2. Q1. WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
This question has allowed me to find
out who gave the feedback about our
documentary and who in our target
audience gave more answers.
Through looking at the results to
this question I have learned that the
majority of people giving feedback
about our documentary were female,
which means that the results may be
slightly biased toward the interests
of females.
3. Q2. WHAT IS YOUR AGE RANGE?
Just like the previous question this
question has allowed me to gain
understanding of who gave feedback
for our documentary and what age
range within the target audience we
had the most responses from. The
results showed me that we got
responses from all the age ranges
within our target audience which is
good as the response we varied
across all ages. However the
majority of respondents were
between the ages of 16-20 which
will have an impact on the
responses.
4. Q3. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL
AND 5 BEING VERY ENTERTAINING) HOW
ENTERTAINING DID YOU FIND THE
DOCUMENTARY?
This question has allowed me to find
out if people within our target
audience have found the
documentary entertaining and
enjoyed watching it. The majority of
people gave the documentary a 4 or
5 on how entertaining they thought
the
documentary was which shows that
they have enjoyed watching it. However
there were a few people that gave it a 3
and one person that gave it a 1 which
could be due to the lack of interest in
the topic of our documentary.
5. Q4. WHY?
The answers to this question has
allowed me to learn as to why
people have rated the documentary
the way they have. The responses
show that there were two people
that have answered the
questionnaire that don’t really like
pets which explains the lover
ratings. However the majority of
people have found the
documentary entertaining and the
most people said that they have
enjoyed watching the documentary
have found the different pets to be
interesting.
6. Q5. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL
AN 5 BEING VERY INFORMATIVE) HOW
INFORMATIVE DID YOU FIND THE
DOCUMENTARY?
The results from this question has
allowed me to gain an understanding
on how informative they thought the
documentary was. The majority of
people have found the documentary
very informative as they gave it a
score of 5 out of 5. Which meant that
they could have learned something
from it. However there was one
person that have it a score of 2 which
could be due to the fact that the
person already has a wide knowledge
of pets.
7. Q6. WHY?
These are the responses giving
explanations to the scores given on
how informative the documentary is.
Some people said that they found it
informative as they have found out
different information about exotic pets
that they didn’t know about. A lot of
people have said that the information
was mostly given on how to look after
pets. This could be due to the fact that
our documentary was the only first 5
minutes to a 30 minute full
documentary and people were unaware
of this, so later in the documentary
other information would have been
given.
8. Q7. WHAT WAS YOUR FAVOURITE
INTERVIEW?
The majority of people have
answered that their favourite
interview was the exotic pet shop
owner and the dog owner which
could be due to the fact that they
were very informative and had a
variety of different interviews which
have made it interesting. However
the least favourite interview was the
cat shelter worker and the pet shop
manager. This could be due to the
fact that the cat shelter worker just
gets cut of and the pet shop
manager just dragged out her
answers.
9. Q8. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL
AN 5 BEING VERY EYE CATCHING) HOW EYE
CATCHING DID YOU FIND THE DOCUMENTARY?
The answers to this question will allow me
to gain an understanding on how eye-
catching the audience thinks the
documentary is. The majority of people
have given us a score of 4 however quite a
lot of people have also given it a 5 and
there were no responses below 3 which
means that people generally thought that
the documentary was eye catching.
10. Q9. WHY?
The responses to this question
has allowed me to learn what was
eye catching about the
documentary and what wasn’t.
Most people said they the wide
range of cutaways have made the
documentary eye catching,
however some people have said
that the lighting in some of the
cutaways could have been a bit
better. Also a few people have
said that the graphics could have
been a bit more interesting which
could be an improvement.
11. Q10. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL AN 5 BEING
VERY TECHNICAL) HOW DID YOU FIND THE TECHNICAL
QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENTARY? (INCLUDING EDITING,
INTERVIEW SET UP, SOUND AND CONTINUITY)
This is probably due to the facts that
we have used industry standard
equipment and editing software
which have allowed us to construct
and produce a high quality product.
The responses to this question have allowed
me to find out how good or bad was the
quality of our documentary. The majority of
answers given for this question were 5 out of
5 which means that most people thought that
the documentary was of a high quality.
12. Q11. WHY?
The answers from this question
have allowed me to learn as to why
people thought the technical quality
of our documentary was good. A lot
of people have said that the
documentary looked professional
and that we have included a lot of
the codes and conventions which is
what we were aiming for when
producing the documentary. This
also tells me that we have
effectively used the different
technologies to construct our
product for it to be appealing for
our target audience.
13. Q12. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL AND 5 BEING
VERY OBEYING) TO WHAT STANDARD DO YOU FEEL THE
DOCUMENTARY OBEYED PROFESSIONAL CONVENTIONS OF A
DOCUMENTARY?
