons’ objective
 ICT/Multimedia Teaching
June - March
June - March
June - March
(35%)
5%
5%
5%
5- Prepared 288 above teaching
plans for the school year
4- Prepared 252-287 teaching
Plan for the school year
3- Prepared 216-251 teaching
plans for the school year
2- Prepared 180-215 teaching plans
for the school year
1- Prepared 179 and below teaching
plans for the school year
MOV: Weekly Lesson Plan
Checklist
5- 80% and above of pupils were
able to get 75% MPS in the class
4- 75-79% of pupils were able to get
75% MPS in the class
3- 70-74% of pupils were able to get
75% MPS in the class
2- 29-56% of pupils were able to get
75% MPS in the class
1- 28% and below of pupils were
able to get 75% MPS in the class
MOV:Quarterly Test Result
5- effectively utilized appropriate
strategies as evident in 96-100%
from the School Head’s
observation of the teacher
4- effectively utilized appropriate
strategies as evident in 86-95%
from the School Head’s

13.  Cooperative learning
 Individualized Instruction
 Differentiated Learning
 Contextual Learning
 Thematic Teaching Approach
 Others (pls. Specify)
4. Established and maintained a class
home that is conducive for
learning throughout the year with
at least 75% of the Division
Standard Class home Evaluation
Checklist.
(For Grade 1-6 teachers refer to the
Division Standard class home evaluation
checklist for Elem. and Sec.)
(For Kindergarten Teachers refer to
Kindergarten Monitoring Tools)
June - March 5%
observation of the teacher
3- effectively utilized appropriate
strategies as evident in 75-85%
from the School Head’s
observation of the teacher
2- effectively utilized appropriate
strategies as evident in 50-74%
from the School Head’s
observation of the teacher
1-effectively utilized appropriate
strategies as evident in 49% and
below from the School Head’s
observation of the teacher
MOV: School Head/Master
Teacher’s Observation of the
Teacher
5-Met 96-100% of the items on the
Division Standard Class home
evaluation checklist
4- Met 86-95% of the items on the
Division Standard Class home
evaluation checklist
3- Met 75-85% of the items on the
Division Standard Class home
evaluation checklist
2- Met 50-74% of the items on the
Division Standard Class home
evaluation checklist
1- Met only 49% and below of the
items on the Division Standard
Classhome evaluation checklist
MOV: Division Standard Class Home

14. 5.1 Utilized Visuals/Printed IMs and
other Manipulative instructional
materials that are appropriate to
the lesson’s objective. (for Grade
2-6 teachers only)
Charts
Pictures
Ppt presentations
Audio/Video clips
Realia
5.2 Implemented Project TIED
throughout
the lessons.
(for Grade 1 teachers only)
LCD Projector/ White
Screen/LED
Laptop/netbook/tablet
Lesson Plan with TIED
June - March
June - March
5%
5%
Evaluation Checklist
5- ICT/Multimedia, Audio, Visual
and Printed and Manipulative
instructional materials were
utilized throughout the
lessons.
4- Audio, Visual, Printed and
Manipulative instructional
materials were utilized
throughout the lessons.
3- Visual, Printed and other
Manipulative instructional
materials were utilized
throughout the lessons.
2- Printed materials were
utilized
throughout the lessons.
1- Innovative instructional
materials were not utilized
throughout the lessons.
MOV: Indexed IMs Checklist
5- Implemented Project TIED with
the utilization of more than 4
ICTs throughout the lessons.
4- Implemented Project TIED with
the utilization of 4 ICT
throughout the lessons.
3- Implemented Project TIED with
the utilization of 3 ICTs
throughout the lessons.
2- Implemented Project TIED with

15. Integration (saved in flashdrive)
Printer
6. Constructed 80 complete indexed
IMs/ eIMs (10 per subject area).
 To be adjusted yearly.
7. Conducted daily RRE in all learning
areas based on the CPL
June - March
June - March
5%
5%
the utilization of 2 ICT
throughout the lesson.
1- Implemented Project TIED with
the utilization of the only 1 ICT
throughout the lessons.
5- 100 or more complete indexed
IMs/ eIMs were prepared
4- 90-99complete indexed IMs/
eIMs were prepared
3- 80-89 complete indexed IMs/
eIMs were prepared
2- 70-79complete indexed IMs/
eIMs were prepared
1- 69 and below complete indexed
IMs/ eIMs were prepared
MOV: Indexed IMs Checklist
5-conducted daily RRE episodes and
attained at least 96-100%
proficiency level
4-conducted daily RRE episodes and
attained at least 86%-95%
proficiency level
3- conducted dailyRRE episodes and
attained at least 75%-85%
proficiency level
2- conducted daily RRE episodes
and attained at least 50%-74%
proficiency level
2- conducted daily RRE episodes and
attained at least 49% and below
proficiency level

