A new approximation for the full waveform inversion (FWI) that does not require any forward modeling to estimate the gradient, making the routine cheaper, faster and with competitive resolution. It also opens the possibility for a post-stack approximation.
Project presented at the GeoConvention 2017 in Calgary, AB, Canada:
http://www.geoconvention.com/uploads/2017abstracts/039_GC2017_FWI_without_tears.pdf
19. Gradient Approximation: Impedance Inversion
www.crewes.org
• Gradient -> reflection coefficients or impedance?
• Impedance inversion
• FWI as processing tools
• I – impedance inversion
• S – stacking
• M – migration
20. Gradient Approximation: Impedance Inversion
www.crewes.org
• Pratt et al. (1990):
• Step length:
Forward modeling over a small
perturbation of the model
26. Gradient Approximation: Forward Modeling-Free (Pre-Stack)
www.crewes.org
• Linear operators
Current Model
And:
Step length requires 2 forward modeling
No forward modeling is required
to estimate the gradient
Separate the terms
32. Gradient Approximation: Forward Modeling-Free (Post-Stack)
www.crewes.org
• Seismic processing workflow
• Commute the order of the Migration and Stacking processes
33. Gradient Approximation: Forward Modeling-Free (Post-Stack)
www.crewes.org
• Seismic processing workflow
• Commute the order of the Migration and Stacking processes
34. Gradient Approximation: Forward Modeling-Free (Post-Stack)
www.crewes.org
• Seismic processing workflow
• Commute the order of the Migration and Stacking processes
Theoretically, same thing
Pre-stack migration
Post-stack migration
55. Conclusions
www.crewes.org
• Impedance inversion of the gradient is reasonable
• Forward modeling-free gradient is good enough and stable
• No source estimation for gradient
• Two forward modeling runs is required to estimate step length
• Possibility for a post-stack approximation
• Trace integration has higher resolution on simpler models
• Requires reasonable good initial model
• Promising results