The answers to this question have allowed me
to gain knowledge on how professional
people thought our documentary was. The
majority of people have given the score of 5
and there were no scores below 3 which
means that generally people thought that our
documentary
obeyed the codes and
conventions of documentaries
and therefore resembled real
media products.
14. Q13. WHY?
The answers to this question has
allowed me to gain knowledge to
why people thought our
documentary obeyed the codes and
conventions of real documentaries.
A lot of people have said that our
documentary resembled real media
products which was what we were
aiming for. Some people have also
said that it was interesting and not
boring which made it like real
documentaries. This shows me that
we have successfully constructed a
product that is of a similar standard
to a real documentary.
15. Q14. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL AN 5
BEING COMPLETELY ENOUGH) DO YOU THINK THE
DOCUMENTARY SHOWED ENOUGH OF A RANGE OF
PETS?
The responses to this question have allowed
me to learn if we have included enough pets
in our documentary. The average score for
this question was 4.5 which means that the
majority of people have though that we have
included a wide range of
pets and we didn’t need anymore.
However some people thought we
could have included more pets in
the documentary. We could have
maybe included other pets in our
documentary such as horses or
birds.
16. Q15. ARE THERE ANY OTHER PETS
YOU CAN THINK OF THAT WE
COULD HAVE INCLUDED?
The responses to this question have
given us suggestions of what other
pets we could have included in our
documentary. A lot of people have
said that it would be a good idea to
include horses. I think that this is a
very good suggestion as it would
make the documentary not only
focus on pets that are kept at home
but also at pets that are kept outside
in places like the stables.
17. Q16. WHY?
This question has given us reasons
as to why we should have included
the pet that they have suggested in
our documentary. Some of the
responses have said that the pet that
they have suggested would make the
documentary more interesting. Also
people have said that it would have
allowed us to show people a
different perspective of keeping pets
which would have probably been
pets such as horses that are kept at
the stables and not in the house.
18. Q17. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL
AN 5 BEING ENOUGH) DO YOU THINK WE
INCLUDED ENOUGH INTERVIEWS?
The answers to this question have allowed me
to gain knowledge if people though we have
included enough interviews in our
documentary. The majority of people have
given us a 5 out of 5. Which means that we
have included enough of a range of interviews
in our documentary.
However there were some people
that have given us the score of 2 or 3
which means that they thought we
could have included more interviews.
19. Q18. HOW DO YOU THINK WE COULD HAVE
IMPROVED THE DOCUMENTARY?
The responses to this question have
allowed me to gain knowledge of what
we could improve in our documentary
to make it better. Some people have
said that the thing we could have
improved on is using more cutaways as
it would have made it more interesting.
Also people have said that we should
have ended it with an overview or a
conclusion, but again people didn’t
know that our production was only the
first five minutes to a 30 minute
documentary. Overall people have
given us a lot of suggestions on how
we could improve our documentary.
20. Q19. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL
AN 5 BEING PROFESSIONAL) DO YOU THINK THE
NEWSPAPER ADVERT INCLUDED HIGH QUALITY
PHOTOGRAPHS?
We also wanted to gain feedback about our two
ancillary texts, which one of them is the
newspaper advert. The answers to this question
have allowed me to find out if the audience
though the photographs were of high quality.
The average score for this question was 4.1
which means that a lot of people have
though that the photographs were of high
quality. However some people have given it
a score of 2 which means that the quality of
the photographs could have been improved.
21. Q20. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL
AN 5 BEING VERY PROFESSIONAL) HOW
PROFESSIONAL DO YOU THINK THE NEWSPAPER
ADVERT LOOKED?
The answers to this question have allowed me to
find out if people thought that our newspaper
advert looked professional. The average score for
this question was 4.03 which means that a lot of
people have thought that our newspaper advert
looked professional .
However some people have
given it a score of 2 which
means that they didn’t think
it looked professional, so
there are things that we
could improve on, to make it
look more professional.
22. Q21. HOW DO YOU THINK WE COULD HAVE
IMPROVED THE NEWSPAPER ADVERT?
The responses to this question
have given us suggestions of
what we could improve in our
newspaper advert to make it
better and more professional. A
lot of the responses have said
that the thing that we should
improve on is the background
and to add more animals as this
would make it more interesting
and eye catching. The responses
to thins question have taught me
of what can be improved in the
newspaper advert.
23. Q22. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL AN 5
BEING VERY GOOD QUALITY) DO YOU THINK THE
RADIO ADVERT WAS OF GOOD SOUND QUALITY?
We have also wanted to gain feedback about our
radio trailer . The answers to this question have
allowed me to gain knowledge if they thought
that the sound quality of the radio advert was
good. The average score for this question is 4.61
which means that the majority of people though
that the sound
quality of the radio trailer was
professional. No one gave a
score below 3 to generally
everyone thought that the
sound quality of the radio
trailer was good.