16. Sub-total
KRA 2
Pupils/
Students
Outcomes
1. Attained an average MPS of
75% in the following:
 NAT
2. Attained 0 drop-out rate in all
classes handled
3.1 Zeroed-out non-readers
(# of NR/ monthly enrolment) for
Grade 1 teachers only
June - March
June - March
June -
March
35%
6%
5%
8%
MOV: CPL
5-attained 75% MPS and above
4-attained 66-74% MPS
3-attained 57-65% MPS
2-attained 29-56% MPS
1-attained 0-28% MPS
MOV: NAT Result
5- 0 drop-out rate
4- 0.1-1.0% drop-out rate
3- 1.1-2.0% drop-out rate
2- 2.1-3.0% drop-out rate
1- above 3.0% drop-out rate
5-0 non-reader
4-non-reader is only 0.1-1.0% of the
class
3-non-reader is only 1.1-2.0% of the
class
2-non-reader is only 2.1-3.0% of the
class
1-non-reader is above 3.0% of the
class

17. 3.1.1 Increased the number of
readers from frustration
level to
instructional/independe
nt level in all classes
handled
(Note: Non-advisers will take the reading
performance of the classes handled) (for Grade 2-6
teachers only)
4. Zeroed-out non-numerates
( # of NN/ monthly enrolment)
 Unified District tool
5. Zeroed- out failure rate
June - March
June - March
June - March
(8%)
4%
3%
5- increased 5 readers from current
reading level to the next higher
reading level
4- increased 4 readers from current
reading level to the next higher
reading level
3-increased 3 readers from current
reading level to the next higher
reading level
2- increased 2 readers from current
reading level to the next higher
reading level
1- increased 1 reader from current
reading level to the next higher
reading level
MOV: Phil-IRI
5- 0 non-numerate
4- non-numerate is only 0.1-1.0% of
the class
3- non-numerate is only 1.1-2.0% of
the class
2- non-numerate is only 2.1-3.0% of
the class
1- non-numerate is above 3.0% of
the class
MOV: Numeracy Test
5- 0% failure rate
4- failure is only 1% of the class
3- failure is only 2% of the class
2- failure is only 3% of the class
1- failure is 4% and above of the

18. 6. Updated school records
 SF1
 SF2
 SF3
 SF5
 LIS Portal
 Class Records
 Form 138
 Form 137
 Grade Sheets
 Summative Test Questions
with TOS
7. Prepared and submitted the
following reports as required
June - March
June - March
3%
3%
class
MOV: LIS Forms
5 - all School Records listed below
are updated:
 Class Records/ Grade Sheets
reflected the bases of
students’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled
 LIS was updated on or before
the deadline
 Updated SF2 every month
 Updated SF1 and SF3 three
weeks after the opening of
classes
 Updated Form 138 and 137
every quarter
 Updated Form 138, 137, 9 and
SF5 at the end of the school
year
 Four Quarterly tests with
complete Table of
Specifications
4- lacks 1 school record
3- lacks 2 school records
2- lacks 3 school records
1- lacks 4 school records
MOV: School Record Checklist
5- Prepared and submitted all
reports 2 days earlier than the
deadline
4- Prepared and submittedall

19.  Quarterly Periodic Exam Results
(MPS)
 Oral Reading Test Results (PHIL
IRI Oral & Silent, EGRA, MTB-
MLE)
 Numeracy Test Result
 Form 48
 Monthly Accomplishment
Report
 Pre-test/Post test
 Nutritional Status Report
 PPFT (Grade 4-6)
 Others (pls. specify)
8. Conducted counselling
sessions to at least 3 pupils/
students with supporting
evidences.
June - March 3%
reports 1 day before the deadline
3. Prepared and submitted all
reports on the deadline
2- Prepared and submittedall
reports 1 day after than the
deadline
1- Prepared and submittedall
reports 2 days and more after the
deadline.
MOV: File copy of Reports
Submitted
5- Conducted 5 counselling sessions
with supporting evidences
4- Conducted 4 counselling sessions
with supporting evidences
3- Conducted 3 counselling sessions
with supporting evidences
2- Conducted 2 counselling sessions
with supporting evidences
1- Conducted 1 counselling session
with supporting evidences
MOV: Pictures, Anecdotal Records,
Counselling Forms

