This document contains an individual performance commitment and review form for a secondary school teacher named Hazrat Olayinka Kayode Mico Ameen. It lists the teacher's objectives for the review period of June 2014 to March 2015 across key result areas like teaching-learning process, student outcomes, community involvement, and professional growth. It provides performance indicators and targets to rate the teacher's accomplishment of each objective. The form is to be filled out by the teacher's rater, Principal Rolito Mendeja Inojosa, to evaluate the teacher's performance during the review period.

1. Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form .
Name of Employee: HAZRAT OLAYINKA KAYODE MICO AMEEN Name of Rater: ROLITO MENDEJA INOJOSA, Ph. D.
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED LUCENA CITY
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING SCORE
1. TEACHING- LEARNING PROCESS
1. Prepare an updated lesson plan in my handled subject; 161 mathematics lesson intended for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 200 for SPED (ID); 40 Mathematics Lesson Plans for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP within the current school year focusing on the competencies intended for each level.
2. Monitor my learners’ attendance; 161 days intended for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 200 days for SPED (ID); 40 days for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP to ensure learners presence during the time of my subject throughout the current school year.
3. Execute a total of 3 approved remediation program from 2nd to 4th quarter to address mathematics learning gaps to 100% of the learners who got a Beginning level from the previous quarter of the current school year.
JUNE 2014 – MARCH 2015
JUNE 2014 – MARCH 2015
AUGUST 2014 – MARCH 2015
35%
5 – Prepared 209.3 and above lesson plans intended for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 260 and above lesson plans for SPED ID; 52 and above lesson plan for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
4 – Prepared 185.15 – 209.29 lesson plans intended for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 230-259.99 lesson plans for SPED ID; 46-51.99 lesson plan for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
3 – Prepared 161-185.14 lesson plans intended for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 200-229 lesson plans for SPED ID; 40-45.9 lesson plan for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
2 – Prepared 80.6-160 lesson plans intended for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 101-199 lesson plans for SPED ID; 20.4-39.9 lesson plan for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
1 – Prepared 0 – 80.5 lesson plans intended for Lirio, Waling- waling and Kalachuchi; 0 – 100 lesson plans for SPED ID; 0 – 20 lesson plan for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
5 – Monitored 209.3 days and above intended for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 260 days and above for SPED ID; 52 days and above for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
4 – Monitored 185.15 – 207.69 day for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 230-258 days for SPED ID; 46-51.6 days for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
3 – Monitored 161-183.54 days for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 200-228 days for SPED ID; 40-45.6 days for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
2 – Monitored 82.11-159.39 days for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 102-198 days for SPED ID; 20.4-39.6 days for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
1 – Monitored 0 – 80.5 days for Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 0 – 100 days for SPED ID; 0 – 20 days for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
5 – Executed 3.9 or more remediation program throughout the year.
4 – Executed 3.45-3.89 remediation programs throughout the year.
3 – Executed 3.0-3.44 remediation programs throughout the year.
2 – Executed 1.51-2.99 remediation programs throughout the year.
1 – Executed 0-1.5 remediation program throughout the year.

2. Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form .
Name of Employee: HAZRAT OLAYINKA KAYODE MICO AMEEN Name of Rater: ROLITO MENDEJA INOJOSA, Ph. D.
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED LUCENA CITY
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING SCORE
2. STUDENT OUTCOMES
3. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
4. Attain a 100% passing rate for my students making them acquire a final rating between 75% and 80% in my subject at the end of the current school year.
5. Help the school lessen the drop-out rate by 2% within the school year by encouraging the regular 4th year advisers transfer their SARDO’s to OHSP.
6. Train/Coach 2 contestant of any contest to represent the school in the division level within the current school year.
7. Create a 100% profile of OHSP enrolees on the Beginning of the School Year (BoSY) from Grade 7 to 4th year of the current school year.
MARCH 2015
JUNE 2014 – MARCH 2015
JUNE 2014 – MARCH 2015
JUNE 2014 – MARCH 2015
JUNE
35%
20%
5 – 130% and above of my students attain either developing, approaching proficiency, proficient or advance level on their final rating.
4 – 115-129% of my students attain either developing, approaching proficiency, proficient or advance level on their final rating.
3 – 100-114% of my students attain developing proficiency level on their final rating.
2 – 51-99% of my students attain developing proficiency level on their final rating.
1 – 0-50% of my students attains developing proficiency level on their final rating.
5 – The school dropout rate change by 2.6% and above from the past school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
4 – The school dropout rate change by 2.3-2.59% from the past school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
3 – The school dropout rate change by 2.0-2.29% from the past school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
2 – The school dropout rate change by 1.02-1.99% from the past school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
1 – The school dropout rate change by 0-1.0% from the past school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
5 – Coach/train 2.6 or more contestants to represent the school any contest in the division level within the current school year.
4 – Coach/train 2.3-2.59 contestants to represent the school any contest in the division level within the current school year.
3 – Coach/train 2.0-2.29 contestant to represent the school any contest in the division level within the current school year.
2 – Coach/train 1.01-1.99 contestant to represent the school any contest in the division level within the current school year.
1 – Coach/train 0-1.0 contestant to represent the school any contest in the division level within the current school year.
5 – Created only 130% and above profile for OHSP learners enrolees within the current school year.
4 – Created only 115 – 129% profile for OHSP learners’ enrolees within the current school year.
3 – Created only 100 – 114% profile for OHSP learners’ enrolees within the current school year.
2 – Created only 51 – 99% profile for OHSP learners BoSY enrolees within the current school year.
1 – Created only 0 – 50% profile for OHSP learners BoSY enrolees within the current school year.
5 – Conducted a total of 2.6 and above parent meeting / conference within the current school year.

3. Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form .
Name of Employee: HAZRAT OLAYINKA KAYODE MICO AMEEN Name of Rater: ROLITO MENDEJA INOJOSA, Ph. D.
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED LUCENA CITY
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING SCORE
4. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT
8. Conduct 1 regular parent-meetings / conference semi-annually to give report on the performance of their learners within the current school year
9. Invites 50% of learners’ parent/guardian in my class advisorship (OHSP) needing academic monitoring/follow-up due to 2 absenteeism per month.
10. Conducts 2 approved school- based instructional supports for the K to 12 Curriculum to be shared to my fellow teachers on the current school year through a faculty development session.
2014 – MARCH 2015
JUNE 2014 – MARCH 2015
JUNE 2014 – MARCH 2015
10%
4 – Conducted a total of 2.3-2.59 parent meeting / conference within the current school year.
3 – Conducted a total of 2.0-2.29 parent meeting / conference within the current school year.
2 – Conducted a total of 1.01-1.99 parent meeting / conference within the current school year.
1 – Conducted a total of 0-1 parent meeting / conference within the current school year.
5 – Invited 65% and above of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to school within the current school year.
4 – Invited 57.5-64.99% of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to school within the current school year.
3 – Invited 50-57% of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to school within the current school year.
2 – Invited 25.01-49.99% of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to school within the current school year.
1 – Invited 0-25% of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to school within the current school year.
5 – Conducted 2.6 approved school-based instructional supports for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
4 – Conducted 2.3-2.59 approved school-based instructional supports for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
3 – Conducted 2.0-2.29 approved school-based instructional supports for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
2 – Conducted 1.01-1.99 approved school-based instructional supports for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
1 – Conducted 0-1.0 approved school-based instructional supports for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ROLITO M. INOJOSA, Ph. D.
HAZRAT OLAYINKA KAYODE M. AMEEN
Rater
Ratee
DEPED RPMS FORM – TEACHERS | 3