24. Q23. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL AN 5
BEING VERY EASY) HOW EASY WAS THE RADIO
TRAILER TO UNDERSTAND?
From this question I have learned if
the radio trailer that we have
produced was easy to understand for
our audience. The average score for
this question was 4.7 which means
that the majority of people thought
that the radio trailer was very easy to
understand. This is probably due to
the fact that it has been constructed
with good quality software that
allowed us to construct the radio
trailer to sound professional and easy
to understand.
25. Q24. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 (0 BEING NOT AT ALL AN 5
BEING VERY INTRIGUING) HOW MUCH DID THE RADIO
ADVERT INTRIGUE YOU TO WATCH THE
DOCUMENTARY?
From the answers to this question I was
able to find out if our target audience
thought that the radio trailer made the
documentary intriguing. The majority of
people have given us a score of 4 so they
thought that the radio trailer made the
documentary intriguing. So generally our
target audience though that it was
intriguing. However there was one person
that have given it a score of 2 meaning
that they didn’t think it made the
documentary sound intriguing.
26. Q25. DO YOU THINK THE RADIO
TRAILER FIT WITH DOCUMENTARY
WELL?
From this question I have
learned that everyone within
our target audience thought
that the radio trailer fit with
the documentary well. This
means that we have
successfully constructed a
radio trailer that was relevant
to the documentary and fit
with the documentary well.
27. Q26. WHY?
From the responses to this
question I was able to gain
knowledge of why people
thought that the radio fir with
the documentary well. One of
the most common responses
was that they thought that
both products complement
each other well, and the use
of many similar features such
as the same narrator and
music made them associate
the radio trailer with the
documentary.
28. Q27. DO YOU THINK THE PRINT
ADVERT FIT WITH THE
DOCUMENTARY WELL?
From the answers to this
question I was able to learn if
people thought that the print
advert fir with the documentary
well. The big majority of people
thought that the print advert fits
with the documentary well,
however there were two people
that though that it didn’t which
means that they are some
improvements could have been
made to make it more relatable
to the documentary.
29. Q28. WHY?
The responses from this question
has allowed me to gain knowledge
of why people thought that the
print advert did or didn’t fit with
the documentary. Most of the
responses said that there was a
range of animals used that have
been featured in the documentary.
However some people have said
that not enough exotic pets have
been used which could have
improved the print advert. Also
someone said that none of the
pets have been used that were in
the documentary so it didn’t link
as well as it could have.
30. Q29. ON A SCALE OF 0 TO 5 ( 0 BEING NOT AT ALL AND
5 BEING VERY) DID THE RADIO TRAILER AND PRINT
ADVERT MAKE YOU WANT TO WATCH THE
DOCUMENTARY?
From the answers to this question I was able to
find out if the radio trailer and the newspaper
advert made people want to watch our
documentary. The average score for this
question was 4.12 which means that a lot of
people have thought that the two promotional
texts were effective and made them want to
watch the documentary.
However there were a few people that
didn’t really think that the
promotional texts would want to
make them watch the documentary
which means that the promotional
texts were not as effective as we have
hoped.
31. Q30. WHY?
The responses to this question have
allowed me to gain knowledge of why
people thought the promotional text
were effective or not. The majority of
the responses were very positive and
a lot of people have said that the
promotional texts were intriguing
and made the documentary seem
interesting. However some people
have said that they weren’t intrigued
to watch the documentary which
means that we could have made
some improvements especially to the
newspaper advert to make it more
persuasive.
32. SOCIAL MEDIA
I have posted our
questionnaire on Facebook
which has helped us to get a
wider age range for our
feedback so the results are
more diverse and the
conclusions that I will make
from these results were
representative of all of our
target audience.
33. CONCLUSION
Overall we have gained a lot of feedback from the different age ranges within our target
audience. The audience feedback have taught me what specific things the audience was
looking at when giving responses to the questions and what they have liked and what
could be improved. I have learned that generally our audience seem to have liked the
documentary and thought it was appealing to them which was what we were aiming for.
This was due to the good construction of the documentary and because we have
followed the codes and conventions it made the documentary look professional. Some of
the things that we could improve on is exploring more topics which would have made
the documentary more interesting.
As well as this I have also learned that our radio trailer was appealing to our audience
and persuaded them to watch the documentary which is what we were aiming for.
Lastly I have gained knowledge from the feedback that people have generally liked the
newspaper advert but there could have been some changes being made to improve it,
such as changing the background and including more animals.
Overall the audience feedback had helped me notice all the little mistakes that we made
during production that could be improved on that would make our final products better.
If I could produce the documentary, newspaper advert and radio trailer gain I would
consider the suggestions given by the audience which would make the final [products