20. Sub-total
KRA 3
Schooland
Community
Involvement
2. Conducted at least 4 PTA
meetings
2. Initiated the conduct of at least 2
BRIGADA activities year-round
June - March
Year Round
10%
4%
2%
5- conducted 6 or more PTA
meetings with complete MOVs
4- conducted 5 PTA meetings with
complete MOVs
3- conducted 4 PTA meetings with
MOVs
2- conducted 3 PTA meetings with
MOVs
1- conducted 2 PTA meeting with
MOVs
MOV: Attendance Sheets, Minutes
of the Meetings, Picture
5- conducted four (4) BRIGADA
activities with complete
documentation
4- conducted three (3) BRIGADA
activities with complete
documentation
3- conducted two(2) BRIGADA
activities with complete
documentation
2- conducted one (1) BRIGADA
activity with complete
documentation
1- conducted BRIGADA
activity with no documentation

21. Sub-total
KRA 4
3. Participated in at least three civic-
oriented activities
1. Attended In-service trainings of
at least 3 days within a year
conducted by DepEd
2.Earned degree or units in Graduate
June- May
Year Round
Year Round
4%
15%
5%
10%
MOVs: Attendance Sheet, Pictures,
Narrative Report
5-participated 5 or more civic-
oriented activities with MOVs
(pictures, certificate)
4- participated 4 civic-oriented
activities with MOVs (pictures,
certificate)
3- participated 3 civic-oriented
activities with MOVs (pictures,
certificate)
2- participated 2 civic-oriented
activity with MOVs (pictures,
certificate)
1- participated only 1 civic-oriented
activity with MOVs (pictures,
certificate)
5-International /National Level
4-Regional Level
3-Division Level
2-District Level
1-School Based
5- Doctoral degree holder
4.5 Earned Complete Academic
Requirements in Ph.D./Ed.D.

22. Sub-total
Professional Growth
&Development
Plus Factor
Studies
 Winning Coach/ Awardee
 Resource Speaker/ Trainer
 Chairmanship
 Facilitator
 100% daily attendance andother
school related activities
 Participated in academic and
non-academic competitions
like
- MTAP
June - March
June- March
June- March
5%
4- Master’s degree holder
3.5- Earned 36 units in MA/CAR
3-Earned 27 units in MA
2-Earned 18 units in MA
1-Earned 9 units and below in Post
Graduate study.
0- No Units in MA
5- International/ National Level
4- Regional Level
3- Division Level
2- Area Level
1- District Level
MOV: Pictures, Certificates
5- Perfect attendance
4- 1 to 2 absences
3- 3 to 5 absences
2- 6 to 8 absences
1- 9 or more absences
MOV: Teacher’sAttendance
5- International/National
participation
4- Regional participation

23. ERNEL S. MERANO EVELIZA P. MADRAZO
Rater Ratee
Sub-total
- Scouting
- DAMATH
- Journalism,
Congressional &,
Provincial Meets
- Curriculum Writer
-
 Conducted Action Research
- ers (pls. Specify
3- Division participation
2- Area/District participation
1- School participation
MOV: Certificate of Participation
5- Accomplished an Action
Research with MOVs
4- Implementation of an Action
Research with MOVs
3- Approved Action Research by
the SDS/ASDS
2- Submitted ActionResearch
Proposal to the SDS/ASDS
1- Proposed Action Research to the
Immediate Supervisor
OVERALL RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENT

24. SUMMARY OF POINTS EARNED
LEGEND:
QUANTITATIVE RATING QUALITATIVE RATING
KRA 1
KRA2
4.5-5.0 90-100% OUTSTANDING KRA3
3.5-4.49 70-89% VERY SATISFACTORY KRA4
2.5-3.49 50-69% SATISFACTORY PLUS FACTOR
1.5-2.49 30-49% UNSATISFACTORY TOTAL
BELOW - 1.49 29% AND BELOW
POOR DESCRIPTIVE RATING

25. Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education (DepEd)
Region VIII (Eastern Visayas)
DIVISION OF LEYTE
District of Inopacan
DELOS SANTOS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
For Teachers
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
COMMITMENT
& REVIEW (IPCR)